`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`
`AMERANTH, INC.,
`
`
` v.
`
`DOORDASH, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`C.A. No.: 2:22-cv-1776-WSH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`The above-entitled matter came before the undersigned United States District Court Judge
`
`on the Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or Alternatively, to Transfer, and Failure to State a
`
`Claim, filed by Defendant DoorDash, Inc. (“Defendant”).
`
`Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s
`
`Motion and ORDERS the following:
`
`1) venue against Defendant is improper in this District;
`
`2) Plaintiff’s claim for patent infringement fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
`
`granted because all claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,276,130 are patent ineligible and,
`
`therefore, invalid under 35 U.S.C. §101; and
`
`3) Plaintiff’s claim for willful infringement fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
`
`granted because Defendant lacks the requisite knowledge of U.S. Patent No.
`
`11,276,130 and the alleged infringement.
`
`Accordingly, all claims in the instant suit are hereby dismissed with prejudice in their
`
`entirety.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-01776-WSH Document 21-1 Filed 06/29/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: _______________, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`W. Scott Hardy
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`