throbber
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2351
`
`Review
`Nitrate in vegetables: toxicity, content, intake
`and EC regulation
`Pietro Santamaria∗
`
`Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Vegetali, University of Bari, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy
`
`Abstract: Nitrate content is an important quality characteristic of vegetables. Vegetable nitrate content is
`of interest to governments and regulators owing to the possible implications for health and to check that
`controls on the content are effective. Nitrate itself is relatively non-toxic but its metabolites may produce
`a number of health effects. Until recently nitrate was perceived as a purely harmful dietary component
`which causes infantile methaemoglobinaemia, carcinogenesis and possibly even teratogenesis. Recent
`research studies suggest that nitrate is actually a key part of our bodies’ defences against gastroenteritis.
`In this review are reported: (1) vegetable classification as a function of nitrate accumulation; (2) vegetable
`contribution to the total dietary exposure of nitrate; (3) European Commission Regulation No. 563/2002
`which sets limits for nitrate in lettuce and spinach; (4) the maximum levels set in some countries for
`beetroot, cabbage, carrot, celery, endive, Lamb’s lettuce, potato, radish and rocket; (5) the results of
`surveys on the nitrate content of vegetables in Italy and other European countries.
` 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
`
`Keywords: nitrate content; nitrate toxicity; vegetable quality; limits for nitrate
`
`compounds, which form when nitrite binds to other
`substances before or after ingestion (for example, the
`amines derived from proteins), are toxic and can
`lead to severe pathologies in humans.8,9 Thus, the
`assessment of the health risk of nitrate to humans
`should encompass the toxicity of both nitrite and
`N-nitroso compounds.8
`Sources of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds
`are normally exogenous,10 but endogenous formation
`of these compounds has also been demonstrated in
`both laboratory animals and humans.2
`The best-known effect of nitrite is its ability to react
`with haemoglobin (oxyHb) to form methaemoglobin
`(metHb) and nitrate:
`− + oxyHb(Fe2+
`
`NO2
`
`) −−−→ metHb(Fe3+
`
`) + NO3
`
`−
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Nitrate is a naturally occurring form of nitrogen
`and is an integral part of
`the nitrogen cycle in
`the environment. Nitrate is formed from fertilizers,
`decaying plants, manure and other organic residues.
`It is found in the air, soil, water and food (particularly
`in vegetables) and is produced naturally within the
`human body.1 – 4 It is also used as a food additive,
`mainly as a preservative and antimicrobial agent.3,4 It
`is used in foods such as cheese and cheese products,
`raw and processed meats, edible casings, processed
`fish, fish products, spirits and liqueurs.
`Due to the increased use of synthetic nitrogen fer-
`tilizers and livestock manure in intensive agriculture,
`vegetables and drinking water may contain higher
`concentrations of nitrate than in the past.
`
`NITRATE TOXICITY
`The presence of nitrate in vegetables, as in water and
`generally in other foods, is a serious threat to man’s
`health. Nitrate per se is relatively non-toxic,3,5 but
`approximately 5% of all ingested nitrate is converted
`in saliva and the gastrointestinal tract to the more toxic
`nitrite.6,7 The only chronic toxic effects of nitrate
`are those resulting from the nitrite formed by its
`reduction by bacterial enzymes.5 Nitrite and N-nitroso
`
`As a consequence of the formation of metHb the
`oxygen delivery to tissue is impaired.11,5
`Once the proportion of metHb reaches 10%
`of normal Hb levels, clinical
`symptoms
`(from
`cyanosis—the blue discoloration of
`the skin due
`to the presence of deoxygenated blood—through
`to asphyxia—suffocation) occur. This potentially
`fatal condition is known as methaemoglobinaemia,
`or blue baby syndrome.1,11 Children and adults
`are far
`less susceptible to methaemoglobinaemia
`
`∗ Correspondence to: Pietro Santamaria, Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Vegetali, University of Bari, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126
`Bari, Italy
`E-mail: santamap@agr.uniba.it
`(Received 23 July 2004; revised version received 9 February 2005; accepted 29 June 2005)
`Published online 1 November 2005
` 2005 Society of Chemical Industry. J Sci Food Agric 0022–5142/2005/$30.00
`
`10
`
`Human Power of N Company
`
`EX1024
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`the induction of
`than young infants, because of
`methaemoglobin reductase during the physiological
`post-weaning period. Babies less than three months old
`are particularly susceptible to methaemoglobinaemia.
`This is believed to occur because of infants’ higher
`levels of
`fetal oxyHb still present
`in the blood,
`which oxidizes to metHb more readily than non-
`fetal oxyHb. In addition,
`infants have less of the
`reductase needed to reconvert the metHb back to
`oxyHb, have a proportionately higher intake of nitrate
`through drinking water by body weight, and have a
`higher reduction of nitrate to nitrite due to low gastric
`acidity.5,12
`Two cases of blue baby syndrome were recently
`investigated in Wisconsin (USA). Both cases involved
`infants who became ill after being fed formula that
`was reconstituted with water from private wells. Water
`samples collected from these wells during the infants’
`illnesses contained nitrate N concentrations of 22.9
`−1.11
`and 27.4 mg L
`Nitrite as such, and nitrate when reduced to
`nitrite, may react with amines or amides to form
`carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds.5 Nitrosation can
`occur mainly in two situations: (1) during storage and
`ripening of the food product1 and (2) in the stomach
`from the action of salivary nitrite produced through
`enzymatic reduction of endogenous or exogenous
`nitrate.13 Since the discovery of the carcinogenicity
`of N-nitrosodimethylamine in rats by Magee and
`Barnes,14 N-nitroso compounds have been shown to
`be carcinogenic in more than 40 animal species.2
`These include mammals, birds, reptiles and fish, and
`there is no reason to suspect that human beings are
`uniquely resistant.15
`Several authors have suggested that the risk for the
`development of stomach cancer is positively correlated
`with three factors: (1) the nitrate level of drinking
`water, (2) the urinary excretion of nitrate and (3) the
`occurrence of atrophic gastritis.8 Epidemiological
`studies have not provided any evidence that there is an
`increased risk of cancer related to high nitrate intake
`from sources other than vegetables.2 In some cases
`studies revealed a negative correlation between nitrate
`intake and gastric cancer,2,16,17 because vegetables
`are an excellent source of vitamins, minerals and
`biologically active compounds.18,19
`Some years ago, Vermeer et al.20
`showed the
`endogenous formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso com-
`pounds (N-nitrosodimethylamine and N-nitrosopi-
`peridine) after intake of nitrate at the acceptable daily
`intake (ADI, see below) level in combination with a
`fish meal rich in amines as nitrosatable precursors.
`The vegetables used in the research (cauliflower, peas,
`carrots and green beans) were low in nitrate, and
`their mean vitamin C content (an anti-carcinogenic
`−1 vegetables.
`agent) was approximately 170 mg kg
`Thus, the amount of vitamin C (and other antiox-
`idants) in these vegetables appeared insufficient to
`prevent nitrosamine formation.20 The same Danish
`research group has shown that nitrate can interfere
`
`Nitrate in vegetables
`
`with iodine uptake by the thyroid, resulting in hyper-
`trophy of the thyroid, the gland responsible for many
`of the body’s endocrine and hormonal functions.21
`More recently, another research group has shown
`a positive relationship between the incidence of
`childhood-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
`and levels of nitrate in drinking water.22 Their findings
`−1 of
`suggest that the threshold for the effect is 15 mg L
`NO3 (less than one-third of the EC limit for nitrate in
`drinking water), which is considered both worrying23
`and puzzling.24
`Recent research suggests that dietary nitrate may
`have beneficial effects, based on the hypothesis that
`nitric oxide (NO) formed in the stomach from dietary
`nitrate has antimicrobial effects on gut pathogens and
`a role in host defence.12,25,26
`The potential beneficial effects of nitrate have been
`the subject of limited research; however, there was
`enough evidence in several areas including prevention
`of microbial
`infections, reduction of hypertension
`and cardiovascular diseases, and reduction in the
`risk of gastric cancer, to lead two researchers to
`publish a paper entitled ‘Are you taking your
`nitrate?’24
`Finally, it is important to cite the text ‘Nitrate
`and man: toxic, harmless or beneficial?’ which, as
`suggested by the title, is a broad-ranging review of the
`role of nitrate in human health.27 The authors critically
`review the evidence relating to the reported adverse
`effects of nitrate and note that a plausible hypothesis
`(the toxicity of nitrate) has been transformed into a
`practically sacrosanct dogma, in spite of the lack of
`proof.27
`However, an intake of vegetables and consumption
`of drinking water with such a high nitrate content that
`the ADI is exceeded for a prolonged period should
`be avoided.28 Thus, in order to gain as much as
`possible from the indisputable benefits of vegetables,
`a reduction in nitrate levels is highly desirable for
`consumers and probably profitable for farmers.29
`
`ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE
`The concept of ADI is defined by the Joint Expert
`Committee of the Food and Agriculture (JECFA)
`Organization of the United Nations/World Health
`Organization (WHO) for substances intentionally
`added to food or
`for contaminants
`(pesticides,
`herbicides and fertilizers).3,4 In view of the well-
`known benefits of vegetables and the lack of data
`on the possible effects of vegetable matrices on the
`bioavailability of nitrate, JECFA considered it to be
`inappropriate to compare exposure to nitrate from
`vegetables with ADI or to derive limits for nitrate
`in vegetables directly from it.3 In the absence of an
`appropriate alternative approach in the literature the
`consequences of nitrate intake exceeding the ADI are
`discussed.
`The JECFA and the European Commission’s
`Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) have set an
`−1 bodyweight.3,4,30 – 32
`ADI for NO3 of 0–3.7 mg kg
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`
`11
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Table 1. Estimated intakes of NO3 from sources other than food additives at the global level (after Hambridge34)
`Major contributors to total intake (µg mg−1)
`
`Intake
`−1)
`(mg day
`
`40
`28
`20
`55
`155
`
`ADIa
`(µg mg−1)
`200
`100
`100
`250
`700
`
`P Santamaria
`
`Regional diet
`
`Middle Eastern
`Far Eastern
`African
`Latin American
`European
`
`a Based on 60 kg body weight.
`
`The USA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
`Reference Dose (RfD) for nitrate is 1.6 mg nitrate
`−1 bodyweight (bw) per day (equivalent to
`nitrogen kg
`−1 bw per day).5
`about 7.0 mg NO3 kg
`The JECFA and SCF have proposed an ADI for
`−1 bw32,
`NO2 of 0–0.078,9 and 0–0.06 mg NO2 kg
`respectively, while the EPA has set an RfD of
`−1 bw per day (equivalent
`0.1 mg nitrite nitrogen kg
`−1 bw per day).5
`to 0.33 mg NO2 kg
`The SCF retains that the ADIs are applicable to all
`sources of dietary exposure.30,31
`
`NITRATE INTAKE
`The three main sources of nitrate intakes are
`vegetables, water and cured meat.1,33
`Vegetables constitute the major dietary source of
`nitrate, generally providing from 300 to 940 mg g−1
`of the daily dietary intake (Tables 1 and 2). Their
`contribution to nitrite intake is low, and in fact lower
`than that from cured meat products.1,10,33 Nitrite
`−1
`is found in plant foodstuffs, typically 1–2 mg kg
`of fresh vegetable weight.46 Potatoes, however, can
`−1.46 Higher amounts of
`contain up to 60 mg NO2 kg
`
`Table 2. Estimate of nitrate daily intake (drinking water not included)
`and contribution of vegetables in various countries
`
`Country
`
`NO3 (mg
`person−1)
`148a
`Belgium
`European Union 18–131b
`Finland
`77
`France
`121
`Germany
`68
`
`Italy
`Poland
`Spain
`Sweden
`
`149
`65–85
`60
`50
`
`The Netherlands
`UK
`USA
`
`52
`95
`73
`
`Vegetable
`contri-
`butionc
`(µg mg−1)
`93
`100
`92
`85
`72
`
`90
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`94
`90
`
`a Included only vegetables and fruit.
`b Included only vegetables.
`c Not detected.
`
`12
`
`Reference
`
`Dejonckheere et al.35
`SCF32
`Dich et al.36
`Corn ´ee et al.37
`Selenka and
`Brand-Grimm38
`CSS39
`Borawska et al.40
`ACAPV41
`Jagerstad and
`Nilsson42
`Ellen et al.43
`Knight et al.44
`NRC45
`
`Vegetables
`
`Water
`
`Cereals
`
`650
`450
`300
`650
`900
`
`200
`300
`400
`150
`50
`
`100
`150
`150
`50
`<50
`
`Fruit
`
`50
`100
`100
`100
`50
`
`nitrite are found in contaminated food or in broken
`vegetable tissues in food stored for several days at
`room temperature.33
`Compared with the current ADIs, the ingestion
`of only 100 g of
`raw vegetables with a nitrate
`−1 will already lead to an
`concentration of 2500 mg kg
`intake of 250 mg NO3. Consuming this item alone, for
`a person of 60 kg, would exceed the ADI for nitrate by
`13%. Calculating in the partial conversion of nitrate to
`nitrite (5%) after such consumption, the current SCF
`−1 bw) would be exceeded
`ADI for nitrite (0.06 mg kg
`by 247%.
`A statistical exposure model has shown that in
`the adult population in the Netherlands 15% had
`daily intakes regularly exceeding the ADI;47 in young
`children this may rise to 45%.47
`In its last report, the SCF32 reviewed from a public
`health standpoint the presence of nitrate in foodstuffs
`in general, and vegetables in particular, and stated that
`the total intake of nitrate is normally well below the
`acceptable daily intake (Table 2). The major sources
`are potatoes and lettuce, the first because they are
`vegetables consumed in the largest quantity mainly
`(Table 3), the latter due to its high nitrate content.32
`The SCF31,32 recommended continuation of efforts to
`reduce exposure to nitrate via food and water since
`nitrate can be converted into nitrite and nitrosamines,
`and urged that good agricultural practices are adopted
`to ensure nitrate levels are as low as reasonably
`achievable.
`In previous research, nitrate intake from vegetables
`was estimated using the data on average daily per
`capita consumption of vegetables provided by the
`Italian National Institute of Nutrition49 and on average
`nitrate content from the research work: nitrate daily
`−1; over 300 mg g−1
`intake from vegetables was 71 mg d
`of nitrate intake was derived from the consumption of
`lettuce and Swiss chard.50
`Dietary exposures to nitrate for vegetarians are very
`similar to those of other consumers and are below the
`ADI. The average dietary exposure of the vegetarians
`−1 and the highest nitrate
`in a UK study was 83 mg d
`−1.51,52
`exposure was 209 mg d
`
`NITRATE CONTENT IN VEGETABLES
`There are several
`factors affecting NO3 uptake
`and accumulation in vegetable tissues, e.g. genetic
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Table 3. Food consumption and nitrate daily intake in some countries of European Union (after Schuddeboom48)
`
`Nitrate in vegetables
`
`Food group
`
`Potato
`
`Other vegetables
`
`Fruit
`
`Country
`
`Germany
`Denmark
`The Netherlands
`UK
`Germany
`Denmark
`The Netherlands
`UK
`Germany
`Denmark
`The Netherlands
`UK
`
`Food
`consumption
`(g person−1)
`112
`166
`131
`160
`73
`114
`150
`162
`101
`120
`125
`91
`
`Average
`concentration
`−1 fm)
`(mg kg
`93
`80
`60
`120
`721
`440
`800
`136
`70
`30
`20
`25
`
`−1 fm)
`Table 4. Classification of vegetables according to NO3 content (mg kg
`
`Low
`(200–500)
`
`Broccoli
`Carrot
`Cauliflower
`Cucumber
`Pumpkin
`‘Puntarelle’ chicory
`
`Middle
`(500–1000)
`
`Cabbage
`‘Cima di rapa’ (broccoli rab)
`Dill
`‘Radicchio’
`Savoy cabbage
`Turnip
`
`Very low
`(<200)
`
`Artichoke
`Asparagus
`Broad bean
`Brussels sprouts Eggplant
`Garlic
`Onion
`Green bean
`Melon
`Mushroom
`Pea
`Pepper
`Potato
`Summer squash
`Sweet potato
`Tomato
`Watermelon
`
`NO3 intake
`(mg person−1)
`10.5
`13.3
`7.9
`19.0
`52.6
`50.2
`120.0
`22.0
`7.1
`3.6
`2.5
`2.3
`
`High
`(1000–2500)
`
`Celeriac
`Chinese cabbage
`Endive
`Escarola
`Fennel
`Kohlrabi
`Leaf chicory
`Leek
`Parsley
`
`Contribution
`to nitrate intake
`(µg mg−1)
`113
`185
`66
`339
`564
`697
`857
`393
`76
`50
`18
`41
`
`Very high
`(>2500)
`
`Celery
`Chervil
`Cress
`Lamb’s lettuce
`Lettuce
`Radish
`Red beetroot
`Rocket
`Spinach
`Swiss chard
`
`factors, environmental factors (atmospheric humidity,
`substrate water content,
`temperature,
`irradiance,
`photoperiod) and agricultural factors (nitrogen doses
`and chemical forms, availability of other nutrients, use
`of herbicides, etc.).53 – 55
`Of the factors studied, nitrogen fertilization and light
`intensity have been identified as the major factors that
`influence nitrate content in vegetables.56 In particular,
`light intensity and nitrate content in soil before or at
`harvest are known to be critical factors in determining
`nitrate levels in spinach53 or other leafy vegetables.55,57
`Generally, nitrate-accumulating vegetables belong
`to the families of Brassicaceae (rocket,
`radish,
`mustard), Chenopodiaceae (beetroot, Swiss chard,
`spinach) and Amarantaceae; but also Asteraceae
`(lettuce) and Apiaceae (celery, parsley) include species
`with high nitrate contents (Table 4).
`Nitrate content can vary also within species,
`cultivars and even genotypes with different ploidy.58
`The differing capacities to accumulate nitrate can
`be correlated with differing location of the nitrate
`reductase activity,59 – 61 as well as to differing degree of
`nitrate absorption and transfer in the plant.53,62
`
`Nitrate content differs in the various parts of a
`plant.50 Indeed, the vegetable organs can be listed by
`decreasing nitrate content as follows: petiole > leaf >
`stem > root > inflorescence > tuber > bulb > fruit >
`seed.50,63
`The highest nitrate-accumulating vegetable is
`rocket,50 a leafy vegetable popular in the Mediter-
`ranean region.55,64,65 A number of species of the
`Brassicaceae family are grouped under the name of
`rocket belonging to the Eruca Miller and Diplotaxis
`DC. genera. Eruca is present in both wild and cul-
`tivated forms; Diplotaxis is known as a wild type. In
`Diplotaxis, two surveys carried out in Italy show NO3
`−1.50,66content reaches up to 9300 mg kg
`
`Rocket absorbs NO3 very quickly64,65 and NO3
`concentration in leaves can be much higher than in
`−1 NO3 nitrogen
`the growth medium. With 1 mmol L
`in a hydroponic nutrient solution, NO3 accumulation
`ratio (expressed as the ratio between the concentration
`in leaves and in nutrient solution) was, respectively,
`55 for E. vesicaria and 101 for D. tenuifolia.67
`Soil-less systems offer a clear advantage to tradi-
`tional ones in the management and control of plant
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`
`13
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`P Santamaria
`
`mineral uptake during the various phases of the grow-
`ing cycle. One advantage of these growing systems is
`that they can be used to produce vegetables with low
`nitrate accumulation.55,65,68
`
`trend for reduction. So, ‘some Member States need
`to maintain the established transitional period to
`authorise the placing on the home market of lettuce
`and/or spinach grown and intended for consumption
`in their territory’.72 This derogation requires annual
`monitoring to be carried out to demonstrate that
`LIMITS TO MAXIMUM LEVELS OF NITRATE IN
`nitrate levels in these crops are acceptable on public
`health grounds and that growers follow a ‘code of good
`VEGETABLES
`agricultural practice’.72
`To protect public health in response to the SCF’s
`The UK is currently applying this derogation for
`considerations of nitrate in food,30 – 32 in 1997 the
`both lettuce and spinach along with Ireland. A
`European Member States agreed an EC Regulation
`derogation for spinach presently applies in Finland,
`setting limits for nitrate in lettuce and spinach (EC
`Denmark and the Netherlands. However, maximum
`Regulation No. 194/97).69 The main purpose of this
`limits do apply to lettuce and spinach imported from
`EC Regulation was to harmonize limits for nitrate in
`Member States and third countries. The derogation
`these vegetables, as the different national limits set by
`for lettuce ended on 1 January 2005. An extension of
`some Member States were causing trade difficulties
`this derogation is currently under consideration within
`across the European Union.
`the EU. The derogation for spinach is currently being
`On 2 April 2002 the European Commission
`reviewed.72
`amended EC Regulation No. 194/97 (already
`Nevertheless, no official method has been published
`amended with some periphrasis from EC Regulation
`No. 864/199970 and 466/200171) and adopted EC
`in EU legislation and nitrate levels in vegetables are
`Regulation No. 563/2002.72 The maximum levels set
`generally assayed by modifying the protocols used for
`other foods.
`by this Regulation are summarized in Table 5. The
`Limits to maximum levels of nitrate for trade in
`limits vary according to season, with higher nitrate
`other vegetables are set in some European countries
`levels permitted in crops grown in winter compared
`(Table 6). For potato, several countries have put
`with those grown in the summer. Lower limits are fixed
`forward the proposal of ‘guidelines’ for nitrate content
`for open-grown lettuce than for lettuce grown under
`(in Germany, for instance, only tubers with less than
`glass, and in order to allow effective control the limits
`−1 fresh matter (fm) are accepted), while
`200 mg kg
`set for open-grown lettuce should apply also to lettuce
`−1
`in Poland there is a maximum limit of 183 mg kg
`grown under glass in the absence of precise labelling.
`fm.73
`Lower limits are fixed for ‘iceberg’ than other types of
`Rocket and other Italian export vegetable (e.g.
`lettuce.
`potato) sales contracts include very strict clauses,
`The differences between nitrate levels in different
`for instance with Switzerland and Germany. Namely,
`varieties have been most extensively studied in
`nitrate content for rocket is required not to exceed
`relation to lettuce where open leaf varieties generally
`−1 fm, which is a very strict threshold
`2.5–4.0 g kg
`have higher nitrate concentrations than tight-headed
`varieties such as iceberg.32
`that is difficult to respect on account of the high
`accumulation of nitrate in rocket, even when reduced
`EC Regulation No. 563/2002 states that ‘in some
`amounts of nitrate are used in its cultivation.74
`regions nitrate levels are reported to be frequently
`No nitrate standards for vegetables have been
`higher than those set in the Annex of Regulation
`introduced in the USA.
`In China, a suggested
`(EC) No 466/2001, although the general trend shows
`−1
`that the levels of nitrate in lettuce are decreasing’.72
`maximum level of nitrate in vegetables of 3100 mg kg
`has been established.75
`The levels of nitrate in spinach show no clear
`−1 fm) in lettuce and spinach according to European Commission Regulation (EC) No.Table 5. Maximum levels (limits) for the nitrate (mg kg
`
`
`563/200272
`
`Product
`
`Fresh spinacha (Spinacia oleracea L.)
`
`Preserved, deep-frozen or frozen spinach
`Fresh lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (protected and
`open-grown lettuce) excluding ‘iceberg’ type
`
`‘Iceberg’ type lettuces
`
`Harvest period
`
`Harvested 1 November to 31 March
`Harvested 1 April to 31 October
`
`Harvested 1 October to 31 March:
`—lettuce grown under cover
`—grown in the open air
`Harvested 1 April to 30 September:
`—lettuce grown under cover
`—lettuce grown in the open air
`Lettuce grown under cover
`Lettuce grown in the open air
`
`NO3
`
`3000
`2500
`2000
`
`4500
`4000
`3500
`2500
`
`2500
`2000
`
`a The maximum levels for fresh spinach do not apply for fresh spinach subject to processing and which is directly transported in bulk from field to
`processing plant.
`
`14
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`−1 fm) to trade various vegetables in some European countries (after Santamaria33)
`Table 6. Maximum levels (limits) of NO3 (mg kg
`
`Nitrate in vegetables
`
`Vegetable
`
`Carrot
`Red beetroot
`Endive (summer)
`Indivia (winter)
`Cabbage
`Radish
`Celery (green)
`Celery (white)
`Lamb’s lettuce
`
`Austria
`
`Belgium
`
`Germany
`
`Netherlands
`
`Switzerland
`
`1500
`4500
`2500
`3500
`1500
`
`2000
`2000
`
`5000
`4000
`3500
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`3500
`2500
`3500
`
`3500
`2500
`2500
`
`3500
`
`the European Commission
`On 7 April 2004,
`established the maximum permitted level for nitrate
`in baby foods and processed cereal-based foods for
`−1 on an ‘as
`infants and young children of 200 mg kg
`sold’ basis.76
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Although current epidemiological data provide con-
`flicting evidence regarding the potential
`long-term
`health risks of nitrate levels encountered in the diet,
`it is widely accepted that the reduction of dietary
`nitrate is a desirable preventive measure. The max-
`imum allowable nitrate levels in vegetables should
`not exceed levels that reflect good agricultural prac-
`tices.
`A reduction in nitrate content can, however,
`represent added value for vegetable products (already
`rich in carotenoids, vitamins C and E, selenium,
`dietary fibre, plant sterols, glucosinolates and indoles,
`isothiocyanates, flavonoids, phenols, etc.).
`
`REFERENCES
`1 Walker R, Nitrates, nitrites and N-nitrosocompounds: a review
`of the occurrence in food and diet and the toxicological
`implications. Food Addit Contam 7:717–768 (1990).
`2 Gangolli SD, van den Brandt P, Feron V, Janzowsky C, Koe-
`man J, Speijers G, Speigelhalder B, Walker R and Winsh-
`nok J, Assessment of nitrate, nitrite, and N-nitroso com-
`pounds. Eur J Pharmacol Environ Toxicol Pharmacol Sect
`292:1–38 (1994).
`3 Speijers GJA, Nitrate, in Toxicological evaluation of certain food
`additives and contaminants
`in food, ed by World Health
`Organization, Food Additives Series 35, Geneva, pp 325–360
`(1996).
`4 Speijers GJA and van den Brandt PA, Nitrate (and poten-
`tial endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds). [Online].
`WHO Food Additives Series 50 (2003). Available:
`http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v50je06.
`htm [21 July 2004].
`5 Mensinga TT, Speijers GJA and Meulenbelt J, Health implica-
`tions of exposure to environmental nitrogenous compounds.
`Toxicol Rev 22:41–51 (2003).
`6 Spiegelhalder B, Eisenbrand G and Preussmann R, Influence of
`dietary nitrate on nitrite content of human saliva: possible
`relevance to in vivo formation of N-nitroso compounds. Food
`Cosmet Toxicol 14:545–548 (1976).
`7 Pannala AS, Mani AR, Spencer JPE, Skinner V, Bruckdor-
`fer KR, Moore KP and Rice-Evans CA, The effect of dietary
`nitrate on salivary, plasma, and urinary nitrate metabolism in
`humans. Free Rad Biol Med 34:576–584 (2003).
`
`8 Speijers GJA, Nitrite (and potential endogenous formation of
`N-nitroso compounds), in Toxicological evaluation of certain
`food additives and contaminants in food, ed by World Health
`Organization, Food Additives Series 35, Geneva, pp 269–323
`(1996).
`9 Speijers GJA and van den Brandt PA, Nitrite (and poten-
`tial endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds). [Online].
`WHO Food Additives Series 50 (2003). Available:
`http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v50je05.
`htm [21 July 2004].
`10 Lijinsky W, N-Nitroso compounds in the diet. Mutat Res
`443:129–138 (1999).
`11 Knobeloch L, Salna B, Hogan A, Postle J and Anderson H, Blue
`babies and nitrate-contaminated well water. Environ Health
`Perspect 108:675–678 (2000).
`12 McKnight GM, Duncan CW, Leifert C and Golden MH,
`Dietary nitrate in man: friend or foe? Br J Nutr 81:349–358
`(1999).
`13 Vittozzi L, Toxicology of nitrates and nitrites. Food Addit Contam
`9:579–585 (1992).
`14 Magee PN and Barnes JM, Some toxic properties of dimethyl-
`nitrosamine. Br J Ind Med 11:167–174 (1954).
`15 Hill MJ, Nitrate toxicity: myth or reality? Br J Nutr 81:343–344
`(1999).
`16 Beresford SA, Is nitrate in drinking water associated with gastric
`cancer in the urban UK? Int J Epidemiol 14:57–63 (1985).
`17 Forman D, Al-Dabbagh A and Doll EC, Nitrate, nitrite and
`gastric cancer in Great Britain. Nature 313:620–625 (1985).
`18 Steinmetz KA and Potter JD, Vegetables, fruit and cancer. I.
`Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 2:325–357 (1991).
`19 Chow CK and Hong CB, Dietary vitamin E and selenium and
`toxicity of nitrite and nitrate. Toxicology 180:195–207 (2002).
`20 Vermeer ITM, Pachen DMFA, Dallinga JW, Kleinjans JCS and
`van Maanen JMS, Volatile N-nitrosamine formation after
`intake of nitrate at the ADI level in combination with an
`amine-rich diet. Environ Health Perspect 106:459–463 (1998).
`21 Van Maanen JMS, van Dijk A, Mulder K, de Baets MH,
`Menheere PCA, van der Heide D, Mertens PLJM and
`Kleinjans JCS, Consumption of drinking water with high
`nitrate levels causes hypertrophy of the thyroid. Toxicol Lett
`72:365–374 (1994).
`22 Parslow RC, McKinney PA, Law GR, Staines A, Williams R
`and Bodansky HJ, Incidence of childhood diabetes mellitus
`in Yorkshire, Northern England, is associated with nitrate
`in drinking water: an ecological analysis. Diabetologia
`40:550–556 (1997).
`23 McKinney PA, Paslow R and Bodansky HJ, Nitrate exposure
`and childhood diabetes, in Managing the risks of nitrates to
`humans and the environment, ed by Wilson WS, Ball AS and
`Hinton RH, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK,
`pp 327–339 (1999).
`24 Addiscott T and Benjamin N, 2000. Are you taking your nitrate?
`Food Sci Techn Today 14:59–61 (2000).
`25 Duncan C, Dougall H,
`Johnston P, Greens S, Brogan R,
`Leifert C, Smith L, Golden M and Benjamin N, Chemical
`
`J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006)
`
`15
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`P Santamaria
`
`generation of nitric oxide in the mouth from the enterosali-
`vary circulation of the dietary nitrate. Nature Med 1:546–551
`(1995).
`26 Dykhuizin RS, Frazer R, Duncan C, Smith CC, Golden M,
`Benjamin N and Leifert C, Antimicrobial effect of acidified
`nitrate on gut pathogens: importance of dietary nitrate in host
`defence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:1422–1425 (1996).
`27 L’hirondel J and L’hirondel J-L, Nitrate and man: toxic, harmless
`or beneficial? CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 168 (2002).
`28 Boink A and Speijers GJA, Health effects of nitrates and nitrites,
`a review. Acta Hortic 563:29–36 (2001).
`29 Auerswald H, Peters P, Br ¨uckner B, Krumbein A and Kuchen-
`buch R, Sensory analysis and instrumental measurements of
`short-term stored tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.).
`Postharvest Biol Techn 15:323–334 (1999).
`30 SCF (Scientific Committee on Food), Opinion on nitrate and
`nitrite, expressed on 19 October 1990 (26th series), ed by
`European Commission, Brussels, pp 23–32 (1992).
`31 SCF (Scientific Committee on Food), Opinion on nitrate and
`nitrite, expressed on 22 September 1995 (Annex 4 to Document
`III/5611/95), ed by European Commission, Brussels, p 20
`(1995).
`32 SCF (Scientific Committee on Food), Assessment of dietary
`intake of nitrates by the population in the European Union,
`as a consequence of the consumption of vegetables, in Reports
`on tasks for scientific cooperation: report of experts participating
`in Task 3.2.3, ed by European Commission, Brussels, p 34
`(1997).
`33 Santamaria P, Contributo degli ortaggi all’assunzione gior-
`naliera di nitrato, nitrito e nitrosammine. Industrie Alimentari
`36:1329–1334 (1997).
`34 Hambridge T, Nitrate and nitrite: intake assessment. [Online].
`WHO Food Additives Series 50 (2003). Available:
`http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v50je07.
`htm [21 July 2004].
`35 Dejonckheere W, Steurbaut W, Drieghe S, Verstraeten R and
`Braeckman H, Nitrate in food commodities of vegetable origin
`and the total diet in Belgium (1992–1993). Microbyol Aliment
`Nutr 12:359–370 (1994).
`36 Dich J, J¨arvinen R, Knekt P and Penttil¨a PL, Dietary intakes of
`nitrate, nitrite and NDMA in the Finnish mobile clinic health
`examination survey. Food Addit Contam 13:541–552 (1996).
`37 Corn´ee J, Lairon D, Velema J, Guyader M and Berthezene P,
`An estimate of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitrosodimethylamine
`concentrations in French food products or food groups. Sci
`Aliments 12:155–197 (1992).
`in der
`38 Selenka F and Brand-Grimm D, Nitrat und nitrit
`Ern¨ahrung des Meuschen. Kalkulation der mittleren
`Tagesonfuahme und Absch¨atzung der Schawankungsbreite.
`Zentralbl Bakteriol Hyg I Abt Orig B 162:449–466 (1976).
`39 CSS (Consiglio Superiore Sanit`a), Commissione ‘Nitriti, nitrati e
`nitrosamine’. Documento conclusivo, Rome, p 154 (1980).
`40 Borawska M, Markiewica R and Wikowska A, Nitrate and
`nitrite content in daily hospital diets during the winter season:
`comparison of analytical and calculation methods. Eur J Clin
`Nutr 41:489–493 (1998).
`41 ACAPV (Administraci´on de la Communidad Aut´onoma
`del Pa´ıs Vasco), Food chemical surveillance in the Basque
`Country: 1990–1995, Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de
`publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco (1997).
`42 Jagerstad M and Nilsson R, Intake of nitrate and nitrite of some
`Swedish consumers as measured by the duplicate portion
`technique, in Proc Sec Symp Nitrite Meat Prod, Zeist, ed by
`Jagerstad M and Nilsson R, pp 283–287 (1976).
`43 Ellen G, Egmond E, van Loon JW, Sahertian ET and Tolsma K,
`Dietary intakes of some essential trace elements, nitrate, nitrite
`and N-nitrosamines, by Dutch adults: estimated via a 24-
`hour duplicate portion study. Food Addit Contam 7:207–221
`(1990).
`44 Knight TM, Forman D, Al-Dabbagh SA and Doll R, Estima-
`tion of dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite in Great Britain.
`Food Chem Toxicol 25:277–285 (198

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket