Patent Application
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICEnee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICANTS:
`
`
`
`Park, Chanpyo etal.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ART UNIT:
`
`
`
`3695
`
`
`
`APPIN.NO.:
`
`
`
`
`15/056,827
`
`
`
`EXAMINER:TIBLJAS,Shacole C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FILING DATE:
`
`
`
`
`February 29, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED:
`
`
`
`March 4, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR:
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING ELECTRONIC PAYMENT
`
`
`
`
`SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHODTHEREOF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`
`
`Commissionerfor Patents
`
`
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDMENT,
`
`
`
`Sir:
`
`
`
`In responseto the Office Action ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office dated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December3, 2018, please consider the following amendments and remarks.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWAREV. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 1 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 1 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please amend the claimsas follows:
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) A method ofan electronic device, the method comprising:
`1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`displaying a plurality of images corresponding to a plurality of electronic cards.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respectively, on a display of the electronic device;
`displaying, in response to detecting a first user input for selecting an image among the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plurality of images, the selected{[an]] image, at_least_a portion of usage information_of_an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic card amongthe plurality of electronic cards correspondingto the selected image, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`graphical representation of a payment module ofthe electronic card on the display, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`usage information is associated with one or more payment that has been performed based on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic cardan-electrenie-card-on-a-sereen;
`detecting a second user input for selecting the graphical representationselection of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`payment module; and
`performing payment by using the electronic card_in_ response to the detection of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second user input,
`.
`wherein displaying the selected image, the at least a portion of the usage information and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the graphical representation comprises displaying the selected imagein a first area of the display,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`displayingthe at least a portion of the usage information in a second area of the display distinct
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from the first area and displaying the graphical representation in a third area of the display
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distinct from the first area and the second area.
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim 1, wherein thefirst area,
`the second area
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the third area are ime
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different layers on the displaysereen.
`
`
`
`3.
`(Currently Amended) The method of claim [[2]]1, wherein displaying the selected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`image, the at least a portion of the usage information, and the graphical representation payment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`module-ofthe-electronie-card-comprises controlling a size of the second area wherethe at least a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`portion of the usage information is displayed in response to detecting a third user input for
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 2 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`

` scrolling the second arealea
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`(Currently Amended)The method of claim 1, wherein SSDEEN the plurality of
`4,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ard-comprises:
`
`
`
`displaying one or moreelectroniccardsinalist;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`detecting a selection one of the one or more electronic cards in the list_as the first user
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`input-and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`(Original) The methodofclaim 4, whereindisplaying one or more electronic cards in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the list comprises displaying recommended electronic cards at an endofthelist.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6.
`(Original) The method of claim 5, wherein displaying the recommended cards
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprises displaying the recommended cards at the endofthelist in response to a scrolling on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the list.
`
`
`
`(Original) The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more electronic cards are
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`classified into a plurality of categories, and displaying ofthe list comprises:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`displaying the categories by tabs; and
`displaying the one or moreelectronic cards in the list to correspond to any one of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`categories,
`
`
`
`
`
`(Currently Amended) The methodof claim 1, wherein the electronic card is registered
`8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a first application to display the screen, and displaying the selected image, the at least a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`portion of the usage information, and thepayment-medule—ofthegraphicalrepresentation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electrenic-card-onthe-sereen-comprisesat least one of:
`
`registering the electronic card in a second application; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`removing the electronic card from the second application.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`(Original) The methodof claim 1, further comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`registering the electronic card in a first application to display the screen; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 3 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`registering the electronic card in the second application.
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`10. (Original) The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying recommended cards
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`based on input keywords.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11. (Currently Amended) Anelectronic device, comprising:
`
`
`
`
`a display unit; and
`a controller connected to the display unit and configured to:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`display a plurality of images correspondingto a plurality of electronic cards. respectively.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on a display of the electronic device;
`display, in response to detecting a first user input for selecting an image among the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plurality of images,
`the selected[[an]] image, at_least_a portion of usage information_of_an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic card among the plurality of electronic cards corresponding to the selected image, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`graphical representation of a payment moduleofthe electronic card on the display, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`usage information is associated with one or more payment that has been performed based on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic cardan-eleetronic-card-on-a-sereen,
`detect a second user input for selecting the graphical _representationseleetion of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`payment module, and
`perform a payment using the electronic card_in response to the detection of the second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`user input,
`wherein the image, the at least a portion of the usage information and the graphical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`representation are displayedin a first area, a second area and a third area, respectively, within the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`display unit different to each other.
`
`
`
`
`
`12. (Currently Amended) The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the first area, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second area andthe third area are cor
`cialnaceasiaiaeiiaaduiii layers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13, (Currently Amended) Theelectronic device of claim 11[[12]], wherein the controller
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is further configured to controla size of the second area where the at least a portion of the usage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information is displayed in response to detecting a third user input for scrolling the second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWAREV. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 4 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`14. (Currently Amended) The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the controller is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`further configured to display one or more electronic cardsin a list, detect a selection of the one
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or more electronic cards in the list as the first user input,and-display—the-sereen.
`
`15. (Original) The electronic device of claim 14, wherein the controller is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configured to display recommendedelectronic cards at an endofthelist.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16. (Original) The electronic device of claim 15, wherein the controller is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configured to display the recommended cardsat the end ofthe list in response to a scrolling on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thelist.
`.
`
`17. (Original) The electronic device of claim 14, wherein the controller is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configured to classify the one or more electronic cards into a plurality of categories, display the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`categories by tabs, and display thelist to correspondto any one of the categories.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18. (Original) The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the electronic card is registered
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the first application to display the screen, and wherein the controller is further configured to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`register the electronic card in the second application or remove the electronic card from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second application.
`
`
`
`19. (Original) The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the controller is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configuredto register the electronic card in the first application to display the screen, and register
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the electronic card in the second application.
`
`20. (Original) The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the controller is further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configured to display recommended cards based on input keywords.
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 5 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-20 are pendingin this application, with Claims 1 and 11 being recited in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`independent form. Claims 1-4, 8, and 11-14 are amended,as set forth above. No new matteris
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`presented.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Office Action:
`
`Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being directed to a judicial exception
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`without significantly more;
`Claims1, 4, 11, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S.Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0316992 to Obome; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 2, 3, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Obore in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0115125 to Chen;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims5, 6, 15, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Oborne in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0114777 to Guyot, and further
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in view ofU.S. Patent No. 8,126,782 to Zhu etal. (hereinafter Zhu);
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 7-9 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Obomein view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0279437 to Lee et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(hereinafter Lee); and
`Claims 10 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.§ 103 as being unpatentable over Oborne
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in view ofGuyot and Zhu, and further in view ofU.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2013/0006756 to Heo.
`
`
`
`Regarding the § 101 rejection of Claims 1-20, and with respect to independent Claim 1,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Examiner contendsthat:
`
`“Claim 1 recites a method for performing paymentwith an electric card,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which correspondsto the concepts identified as abstract ideas by the courts,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`such as a financial economic practice involving managing transactions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`between people in buySAFE Generating menus on a computer (Ameranth)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Classifying and storing digital images in an organized manner (TLI
`Comms.). The concept described in claim 1 is not meaningfully different than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page6 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`‘Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`the concept found by the courts to be an abstract idea. As such, the description
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in claim 1 ofregistering and performing payment with an electronic card is an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`abstract idea... Claims 11-20 are directed to an electronic device with similar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`steps and abstract idea described in claim 1, therefore they are rejected under
`
`
`
`the samerationale.”
`
`
`
`Claim 1, as amended, recites a methodof an electronic device, the method comprising:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`displaying a plurality of images corresponding to a plurality of electronic cards,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respectively, on a display of the electronic device;
`displaying, in response to detectinga first user input for selecting an image amongthe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plurality of images, the selected[{[an]] image,at least a portion ofusage informationofan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lectronic card amon lurality of electronic cards corresponding totheselected image, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`graphical representation of a payment moduleofthe electronic card on the display, wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`usage information is associated with one or more payment that has been performed based on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic cardan-electrenie-card-on-a-soreen;
`detecting a second user inputfor selecting the graphical representationseleetion of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`payment module; and
`performing paymentby using the electronic card_in response to the detection of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second user input,
`wherein displaying the selected image, the at least a portion ofthe usage information and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the graphical representation comprises displaying the selected imagein a first area of the display.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`displaying the at least a portion of the usage information in a second area of the display distinct
`
`
`
`
`
`from the first area and displaying the graphical representation in a third area of the display
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distinct from the first area and the secondarea.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Amended Claim 11 includes similar recitations as amended Claim 1, in device form, as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`set forth above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MPEP§ 2106.04(a)(I) entitled “CLAIMS THAT ARE DIRECTED TO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMPROVEMENTS IN COMPUTER FUNCTIONALITY OR OTHER TECHNOLOGY ARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOT ABSTRACT”states “[w]hen making the determination of whether a claim is directed to an
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page7 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 7 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`abstract idea, examiners should keep in mind that someinventions pertaining to improvements in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computer functionality or to improvements in other technologies are not abstract when
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`appropriately claimed, and thus maybeeligible at Step 2A.
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1 is amendedto recite “displaying a plurality of images corresponding to a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plurality of electronic cards, respectively, on a display ofthe electronic device,” “displaying, in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`response to detecting a first user input for selecting an image among the plurality of images, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`selected image, at least a portion of usage information of an electronic card amongtheplurality
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of electronic cards correspondingto the selected image, and a graphical representation of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`payment module ofthe electronic card on the display, wherein the usage informationis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`associated with one or more paymentthat has been performed based ontheelectronic card,”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“detecting a second user input for selecting the graphical representation of the payment module,”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“performing paymentby using the electronic card in response to the detection of the second user
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`input,” and “wherein displaying the selected image, the at least a portion of the usage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information and the graphical representation comprises displaying the selected imageinafirst
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`area ofthe display, displaying the at least a portion of the usage information in a second area of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the display distinct from thefirst area and displaying the graphical representation in a third area
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the display distinct from the first area and the second area” (emphasis added).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thepresent Specification, on page 215, line 29, to page 216,line 3, discloses:
`“la] keypad portion area, whichis used to receive the user’s input during PIN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`numberinput, is an area referred to as a SIP, which is a layer operating in a
`
`security mode. The area numbered (5)illustrated in FIG. P04-063
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`correspondsto the same, and (5) may bea structure existing in a layer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different from that of (1)-(4). The area no. (5) is in a different trust UI
`
`
`
`
`
`layer, thereby enhancing security.” (Emphasis added.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thus, Applicant respectfully submits that amended Claims 1 and 11 improve computer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`functionality by enhancing security and are, thus, patent eligible per MPEP § 2106.04(a)cI).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition, the Examiner contendsthat:
`
`
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page8 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 8 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`
`
`“Claims 2-10 are dependent on claim | and includeall of the limitations of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claim 1. Therefore, claims 2-10 recite the same abstract idea of “registering
`and performing payment with an electronic card.” The claims do not recite
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`any additional elements beyondthat of claim 1, therefore, claims 1-10 are not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drawn to eligible subject matter as they are directed to an abstract idea without
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`significantly more.”
`
`
`
`USPTO publication entitled “July 2015 Update On Subject Matter Eligibility”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(hereinafter Update), 80 Fed. Reg. 45429, dated July 30 2015, on pages | and2,states:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“[cJommentsalso stressed the importance of the 2014 IEG’s instruction that in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Step 2B, examiners are to considerall additional elements both individually
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and in combination to determine whetherthe claim as a whole amounts to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`significantly more than an exception.It is agreed that this instruction is vital to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ensuring the eligibility of many claims, because evenif an element does not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amountto significantly more on its own (e.g., because it is merely a generic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computer component performing generic computer functions), it can still
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amount to significantly more when considered in combination with the other
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`elements of the claim.”
`
`
`
`The Examinerdid not expressly address any recitation from the dependentclaims either
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`individually or in combination as required by Update, but merely made conclusory statements.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Furthermore, Claims 2-10 and 12-20 depend from amended Claims1 and 11, which,for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the reasons given above, Applicant respectfully submits recite patent eligible subject matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In view of the above, Applicant respectfully submits that Claims 1-20 concern patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`eligible subject matter and the § 101 rejection is overcome.
`
`
`
`Regarding the § 102(a)(1) rejection of independent Claims 1 and 11, and with respect to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1, the Examiner contends that Oborne disclosesall of the recitations of Claim 1. Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is amended as shown above.
`
`
`
`
`
`?
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 9 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 9 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`Amended Claim 11 includes similar recitations as amended Claim 1, in device form, as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`set forth above. Support for the amendmentis found in the Specification ofthe present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`application in at least FIGs. 60, 69A, and 69B, and on at least page 429, line 16, to page 430,line
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21, and page 436, line 14, to page 439,line 13.
`
`
`
`The Examiner admits that Oborne does not disclose or suggest displaying an image,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`usageinformation and a graphical representation of a payment modulebased ondistinct areas (or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layers), as recited in amended Claim 1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition, Applicant respectfully submits that Chen doesnot disclose or suggest a user
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`interface including an image, usage information anda graphical representation, as recited in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amended Claim 1.
`
`
`
`Chen, in paragraph [0047], merely discloses a switching operation configured to switch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`multiple applications between a foreground and a background according to a selection ofa user.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that neither Oborne nor Chen discloses “usage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information associated with one or more paymentthat has been performed based on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic card,” whichis selected by thefirst user input, as recited in amended Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(emphasis added).
`
`
`
`Applicant respectfully submits that Oborne merely discloses historical information that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`directs to a user’s prior purchases via an application but does not disclose “one or more payment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that has been performed based on the electronic card”selected by the user, as recited in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amended Claim 1 (emphasis added).
`
`
`
`
`
`Since amended Claim 11 includes similar recitations as amended Claim 1, the above
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`similarly applies to amended Claim 11.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 10 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 10 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Patent Application
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket: 1235-1005 (SP16027-US_DMC)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In viewof the above, Applicant respectfully submits that Oborne. in view of Chen does
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not anticipate or render obvious amended Claims | and 11, and the §§ 102(a){1} and 103
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rejections are overcome,
`
`
`
`
`
`Without conceding the patentability, per se, of dependent Claims 2-10, and 12-20, these
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims are believed to be patentably distinct over the cited references, based at least on their
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dependence [rom amended Claims | and 11, respectively, and the §§ 102(a)C1) and 103
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rejections are overcome,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Accordingly, all of the claims pendingin the application, namely, Claims 1-20, are
`believed to be in conditionfor allowance, which is respectfully requested. Should the Examiner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`believe thataeeconference or panneinterviewwould facilitate resolution ofany
`
`ARSE for Applicants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE FARRELL LAWFIRM, PoC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`290 Broadhollow Road, Suite 210 &
`
`Melville, New York 11747
`
`
`
`
`
`(516) 228-3565
`TEL:
`
`1]
`
`
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 11 of 11
`
`CARDWARE EXHIBIT 2010
`CARDWARE V. SAMSUNG
`PGR2023-00013
`Page 11 of 11
`
`