throbber
From: Usman Khan <khan fr.com>
`
`Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:15 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@U5PTO.GOV>
`
`Cc: Karl Renner <renner@fr.com>; Kim Leung <Leung@fr.com>,' Cab@connorkudlaclee.com; dskeels@whitakerchalk.com;
`cbrooks@whitakerchalk.com; |PR39521—0091|P1@fr.com; PGR39521—0092P81@fr.com
`
`Subject: lPR2020—00999 81 PGR2020—00066: Request for Leave to File Pre—lnstitution Reply
`
`Re IPR2020-00999 8: PGRZOZO-OODGG
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner, Apple, respectfully requests leave to file a pre—institution reply to each ofthe POPRs filed by Pinn in the above—noted
`
`proceedings. Following is a list of the issues raised in the POPRs to which Apple will seek a brief, focused reply:
`
`{i}
`
`{ii}
`
`Aggle’s Stipulation: Apple has good cause to request briefing to address Pinn’s assertion that Apple violated terms of
`
`its stipulation.
`
`Discretionary denial pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 314la1: Apple has good cause to request briefing to address Pinn’s
`
`representations relating to antr'v factors, such as Pinn’s representation that grounds being asserted in litigation are
`the same as those being advanced in the petition, and Pinn’s characterization of Apple’s motives for challenging claim
`2 in the 491|PR and claim 7 in the 066 PGR.
`
`(iii)
`
`Discretionary denial pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 325ld1: Apple has good cause to request briefing to demonstrate why prior
`
`art cited by Pinn from within the prosecution history fails to support discretionary denial under 325(d] when properly
`applying Advanced Bionics.
`
`{iv}
`
`Prior Art Disclosure of and Pinn’s Construction of "wireless pairing”: Apple has good cause to request briefing to
`
`demonstrate why Pinn’s arguments and characterization related to the prior art’s disclosure (e.g., Rabu] of pairing are
`not consistent with the Special Master Report and the disclosure in the prior art.
`
`Apple’s counsel has conferred with Pinn’s counsel, who opposes these requests. Apple’s counsel requests a call at any of the
`
`following times:
`Thurs, Oct 1 at 3—4 PM EST
`
`Friday, Oct 2 at 12—2 PM EST or 2—5 PM EST
`
`If these times do not work, please suggest other times that are convenient for the Board. Pinn’s counsel was requested to
`
`provide their availability this week for a call with the Board. As of the time of this email, Apple’s counsel has not received
`information regarding the availability of Pinn’s counsel for a call with the Board.
`
`Please let us know if the Board requires anything further.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Usman A. Khan, Ph.D., Esq.
`
`
`
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`
`1000 Maine Ave., SW
`Suite 1000
`
`Washington, DC 20024
`202.626.6383 direct :: khan@fr.oom
`
`fr.com :: fl :: Linkedln
`
`‘k'k‘k'k‘k'k‘k'k‘k'kair:lrair:lrair:lr1k:l:1k:lr‘k:lr‘k:lr‘k:lr‘kilr‘kilr‘kdr‘kdr‘kdrirdr‘k-Jr‘k-Jrair-Jrair-Jrair-J:air:l:1|::l:1|::l:1|::lr‘k:lr‘k:lr‘k:lr‘kilr‘kdr‘kdr‘kdr‘kdr‘kdr‘k-kk-k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k‘k
`
`
`
`This email message is for the sole use 0:: the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`
`EX. 3001
`
`Ex. 3001
`
`

`

`4.
`coniidential and privileged in_ormation. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is
`
`prohibited. I: you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
`email and destroy a'l copies o: the original message.
`‘kfir‘k‘k‘kfir‘k‘k‘k‘Jr'k‘k'k‘Jr'k‘Jr'kit'kit'kit'kit‘kit'k‘k'kit'k‘k'kit'k‘k'k‘k'kit'k‘k'kit'k‘k‘kit‘k‘k‘kit‘kit‘kit‘kit‘kit‘k‘k‘kit‘ktttttttt‘kttt‘kttttttfirtt‘kfir
`
`
`
`
`
`EX. 3001
`
`Ex. 3001
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket