throbber
(cid:56)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:31)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:92)(cid:19)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:19)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:89)(cid:20)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:25)(cid:30)(cid:21)(cid:26)
`
`(cid:62)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:47)(cid:88)(cid:16)(cid:39)(cid:50)(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:50)(cid:55)(cid:92)(cid:85)(cid:22)(cid:64)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:62)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:16)(cid:39)(cid:55)(cid:51)(cid:36)(cid:82)(cid:64)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)
`(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:87)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:42)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:47)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:51)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:123)(cid:5)(cid:52)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:84)(cid:71)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:90)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:31)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:50)(cid:74)(cid:73)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)
`(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:26)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:17)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:90)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:50)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:5)(cid:48)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:79)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:71)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:76)
`(cid:42)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:40)
`
`(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:23)(cid:17)(cid:29)(cid:25)(cid:24)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:47)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:5)(cid:42)(cid:87)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)
`(cid:38)(cid:73)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:38)
`
`(cid:28)(cid:22)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:24)(cid:17)(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:90)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:84)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:31)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:84)(cid:5)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:82)(cid:78)(cid:95)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:78)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:13)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:57)(cid:14)(cid:5)(cid:59)(cid:78)(cid:74)(cid:92)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:42)(cid:38)(cid:41)(cid:56)
`(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:21)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:83)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:87)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:83)
`(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:19)(cid:84)(cid:87)(cid:76)
`
`(cid:28)(cid:30)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:24)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:29)(cid:29)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:50)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:56)(cid:72)(cid:77)(cid:82)(cid:78)(cid:73)(cid:89)
`(cid:50)(cid:70)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:87)(cid:84)(cid:73)(cid:89)
`
`(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:39)(cid:49)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:23)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:57)(cid:38)(cid:57)(cid:46)(cid:52)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:100)(cid:100)(cid:100)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:5)(cid:53)(cid:55)(cid:52)(cid:43)(cid:46)(cid:49)(cid:42)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:84)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:78)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:92)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:85)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:71)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:50)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:5)(cid:48)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:78)(cid:79)(cid:83)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:71)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:83)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:5)(cid:47)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:94)(cid:5)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:28)(cid:19)
`
`(cid:57)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:90)(cid:88)(cid:74)(cid:87)(cid:5)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:5)(cid:87)(cid:74)(cid:86)(cid:90)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:89)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:77)(cid:70)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:83)(cid:89)(cid:5)(cid:84)(cid:75)(cid:5)(cid:89)(cid:77)(cid:74)(cid:5)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:92)(cid:83)(cid:81)(cid:84)(cid:70)(cid:73)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:5)(cid:75)(cid:78)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:19)
`
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`Original article
`
`[177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate:
`comparison with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide in patients
`Dik J. Kwekkeboom1, Willem H. Bakker1, Peter P. M. Kooij1, Mark W. Konijnenberg3, Ananth Srinivasan4,
`Jack L. Erion4, Michelle A. Schmidt4, Joe L. Bugaj4, Marion de Jong1, Eric P. Krenning1, 2
`1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
`2 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands
`3 Mallinckrodt Medical, Petten, the Netherlands
`4 Mallinckrodt Medical, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
`
`Received 26 February and in revised form 24 April 2001 / Published online: 4 July 2001
`© Springer-Verlag 2001
`
`Abstract. The somatostatin analogue [DOTA0,Tyr3]oct-
`reotate has a nine-fold higher affinity for the somatosta-
`tin receptor subtype 2 as compared with [DOTA0,
`Tyr3]octreotide. Also, labelled with the beta- and gam-
`ma-emitting radionuclide lutetium-177, this compound
`has been shown to have a very favourable impact on tu-
`mour regression and animal survival in a rat model. Be-
`cause of these reported advantages over the analogues
`currently used for somatostatin receptor-mediated radio-
`therapy, we decided to compare [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]oct-
`reotate (177Lu-octreotate) with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide
`(111In-octreotide) in six patients with somatostatin recep-
`tor-positive tumours. Plasma radioactivity after 177Lu-
`octreotate expressed as a percentage of the injected dose
`was comparable with that after 111In-octreotide. Urinary
`excretion of radioactivity was significantly lower than
`after 111In-octreotide, averaging 64% after 24 h. The up-
`take after 24 h, expressed as a percentage of the injected
`dose of 177Lu-octreotate, was comparable to that after
`111In-octreotide for kidneys, spleen and liver, but was
`three- to fourfold higher for four of five tumours. The
`spleen and kidneys received the highest absorbed doses.
`The doses to the kidneys were reduced by a mean of
`47% after co-infusion of amino acids. It is concluded
`that in comparison with the radionuclide-coupled so-
`matostatin analogues that are currently available for so-
`matostatin receptor-mediated radiotherapy, 177Lu-octreo-
`tate potentially represents an important improvement.
`Higher absorbed doses can be achieved to most tumours,
`with about equal doses to potentially dose-limiting or-
`gans; furthermore, the lower tissue penetration range of
`177Lu as compared with 90Y may be especially important
`for small tumours.
`Dik J. Kwekkeboom (✉)
`Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Rotterdam,
`Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`e-mail: djkwekkeboom@hotmail.com
`Tel.: +31-10-4635963, Fax: +31-10-4635997
`
`Keywords: Somatostatin – Somatostatin receptor imag-
`ing – Octreotate – Peptide receptor radiotherapy
`
`Eur J Nucl Med (2001) 28:1319–1325
`DOI 10.1007/s002590100574
`
`Introduction
`
`Somatostatin receptor imaging with [111In-DTPA0]oct-
`reotide (Octreoscan) is nowadays recognised to be an
`important, if not the primary imaging technique for the
`localisation and staging of neuroendocrine tumours.
`In patients with progressive, metastasised neuroendo-
`crine tumours, radionuclide therapy with high doses of
`[111In-DTPA0]octreotide is performed with encouraging
`results [1, 2, 3, 4]. However, 111In-coupled peptides are
`not ideal for peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) be-
`cause of the small particle range and the resultant short
`tissue penetration. Therefore, another radiolabelled so-
`matostatin analogue, [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide, was
`developed. A preliminary study by Otte et al. [5] showed
`favourable results of [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide treat-
`ment in five patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Also,
`a recent analysis of the results of this treatment in a
`multicentre trial in 22 end-stage patients with progres-
`sive disease showed a partial tumour response in two, a
`minor response in three and stable disease in ten [6].
`Paganelli et al. [7] have also reported favourable prelimi-
`nary results regarding tumour growth with this 90Y-
`labelled compound.
`Recently, it was reported that compared with [DTPA0,
`Tyr3]octreotide, [DTPA0,Tyr3]octreotate (in which the C-
`terminal threoninol is replaced with threonine) showed
`improved binding to somatostatin receptor-positive tis-
`sues in animal experiments [8]. Also, its DOTA-coupled
`counterpart, [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate, labelled with the
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`1320
`beta- and gamma-emitting radionuclide lutetium-177,
`was reported to have a very successful impact on tumour
`regression and animal survival in a rat model [9]. Reubi
`et al. [10] reported a ninefold increase in affinity for the
`somatostatin receptor subtype 2 for [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreo-
`tate as compared with [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide, and a
`six- to sevenfold increase in affinity for their yttrium-
`loaded counterparts.
`Because of these reported advantages over both so-
`matostatin analogues currently used for PRRT, we decid-
`ed to study [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in patients with so-
`matostatin receptor-positive tumours. It was complexed
`with 177Lu because this radionuclide, apart from interme-
`diate beta energy, also emits gammas suitable for scintig-
`raphy and subsequent dosimetry.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Patients
`
`[177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (177Lu-octreotate) was administered
`in six patients (four women and two men, aged 15–76 years). In
`five of them, somatostatin receptor imaging with [111In-DTPA0]oct-
`reotide (111In-octreotide), performed during the 3 months preceding
`177Lu-octreotate scintigraphy, was available. None of the patients
`used somatostatin analogues.
`One patient had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), one had
`non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), one had a gastroenteropancreatic
`(GEP) tumour, one had aesthesioneuroblastoma, one had a rem-
`nant of a Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid, and one had papil-
`lary thyroid carcinoma.
`All patients gave written informed consent to participation in
`the study, which was approved by the medical ethical committee
`of the hospital.
`
`Methods
`
`[DOTA0,Tyr3]Octreotate was obtained from Mallinckrodt (St
`Louis, Mo., USA). Kits were prepared consisting of 120 μg
`[DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate, 37.8 mg sodium ascorbate and 7.5 mg
`gentisic acid in 300 μl 0.05 M HCl. Kits were stored at –20°C until
`use. 177LuCl3 was obtained from Missouri University Research
`Reactor (MURR; University of Missouri, Mo., USA). 177LuCl3
`was diluted in 0.05 M HCl to a concentration of 11.1 GBq/ml, and
`2,220 MBq 177LuCl3 was added to each kit. The mixture was heat-
`ed for 30 min at 80°C. The labeling yield was checked using in-
`stant thin-layer chromatography (ITLC-SG, Gelman, Ann Arbor,
`Mich., USA) with 0.1 M Na citrate, pH 5.0, as solvent. The la-
`belled peptide migrated from the origin till Rf=0.67, while the free
`radionuclide migrated with the solvent front (Rf=1).
`The radiochemical purity was determined by high-performance
`liquid chromatography (HPLC) according to the following proce-
`dure. Column: Symmetry C18 4.6×250 mm, 5 μm (Waters, Mil-
`ford, Mass., USA). Flow: 1 ml/min. Solvent A: methanol; solvent
`B: 0.06 M sodium acetate pH 5.5. From t=0 to 6.5 min 100% B;
`from t=6.5 to 7.0 min from 100% B to 50% B; from t=7.0 to
`27 min from 50% B to 40% B; from t=27 min to 27.2 min from
`40% B to 100% A; from t=27.2 min to 32 min: 100% A.
`The labeling yield always exceeded 98% and the radiochemi-
`cal purity was higher than 88%. The injected dose was 1,850 MBq
`
`(range 1,847–1,874 MBq); the injected mass of [DOTA0,Tyr3]oct-
`reotate was 90–100 μg.
`111In-octreotide was prepared using the Octreoscan kit from
`Mallinckrodt Medical (Petten, the Netherlands). The injected dose
`was about 220 MBq, coupled to 8–9 μg [DTPA0]octreotide.
`
`Imaging
`
`177Lu-octreotate. The infusion volume was 80 ml and the infusion
`speed was 10 min. The infusion line by which the radiopharma-
`ceutical was administered was thereafter rinsed with about 100 ml
`saline. Dynamic images of the upper abdomen were obtained from
`the time of injection up to 20 min p.i. Planar spot images of the
`upper abdomen and chest in five patients, and of the upper abdo-
`men and the head and neck in the sixth patient, were obtained
`with a dual-head camera (Picker Prism 2000) 4 h and 1, 3, 10 and
`17 days p.i. Counts from both gamma peaks (208 and 113 keV)
`were collected in separate windows (width 20%). The acquisition
`time was 15 min/view. For dosimetry, a standard with a known ali-
`quot of the injected dose was also counted.
`
`111In-octreotide. The windows were centered over both 111In
`photon peaks (245 and 172 keV) with a window width of 20%.
`Fifteen-minute spot images were obtained 24 h p.i.
`
`Co-infusion of amino acids
`
`In five patients the administration of the same amount and dose of
`177Lu-octreotate was repeated 6–9 weeks later. An infusion of ami-
`no acids (lysine 2.5%, arginine 2.5% in 1 l 0.9% NaCl; 250 ml/h)
`was started 30 min before the administration of the radiopharma-
`ceutical and lasted up to 3.5 h afterwards. Via a second pump
`system the radiopharmaceutical was co-administered.
`
`Measurement of radioactivity in blood and urine
`
`Blood samples were drawn 10, 20, 40, 60 and 90 min and 2, 5 and
`24 h after injection. Urine was collected at two 3-h intervals and
`thereafter up to 24 h after injection.
`Radioactivity in blood and urine was measured with a
`COBRA-Packard auto-gamma counting system (Packard, Meri-
`den, Conn., USA).
`The chemical status of the radionuclide in blood and urine was
`analysed as a function of time by HPLC techniques (see above).
`
`In vivo measurements
`
`The uptake in organs and tumours was calculated as described pre-
`viously [11]. Dosimetric calculations were performed using the
`MIRDOSE package, version 3.0.
`
`Statistics
`
`Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t tests were used.
`P values <0.05 were considered significant.
`
`Results
`
`No side-effects or changes in ECG pattern or pulse rate
`were observed in any patient during the 10-min infusion
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`3 of 8
`
`

`

`1321
`
`Fig. 1. Mean (±SEM) plasma radioactivity expressed as percent-
`age of the injected dose in six patients after 177Lu-octreotate
`(closed dots, stippled line), compared with that in four other pa-
`tients after 111In-octreotide from a previous study [12] (open dots,
`solid line). *P<0.05 vs other radiopharmaceutical at the same time
`point
`
`Fig. 2. Cumulative radioactivity excreted in the urine, expressed
`as mean (±SEM) percentage of the injected dose in four patients
`after 177Lu-octreotate (closed bars), compared with that in six other
`patients after 111In-octreotide from a previous study [12] (open
`bars). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs other radiopharmaceutical during
`the same interval
`
`Fig. 3. Images comparing
`177Lu-octreotate and 111In-oct-
`reotide, 24 h p.i. Columns A
`and C: 177Lu-octreotate; col-
`umns B and D: 111In-octreotide.
`The first row shows corre-
`sponding images of tumour
`sites in a lymphoma patient
`(left two images) and a patient
`with an aesthesioneuroblastoma
`of the eye with a neck metasta-
`sis (right two images); second
`row: posterior (left two images)
`and anterior abdominal images
`in the same patients. The third
`row shows corresponding im-
`ages of tumours in a patient
`with residual Hürthle cell carci-
`noma (left two images) and a
`patient with papillary thyroid
`carcinoma (right two images);
`fourth row: anterior abdominal
`images in the same patients.
`Note the similar biodistribution
`and the clearer visualisation of
`the tumour sites, except in the
`patient with papillary thyroid
`carcinoma
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`4 of 8
`
`

`

`1322
`
`Fig. 5. Ratios of 177Lu-octreotate to 111In-octreotide uptake in or-
`gans and tumour sites, with uptake expressed as a percentage of
`the administered dose. Means are indicated. There is comparable
`organ uptake and higher tumour uptake after 177Lu-octreotate in
`most tumours
`
`Table 1. Patient organ doses in cGy (rad)/3,700 MBq (100 mCi)
`
`Patient Kidneys
`
`Liver
`
`Spleen
`
`Without AA With AA
`
`Bone
`marrow
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`Mean
`
`825
`533
`692
`359
`648
`611
`
`403
`–
`282
`252
`366
`326
`
`90
`76
`112
`44
`75
`79
`
`803
`1,010
`770
`662
`740
`797
`
`26
`29
`27
`27
`20
`26
`
`With AA: Kidney dose after amino acid co-infusion
`
`Urinary excretion of radioactivity in the first 24 h af-
`ter the injection of 177Lu-octreotate is shown in Fig. 2. In
`comparison with 111In-octreotide, the urinary excretion
`was significantly lower after 177Lu-octreotate, averaging
`64% after 24 h. Peptide-bound radioactivity in urine col-
`lected after 1 h in one patient showed the same pattern as
`the original injection fluid (data not shown).
`The scans obtained 24 h p.i. showed the same biodis-
`tribution for 177Lu-octreotate and 111In-octreotide, with
`comparable uptake in the liver, spleen and kidneys
`(Fig. 3). Also, variable radioactivity was seen in the
`bowel and urinary bladder. The uptake in the tumours
`seemed higher after 177Lu-octreotate, except in the pa-
`tient who had papillary thyroid carcinoma (Fig. 3). At la-
`ter time points, there was retention of the radioactivity in
`the tumours, even 17 days p.i. (Fig. 4). The calculated,
`background-corrected, uptake 24 h after 177Lu-octreotate
`expressed as a percentage of the injected dose was com-
`parable to that after 111In-octreotide for kidneys, spleen
`and liver, but was three- to fourfold higher for four of the
`five tumours (Fig. 5). In the patient with papillary thy-
`roid carcinoma, this uptake was about the same after
`both radiopharmaceuticals.
`
`Fig. 4. Images after 4 h and 1, 3 and 17 days (top row to lower
`row) in patients with Hürthle cell carcinoma (left column) and aes-
`thesioneuroblastoma (right column). Note the retention of radioac-
`tivity in the tumour sites
`
`of 177Lu-octreotate or up to 20 min thereafter. The distri-
`bution pattern of 177Lu-octreotate was comparable to that
`of 111In-octreotide, with rapid visualisation of the kid-
`neys directly after injection, and with visualisation of the
`liver, spleen, kidneys and, in some patients, the pituitary,
`thyroid and tumours 4 h p.i.
`Plasma radioactivity after 177Lu-octreotate expressed
`as a percentage of the injected dose was slightly, but sig-
`nificantly lower compared with 111In-octreotide measure-
`ments from a previous study [12]. After 24 h, however,
`they were comparable (Fig. 1).
`HPLC analysis of plasma, taken at 1 h p.i. in two pa-
`tients, demonstrated the same pattern as the original in-
`jection fluid (data not shown).
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`5 of 8
`
`

`

`1323
`
`Table 2. Dose estimates for 177Lu-octreotate, 111In-octreotide and 90Y-DOTA-octreotide
`
`Target organ
`
`Absorbed dose [cGy (rad)/3,700 MBq (100 mCi)]a
`
`177Lu-octreotate
`
`111In-octreotide
`
`90Y-DOTA-octreotide
`
`Kidneysb
`Liver
`Spleen
`Bone marrow
`Maximum cumulative dose (GBq)c
`Maximum cumulative dose (mCi)c
`
`610 (325)
`80
`800
`26
`26.4
`710
`
`(1)
`
`170
`30
`120
`7
`50.0
`1,350
`
`(2)
`
`190
`25
`130
`11
`44.8
`1,210
`
`(3)
`
`340
`90
`320
`23
`25.0
`680
`
`(4)
`
`2,240
`100
`1,980
`–
`
`(5)
`
`1,220
`260
`2,820
`11
`
`(6)
`
`1,040 (780)
`120
`–
`26
`10.9
`290
`
`(7)
`
`(788)
`–
`–
`–
`10.8
`290
`
`a Dosimetry data reported by: (1) Krenning et al. [13]; (2) Stabin
`et al. [14]; (3) McCarthy et al. [15]; (4) Kwekkeboom et al. [12]
`(dosimetry based on [111In-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide); (5) Crem-
`onesi et al. [16] (dosimetry based on [111In-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreo-
`tide); (6) Rosch et al. [17] (dosimetry based on [86Y-DOTA0,
`Tyr3]octreotide PET studies in primates); (7) Barone et al. [18]
`(dosimetry based on [86Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide PET studies in
`patients)
`
`b Kidney doses after amino acid co-infusion are shown within pa-
`rentheses
`c Mean maximum cumulative dose based on the maximum dose to
`the kidneys of 23 Gy. Values for 177Lu-octreotate and 90Y-DOTA-
`octreotide are with amino acid co-infusion
`
`Table 3. Theoretical maximum
`delivered tumour doses for
`three different radiolabelled so-
`matostatin analogues
`
`Absorbed dose (Gy)
`
`111In-octreotide
`
`90Y-DOTA-octreotide
`
`177Lu-octreotate
`
`Tumour 1 g
`Tumour 10 g
`Tumour uptake
`Maximum cumulative dose
`[mCi (GBq)]
`
`344
`36
`0.1%
`1,350 (50.0)
`
`563
`69
`0.2%
`290 (10.9)
`
`1,001
`102
`0.4%
`710 (26.4)
`
`Maximum cumulative doses are derived from Table 2. The calculations take into account the fact
`that the tumour uptake of [90Y-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotide is about two times higher [18], and that
`of 177Lu-octreotate about four times higher, (present study) than the tumour uptake of 111In-octreotide
`
`Dosimetry data are listed in Table 1. The highest ab-
`sorbed doses were to spleen and kidneys. In five pa-
`tients, scintigraphy was repeated several weeks later, af-
`ter co-infusion of amino acids (lysine 2.5%, arginine
`2.5%; 250 ml/h for 4 h, starting 30 min before the ad-
`ministration of 177Lu-octreotate). Calculated doses to the
`liver, spleen, bone marrow and tumours were about the
`same, whereas the doses to the kidneys were reduced by
`a mean of 47% (range 34%–59%) (Table 1).
`The dose estimates after 177Lu-octreotate are com-
`[90Y-
`those after 111In-octreotide and
`pared with
`DOTA,Tyr3]octreotide in Table 2. Compared with [90Y-
`DOTA,Tyr3]octreotide, the dose to the spleen and kid-
`neys was lower after 177Lu-octreotate, whereas the dose
`to the bone marrow was comparable or higher, depend-
`ing on the model that was used. Theoretical maximum
`tumour doses for 111In-octreotide, [90Y-DOTA,Tyr3]oct-
`reotide, and 177Lu-octreotate, based on a maximum kid-
`ney dose of 23 Gy, are listed in Table 3. The highest tu-
`mour doses in this model are achieved with 177Lu-octreo-
`tate, especially in smaller tumours.
`
`Discussion
`
`The somatostatin analogue Tyr3-octreotate, whether
`chelated with DTPA or DOTA, has been demonstrated to
`have a higher affinity than Tyr3-octreotide for the most
`frequently encountered somatostatin receptor, subtype 2,
`both in vitro and in vivo in animal experiments [8, 9,
`10]. Because the total administered therapeutic dose with
`radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is determined by
`organ dose limits, any newly developed analogues that
`show either a lower uptake in the dose-limiting organs
`(kidneys and/or bone marrow) or a higher uptake in the
`tumour targets, may improve such therapy. For this rea-
`son, we compared the distribution pattern and dosimetry
`of 177Lu-octreotate with those of 111In-octreotide in pa-
`tients. We found the same biodistribution for the ana-
`logues on scintigrams 24 h p.i., with comparable per-
`centage uptake in the liver, spleen and kidneys. The tu-
`mour uptake, however, was three- to fourfold higher in
`four of the five studied patients, implying that potentially
`higher doses to the tumour can be achieved with about
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`6 of 8
`
`

`

`1324
`equal dose-limiting organ doses. The comparability of
`the percentage uptake in the liver and kidneys for the
`two analogues is most likely due to the fact that the up-
`take in these organs is for the most part not receptor me-
`diated and is accounted for by excretion of the radio-
`pharmaceutical. Our finding that the uptake in the spleen
`was comparable for the two analogues may indicate that
`a considerable part of this uptake is due to binding to a
`somatostatin receptor subtype other than subtype 2. So-
`matostatin receptor subtype 2 has been demonstrated in
`the red pulp of the spleen by autoradiography [19]; how-
`ever, with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reac-
`tion (RT-PCR) techniques, mRNA for receptor subtype 3
`has also been demonstrated, located in the white pulp
`and with a much lower expression than for subtype 2
`[20]. It is therefore puzzling why the scintigraphic up-
`take in the spleen after 177Lu-octreotate is not much
`higher than after 111In-octreotide. The presence of other
`somatostatin receptor subtypes may explain why, in our
`patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma, uptake was not
`higher with 177Lu-octreotate than with 111In-octreotide.
`This is in agreement with an in vitro study using
`RT-PCR on human thyroid carcinoma cell lines, which
`demonstrated a predominance of mRNA for somatostatin
`receptor subtypes 3 and 5, but only very low amounts of
`mRNA for subtype 2 [21].
`We found a comparable, but slightly faster plasma
`disappearance for 177Lu-octreotate than for 111In-octreo-
`tide. More importantly, the cumulative urinary excretion
`after 24 h was significantly lower for 177Lu-octreotate
`than for 111In-octreotide. In another study [12], we found
`that the cumulative urinary excretion of [111In-DOTA0,
`Tyr3]octreotide was also significantly lower than that of
`[111In-DTPA0]octreotide. Because this analogue has the
`in common with [177Lu-DOTA0,
`tyrosine
`insertion
`Tyr3]octreotate, this may be the cause of the lower uri-
`nary excretion. This lower urinary excretion of 177Lu-
`octreotate results in a significantly higher absorbed bone
`marrow dose, because this dose is determined by the
`whole-body retention (i.e. injected minus excreted radio-
`activity minus activity in major target organs). Because
`of this, both the radiation dose to the kidneys and that to
`the bone marrow may be dose limiting in patient therapy
`with 177Lu-octreotate. It has previously been demonstrat-
`ed that the percentage uptake by and the radiation dose
`to the kidneys from 111In-octreotide can be lowered by
`the infusion of amino acids, both in animals and in pa-
`tients [22, 23]. In our group of patients, we found that
`this is also true for 177Lu-octreotate. This finding is im-
`portant because applying a dose limit to the kidneys of
`23 Gy, as is also applied for external beam radiation
`therapy, 14.0 GBq (380 mCi) would be the mean cumu-
`lative dose limit, whereas with the reduction due to ami-
`no acid
`infusion
`this
`limit would be 26.4 GBq
`(710 mCi). Barone et al. [18] compared the uptake after
`111In-octreotide and after [86Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide in
`the tumours and kidneys of five patients. They found
`
`that the percentage uptake in tumours was about two
`times higher after [86Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide, whereas
`it was about 1.4 times higher in the kidneys. Applying a
`dose limit of 23 Gy to the kidneys and accounting for
`amino acid co-infusion, the maximum cumulative dose
`of [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide would be 10.8 GBq
`(290 mCi) (Table 2). Using 177Lu-octreotate, the mean
`maximum cumulative dose that can be administered is
`26.4 GBq (710 mCi) (Table 2). Apart from the more than
`double mean maximum cumulative dose that can be ad-
`instead of [90Y-
`ministered using 177Lu-octreotate
`DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide, it should be considered that in
`this study we found a three- to fourfold higher tumour
`uptake with 177Lu-octreotate than with 111In-octreotide,
`whereas with [86Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide the tumour
`uptake was reported to be about twofold that of 111In-oct-
`reotide [18]. In a model calculation, based on the maxi-
`mum cumulative dose that can be given, the tumour dos-
`es that can be achieved with 177Lu-octreotate were higher
`than those for 111In-octreotide or [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]oct-
`reotide.
`There are four reasons why we used 177Lu and not 90Y
`as the radionuclide to label [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate:
`1. 177Lu-octreotate has been reported to have a very fa-
`vourable impact on tumour regression in a rat model
`[9].
`2. Reubi et al. [10] reported comparable affinities in the
`low nanomolar range for non-radioactive In and Y
`complexed [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate, implying that the
`modification in the peptide, and not the change in the
`metal, is primarily responsible for the improved affin-
`ity.
`3. With the 177Lu-labelled analogue it is possible to per-
`form dosimetry and therapy with the same compound
`while no PET scans with short-lived radionuclides are
`needed.
`4. The tissue penetration range of 177Lu (maximum
`range ≈2 mm) is more favourable than that of 90Y
`(maximum range ≈12 mm), especially for smaller tu-
`mours from which much of the radiation dose of 90Y
`will be lost to the surrounding tissues.
`Because of the advantages that both the modified so-
`matostatin analogue and the different radionuclide offer,
`we think that 177Lu-octreotate represents an improve-
`ment in somatostatin receptor-mediated radiotherapy. In-
`deed, we have already observed improvements in com-
`plaints, decreases in serum tumour markers and CT-as-
`sessed tumour shrinkage in patients who are being treat-
`ed with this new compound, although none of these pa-
`tients has yet received the maximum cumulative dose.
`In conclusion: In comparison with the radionuclide-
`coupled somatostatin analogues that are currently avail-
`able for somatostatin receptor-mediated radiotherapy,
`177Lu-octreotate potentially represents an important im-
`provement because of the higher absorbed doses that can
`be achieved to most tumours and because of the more fa-
`
`European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2001
`Evergreen Ex. 1010
`7 of 8
`
`

`

`vourable tissue penetration range, which may be espe-
`cially important for small tumours.
`
`Acknowledgements. The authors want to thank all the co-workers
`of the technical staff of the Department of Nuclear Medicine for
`their expert coo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket