`Monika Semmrich [1], Jean-Baptiste Marchand [2], Matilda Rehn [1], Laetitia Fend [2],Christelle Remy [2], Petra Holmkvist [1], Nathalie Silvestre [2], Carolin Svensson [1], Patricia Kleinpeter [2], Jules Deforges [2],
` Fred Junghus [1], Linda Mårtensson [1], Johann Foloppe [2], Ingrid Teige [1], Eric Quéméneur [2], Björn Frendéus [1]
`[1] BioInvent International AB, Lund, Sweden, [2] Transgene S.A., Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
`Abstract #746
`
`Non Injected
`VVGMαCTLA4
`VVGMαCTLA4 + αCD4
`VVGMαCTLA4 + αCD8
`
`100
`
`0 20
`
`20 25 30
`35
`40
`45 50
`Days post cell injection
`
`55
`
`60
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Percent survival
`
`3. Anti-tumor activity in vivo
`Figure 6. Vectorization in oVV allows intratumoral accumulation of transgenes with low systemic exposure
`Amount of transgenes in tumor vs blood was measured for both anti-CTLA-4 mAb and GM-CSF (not shown) in syngeneic
`CT26 model.
`a)
`Tumor
`
`100
`
`systemic
`
`b)
`
`40
`
`Tumor
`
`systemic
`
`25
`
`10
`
`1
`
`0.1
`
`0.01
`
`EC90
`EC10
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`αCTLA4 μg/mL serum
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`0.1
`
`0.01
`
`αCTLA4 μg/g tumor
`
`4. Mode-of-action characterization
`Figure 10. Anti-tumor response is CD8 T cell-dependent
`a)
`b)
`
`****
`****
`
`injected
`Tumor
`
`Spleen
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`15
`
`% IFNγ+ TNFα+ (of CD8+ cells)
`
`c)
`
`10
`
`*
`
`02468
`
`0.6
`
`% AH-1+ CD8+ (of live cells)
`
`b, c) i.t. VVGM-αCTLA4
`induced tumor-specific
`CD8+ T cells both in in-
`jected tumors and in
`peripheral
`compart-
`ments as assessed by
`c) ex vivo restimulation
`of splenocytes with
`CT26
`(AH-1)-specific
`peptide
`and
`the
`percentage of IFN-γ+
`and TNFα+ CD8+ T
`cells or b) dextramer
`staining of AH1- speci-
`fic CD8+ T cells.
`
`***
`
`*
`
`*
`
`**
`
`contralateral
`Tumor
`
`0123455
`
`30
`10
`
`% IFNγ+ TNFα+ (of CD8+ cells)
`
`**
`
`****
`
`VVGM
`αCTLA4
`
`VVGM
`
`αCTLA4
`
`PBS
`
`% AH-1+ CD8+ (of live cells)
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`Depletion of CD8+
`and CD4+ T cells
`prior to treament of
`CT26-bearing mice with VVGM-αCTLA4 demons-
`trated a crucial role for CD8+ T cells in the anti-
`tumor response.
`d)
`
`adaptive immune responses
`cytolysis
`granzyme-mediated apoptotic signaling pathways
`neutrophil chemotaxis
`neutrophil migration
`
`size
`
`0.001
`
`0
`
`VVGM αCTLA4
`αCTLA4 i.p.
`8
`4
`1
`Days post treatment start
`
`10
`
`0.001
`
`0
`
`1
`
`8
`4
`Days post treatment start
`
`10
`
`1. Background
`Treatment with checkpoint inhibitor antibodies results in long-lasting antitumor responses in a variety of cancers [1].
`However, only a small fraction of patients responds to the treatment, probably due to inadequate tumor infiltration with
`immune cells. While combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies significantly improves efficacy, con-
`cerns with tolerability has limited wide-spread clinical use [2].
`Here we present a potentially safe and more efficacious strategy to combine anti-CTLA-4 and anti- PD-1/PDL1 checkpoint
`inhibition in the context of oncolytic virotherapy. A Treg-depleting anti-CTLA-4 antibody has been vectorized alongside
`GM-CSF into the Invir.IO™ oncolytic Vaccinia virus (oVV) based platform. This product named BT-001 (VVGM-αhCTLA4)
`consists of the Copenhagen oVV strain - deleted in J2R and I4L viral genes allowing restricted replication in proliferating
`cells - and the human CTLA-4-specific antibody 4-E03 IgG1, which shows improved Treg-depletion compared with ipilimu-
`mab.
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`MFI
`
`200
`
`100
`
`CD8 T cell
`
`3.
`
`
`
`CTLA-4αCTLA-4
`
`GM-CSF
`
`2.
`
`1.
`
`Figure 7. Improved survival after treatment with VVGM-αCTLA4 in several syngeneic tumor models
`CT26
`A20
`EMT6
`MC38
`B16
`
`a) Concentration of anti-mouse CTLA-4
`mAb 5-B07 was monitored in syngeneic
`CT26 tumor model. CT26 colorectal tumor
`cells were implanted subcutaneously to
`Balb/c mice and virus was injected 3 times
`i.t. One injection intraperitoneally of 5-B07
`at 3 mg/kg was used as benchmark.
`b) Intratumoral administration of VVGM-αCTLA4 was associated with sustained intratumoral antibody exposure and intratu-
`moral Treg depletion, systemic exposure was orders of magnitude lower and not associated with peripheral Treg depletion.
`
`VVGM
`αCTLA4
`
`PBS
`
`05
`
`% FoxP3+ cells (of CD4+)
`
`0
`
`VVGM
`αCTLA4
`
`PBS
`
`% FoxP3+ cells (of CD4+)
`
`VVGM
`αCTLA4
`
`VVGM
`
`αCTLA4
`
`PBS
`
`01234
`
`% IFNγ+ TNFα+ (of CD8+ cells)
`
`7 1
`
`4
`23
`
`29
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`0
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`8/10
`
`60
`
`0
`
`0
`
`8/10
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`0
`
`3/10
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`VVGM αCTLA4
`control VV
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`10/10
`
`10/10
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`Figure 2. In primary patient
`material, CTLA-4 is highest
`expressed on
`intratumoral
`Treg cells which makes them
`a good target for Treg deple-
`ting antibodies.
`
`Treg
`CD8+
`CD4+ non-Treg
`
`CD8+ tumor
`CD8+ ascites
`tumor
`ascites
`Patient blood
`healthy PBMC
`tumor
`ascites
`Patient blood
`healthy PBMC
`
`0
`
`fold change
`3.0
`2.5
`2.0
`1.5
`
`d) Gene expression analyses of
`tumors from VVGM-αCTLA4-injected
`compared to VV-injected CT26 tu-
`mor-bearing mice supported the
`CD8+ T cell-dependent (and potenti-
`ally NK cell-mediated granzyme-de-
`pendent) anti-tumor immunity.
`
`*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005, ****p < 0.001
`by one-way ANOVA
`
`Figure 11. Intratumorally induced CD8+ T cell anti-tumor immunity is cDC1-dependent
`
`WT/ PBS
`Batf3 -/-/ PBS
`WT/ VVGM αCTLA4
`Batf3 -/-/ VVGM αCTLA4
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Percent survival
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`100
`80
`
`60
`40
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`60
`Days post tumor cell injection
`
`100
`80
`
`60
`40
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`Days post tumor cell injection
`
`60
`
`100
`80
`
`60
`40
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`60
`Days post tumor cell injection
`
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`Days post tumor cell injection
`
`0
`
`60
`40
`20
`Days post tumor cell injection
`
`80
`
`100
`80
`60
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Percent survival
`
`Figure 1. Local administration of BT-001 combines on-
`colytic activities with high intratumoral concentrations of
`anti-CTLA-4 antibody and GM-CSF eliciting a stronger
`antitumor response with improved safety profile.
`
`CD4+ non-Treg
`
`Treg
`
`NOG mice
`
`a)
`
`8.0
`
`hCD80
`
`hCD86
`
`2.0
`
`1.5
`
`Naive CD8+ T cells
`Foxp3+ CD8+ T cells
`Intermediate CD8+ T cells
`CD8+ effector T cells (Klrg1+, T3)
`Activated CD8+ T cells
`Act./Exhausted CD8+ T cells (PD1+ TIM3+, T2)
`Exhausted CD8+ T cells (PD1+ TIM3+, T2)
`Resting CD4+ T cells
`Intermediate CD4+ T cells
`Activated CD4+ T cells
`Treg cells (FoxP3+ Klrg1-)
`Activated Treg cells (FoxP3+ Klrg1+, T1)
`
`Control VVGMαCTLA4
` treated
`Spleen
`
`VVGMαCTLA4
` contralateral
`
`Naive CD8+ T cells
`Intermediate CD8+ T cells
`Activated CD8+ T cells I
`Activated CD8+ T cells II (GzmBhi, Klrg+, S1)
`Naive CD4+ T cells
`Intermediate CD4+ T cells
`Activated CD4+ T cells
`Resting Treg cells
`Treg cells
`Activated Treg cells
`
`20
`
`0
`
`S1
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`CD4+
`
`CD8+
`
`Treg
`
`CD8+
`
`UMAP2
`
`500
`
`0
`
`60
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`0
`
`4-E03
`ipilimumab
`
`2-C06
`
`2-F09
`
`Control
`
`CD8+ T cells (% of control)
`
`0
`
`4-E03
`ipilimumab
`
`2-C06
`
`2-F09
`
`Control
`
`Treg cells (% of control)
`
`2. Generation of BT-001 and mouse surrogate VVGM-αCTLA4
`Figure 3. Treg depleting and blocking anti-CTLA-4 mAb 4-E03
`BioInvent‘s F.I.R.S.T. discovery platform [3] was used to isolate
`scFv antibody fragments recognizing human or mouse CTLA-4.
`Target-specific antibody clones were classified as actives, transfer-
`red to full-length IgG format, and further characterized biochemi-
`cally and functionally. The antibody clone 4-E03 was chosen as
`candidate for vectorization in Copenhagen oVV. It blocks CD80/
`CTLA-4 and CD86/CTLA-4 interactions with the same potency as
`ipilimumab (a) but the Treg depleting activity is improved compared
`to ipilimumab as demonstrated in a PBMC-NOG/SCID transfer
`model in vivo (b). An anti-mouse CTLA-4 antibody (clone 5-B07,
`mouse IgG2a) with similar functional effects in ligand blocking and
`Treg depletion (data not shown) was selected for the generation of
`the murine surrogate virus VVGM-αCTLA4 .
`
`Local, intratumoral admi-
`nistration of VVGM-αCTLA4
`induced complete tumor
`regression in contralateral
`uninjected CT26 tumors
`in 7/9 mice demonstrating the induction of systemic antitumor responses, or the abscopal effect. There was no evidence
`of viral particle dissemination to uninjected tumors as assessed by plaque assay (data not shown).
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`05
`
`00
`
`60
`
`7/9
`
`40
`20
`Days post treatment
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`Days post treatment
`
`500
`
`0
`
`60
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`05
`
`60
`
`00
`
`1/10
`
`40
`20
`Days post treatment
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`Days post treatment
`
`MC38 tumor-bearing WT and Batf3-/- C57BL/6
`mice received i.t. injections of VVGM-αCTLA4 or
`PBS. Graphs show tumor volume (left and
`center panels) and mouse survival (right panel).
`Vertical lines indicate end of the treatment.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`40
`30
`20
`10
`Days post treatment start
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`40
`20
`Days post treatment start
`
`60
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`4-E03
`2-C06
`ipilimumab
`
`Antitumoral activity of Copenhagen oVV encoding an anti-mouse CTLA-4 and murine GM-CSF (VVGM-αCTLA4) was
`assessed in different syngeneic tumor models after 3 i.t. administrations of 107 PFU. Results demonstrate broad and
`potent antitumor activity of VVGM-αCTLA4 in immune inflamed and immune excluded models.
`
`0.01 0.1
`1
`mAb conc. (nM)
`
`10 100
`
`CD8+ T cells
`
`1500
`
`Figure 8. Intratumoral injection of VVGM-αCTLA4 induces systemic antitumor immunity (abscopal effect)
`PBS
`PBS
`VVGM αCTLA4
`VVGM αCTLA4
`i.t. treated tumor
`contralateral tumor
`i.t. treated tumor
`contralateral tumor
`
`1500
`
`1500
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`1000
`
`1000
`
`1000
`
`Figure 12. I.t. VVGM-αCTLA4 expands effector CD8+ T cells and reduces Treg and exhausted CD8+ T cells
`Control
`Tumor
`VVGMαCTLA4
`T2
`
`Treg
`
`T1
`
`treated
`
`100
`
`T3
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`untreated
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`0.0001
`
`RLU (luminescence; x105)
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`1
`0.01 0.1
`mAb conc. (nM)
`
`10
`
`100
`
`Treg cells
`
`*
`
`6.0
`
`4.0
`
`2.0
`
`0.0
`0.0001
`
`RLU (luminescence; x106)
`
`b)
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`CD4+
`UMAP1
`
`0
`
`Control VVGMαCTLA4
`
`Spleens (lower panels), injected
`and contralateral tumors (upper
`panels) were collected on day 10
`post treatment and stained with a
`high-dimensional panel designed
`to identify T cell populations.
`
`Vehicle
`αPD-1
`VVGM αCTLA4
`VVGM αCTLA4 + αPD-1
`
`*
`
`*
`
`80
`60
`40
`20
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`100
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Probability of Survival
`
`0
`
`0
`
`treated
`
`0/10
`
`60
`40
`20
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`80
`
`1500
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Figure 4. Oncolytic Vaccinia virus Copenhagen strain
`Copenhagen oVV strain (Invir.IOTM platform, Transgene)
`- is deleted in J2R (TK locus) and I4L (RR locus) viral genes involved
`in nucleotide synthesis to restrict replication in proliferating cells
`- allows large DNA insertions with successful vectorization of various
`expression cassettes
`- has the best oncolytic activity among VACV strains
`- induces Immune Cell Death
`
`Vaccinia virus (VV)
`Copenhagen strain →
`Oncolytic virotherapy
`
`VV / TK -RR - / TG
`
`(1)
`
`TRANSGENES: Enzyme,
`TRANSGENES:
`cytokines, mAb,
`enzymes, cytokines, mAb
`ligands….
`
`Double deletion of genes to
`enhance tumor-selectivity
`
`Figure 5. oVV expressing 4-E03 and GM-CSF (VVGM-αhCTLA4, BT-001) or 5-B07 and mGM-CSF (VVGM-αCTLA4)
`a)
`b)
`Hepatocytes
`HepG2
`
`Figure 9. Combination of VVGM-αCTLA4 with anti-PD-1 is benificial
`a)
`b)
`αPD-1
`VVGM αCTLA4
`VVGM αCTLA4 + αPD-1
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1500
`
`10/10
`
`60
`40
`20
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`80
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`1500
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`0
`
`6/10
`
`60
`40
`20
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`80
`
`1500
`
`5. Conclusions
`• BT-001 is a multifunctional oVV co-developed by Transgene and BioInvent that encodes a Treg-depleting αCTLA-4
`antibody as well as the cytokine GM-CSF.
`Intratumoral delivery of a Vaccinia-Virus encoded anti-CTLA4 antibody achieved tumor-restricted exposure and
`•
`Treg depletion.
`• The murine surrogate VVGM-αCTLA4 has demonstrated a robust antitumoral activity in several syngeneic tumor
`models. This antitumoral activity is CD8+ T cell-dependent and synergized with αPD-1 treatment to reject cold tumors.
`• A clinical study investigating i.t. VVGM-αhCTLA4 (BT-001) alone and in combination with αPD-1 in metastatic or ad-
`vanced solid tumors has been commenced (NCT04725331).
`
`6. References
`1. Sharma, P. and J.P. Allison, Science, 2015. 348(6230): p. 56-61.
`2. Postow, M.A., et al., N Engl J Med, 2015. 372(21): p. 2006-17.
`3. Soderlind, E., et al., Nat Biotechnol, 2000. 18(8): p. 852-6.
`
`4. Arce Vargas, F., et al., Cancer Cell, 2018.
`5. Kleinpeter, P., et al., Oncoimmunology, 2016. 5(10): p. e1220467.
`6. Fend, L., et al., Cancer Res, 2017. 77(15): p. 4146-4157.
`7. www.transgene.fr, www.bioinvent.se
`
`c) The synergizing effects of VVGM-αCTLA4 and
`αPD-1 were confirmed in the A20 model where a
`sub-optimal dose of VVGM-αCTLA4 (105 PFU)
`cured the majority of animals in combination with
`αPD-1.
`c)
`
`100
`
`VVGM αCTLA4 + αPD-1
`VVGM αCTLA4 + isotype
`control VV + αPD-1
`αPD-1
`Vehicle
`control VV
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`60
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Probability of Survival
`
`2/10
`
`20
`40
`60
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`80
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`Tumor volume (mm3)
`
`contralateral
`
`105
`
`104
`
`103
`
`102
`
`101
`
`105
`
`104
`
`103
`
`102
`
`101
`
`Replication rate
`
`100
`
`100
`
`p7.5
`
`Light chain
`
`pSE/L
`
`GM-CSF
`
`p7.5
`
`Heavy chain
`
`4-E03 produced by BT-001-
`infected tumor cells compa-
`red to recombinant 4-E03
`
`TG6002
`BT-001
`VV W T
`VV W T
`BT-001
`TG6002
`a) Anti-CTLA-4 mAb and GM-CSF were vectorized in Copenhagen oVV. Thereby deleted J2R and I4L genes were replaced
`by heavy and light chain of anti-CTLA-4, respectively. The expression cassette encoding GM-CSF was also placed at the
`I4L locus. b) BT-001 selectively replicated in tumor cells and not in normal cells, similar to the clinically validated oVV
`TG6002 (Transgene).
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0/10
`
`20
`40
`60
`Days post cell inoculation
`
`80
`
`a, b) In the ICB re-
`sistant B16 model,
`treatment with
`VVGM-αCTLA4
`significantly
`reduced tumor growth of the primary injected tumor. However, i.t.
`VVGM-αCTLA4 only induced a slight delay of uninjected tumor’s
`growth, which did not translate into animal survival. Combined
`treatment with i.t. VVGM-αCTLA4 and systemic αPD-1 significant-
`ly inhibited injected and uninjected tumor growth (b), resulting in
`~20 % of animals being cured in this “cold” cancer model.
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2010 - Page 1
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site