throbber
IV. NKF-K/DOQI CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR
`ANEMIA OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE:
`UPDATE 2000
`
`NOTE: The citation for these guidelines should read as follows: National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI
`Clinical Practice Guidelines for Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease, 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 37:S182-S238,
`2001 (suppl 1)
`
`S182
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Acronyms and Abbreviations
`
`Abbreviation
`AIDS
`BSA
`CAPD
`CBC
`CKD
`CRF
`EPO
`ESRD
`FDA
`Fe
`GFR
`HCFA
`Hct
`Hgb
`IP
`IV
`LVH
`PD
`PET
`PMMA
`PTFE
`RBC
`SC
`SLE
`TIBC
`TSAT
`USRDS
`
`Term
`acquired immune deficiency syndrome
`body surface area
`continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
`complete blood count
`chronic kidney disease
`chronic renal failure
`erythropoietin
`end-stage renal disease
`Food and Drug Administration
`iron
`glomerular filtration rate
`Health Care Financing Administration
`hematocrit
`hemoglobin
`intraperitoneal
`intravenous
`left ventricular hypertrophy
`peritoneal dialysis
`positron-emission tomography
`polymethylmethacrylate
`polytetrafluoroethylene
`red blood cell
`subcutaneous
`systemic lupus erythematosus
`total iron binding capacity
`transferrin saturation
`United States Renal Data System
`
`S183
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Introduction
`
`ANORMOCYTIC, normochromic anemia is
`
`present in the majority of patients who
`have a reduction in kidney function.3 The same
`pathophysiology underlies this anemia in all such
`patients. In these guidelines, the term “chronic
`kidney disease” (CKD) is used to describe pa-
`tients with chronically reduced kidney function,
`including those with chronic allograft dysfunc-
`tion, and those in kidney failure who are dialysis
`dependent (administratively termed ESRD).
`When untreated, the anemia of CKD is associ-
`ated with a number of physiologic abnormalities,
`including decreased tissue oxygen delivery and
`utilization,4-8 increased cardiac output, cardiac
`enlargement, ventricular hypertrophy, angina,
`congestive heart failure,9-14 decreased cognition
`and mental acuity,15 altered menstrual cycles,16-18
`decreased nocturnal penile tumescence,19 and
`impaired immune responsiveness.20,21 In addi-
`tion, anemia may play a role in growth retarda-
`tion and decreased intellectual performance in
`pediatric patients.22,23 These abnormalities re-
`duce quality of life24 and opportunities for reha-
`bilitation of CKD patients and decrease patient
`survival.25
`The primary cause of anemia in patients with
`CKD is insufficient production of erythropoietin
`(EPO) by the diseased kidneys.26 Additional fac-
`tors which may cause or contribute to the anemia
`include: iron deficiency,27 either related to or
`independent of blood loss from repeated labora-
`tory testing, needle punctures, blood retention in
`the dialyzer and tubing, or gastrointestinal bleed-
`ing; severe hyperparathyroidism28; acute and
`chronic inflammatory conditions29; aluminum
`toxicity30; folate deficiency31; shortened red blood
`cell survival32; hypothyroidism33; and hemoglo-
`binopathies such as ␣-thalassemia.33 These poten-
`tial contributing factors, if relevant, should be
`considered and addressed.
`Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO)
`has been used in the treatment of the anemia of
`CKD since 1986.34,35 This recombinant hormone
`has been referred to by several names, including
`rHuEPO, EPO, Epoetin, Epoetin alfa, Epoetin
`beta, and erythropoietin. Epoetin alfa (manufac-
`
`© 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
`0272-6386/01/3701-0105$3.00/0
`doi:10.1053/ajkd.2001.20787
`
`tured by Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA; distrib-
`uted in the United States as Epogen by Amgen,
`Inc, and as Procrit by Ortho Biotech, Johnson &
`Johnson) is the only approved recombinant hu-
`man erythropoietin (rHuEPO) product available
`in the United States. In addition to Epoetin alfa,
`Epoetin beta, another rHuEPO product with simi-
`lar pharmacologic effects, is available in other
`countries but not the United States. Clinical trials
`with both Epoetin alfa and Epoetin beta have
`been performed within and outside of the United
`States, and the clinical response to both has been
`similar. These guidelines for the management of
`anemia are based upon available literature for
`both products. Since these guidelines may be
`used outside as well as within the United States,
`the term “Epoetin,” when used throughout the
`guidelines, should be assumed to apply to both
`Epoetin alfa and beta. Situations that apply only
`to Epoetin alfa are clearly indicated.
`A new erythropoietin-like molecule, called
`NESP, or novel erythropoietic stimulating pro-
`tein (manufactured by Amgen, Inc), is being
`used in clinical trials and as of July 2000 is being
`reviewed by the FDA. NESP is a glycoprotein
`similar to erythropoietin, but has 5 additional
`amino acids in its primary sequence and two
`extra N-linked carbohydrate side chains, giving
`it a longer plasma half-life. There have been no
`peer-reviewed clinical studies published about
`this molecularly engineered hormone prior to
`January 2000 when the structured literature re-
`view of this update was closed.
`Iron is also essential for hemoglobin forma-
`tion. The iron status of the patient with CKD
`must be assessed and adequate iron stores should
`be available before Epoetin therapy is initiated.
`Iron supplementation usually is essential to as-
`sure an adequate response to Epoetin in patients
`with CKD because the demands for iron by the
`erythroid marrow frequently exceed the amount
`of iron that is immediately available for erythro-
`poiesis (as measured by percent transferrin satu-
`ration) as well as iron stores (as measured by
`serum ferritin). In most cases, intravenous iron
`will be required to achieve and/or maintain ad-
`equate iron stores. In the United States as of July
`1999, the commercially available intravenous
`iron preparations consist of iron dextran, manu-
`
`S184
`
`AmericanJournalofKidneyDiseases,Vol 37, No 1, Suppl 1 (January), 2001: pp S184-S185
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 3
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`S185
`
`factured as INFeD by Watson Pharmaceutical,
`Inc, Nephrology Division (formerly Schein Phar-
`maceutical, Inc.) and as Dexferrum by American
`Regent Laboratories Inc and sodium ferric glu-
`conate complex in sucrose (referred to in this text
`as iron gluconate), manufactured as Ferrlecit by
`R & D Laboratories and marketed by Watson
`Pharmaceutical, Inc, Nephrology Division (for-
`merly Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc.). An addi-
`tional intravenous iron preparation, iron sucrose
`(Venofer, manufactured by American Regent Lab-
`oratories, Inc), was approved by the FDA in
`November 2000. The molecular weights of the
`two iron dextran compounds differ, and they will
`be considered different compounds.
`Effective treatment of the anemia of CKD
`improves survival,36 decreases morbidity,37,38 and
`increases quality of life.24,39 These 27 clinical
`practice guidelines, which cover the diagnosis,
`work-up, and management of the anemia of
`CKD, as well as possible sequelae related to its
`therapy, provide information that will help care-
`givers accomplish these goals. Unless otherwise
`specified, these guidelines, and their rationales,
`apply to all age groups.
`The potential impact of these guidelines on
`aggregate use of Epoetin is unknown. For ex-
`ample,
`these guidelines recommend a higher
`target Hgb/Hct than is used in current practice
`and than has been recommended on the basis of
`an evaluation of evidence performed by Cana-
`dian nephrologists.40 All other things being equal,
`this recommendation would increase the amount
`of Epoetin required. On the other hand,
`the
`guidelines also have recommended maintenance
`
`of iron stores for the support of erythropoiesis
`that are greater than those maintained in current
`practice. This recommendation should produce
`an Epoetin-sparing effect. In addition, the guide-
`lines recommend that Epoetin be administered
`by the subcutaneous (SC) route to most patients.
`This should provide an improved Hgb/Hct re-
`sponse for the same Epoetin dose, again produc-
`ing an Epoetin-sparing effect. The likely net
`impact of these different effects is difficult to
`predict.
`Some of the practices recommended in these
`guidelines are at variance with current policy of
`the Health Care Financing Administration
`(HCFA) and with information contained in the
`package inserts for Epoetin (Guideline 25) and
`iron dextran (Guideline 9). In these instances, the
`Anemia Work Group believes there is sufficient
`published scientific data to justify its recommen-
`dations. In most circumstances, recommenda-
`tions contained in this document are based on
`evidence from the medical literature.
`When recommendations are based on evi-
`dence, a rationale and supporting literature refer-
`ences are indicated. When recommendations are
`based on opinion in the absence of published
`evidence, the rationales for the recommendations
`are described. In some instances, however, recom-
`mendations are based in whole or in part on the
`opinion of the Work Group members. The eviden-
`tiary basis (published evidence, opinion, or both)
`for all recommendations is clearly indicated,
`along with the rationale (chain of reasoning) for
`each recommendation.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 4
`
`

`

`I. Anemia Work-Up
`
`GUIDELINE 1
`
`When to Initiate the Work-Up of Anemia
`
`An anemia work-up should be initiated in
`patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) when
`the:
`● Hgb ⬍11g/dL (Hct is ⬍33%) in pre-meno-
`pausal females and pre-pubertal patients
`(Evidence)
`● Hgb ⬍12g/dL (Hct is ⬍37%) in adult males
`and post-menopausal females (Evidence)
`Rationale Anemia is defined in terms of the
`Hgb or Hct concentration. In this guideline, we
`recommend that a work-up of anemia be initiated
`when the Hgb/ Hct level declines to approxi-
`mately 80% of the mean level for defined healthy,
`normal subgroups (see Table IV-1: eg, in fe-
`males, 80% of Hct 41 ⫽ Hct 33; in males, 80%
`of Hct 47 ⫽ Hct 37). Differences in average
`Hgb/Hct levels between adult men and women
`are likely due to differences in estrogen and
`testosterone production that emerge at puberty,
`but subside after menopause. Anemia is likely to
`be present in individuals when Hgb/ Hct concen-
`trations are below these levels. However, the
`mean Hgb/ Hct in the general population is only
`a statistical benchmark and may not be the best
`indication of anemia in every individual. For
`example, there is a 75% likelihood of anemia in
`an adult female with a Hct of 34% or a Hgb of 11
`g/dL, or in a male with a Hct of 39% or a Hgb of
`12.5 g/dL. Moreover, many individuals have
`Hgb/Hct concentrations which are physiologi-
`cally normal for them, but which would be
`defined as anemia in terms of the general popula-
`tion data. Others have a Hgb/Hct level that may
`be physiologically inadequate for them (eg, pa-
`tients with chronic obstructive pulmonary dis-
`ease), even though it falls within the range con-
`sidered normal for the general population.
`In hemodialysis patients, blood samples to
`document and monitor anemia should be ob-
`tained prior to or immediately upon initiation of
`the dialysis procedure (predialysis). While a Hgb/
`Hct obtained at the end of the dialysis procedure
`(postdialysis) may relate better to a patient’s
`estimated dry weight, experience and data re-
`ported in the literature universally refer to predi-
`alysis Hct and Hgb levels; hence the need to
`
`relate these guidelines to predialysis blood
`samples.
`An automated cell counter should be used to
`determine RBC indices, Hct, and Hgb because
`the results are more easily standardized. Auto-
`mated cell counters also have the advantage of
`providing a total white blood cell count and,
`often, a platelet count.
`Outside of the United States, Hgb, rather than
`Hct, is used to quantify the level of anemia in
`patients with CKD. There are several reasons
`why Hgb is a more accurate, and hence better
`measure of anemia than is Hct. First, whereas
`Hgb is stable when a blood sample is stored at
`room temperature, Hct is not. Specifically, MCV
`(from which Hct is calculated: MCV ⫻ erythro-
`cyte count ⫽ Hct) is stable at room temperature
`for only 8 hours and is stable for only 24 hours
`when a blood sample is refrigerated.41 When a
`blood sample is stored for longer periods of time,
`MCV increases, resulting in increases in calcu-
`lated Hct by as much as 2% to 4%.42 In contrast,
`Hgb remains unchanged when a blood sample is
`stored for the same amount of time under the
`same conditions.42 The sensitivity of Hct to blood
`sample storage conditions is particularly impor-
`tant in light of increased consolidation in the
`dialysis industry in the United States and the
`resulting tendency for dialysis centers that com-
`prise a given dialysis chain to ship blood samples
`over variable distances, under poorly controlled
`conditions, to centralized laboratories.
`A second reason why Hgb is a more accurate
`measure than Hct is that in the presence of
`hyperglycemia, MCV (but not Hgb) is falsely
`elevated, resulting in a false elevation of calcu-
`lated Hct.43,44 Finally, there is greater variability
`across automated analyzers in estimation of the
`number and size of erythrocytes that are in a
`blood sample (and hence in calculation of Hct)
`than there is in measurement of Hgb.45 Data
`comparing the within-run and between-run coef-
`ficient of variation (CV) in automated analyzer
`measurements have shown that these CVs for
`measurement of Hgb are one half and one third
`those for Hct, respectively.46
`For all these reasons, Hgb is a better measure
`to use to monitor and manage anemia in patients
`with CKD than is Hct, particularly given the
`
`S186
`
`AmericanJournalofKidneyDiseases,Vol 37, No 1, Suppl 1 (January), 2001: pp S186-S189
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 5
`
`

`

`ANEMIA WORK-UP
`
`S187
`
`Table IV-1. Mean Normal Values of Hemoglobin and
`Hematocrit for the Healthy, Normal Population47
`
`Age/Gender
`
`Birth
`1 month
`2 to 6 months
`6 months to 2 years
`2 to 6 years
`6 to 12 years
`12 to 18 years (male)
`Menstruating female
`Adult male/post-menopausal
`female
`
`Hemoglobin
`(g/dL)
`
`Hematocrit
`(%)
`
`16.5 ⫾ 3.0
`14.0 ⫾ 4.0
`11.5 ⫾ 2.5
`12.0 ⫾ 1.5
`12.5 ⫾ 1.0
`13.5 ⫾ 2.0
`14.5 ⫾ 1.5
`14.0 ⫾ 2.0
`15.5 ⫾ 2.0
`
`51 ⫾ 9
`43 ⫾ 6
`35 ⫾ 7
`36 ⫾ 3
`37 ⫾ 3
`40 ⫾ 5
`43 ⫾ 6
`41 ⫾ 5
`47 ⫾ 6
`
`growing tendency for dialysis centers to send
`blood samples to outside laboratories, rather than
`measuring Hgb or Hct in-house. In addition, use
`of hemoglobin will allow better comparison of
`anemia management between countries, since
`most other countries use measurement of hemo-
`globin as the standard. Therefore, the Anemia
`Work Group strongly urges that hemoglobin be
`the primary means of quantifying the level of
`anemia in patients with CKD.
`
`GUIDELINE 2
`Anemia Evaluation
`A. Evaluation of anemia should consist of mea-
`the following: (Evi-
`surement of at
`least
`dence)
`
`● Hemoglobin (Hgb) and/or Hematocrit (Hct)
`● Red blood cell (RBC) indices
`● Reticulocyte count
`● Iron parameters:
`—Serum iron
`—Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)
`—Percent transferrin saturation (serum iron ⫻
`100 divided by TIBC) [TSAT]
`—Serum ferritin
`● A test for occult blood in stool
`● B. This work-up should be performed before
`Epoetin therapy is begun. (Opinion)
`Rationale The red blood cell indices, reticulo-
`cyte count (an index of new red blood cell
`formation), and iron parameters are helpful to
`detect the cause of many anemias which are not
`due to EPO deficiency.48 The anemia of CKD is
`generally normocytic and normochromic. Micro-
`cytosis may reflect iron deficiency, aluminum
`
`excess, or certain hemoglobinopathies; macrocy-
`tosis may be associated with vitamin B12 or
`folate deficiency. Macrocytosis can also be asso-
`ciated with iron excess49 and/or Epoetin therapy
`that shifts immature, larger reticulocytes into
`circulation. An elevated reticulocyte count (cor-
`rected for the degree of anemia) suggests that
`active hemolysis may be present, such as in acute
`renal failure due to the hemolytic uremic syn-
`drome. An abnormal white blood cell count and/or
`platelet count may reflect a more generalized
`disturbance of bone marrow function, such as
`that due to malignancy or vasculitis.
`Iron is critical for Hgb synthesis. Conse-
`quently, patients should be carefully evaluated
`for the availability of iron, by measuring the
`serum iron and the TIBC. The serum iron and the
`percent TSAT reflect the amount of iron immedi-
`ately available for hemoglobin synthesis. The
`serum ferritin reflects total body iron stores. A
`low level of either of these indices may indicate
`the need for supplemental iron to support eryth-
`ropoiesis. Iron deficiency has been shown to be
`present in as many as 25% to 37.5% of patients
`presenting with the anemia of CKD50,51 and, if
`treated, can at least temporarily improve or cor-
`rect the anemia52 (Endnote a). Absolute iron
`deficiency in the general population is indicated
`by a TSAT of less than 16%53 and/or a serum
`ferritin value of less than 12 ng/mL.54 However,
`higher values of TSAT and serum ferritin may be
`necessary to achieve an erythropoietic response
`prior to initiation of Epoetin therapy (Endnote a)
`and higher values for these parameters will be
`required to support accelerated erythropoiesis
`stimulated by pharmacological administration of
`Epoetin (see Guideline 6: Target Iron Level). The
`presence of iron deficiency requires a search for
`the cause, which is usually blood loss. A stool
`guaiac test for occult blood is recommended to
`test for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with
`iron deficiency. Another test for early iron defi-
`ciency is an increase in the number of hypochro-
`mic red blood cells determined by certain auto-
`analyzers,
`ie, Technicon H-1, H-2, and H-3
`Autoanalyzers (Bayer Diagnostics). A hypochro-
`mic red blood cell is defined as an individual cell
`with an Hgb concentration of ⬍28 g/dL. Nor-
`mally, less than 2.5% of red blood cells are
`hypochromic. Although the autoanalyzer used to
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 6
`
`

`

`S188
`
`GUIDELINES FOR ANEMIA OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
`
`Fig IV-1. Anemia work-up
`for CKD patients. Asterisk in-
`dicates that laboratory val-
`ues are consistent with un-
`complicated iron deficiency.
`
`perform this test is available in Europe,55,56 it is
`not readily available in the United States at this
`time. Because of the limited availability of these
`autoanalyzers in the United States, this test has
`not been included as part of the guideline. How-
`ever, if such technology becomes routinely avail-
`able in the United States, this test should be
`considered in the work-up of the anemia of
`CKD, particularly since Epoetin therapy may
`increase the likelihood of functional iron defi-
`ciency.
`In CKD patients without iron deficiency, it is
`prudent to screen for common causes of anemia
`other than EPO deficiency (see Guideline 3:
`Erythropoietin Deficiency). Correcting an easily
`reversible cause of anemia makes both clinical
`and economic sense. An example is hypothyroid-
`ism, which is common in the general population,
`
`and can cause a normochromic, normocytic ane-
`mia that can mimic the anemia due to EPO
`deficiency.33 If a reversible cause of anemia is
`not present or has been corrected, and EPO
`deficiency is the likely primary cause of the
`anemia, then anemia should be treated with Epo-
`etin to improve patient quality of life,24 to im-
`prove the various physiological abnormalities
`associated with anemia, to decrease morbidity,37
`to decrease hospitalization,57 and to improve
`patient survival.36
`
`GUIDELINE 3
`
`Erythropoietin Deficiency
`
`If no cause for anemia other than CKD is
`detected, based on the work-up outlined in Guide-
`line 2: Anemia Evaluation, and the serum creati-
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 7
`
`

`

`ANEMIA WORK-UP
`
`S189
`
`nine is ⱖ2 mg/dL, anemia is most likely due to
`EPO deficiency. Measurement of serum EPO
`levels usually is not indicated. Fig IV-1 provides
`a guideline for the work-up of anemia in patients
`with a serum creatinine ⱖ2 mg/dL, and for those
`occasional patients with a lower serum creatinine
`and impaired kidney function who have a normo-
`cytic, normochromic anemia. (Evidence)
`Rationale As kidney function declines, the
`likelihood of anemia associated with EPO defi-
`ciency increases because the diseased kidneys
`are unable to produce sufficient quantities of
`EPO. Anemia can develop relatively early in the
`course of CKD, however, and has been associ-
`ated with a serum creatinine as low as 2.0 mg/
`dL,58 and occasionally even lower, particularly
`in individuals with a reduced muscle mass. On
`the other hand, there is a wide range of Hgb/Hct
`levels for any degree of kidney dysfunction. Two
`studies have found a linear relationship between
`Hct and creatinine clearance in pediatric pa-
`tients. A linear relationship between GFR and
`Hct was observed in 48 pediatric patients in one
`study,59 and in 31 CKD pediatric patients in
`another study when the GFR was estimated from
`
`the serum creatinine.60 In these two studies,
`significant anemia was noted when the GFR was
`less than 20 and 35 mL/min/1.73 m2, respec-
`tively.
`The anemia of CKD should not be confused
`with the anemia of chronic disease. In the latter,
`inflammatory cytokines suppress the endoge-
`nous production of EPO and erythropoiesis di-
`rectly.61,62 Measurable levels of circulating cyto-
`kines may be found in stable dialysis patients,
`but,
`in the absence of inflammation, do not
`appear to adversely affect the action of Epo-
`etin63,64 (see Guideline 20: Causes for Inadequate
`Response to Epoetin).
`In patients with non-renal anemia, serum EPO
`levels are usually elevated in an effort to compen-
`sate for the anemia. In patients with impaired
`kidney function and a normochromic, normo-
`cytic anemia, it is rare for the serum EPO level to
`be elevated. Therefore, measurement of EPO
`levels in such patients is not likely to guide
`clinical decision-making or Epoetin therapy.
`Figure IV-1 suggests an approach for evaluat-
`ing anemia in CKD patients who do not have
`gastrointestinal bleeding.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 8
`
`

`

`II. Target Hemoglobin/Hematocrit
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`The initial patient experience with Epoetin
`came in a Phase I-II clinical trial in hemodialysis
`patients with the anemia of CKD. The target
`maintenance Hct for these patients was 35% to
`40%, ie, at the lower range of normal.35 When
`investigators met to design the Phase III multi-
`center clinical trial, hematologists argued that the
`target Hct should be a normal Hct, while neph-
`rologists proposed a lower level. A compromise
`target Hct of 35% was used in the trial. The final
`Hct levels for the more than 300 patients treated
`with Epoetin in the Phase III trial ranged from
`33% to 38%. The results of this study,65 together
`with those of the Phase I-II clinical trial, were
`submitted to the FDA. The FDA approved Epo-
`etin therapy in June, 1989, but the target Hct
`range recommended by the FDA was only 30%
`to 33%, for reasons that have never been clear.
`The FDA recommendation is probably respon-
`sible for the previously held belief that a target
`Hct of 30% to 33% is medically appropriate. In
`spite of the FDA’s decision in June 1994 to
`widen the target hematocrit range to 30% to
`36%, the USRDS data derived from practice in
`1993 (United States Renal Data System 1996
`Annual Data Report)66 showed that the mean Hct
`for Epoetin-treated dialysis patients in the United
`States was still in the lower end of this target
`range (30.2%), with 43% of patients having Hct
`values ⬍30%. By the end of 1997 the mean Hct
`increased to 32.4% (USRDS 1999 Annual Data
`Report).67
`Most of the initial physiologic and quality of
`life studies of anemic predialysis and dialysis
`patients treated with Epoetin in the United States
`had target Hct values of ⱖ36%. Virtually all
`studies have shown that, with increased Hct,
`there is marked improvement in various physi-
`ologic measures—oxygen utilization [VO2]4-8;
`muscle strength and function68; cognitive and
`brain electrophysiological function15; cardiac
`function9,12-14,69,70; sexual function18; or quality
`of life.24 While two reports have cautioned that a
`target Hct greater than 30% could result in clot-
`ting of various arteries, as well as underdialy-
`sis,71,72 these predictions have failed to material-
`ize or be substantiated. Two other groups of
`investigators reported that there were no differ-
`
`ences in various physiologic and quality of life
`measures between hemodialysis patients with
`Hct (or Hgb) levels of 30% (9 to 10 g/dL) versus
`36% (11 to 12 g/dL).73-75 However, a re-examina-
`tion of these data allows for a different conclu-
`sion: the data are difficult to interpret in one
`study, and some physiological parameters were
`better at the higher Hgb/Hct in the other study
`(Endnote b). The authors of one of these studies
`have recently completed various physiological
`and quality of life studies in a small number of
`hemodialysis patients and have clearly shown
`that a normal Hgb (14 g/dL) is superior to a Hgb
`of 10 g/dL.76-79
`Since 1989, when the FDA established its
`guidelines for the target Hct, and the Health Care
`Financing Administration (HCFA) established a
`policy under which it would not reimburse dialy-
`sis centers for the use of Epoetin when the Hct
`was above 36%, there have been few studies
`published in the United States which examine
`whether a Hct higher than 36% is more beneficial
`than a Hct of 30% in dialysis patients. While
`there are many studies that have shown the
`benefits of Hct values ⱖ36%, in most cases the
`comparison was made to outcomes of patients
`with an Hct level of ⬍25% (see above). In order
`to formulate our recommendations regarding the
`target Hgb/Hct, the Anemia Work Group re-
`viewed only peer-reviewed studies that com-
`pared baseline Hgb/Hct levels of 10 to 11 g/dL/
`30% to 33% (which is the current target level in
`the United States and most other countries) to
`higher values. Review of the literature which
`involved predialysis and dialysis patients within
`and outside the United States showed that, com-
`pared to higher Hgb/Hct values, Hgb/Hct values
`11 g/dL/⬍33% are associated with increased
`morbidity and mortality. In addition, a number of
`recent United States and non-United States stud-
`ies reported in abstracts indicate that patients
`with CKD function better at Hct levels that are
`near normal or normal and that improvement is
`continuous as the Hgb/Hct increases above 10
`g/dL/30% to normal levels. The only exception
`to this has been a study sponsored by Amgen that
`involved more than 1,200 hemodialysis patients
`with documented heart disease. This study was
`discontinued when it appeared that those patients
`
`S190
`
`AmericanJournalofKidneyDiseases,Vol 37, No 1, Suppl 1 (January), 2001: pp S190-S193
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 9
`
`

`

`TARGET HEMOGLOBIN/HEMATOCRIT
`
`S191
`
`randomized to a target Hct in the normal range
`(42% ⫾ 3%) were experiencing a greater inci-
`dence (30%, with a confidence interval of 0.9 to
`1.9) of non-fatal myocardial infarctions or death
`than did the control group randomized to a target
`Hct of 30% ⫾ 3%.80 The difference was not
`statistically significant at the time the study was
`terminated, however. Additional studies are
`needed to clarify the relationship between Hgb/
`Hct and outcomes in CKD patients, particularly
`those with heart disease. Such studies should be
`designed to determine the highest Hgb/Hct that
`provides incremental benefits without serious
`side effects. Several multicenter studies address-
`ing this question are in progress outside the
`United States. A study determining whether the
`“prevention” of anemia and its associated ad-
`verse effects could also be of value, since one of
`the aims of treating anemia is to prevent or retard
`the development of heart disease.
`
`GUIDELINE 4
`Target Hemoglobin/Hematocrit for
`Epoetin Therapy
`
`The target range for hemoglobin (hematocrit)
`should be Hgb 11 g/dL (33%) to Hgb 12 g/dL
`(36%). (Evidence) This target is for Epoetin
`therapy and is not an indication for blood transfu-
`sion therapy. (Opinion)
`Rationale A Hgb of 11 g/dL (Hct 33%) is at
`the lower limit of the normal range for pre-
`menopausal females and pre-pubertal patients; a
`Hgb of 12 g/dL (Hct 36%) is just below the lower
`limit of the normal range for adult males and
`post-menopausal females (see Guideline 1: When
`to Initiate the Work-up of Anemia). Because the
`anemia literature in CKD patients does not distin-
`guish between sexes, subsequent Hgb/Hct levels
`will apply to both males and females.
`There are several pieces of evidence suggest-
`ing that patient outcomes are worse when the
`Hgb is ⱕ10 g/dL (Hct ⱕ30%):
`1. Survival of dialysis patients declines as the
`Hct decreases below a range of 30% to 33%.25,81
`Survival was also shorter in dialysis patients
`with chronic glomerulonephritis whose mean
`Hgb level was 9.9 g/dL, compared to patients
`with polycystic kidney disease whose mean Hgb
`level was 11.3 g/dL.82 Whereas one study failed
`to note any improved survival at a Hgb ⬎11 g/dL
`
`compared to an Hgb 10 to 11 g/dL,83 several
`other reports have shown improved survival at
`higher Hgb/Hct levels. Survival was improved in
`Italian hemodialysis patients when the Hct ex-
`ceeded 32%, either spontaneously or following
`Epoetin therapy, when compared to Hct ⬍32%,84
`and in the United States an Hct of 33% to 36%
`reduced the risk of death from any cause by 10%
`when compared to patients whose mean Hct was
`30% to 33%.85 Survival has been noted in one
`study to be better in patients with cardiac disease
`who attained and maintained a normal Hct com-
`pared to similar patients who did not attain and
`maintain a normal Hct.80 In fact, within both the
`normal Hct group and the control group, the
`mortality decreased at higher Hct levels.80 In
`those 200 patients who achieved and maintained
`a normal Hct for 6 months, mortality decreased
`to approximately 15% per year, versus 40% per
`year in those maintained at an Hct of 30%. There
`were no convincing factors that appeared to
`explain why those patients that did not achieve
`and stabilize at a normal Hct had a greater
`incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarctions or
`death than did the control group.80
`2. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is more
`likely in CKD patients with anemia (Hct
`ⱕ33%)86-88 and in patients with ESRD89; in such
`patients the risk of death is increased 2.9-fold
`(Endnote c).90 Partial correction of anemia (Hgb
`6.3 ⫾ 0.8 to 11.4 ⫾ 1.5 g/dL) with Epoetin
`resulted in partial regression of LVH in dialysis-
`dependent patients.91 Angina was significantly
`decreased in patients with progressive CKD when
`Epoetin therapy increased the Hct to 31% ⫾ 4%
`versus 23% ⫾ 4%.92
`3. Quality of life either is not improved, or
`improved only slightly, when the Hgb/Hct is
`increased from 8 g/dL/25% to a level no higher
`than 9 to 10 g/dL/28% to 30%.93-95 However,
`quality of life of dialysis patients, as assessed by
`standardized patient questionnaires, increases as
`the Hgb/Hct increases above 10 to ⬎12 g/dL and
`30% to ⬎36%.96-98 When the results of the Am-
`gen Phase III (mean Hct 35%) and Phase IV
`(mean Hct 30%) studies were compared, it was
`concluded that patients with Hct levels of 35%
`had better quality of life as measured by Karnof-
`sky scores than those maintained at a Hct of
`30%.99 Both quality of life and various physiolog-
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1100 - Page 10
`
`

`

`S192
`
`GUIDELINES FOR ANEMIA OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
`
`ical parameters in predialysis patients have been
`shown to be significantly better at a Hct of 36%
`to 39% than at 27% to 29%.100-107
`4. In hemodialysis patients, exercise capacity
`(VO2) increased when the Hct increased from
`30% to 35% to 40%.108
`5. In hemodialysis patients, the incidence of
`hospitalization was lower when the Hct was 33%
`to 36% in comparison to patients with lower Hct
`values.109
`6. There are a number of studies in dialysis
`patients (reported initially only in abstracts) that
`indicate that quality of life, maximum exercise
`capacity, number of meters walked in 6 minutes,
`cardiac output, cognitive function, amino acid
`levels, sleep dysfunction with daytime sleepi-
`ness, insulin resistance with hyperlipidemia, and
`survival
`improved when a normal Hct was
`achieved,76-78,110-118 and that there were no ad-
`verse effects observed at a normal Hct.110,111
`Several of these studies have now been pub-
`lished in peer review journals, and demonstrate
`that a normal Hgb/Hct is associated with better
`physical performance,79 better cognitive func-
`tion,119 improved brain oxygen supply,120 and
`improved sleep patterns121 compared to lower
`Hgb/Hct levels.
`Studies in patients with anemia due to condi-
`tions other than CKD als

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket