throbber
Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit A
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 2 of 9
`
`Constantinou, Louis
`From:
`Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent:
`Monday, May 6, 2024 3:52 PM
`To:
`Tipescu, Mircea
`Cc:
`Shekhar Vyas; Vince Coppola; Constantinou, Louis; Kent E. Baldauf Jr.
`Subject:
`RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Mircea:
`
`We do not believe a further meet and confer is needed and Ameranth’s position has not changed.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, May 06, 2024 3:32 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>; Constantinou, Louis
`<LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Kent E. Baldauf Jr. <KBaldaufJr@webblaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Rich,
`
`Thank you for your response. In view of Ameranth’s refusal to agree to the requested extension, Defendants intend
`to file an opposed motion to extend the deadline to respond by 60 days, or alternatively until 21 days from the date
`the Court rules on the pending motion to dismiss in the earlier filed case.
`
`Please let me know if you believe a further meet and confer is needed or if Ameranth maintains its position
`below. We are available at your convenience today and tomorrow to meet and confer. Otherwise, Defendants will
`proceed with the opposed motion.
`
`Regards,
`Mircea
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mircea A. Tipescu
` Partner | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4976 |
`m: 312.342.0446
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 3 of 9
`
`MTipescu@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
`
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 2:45 PM
`To: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>; Constantinou, Louis
`<LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Kent E. Baldauf Jr. <KBaldaufJr@webblaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Mircea:
`
`Ameranth does not agree to a second extension to the defendants’ deadline to respond to the complaint (Case No. 2:23-
`cv-02165), after Ameranth not only agreed to extend the first deadline, but also agreed to a longer extension than was
`specified in LCvR 7. The parties are different in this case compared to the earlier case, there are new and different
`venue factors, and the patents and patent claims are different as well, along with there being new DoorDash patents
`that copied Ameranth's earlier innovations too. Further, the two new patents have very limited patent life remaining,
`and Ameranth is entitled to timely enforce them during their validity period. Consequently, Ameranth seeks to promptly
`move forward with this litigation.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2024 2:24 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>; Constantinou, Louis
`<LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Kent E. Baldauf Jr. <KBaldaufJr@webblaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Rich,
`
` I
`
` wanted to reach out in advance of the upcoming May 17 deadline for defendants to respond to the complaint in this
`case. As discussed previously, we believe that a ruling from the court on the motion to dismiss in the original action (2-
`22-cv-01776) will streamline the issues in this case. Accordingly, DoorDash intends to seek another extension of time to
`respond to the complaint.
`
`Please let us know if Ameranth is willing to agree to extend the deadline by an additional 60 days if the court does not
`rule this week on DoorDash’s motion to dismiss in the original action. We would like to file the motion for an extension
`of time next week.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`Thank you,
`Mircea
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mircea A. Tipescu
` Partner | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4976 |
`m: 312.342.0446
`
` MTipescu@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 1:02 PM
`To: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Louie:
`
`Vince and I spoke this afternoon. You are authorized to e-sign his name and file.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2024 2:00 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Vince,
`
`Just checking in again. Do we have your approval to file?
`
`Thanks,
`Louie
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 5 of 9
`
`Louis Constantinou
` Associate | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`m: 563.320.6117
`t: 312.212.4963 |
` LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
`
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vCard Bio
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 4:13 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Vince,
`
`Just following up. Can you please let us know if we have your approval?
`
`Thanks,
`Louie
`
`
`Louis Constantinou
` Associate | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4963 |
`m: 563.320.6117
` LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
`
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vCard Bio
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 11:32 AM
`To: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Louie:
`
`The revisions are acceptable, and yes, Ameranth agrees about the 45-day extension per LCvR7(E) should the Court deny
`the motion.
`
`Vince – please confirm your name can be signed.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 6 of 9
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 04, 2024 11:54 AM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Richard,
`
`Thank you for getting back to us. If we are removing any mention of Ameranth’s original action against DoorDash,
`we believe the attached revisions appropriately streamline the request. Please let us know if the attached is
`acceptable to Ameranth.
`
`Also. based on our conversation, we understand that Ameranth agrees to stipulate to at least a 45 day extension
`under LCvR 7(E) should the Court deny the attached motion or not rule by the current deadline to answer.
`
`Thanks,
`Louie
`
`
`Louis Constantinou
` Associate | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4963 |
`m: 563.320.6117
` LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
`
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vCard Bio
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 3:41 PM
`To: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>; Vince Coppola <vcoppola@pribanic.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Louie:
`
`Ameranth’s revisions to the proposed joint motion are attached. Vince is cc’d on this message and can provide
`authorization to e-sign after the parties confirm agreement on the document.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Friday, March 01, 2024 1:25 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>; Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Richard,
`
`Please see the attached joint motion. Let us know if you have any edits or if we have your approval to file.
`
`Thanks,
`Louie
`
`
`Louis Constantinou
` Associate | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4963 |
`m: 563.320.6117
` LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
`
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vCard Bio
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 12:51 PM
`To: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>; Shekhar Vyas <vyas@swdelaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Mircea:
`
`As a follow-up to our call, Ameranth agrees to a 60-day extension of time for the defendants to respond to the
`complaint and then will consider additional extensions thereafter. Please send us a proposed stipulation.
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 8 of 9
`
`From: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 4:59 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Cc: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Thanks Rich. Tomorrow at 1pm ET works for me. I’ll circulate an invite shortly.
`
`
`Mircea A. Tipescu
` Partner | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`m: 312.342.0446
`t: 312.212.4976 |
`
` MTipescu@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 3:01 PM
`To: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Cc: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Mircea:
`
`Tomorrow between 1 and 2 pm and between 4 and 5 pm ET currently are open. When is good for you?
`
`Thanks.
`
`Regards,
`
`Rich
`
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`www.swdelaw.com
`
`From: Tipescu, Mircea <MTipescu@beneschlaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 3:26 PM
`To: Richard C. Weinblatt <weinblatt@swdelaw.com>
`Cc: Constantinou, Louis <LConstantinou@beneschlaw.com>
`Subject: Ameranth v. DoorDash et al. (2:23-cv-02165)
`
`Dear Rich,
`
`We would like to discuss the timing of the above referenced case in view of the earlier action file by Ameranth against
`DoorDash. Are you available sometime this afternoon or tomorrow for a call?
`
`Thank you,
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-02165-WSH Document 18-1 Filed 05/08/24 Page 9 of 9
`
`Mircea
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mircea A. Tipescu
` Partner | Intellectual Property Litigation
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`t: 312.212.4976 |
`m: 312.342.0446
`
` MTipescu@beneschlaw.com | www.beneschlaw.com
` 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600, Chicago , IL 60606-4637
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Notice to Incorrect Addressee: www.beneschlaw.com/confidentialitynotice
`
`
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket