throbber

`
`UNITED StaTreS PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and ‘Trademark Office
`Address: COMMTSSIONER, FOR PATENTS
`P.C. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virgnia 22313-1450
`Wwww.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION
`FILINGor
`GRP AR’
`
`NUMBER
`371(¢) DATE
`UNI
`FIL FEE REC'D
`ATTY.DOCKET.NO
`[TOT CLAIMS§IND CLAIMS
`61/559,618
`11/14/2011
`560
`B248 1400.P1
`
`59392
`WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RIGE, LLP
`
`Attn: IP Docketing
`
`P.O. BOX 7037
`ATLANTA, GA 30357-0037
`
`CONFIRMATIONNO. 3269
`
`FILING RECEIPT
`
`IACAA
`
`3479
`
`Date Mailed: 12/12/2011
`
`It will not be examined for patentability and will
`Receipt is acknowledged of this provisional patent application.
`become abandoned notlater than twelve monthsafter its filing date. Any correspondence concerning the application
`mustinclude the following identification information: the U.S. APPLICATION NUMBER, FILING DATE, NAME OF
`APPLICANT, and TITLE OF INVENTION. Fees transmitted by check or draft are subject to collection. Please verify
`the accuracy of the data presented on this receipt. If an error is noted on this Filing Receipt, please submit
`a written request for a Filing Receipt Correction. Please provide a copy of this Filing Receipt with the
`changesnotedthereon. If you received a "Notice to File Missing Parts" for this application, please submit
`any corrections to this Filing Receipt with your reply to the Notice. When the USPTO processesthe reply
`to the Notice, the USPTO will generate another Filing Receipt incorporating the requested corrections
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Leon Neuteboom, Youngsville, NC;
`Sherry R. Whitt, Raleigh, NC;
`John McElver, Durham, NC;
`Jill Stevenson Paulik, Cary, NC;
`Scots L. Mankin, Raleigh, NC;
`Powerof Attorney:
`Lawrence Carroll Il--40940
`
`If Required, Foreign Filing License Granted: 12/07/2011
`The country code and number of your priority application, to be used for filing abroad under the Paris Convention,
`is US 61/559,618
`Projected Publication Date: None, application is not eligible for pre-grant publication
`Non-Publication Request: No
`Early Publication Request: No
`Title
`
`METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ISOLATING, IDENTIFYING AND CHARACTERIZING
`MONOCOTPLASTIDIG AGGASE HERBICIDE TOLERANT MUTATIONS USING A MODEL
`SYSTEM
`
`PROTECTING YOUR INVENTION OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
`
`Since the rights granted by a U.S. patent extend only throughout the territory of the United States and have no
`effect in a foreign country, an inventor who wishes patent protection in another country must apply for a patent
`page 1 of 3
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 001
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 001
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`in a specific country or in regional patent offices. Applicants may wish to consider the filing of an international
`application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). An international (PCT) application generally has the same
`effect as a regular national patent application in each PCT-member country. The PCT process simplifies thefiling
`of patent applications on the same invention in member countries, but does notresult in a grant of "an international
`patent" and doesnot eliminate the need of applicantsto file additional documents and fees in countries where patent
`protection is desired.
`
`Almost every country has its own patent law, and a person desiring a patent in a particular country must make an
`application for patent in that country in accordancewith its particular laws. Since the laws of many countries differ
`in various respects from the patent law of the United States, applicants are advised to seek guidance from specific
`foreign countries to ensure that patent rights are not lost prematurely.
`
`Applicants also are advised that in the case of inventions made in the United States, the Director of the USPTO must
`issue a license before applicants can apply for a patent in a foreign country. Thefiling of a U.S. patent application
`serves as a request for a foreign filing license. The application's filing receipt contains further information and
`guidance asto the status of applicant's license for foreign filing.
`
`Applicants may wish to consult the USPTO booklet, "General Information Concerning Patents” (specifically, the
`section entitled "Treaties and Foreign Patents”) for more information on timeframes and deadlinesfor filing foreign
`patent applications. The guide is available either by contacting the USPTO Contact Center at 800-786-9199, or it
`can be viewed on the USPTO website at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html.
`
`For information on preventing theft of your intellectual property (patents, trademarks and copyrights), you may wish
`to consult the U.S. Government website, http:/Avww.stopfakes.gov. Part of a Department of Commerceinitiative,
`this website includes self-help "toolkits" giving innovators guidance on howto protectintellectual property in specific
`countries such as China, Korea and Mexico. For questions regarding patent enforcement issues, applicants may
`call the U.S. Governmenthotline at 1-866-999-HALT (1-866-999-4158).
`
`LICENSE FOR FOREIGN FILING UNDER
`
`Title 35, United States Code, Section 184
`
`Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, 5.11 & 5.15
`
`GRANTED
`
`The applicant has been granted a license under 35 U.S.C. 184, if the phrase "IF REQUIRED, FOREIGN FILING
`LICENSE GRANTED"followed by a date appears on this form. Such licenses are issuedin all applications where
`the conditions for issuance of a license have been met, regardless of whether or not a license may be required as
`set forth in 37 CFR 5.15. The scope andlimitations of this license are set forth in 37 CFR 5.15(a) unless an earlier
`license has been issued under 37 CFR 5.15(b). The license is subject to revocation upon written notification. The
`date indicated is the effective date of the license, unless an earlier license of similar scope has been granted under
`37 CFR 5.13 or 5.14.
`
`This license is to be retained by the licensee and may be usedat any time onor after the effective date thereof unless
`itis revoked. This license is automatically transferred to any related applications(s)filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d). This
`license is not retroactive.
`
`page 2 of 3
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 002
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 002
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`The grantof a license does not in any way lessen the responsibility of a licensee for the security of the subject matter
`as imposed by any Government contract or the provisions of existing laws relating to espionage and the national
`security or the export of technical data. Licensees should apprise themselves of current regulations especially with
`respect to certain countries, of other agencies, particularly the Office of Defense Trade Controls, Department of
`State (with respect to Arms, Munitions and Implements of War (22 GFR 121-128)); the Bureau of Industry and
`Security, Department of Commerce (15 CFR parts 730-774); the Office of Foreign AssetsControl, Department of
`Treasury (31 CFR Parts 500+) and the Departmentof Energy.
`
`NOT GRANTED
`
`No license under 35 U.S.C. 184 has been granted atthis time, if the phrase "IF REQUIRED, FOREIGN FILING
`LIGENSE GRANTED" DOES NOTappear on this form. Applicant maystill petition for a license under 37 CFR 5.12,
`if a license is desired before the expiration of 6 months from thefiling date of the application. If 6 months has lapsed
`from thefiling date of this application and the licensee has not received any indication of a secrecy order under 35
`U.S.C. 181, the licensee may foreign file the application pursuant to 37 CFR 5.15(b).
`
`
`SelectUSA
`
`The United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world and is an unparalleled location
`for business investment, innovation and commercialization of new technologies. The USAoffers tremendous
`resources and advantagesfor those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation
`works to encourage, facilitate, and accelerate business investment. To learn more about why the USAis the best
`country in the world to develop technolagy, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.gov.
`
`page 3 of 3
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 003
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 003
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/16 (12-08)
`Approved for use through 06/30/2010. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERGE
`Underthe Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no personsare required to respondto a collection ofinformation unlessit displays a valid OMB centrol number.
`PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT COVER SHEET - Page 1 of 2
`This is a requestforfiling a PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT under 37 CFR 1.53(¢).
`Express Mail Label No.
`
`INVENTOR(S)
`Residence
`Given Name(first and middle[if any] )
`Family Name or Surname
`
`(City and either State or Foreign Country)
`
`|Youngsville, North Carolina
`Leon
`Neuteboom
`
`Sherry R.
`Whitt
`Raleigh, North Carolina
`John
`McElver
`[_Durham, North Carolina
`
`
`
`
`
`Paulik
`Jill Stevenson
`Mankin
`Scots L.
`Additional inventors are being named on the
`
`Cary, North Carolina
`| Raleigh, North Carolina
`separately numbered sheets attached hereto.
`
`METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ISOLATING, IDENTIFYING AND CHARACTERIZING MONOCOT
`PLASTIDIC ACCASE HERBICIDE TOLERANT MUTATIONSUSING A MODEL SYSTEM
`
`
`Direct ail correspondenceto:
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`[x] The address corresponding to Customer Number:
`
`55392
`
`Firm or
`Individual Name
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`ENCLOSED APPLICATION PARTS(checkail that apply)
`
`[_ [Application Data Sheet. See 37 CFR1.76
`CD(s), Number of CDs
`
`98
`Drawing(s) Number of Sheets
`Other(specify)
`[x] Specification (e.g. description of the invention) Number ofPages
`78
`Fees Due: Filing Fee of $220 ($110 for small entity).
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100 sheets of paper, an application size fee is also
`due, which is $270 ($135 for small entity)
`for each additional 50 sheets orfraction thereof. See 35 U.S.C. 41(a)(1)(G) and 37 CFR 1.18(s).
`METHOD OF PAYMENTOF THE FILING FEE AND APPLICATION SIZE FEE FOR THIS PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT
`
`|] Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27.
`250.00
`|_| Acheck or moneyorder made payable to the Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office
`is enclosed to coverthefiling fee and application size fee (if applicable).
`AL FEE AM
`FI
`OUNT (s)
`TOTAL
`Payment by credit card. Form PTO-2038is attached.
`The Directoris hereby authorized to chargethefiling fee and application size fee (if applicable} or credit any Overpaymentto Deposit
`Account Number:
`09-0528
`
`x
`
`
`
`
`
`USE ONLY FOR FILING A PROVISIONAL APPLICATION FOR PATENT
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 004
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 004
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`PROVISIONAL APPLICATION COVER SHEET
`Page 2 of 2
`
`PTO/SB/16 (12-08)
`Approved for use through 06/30/2010. OMB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Underthe Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no personsare required to respondto a collection ofinformation unless it displays a valid OMB contro! number.
`
`The inventlon was made by an agencyof the United States Government or undera coniract with an agency of the United States Government.
`[x] No.
`
`
`
` Yes, the narne of the U.S. Government agency and the Government contract numberare:
`
`WARNING:
`is cautioned to avoid submitting personal
`information in documents filed in a patent application that may
`Péetitioner/applicant
`coniribute to identity theft. Personal information such as social security numbers, bank account numbers, or credit card
`numbers (other than a check or credit card authorization form PTO-2038 submitted for payment purposes) is never required by
`the USPTOto support a petition or an application. If this type of personal information is included in documents submitted to
`the USPTO, petitioners/applicants should consider redacting such personal information from the documents before submitting
`them to the USPTO. Petitloner/applicant is advised that the record of a patent application is available to the public after
`publication of the application (unless a non-publication request in compliance with 37 CFR 1.213(a) is made in the application)
`or issuance of a patent. Furthermore, the record from an abandoned application may also be available to the public if the
`application is referenced in a published application or an issued patent (see 37 CFR 1.14). Checks and credit card
`authorization forms PT@-2038 subptitted for payment purposes are not retained in the application file and therefore are not
`
`publicly available.
`
`SIGNATURE
`
`TYPED or PRINTED NAME
`
`Lawrence J. Carroll
`
`Date
`
`November 14, 2011
`
`REGISTRATION NO.
`(if appropriate)
`
`40,940
`
`TELEPHONE
`
`(202) 467-6900
`
`Docket Number:
`
`B248 1400.P1
`
`WCSR 7031096v1
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 005
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 005
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ISOLATING, IDENTIFYING AND
`CHARACTERIZING MONOCOT PLASTIDIC ACCASE HERBICIDE TOLERANT
`MUTATIONS USING A MODEL SYSTEM
`
`1.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`(0001)
`
`The present invention relates compositions and methodsfor identifying and
`
`isolating herbicide tolerant mutations in plant acetyl-CoA carboxylases.
`
`2.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0002]
`
`Aryloxyphenoxypropionate (FOP) and cyclohexanedione (DIM) herbicides are
`
`used post-emergence in dicot crops to control gramineous weeds. Because these herbicides
`
`effectively kill most monocotyledonous species at low concentrations, there is low toxicity to
`
`non-target organisms. Great potential exists for developing cereal varieties that can be
`
`treated post-emergence to control weedy grasses that escape other pre-emergent herbicides
`
`treatments (Somers, 1996). Furthermore, these herbicides have low persistence in soil and
`
`provide growers with increased flexibility for weed control and crop rotation. For example,
`
`red rice is the mast pervasive and expensive pest in U.S. rice production (USDA-ARSDale
`
`Bumpers National Rice Research Center 2006 Annual Report) and canserve as a host for rice
`diseases. CLEARFIELD®Riceis the premiertool for managingred rice in infested areas;
`however, gene flow between red rice and CLEARFIELD® Ricecan result in~170 Fl
`hybrids/ha (Shivrainet al., 2007). Thus, stewardship guidelines limit CLEARFIELD® Rice
`market penetration to two out of any four years on any given field. Therefore, the generation
`of cultivated rice with tolerance to different herbicides will provide farmers CLEARFIELD®
`
`with a rotation partner to help managered rice weed populations.
`
`[0003]
`
`FOPs and DIMstarget the enzyme Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2), which
`
`catalyzes thefirst committed step in fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis. ACCaseis a biotinylated
`
`enzymethat converts acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA in a 2-step reversible reaction. The
`
`enzymefirst carboxylates the biotin group and then theintrinsic carboxytranferase activity
`
`transfers the carboxyl group from carboxybiotin to acetyl-CoA (Nikolau et al., 2003).
`
`ACCaseactivity is necessary in the plastid which is the primary site for FA biosynthesis for
`
`membrane biogenesis. ACCaseactivity is also present in the cytosol, where it is involved in
`
`the synthesis of very long chain FA and flavonoids (Chugh and Eudes, 2008). The
`
`multidomain, cytoplasmic monocot and dicot ACCases are not sensitive to the FOP and DIM
`
`herbicides. It is the plastidic form of ACCase that confers the selectivity to this class of
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 006
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 006
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`herbicides. Dicot plastidic ACCasesare naturally insensitive while monocotplastidic
`ACCases are herbicide-sensitive. The plastidic ACCases are highly expressed in
`
`meristematic tissue to feed the high demand for membrane biogenesis in rapidly growing,
`
`young seedlings (Podkowinskiet al., 2003). This essential role for growth explains the
`
`effectiveness of targeting ACCase inhibition in post-emergent weeds.
`
`[0004]
`
`Since the inception of FOP and DIM usefor controlling weeds in world
`
`agriculture in the 1980s, there has been an emergence of tolerance amid various weed
`
`species. Amongthese, the most extensively studied are Alopecurus myosuroides (blackgrass)
`
`and Avenasterilis (wild oat). Comprehensive studies ofnatural blackgrass and wild oat
`
`mutants have revealed six residues within the carboxyltransferase domainofthe plastidic
`
`isoform that confer tolerance to FOPs and/or DIMs (Delyeet al., 2003; Delye et al., 2005;
`
`Liu et al., 2007) and these are [1781L, W2027C, I2041N, G2096A, D2078G and C2088R
`
`(designation according to standard blackgrass ACCase reference sequence). Interestingly,
`
`11781L and D2078G confer tolerance to both FOPs and DIMswhile the other four mutations
`
`confer tolerance only to FOPs, suggesting that the bindingsites of the two classes of
`
`herbicides is overlapping, yet distinct.
`
`(0005)
`
`Two approaches to develop DIM tolerant rice that have beentried include the
`
`following. In thefirst approach, previously identified mutations in natural blackgrass and
`
`wild oat are introduced by means of molecular biological techniques in rice plastidic
`
`ACCase. Theeffects of the mutationsare studied in rice after Agrobacterium-mediated
`
`transformation of the modified ACCase genes. Ultimately, the same mutations can be
`
`engineeredat the endogenouslocus through oligonucleotide gene targeting (Beetham etal.,
`
`1999).
`
`In the second approachrice callus is propagated in medium with gradually increasing
`
`DIM concentrations. This procedure can enrich the callus for cells in which plastidic
`
`ACCasehas mutated to become moretolerant to the herbicide. Plants can be regenerated
`
`from the callus whenasatisfactory tolerance level has been reached. However, both
`
`approaches are limited in the number of mutations that can be generated and/ortested.
`
`[0006]
`
`Yeast is an excellent model organism for screening andtesting large numbers of
`
`mutated rice ACCase genes for increased herbicide tolerance. However, yeast contains a
`
`single, endogenous ACCase gene (ACC1), which encodes a multidomain protein that is
`
`highly tolerant to herbicides. Haploid yeast in which ACCI is disrupted is not viable
`
`(Hassiacheret al., 1993). Joachimiak et al. (1997) introduced wheat cytoplasmic ACCase
`
`into a diploid strain heterozygous for ACC1. Standard tetrad analysis demonstrated that the
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 007
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 007
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`ACC] mutation was complemented by the plant ACCase. A similar experiment with the
`
`herbicide-sensitive wheat plastidic ACCase gene showedthat this gene was notable to take
`
`over the function of ACC/ (Nikolskayaet al., 1999). A series of chimeric constructs
`
`consisting ofthe N-terminus of wheat cytoplasmic ACCase and the C-terminus of wheat
`
`plastidic ACCase was tested for complementation and herbicide sensitivity. Wheat c60p40
`
`ACCase, which is comprised ofthe first 60% of cytoplasmic ACCase and last 40% of
`
`plastidic ACCase, complemented an ACCase deletion mutant, Aaccl, while showing the
`
`highest sensitivity towards haloxyfop, clodinafop, quizalafop, cethoxydim and sethoxydim of
`
`all constructs tested. The c60p40 chimeric ACCaseis a suitable target for mutagenesis,asall
`
`herbicide-conferring mutations known have been mappedto the last 40% ofplastidic
`
`ACCase. Yet, the Joachimiak approachis limited in its efficiency in that each new mutant
`
`plastid ACCase construct is separately introduced into yeast cells to create a new yeast
`
`knockout complement.
`
`[0007]
`
`DIMsand FOPs are important herbicides and there is a need for methods and
`
`compositions to isolate, identify and characterize herbicide tolerant ACCase variants. The
`
`methods and compositions described herein are suitable for isolating, identifying, and
`
`characterizing such herbicide tolerant ACCase variants. Citation or discussion of a reference
`
`herein shall not be construed as an admission that suchis prior art to the present invention.
`
`3.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0008]
`
`In some embodiments, the present invention provides methods of producing an
`
`acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) enzymethatis tolerant to at least one herbicide.
`
`Typically, the methodsof the invention are high throughput methods. Such methods will
`
`typically comprise, providing an ACCase-deficient yeast that comprises a nucleic acid
`
`encoding a chimeric ACCase. Any nucleic acid molecule known in the art may be used for
`
`this purpose. Suitable examples include, but are not limited to, plasmids, for example single
`
`copy plasmids. The chimeric ACCase encoded by the nucleic acid will comprise two or more
`
`regions. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid will comprise an N-terminal region and a C-
`
`terminal region, wherein the C-terminal region comprises an herbicide sensitivity region
`
`(HSR). The ACCase-deficient yeast comprising the nucleic acid will be contacted with at
`
`least one mutagenic oligonucleotide underconditions that permit site-directed mutagenesis of
`
`at least one codonof the nucleic acid encoding the chimeric ACCase. The mutagenized yeast
`
`can then be grown thereby forming a library of mutagenized yeast colonies. The library of
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 008
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 008
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`mutagenized yeast colonies can be cultured in the presence ofat least one ACCase-inhibiting
`herbicide to form treated colonies; and at least one of said treated colonies isolated so as to
`
`identify at least one mutagenized yeast that grows in the presenceof the herbicide, wherein
`the mutagenized yeast that grows in the presence ofthe herbicide comprises a mutagenized
`
`ACCasethat has a toleranceto the herbicide that is greater than that exhibited by the chimeric
`
`ACCaseprior to mutagenesis. As indicated above, typically these methods are high
`
`throughput, for example, in an embodimentof the present method, one trained worked can
`
`generate and screen at least 500 different HSR-variant ACCases, each from its own cell
`
`colony, in 1 month, more preferablyat least or about 1000, 2000, or 4000, and preferably up
`
`to or about 5000, 8000, or 10000 per month; as compared to the Nikolskaya yeast method
`
`(tetrad dissection) in which one worker could accomplish 10 to less than about 50. In some
`
`embodiments invention, the present methods are capable of producingat least about 100, 200,
`
`300, 400, 500, 1,000, 2,500, 5,000, or 10,000 different HSR-variant ACCases per month per
`
`trained worker. Preferably methodsof the invention are capable of producing at least about
`
`500, 1,000, 2,500, 5,000, or 10,000 different HSR-variant ACCases per month pertrained
`
`worker. This assumesthat the trained workerin either case begins with all needed supplies
`
`of competent cells and vectors useful to transform those cells either with mutagenic oligos
`
`according to a present embodiment or with the ACCase variant according to the Nikolskaya
`
`method; and that no cell colonies are split to form multiplicates for assaying, after the clonal
`
`colonies are established.
`
`[8009]
`
`The present invention relates to methods of producing,isolating, identifying and
`
`characterizing herbicide tolerant ACCase variants. In one embodiment, the invention
`
`encompasses a method of screening for an acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) enzyme which
`
`is tolerant to at least one herbicide, comprising: a) providing an ACCase-deficient yeast with
`
`a chimeric ACCase, said chimeric ACCase comprising: at least two regions wherein said
`
`regions further comprise; i) an N-terminal region, said N-terminal region derived from yeast,
`
`fungi or monocot cytoplasmic ACCases, preferably a yeast ACCase;ii) a C-terminal region,
`
`said C-terminal region derived from monocotplastidic ACCases and comprising an HSR; and
`
`iti) said N-terminal region comprises about 50% to about 60% of the chimeric ACCase;b)
`
`isolating herbicide tolerant yeast cells after culturing in the presenceof at least one herbicide;
`
`and c) further comprising identifying the mutation(s) not present in chimeric ACCaseprior to
`
`culturing, which confers tolerance to at least one herbicide.
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 009
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 009
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`In other embodiments, the present invention relates to a yeast cell tolerantto at
`[0010]
`least one herbicide whercin the cell is produced by: a) complementing an ACCase-deficient
`yeast with a chimeric ACCase, said chimeric ACCase comprisingat least two regions
`wherein said regions further comprise; i) an N-terminal region, said N-terminal region
`derived from yeast, fungi or monocot ACCases;ii) a C-terminal region, said C-terminal
`region derived from one or more monocot-species plastidic ACCases and comprising an
`HSR;andiii) said N-terminal region comprises about 50% to about 60% of the chimeric
`ACCase; and b)isolating herbicide tolerant yeast cells after culturing in the presenceofat
`
`least one herbicide.
`
`In yet other embodiments, the present invention relates to an isolated yeast cell
`[0011]
`comprising: a) no active genomic ACCase;b) a nucleic acid encoding a chimeric ACCase,
`said chimeric ACCase comprising at least two regions wherein said regions further comprise;
`i) an N-terminal region, said N-terminal region derived from yeast, fungi or monocot
`ACCases; ii) a C-terminal region, said C-terminal region derived from monocot-species
`plastidic ACCase and comprising an HSR;andiii) said N-terminal region comprises about
`50% to about 60% of the chimeric ACCase; and c) at least one oligonucleotide thatis
`
`mutagenic for the non-yeast ACCase.
`
`[0012]
`
`In yet other embodiments, the present invention relates to a mutant ACCase which
`
`is tolerant to at least on herbicide wherein the ACCaseis identified by: a) providing an
`
`ACCase-deficient yeast with a chimeric ACCase, said chimeric ACCase comprisingat least
`
`two regions wherein said regions comprise; i) an N-terminal region, said N-terminal region
`
`derived from yeast, fungi or monocot ACCases; il) a C-terminalregion, said C-terminal
`region derived from monocot-speciesplastidic ACCases and comprising an HSR;andiii)
`said N-terminal region comprises about 50% to about 60% ofthe chimeric ACCase;b)
`isolating herbicide tolerant yeast cells after culturing in the presenceofat least one herbicide;
`
`c)further comprising identifying the mutation(s) not present in chimeric ACCase priorto
`culturing, which confers tolerance to at least one herbicide; and d) recapitulating said
`mutation in a full-length monocotplastidic ACCase gene.
`
`[0013]
`
`In yet other embodiments, the present invention relates to an isolated DNA
`
`molecule encoding a chimeric ACCase whichis tolerant to at least one herbicide, said
`
`chimeric ACCase comprising at least two regions wherein said regions comprise; a) an N-
`
`terminal region, said N-terminal region derived from yeast, fungi or monocot cytoplasmic
`ACCases; b) a C-terminal region, said C-terminalregion derived from monocotplastidic
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 010
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 010
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`ACCases and comprising an HSR, wherein said C-terminal region further comprisesat least
`
`one mutation that confers tolerance to the herbicide ; and c) said N-terminal region comprises
`
`about 50% to about 60% of the chimeric ACCase.
`
`[0014]
`
`In yet other embodiments, the present invention relates to an isolated chimeric
`
`ACCase whichis tolerantto at least one herbicide, said chimeric ACCase comprising at least
`two regions wherein said regions comprise: a) an N-terminal region, said N-terminal region
`derived from yeast, fungi or monocot cytoplasmic ACCases; b) a C-terminal region, said C-
`
`terminal region derived from monocotplastidic ACCases and comprising an HSR; and c)
`
`said N-terminal region comprises about 50% to about 60% of the chimeric ACCase.
`
`[0015]
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass
`
`ACCase-deficient yeast due to a mutation of the genomic yeast ACCase gene which include a
`
`single point mutation, multiple point mutations, a partial deletion, a partial knockout, a
`
`complete deletion and a complete knockout.
`
`[0016]
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass an
`
`chimeric or mutant ACCase, wherein said N-terminal regionis derived from a yeast or fungi
`
`genus selected from the group consisting of Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Candida,
`
`Ascomycetes Neurospora, Kluyveromyces, Picha, Cryptococcus, Chrysosporium, Yarrowia,
`
`Arxula, and Hansenula.
`
`[0017]
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass a
`
`chimeric or mutant ACCase, wherein said N-terminal region or C-terminal region is derived
`
`from a monocot genus selected from the group consisting of Saccharum, Poa, Agrostis,
`
`Lolium, Festuca, Zoysia, Cynodon, Stenotaphrum, Paspalum, Eremochloa, Axonopus,
`Bouteloua, Arundinaria, Bambusa, Chusquea, Guadua, Shibataea, Erharta, Leersia,
`Microlaena, Oryza, Zizania, Triticeae, Aveneae, Hordeum, Lolium, Digitaria, Cyperus,
`
`Kyllinga, Erigeron, Hydrocotyle, Kummerowia, Euphorbia, and Viola, Zea, Sorghum,
`
`Pennisetum, Panicum, Setaria, Eleusine, Ananas, and Musa.
`
`[0018]
`
`Ina specific embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass
`
`a chimeric ACCase, wherein said N-terminal region is derived from a cytoplasmic ACCase
`
`from an Oryza species.
`
`[6019]
`
`In yet other specific embodiments, in other embodiments, methods and
`
`compositions of the invention encompass a chimeric ACCase, wherein said C-terminal region
`
`is derived from a plastidic ACCase from an Oryza species.
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 011
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 011
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty. Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`[0020]
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass at
`
`least one herbicide that is a aryloxyphenoxyproprionate (FOP) or cyclohexadione (DIM)
`
`herbicide. In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass a
`
`FOP herbicide selected from the group consisting of haloxyfop, cyhalofop, quizalofop,
`
`diclofop, clodinafop, fluazifop, metamifop, propaquizafop, and fenoxyprop. In other
`
`embodiments, methods and compositionsof the invention encompass a DIM herbicide
`
`selected from the group consisting of alloxydim, butroxydim, clethodim, cycloxydim,
`
`tepraloxydim, sethoxydim, tralkoxydim, and profoxydim. In yet further embodiments,
`
`methods and compositions of the invention encompass at least one herbicide present at a
`
`concentration from about 0.02 uM to about 200 uM.
`
`(0021)
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass
`
`mutagenesis of the chimeric ACCase. In further embodiments, methods and compositions of
`
`the invention éncompass mutagenesis induced by chemical agents, ultraviolet radiation, or a
`
`library of DNA oligos provided to the yeastcell.
`
`{0022}
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass a
`
`chimeric ACCase were C-terminal region comprises about 50% to about 60% of the chimeric
`
`ACCase.
`
`[0023]
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions of the invention encompass
`
`yeast celis cultured at a temperature of about 23°C to about 30°C. In other embodiments,
`
`methods and compositions of the invention encompass yeastcells are cultured in liquid or on
`
`solid media.
`
`(0024)
`
`In other embodiments, methods and compositions ofthe invention encompass a
`
`chimeric or mutant ACCase wherein said C-terminal region comprises a sequence which
`
`encodes for at least one mutation selected from the group consisting of 11781L, W1999G,
`
`11781T, V2049F, V2075L, V2075I, D2078G, and V2098A.
`
`4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
`
`[6025]
`
`Forthe purpose of illustrating the invention, there are depicted in the drawings
`
`certain embodiments onthe invention. However, the invention is not limited to the precise
`
`arrangements and instrumentalities of the embodiments depicted in the drawings.
`
`[0026]
`
`Figure 1A provides a schematic view of the domain structure of a monocot
`
`plastidic ACCase.
`
`PGR2021-00114 Ex. 1011
`RiceTec,Inc.
`Page 012
`
`Ex. 1011
`RiceTec, Inc.
`Page 012
`
`PGR2021-00114
`
`

`

`Atty, Dkt. No. B248 1400.P1
`
`[0027]
`
`Figure 1B provides an overview of the OsJACCc60p40 chimeric protein. Unique
`
`restriction sites introduced in the corresponding DNA sequence for subcloning are indicated.
`
`Amino acids for which substitutions have been found to confer herbicide tolerance are
`
`indicated by white rectangles.
`
`[0028
`
`Figure 2A provides an overview of plasmid RTP3240-1; Figure 2B provides an
`
`overview of plasmid RTP4108; and Figure 2C provides the DNA sequence of RTP4108
`
`(SEQ ID NO:13).
`
`[0029]
`
`Figure 3A provides an overview of plasmid RTP3378; and Figure 3B provides the
`
`DNA

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket