throbber
:
`
`;
`
`Aug., 1908.
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`;
`
`151
`
`you on behalf of the Cape May County Medical
`Society.”
`
`Dr. Ill expressed the thanks of the So-
`ciety for the welcome accorded them, and
`the good
`could keep
`they
`said that if
`weather a few days longer, they were not
`likely to forget Cape May very soon.
`The Report of the Committee on Hygiene
`and Legislation was read by Dr. Halsey, as
`follows
`
`June 19, 1908.
`To the Medical Society of New Jersey:
`Your Committee on Legislation desire to make
`the following report of their work during the
`past year.
`Early in January at a meeting of the com-
`mittee held in Trenton, it was unanimously de-
`cided that there would be no movement upon
`our part in any way to recognize or legalize
`The committee were unanimous in
`osteopathy.
`their decision that it would be for the best in-
`terest of the medical profession throughout the
`State to be entirely upon the defensive at first
`should the osteopaths introduce their bill, then
`we would meet this with a substitute to be given
`to the committee to which the measure should
`be referred, as a bill which would be entirely
`satisfactory to the medical men of the
`State.
`not make any movement
`The osteopaths
`did
`until the early part of March, when they had a
`bill introduced by Mr. Colgate, of Essex, and
`the Committee on Public
`it was referred to
`Health, of which Mr. Hines of Essex, was Chair-
`The chairman
`of this committee was
`man.
`very favorable to the osteopaths, and he gave
`notice to the Clerk of the House that a hearing
`would be granted on the bill, said notice did not
`appear in the Journal, and was not published
`in the Trenton papers, none of the members of
`the legislative committee had any notice of the
`Dr. Lowery, a member of the as-
`said hearing.
`sembly, and of the Committee on Public Health,
`notified the president of the Medical Society of
`New Jersey, and he with a few physicians from
`Newark appeared in opposition to the bill. Your
`committee on legislation feeling that the medical
`profession throughout the State had been un-
`justly treated, demanded an additional hearing
`on this bill ; after considerable work this hear-
`ing was granted, at which time we had a large
`gathering of physicians from all over the State
`who spoke very forcibly against granting the
`osteopaths the rights and privileges
`of physi-
`cians, until such time as they were qualified. We
`were satisfied that the able opposition to
`this
`measure presented by the
`medical profession
`throughout the State, together with the strong
`representation present, had a very great influence
`upon the committee. The chairman of the com-
`mittee was strongly in favor of reporting the bill
`as presented by the osteopaths, but the majority
`of the committee were against him and were in
`favor of reporting to the House, the substitute
`as decided upon by your committee on legisla-
`The osteopaths then presented their sub-
`tion.
`stitute which gave every osteopath practising in
`the state of New Jersey, the
`right
`register
`to
`with the Secretary of the State a copy of his
`diploma ; when this was done he was legally
`authorized to use the title D. O. We refused to
`accept this substitute, and Mr. Colgate asked the
`
`unanimous consent of the Assembly to withdraw
`the original bill. A careful canvass which we
`made of the House developed the fact that had
`reported by the committee, it
`bill been
`their
`would not have passed the assembly.
`Earlier in the session, a bill was introduced
`known as the Anti-Vivisection bill, which would
`place certain restrictions upon the development of
`scientific medicine, and limit the good work which
`is being done along these lines. We entered a
`very strong protest against the passage of this
`bill and at the hearing which the president of
`from
`our
`standpoint
`society conducted
`this
`many able men from New York City, Philadel-
`phia and various ports of New Jersey, spoke
`against this measure. The argument against the
`bill was so strong that there was nothing upon
`This bill was
`which our opponents could stand.
`This issue must be watched
`never reported.
`an or-
`very carefully in the future as there
`is
`ganized movement all over the country for the
`introduction of such bills and placing very re-
`At the
`strictive measures around vivisection.
`last meeting of the American Medical Association
`this matter was brought up and the Trustees
`were authorized to set aside a certain amount of
`money to assist in the defeat of such measures
`whenever introduced, feeling that if such bills
`should become a law it would hamper medical
`men in making new and valuable discoveries,
`which in the past have so largely been the means
`suffering and prolonging human
`of alleviating
`life.
`While your committee assisted in
`passing
`a
`bill for the re-organization of the State Board
`The
`of Health, it was not satisfactory to us.
`committee were unanimous in their opinion that
`the Lanning bill would come nearer to fulfilling
`the requirements in the State of New Jersey,
`than the present act. We used our best exer-
`to have the board increased from 6 to 8
`tions
`members, the two additional members to be a
`recognized
`and a
`pharmacist
`of
`veterinarian
`This we were unable to accomplish, and
`ability.
`we therefore recommend that the Medical So-
`ciety of New Jersey express their disapproval
`of the provisions of the act of 1908, re-organiz-
`ing the State Board of Health, because said act
`is retrogressive rather than progressive, and be-
`cause of the failure of the act to require that
`the administration of sanitary measures shall be
`supervised mainly by persons having had medical
`training and experience in sanitation. We are
`satisfied that owing to the intimate relationship
`which exists between human and bovine tuber-
`culosis, that it would be impossible to carry to a
`successful issue, a fight for the extermination of
`tuberculosis in this State unless there was a co-
`operation of the veternarians. Owing to the pas-
`sage of the Pure Food and Drug Act a pharma-
`cist should be a member of the State
`Board of
`Health as he would be more capable of thor-
`Your com-
`oughly examining foods and drugs.
`mittee used every exertion to have the law re-
`pealed in regard to the appointment of the pres-
`ent Tuberculosis Commission of this State, for
`the reason that we were of the opinion that this
`matter should be entirely within the province of
`the State Board of Health. The present mode of
`examining cattle in this State is a farce and it
`will not be possible to eradicate bovine tubercu-
`losis until purely scientific measures are adopted.
`In our judgment, this is not possible with the
`present commission, and should be entirely within
`
`Page 167 of 670
`
`

`

`152
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`Aug., 1908.
`
`the province of the Board of Health with a thor-
`oughly competent and scientific veterinarian at its
`head. With the hearty co-operation of the county
`societies throughout the State, we hope to bring
`this thing about at the next session of the legis-
`After the bill for the reorganization of
`lature.
`the State Board of Health had become a law,
`several members of your committee wrote to the
`governor for a hearing before the appointments
`were made and suggested to the governor that in
`his appointments for the new board, there should
`be at least two and preferably three, physicians.
`Notwithstanding that this hearing was desired by
`the president of our society, by your entire com-
`mittee on legislation, and numerous prominent
`medical men throughout the State, it was refused
`by the governor on the ground that it was un-
`necessary, as he proposed that in making his se-
`lection for members of the incoming Board of
`Health that they should be business men and
`that he should be guided by the wishes of the
`The chair-
`senators from the several counties.
`man of the committee wrote to the governor that
`our aim in asking for this hearing was a purely
`unselfish one and that we thought we might be of
`some assistance in suggesting medical men of
`ability, who in view of the great advancement
`which has been made in hygiene and sanitation
`within the last few years, would place this board
`upon the proper footing and one which would
`compare favorably with the best Boards of Health
`throughout the country.
`Notwithstanding this,
`the hearing was refused, and we have to-day, on
`the State Board of Health of New Jersey, only
`one physician.
`Your committee assisted the State Board of
`Medical Examiners in passing some slight amend-
`ments to the present medical law which were
`needed badly to meet certin conditions.
`While
`as a whole our work has been fairly satisfactory
`during the past year, it has not been what it
`should be. This is largely the result of not being
`thoroughly organized.
`In the broadest sense, your
`committee on legislation has tried to build up
`and strengthen the influence and standing of the
`profession in every community by bringing us all
`into closer touch with each other, and when the
`time is ripe for rapid action, that we could act
`as a hamonious whole for the accomplishment of
`what we deem good for the profession and the
`community at large.
`There is no doubt in our
`mind that the time is ripe when the medical pro-
`fession, working through the organization, should
`become one of the dominant factors in the public
`life for the conservation of the lives and health
`of the public. We are satisfied that the intelligent
`laymen should understand something of the work
`of the physicians, its difficulties, possibilities and
`limitations, and that the laymen and physician
`may co-operate and thus limit as far as possible,
`the ravages of disease and death.
`After this is done we are sure that in a very
`short time a physician will be looked upon as a
`public health officer, educated and trained to pro-
`tect the lives and 'health of the laity. From our
`observation in the legislature during the last few
`years, we have found many men who were will-
`ing to listen to our argument and when the stand-
`ing of the medical profession on any measure, was
`thoroughly explained to them, and it was shown
`that we were unselfish and only working for the
`public good, were ready and willing to do any-
`thing to co-operate with us. The time is ripe for
`a systematic plan of organization and education
`
`and when this is developed as it should be, in our
`judgment, there will be no necessity for your com-
`mittee on legislation to spend so many hours in
`the capitol of the State at Trenton, using their
`utmost endeavors to convince the members of the
`legislature ; but an intelligent public will demand
`that all these matters be referred to the medical
`men for their sanction and approval, before such
`measures would dare become a law. The medical
`profession is held in less esteem than the profes-
`sion in theology and law, with reference to the
`neglected duties of citizenship, those of our pro-
`fession who have no apparent concern in public
`affairs, who devote their time and thought wholly
`to the practice of their calling, negligent or indif-
`ferent to their duties as citizens or influential mem-
`bers of the body of political men, are not adding
`as they should to the enhancement of the station
`in medicine.
`If every county society will promise to take up
`this work of bringing into, closer touch, the laity
`and the medical men and create a clear under-
`standing between them, it will be doing a mag-
`nificent work. We must have intelligent co-opera-
`tion with the laity if we desire an enactment of
`needed legislation, the control of contagious dis-
`eases and prevention of consumption, and the re-
`If we do not start this
`duction of the death rate.
`campaign of education to enlighten the laity, we'
`will have no right to complain if the public de-
`rives its knowledge of medical matters from the
`newspaper advertisements and the patent medi-
`cine circulars gotten up for free distribution.
`It has been our custom for several years to
`have a representative of the Medical Society of
`New Jersey at Trenton, after the bills were in-
`troduced, which in our judgment, needed atten-
`tion. He watched carefully all legislation, inter-
`viewed the members, made poll of the legislature
`and kept your committee fairly in touch with the
`movement of all bills during the session.
`Legis-
`lative matters are growing to such an extent that,
`in our judgment, we should have some one on the
`ground from the opening of the session to its
`If the proper person is obtained, he can
`close.
`assist greatly in shaping legislation and do much
`good in passing such measures that we may be
`interested in, or preventing the passage of vicious
`legislation. We have had such a man, but his
`salary has been a very meagre one, in comparison
`to what he accomplished, or in comparison to
`what the osteopaths paid a man for similar work,
`and we advise that the committee be empowered
`to employ a man, paying him a proper compensa-
`tion for his work, during the coming session of
`There will be so many more
`the legislature.
`matters that will need our attention that this thing
`seems to be absolutely necessary.
`Your committee would suggest that they receive
`the full support of the State Society in having
`passed, at the next session of the legislature, more
`stringent laws if possible than now exists on our
`statutes, for the stamping out of tuberculosis and
`endeavor to have, as in Pennsylvania and New
`York, a substantial sum appropriated by the State
`to assist in the work for the purpose of establish-
`ing public dispensaries, compulsory notification and
`a systematic plan for the education of the masses.
`Your committee would urge upon the State Medi-
`cal Society, the importance of recommending to
`the various county societies, their taking up of
`the question of educating the public concerning
`vital medical matters and thus be prepared to
`carry on the more complete work which will soon
`
`Page 168 of 670
`
`

`

`:
`
`;
`
`Aug., 1908.
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`153
`
`be asked of them by the American Medical Asso-
`ciation. Your committee again calls your attention
`to the serious consideration by county medical
`societies of the necessity of electing medical men
`One good physician in the
`to the legislature.
`legislature is a tower of strength against vicious
`measures that may be introduced. The thanks of
`the Society are due to the two physicians who
`were members of the assembly during the last
`session, Doctors Ramsay and Lowrey. They were
`ever alert to our interests, keeping us well in-
`formed as to the status of various measures and
`as to the proper course to pursue. Their mission-
`ary work among the members should be highly
`commended and we are satisfied that their influ-
`It has left an
`ence will be felt for a long time.
`impression in the halls of legislation that our aim
`is purely for the benefit of the public—the allevia-
`tion of suffering, and the lessening of mortality.
`A report to you would not be complete without
`mentioning the noble work of two senators, Hon.
`Joseph S. Frelinghuysen and Hon. J. Boyd Avis.
`Senator Frelinghuysen was our champion, never
`too busy to give us advice or assist your com-
`mittee. He is a firm believer in upholding the
`high medical standard of the State and to him
`the Society owes a debt of gratitude.
`Senator
`Avis drafted our substitute and was always at the
`call of the committee for suggestions as to the
`As we were
`proper course for us to pursue.
`authorized to employ counsel, the committee re-
`tained him, but under no consideration would he
`take a fee. He informed the chairman that the
`work he had done was a pleasure and a duty.
`This is certainly a good omen for the future, when
`two prominent members of the legislature are
`willing to heartily co-operate with the medical
`men of the state for upholding the medical laws
`and preventing quackery from gaining a foothold
`within our borders, and contending that it
`is
`their duty to assist in doing everything possible to
`lower the death rate in the state.
`They are certainly able cohorts of ours in what
`is to be the great fight of the future—preventive
`medicine—and we should always hold them in
`grateful remembrance.
`During the past year, the committee lost one of
`its valuable members, Dr. A. K. Baldwin, of New-
`Dr. Baldwin was an earnest worker in the
`ark.
`cause of medical education, was always present at
`the meetings of the committee and worked zeal-
`ously to assist in the upholding of the medical
`laws of the State. We feel that we have lost a
`valuable member in his death. At the suggestion
`of your committee, Dr. John W. Bennett, of Long
`Branch, was elected to fill the vacancy.
`Dr. Ben-
`nett is a man of wide experience in legislative
`matters and has given us valuable advice and has
`been very zealous in assisting in the work during
`the past winter. He should, by all means, be
`retained as a member of this committee.
`In selec-
`tion of members of this important committee of
`the Medical Society of New Jersey, as well as
`members of the auxiliary legislative committee,
`only men should be selected who have a taste for
`the work and are willing to devote their time to
`The chairman of the com-
`good honest labor.
`mittee wishes to thank the medical profession
`throughout the State for the co-operation that
`was given at the last hearing against the osteo-
`pathic bill. While he feels that much more might
`have been accomplished than has been done, if
`there were united action on the part of all county
`societies in any measure which your committee on
`
`legislation desires help. As to the members of
`the committee, Dr. Gray was present until sick-
`ness prevented him meeting with the committee
`during the latter part of the session. He did
`good work and was of valuable assistance to us.
`Dr. Schauffler also was present whenever possible
`and succeeded in bringing valuable pressure to
`bear upon the members of the legislature from
`his county, that was of valuable assistance to us
`Dr. H. H. Davis was always
`during the session.
`present at the meetings of the committee, and the
`chairman feels that too much praise cannot be
`given to him for his unselfish devotion to the
`interest of the medical profession of the State.
`The work of the chairman of the committee has
`been largely one of duty and he feels that it only
`repays in a small degree the many honors that the
`Medical Society of New Jersey has given him,
`and with a heartfelt desire to see the medical
`men of the State united for their elevation and
`the proper recognition by the laity of our high
`and unselfish aim, the alleviation of human suf-
`fering, the prevention of all forms of quackery,
`and the education of the masses so that they will
`be mighty factors in the prevention of diseases.
`We trust that the medical profession through-
`out the State may be thoroughly organized that
`it will not only commence, but bring to a high de-
`gree of development, the work of organization,
`the education of the laity and the co-operation of
`the other professions for the betterment of hy-
`gienic and sanitary conditions
`throughout
`the
`State, which will ever redown to the honor and
`glory of this grand old Medical Society of New
`Jersey.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`L. M. HaesEy, Chairman,
`F. D. Gray,
`Wm. G. SchaueeeEr,
`John W. Bennett,
`Henry H. Davis.
`
`Dr. Halsey said that he would like to
`have the
`suggestions
`in this report
`as
`adopted by the Board of Trustees, as well
`as the other recommendations, taken up and
`acted upon by the Society.
`It was moved and seconded that the re-
`port be received.
`Carried.
`Dr. D. C. English made a motion that
`He
`recommendations
`adopted.
`be
`the
`wished also to offer a resolution, as he felt
`that the time had arrived for the Medical
`Society of New Jersey, with its record of
`having looked after the health interests of
`the State, to speak in no uncertain terms.
`It therefore afforded him much pleasure to
`offer these resolutions, which he would like
`to see adopted by a unanimous vote. They
`were as follows
`
`Whereas, the Legislature of this State at the
`last session enacted a law which has made possi-
`ble political appointments to the sanitary service
`of the State, regardless of the professional train-
`ing and scientific attainments of the appointees
`and
`Whereas, the best sanitary service thus far ren-
`dered in any State in the Union has been per-
`formed under the direction of a liberally compen-
`
`Page 169 of 670
`
`

`

`i54
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`Aug., 1908.
`
`sated Commissioner of Health and a corps of
`skilled advisors, therefore,
`Society of New
`Resolved, That the Medical
`Jersey in annual meeting assembled, hereby advo-
`cates and strongly recommends the repeal of the
`present act governing the administration of the
`laws relating to the public health, and urges the
`enactment of a law which will provide for the
`appointment of a Commissioner of Health, who
`shall be a physician of not less than ten years’
`experience as a practitioner, with adequate salary
`to secure the best attainable service, and to pro-
`vide also for a competent advisory board, ap-
`pointed by the commissioner and to serve without
`pay, except for actual expenses incurred.
`Resolved, That a special committee of five mem-
`bers of the society be appointed by the chair to
`consider the so-called Canning Bill and decide
`whether it, or some modification of it, will best
`conserve the health interests of our State ; keep
`these sacred interests free from improper political
`control or manipulation and maintain the honor
`and reputation of our State for safeguarding the
`health and lives of our citizens ; and that said
`committee report to the Board of Trustees at a
`special meeting to be held in the early fall; and
`that the committee in co-operation with the com-
`mittee on legislation be and they are hereby auth-
`orized and empowered to advocate in the name of
`this Society, and to secure if possible, the enact-
`ment of such measures as shall be agreed upon
`by them and endorsed by the Board of Trustees.
`
`Dr. English then said that he had offered
`these resolutions because he believed that
`the members of the Medical Society of New
`Jersey were deeply interested in the matter,
`the Society having been the father of all
`legislation in the State to put the health in-
`terests under organized authority.
`In the
`6o’s, the Society went before the legislature
`and the governor and urged the necessity
`of a law for the protection of the health and
`lives of the citizens of New Jersey.
`That
`committee went before the governor and
`the legislature, year after year, asking and
`entreating for the passage of an adequate
`They were turned down each time.
`law.
`They could do little with the legislatures,
`and saw that the only hope was in going
`to the people and awakening a public sen-
`timent that would compel the legislature
`to listen to the pleadings of the Medical
`Society of New Jersey. A public meeting
`was called, and was addressed by some of
`A
`the veteran members of this Society.
`State Sanitary Society was formed.
`Dr.
`Ezra M. Hunt, of blessed memory, went
`before the farmers and pleaded with them
`for the health interests of the State ; and a
`sentiment was aroused that compelled the
`legislature and the governor to listen to
`the entreaties of the Medical Society ; so
`that, after long years of effort, they secured
`a State Board of Health, which has ever
`since blessed the State and its citizens.
`
`suggested an
`Dr. English
`outline for
`action, and intimated that something like
`the Banning bill would be a good law to
`enact, although he did not feel sure that
`it was the best that could be framed. He
`had given a great deal of attention to the
`matter, and thought it would be well to fol-
`low the example of the state of Pennsyl-
`vania, where the health interests are bet-
`ter guarded than in any other State in the
`Dr. Dixon, the Health Commis-
`Union.
`been
`appointment,
`since his
`sioner, has,
`doing magnificent work, such as appeals to
`the citizens of Pennsylvania ; and the leg-
`islature has given the health authorities the
`right to spend one million dollars in pro-
`tecting the health interests of that State.
`New Jersey should not occupy a second
`She should stand at the front in
`place.
`sanitary legislation and administration ; and
`the Society should insist upon having the
`health interests of the citizens of the state
`of New Jersey guarded and protected, as
`they cannot be when the medical profession
`has been ignored in selecting members of
`the Board of Health, as has been done
`under the law just passed.
`Dr. English said that, from the very
`start, he had not liked the law that was in-
`troduced and passed at the last session of
`the New Jersey Legislature. He regarded
`the paying of the members of that board
`two thousand dollars a year as a step toward
`There had been, he
`political manipulation.
`board who
`on the
`said, gentlemen
`old
`served without salary, merely having their
`actual expenses paid ; and he thought that
`there was every reason to believe that these,
`or other men as good or possibly better,
`could be procured to give similar service
`But when men are
`without compensation.
`appointed to this office to which there is a
`salary attached, it is made possible for the
`politicians to select men who will contri-
`bute liberally to campaign purposes or in
`other ways serve the politician or political
`party that secures them the position.
`Dr. English said that he had nothing to
`say personally against the gentlemen who
`had been appointed, except that they were
`not men with medical training or exper-
`This,
`ienced in sanitary administration.
`however, was the one vital point in the dis-
`cussion ; and it did seem to him that a Board
`of Health should consist of at least three
`able medical men, the business men, en-
`But he
`gineers, etc., making up the rest.
`very decidedly preferred the passage of a
`new law which shall provide for a single
`head—a Commissioner of Health, the best,
`
`Page 170 of 670
`
`

`

`Aug., 1908.
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`155
`
`most competent one obtainable, even if $10,-
`000 salary is required, and an advisory
`board of competent unsalaried men.
`Dr. Walter B. Johnson,
`Paterson,
`of
`seconded the motion for the adoption of
`He agreed with Dr.
`these resolutions.
`English in hoping that the Society would
`put itself on record in such a forcible way
`that the governor of New Jersey would feel
`it. He had understood from the committee
`on hygiene and legislation that the gov-
`ernor had made the statement that he would
`make his own appointments.
`Dr. Johnson
`did not think it necessary for a great society
`Medical
`of
`the
`that
`Society
`of
`like
`New Jersey
`governor
`attack
`the
`to
`or the members of the Board of Health
`been appointed ;
`has
`but he
`that
`did
`think it necessary for the Society to come
`forward and place itself in the situation in
`which it originally was, that of demanding
`of the governor that the health measures
`be placed in the hands of
`the physician.
`They always had been in the hands of the
`physician, and always should be.
`Health
`measures would never
`have been
`under-
`taken, had the work necessary to start them
`fallen to the lot of lawyers or other pro-
`fessional men, except physicians.
`It is only
`the self-sacrificing physician, working in the
`interests of the public, who is willing to
`give time and energy to measures that look
`to the public good. When, in the appoint-
`ment of a Board of Health, the governor
`of New Jersey ignores the members of the
`State Medical Society, Dr. Johnson thought
`it time for the Society to feel that it had
`been imposed upon, and that proper meas-
`ures had not been taken to safeguard the
`health of the communities represented by
`the Society, the members of which are will-
`ing and anxious to do this work, and had
`been before there was any salary attached
`to it.. Now that a salary is attached to these
`positions, they have become a part of the
`political machine ,and something that peo-
`Members of the medical
`ple strive for.
`profession are proud to be associated with
`members of a board of health that does
`good work.
`If this kind of legislation is
`to carry these boards into the realms of
`politics, however, Dr. Johnson thought that
`others who did not have the health of the
`communities at heart would be seeking these
`He believed that a retrograde
`positions.
`step had been taken in going back from the
`old situation in which the health board
`served without compensation, in a manner
`according to the bill drawn up by Judge
`Lanning which he considered the proper
`
`measure.
`
`Dr. Johnson argued strongly in
`favor of a single head—a Commissioner of
`Health—which the Judge’s bill provided for
`and Dr. English’s resolutions endorsed. He
`took pleasure in seconding the resolutions,
`and hoped that they would be placed in the
`hands of the governor in such a manner
`that he and the legislature might know that
`the Medical Society of New Jersey was
`looking into the best methods to be adopted
`to subserve the interests of the health of
`the State.
`Dr. Britton D. Evans, of Morris Plains,
`said that he had arisen to a point of order.
`One set of resolutions had been regularly
`presented, and another set was put forward
`The first having been sec-
`for adoption.
`onded, he thought the second set out of
`order.
`Dr. Ill said that the second set of reso-
`lutions were only confirmatory of the reso-
`lution offered by the committee.
`Dr. Halsey said that what he had pre-
`sented was not a resolution, but a recom-
`mendation.
`Dr. Evans thought the second set entirely
`out of order. The resolutions of the Com-
`mittee on Hygiene and Legislation were ad-
`mirable and well supported.
`Dr. Halsey said that Dr. Evans was mis-
`taken in considering the recommendations
`of the Committee a resolution. The resolu-
`tions framed by Dr. English were prepared
`according to the recommendations of the
`committee.
`Dr. Evans said that in that case his hear-
`ing must be poor. He asked, for his own
`information and for that of others who did
`not hear any better than himself, that Dr.
`Halsey read the report of the Committee
`on Hygiene and Legislation again.
`Dr. Halsey said that it had been brought
`before the House and duly seconded.
`Dr. Ill said that the Chair would rule
`that the recommendations from the com-
`mittee were in the form of a resolution, and
`had been duly seconded.
`Dr. Halsey said that Dr. English had *
`been requested to draw up this resolution.
`Dr. English said that he had been re-
`quested to draw up a resolution to carry
`out the recommendations of the committee.
`Dr. Evans said that no one had men-
`tioned that. The resolutions offered by the
`committee had not been disposed of, and he
`wished to know whether those of Dr. Eng-
`lish were a substitute for them.
`Dr. Halsey said that it seemed to him
`that the proper solution of the difficulty
`would be to attend to the recommendations
`
`Page 171 of 670
`
`

`

`156
`
`Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.
`
`Aug ip 08.
`
`of the committee first, and then let the mat-
`ter of Dr. English’s come up a secondary
`resolution.
`Dr. English then temporarily withdrew
`his resolutions.
`Dr. Evans said that he would accept that
`method of disposing of the matter, but that
`he still maintained that he was correct from
`a parliamentary standpoint.
`Dr. Ill announced that the recommenda-
`committee on legislation,
`of
`the
`tions
`which had been approved by the Board of
`The re-
`Trustees were before the house.
`commendations were then adopted.
`Dr. English, then again offered his reso-
`lutions, which were seconded by Dr. John-
`son.
`Dr. William E. Ramsay, of Perth Am-
`boy, said that he had had the pleasure of
`working for this bill that was under dis-
`cussion during the last term of the legis-
`lature, although he had done so under a
`If he had it to work for
`misrepresentation.
`to-day, he believed that he would work in
`The representation
`an opposite direction.
`made to him from all sources was that the
`governor was going to recognize not only
`the State Medical Society, but the medical
`In discussing the resolution
`profession.
`just suggested by Dr. English, ten years ex-
`perience had been mentioned as necessary.
`Dr. Ramsay agreed to that, but he would
`like to have added that a man should be in
`The man selected by the
`active practice.
`governor had not been in practice for fif-
`This he considered
`teen or eighteen years.
`not only unfair, but a direct rebuff ; and
`he felt no hesitation in saying that a good
`deal of medical legislation that had caused
`so much trouble during past years had been
`due to the inactivity of the profession as a
`whole. The Society should, he said, be con-
`gratulated on the work done by the legis-
`lative committee of last year; but if the
`Society expects the endorsement of the sen-
`ate and assembly of New Jersey, to
`say
`nothing of the governor, it would be nec-
`essary for them to take a more active part
`It was only during the
`in public affairs.
`antivivisection trouble that the profession
`as a whole had become positively active.
`Medical legislation had then been brought
`in to such a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket