throbber
HHS Public Access
`Author manuscript
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Published in final edited form as:
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 August ; 94: 72–82. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.05.007.
`
`Sex differences in the ACTH and cortisol response to
`pharmacological probes are stressor-specific and occur
`regardless of alcohol dependence history
`
`Robert M. Anthenellia,*, Jaimee L. Heffnerb, Thomas J. Blomc, Belinda E. Daniela, Benjamin
`S. McKennaa, and Gary S. Wandd
`aDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, Health Sciences, La Jolla, CA,
`United States
`
`bFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
`
`cDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of
`Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
`
`dThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
`
`Abstract
`Women and men differ in their risk for developing stress-related conditions such as alcohol use
`and anxiety disorders and there are gender differences in the typical sequence in which these
`disorders co-occur. However, the neural systems underlying these gender-biased
`psychopathologies and clinical course modifiers in humans are poorly understood and may involve
`both central and peripheral mechanisms regulating the limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.
`In the present randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, triple-dummy crossover study, we
`juxtaposed a centrally-acting, citalopram (2 mg/unit BMI) neuroendocrine stimulation test with a
`peripherally-acting, dexamethasone (Dex) (1.5 mg)/corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) (1 μg/kg)
`test in euthymic women (N = 38) and men (N = 44) with (54%) and without histories of alcohol
`dependence to determine whether sex, alcohol dependence or both influenced the
`adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol responses to the pharmacological challenges
`and to identify the loci of these effects. We found that central serotonergic mechanisms, along with
`differences in pituitary and adrenal sensitivity, mediated sexually- diergic ACTH and cortisol
`responses in a stressor-specific manner regardless of a personal history of alcohol dependence.
`Specifically, women exhibited a greater response to the Dex/CRF test than they did the citalopram
`
`*Corresponding author at: Pacific Treatment and Research Center, Department of Psychiatry (0603), University of California, San
`Diego, Health Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0603 United States. ranthenelli@ucsd.edu (R.M. Anthenelli).
`Disclosures
`Dr. Anthenelli provides consulting and/or advisory services to Pfizer and US World Meds. The Pacific Treatment and Research Center
`has received grant support from Alkermes and Pfizer. Drs. Heffner, Daniel, McKenna, Wand and Mr. Blom have no competing
`interests to disclose.
`Declaration of interest
`Dr. Anthenelli provides consulting and/or advisory services to Pfizer and US World Meds. The Pacific Treatment and Research Center
`has received grant support from Alkermes and Pfizer. Drs. Heffner, Daniel, McKenna, Wand and Mr. Blom have no competing
`interests to disclose.
`Appendix A. Supplementary data
`Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.10167j.psyneuen.2018.05.007.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`SPRUCE - EXHIBIT 2001
`Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. v. Spruce Biosciences, Inc.
`PGR2022-00025
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 2
`
`test while men exhibited the opposite pattern of results. Women also had more robust ACTH,
`cortisol and body temperature responses to Dex/CRF than men, and exhibited a shift in their
`adrenal glands’ sensitivity to ACTH as measured by the cortisol/log (ACTH) ratio during that
`session in contrast to the other test days. Our findings indicate that central serotonergic and
`peripheral mechanisms both play roles in mediating sexually dimorphic, stressor-specific
`endocrine responses in humans regardless of alcohol dependence history.
`
`Keywords
`Dex/CRF test; Alcohol use disorder; Sex differences; Serotonin (5-HT); Citalopram stimulation
`test; Cortisol
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`
`Women and men differ in their risk for developing stress-related mental health conditions
`such as alcohol dependence (AD) (Keyes et al., 2008), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
`(Kessler et al., 1995) and major depression (Kessler et al., 1994). For example, men develop
`AD at roughly twice the rate of women; while for PTSD, the female to male prevalence rate
`is 2:1 in the opposite direction. The role of stress in the development and maintenance of
`AD also differs between the sexes. Thus, in contrast to AD men where alcohol problems
`usually antedate the onset of anxiety and depression, AD women typically suffer from
`stress-related anxiety or mood disorders prior to the onset of AD (Hesselbrock et al., 1985;
`Kessler et al., 1997), and experience increased post-abstinence depressive symptoms
`(Hatsukami and Pickens, 1982) or frank depressive episodes (Hasin and Grant, 2002) when
`they quit drinking. While the disparity between women and men is widely known, the neural
`mechanisms underlying these gender- biased psychopathologies and clinical course
`modifiers are poorly understood.
`
`Sexual diergisms in the limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (LHPA) axis that regulates
`the neuroendocrine limb of the stress response have been proposed as important mediators
`of sex-specific disease risk (Bangasser and Valentino, 2014). These dimorphisms are found
`at all levels of the axis - from the cortical and limbic structures (e.g., prefrontal cortex,
`hippocampus and amygdala) that send inputs to neurons in the paraventricular nucleus
`(PVN) of the hypothalamus which secrete corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and arginine
`vasopressin (AVP) - to the peripheral target of these secretagogues, the pituitary, which
`secretes adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and stimulates the adrenal gland to release
`cortisol (Goel et al., 2014; Solomon and Herman, 2009). The PVN also receives stimulatory
`and inhibitory signals from monoaminergic afferents originating in the midbrain which
`themselves are influenced by sex steroids (Barth et al.,2015).
`
`The serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT) system has been implicated as playing an
`important role in mediating sex-biased psychopathologies such as AD (Anthenelli et al.,
`2001; Marcinkiewcz et al.,2016) and PTSD (Ravindran and Stein, 2009). Studies in non-
`human primates and humans have found sex differences or gonadal steroid effects in 5-HT
`synthesis (Sakai et al., 2006; Sanchez et al., 2005), presynaptic autoreceptor (e.g., 5-HT1A
`receptor) activity (Pecins- Thompson and Bethea, 1999), postsynaptic receptor function
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 3
`
`(Centeno et al., 2007), reuptake (Pecins-Thompson et al., 1998), and degradation (Gundlah
`et al., 2002). 5-HTergic neurons originating in the brainstem raphe nuclei innervate the
`LHPA axis centrally at the levels of the prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus, and
`also send branches to the PVN of the hypothalamus to form bidirectional feedback loops
`between the CRF and 5-HT systems (Barth et al., 2015). Thus, the 5-HT- CRF system is
`uniquely poised to regulate ACTH and cortisol release in a sex-sensitive manner.
`
`Prior work from our group implicated the 5-HT-CRF system as a potential mediator of sex-
`specific ACTH and cortisol reactivity in longterm abstinent AD men and women and
`controls (Anthenelli and Maxwell, 2002; Anthenelli et al., 2001). We found that AD men
`and women had an exaggerated and prolonged endocrine response to the 5- HT-releaser,
`fenfluramine, compared with non-AD controls, and that the ACTH response to fenfluramine
`was increased to a larger extent in AD women compared with all other groups. However, our
`earlier experiments had too few women to confirm whether there was a reproducible
`disparity in 5-HT-induced ACTH and cortisol release, and were not designed to identify the
`locus of the disturbance at either a suprapituitary (i.e., 5-HT impacting the hypothalamus or
`limbic structures regulating the PVN) or peripheral (pituitary and/or adrenal) level. This
`latter distinction is important because sex differences have also been found at the levels of
`the pituitary corticotrophs (Gallucci et al., 1993), adrenal cortex (Figueiredo et al., 2007),
`and gonadal steroids influence the glucocorticoid-dependent negative feedback loop that
`terminates the stress response (Weiser and Handa, 2009).
`
`In order to begin disentangling the effects of sex and AD on stress circuit function we
`conducted the first double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study targeting different loci
`in the LHPA axis. Using a pharmacological stressor approach, we performed a citalopram
`stimulation test in women and men with and without histories of AD to examine whether
`sex, AD, or both affected the individual’s response to this selective 5-HTergic probe. We
`also examined glucocorticoid-dependent negative feedback, along with pituitary-adrenal
`sensitivity in these same women and men by administering the combined dex-
`amethasone/CRF stimulation test to determine sex and AD effects on those parameters.
`Based on our preliminary results, we hypothesized that: 1) women would have greater
`ACTH and cortisol responses than men to both the citalopram and dexamethasone/CRF
`stimulation tests; and 2) AD women would have substantially greater ACTH responses to
`both challenges than the other three groups.
`
`2. Material and methods
`
`2.1. Participants
`
`Adult premenopausal women and men with (n = 165) and without (n = 112) remitted AD
`(early or sustained) were recruited from treatment facilities or the general population,
`respectively. One aim of the study was to determine whether longer-term abstinent AD
`participants differed from non-AD controls in endocrine (ACTH and cortisol),
`cardiovascular (blood pressure and heart rate), and subjective responses to the citalopram
`stimulation test, thus, AD participants had been abstinent from alcohol and all other drugs
`(except nicotine) for a minimum of 60 days prior to neuroendocrine testing. The study was
`approved by the University of Cincinnati Institutional Review Board and Cincinnati VA
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 4
`
`Research and Development Committee, and all participants provided written informed
`consent and were compensated for their time and effort.
`
`Participants were excluded if they were ≥ 56 years of age, or evidenced an independent (i.e.,
`non-substance-induced) mood, anxiety, psychotic or eating disorder within the past 12
`months. Psychotropic and other systemic medications that could influence the stress
`response were not allowed, and all participants were in generally good health as evidenced
`by normal physical examinations, laboratory testing and electrocardiogram. Female
`participants were excluded if they were pregnant, lactating, or using any form of hormonal
`contraception that could alter corticosteroid-binding globulin levels and, thus, affect
`measurement of plasma cortisol concentrations (Kirschbaum et al., 1999).
`
`2.2. Rationale for the double-blind, crossover study and targets of the pharmacological
`probes
`
`The study was designed to assess the central effects of the citalopram stimulation test (CST)
`in juxtaposition to the peripheral effects of the combined dexamethasone/CRF test (Dex/
`CRF) while controlling for any potential placebo effects as determined by a third test
`administering triple-dummy placebos. Acute increases in brain 5-HT levels reliably
`produced by a single dose of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), citalopram
`(Nadeem et al., 2004), stimulate neurons in the PVN of the hypothalamus via 5-HT1A and/or
`5-HT2A/2C receptors (Hanley and Van de Kar, 2003; Heisler et al., 2007) to secrete CRF and/
`or AVP (Jørgensen et al., 2003) to initiate a stress response. Whereas our prior work in AD
`men and women demonstrated sex-specific, exaggerated ACTH/cortisol responses to
`serotonergic stimulation compared with non-AD controls (Anthenelli and Maxwell, 2002;
`Anthenelli et al., 2001), and since these increased hormonal responses might have been of
`either central or peripheral origin, in the present experiment we also administered the
`combined Dex/CRF test. In that paradigm, administration of the synthetic glucocorticoid
`inhibits the pituitary release of ACTH which, in turn, suppresses cortisol secretion. The dex-
`amethasone suppression portion of the challenge allows one to assess differences in the
`glucocorticoid-dependent negative feedback loop. The CRF portion of the test is believed to
`measure pituitary-adrenal sensitivity as well as CRF/AVP feed forward drive of the axis in
`the setting of low endogenous cortisol (Heuser et al., 1994a). Thus, differential patterns of
`activation across the CST and Dex/CRF test days has the potential to distinguish a
`suprapituitary versus pituitary-adrenal locus of response.
`
`2.3. Procedures
`
`This was a randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy crossover study wherein participants
`received each of 3 separate challenge tests (i.e., placebo, CST, Dex/CRF) in counterbalanced
`order. Effort was made to conduct neuroendocrine tests in female participants at roughly
`once- monthly intervals (mean = 44.2 ± 32.3 days between sessions) and timed to
`correspond with the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle as determined by a calendar
`method (Mortola et al., 1990) and by measurements of plasma estradiol and progesterone
`concentrations. Testing in men occurred at shorter between-session intervals (mean = 26.0
`± 43.0 days; p < 0.01; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The neuroendocrine stimulation tests
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 5
`
`comprised visits 3–5 of an overall 6-session paradigm as illustrated in Fig. 1 and as
`described below.
`
`Details of Visits 1, 2 and 6 have been described previously (Heffneret al., 2011). Briefly,
`after a telephone screening procedure (n = 1199), 277 eligible participants were interviewed
`by a trained research assistant with the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of
`Alcoholism - Version II (SSAGA-II) (Bucholz et al., 1994) to determine in- clusionary and
`exclusionary diagnoses using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders,
`4th Edition, Text-Revised (DSM-IV-TR) criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
`Recency, frequencies and quantities of alcohol, nicotine and other drug use were codified in
`the relevant sections of the SSAGA-II and monitored throughout the protocol using the
`calendar-based TimeLine Follow-Back (TLFB) technique (Sobell and Sobell, 1992). Self-
`reported abstinence from drinking and drug use was verified by repeated alcohol
`breathalyzer testing; urine drug dipstick and confirmatory urine toxicology screening; and
`evaluations of state markers of heavy drinking including liver function tests (LFTs) (e.g.,
`gamma glutamyltransferase [GGT]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and %
`carbohydrate-deficient transferrin. Most AD participants were residing in a controlled sober
`living environment during their participation in the protocol. This also served as another
`safeguard of AD participants’ abstinence during testing.
`
`The triple-dummy design consisted of participants ingesting a capsule at 2100 h the night
`prior to each day of neuroendocrine testing. On two of the three nights, this capsule
`contained placebo, except for the one evening that preceded the CRF stimulation test when
`participants ingested 1.5 mg of dexamethasone as part of the combined Dex/CRF test. All
`capsules contained riboflavin as a tracer which was used along with ultraviolet detection,
`reminder notices, and phone calls as a means of monitoring adherence with taking the
`capsules. After reporting to the laboratory the next morning at 0715 h and following an
`overnight fast, a heparicath attached to a 3-way stopcock was placed in the antecubital
`region of the non-dominant arm. On two of the testing days, 3cc of saline was injected
`intravenously at approximately 0830 hrs (i.e., on the placebo and CST days), except for the
`Dex/CRF day, when ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone (Ferring Laboratories) (1 μg/kg)
`diluted in saline was injected intravenously by slow push (over 10 min). Also at 0830 hrs,
`participants ingested a second capsule containing either placebo (i.e., on the placebo and
`Dex/CRF days) or citalopram (2 mg/ unit BMI: 37 mg minimum to 60 mg maximum
`dosage) with 8 ounces of water.
`
`During each laboratory session, participants reclined in a chair and were asked to stay calm
`throughout the session. Venous blood samples for baseline measures of cortisol, ACTH,
`electrolytes, LFTs and sex steroid concentrations (women only) were obtained at −45 and
`− 5 min pre-ingestion/-infusion of the capsule/IV solution. A Dinamap Pro 100 V2 (GE
`Medical Systems, Tampa, FL) and digital thermometer (Welch Allyn Sure Temp,
`Skaneateles Falls, NY) were used to measure blood pressure, heart rate and body
`temperature, respectively, at these baseline timepoints. Following administration of the study
`drugs, blood samples and vital sign measurements were obtained every 15 min for the first
`hour, and then every 30 min for the next 4 h, to monitor the endocrine and cardiovascular
`effects of the various challenge agents.
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 6
`
`Subjective measures of drug and mood effects were also obtained at these same timepoints.
`These included the Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS) (Schuckit, 1984) which
`measures an individual’s subjective experience of a drug across 13 domains (e.g., feeling
`high, sleepy, etc.) using visual analog scales; and the Profile of Mood States (POMS),
`another self-report assessment of an individual’s emotional state that uses a Likert rating
`scale (McNair et al., 1971).
`
`2.4. Stress hormone assays
`
`Venous blood samples were collected in ice-chilled vacutainer tubes containing 0.1 ml of
`15% EDTA. Plasma ACTH concentrations were measured using an immunoradiometric
`assay (DiaSorin; Stillwater, MN) with an assay sensitivity of ~ 1.0 pg/ml and intra- and
`interassay coefficients of variance < 10%. Plasma cortisol levels were measured by
`radioimmunoassay (Siemens Health Care Diagnostics; Los Angeles, CA). The assay has a
`sensitivity of ~0.3 μg/dl across a standard range from 0.5 to 50 μg/dl. The intra-and
`interassay coefficients of variance were < 10%
`
`2.5. Data analyses
`
`Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed using analysis of variance
`(ANOVA) with Tukey-adjusted post hoc tests, chi- square tests or non-parametric median
`tests. ANOVA models were used to analyze baseline measures, peak changes from baseline
`measures, and hormone area-under-the-curve (AUC) values. Mixed linear models were used
`to analyze the repeated measures hormonal ratio data across the 13 time points on each of
`the test days. Log- or square root-transformations were used on the AUC and peak change
`from baseline hormonal data to correct for non-normality. For clearer interpretation of the
`results, however, all data presented are raw data. Significance levels for all hypothesis testing
`were 0.05 and test were two-sided. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2
`(Cary, N.C.).
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Demographics and clinical characteristics
`
`Table 1 presents the demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample demonstrating
`the expected main effects of a diagnosis of AD on marital status, household income,
`educational attainment level, alcoholism severity score, drinking parameters and lifetime use
`of other drugs. AD men were significantly older than men and women in the other three
`groups, and AD women had significantly higher BMIs than participants in the other groups.
`AD women had been abstinent longer than AD men, and reported the highest rates of
`lifetime cocaine/stimulant abuse or dependence compared with the other three groups.
`
`In order to examine which of the demographic and clinical variables should be considered
`for inclusion as covariates in our subsequent models of stress responsivity, Spearman
`correlations were examined among all variables found to significantly differ across the four
`groups (e.g., age, BMI, days abstinent) with the baseline and area under the curve (AUC)
`hormonal measures on each test day. If any demographic or clinical variable was
`significantly correlated with the hormonal measures, then it was included in data analyses as
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 7
`
`a covariate. Based on this analysis, three variables - age, family history of alcoholism, and
`any history of illicit drug abuse or dependence - were included as covariates in subsequent
`analyses. We also included order in the models to control for the effects that receiving the
`various stimulation agents in different sequences may have had on the study results.
`
`3.2. Baseline resting AM hormonal concentrations
`
`Fig. 2 illustrates the baseline ACTH and cortisol concentrations across the three test days.
`As depicted in the upper panel (Fig. 2A), women had lower resting AM ACTH levels than
`men on the placebo test day (main sex effect: F = 7.69; df = 1; p < 0. 007), but there were no
`significant sex or alcohol group effects for ACTH on either the Dex/CRF or citalopram test
`days. Baseline cortisol concentrations, however, did not significantly differ across the four
`groups on any of the test days (Fig. 2B).
`
`3.3. Placebo day differences in hormonal concentrations
`
`Serum ACTH and cortisol levels on the placebo day are depicted in Fig. 3. After controlling
`for significant baseline ACTH differences (F = 520.0; df = 75; p < 0.001), results of a
`repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant time effect (F = 3.4; df = 11; p < 0.001)
`and a sex x time interaction for ACTH (F = 2.7; df = 11; p < 0.006) indicating that women’s
`ACTH levels increased over time while men’s did not (see upper panel, Fig. 3A). There
`were no significant main effects of alcohol group (p = .11), sex (p = .25), or their interaction
`(p = .67).
`
`After adjusting for baseline cortisol concentrations (F = 419.4; df = 75; p < 0.0001), an
`identical analysis for the cortisol levels on the placebo day revealed a main effect for sex (F
`= 4.6; df = 1; p < 0.04), time (F = 3.2; df = 11; p < 0.002), and a significant sex x time
`interaction (F = 2.2; df = 11; p < 0.03; see Fig. 3B). Women had lower cortisol levels than
`men throughout most of the morning test hours. There was no alcohol group effect (p = .64)
`or group x sex interaction (p = .81), but there was a significant effect of a family history of
`alcoholism (F = 7.0; df = 1; p < 0.01) with family history positive (FHP) individuals having
`lower cortisol concentrations over time compared with family history negative (FHN)
`participants.
`
`Given these findings of sex differences at rest and in response to a placebo challenge, the
`placebo day AUC response was used as a covariate in all subsequent analyses.
`
`3.4. Sex- and stressor-specific hormonal responses
`
`The upper panel of Fig. 4 portrays the net integrated serum ACTH (left, Fig. 4A) and
`cortisol (right, Fig. 4B) responses to the three neuroendocrine stimulation tests using AUC
`values as the dependent variable. Regarding the ACTH response, after controlling for
`significant baseline ACTH (F = 102.5; df = 1,68; p < 0.001), family history of alcoholism
`(FHP > FHN: F = 4.1; df = 1,68; p < 0.05), and order (F = 2.5; df = 5,68; p < 0.05) effects,
`ANCOVA results revealed a significant sex x treatment (test day) interaction effect (F = 6.2;
`df = 1,68; p < 0.02) without any main sex (p = .78), AD group (p = .92) or treatment (p = .
`85) effects. Post hoc analyses demonstrated a trend (p < 0.1) for women to have greater
`ACTH release in response to the Dex/CRF test than with the citalopram test.
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 8
`
`Evidence for pharmacological stressor-specificity was even more apparent upon examination
`of the cortisol AUC measures (upper right panel, 4.B). Women had significantly greater
`cortisol responses to the Dex/CRF test as compared to the citalopram test (treatment x sex
`interaction): t = −5.09; df = 68; p < 0.0001) even after controlling for significant placebo (F
`= 9.0); df = 1,68; p < 0.004) and order (F = 4.20; df = 5,68; p < 0.003) effects. There was
`also evidence of a sexually-dimorphic response to the combined Dex/CRF test: following
`dexamethasone suppression, women had significantly greater cortisol responses to
`exogenous CRF than men (treatment x sex interaction: t = 2.49; df = 68; p < 0.02).
`
`A similar pattern of findings emerged when the peak change from baseline hormonal
`measures served as the dependent variables in the ANCOVA models (lower panels, Fig. 4C
`and D). However, when this metric of HPA axis stimulation was used, the corollary of our
`previous finding was revealed with men demonstrating stressor-specific response patterns
`across the testing days. Regarding the ACTH response (lower left panel, Fig. 4C), after
`controlling for significant baseline ACTH (F = 43.1; df = 1,68; p < 0.0001), placebo day (F
`= 21.9; df = 1,68; p < 0.0001), and order (F = 3.1; df = 5,68; p < 0.02) effects, ANCOVA
`results revealed significant treatment (test day) (F = 7.3; df = 1,68; p < 0.009) and sex x
`treatment interaction effects (F = 6.9; df = 1,68; p < 0.015) without any AD group (p = .97)
`or AD group interaction effects (e.g., group x sex: p = .84). Thus, men had significantly
`greater ACTH responses on the citalopram test day than they did on the Dex/CRF day
`(treatment x sex: t = 3.8; df = 68; p = .0003). Moreover, men had significantly lower ACTH
`responses than women in response to the Dex/CRF test (treatment x sex: t = 2.7; df = 68; p <
`0.008) after controlling for the aforementioned variables.
`
`A nearly identical pattern of responses was observed for the peak change in cortisol
`responses (lower right panel, Fig. 4D), where again, after controlling for significant baseline
`cortisol (F = 19.2; df = 1,68; p < 0.0001), placebo day (F = 37.8; df = 1,68; p < 0.0001), age
`(F = 4.4; df = 1,68; p < 0.04) and order effects (F = 4.1; df = 5,68; p < 0.003), a treatment x
`sex interaction emerged (F = 8.9; df = 1,68; p < 0.004). Consistent with the ACTH results,
`men had significantly greater peak cortisol responses to citalopram than Dex/CRF (treatment
`x sex: t = 3.0; df = 68; p < 0.003). The sexual diergism in the response to the Dex/CRF test
`was again apparent with women having significantly greater peak change in cortisol
`responses compared with men (treatment x sex effect: t = 3.09; df = 68; p < 0.003).
`
`3.5. Sex- and pharmacological stressor-specific differences in adrenal sensitivity
`
`To determine whether there were sex or alcohol group effects on adrenal sensitivity, we
`calculated the cortisol to log (ACTH) ratios for each of the three neuroendocrine stimulation
`tests. This ratio has been used by others (Ulrich-Lai and Engeland, 2002) as an indirect
`measure of the adrenal’s response to pituitary ACTH. In the resting non-stimu- lated
`baseline state, cortisol to log (ACTH) ratios were similar across all four groups on each test
`day, albeit markedly smaller in magnitude on the Dex/CRF day when cortisol and ACTH
`concentrations were suppressed by the presence of the synthetic glucocorticoid (data not
`shown).
`
`However, examination of these ratios over time across each of the three test sessions
`revealed further evidence that this indirect marker of adrenal sensitivity appears to vary by
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 9
`
`sex and fluctuate in response to different pharmacological stressors. Fig. 5 portrays the plots
`of the cortisol to log (ACTH) ratios on the citalopram (upper panel, Fig. 5A), Dex/CRF
`(middle panel, Fig. 5B), and placebo (lower panel, Fig.5C) test days, respectively. After
`controlling for significant baseline differences and accounting for the effects of age, illicit
`drug use, and family history of alcoholism, men exhibited greater degrees of adrenal
`sensitivity (i.e., greater cortisol to log (ACTH) ratios) than women on both the citalopram
`and placebo test days. That is, results of separate repeated measures ANCOVAs revealed
`significant main effects for sex (citalopram: F = 4.3; df = 72, p < 0.05; placebo: F = 7.2, df =
`72, p < 0.01) as well as significant sex x time interactions (citalopram: F = 2.0, df = 72, p <
`0.04; placebo: F = 1.9, df = 72, p = .05) on each of these test days.
`
`A different pattern of results emerged, however, when we examined these ratios on the
`Dex/CRF day (see Fig. 5B). After controlling for significant baseline (F = 203.3; df = 1,72;
`p < 0.0001) and illicit drug abuse effects (i.e., participants who had abused drugs in the past
`had higher ratios; p < 0.03), there was a main sex effect (F = 4.7; df = 72; p < 0.04) without
`any significant sex x time interaction (p = .2). Thus, under the conditions of the Dex/CRF
`test day, women had greater cortisol to log (ACTH) ratios than men and this sex difference
`did not fluctuate as a function of time.
`
`3.6. Cardiovascular and body temperature response
`
`Men had higher baseline systolic (p-values < 0.003) and diastolic (p-values < 0.02) blood
`pressure levels, respectively, compared with women on all three test days (see Supplemental
`Table 1). Peak changes in diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different across the
`four groups on any of the test days; however, the elevated systolic and diastolic blood
`pressures observed in men at baseline remained higher than women’s throughout each of the
`test sessions (data not shown). There were no significant differences in either baseline or
`peak change in heart rates across the groups on any of the test days.
`
`Regarding the temperature responses, there were no significant sex or alcohol group effects
`on any of the test days (data not shown). However, there was a pharmacological stressor-
`specific elevation in peak change in body temperature: women exhibited significantly
`increased body temperatures compared with men on the Dex/CRF day (main sex effect: F =
`11.8; df = 1; p < 0 .001) without any alcohol group (p = .9) or sex x group (p = .9)
`interaction effects. Body temperature changes were similar across the four groups on the
`citalopram and placebo test days.
`
`3.7. Subjective drug and mood responses
`
`Baseline total SHAS scores and peak Δ from baseline SHAS scores were examined on each
`test day. Since SHAS results were not normally distributed, this variable was dichotomized
`(i.e., no SHAS response vs. any response) and logistic regression analysis was used. There
`were no significant sex effects across the three test days, nor were there any significant
`alcohol group or group x sex interaction effects on the Dex/ CRF and placebo days (data
`now shown). On the citalopram day at baseline, a significant group effect (p < 0.04) was
`observed, and there was a trend for a group x sex interaction (p < 0.07). Peak change in
`
`Psychoneuroendocrinology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 March 11.
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`Author Manuscript
`
`

`

`Anthenelli et al.
`
`Page 10
`
`SHAS scores did not significantly differ as a function of sex or alcohol group status on any
`of the test days (data not shown).
`
`Supplemental Fig. 1 depicts the POMS total score at baseline across the four groups on each
`of the neuroendocrine challenge test days. Separate ANCOVAs controlling for age, family
`history of alcoholism and history of illicit drug ab

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket