`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`INFERNAL TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`TERMINAL REALITY, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA, LLC, SONY INTERACTIVE
`ENTERTAINMENT LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00248-JRG
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiffs Infernal Technology, LLC and Terminal Reality Inc.’s
`
`(“Plaintiffs”) Unopposed Motion to Amend the Docket Control Order (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No.
`
`87.) In the same, the Plaintiffs request that the Court extend their post-Markman deadlines by six
`
`months in light of the COVID-19 outbreak. Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the
`
`opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
`
`The Court notes that the current situation with the COVID-19 outbreak is both serious and
`
`constantly evolving. That said, the current deadline for fact discovery in this case is June 15, 2020,
`
`and the Court is hopeful that things will have generally improved before that date. Given the
`
`uncertainties faced by all concerned, the Court is reluctant, at this time, to assume that there is no
`
`likelihood of generally improved conditions by mid-June. The parties, thus, are free to renew their
`
`motion and seek relief at a later date if the situation has not improved. The Court does not wish to
`
`prejudice any party or put any party at risk, but in the Court’s view there is simply too much
`
`uncertainty at this point to warrant the relief presently sought in the Motion. Another look at a later
`
`time, when we all know more, seems the prudent course of action.
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1042
`
`
`
`2
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of March, 2020.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
