throbber
Downloaded by guest on May 20, 2021
`
`Human Power of N Company
`EX1052
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 86, pp. 3375-3378, May 1989
`Medical Sciences
`
`Role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of
`blood pressure
`(L-arginine/hypertension/vascular endothelium/endothelium-derived relaxing factor)
`
`D. D. REES, R. M. J. PALMER, AND S. MONCADA
`Wellcome Research Laboratories, Langley Court, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BS, United Kingdom
`
`Communicated by George H. Hitchings, January 27, 1989
`
`The role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide
`ABSTRACT
`in the regulation of blood pressure in the anesthetized rabbit
`was studied with Na-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a
`specific inhibitor of its formation from L-arginine. L-NMMA
`(3-100 mg-kg-'), but not its D-enantiomer, induced a dose-
`dependent long-lasting (15-90 min) increase in mean systemic
`arterial blood pressure. L-NMMA (100 mg kg-') also inhibited
`significantly the hypotensive action of acetylcholine, without
`affecting that of glyceryl trinitrate. Both these actions of
`L-NMMA were reversed by L-arginine (300 mg-kg-'), but not
`by D-arginine (300 mg-kg-'), indomethacin (1 mg-kg-'), pra-
`zosin (0.3 mg-kg-'), or by vagotomy. The effects of L-NMMA
`in vivo were associated with a significant inhibition of the
`release of nitric oxide from perfused aortic segments ex vivo.
`This inhibition was reversed by infusing L-arginine through the
`aortic segments. These results indicate that nitric oxide for-
`mation from L-arginine by the vascular endothelium plays a
`role in the regulation of blood pressure and in the hypotensive
`actions of acetylcholine.
`
`Although endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation and the
`release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in vitro has
`been clearly established (1-4), there is only circumstantial
`evidence to indicate their occurrence in vivo. Alterations in
`vessel diameter that follow changes in blood flow are endo-
`thelium dependent (5). Furthermore, damage to the endothe-
`lium (6, 7) or treatment with methylene blue (8) or gossypol
`(9), two nonspecific inhibitors of endothelium-dependent
`relaxation, all abolish the response to endothelium-depend-
`ent vasodilators in vivo without affecting the response to the
`endothelium-independent vasodilators, sodium nitroprusside
`or glyceryl trinitrate (n3Gro).
`Nitric oxide (NO) accounts for the biological actions of
`endothelium-derived relaxing factor (10-15) and is formed by
`vascular endothelial cells from the terminal guanido nitrogen
`atom(s) of the amino acid L-arginine (16, 17). This biosyn-
`thetic process, the endothelium-dependent relaxation of
`vascular rings, and the vasodilatation induced by acetylcho-
`line (ACh) in the coronary circulation of the rabbit heart are
`inhibited by the L-arginine analogue, Na-monomethyl-
`L-arginine (L-NMMA; refs. 4 and 18-20). These results
`indicate that L-arginine is the physiological precursor for NO
`synthesis by the vascular endothelium.
`We have now used L-NMMA to investigate the role of NO
`in the regulation of blood pressure in the anesthetized rabbit.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Methods. Male New Zealand White rabbits (2.0-2.2 kg)
`were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone (40-50
`mg-kg-1). Anesthesia was then maintained by a continuous
`
`infusion of sodium pentobarbitone (15 mg kg-' hr-1) via the
`left marginal ear vein and the rabbits were ventilated with
`room air via a tracheotomy tube.
`Mean arterial blood pressure was monitored with a pres-
`sure transducer (Bell & Howell, Ashford, U.K.) connected,
`via a cannula containing heparinized (10 units-ml-1) saline, to
`the right carotid artery. Phenylephrine was administered as a
`continuous infusion into the right marginal ear vein. All other
`drugs were administered as 15-sec infusions via a cannula in
`the right femoral vein. Blood pressure and heart rate were
`monitored continuously on a four-channel polygraph (Grass).
`For ex vivo experiments, L-NMMA (100 mg kg-1; i.v.) was
`administered and the animals were sacrificed 10 min later.
`The thoracic aorta was rapidly removed and perfused intralu-
`minally with Krebs' buffer within 30 min of treatment. The
`release of NO induced by ACh was determined by cascade
`bioassay and chemiluminescence (4).
`Materials. NO (>99.98% pure, British Oxygen, Guildford,
`U.K.) solutions were prepared as described (11).
`n3Gro (Wellcome), phenylephrine, ACh, atropine sulfate,
`indomethacin, L- and D-arginine (Sigma), U46619 (9,11-
`dideoxy-9a,lla-methanoepoxy prostaglandin F2,) (Cayman
`Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI), sodium pentobarbitone (May &
`Baker, Dagenham, U.K.), and prazosin (Pfizer Diagnostics)
`were obtained as indicated. L-NMMA and Nw-monomethyl-
`D-arginine (D-NMMA) were synthesized as described (21).
`All drugs used were administered in saline.
`Statistical Evaluation. Results, expressed as means ± SEM
`of n experiments, were analyzed statistically by Student's t
`test for paired data. A value of P < 0.05 was considered
`statistically significant.
`
`RESULTS
`L-NMMA (3-100 mg-kg-'), but not D-NMMA (100 mg-kg-'),
`caused a dose-dependent increase in mean arterial blood
`pressure (Fig. 1). The hypertension induced by L-NMMA
`was rapid in onset, reaching a plateau within 5 min (Fig. 2A).
`Its duration was also dose dependent, so that the hyperten-
`sion induced by 3 mg-kg-' and 100 mg-kg-' of L-NMMA
`lasted 10-15 and 60-90 min, respectively (n = 5). The
`increase in blood pressure induced by L-NMMA (100
`mg-kg-1) was always accompanied by a slight bradycardia
`(Fig. 2; n = 5). Administration of L-arginine (300 mg-kg-'),
`which had no direct effect on either mean arterial blood
`pressure or on heart rate, reversed the hypertension and the
`decrease in heart rate induced by L-NMMA within 10 min
`(Fig. 2B).
`ACh (0.1-3.0 ,g-kg-1) and n3Gro (1-30 ,uggkg-') caused a
`dose-dependent fall in mean arterial blood pressure (ED50
`0.20 ± 0.04 and 2.4 ± 0.3 ,ugkg-', respectively; n = 3)
`without affecting the heart rate significantly. Phenylephrine
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: L-NMMA, N'-monomethyl-L-arginine; D-NMMA,
`N'O-monomethyl-D-arginine; n3Gro, glyceryl trinitrate; ACh, acetyl-
`choline.
`
`3375
`
`Downloaded by guest on May 20, 2021
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`3376
`
`Medical Sciences: Rees et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`Effect of L-NMMA on the hypotensive responses
`Table 1.
`induced by ACh and n3Gro
`
`Fall in blood pressure, mmHg
`(mean ± SEM)
`Phenylephrine
`L-NMMA
`
`13.3 ± 2.8
`23.3 ± 2.7
`33.1 ± 2.6
`37.4 ± 3.0
`
`2.6 ± 1.7*
`10.1 ± 2.0*
`22.6 ± 1.9*
`28.5 ± 1.1*
`
`Vasodilator
`ACh, &gkg-1
`0.1
`0.3
`1
`3
`n3Gro, .ggkg-'
`6.8 ± 1.9
`6.1 ± 1.5
`1
`16.4 ± 3.1
`16.7 ± 4.7
`3
`30.8 ± 3.0
`30.0 ± 3.9
`10
`37.3 ± 5.0
`37.0 ± 5.2
`30
`The vasodilator effects of ACh and n3Gro were compared in
`animals treated with L-NMMA and in animals whose blood pressure
`had been elevated to a comparable level with phenylephrine. The
`blood pressure in the L-NMMA (100 mg kg-')- and phenylephrine
`(300 ig-kg4-hr-1)-treated animals was 84.6 ± 3.2 and 88.6 ± 7
`mmHg, respectively. L-NMMA inhibited the vasodilator effects of
`ACh but not those of n3Gro.
`*P < 0.05.
`
`abolished within 15 min this inhibition by L-NMMA (100
`mgkg-; n = 3).
`When the blood pressure was raised by phenylephrine, the
`hypotensive actions of similarly effective doses of ACh (0.3
`,ugkg-1) and n3Gro (3 zg-kg-') were accompanied by an
`increase in the heart rate of 11 ± 2 and 10 + 2 beats per min,
`respectively (n = 3). These doses of ACh and n3Gro caused
`a similar increase in heart rate when the blood pressure was
`raised by L-NMMA (9 ± 1 and 12 ± 2 beats per min,
`respectively; n = 3).
`The blood pressure was not affected by indomethacin (1
`mg-kg-') but was slightly reduced by prazosin (0.3 mg-kg-').
`Bilateral vagotomy caused a small increase in mean arterial
`blood pressure. None of these interventions affected the
`actions of L-NMMA (n = 3 for each).
`Infusion ofACh (0.1-3.0 ,uM) for 1 min through the excised
`aortae from untreated animals induced a concentration-
`dependent release of NO detected by bioassay (Fig. 3A) or by
`chemiluminescence (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the release of NO
`induced by ACh (0.1-3.0 ,uM) from aortae obtained from
`animals treated with L-NMMA (100 mg-kg-') was inhibited
`significantly when measured by bioassay (Fig. 3B) or
`chemiluminescence (Fig. 4B). Infusion of L-arginine (100
`,uM) through the aortae from control animals did not affect
`significantly the release of NO induced by ACh but restored
`fully the release observed in aortae from L-NMMA-treated
`animals (n = 3).
`
`DISCUSSION
`A physiological role for endothelium-derived NO in the
`control of vascular tone in vivo has not been clearly demon-
`strated. This has mainly been due to the difficulties associ-
`ated with removal of the endothelium in vivo, the extremely
`labile nature of NO, and the absence of a specific inhibitor of
`its synthesis. There is, however, some evidence to support
`the proposal that the endothelium-dependent vasodilator
`responses observed in conduit arteries in vitro also occur in
`vivo (5-9).
`The formation of NO in the coronary circulation in vitro
`accounts for the vasodilatation induced by ACh in the rabbit
`heart (22) and by bradykinin in the guinea pig heart (23),
`indicating that NO also plays a role in regulating the tone of
`resistance arteries. The demonstration that L-arginine is the
`physiological precursor for NO synthesis by the vascular
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0o
`
`O
`0
`
`0 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 0 .
`
`o
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 0. 0
`
`30 r
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`cm
`
`IEE
`
`a-
`
`z w c
`
`o
`
`lU
`
`cr0
`
`z
`
`30
`10
`3
`L-NMMA mg kg-1
`
`100
`
`Effect of L-NMMA (3-100 mg-kg-; i.v.) on the mean
`FIG. 1.
`arterial blood pressure (B.P.) of the rabbit. o, Increase in blood
`pressure in each animal; *, mean. Measurements were made 5 min
`after administration of L-NMMA. Resting jlood pressure was 68 +
`3 mmHg (n = 5).
`(300 ,ug kg-1 hr-') raised the blood pressure to a level similar
`to that induced by L-NMMA (100 mg-kg-') and significantly
`enhanced the hypotensive actions of ACh and n3Gro. When
`the enhanced responses to ACh and n3Gro in phenylephrine-
`treated animals were taken as controls, then L-NMMA (100
`mg-kg-'), but not D-NMMA (100 mg-kg-'), caused a signif-
`icant inhibition of the ACh-induced hypotension, without
`affecting that induced by n3Gro (Table 1). Administration of
`L-arginine (300 mg-kg-'), but not D-arginine (300 mg-kg-'),
`
`A
`
`30 min.
`30 min.
`120_///
`
`B.P.
`(mm Hg) 60
`
`90
`
`30-
`28Q
`
`;
`
`200
`
`H .R
`(bpm)
`
`B
`
`120
`
`B.P.
`90
`(mm Hg) 60
`
`30_
`
`280r
`
`24
`
`200L
`
`H.R.
`
`(bpm)
`
`L-NMMA
`100mg kg1
`
`1min
`
`__
`
`1min
`
`VII
`
`L-NMMA
`100mg kg91
`
`L-Arginine
`300mg kg-1
`
`(A) Effect of L-NMMA (100 mg-kg-; i.v.) on blood
`FIG. 2.
`pressure (B.P.) and heart rate (H.R.). Trace is representative ofthree
`experiments, in which the duration of these effects of L-NMMA was
`between 60 and 90 min. (B) Reversal of the effect of L-NMMA (100
`mgkg-'; i.v.) on blood pressure and heart rate by L-arginine (300
`mg-kg-'; i.v.). Trace is representative of three experiments.
`
`Downloaded by guest on May 20, 2021
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Medical Sciences: Rees et aL
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`3377
`
`0.1
`
`0.3
`ACh MM
`
`1
`
`S_
`3
`
`0.1
`
`0.3
`
`1
`
`ACh pM
`
`-
`
`3
`
`A
`
`70r
`60t
`
`50
`
`40
`
`8E
`
`030
`
`20
`
`10
`Al
`
`70r
`601
`
`50
`
`B
`
`2o 40
`E
`
`20
`
`10
`,ft I
`ol
`
`L- ARGINE
`
`1UMT.D.
`
`cminm
`12cm
`
`A.
`
`Aorta
`1 4SC
`RbA
`
`I4sc
`
`-tRbAy
`;
`
`S Cl
`
`b
`C.
`
`t
`5OnM
`N3Gro O.T.
`
`0.1 0.3
`
`1
`
`3
`0.1 0.3
`ACh tiM T.D.
`
`1
`
`3
`
`5OnM
`N3Gro O.T.
`
`e
`B.
`
`Aorta
`4 sec
`
`i
`
`R
`
`a
`
`L-ARGININE lOOjM T.D.
`
`10min
`7 2cm
`
`t
`
`5OnM
`N3Gro O.T.
`
`t
`t
`0-1 0.3
`
`f
`1
`
`f
`0.1 0.3
`3
`ACh UM T.D.
`
`1
`
`3
`
`5OnM
`N3Gro O.T
`
`Effect of L-NMMA on the ex vivo release of NO induced
`FIG. 3.
`by ACh. A segment (6 cm) of the thoracic (donor) aorta was removed
`10 min after treatment with L-NMMA (100 mg-kg-'; i.v.), placed in
`a perspex chamber, and perfused at 5 ml-min1 with Krebs' buffer.
`The effluent was used to superfuse in a cascade two spiral strips of
`rabbit aorta denuded of endothelium (RbA) and submaximally
`contracted with U46619 (30 nM). Atropine (200 nM) was infused over
`the tissues (O.T.) to inhibit the direct effects of ACh administered as
`1-min infusions. (A) Control, untreated rabbit. ACh (0.1-3.0 AM)
`infused through the donor aorta (T.D.) induced the release of NO as
`shown by the relaxations of the bioassay tissues. This release was not
`significantly affected by a continuous infusion of L-arginine (100 AuM)
`through the donor aorta. (B) Rabbit treated with L-NMMA (100
`mgkg-'; i.v.). The release of NO by ACh (0.1-3.0 AM) infused
`through the donor aorta was greatly reduced and was restored by a
`continuous infusion of L-argilnine (100 AM) through the donor aorta.
`Trace is representative of three experiments.
`endothelium and the identification of L-NMMA as a specific
`inhibitor of this pathway (4, 18, 19) has allowed the investi-
`gation of the role of NO in the regulation of blood pressure.
`Intravenous administration of L-NMMA induced a dose-
`dependent enantiomer-specific hypertension and partially
`inhibited the hypotensive action of ACh, but not that of
`n3Gro. Whether L-NMMA affects the uptake or the utiliza-
`tion of arginine by cells is not yet known; however, the
`present data are quantitatively and qualitatively similar to
`those obtained in vitro. Indeed, in vascular strips (4, 18, 19),
`and in the isolated perfused heart ofthe rabbit (20), L-NMMA
`induces an increase in vascular tone and an inhibition of
`endothelium-dependent responses. These actions are due to
`the inhibition of the release of NO, suggesting that the results
`obtained in vivo are also attributable to the same mechanism.
`
`Release of NO from the perfused rabbit aorta detected by
`FIG. 4.
`chemiluminescence. The effluent of the donor aorta was infused
`continuously into a reaction vessel containing 75 ml of 1% sodium
`iodide in glacial acetic acid under reflex. NO was removed under
`reduced pressure in a stream of N2 and mixed with ozone; the
`chemiluminescent product was quantified by reference to NO stan-
`dards. (A) Control, untreated rabbit. Release of NO by ACh (0.1-3.0
`,LM; 1-min infusions) in the absence (u) and presence (X) of a
`continuous infusion of L-arginine (100 ILM). (B) Rabbit treated with
`L-NMMA (100 mg-kg-'; i.v.) 10 min prior to removal of the aorta.
`Release of NO by ACh (0.1-3.0 tiM) in the absence (r) and presence
`(n) ofa continuous infusion of L-arginine (100 tiM). Each value is the
`mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. *, P < 0.05.
`
`The effect of L-NMMA in vivo was slow to disappear
`unless accelerated by a 3-fold molar excess of exogenous
`L-arginine, reinforcing our suggestion (4, 18) that L-NMMA
`is a competitive inhibitor of the NO-forming enzyme(s).
`Furthermore, this effect could also be demonstrated ex vivo
`where the inhibition of the formation of NO observed after
`treatment with L-NMMA was reversed by an infusion of
`L-arginine. These findings suggest that there is a continuous
`utilization of L-arginine for the enzymic formation of NO by
`resistance arteries and provide the first evidence that NO
`formation contributes to the regulation of blood pressure.
`The failure of L-arginine to affect blood pressure directly is
`also consistent with observations in conduit and in resistance
`vessels in vitro (4, 20, 24) and endothelial cells in culture (16),
`which suggest that under normal conditions there is sufficient
`endogenous L-arginine to saturate the NO-forming enzyme.
`More L-NMMA was necessary to inhibit the hypotension
`induced by ACh than to increase the blood pressure, sug-
`gesting that during stimulation with ACh there is an increased
`mobilization of L-arginine, the antagonism of which requires
`more L-NMMA. These results are consistent with those
`obtained in vascular rings in vitro, where more L-NMMA
`was required to inhibit ACh-induced relaxation than to
`increase basal tone (4).
`
`Downloaded by guest on May 20, 2021
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`3378
`
`Medical Sciences: Rees et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`Rosenblum, W. I., Nelson, G. H. & Povlishock, J. T. (1987)
`Circ. Res. 60, 169-176.
`Sobey, C. G., Woodman, 0. L. & Dusting, G. J. (1988) Clin.
`Exp. Physiol. Pharmacol. 15, 401-410.
`Dudel, C. & Forstermann, U. (1988) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 145,
`217-221.
`Palmer, R. M. J., Ferrige, A. G. & Moncada, S. (1987) Nature
`(London) 327, 524-526.
`Radomski, M. W., Palmer, R. M. J. & Moncada, S. (1987) Br.
`J. Pharmacol. 92, 181-187.
`Radomski, M. W., Palmer, R. M. J. & Moncada, S. (1987)
`Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 148, 1482-1489.
`Ignarro, L. J., Buga, G. M., Wood, K. S., Byrns, R. E. &
`Chaudhuri, G. (1987) Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 9265-
`9269.
`Furchgott, R. F. (1988) in Mechanisms of Vasodilatation, ed.
`Vanhoutte, P. M. (Raven, New York), pp. 401-414.
`Kelm, M., Feelisch, M., Spahr, R., Piper, H.-M., Noack, E. &
`Schrader, J. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 154, 236-
`244.
`Palmer, R. M. J., Ashton, D. S. & Moncada, S. (1988) Nature
`(London) 333, 664-666.
`Schmidt, H. H. H. W., Nau, H., Wittfoht, W., Gerlach, J.,
`Prescher, K.-E., Klein, M. M., Niroomand, F. & Bohme, E.
`(1988) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 154, 213-216.
`Palmer, R. M. J., Rees, D. D., Ashton, D. S. & Moncada, S.
`(1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 153, 1251-1256.
`Sakuma, I., Stuehr, D., Gross, S. S., Nathan, C. & Levi, R.
`(1988) Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8664-8667.
`Amezcua, J. L., De Souza, B. M., Palmer, R. M. J. & Mon-
`cada, S. (1989) Br. J. Pharmacol., in press.
`Patthy, A., Bajusz, S. & Patthy, L. (1977) Acta Biochim.
`Biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 12, 191-196.
`22. Amezcua, J. L., Dusting, G. J., Palmer, R. M. J. & Moncada,
`S. (1988) Br. J. Pharmacol. 95, 830-834.
`Kelm, M. & Schrader, J. (1988) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 155, 313-
`23.
`316.
`24. Thomas, G., Mostaghim, R. & Ramwell, P. W. (1986) Biochem.
`Biophys. Res. Commun. 141, 446-451.
`Luscher, T. F., Diederick, D., Weber, E., Vanhoutte, P. M. &
`Buhler, F. R. (1988) Hypertension 11, 573-578.
`Winquist, R. J., Bunting, P. B., Baskin, E. P. & Wallace,
`A. A. (1984) J. Hypertens. 2, 541-545.
`27. De Mey, J. G. & Gray, S. D. (1985) Prog. Appl. Microcirc. 8,
`181-187.
`Luscher, T. F., Raij, L. & Vanhoutte, P. M. (1987) J. Hyper-
`tens. 5, Suppl. 5, S153-S155.
`Otsuka, U., DiPiero, A., Hirt, B., Brennaman, B. & Lockette,
`W. (1988) Am. J. Physiol. 254, H163-H169.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`The hypertension induced by L-NMMA was accompanied
`by bradycardia and the hypotension induced by ACh and
`n3Gro, in the presence of L-NMMA, was accompanied by
`tachycardia. These effects were small and were also observed
`when the blood pressure was raised by phenylephrine and
`were not affected by the a,-antagonist prazosin or by vagot-
`omy, suggesting that they are reflex in nature rather than a
`direct effect of L-NMMA on heart rate.
`Our results indicate that the vascular endothelium, by
`synthesizing NO from L-arginine, plays a significant role in
`the control of blood pressure. The precise regional hemody-
`namic changes that occur as a result of preventing the
`synthesis of NO by the vascular endothelium require eluci-
`dation.
`A decrease in endothelium-dependent relaxation has been
`observed in vessels from hypertensive animals (25-29),
`although the precise mechanism has not been established. In
`view of our data, it is tempting to speculate that changes in
`the synthesis or the actions of NO in the vasculature may
`either be involved in some forms of hypertension or be one
`of the mechanisms involved in the genesis of hypertension in
`general.
`Whether administration of arginine would be beneficial for
`the treatment of hypertension and whether populations
`consuming a low arginine diet exhibit an increased incidence
`of hypertension should also be investigated. Further work is
`also needed to determine the long-term pathophysiological
`consequences of this way of changing vascular reactivity and
`inducing experimental hypertension.
`
`We are indebted to Dr. Harold Hodson and Richard Beams for the
`synthesis of L- and D-NMMA.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Furchgott, R. F. & Zawadzki, J. V. (1980) Nature (London)
`288, 373-376.
`Furchgott, R. F. (1984) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 24,
`175-197.
`Griffith, T. M., Edwards, D. H., Lewis, M. J., Newby, A. C.
`& Henderson, A. H. (1984) Nature (London) 308, 645-647.
`Rees, D. D., Palmer, R. M. J., Hodson, H. F. & Moncada, S.
`(1989) Br. J. Pharmacol. %, 418-424.
`Holtz, J., Forstermann, U., Pohl, U., Giesler, M. & Bassenge,
`E. (1984) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 6, 1161-1169.
`Angus, J. A., Campbell, G. R., Cocks, T. M. & Manderson,
`J. A. (1983) J. Physiol. (London) 344, 209-222.
`
`Downloaded by guest on May 20, 2021
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket