throbber
I i i
`
`Reprinted from
`
`UICC Monograph Series
`Volume 7: Potential Carcinogenic Hazards from Drugs
`Edited by RENE TRUHAUT
`
`Springer-Verlag Berlin· Heidelberg· New York 1967
`
`Printed in Germany / Not a periodical
`On Potential Carcinogenecity of the Iron
`Macromolecular Complexes
`F. J.C. ROE
`Reader in Experimental Pathology, Chester Beatty Research Institute,
`University of London, and Associate Pathologist, Royal Marsden Hospital, London,
`Great Britain
`
`Introduction
`SAUNDERS (1958) provides a brief
`review of the history of iron in medical
`treatment. Oxides and carbonates of
`iron have found a place in therapy from
`ancient times. Their use is mentioned in
`the Ebers Papyrus, and Dioscorides,
`Galen, Celsus and Aetius advocated iron
`therapy in the treatment of splenic
`enlargement and menorrhagia. In 1661
`SYDENHAM described the striking bene(cid:173)
`fit of iron therapy in the treatment of
`chlorosis. LIEBIG, in 1843, gave the
`first clear description of the role of
`haemolgobin, and FoR TES and THIVOLLE,
`in 1925, first demonstrated that plasma(cid:173)
`iron is different from haemoglobin.
`These and related findings demonstrated
`beyond argument that iron is an essen(cid:173)
`tial ingredient of the human diet. ·
`FIGUEROA'S (1958) view that "The
`great majority of patients suffering from
`iron deficiency can be treated with oral
`iron" is probably widely acceptable,
`especially if the word "iron" is inter(cid:173)
`preted as "bivalent organic
`iron"
`(UNDRITZ, 1958). The valid indications
`for parenteral iron therapy in the very
`few patients who require it include,
`according to FIGUEROA (1958): -
`1. Where there is a failure to absorb
`adequate amounts of oral iron.
`
`2. Where a patient cannot tolerate
`orally administered iron, or is unwilling
`or cannot be relied upon to continue
`oral iron therapy.
`3. Where it i_s necessary to replace
`iron stores in cases of severe, predictable
`and frequent blood loss not amenable to
`medical or surgical correction.
`4. Cases of iron-deficiency anaemia
`that have failed to respond to prolonged
`adequate oral iron therapy.
`
`Of these indications the first is rare,
`except in patients with idiopathic stea(cid:173)
`torrhoea, or who have undergone exten(cid:173)
`sive surgical removal of the small
`intestine, and the second is the most
`common. Referring to the use of paren(cid:173)
`teral iron therapy during the third
`trimester of pregnancy, FIGUEROA (1958)
`comments that it is debatable whether
`the small or moderate increase in haemo(cid:173)
`globin more readily achievable by the
`parenteral administration than by the
`oral administration of iron is justified.
`
`Iron macromolecular complexes suitabie
`for parenteral administration.
`1. Saccharated iron-oxide (Ferrive(cid:173)
`nin, Proferrin, Colliron, Neo-Ferrum,
`Iviron). -
`For intravenous injection
`only.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 1
`
`

`

`106
`
`F. J.C. RoE :
`
`2. Iron-dextrin (Dextriferron, Astra-
`injection
`intravenous
`For
`fer).
`only.
`3. Iron-dextran complex (Imferon).
`- For intramuscular or intravenous in(cid:173)
`jection.
`4. Iron-sorbitol-citric-acid complex
`For intramuscular injec(cid:173)
`(Jectofer). -
`tion only.
`5. Iron-polyisomaltose (Ferrum Haus(cid:173)
`For intramuscular injection
`mann). -
`only.
`
`If given in adequate and equivalent
`amounts these preparations are more or
`less equally effective in the treatment of
`iron-deficiency anaemia (FIGUEROA, 1958)
`This is at first sight surprising since
`there are marked differences in the
`degree of retention of iron at the in(cid:173)
`iron(cid:173)
`jection site (FIELDING, 1962):
`dextrin and iron-dextran are both re(cid:173)
`tained locally to a far greater extent than
`iron-sorbitol-citric-acid complex. How(cid:173)
`ever, these differences refer to conditions
`in which animals are overloaded with
`iron. In the absence of overloading the
`somewhat more rapid clearance of the
`iron-sorbitol complex is, from the point
`of view of rapidity of haematological
`response, apparently offset by the more
`rapid excretion of its iron-content by the
`.ANDERSSON,
`(LINDVALL and
`kidneys
`1961).
`
`than carcino(cid:173)
`General toxicity, other
`genicity, of parenteral iron preparations.
`The toxic effects, other than carcino(cid:173)
`genicity, of saccharated iron oxide are
`discussed by NISSIM (1954) and BROWN
`and MooRE (1956). The material is
`strongly alkaline and hypertonic and
`gives rise to marked local inflammation
`if injected extravascularly. Both imme(cid:173)
`diate and delayed systemic toxic effects
`are also frequent; the former are thought
`
`to be due to individual hypersensitivity
`to impurities in the preparation, and the
`latter to the intravascular precipitation
`of the compound. The incidence of
`reactions has varied with the technique
`of administration from less than 0.2%
`to over 50% of injections. Intravenous
`iron-dextrin also gives rise to a range
`of toxic reactions, especially in patients
`simultaneously receiving oral iron (BLA(cid:173)
`ZER and DEL RrnGo, 1962). From the
`point of view of the incidence and se(cid:173)
`verity of such toxic reactions the intro(cid:173)
`duction of iron-dextran for intramuscu(cid:173)
`lar use was a big step forward (Scarr
`and GovAN, 1954). Intramuscular in(cid:173)
`jection of iron-sorbitol-citric acid com(cid:173)
`plex (Jectofer) undoubtedly carries more
`risk of toxic response than does similar
`(SCOTT,
`iron-dextran
`treatment with
`1962), and the simultaneous administra(cid:173)
`tion of iron orally seems to enhance this
`risk. Iron-polyisomaltose is similar to
`iron-dextran both chemically and in its
`relative lack of toxicity (MEREu and
`ToNz, 1961).
`HADDOW and HORNING (1960) des(cid:173)
`cribed the failure of hair to regrow after
`clipping over the site of injection of
`iron-dextran, and BAKER, GOLBERG,
`MARTIN and SMITH (1961) and FIEL(cid:173)
`DING (1962) reported the development
`of alopecia, brown staining and loss of
`tissue elasticity at the site of injection of
`iron-dextran, but not of iron-sorbitol(cid:173)
`citric-acid complex. BERESFORD, GOL(cid:173)
`BERG and SMITH (1957) reported acute
`inflammation and degeneration follo(cid:173)
`wed by rapid and complete regeneration
`following the intramuscular injection of
`iron-polysaccharide complexes of the
`iron-dextrin/iron-dextran type. ROE and
`HADDOW (1965) found that acute tender(cid:173)
`ness and swelling at the injection site
`was more marked in rats injected with
`iron-sorbitol-citric acid complex than
`with iron-dextran.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 2
`
`

`

`nsitivity
`and the
`ipitation
`ence of
`:<::he.ique
`m 0.2%
`·avenous
`a range
`patients
`>n (BLA(cid:173)
`rom the
`and se-
`1e intro(cid:173)
`·amuscu(cid:173)
`l (SCOTI'
`:ular in(cid:173)
`:id com(cid:173)
`ies more
`s similar
`(ScoTI',
`ninistra(cid:173)
`;mce this
`milar to
`1d in its
`IBU and
`
`160) des(cid:173)
`:ow after
`ction of
`rOLBERG,
`1d FIEL(cid:173)
`:lopment
`:l loss of
`ection of
`sorbitol(cid:173)
`o, GoL(cid:173)
`ed acute
`n follo(cid:173)
`:neration
`~ction of
`of the
`RoE and
`e tender(cid:173)
`tion site
`ted with
`lex than
`
`On Potential Carcinogenecity of the Iron Macromolecular Complexes
`
`107
`
`Induction of neoplasms at site of intra(cid:173)
`muscular or subcutaneous i,yection of iron
`preparations
`Reports of the induction of sarcomas
`and histocytomas at the site of sub(cid:173)
`cutaneous
`intramuscular
`injection of
`various iron-carbohydrate complexes is
`summarised in Table I. The repeated
`injection of relatively large doses of
`
`(1961) obtained a low yield of tumours
`in both rats and mice following repeated
`injections ofiron-polyisomaltose (Ferrum
`Hausmann). MEREU and ToNZ (1961)
`referred to negative results in animal
`tests for carcinogenicity of this product
`but gave no details.
`In most of the experimental studies
`control animals have been injected with
`
`Table I. Carcinogenicity of' variou.r iron preparations administered f?y subcutaneous or intramuscular i,ifection
`
`Preparation
`
`Saccharated
`iron-oxide
`
`Iron-dextrin
`
`Iron--dextran
`
`No. of
`tests for
`Carcino(cid:173)
`genicity
`
`No.of
`tests in
`which
`positive
`results
`obtained
`
`3
`
`3
`
`19
`
`2
`
`3
`
`17
`
`Iron sorbitol citric
`acid complex
`Iron polyisomaltose
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1*
`
`2
`
`* Solitary benign fibroma among 20 rats.
`
`Species
`
`References
`
`Mouse
`
`Rat
`Mouse
`Rat
`Mouse
`Hamster
`Rabbit
`
`Rat
`Mouse
`Rat
`Mouse
`
`RICHMOND (1959); HADDOW and
`HORNING (1960); HADDOW, Dmrns
`and MITCHLEY (1961)
`LUNDIN (1961); FIELDING (1962)
`
`RICHMOND (1959); HADDOW and
`HORNING (1960); GOLBERG, MARTIN
`and SMITH (1960); LUNDIN (1961);
`FIELDING (1962); KUNZ, SHAHAB,
`HENZE and HEINZE (1963); HADDOW
`RoE and MITCHLEY (1964); H ADDOW
`and RoE (1964); RoE, HADDOW,
`DUKES and MITCHLEY (1964); RoE
`and HADDOW (1965) ·
`LUNDIN (1961); FIELDING (1962);
`RoE and HADDOW (1965)
`HADDOW, DuKEs and MITCHLEY
`(1961)
`
`saccharated iron-oxide, iron-dextrin or
`iron-dextran may induce such tumours
`in laboratory rodents: in many tests for
`carcinogenicity sarcomas have been in(cid:173)
`duced in upwards of 50 per cent of
`animals injected with these substances.
`Iron-sorbitol-citric-acid complex (Jec(cid:173)
`tofer), on the other hand, has given an
`essentially negative result in 3 fairly
`stringent tests (LUNDIN, 1961; FIEL(cid:173)
`DING, 1962 and RoE and HADDOW,
`1965). HADDOW, DUKES and MITCHLEY
`
`the corresponding carbohydrate moiety
`of iron-carbohydrate complex under
`test. Almost without exception entirely
`negative results have been obtained in
`such control groups. A ·problem here is
`that the carbohydrate by itself has a
`much smaller molecular size ( ca. 2,500)
`than the iron-macromolecular complex
`which it forms with iron (ca. 180,000 -
`see ERIKSSON, 1961). HUEPER (1959),
`however, tested 11 different dextrans
`ranging
`in molecular weight from
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 3
`
`

`

`108
`
`F. J.C. RoE:
`
`37,000 to several million in rats, mice
`and rabbits: injection-site sarcomas were
`induced by none of these materials.
`
`Sarcoma-induction in relation to amount
`i,yected at one site
`RoE, HADDOW, DUKES and MITCH(cid:173)
`LEY (1964) compared the effect of giving
`24 weekly injections of 0.5 ml iron(cid:173)
`dextran into one, two, four or six sub(cid:173)
`cutaneous sites in comparable groups of
`
`seen in animals injected in 4 or 6 sites
`tended to be more benign than that
`seen in animals injected in only 1 or 2
`sites. A further interesting observation
`was that multiple tumours were fre(cid:173)
`quently seen at individual injection sites.
`
`Carcinogenicity in relation to iron-over(cid:173)
`loading
`GOLBERG, MARTIN and SMITH (1960)
`studied the effects of overloading animals
`
`Table II. Incidence and time of induction of rapid/y growing tumour, ( RGT) at the injection rite
`
`No. of rats
`
`Injection sites
`per rat
`
`RGT
`
`Time of appearance Average time of
`appearance of RGT
`of first RGT
`
`24
`24
`24
`24
`32
`
`1
`2
`4
`6
`0
`
`14
`6
`9
`3
`0
`
`329
`460
`449
`522
`
`501
`667
`706
`674
`
`Table III. Riik of tumour developing at injection rite
`
`Injection
`sites
`per rat
`
`Sites
`Dose of
`iron-dextran examined
`at autopsy
`per site
`
`Sites with
`malignant
`tumours
`
`(per cent)
`
`(per cent)
`
`Sites with
`benign or
`malignant
`tumours
`
`1
`2
`4
`6
`
`12 ml.
`6 ml.
`4 ml.
`2ml.
`
`22
`46
`96
`138
`
`14
`9
`20
`12
`
`(63.6)
`(19.6)
`(20.8)
`(8.7)
`
`14
`11
`29
`17
`
`(63.6)
`(23.9)
`(30.2)
`(12.3)
`
`rats. A spectrum of local tumours was
`including benign fibromas,
`induced,
`small, slowly growing sarcomas and
`rapidly growing sarcomas. Table II shows
`that the incidence of rapidly growing
`latent
`tumours fell and the average
`interval before they appeared rose as
`the number of injection-sites used in(cid:173)
`that,
`creased. Table III demonstrates
`although the risk of tumour develop(cid:173)
`ment at any one site fell as the number
`of injection-sites increased, the risk that
`the animal would develop a tumour at
`one of its injection-sites actually in(cid:173)
`creased I However, the type of tumour
`
`with iron. Their results indicated that
`the escape of iron from the site of in(cid:173)
`jection was much slower in iron-over(cid:173)
`loaded animals than in normal animals.
`In addition, biochemical changes in the
`liver, serum and region of injection
`were observed in the former but not in
`the latter. Finally they asserted that
`local tumour induction only occurs in
`iron-overloaded animals. They saw, for
`example, no sarcomas in response to
`weekly intramuscular injections of0.02ml
`iron-dextran in mice and only one sar(cid:173)
`coma in 50 mice injected once weekly
`with 0.1 ml. However, in the latter case
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 4
`
`

`

`>r 6 sites
`han that
`.y 1 or 2
`servation
`v~r~ fre(cid:173)
`:ion sites.
`
`iron-over-
`
`~H (1960)
`~ animals
`
`·on site
`
`1e of
`ofRGT
`
`!r cent)
`
`i.6)
`i.9)
`1.2)
`!.3)
`
`tted that
`te of in(cid:173)
`·on-over-
`animals.
`es in the
`injection
`ut not in
`ted that
`1ccurs in
`saw, for
`>onse to
`)f0.02ml
`one sar(cid:173)
`! weekly
`Ltter case
`
`On Potential Carcinogenecity of the Iron Macromolecular Complexes
`
`109
`
`survival was poor. More recently HAD(cid:173)
`DOW and RoE (1964) reported a high
`incidence of sarcomas in mice receiving
`0.05 ml iron-dextran weekly (total dose
`2.35 mls) and one out of 20 rats given
`90 weekly injections of 0.01 mls deve(cid:173)
`loped a sarcoma (Table IV, V). In a
`current experiment sarcomas have appe(cid:173)
`ared in response to only 2 injections,
`each of 0.75 ml iron-dextran (see Ta(cid:173)
`ble VI).
`
`Clearly the risk of tumour in(cid:173)
`duction recedes as the size of the local
`dose is reduced, but particularly in the
`light of the results just referred to it is
`by no means certain that the degree of
`general overloading with iron is of
`any significance.
`
`The relationship of dose to body size
`HADDOW and HORNING (1960) and
`RoE (1961) have argued cogently that
`
`Table IV. Carcinogenic response to different doses of iron-dextran (imferon) injected subcutaneously in CB
`er rats (Wistar)
`
`Total dose
`
`Injection site
`sarcomas
`
`No. of rats
`injected
`
`Minimum
`induction time
`(days)
`
`No. of doses
`
`(Imferon)
`
`Size of each
`dose
`(ml.)
`
`30
`20
`64
`90
`
`1.0
`0.5
`0.05
`O.Dl
`
`(ml.)
`
`30
`10
`3.2
`0.9
`
`20
`8
`2
`1
`
`30*
`20
`20
`20
`
`145
`426
`478
`736
`
`* A further 8 rats had local histiocytomas.
`
`Table V. Carcinogenic response lo different doses of iron-dextran ( I mferon) injected .rubcutaneou.r{y in CB
`er mice (Stock)
`
`No. of doses
`
`(Imferon)
`
`Size of each
`dose
`(ml.)
`
`30
`47
`87
`
`0.3
`0.05
`0.01
`
`Total dose
`
`Injection site No. of rats
`sarcomas
`injected
`
`(ml.)
`
`9.0
`2.35
`0.87
`
`14
`12
`0
`
`30
`30
`20
`
`Minimum
`induction time
`(days)
`
`182
`168
`
`Table VI. Effect of do.re in induction of sarcomas at the site of injection of iron-dextran
`
`Group No. of S.C.
`injc,ctions of
`0.75 ml. iron-
`dextran into
`R. flank
`
`Total dose
`of iron-
`dextran
`
`No. of
`rats in
`group
`
`Position 16 months after
`start of experiment
`
`Survivors
`
`Injection site Time of
`sarcomas*
`appearance
`of sarcomas
`(months)
`
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`
`16
`8
`4
`2
`0
`
`12ml.
`6ml.
`3ml.
`1.5 ml.
`0
`
`16
`32
`64
`128
`64
`
`3
`17
`29
`71
`33
`
`5
`2
`0**
`3
`0
`
`12, 14, 14, 14,16
`9, 15
`
`13, 14, 14
`
`* All histologically confirmed.
`** One benign fibroma.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 5
`
`

`

`110
`
`F. J.C. RoE:
`
`the induction of sarcomas at the site of
`injection is a "local" phenomenon.
`Therefore, it is the actual size of the
`dose and not its size relative to whole
`body size which matters. The size of
`individual cells in man is of the same
`order as in experimental animals and a
`particular volume of injected material
`will come into contact with approxi(cid:173)
`mately the same number of cells in all
`species. Thus the ratio of dose to body
`weight is only of importance if it can
`be shown that the local induction of
`sarcomas by the injected material is
`dependent on a general dose-dependent
`effect on the body as a whole. So far this
`has not been demonstrated.
`
`Evidence for carcinogenicity other than
`local!J at the site of injection
`HuEPER (1957, 1959) examined a
`wide variety of macromolecular sub(cid:173)
`stances for carcinogenicity, administe(cid:173)
`ring them intravenously, subcutaneously
`(by injection or implantation), or intra(cid:173)
`peritoneally to rats, mice or rabbits.
`Only one of 30 substances examined,
`silastic rubber (a silicone polymer), gave
`unequivocal evidence of tumour in(cid:173)
`duction at the site of subcutaneous im(cid:173)
`plantation. On the other hand, many of
`the test substances appeared to increase
`the incidence of tumours of the reticulo(cid:173)
`endothelial system. These findings of
`HuEPER and the observations of HAD(cid:173)
`DOW, DuKES and MrTCHLEY (1961) that
`simple iron salts, such as ferric citrate,
`ferric salicylate, ferrous sulphate, ferrous
`lactate or ferrous gluconate, do not in(cid:173)
`duce injection-site sarcomas, suggest
`that the local carcinogenicity of iron(cid:173)
`macromolecular complexes is attribut(cid:173)
`able neither to the carbohydrate alone,
`nor to the iron alone, but to the com(cid:173)
`plexes themselves. On the other hand,
`the fact that a variety of macromolecules
`seem able to induce cancer of the reti-
`
`culo-endothelial system, suggests that
`there may be a hazard of distant carcino(cid:173)
`genesis, (i.e. the induction of tumours at
`sites distant from the point of injection)
`following the parenteral administration
`of iron-carbohydrate complexes also.
`Most of the tests of iron-carbo(cid:173)
`hydrate complexes for carcinogenicity
`have been designed specifically to study
`the induction of tumours locally at the
`site of injection. For such purposes a
`control group containing the same num(cid:173)
`ber of animals as the test group is appro(cid:173)
`priate. Much larger control groups are
`likely to be necessary for studying the
`effect of treatment on the incidence of
`tumours of all sites and tissues of the
`body. HADDOW and HORNING (1960)
`observed a number of unusual tumours
`in their iron-dextran treated animals,
`including a bronchogenic carcinoma in
`a rat. HADDOW (1963), from a survey of
`his many experiments with iron-dex(cid:173)
`tran, regarded the yield of tumours at
`sites remote from the injection-site as
`"unquestionably significant". But LUN(cid:173)
`DIN (1961) commented on the absence
`of liver tumours in his iron-dextran
`treated animals, despite the large de(cid:173)
`posits of iron in the organ, and RoE and
`LANCASTER (1964) felt that more infor(cid:173)
`mation was necessary before such a
`reached. ROE,
`conclusion could be
`HADDOW, DUKES and MrTCHLEY (1964)
`recorded
`the occurrence of various
`types of tumour in both iron-dextran
`treated rats and in untreated control
`groups. More recently, RoE and HAD(cid:173)
`DOW (1965) observed more
`'distant'
`tumours of various types in rats in(cid:173)
`jected repeatedly with
`iron-sorbitol(cid:173)
`citric-acid than with iron-dextran in
`similar dosage. LANGVAD (1964) repor(cid:173)
`ted an experiment in which 50 male and
`50 female mice of the St/El A strain were
`injected repeatedly with iron-dextran,
`each animal receiving a total of 2 mls
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 6
`
`

`

`,ts that
`· carcino-
`1ours at
`tjection)
`.stration
`1lso.
`1-carbo-
`genicity
`:o study
`y at the
`poses a
`1e num-
`, appro-
`,ups are
`fog the
`lence of
`, of the
`(1960)
`:umours
`1nimals,
`1oma in
`1rvey of
`·on-dex-
`tours at
`1-site as
`ut LuN-
`absence
`-dextran
`rge de-
`~.OE and
`e infor-
`such a
`RoE,
`r (1964)
`various
`-dextran
`control
`d HAD-
`distant'
`rats in-
`orbitol-
`tran in
`) repor-
`1ale and
`Lin were
`:lextran,
`,f 2 mls
`
`. l
`
`:I
`iJ
`ji
`
`On Potential Carcinogenecity of the Iron Macromolecular Complexes
`
`111
`
`of the substance. Seven per cent of the
`males and 58 % of the females developed
`tumours. The corresponding rates for
`untreated controls were O % and 20 % ,
`respectively. LANGVAD (1964) suggested
`that oncogenic viruses used in other
`experiments in the same laboratory at
`the time might, through contamination,
`have been wholly or partly responsible
`for the differences recorded. However,
`even if it were shown that iron-dextran
`acts as no more than a co-factor in the
`induction of tumours of distant sites,
`its use is hardly to be regarded as being
`without potential carcinogenic hazard
`for man.
`Obviously the problem cannot be
`resolved until the results of careful
`studies on much larger groups of animals
`are available.
`
`Evidence of carcinogenic effect of iron
`macromolecular complexes in man
`To date there has, to our knowledge,
`been no fully acceptable report of the
`occurrence of sarcoma at the site of
`injection of iron-macromolecular com(cid:173)
`plexes in man. CROWLEY and STILL (1960)
`reported the occurrence of a metastasis
`in the buttock at the site of previous
`iron-dextran injections in a case of
`cancer of the cervix uteri. ROBINSON,
`BELL and STURDY (1960) reported a case
`in which an undifferentiated soft-tissue
`sarcoma arose at the site of injection of
`iron dextran into the region of the
`deltoid muscle 3¼ years previously.
`Excess iron was present at the tumour
`site, though it was not proved to be
`iron-dextran. It was thought unlikely
`that the tumour was a metastasis, but the
`possibility could not be excluded. GOL(cid:173)
`BERG (1960) subsequently quoted the
`opinion of Professor R. A. WILLIS that
`the lesion observed by ROBINSON and
`his colleagues was not a neoplasm.
`Where there is a difference in opinion
`
`between pathologists on
`the histo(cid:173)
`pathological nature of a lesion, it is
`logical to take into account the macro(cid:173)
`scopic appearances and clinical details.
`The case history provided by ROBINSON
`and his colleagues is more in keeping
`with neoplasia than with any alternative
`diagnosis.
`In any event, as pointed out by
`many authors, the induction of sarcomas
`in man by injected iron complexes, if
`it occurs at all, is likely to take many
`years. It is still less than 20 years since
`use of this type of iron preparation
`became widespread, so that there re(cid:173)
`mains the possibility that the minimum
`induction period for man has not yet
`been exhausted.
`If the main carcinogenic effect in
`man is a local one, then it is likely that
`it will be observed sooner rather than
`later, since localised soft-tissue sarcomas
`are relatively uncommon. If, however,
`the main danger is a slightly increased
`risk of cancer of many different sites, then
`nothing short of a major long-term
`prospective epidemiological survey is
`likely to reveal the hazard.
`BAKER, GOLBERG, MARTIN and SMITH
`(1961) were interested in establishing
`the carcinogenic safety of iron-dextran
`for man. With this intention, they com(cid:173)
`pared the local tissue response to in(cid:173)
`jection in different species. Rabbits and
`dogs showed less residual iron at the
`injection-site, and a greater hepatic
`uptake of iron than mice and rats.
`Nevertheless, HADDOW, RoE
`and
`MITCHLEY (1964) encountered two cases
`oflocal sarcoma in 6 rabbits injected with
`iron-dextran. Most of the specimens ob(cid:173)
`tained by BAKER etal (1961) from iron(cid:173)
`dextran injection-sites in man showed
`no evidence of fibrosis, but in 2 cases
`fibrosis and the heavy accumulation of
`siderophages were seen. These are
`precisely the changes which precede
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 7
`
`

`

`112
`
`F. J.C. ROE:
`
`tumour formation in experimental ani(cid:173)
`mals.
`
`Is iron, per se, carcinogenic?
`There is no evidence that iron as
`such is carcinogenic, though it is doubt(cid:173)
`ful whether it has been deliberately
`tested for carcinogenicity to an adequate
`extent. There have been no reports of
`incidence of cancer in
`an excessive
`animals deliberately overloaded with
`iron compounds, and with
`simple
`possibly one exception, referred to above
`(see LANGVAD, 1964), the carcinogenic
`effect of iron-macromolecular complexes
`appears to be limited to the site of its
`injection into the body. Overloading
`with iron leads to its excessive storage
`in the liver, i.e. 'haemochromatosis '. In
`this condition the iron is stored as an
`organic complex, for which GOLBERG
`and SMITH (1960) suggested the name
`"haptosiderin ". These workers also sug(cid:173)
`that where haemochromatosis
`gested
`arises spontaneously, it does so as an
`expression of an inborn error of meta(cid:173)
`bolism involving the overproduction of
`haptosiderin. In induced haemochroma(cid:173)
`tosis, on the other hand, the excess of
`haptosiderin is secondary to overloa(cid:173)
`to
`tends
`ding with iron. Cirrhosis
`accompany both spontaneous and in(cid:173)
`duced haemochromatosis, but according
`to GOLBERG and SMITH adequate pro(cid:173)
`tein and vitamin E in the diet delay or
`prevent its occurrence. Although in
`general there is undoubtedly an associa(cid:173)
`tion between cirrhosis and liver cancer,
`in the particular case of the cirrhosis
`which accompanies haemochromatosis
`the association is very weak (SHELDON,
`1935; WILLIS, 1953). FouLDs and STE(cid:173)
`WART (1956) and HuEPER (1956) both
`observed a high incidence of bronchial
`carcinoma in haematite miners, and
`concluded that sidero-silicosis predis(cid:173)
`posed to neoplasia. DOLL (19 58) did
`
`not regard the evidence for the associa(cid:173)
`tion as conclusive, but CAMPBELL (1940)
`reported a higher incidence of adeno(cid:173)
`matous lung tumours in mice exposed to
`mixtures of silica and iron oxide than in
`untreated controls.
`
`The mechanism of carcinogenesis by iron
`macromolecular complexes
`There has been much speculation
`with regard to the mechanism of carci(cid:173)
`nogenesis by macromolecular materials
`in general and by iron-carbohydrate
`complexes in particular. As pointed out
`above, the induction of local tumours
`cannot be attributed solely either to the
`iron or to the carbohydrate moiety of
`the various molecules. Carcinogenicity
`is somehow linked to the nature of the
`complex itself. In this connection it is
`that aluminium(cid:173)
`interest
`of special
`dextran is also highly productive of
`local sarcomas on injection: HADDOW,
`DuKES and MITCHLEY (1961) recorded
`the induction of 11 sarcomas in 40 mice
`given repeated subcutaneous injections
`of this complex. Preparations of chro(cid:173)
`mium-dextran, copper-dextran and bis(cid:173)
`muth-dextran, on the other hand, were
`more or less inactive. The macromole(cid:173)
`cular compounds studied by HuEPER
`(1959) were largely ineffective in the
`induction of local tumours. Hence mac(cid:173)
`romolecularity itself is not a sufficient
`explanation of carcinogenicity.
`HADDOW and HORNING (1960) sug(cid:173)
`gested that blockage of the reticulo(cid:173)
`endothelial system with, perhaps, inter(cid:173)
`ference with immune processes might
`be implicated. FIELDING (1962) saw
`evidence of lymphatic blockage after
`the injection of iron-dextran or iron(cid:173)
`dextrin, but not after injection of iron(cid:173)
`(1959)
`sorbitol-citric-acid. RICHMOND
`suggested that the carbohydrate com(cid:173)
`plex might enable the passage of iron
`across intracellular membranes normally
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 8
`
`

`

`the associa(cid:173)
`·BELL (1940)
`: of adeno(cid:173)
`:-e:i.posed to
`cide than in
`
`nesis by iron
`
`speculation
`;m of carci-
`1r materials
`1rbohydrate
`:>ointed out
`:al tumours
`ither to the
`moiety of
`:inogenicity
`iture of the
`ection it is
`aluminium(cid:173)
`,ductive of
`HADDOW,
`'.) recorded
`in 40 mice
`; injections
`1s of chro(cid:173)
`.n and bis(cid:173)
`hand, were
`nacromole(cid:173)
`,y HuEPER
`ive in the
`-Ience mac-
`1 sufficient
`'{,
`)960) sug(cid:173)
`e reticulo-
`1aps, inter(cid:173)
`sses might
`1962) saw
`kage after
`:1 or iron(cid:173)
`>n of iron(cid:173)
`(1959)
`-.D
`irate com(cid:173)
`ge of iron
`:s normally
`
`On Potential Carcinogenecity of the Iron Macromolecular Complexes
`
`113
`
`impervious
`to
`it. He subsequently
`(RICHMOND, 1962) showed that iron(cid:173)
`dextran gives rise to cytological changes
`indicative of intracellular oxidation. He
`thought that the changes were not
`dissimilar from some of the effects of
`ionising radiation, and suggested that
`they could explain the carcinogenicity of
`iron-dextran. TURNER (1964) reported
`that the response of fowl fibrocytes
`grown in vitro, to iron-dextran, resem(cid:173)
`bled that to known carcinogens. HAD(cid:173)
`DOW and HORNING (1960) reviewed the
`literature concerning the interference
`with iron metabolism by carcinogenic
`agents, but came to no real conclusion
`with regard to the likely mechanism of
`action of iron-complexes.
`It is, perhaps, tempting to regard
`carcinogenesis by iron-carbohydrate com(cid:173)
`plexes as being related to carcinogenesis
`by other metals, e.g. arsenic, beryllium,
`cadmium, chromium, cobalt lead and
`nickel (see RoE and LANCASTER, 1964).
`However, on present evidence it would
`certainly be unwise to presume that this
`is so. In the cases of all the other metals
`the evidence strongly suggests that the
`metal itself is implicated. But in the
`case of iron, the only acceptable evi(cid:173)
`dence of carcinogenicity relates to iron(cid:173)
`carbohydrate complexes and, possibly,
`combinations of iron with silica. Alumi(cid:173)
`nium alone behaves in a similar fashion.
`RoE and LANCASTER (1964) suggested
`that the induction of cancer by the sub(cid:173)
`cutaneous injection of chemically un(cid:173)
`reacti ve materials such as
`the iron
`macromolecular complexes may be more
`akin to the " Oppenheimer effect" than
`to chemical carcinogenesis. On the other
`hand, HuEPER (1959) contended that
`chemical mechanisms have not been
`excluded in the case of sarcoma induc(cid:173)
`tion by the implantation of plastic mate(cid:173)
`rials. Moreover, as RoE and LANCASTER
`(1964) themselves pointed out, by no me-
`
`8 Potential Carcinogenic Hazards
`
`ans all chemically unreactive substances,
`even those which remain permanently
`at the injection-site, induce sarcomas.
`The consideration of the mechanism
`of carcinogenesis by iron-carbohydrate
`complexes should, perhaps, begin with
`a description of the changes which
`precede the appearance of tumours. On
`this subject there is general agreement
`that the first change is the uptake of the
`injected material by histiocytes (sidero(cid:173)
`phages). In these cells the iron is there(cid:173)
`after stored as newly formed ferritin
`(MuIR and GOLBERG, 1961). Sidero(cid:173)
`phages are also found in the local
`lymph nodes, and other cells of the
`reticulo-endothelial system, generally,
`take up and store the iron as ferritin.
`However, the movement of iron away
`from the injection site, certainly in
`animals overloaded with iron, is slow
`(BAKER, GOLBERG, MARTIN and SMITH,
`1961) and both siderophages and extra(cid:173)
`cellular iron-containing material per(cid:173)
`sists locally until tumour development
`ensues. The development of a mass of
`siderophages clearly depends on the
`proliferation of histiocytes and in some
`instances this proliferation leads to the
`formation of a histiocytic neoplasm
`(histiocytoma) in which many of the
`cells are not laden with iron. After a
`period of some months, depending on
`the species, proliferation of histiocytes
`gives place to fibroblastic activity. It is
`not certain whether fibroblasts are deri(cid:173)
`ved from siderophages or merely sti(cid:173)
`mulated to divide by the presence of the
`siderophages. The onset of fibroplasia
`is appreciable, clinically, in that the
`injection site becomes firm and thicke(cid:173)
`ned. Such areas of thickening remain un(cid:173)
`changed or enlarge slowly over a period
`of several months. Suddenly, usually it
`seems from one edge of the thickened
`lesion, a rapidly growing nodule appears.
`The growth of this lesion is progressive
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1075 - Page 9
`
`

`

`114
`
`F. J.C. ROE:
`
`and necessitates
`the sacrifice of the
`animal within a matter of days or weeks
`from the time it first became palpable.
`The stage of fibroblastic prolifera(cid:173)
`tion appears to be an essential prelimi(cid:173)
`nary in the induction of sarcomas. This
`is true not only of their induction by
`iron-macromolecular complexes but by
`all agents, including implanted sponge

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket