throbber
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199 – 211
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/ytaap
`
`Review
`
`Iron metabolism and toxicity
`
`G. Papanikolaoua, K. Pantopoulosb,c,*
`
`aFirst Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
`bLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2
`cDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Canada
`
`Received 19 April 2004; accepted 24 June 2004
`Available online 11 August 2004
`
`Abstract
`
`Iron is an essential nutrient with limited bioavailability. When present in excess, iron poses a threat to cells and tissues, and therefore iron
`homeostasis has to be tightly controlled. Iron’s toxicity is largely based on its ability to catalyze the generation of radicals, which attack and
`damage cellular macromolecules and promote cell death and tissue injury. This is lucidly illustrated in diseases of iron overload, such as
`hereditary hemochromatosis or transfusional siderosis, where excessive iron accumulation results in tissue damage and organ failure.
`Pathological iron accumulation in the liver has also been linked to the development of hepatocellular cancer. Here we provide a background
`on the biology and toxicity of iron and the basic concepts of iron homeostasis at the cellular and systemic level. In addition, we provide an
`overview of the various disorders of iron overload, which are directly linked to iron’s toxicity. Finally, we discuss the potential role of iron in
`malignant transformation and cancer.
`D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Iron; Toxicity; Homeostasis; Heme
`
`Chemical properties and biological functions of iron
`
`Heme
`
`Iron is a component of several metaloproteins and plays a
`crucial role in vital biochemical activities, such as oxygen
`sensing and transport, electron transfer, and catalysis (Aisen
`et al., 2001). Iron is thus indispensable for
`life. The
`biological functions of iron are based on its chemical
`properties, e.g., its capacity to form a variety of coordination
`complexes with organic ligands in a dynamic and flexible
`mode, and its favorable redox potential to switch between
`the ferrous, Fe(II), and ferric, Fe(III), states (+772 mV at
`neutral pH). The bioavailability of iron is generally limited,
`because under aerobic conditions, Fe(II) is readily oxidized
`in solution to Fe(III), which is virtually insoluble at
`18 M].
`physiological pH [Kfree Fe(III) = 10
`
`* Corresponding author. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir
`Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine
`Road, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2. Fax: +1 514 340 7502.
`E-mail address: kostas.pantopoulos@mcgill.ca (K. Pantopoulos).
`
`0041-008X/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.021
`
`A significant fraction of cellular iron is associated with
`proteins in the form of heme, a common prosthetic group
`composed of protoporphyrin IX and a Fe(II) ion. The
`tetrapyrrol porphyrin ring is synthesized from the universal
`precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) by a series of
`reactions in the cytosol and in mitochondria. In metazoans,
`ALA is generated by the condensation of glycine and
`succinyl-CoA, which is catalyzed by the 5-aminolevulinic
`acid synthase (ALAS) (Ryter and Tyrrell, 2000). Mammals
`express two ALAS isoforms: a housekeeping (ALAS1)
`isoform and an erythroid-specific (ALAS2) isoform (Ponka,
`1997). The insertion of Fe(II) into protoporphyrin IX,
`catalyzed by ferrochelatase in the mitochondria, defines
`the terminal step of the heme biosynthetic pathway. Heme is
`then exported to the cytosol for incorporation into hemo-
`proteins. Heme degradation is catalyzed by the microsomal
`heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and its homologues HO-2 and
`HO-3 (Ryter and Tyrrell, 2000). The liberated Fe(II) is
`reutilized. The reaction also generates carbon monoxide
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 1
`
`

`

`200
`
`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`compatible with the constrains of the cellular environment,
`is a fundamental feature for many biochemical reactions and
`renders iron to an essential mineral and nutrient. However,
`this very property turns iron into a potential biohazard,
`because under aerobic conditions, iron can readily catalyze
`the generation of noxious radicals. Iron’s toxicity is largely
`based on Fenton and Haber–Weiss chemistry (Fig. 1A),
`where catalytic amounts of iron are sufficient
`to yield
`S
`S
`) and hydro-
`) from superoxide (O2
`hydroxyl radicals (OH
`gen peroxide (H2O2), collectively known as breactive
`oxygen intermediatesQ (ROIs) (Halliwell and Gutteridge,
`1990). Importantly, ROIs are inevitable byproducts of
`aerobic respiration and emerge by incomplete reduction of
`dioxygen in mitochondria. ROIs can also be generated
`during enzymatic reactions in other subcellular compart-
`ments, such as in peroxisomes, the endoplasmic reticulum,
`or the cytoplasm.
`ROIs are also produced by the membrane-bound
`NADPH oxidase complex (Hampton et al., 1998), a
`multisubunit enzyme primarily expressed in phagocytic
`neutrophils and macrophages, but also in other cell types.
`NADPH oxidase is an important tool for the antimicrobial
`defense of the organism. The enzyme complex assembles
`upon infection and generates high levels of superoxide in a
`brespiratory burstQ, which is enzymatically and spontane-
`ously dismutated to hydrogen peroxide. The reaction
`products give rise to more potent oxidants such as
`
`
`) and hypochlorite (OCl
`), which
`peroxynitrite (ONOO
`
`(CO), which may be involved in signaling pathways, and
`biliverdin, which is further enzymatically converted to the
`antioxidant bilirubin.
`The most abundant mammalian hemoproteins, hemoglo-
`bin and myoglobin, serve as oxygen carriers in the erythroid
`tissue and in the muscle, respectively. Oxygen binding is
`mediated by the heme moieties. Other hemoproteins include
`various cytochromes and enzymes, such as oxygenases,
`peroxidases, nitric oxide (NO) synthases, or guanylate
`cyclase. The heme moiety may also function in electron
`transfer reactions (e.g., in cytochromes a, b, and c), as a
`substrate activator (e.g., in cytochrome oxidase, cytochrome
`P450, catalase) or as an NO sensor (in guanylate cyclase).
`
`Non-heme iron
`
`The most prevalent forms of non-heme iron in metaloQ
`proteins are iron–sulfur clusters, such as 2Fe–2S, 3Fe–4S,
`or 4Fe–4S (Beinert et al., 1997). They play diverse
`functional roles, ranging from electron transfer (e.g., the
`Rieske proteins in complex III of the respiratory chain),
`transcriptional regulation (the bacterial SoxR and FNR
`transcription factors), structural stabilization (bacterial
`endonuclease III) to catalysis (e.g., aconitase, an enzyme
`of the citric acid cycle). Other forms of catalytically active,
`protein-associated iron may include iron-oxo clusters (e.g.,
`in ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme required for DNA
`synthesis) or mononuclear iron centers (e.g.,
`in cyclo-
`oxygenase and lipoxygenase, enzymes involved in inflam-
`matory responses).
`It should also be noted that non-heme iron has a central
`function in a recently discovered mechanism for oxygen
`sensing, via the hypoxia-inducible factor
`(HIF). This
`controls the transcription of a wide array of genes involved
`in erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, cell proliferation/survival,
`glycolysis, and iron metabolism in response to oxygen
`availability (Bruick, 2003). The stability of the HIF-1a
`subunit is directly regulated by oxygen. In normoxia, HIF-
`1a is degraded by the proteasome following hydroxylation
`at P402 and P564 within two functionally independent
`degradation domains. This modification is required for the
`recognition of HIF-1a by the von Hippel–Lindau protein
`(pVHL), which is a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase
`complex (Ivan et al., 2001; Jaakkola et al., 2001). The
`hydroxylation of P402 and P564 is catalyzed by HIF prolyl-
`4-hydroxylases, which are oxygen- and iron-dependent
`enzymes, members of the broader family of 2-oxogluta-
`rate-dependent oxygenases (Bruick and McKnight, 2001;
`Epstein et al., 2001). Thus, the HIF prolyl-4-hydroxylases
`essentially function as boxygen sensorsQ.
`
`Toxicity of iron
`
`The efficiency of Fe(II) as an electron donor and of
`Fe(III) as an electron acceptor, with a redox potential
`
`Fig. 1. (A) Iron-catalyzed generation of the hydroxyl radical via the Fenton
`reaction; the net Haber–Weiss reaction is also indicated. (B) Iron-catalyzed
`generation of organic radicals. (C) Heme-catalyzed generation of oxygen
`radicals via oxoferryl intermediates. (D) Direct interaction of iron with
`oxygen.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 2
`
`

`

`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`201
`
`amplify the bactericidal (and cytotoxic) capacity of phag-
`ocytic cells and constitute major toxic species in vivo
`(Ischiropoulos and Beckman, 2003). The former is gener-
`ated by the spontaneous reaction of superoxide with NO,
`while the latter is synthesized from hydrogen peroxide and
`chloride in a reaction catalyzed by myeloperoxidase.
`In this milieu, redox active iron catalyzes the generation
`of not only hydroxyl radicals, but also of organic reactive
`S
`S
`), alkoxyl (RO
`), thiyl (RS),
`species, such as peroxyl (ROO
`S
`) radicals (Fig. 1B). Interestingly,
`or thiyl-peroxyl (RSOO
`heme iron (either bfreeQ or within hemoproteins) may also
`catalyze the formation of radicals, mainly via formation of
`oxoferryl intermediates (Ryter and Tyrrell, 2000) (Fig. 1C).
`Finally, ferrous iron can also contribute as a reactant, rather
`than as a catalyst, to free radical generation by a direct
`interaction with oxygen, via ferryl (Fe2+–O) or perferryl
`(Fe2+–O2) iron intermediates (Fig. 1D). It has been proposed
`that when [O2]/[H2O2] N 100, these reactions may represent
`an important source for free radical generation in vivo
`(Huang, 2003).
`Free radicals are highly reactive species and may
`promote oxidation of proteins, peroxidation of membrane
`lipids, and modification of nucleic acids. Likewise, reactive
`nitrogen species, such as peroxynitrite, may lead to protein
`damage via nitration. An increase in the steady state levels
`of
`reactive oxygen (and nitrogen) species beyond the
`antioxidant capacity of the organism, called oxidative (and
`nitrosative) stress,
`is encountered in many pathological
`conditions, such as chronic inflammation, ischemia–reper-
`fusion injury, or neurodegeneration (Ischiropoulos and
`Beckman, 2003). Excess of redox active iron (as well as
`copper) aggravates oxidative (and nitrosative) stress and
`leads to accelerated tissue degeneration. This is evident in
`disorders of hereditary or secondary iron overload (see
`below).
`Under physiological conditions, extracellular iron is
`23 M at neutral
`exclusively bound to transferrin (Kd = 10
`pH), a monomeric glycoprotein serving as the plasma iron
`carrier, which maintains iron soluble and nontoxic, unable to
`engage in Fenton/Haber–Weiss reactions (Ponka et al.,
`1998). In healthy individuals, only 30% of circulating
`transferrin binds to iron. In pathological iron overload, iron
`gradually saturates the iron-binding capacity of transferrin
`and forms redox-active,
`low-molecular-weight chelates.
`Non-transferrin-bound iron eventually gets internalized into
`tissues by poorly defined mechanisms, resulting in cell
`damage and tissue injury.
`
`Cellular iron metabolism
`
`Iron-loaded transferrin binds to its specific receptor on
`the cell surface, the transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) (Ponka et
`al., 1998). The complex undergoes endocytosis (Cheng et
`al., 2004) and iron is released from transferrin, following
`acidification of the endosome to pH ~5.5, and transported
`
`across the endosomal membrane by the divalent metal
`transporter DMT1. Internalized iron is utilized for metabolic
`purposes (incorporation into iron-containing proteins) and
`excess is detoxified by sequestration into ferritin, an iron-
`storage protein. Ferritin is composed of 24 subunits of H-
`and L-chains that assemble into a shell-like structure
`forming a cavity that accommodates up to 4500 Fe(III)
`ions (Harrison and Arosio, 1996).
`The transferrin/TfR1 pathway defines the major route for
`cellular iron uptake and certain cell
`types (for example
`erythroid cells) completely depend on it for the acquisition
`of iron. Thus, the targeted disruption of mouse TfR1 has
`been associated with early embryonic lethality due to
`defective erythropoiesis (Levy et al., 1999). Transferrin
`receptor 2 (TfR2), a close homologue of TfR1, primarily
`expressed in hepatocytes and hematopoietic cells (Kawabata
`et al., 1999), cannot compensate for TfR1 deficiency and
`/
`mice.
`rescue the embryonic lethal phenotype of TfR1
`/
`embryos is restricted within the
`The defect
`in TfR1
`erythroid and neuronal tissue (Levy et al., 1999), suggesting
`that alternative pathways for cellular iron acquisition in
`other cell types exist.
`For example, a new pathway for the delivery of iron into
`cells via enterobactin and the neutrophil-derived protein
`neutral gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has recently
`been described (Goetz et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2002).
`Enterobactin belongs to a class of low-molecular-weight
`iron-chelating metabolites known as siderophores, which
`are synthesized by some bacteria and fungi to scavenge
`extracellular iron. It
`is not clear whether mammals can
`produce siderophores themselves, but
`the above data
`suggest that they can utilize siderophore-based mechanisms
`for iron acquisition.
`the mechanisms of intra-
`Not much is known about
`cellular iron transport to organelles, such as mitochondria.
`There is strong evidence for the existence of a transit pool
`of iron in the cytosol (Kakhlon and Cabantchik, 2002;
`Petrat et al., 2002), which presumably remains bound to
`low-molecular-weight chelates, such as citrate, ATP, AMP,
`or pyrophosphate. It
`is believed that
`the levels of this
`elusive chelatable or blabile iron poolQ (LIP) reflect the
`overall iron status of the cell. The LIP can be monitored
`in situ by fluorescent
`techniques (Kakhlon and Cabant-
`chik, 2002; Petrat et al., 2002). The employment of such
`techniques has revealed the dynamic nature of the LIP
`and uncovered that fluctuations in its levels translate into
`the onset of homeostatic responses to iron availability.
`Importantly, the LIP appears to define a source of redox-
`active iron, which significantly contributes to mechanisms
`of
`iron-mediated toxicity. Thus, expansion of
`the LIP
`upon repression of ferritin expression in human K562
`cells correlated with oxidative stress (Kakhlon et al.,
`2001). Conversely,
`the overexpression of H-ferritin in
`murine MEL cells resulted in reduction of
`the LIP
`concomitantly with the levels of ROIs (Epsztejn et al.,
`1999).
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 3
`
`

`

`202
`
`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`Regulation of cellular iron metabolism: the IRE–IRP system
`
`TfR1 and ferritin are crucial proteins for the control of
`cellular
`iron homeostasis (Hentze et al., 2004). Their
`expression is coordinately and reciprocally controlled in
`response to iron levels by a posttranscriptional mechanism,
`which involves mRNA–protein interactions (Hentze et al.,
`2004; Pantopoulos, 2004). The mRNAs encoding TfR1 (but
`not TfR2) and ferritin (both H- and L-chains) contain biron
`responsive elementsQ (IREs) in their 3V or 5V untranslated
`regions (UTRs), respectively. These are structural motifs of
`
`~30 nucleotides that fold and form a loop with a 5V-
`CAGUGN-3V consensus sequence (the underlined C and G
`interact by hydrogen bonding), and a moderately stable
`(DG c 7 kcal/mol) stem, interrupted by an unpaired C
`residue. They are evolutionary conserved in vertebrates and
`some insects and bacteria (Johansson and Theil, 2002).
`The IRE motifs provide a binding site for two biron
`regulatory proteinsQ, IRP1 and IRP2 (Fig. 2A), which are
`activated in iron-starved cells to bind with high affinity
`12 M)
`c 10
`to cognate IREs. The IRE–IRP
`(K d
`interactions stabilize the otherwise unstable TfR1 mRNA,
`
`Fig. 2. (A) Homeostatic responses to iron supply mediated by IRE–IRP interactions. Decreased iron supply activates binding of IRPs to IREs, resulting in
`stabilization of TfR1 mRNA and translational inhibition of the mRNAs encoding ferritin (H- and L-chains), erythroid-specific ALAS2, and mitochondrial
`aconitase. Conversely, IRPs do not bind to cognate IREs in iron-replete cells, permitting degradation of TfR1 mRNA and translation of ferritin, ALAS2, and
`mitochondrial aconitase mRNAs. (B) Posttranslational regulation of bifunctional IRP1 in response to iron, NO, and H2O2 via an iron–sulfur cluster switch. (C)
`Iron-dependent degradation of IRP2 by a mechanism involving 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 4
`
`

`

`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`203
`
`which contains five IRE copies in its long and complex 3V
`UTR and is the only thus far
`identified mRNA with
`multiple IREs. As a result, TfR1 expression levels increase
`and the iron-starved cells acquire more iron from trans-
`ferrin. On the other hand, the IRE–IRP interaction in the 5V
`UTR of ferritin mRNAs specifically inhibits their trans-
`lation and the iron-starved cells do not synthesize ferritin,
`which is under these conditions obsolete. Conversely, in
`iron-replete cells, IRP1 and IRP2 get inactivated, thereby
`permitting TfR1 mRNA degradation and ferritin mRNA
`translation. This response inhibits further iron uptake from
`transferrin and promotes the storage (and detoxification) of
`excess intracellular iron.
`The IRE–IRP system also operates beyond the control of
`cellular iron uptake and storage. This became evident with
`the identification and characterization of additional IRE-
`containing mRNAs, primarily encoding proteins of iron and
`energy homeostasis (Johansson and Theil, 2002). Thus, the
`mRNAs encoding the erythroid ALAS2 and mitochondrial
`aconitase contain a ferritin-type btranslationalQ IRE in their
`5V UTR.
`In addition,
`the mRNAs encoding the iron
`transporters DMT1 and ferroportin 1 contain an incom-
`pletely characterized IRE in their 3V or 5V UTR, respectively.
`Interestingly, a radiation-induced deletion of 58 bp within
`ferroportin 1 IRE has been associated with hypochromic
`microcytic anemia in homozygotic, and polycytemia in
`heterozygotic mice (Mok et al., 2004).
`
`Iron regulatory proteins
`
`The iron regulatory proteins, IRP1 and IRP2, function as
`intracellular iron sensors (Hentze et al., 2004; Pantopoulos,
`2004). They share significant homology and belong to the
`protein family of iron–sulfur cluster isomerases that also
`includes mitochondrial aconitase. However, only IRP1 (Fig.
`2B) is able to assemble an aconitase type 4Fe–4S cluster,
`which not only determines the mode of its function, but also
`serves as a major regulatory site. The cluster assembly only
`occurs in iron-replete cells. Under these conditions, IRP1 is
`catalytically active as a cytosolic aconitase but unable to
`bind to IRE sequences. Iron deficiency triggers a slow
`disassembly of the 4Fe–4S cluster and IRP1 acquires IRE-
`binding activity. The actual mechanism for cluster removal
`is still unclear. IRP1 responds to additional stimuli, such as
`NO or H2O2, which also activate IRE binding, albeit by
`different pathways (Pantopoulos et al., 1996). The H2O2-
`mediated activation of IRP1 very likely involves a signaling
`mechanism (Pantopoulos and Hentze, 1998) and warrants
`particular attention in light of the role of this ROI in iron’s
`toxicity (Fig. 1). This response leads to increased iron
`uptake by the TfR1 and reduced storage in ferritin, and may
`be physiologically relevant in the context of inflammation.
`IRP1 by H2O2 can be
`Note that
`the activation of
`antagonized by hypochloric acid (Mu¨tze et al., 2003), the
`product of
`the myeloperoxidase reaction that emerges
`during the respiratory burst of phagocytic cells. This
`
`IRP1 is able to integrate multiple and
`indicates that
`opposing signals, a feature reminiscent of cytokine regu-
`latory networks.
`IRP2 (Fig. 2C) is regulated in response to iron and
`oxygen supply by distinct post-translational mechanisms
`(Hentze et al., 2004; Pantopoulos, 2004). It is synthesized
`de novo in iron-starved cells and remains stable under these
`conditions or in hypoxia. By contrast, IRP2 undergoes
`proteasomal degradation in iron-replete normoxic cells or in
`cells exposed to sodium nitroprusside, an iron-containing
`compound utilized for protein S-nitrosylation. A character-
`istic feature of IRP2 is the insertion of 73 amino acids
`within a region close to its N-terminus. This highly
`conserved 73 amino acids motif is encoded by a distinct
`exon and has been proposed to be crucial for the iron-
`dependent degradation of IRP2 via site-specific oxidation of
`cysteine residues (Iwai et al., 1995). More recent data
`showed that this region is dispensable for IRP2 turnover and
`the signal initiating IRP2 degradation involves the activity
`of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases, by analogy to the
`degradation of HIF-1a (Hanson et al., 2003; Wang et al.,
`2004). Other recent data proposed that the 73 amino acids
`motif plays a role in IRP2 degradation in response to heme
`(Yamanaka et al., 2003) or sodium nitroprusside (Kim et al.,
`2004).
`The targeted disruption of IRP1 and IRP2 has provided
`some insights on the function of these proteins in vivo.
`/
`mice display a mild phenotype with abnormalities
`IRP1
`in iron metabolism restricted to the kidney and brown fat
`/
`mice
`(Meyron Holtz et al., 2004). By contrast, IRP2
`accumulate iron in the intestinal mucosa and the CNS, and
`develop a progressive neurodegenerative disorder (LaVaute
`et al., 2001). Tissue-specific and conditional knockout
`experiments are expected to shed more light on the function
`of IRP1 and IRP2 in the control of cellular and systemic iron
`metabolism.
`
`Body iron homeostasis
`
`Iron distribution in humans
`
`The human body contains approximately 3–5 g of iron
`(45–55 mg/kg of body weight in adult women and men,
`respectively), distributed as illustrated in Fig. 3. The
`majority of body iron (~60–70%)
`is utilized within
`hemoglobin in circulating red blood cells (Andrews,
`1999; Ponka, 1997). Other iron-rich organs are the liver
`and muscles. Approximately 20–30% of body iron is
`stored in hepatocytes and in reticuloendothelial macro-
`phages, to a large extent within ferritin and its degrada-
`tion product hemosiderin. The remaining body iron is
`primarily localized in myoglobin, cytochromes, and iron-
`containing enzymes. A healthy individual absorbs daily
`1–2 mg of
`iron from the diet, which compensates
`nonspecific iron losses by cell desquamation in the skin
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 5
`
`

`

`204
`
`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`Fig. 3. Iron distribution in the adult human body.
`
`In addition, menstruating women
`and the intestine.
`physiologically lose iron from the blood. Erythropoiesis
`requires approximately 30 mg iron/day, which is mainly
`provided by the recycling of iron via reticuloendothelial
`macrophages. These ingest senescent red blood cells and
`release iron to circulating transferrin. The pool of trans-
`ferrin-bound iron (~3 mg) is very dynamic and undergoes
`N10 times daily recycling.
`
`Iron absorption
`
`An average daily Western diet contains approximately 15
`mg of iron, from which only 1–2 mg is absorbed. Two thirds
`from absorbed iron derives from heme, while the remaining
`fraction is inorganic. Both heme and inorganic iron are
`absorbed in the apical membrane of duodenal enterocytes.
`The pathway for heme uptake by the duodenal epithelium is
`still incompletely characterized, while the mechanism for
`inorganic iron transport has been widely explored in the last
`few years. The low pH of the gastric effluent dissolves
`
`ingested inorganic iron and facilitates its enzymatic reduc-
`tion to the ferrous form by the brushborder ferrireductase
`Dcytb (McKie et al., 2001). Ferrous iron is transported
`across the apical membrane by DMT1 (also found in
`literature as DCT1 or Nramp2), a divalent metal transporter
`of broad specificity, including manganese, copper, cobalt,
`zinc, cadmium, and lead cations (Fleming et al., 1997;
`/
`Gunshin et al., 1997). Animals defective in DMT1 (mk
`mice and Belgrade rats) suffer from a severe hypochromic
`microcytic anemia due to impaired iron absorption and
`recycling.
`Inside absorptive enterocytes, heme iron is enzymatically
`liberated by heme oxygenase and follows the fate of
`inorganic iron: It is either stored in ferritin or transported
`across the basolateral membrane to plasma transferrin.
`Basolateral
`iron transport
`is mediated by ferroportin 1
`(Donovan et al., 2000), also found in literature as IREG1
`(McKie et al., 2000) or MTP1 (Abboud and Haile, 2000),
`which is thought to function in concert with the membrane
`ferroxidase hephaestin. The importance of hephaestin in
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 6
`
`

`

`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`205
`
`iron absorption has been denoted by the observation that
`sex-linked anemia (sla) mice with a defect in hephaestin
`display normal dietary iron absorption in enterocytes but
`impaired export of
`iron from the enterocytes to the
`circulation (Vulpe et al., 1999). Consequently, sla mice
`develop microcytic anemia. The export of
`iron from
`enterocytes and its binding to transferrin may also be
`facilitated by the soluble plasma ferroxidase ceruloplasmin
`(Hellman and Gitlin, 2002), which shares significant
`homology with hephaestin.
`
`Maintenance of body iron homeostasis
`
`Mammals do not possess any physiological pathway for
`iron excretion. Thus, body iron homeostasis is regulated at
`the level of iron absorption. Misregulated iron absorption
`leads to iron deficiency or overload. It is believed that three
`regulatory cues contribute to the maintenance of homeo-
`stasis (Andrews, 1999; Finch, 1994). The first is called
`bdietary regulatorQ. It has long been known that after the
`ingestion of a dietary iron bolus, absorptive enterocytes are
`resistant
`in acquiring additional
`iron for several days
`(Stewart et al., 1950). This phenomenon, also described as
`bmucosal blockQ, probably results from the accumulation of
`intracellular iron. High intracellular iron may suppress the
`expression of DMT1 in an IRE–IRP-mediated manner
`(Frazer et al., 2003) because DMT1 contains an IRE in
`the 3V UTR of its mRNA.
`A second signal, called bstores regulatorQ, controls iron
`uptake in response to body iron stores. It is well established
`that in iron-deficient conditions, iron absorption is signifi-
`cantly stimulated by two- to threefold. When iron stores are
`replenished, iron absorption returns to basal levels. It has
`been hypothesized that this type of regulation requires the
`programming of precursor crypt cells (Roy and Enns, 2000)
`in the duodenal epithelium after sensing plasma transferrin
`saturation.
`A third signal, called berythropoietic regulatorQ, modu-
`lates iron absorption in response to erythropoiesis. Because
`most of the body’s iron is utilized by the bone marrow for
`hemoglobinization of red blood cells, it is not surprising that
`this signal has a dominant function in the control of iron
`homeostasis. In other words, the erythropoietic regulator has
`a greater capacity to increase iron absorption compared to the
`stores regulator (Andrews, 1999; Finch, 1994). Moreover, it
`increases iron absorption independently of body iron stores.
`A reason for the pathological iron accumulation encountered
`in disorders with ineffective erythropoiesis (such as thalas-
`semia syndromes, congenital dyserythropoetic anemias,
`sideroblastic anemias, or atransferrinemia) is the increased
`iron absorption under conditions where iron stores are
`replete. The nature of the erythropoietic regulator has
`remained for long time elusive. Recently, a dual function
`compatible with both a bstoresQ and berythropoieticQ
`regulator has been proposed for hepcidin, a small circulating
`peptide derived from the liver (Ganz, 2003).
`
`The function of hepcidin
`
`Hepcidin shares similarity with many antimicrobial
`peptides and was initially isolated from plasma and urine
`ultrafiltrates on the basis of its antimicrobial properties
`(Krause et al., 2000; Park et al., 2001). Unlike other
`antimicrobial peptides, hepcidin is predominantly expressed
`in the liver. The gene encoding hepcidin (HAMP) resides in
`chromosome 19q13 and encodes an 84 amino acid
`precursor. This is processed to a mature, biologically active
`N-terminal peptide of 20–25 residues, upon enzymatic
`cleavage at a site comprising five arginines (Ganz, 2003).
`Overwhelming genetic data underscore the importance of
`hepcidin in the regulation of body iron homeostasis. First,
`/
`mice with disrupted hepcidin expression display
`USF2
`an iron overload phenotype, similar to that observed in
`hereditary hemochromatosis (Nicolas et al., 2001). More-
`over, transgenic mice overexpressing hepcidin from a liver-
`specific promoter display severe iron deficiency anemia
`(Nicolas et al., 2002a). A first link of hepcidin with human
`disease was established by the identification of hepcidin-
`inactivating mutations in a rare form of juvenile hemochro-
`matosis (Roetto et al., 2003). At the other end, increased
`expression of hepcidin clearly contributes to the patho-
`genesis of the anemia of chronic disease (or anemia of
`inflammation), a condition characterized by hypoferremia as
`a result of iron retention within macrophages (Weiss, 2002).
`The expression of hepcidin is induced by lipopolysaccharite
`(Roy et al., 2004) and the inflammatory cytokine IL-6
`(Nemeth et al., 2004), which is typical of a type II acute
`phase molecule. Anemia and hypoxia are negative regu-
`lators (Nicolas et al., 2002b). Hepcidin expression is
`increased in inflammation (Nemeth et al., 2004) and
`secondary iron overload (Adamsky et al., 2004) and is
`suppressed in hereditary hemochromatosis (Bridle et al.,
`2003; Gehrke et al., 2003).
`A model for hepcidin function derived from a growing
`body of experimental data can be summarized as follows
`(Fig. 4): Under physiological conditions, mammals produce
`and maintain relatively stable levels of hepcidin. Low
`hepcidin levels trigger increased iron absorption from the
`duodenum and iron release from reticuloendothelial macro-
`phages. By contrast, increased secretion of hepcidin leads to
`decreased iron absorption and iron retention in reticuloen-
`dothelial macrophages. Hepcidin levels reflect body iron
`stores and the iron demand for erythropoiesis. Thus,
`hepcidin expression is inhibited when body iron stores are
`depleted (e.g., in iron deficiency), or when iron is acutely
`required for erythropoiesis (e.g., in hypoxia and anemia).
`Likewise, hepcidin expression increases when iron stores
`are replenished or during the inflammatory response, where
`erythropoiesis is contained. Hence, hepcidin clearly fulfills
`functions of both berythroidQ as well as bstoresQ regulator.
`It is likely that liver hepatocytes relay signals derived
`from the bone marrow and the sites of
`iron storage
`(hepatocytes and macrophages) that in turn regulate the
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1066 - Page 7
`
`

`

`206
`
`G. Papanikolaou, K. Pantopoulos / Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 202 (2005) 199–211
`
`Fig. 4. (A) The sequence of mature human hepcidin with cysteine disulfide bridges. Cleavage sites giving rise to three isoforms of 25, 22, or 20 amino acids,
`respectively, are indicated by arrows. (B) Model for the regulatory functions of hepcidin. A decrease in plasma hepcidin levels, as a result of reduction in body
`iron stores, requirement for erythropoiesis or hypoxia, promotes dietary iron absorption and iron release from macrophages. An increase in plasma hepcidin
`levels in response to iron loading or inflammation inhibits dietary iron absorption and iron release from macrophages.
`
`production of hepcidin. Because the liver and bone marrow
`the berythroidQ regulation must
`are not adjacent tissues,
`depend on a soluble plasma signal, which remains
`unknown. Hepcidin itself appears to be a final mediator of
`both erythroid and stores regulators and its levels are critical
`for intestinal iron absorption and iron release from macro-
`phages. It should be noted that the above model on hepcidin
`function is almost entirely based on genetic d

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket