throbber
Trials
`Thompson, Clayton; John Phillips; Trials
`PGR54598-0001PS1; Heintz, James M.; robbie@nissenlaw.ca; DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR
`RE: Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. UpStream Data Inc., No. PGR2023-00039
`Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:12:05 PM
`image002.png
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`Petitioner requests an extension to the deadline for serving portions of Petitioner’s supplemental
`evidence, which is needed to facilitate submission of multiple affidavits from the Internet Archive.
`According to Petitioner, “[a]ll supplemental evidence other than the Internet Archive’s affidavits will
`be served within the normal 10 business days.” Patent Owner responds stating that it “does not
`oppose Petitioner’s request for an extension of time for Petitioner to serve supplemental evidence
`from the Internet Archive.” Petitioner’s request is granted.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Thompson, Clayton <clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com>
`Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2024 3:21 PM
`To: John Phillips <phillips@fr.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: PGR54598-0001PS1 <PGR54598-0001PS1@fr.com>; Heintz, James M.
`<Jim.Heintz@us.dlapiper.com>; robbie@nissenlaw.ca; DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR <DLA-Crusoe-
`Upstream-PGR@us.dlapiper.com>
`Subject: RE: Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. UpStream Data Inc., No. PGR2023-00039
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Upstream does not oppose Petitioner’s request for an extension of time for Petitioner to serve
`supplemental evidence from the Internet Archive. Counsel for Petitioner first contacted Upstream
`regarding the extension request on Thursday afternoon before making Petitioner’s request to the
`Board the same day. We are responding now after having an opportunity to evaluate Petitioner’s
`request and consult with our client.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`Clayton Thompson
`
`Counsel for Upstream Data Inc.
`
` Clayton Thompson
`
`M +1 650 384 9826
`clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com
`
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`From: John Phillips <phillips@fr.com>
`Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 9:01 PM
`To: 'trials@uspto.gov' <trials@uspto.gov>
`Cc: PGR54598-0001PS1 <PGR54598-0001PS1@fr.com>; Heintz, James M.
`<Jim.Heintz@us.dlapiper.com>; Thompson, Clayton <clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com>;
`robbie@nissenlaw.ca; DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR <DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR@us.dlapiper.com>
`Subject: RE: Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. UpStream Data Inc., No. PGR2023-00039
`
`
`

`

`From: John Phillips
`Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 4:02 PM
`To: trials@uspto.gov
`Cc: PGR54598-0001PS1 <PGR54598-0001PS1@fr.com>; jim.heintz@us.dlapiper.com;
`clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com; robbie@nissenlaw.ca; DLA-Crusoe-Upstream-PGR <DLA-
`Crusoe-Upstream-PGR@us.dlapiper.com>
`Subject: Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. UpStream Data Inc., No. PGR2023-00039
`
`
`Your Honors –
`
`Petitioner seeks a conference to request an extension to the deadline for serving portions of
`Petitioner’s supplemental evidence, which is needed to facilitate submission of multiple affidavits
`from the Internet Archive. According to the Internet Archive’s policy, the turn-around time for
`obtaining such affidavits is at least 15 business days (although it may not take that long as we are
`requesting expedited treatment). All supplemental evidence other than the Internet Archive’s
`affidavits will be served within the normal 10 business days.
`
`Petitioner will coordinate with Patent Owner to find at least two mutually agreeable dates / times
`for a conference call, and Petitioner will report back to the Board with those details. In addition,
`Petitioner will arrange for a court reporter to participate in the conference.
`
`On information and belief, Patent Owner opposes this request.
`
`Respectfully,
`John Phillips
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`John Phillips | Fish & Richardson P.C. | 12860 El Camino Real | San Diego, CA 92130 | 619.549.3930
`
`
`
`
`************************************************************************************
`****************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
`reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`************************************************************************************
`****************************************
`
`The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use
`of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
`unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
`contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy
`all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster@dlapiper.com. Thank you.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket