throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
` CRUSOE ENERGY SYSTEMS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UPSTREAM DATA INC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`Case PGR2023-00039
`Patent 11,574,372
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Proceeding No. PGR2023-00039
`Attorney Docket No: 54598-0001PS1 
`Pursuant 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b), Petitioner objects to evidence submitted by
`
`Patent Owner in their Patent Owner’s Response filed April 16, 2023. Specifically,
`
`Petitioner objects to the following exhibits submitted by Patent Owner for the bases
`
`noted below:
`
`Exhibit
`EX2014
`
`EX2016
`
`Objections
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (July 13, 2022) is after the earliest possible priority
`date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative of the
`obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: To the extent statements are relied on for the truth
`of the matter asserted, they should be excluded as hearsay
`without any exception.
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (February 12, 2022) is after the earliest possible
`priority date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative
`of the obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: This reference was cited for the quote “I got
`laughed out of the room.” To the extent statements are
`relied on for the truth of the matter asserted, they should be
`excluded as hearsay without any exception.
`
`1
`
`

`

`EX2017
`
`EX2018
`
`Proceeding No. PGR2023-00039
`Attorney Docket No: 54598-0001PS1 
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (March 29, 2019) is after the earliest possible priority
`date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative of the
`obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: This reference was cited for the quote “But he has
`struggled to get oil-industry veterans interested in mining
`cryptocurrencies.” To the extent statements are relied on
`for the truth of the matter asserted, they should be excluded
`as hearsay without any exception.
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (March 4, 2021) is after the earliest possible priority
`date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative of the
`obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: This reference was cited for the quote “unique
`idea.” To the extent statements are relied on for the truth of
`the matter asserted, they should be excluded as hearsay
`without any exception.
`
`2
`
`

`

`EX2019
`
`EX2020
`
`Proceeding No. PGR2023-00039
`Attorney Docket No: 54598-0001PS1 
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (January 30, 2023) is after the earliest possible priority
`date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative of the
`obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: To the extent statements are relied on for the truth
`of the matter asserted, they should be excluded as hearsay
`without any exception.
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`401-402: This exhibit is not relevant because its purported
`date (September 5, 2022) is after the earliest possible
`priority date (February 8, 2017), and thus is not probative
`of the obviousness of the ’372 patent.
`801-803: This reference was cited for the quote “Another
`leading company in this niche is Upstream Data, which
`pioneered the concept in 2017.” To the extent statements
`are relied on for the truth of the matter asserted, they
`should be excluded as hearsay without any exception.
`403: This exhibit should further be excluded because, in
`view of its post-priority date status, any purported
`
`3
`
`

`

`Proceeding No. PGR2023-00039
`Attorney Docket No: 54598-0001PS1 
`relevance would be substantially outweighed by a danger
`of unfair prejudice and confusing the issues.
`
`
`
`These objections have been timely filed and are being concurrently served on
`
`the Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 23, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/John C. Phillips/
`John Phillips, Reg. No. 35,322
`Jia Zhu, Limited Rec. No. L1372
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 858-678-5070
`Fax: 877-769-7945
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Proceeding No. PGR2023-00039
`Attorney Docket No: 54598-0001PS1 
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned
`
`certifies that on April 23, 2024, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s
`
`Objections to Evidence was provided by email to the Patent Owner by serving the
`
`email correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`James M. Heintz
`Clayton Thompson
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`11911 Freedom Drive, Suite 300
`Reston, VA 20190
`
`Robert Anton Nissen
`Nissen Patent Law
`11044 82 Ave. N.W., Suite 401
`Edmonton, AB T6G 0T2
`CANADA
`
`Email: jim.heintz@us.dlapiper.com
`clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com
`robbie@nissenlaw.ca
`DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR@us.dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(858) 678-5667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket