throbber
NU RI
`
`ION-
`
`)
`
`THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
`APPLIED AND BASIC NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES
`
`Volume 11
`
`Translated Abstracts
`
`Marchi April
`
`1995
`
`* Editorial Comments
`
`II
`
`Number
`
`2
`
`and Nutrition
`
`Current Concepts in Clinical Nutrition
`Nutritional Considerations
`and Management
`of the Child
`with Human Immunodeficiency
`Virus Infection
`ROBIN A. HENDERSON,
`PHD. RD. AND JOSE M. SAAVEDRA, MD
`
`121 *
`
`*
`
`Applied Nutritional Investigations
`Small Intestinal Malabsorption
`and Colonic
`Fe~entation
`of Resis~ant Starch ,and Resistant
`129
`Peptides
`to Short-Cham Fatty Acids
`tNGE NORDGAARD. MD. PER BR0BECH MORTENSEN. MD. PHD.
`AND ANNA MARlA LANGKILDE, MD
`Leucine Metabolism and Body Cell Mass in
`Cystic Fibrosis
`ROSS W. SHEPHERD. MD. TERRY L. HOLT. PHD.
`LESLIE P. JOHNSON.
`PHD. PAUL QUIRK. BSC. AND
`BRIAN J. THOMAS.
`PHD
`WarIarin and Reduced Central Venous Thrombosis
`in Home Total Parenteral Nutrition Patients
`MANJAKKOLLAt
`P. VEERABAGU. MD.
`JANET TUTTLE·NEWHALL.
`MD. ROY MALIAKKAL. MD.
`RN. AND EDWARD A. MASCIOLI, MD
`CHARLOTTE CHAMPAGNE,
`A Simple Technique
`to Reduce Ventilator-Dependent
`Errors in Oxygen Consumption Measurements
`ROLAND N. DlCKERSON.
`PHARMD.
`JAMES E. MURRELL, CRTI,
`REX O. BROWN. PHARMD. KENNETH A. KUDSK. MD. AND
`KENNETH V. LEEPER,
`JR, MD
`
`138
`
`142
`
`145*
`
`Basic Nutritional Investigations
`Glycerol Gluconeogenesis
`in Fasting Humans
`HIDEFUMI BABA. MD, XIAO-JUN ZHANG, MD, AND
`ROBERT R. WOLFE. PHD
`A Significant Methotrexate-Glutamine
`Pharmacokinetic
`Interaction
`SCOlTL.
`CHARLAND.
`PHARMD. DAVID L. BARTLETT. MD,
`AND MICHAEL H. TOROSIAN, MD
`
`149
`
`154*
`
`International Ward Rounds in Clinical Nutrition
`Metabolic Management
`of Hyper- and Hypocalcemia
`.... 159
`SHEEBA BALAN. BSC, KRISHNAN SRlRAM, MBBS, FRCS(C), FACS,
`AND V. JAYANTHI. MSC
`
`Review Article
`Parenteral
`Iron Dextran Therapy: A Review
`DAVID L. BURNS. MD. EDWARD A. MASCIOLI. MD. AND
`BRUCE R. BISTRIAN. MD. PHD
`
`Roundtable
`in Assessing
`of Visceral Protein Status
`Measurement
`and Energy Malnutrition:
`Standard of Care Prealbumin
`in Nutritional Care Consensus Group*
`
`*For an additional perspective,
`
`see Editorial Comments
`
`.163
`
`Protein
`
`169
`
`Pediatric Gastroenterology
`JAY A. PERMAN, MD
`of Starch and Protein:
`Colonic Fermentation
`An End to All Resistance?
`GEORGE GRIMBLE. MD
`Possible Mechanism(s)
`of Glutamine-Mediated
`Protection
`v. SUZANNE KLIMBERG. MD
`Technical Aspects of Metabolic Measurements
`RICHARD D. BRANSON. RRT
`Clinton Health Care Reform •.•The Inside Track
`Carrots and Sticks
`177
`GREGG S. MEYER. MD, MSC
`Public Policy and Nutrition Practice
`To Keep Jane WelI...She Needs
`Integrated
`Patient-Centered
`Care
`ALISON B. KJNG. PHD
`Random Bytes
`Simple Linear Regression Correlation
`MARCELLO PAGANO. PHD
`NutritionlMetabolism Classic With•..
`Neuropsychiatric
`Disorders Caused by Cobalamin
`Deficiency
`in Absence of Anemia or Macrocytosis
`I. LINDENBAUM.
`B.B. HEALTON, D.G. SAVAGE,
`I.C.M. BRUST.
`T.!. GARRETI,
`E.R. PODELL.
`P.O. MARCELL,
`S.P. STABLER,
`R.H. ALLEN
`... Prospective Overview
`NORMAN G. EGGER. MD, AND KARL E. ANDERSON. MD
`1994 John M. Kinney Annual International
`Award for Nutrition and Metabolism
`Book Reviews
`•..And In the Next Issue
`Contents of Sister Journals
`Calender of Events
`Guidelines for Publishing Symposium
`Proceedings
`Supplement
`Years Later:
`The Skeleton in the Hospital Closet-20
`Malnutrition
`in Patients with OI Disease, Cancer
`and AIDS
`
`172
`
`173
`
`175
`
`176
`
`Host
`
`178
`
`179
`
`181
`
`180
`
`183
`
`187
`
`153
`
`.189
`
`190
`
`VI
`
`191
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1030 - Page 1
`
`

`

`REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Nutrition Vol. II, No.2, 1995
`
`Parenteral Iron Dextran Therapy: A Review
`
`DAVID L. BURNS, MD, EDWARD A. MASCIOLI, MD, AND BRUCE R. BISTRIAN, MD, PHD
`
`of Medicine, New England Deaconess Hospital,
`From the Nutrition Support Service, Department
`Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Date accepted: 30 November
`
`1994
`
`ABSlRACT
`treatment of iron deficiency anemia that is refractory to
`Iron dextran was introduced more than 30 yr ago for the parenteral
`Iron dextran is a preparation of ferric hydroxide complexed with a low molecular weight fraction of dextran.
`oral therapy.
`Iron
`deficiency anemia is one of the most common nutritional deficiency diseases and occurs worldwide secondary to inadequate
`dietary iron, usually with excessive gastrointestinal blood losses. Repletion of iron stores is often complicated by intolerance to
`oral
`iron supplementation
`and may require parenteral
`iron. Parenteral
`iron can be administered via the intramuscular or
`intravenous route either directly or as an additive to total parenteral nutrition. Both routes of administration can cause various
`side effects and a test dose is recommended before therapeutic administration to assess the risk for anaphylaxis. Although the
`efficacy and safety of parenteral
`iron dextran have been convincingly demonstrated, supplementation may be contraindicated in
`the setting of infection. Nutrition 1995; 11:163-168
`
`Key words: iron, dextran, iron deficiency, total parenteral nutrition, infection, side effects
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Iron dextran first became available in 1952 and was initially
`administered to children with iron deficiency.
`Iron dextran was
`hailed as effective
`and safe therapy that could be administered
`regardless of the patient's
`ability to take oral
`iron supplements.
`The drug was administered intramuscularly
`by multiple injections
`with a low incidence of adverse reactions.
`In 1963, Basul' was
`the first
`to describe total dose infusion (TDI) of iron dextran to
`replenish iron stores completely with one parenteral dose of iron.
`In 1973,
`the Food and Drug Administration
`approved
`the
`intravenous
`route of administration
`of iron dextran for patients
`with documented iron deficiency.
`and low
`hydroxide
`of ferric
`Iron dextran
`is a complex
`The dextran
`molecular mass (5,000 to 10,000 daltons) dextran.
`iron dextran
`serves as a protective
`lipophilic colloid.
`Parenteral
`is commercially
`available
`as a sterile solution
`containing
`50 g
`elemental
`iron/L that is predominantly
`in the ferric state.
`It is
`Iron deficiency
`is the most common cause of anemia.
`estimated that >500 million people worldwide
`are iron deficient
`-20 million
`with
`in the United
`States
`alone.?
`Chronic
`gastrointestinal blood loss is the most prevalent etiologic factor in
`adults with iron deficiency anemia. Other
`factors
`include iron-
`poor diets,
`impaired iron absorption, and in hospitalized
`patients,
`nosocomial
`anemia from repeated phlebotomy.v'
`The mainstay
`of therapy is repletion of iron stores through the oral or parenteral
`route although diagnosis,
`and where indicated,
`treatment of the
`underlying etiology are essential.
`
`DIAGNOSIS OF IRON DEFICIENCY
`by
`of iron deficiency
`is made serologically
`The diagnosis
`noninvasive means and is characterized
`by three phases.
`Initially,
`iron store depletion
`is associated
`with increased
`gut
`iron
`absorption,
`decreased
`serum iron,
`increased
`serum transferrin,
`and decreased serum ferritin. This is followed by iron-deficient
`erythropoiesis
`that
`is associated with a serum iron to transferrin
`saturation
`<16%, an erythrocyte
`protoporphyrin
`concentration
`<100 mglL, and a serum ferritin concentration <12 ~gIL without
`recognizable
`anemia. The third phase is iron deficiency anemia,
`characterized
`by hypochromic,
`microcytic
`red blood celIs.5,6
`Classically,
`the histopathological
`diagnosis of iron deficiency is
`based on the absence of stainable iron in the bone marrow.
`
`IRON BALANCE AND ABSORPTION
`iron is -4-5 g with
`a daily
`body content
`of
`total
`The
`of 1 mg absorbed/day
`in normal men and normal,
`requirement
`nonmenstruating women.
`Iron requirements
`are based on daily
`obligate
`losses
`from the skin, desquamation
`of gastrointestinal
`mucosal cells, and microscopic bleeding from the gut and kidney.
`During menstruation,
`iron losses may increase by an additional
`I
`mg/day.
`The average dietary iron intake in the United States is 5-7 mg
`per 1000 kcaI. Healthy people absorb 5-10% of dietary iron:
`the
`Recommended
`Dietary Allowance
`(RDA)
`is 15 mg.
`In iron
`deficiency
`or in late pregnancy,
`absorption
`can increase
`to
`10-20% or 4-6 rug/day." The recommended
`daily dose for oral
`to maximally replete iron stores is 180-220
`iron supplementation
`
`. Correspondence to: E. A. Mascioli, MD, New England Deaconess Hospital, 194 Pilgrim Road, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
`
`163
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1030 - Page 2
`
`

`

`164
`
`TABLE!.
`
`INDICATIONS FOR PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN
`
`Indications
`syndrome
`Malabsorption
`Short bowel syndrome
`Chronic bowel obstruction
`Inflammatory bowel disease
`Long-term total parenteral nutrition
`Chronic. uncorrected bleeding
`Hemodialysis. particularly with erythropoietin treatment
`Relative indications
`High intake of antacids,
`Oral iron intolerance
`Noncompliance with oral regimen
`
`tea, or clay
`
`iron. but this may be limited by gastrointestinal
`mg elemental
`intolerance. Thus. with supplementation,
`iron absorption can be
`increased to a maximum of 40-50 mg/day, which is given most
`commonly as ferrous sulfate in 325-mg tablets that contain -60
`mg elemental
`iron. Different
`salts of oral
`iron exist, but side
`effects are due [0 the amount of oral iron and not to the salt.
`In the acidic medium of the stomach,
`inorganic
`iron is
`solubilized,
`ionized to the ferrous form, and chelated. Ascorbic
`acid, amino acids, and some sugars promote iron absorption by
`forming iron chelates
`that are taken up by the small bowel."
`Impaired gastric acid secretion occurs in elderly patients as the
`result
`of age-related
`achlorhydria
`and in patients
`after
`gasrrecromles.!
`Such individuals have impaired iron absorption
`that is related to decreased solubilization and chelation of dietary
`iron.
`in the duodenum and
`is most efficient
`Iron absorption
`iron is more readily
`Divalent
`ferrous
`proximal
`jejunum.
`ferric iron because of its low solubility at
`adsorbed than trivalent
`the alkaline pH of intestinal
`fluid. Once ferrous iron traverses
`the mucus layer to the mucosal brush border,
`it is oxidized to the
`ferric form.
`Iron absorption consists of two phases: uptake of
`luminal
`iron into small bowel mucosal
`cells and subsequent
`release into the circulation.
`Ferric iron in the plasma is taken up
`in a ratio of two iron molecules per molecule of
`by transferrin
`transferrin,"
`and heme
`in hemoglobin, myoglobin,
`Heme iron, present
`Iron.''' This is
`enzymes,
`is better absorbed
`than is elemental
`related to a different mechanism of absorption.
`Heme can be
`directly taken up by the mucosal cells after globin is removed.
`Lower
`socioeconomic
`populations
`such as in the Third World
`often have diets that are poor in heme iron, resulting in reduced
`iron availability. 11
`system release iron
`in the reticuloendothelial
`Macrophages
`red blood cells to
`resulting
`from the destruction
`of senescent
`80-90% of iron
`transferrin
`for reutilization.
`Approximately
`bound to transferrin is destined for hemoglobin production within
`for I mg of the
`t~e ery~ro?Iast.6
`Dietary absorption accounts
`cIrculat~ng Iron p~ol of 30--35 milligrams that cycles daily.
`to
`~adlOlabeled non dextran injected into patients
`localizes
`the liver, spleen, and sacrum before being incorporated into red
`cell hemoglobin. The half-life for clearance of radiolabeled iron
`dextran from the serum of iron-deficient
`subjects ranges from 5.9
`h to 2.5 days, and -40% is bound to transferrin within 11 h. The
`rate of plasma
`clearance
`is unrelated
`to the degree of iron
`deficiency.I':'!
`
`PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN THERAPY
`
`IRON
`FOR PARENTERAL
`INDICATIONS
`The oral route of iron therapy is preferred to the parenteral
`route on the basis of ease of administration, much reduced cost,
`and fewer
`side effects.
`Table I lists common conditions
`that
`often require parenteral
`iron dextran treatment.
`The principal
`indication for parenteral
`iron dextran is the failure to respond to
`oral
`iron supplementation
`in patients with iron deficiency
`anemia.
`Common
`reasons
`for
`failure
`include
`poor
`iron
`absorption,
`oral
`intolerance
`usually
`related
`to significant
`or
`gastrointestinal
`side effects
`such as severe
`constipation
`of
`diarrhea, and patient noncompliance.
`Extensive consumption
`gut
`antacids,
`clay,
`tea, coffee,
`or phytates
`in bran inhibit
`iron
`absorption
`and may reduce
`the efficacy
`of enteral
`or
`therapy.
`13.14 As previously
`mentioned,
`achlorhydria
`gastrectomy
`reduce
`dietary
`iron
`availability.
`Dietary
`manipulation with exclusion of these inhibitors of iron absorption
`and attention to gastrointestinal
`intolerance may improve oral
`iron compliance
`and absorption,
`thus avoiding
`the risks of
`parenteral supplementation.
`Hypoproliferative
`anemia is a common side effect of end-
`stage renal disease in patients undergoing hemodialysis
`and it is
`secondary to decreased
`endogenous
`erythropoietin
`production.
`Hemodialysis
`results
`in chronic blood loss with a negative
`iron
`of 1-2 g/yr.
`balance
`Patients
`with
`uremia may
`have
`gastrointestinal
`intolerance
`to oral
`iron repletion and restoration
`of hemoglobin
`to the normal
`level may necessitate
`parenteral
`supplementation.
`IS This need has become particularly
`apparent
`therapy."
`during the era of recombinant
`human erythropoietin
`Finally,
`iron dextran may be indicated
`for patients
`with
`significant blood loss after major surgery. Many such patients
`are unable to tolerate
`sufficiently
`rapid oral
`repletion
`or may
`decline red cell transfusions despite requiring rapid restoration of
`
`TABLE II.
`
`SIDE EFFECTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF
`PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN
`
`Short-term (intramuscular or intravenous administration)
`Anaphylaxis
`Urticaria
`Hypotension
`Nausea or emesis
`Bronchospasm
`Pruritus
`Fever
`Seizures
`Arthralgia
`Headache
`Myalgia
`Flushing
`Lymphadenopathy
`Phlebitis
`Chest, back, or abdominal pain
`Rigors
`Long-term
`Iron overload (intravenous and intramuscular)
`Complications of intramuscular administration
`Chronic pain at the site of injection
`Skin staining
`Local skin atrophy
`Abscess
`Sarcoma formation
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1030 - Page 3
`
`

`

`r
`
`PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN THERAPY
`
`iron stores for hemoglobin production.
`
`ADVERSE EFFECTS
`and
`to iron dextran infusion are variable
`reactions
`Adverse
`can be graded
`from mild or transient
`to severe
`or even life-
`threatening
`anaphylaxis
`(Table
`II). Most
`reactions
`occur
`immediately
`during administration
`of the test dose and may
`include dyspnea; headache;
`flushing;
`chest, abdominal,
`or back
`pain;
`nausea;
`emesis;
`bronchospasm;
`fever;
`seizures;
`hypotension;
`urticaria;
`and anaphylaxis.
`Delayed
`reactions
`occurring 1-3 days later
`include myalgia,
`arthralgia,
`phlebitis,
`and lymphadenopathy.
`reviewed the existing literature on 2400
`In 1968, wallerstein'"
`patients who received intravenous
`iron dextran and reported an
`overall adverse reaction rate of 1-2%. The intramuscular
`and
`intravenous
`routes of administration
`had similar
`incidences
`of
`side effects.
`In addition
`to acute
`systemic
`adverse
`effects,
`rhabdomyolysis
`and late sarcoma formation have been reported
`with intramuscular
`iron dextran administration.Jv'?
`Hamstra et a1.15studied 481 patients given an intravenous
`iron
`dextran dose of 250-500 mg at a rate of <I00 mg/min. Overall,
`125 patients
`(26%) experienced
`a reaction, most of which were
`mild. Eight were delayed reactions
`characterized
`by arthralgia,
`myalgia,
`fever,
`adenopathy,
`thrombophlebitis,
`pulmonary
`embolism,
`or erythema
`nodosum.
`Three
`of 481 patients
`developed life-threatening
`anaphylactoid
`reactions
`characterized
`by hypotension,
`cyanosis,
`syncope, bronchospasm,
`purpura, and
`respiratory
`arrest.
`Severe reactions were associated with large
`iron doses given to small patients and were also more frequent
`in
`women with collagen vascular disease."
`to exacerbate
`TDIs of iron dextran
`have been reported
`symptoms of rheumatoid
`arthritis and collagen vascular disease
`and have been associated with a greater
`incidence of anaphylaxis
`In a study of 11 patients with
`in patients with these conditions.
`rheumatoid arthritis who were given TDIs, Blake et a1.20found
`that
`two patients
`had anaphylactic
`reactions
`and nine had an
`exacerbation of synovitis.
`to have induced
`has been reported
`Iron dextran
`infusion
`systemic
`lupus erythematosus
`in a patient with a history
`of
`polyarthritis
`but no serologic
`evidence
`of lupus;"
`After
`intravenous
`administration
`of iron dextran,
`the patient developed
`a malar
`rash, polyarthritis,
`periungual
`vasculitis,
`elevated
`erythrocyte
`sedimentation
`rate, positive antinuclear
`antibody, and
`antidouble stranded DNA antibody. The proposed mechanism of
`the increased likelihood of adverse reactions
`to iron dextran in
`patients with collagen vascular disease include a hypersensitivity
`to dextran, a toxic effect of iron on synovium by generation of
`free
`radicals
`and
`peroxidation
`of
`lipids,22,23
`and
`reticuloendothelial
`system blockade
`resulting
`in a secondary
`immune complex synovitis."
`Auerbach
`et aJ.25 studied 87 patients with iron deficiency
`anemia and absent bone marrow iron stores
`to define
`adverse
`reactions and the optimal
`rate of infusion of TDIs and to assess
`the role of premedication.
`Two patients
`had anaphylactoid
`reactions
`in response
`to the test dose.
`Their
`symptoms were
`relieved with intravenous diphenhydramine, methylprednisolone,
`and subcutaneous
`epinephrine. Delayed transient
`reactions
`such
`as myalgia, arthralgia, and fever occurred in 37 patients and were
`controlled with nonsteroidal
`anti-inflammatory
`agents.
`The
`group concluded that
`the TDI method was safe if there was no
`reaction to the test dose and the infusion rate did not exceed 6
`mg/min. Premedication was not necessary for the relatively low
`incidence
`of severe
`side
`effects,
`but diphenhydramine,
`epinephrine, and methylprednisolone
`should be available.
`is
`The incidence
`of anaphylactic
`reactions
`to iron dextran
`variable and ranges from 0.6% to 2.3%, whereas the incidence of
`
`165
`
`at 0.2% to 0.3%.26
`is estimated
`reactions
`acute hypersensitivity
`Patients with underlying rheumatoid
`arthritis or collagen vascular
`disease
`are at greater
`risk for severe systemic or anaphylactoid
`reactions.
`
`IRON DEXTRAN ADMINISTRATION
`IN1RAMUSCULAR
`or
`Parenteral
`iron can be administered
`either
`intramuscularly
`is limited to 2 ml or
`intravenously.
`Intramuscular
`administration
`100 mg iron per
`injection
`and patients
`often require multiple
`doses
`to replete
`iron stores.
`Iron dextran manufacturers
`recommend
`that
`all patients
`receive
`a 0.5 ml
`(25 mg)
`intramuscular
`test dose
`before
`therapeutic
`iron
`dextran
`administration.
`A period y 1 h of observation
`should
`elapse
`before therapeutic
`dosing. Both the test and therapeutic
`doses
`should be given by deep intramuscular
`injection into the buttock
`via the Z-track
`technique
`(displacement
`of the skin laterally
`before injection).25,27
`should be avoided in patients
`Intramuscular
`administration
`with coagulation
`defects or inadequate muscle bulle Generally
`patients may experience
`local
`symptoms
`of persistent
`pain,
`subcutaneous
`atrophy,
`skin staining,
`necrosis,
`sterile
`abscess
`formation, or late occurrence of sarcoma in addition to systemic
`effects.18,28
`side
`Because
`of
`local
`complications
`and
`unpredictable
`intramuscular
`absorption,
`the American Medical
`Association Drug Evaluations
`discourages
`intramuscular
`iron
`dextran administration
`in favor of the intravenous
`route."
`
`IRON DEXTRAN ADMINISTRATION
`INTRAVENOUS
`Iron dextran can be administered
`intravenously
`as undiluted
`injection, or as a TDI or an additive to total parenteral nutrition
`(TPN). Undiluted iron dextran is given with a test dose of I to 2
`drops (-2 mg) followed in 15 min by an additional
`test dose of
`25 mg (0.5 ml).
`If no reaction is evident, a total of 100 mg (2 ml)
`may be given daily at a rate <50 mg/min (I mllmin).
`of the total
`If
`larger
`iron doses
`are required,
`infusion
`calculated dose should be done as a single administration. A TOI
`of iron dextran is the dose of iron required to replete iron stores
`in one infusion. The dose of iron required to replenish stores and
`to normalize
`hemoglobin
`(Hb)
`is calculated
`by the following
`equation."
`
`Iron (mg) ; 0.3 x weight (Ibs) x
`[100 - (actual Hh (g/dl) x 100)/desired Hh]
`
`in 500-1000 ml
`be diluted
`dose should
`The therapeutic
`in water. A few milliliters
`physiologic
`saline or 5% dextrose
`should be slowly infused as a test and if no reaction occurs after
`15 min observation,
`the solution can be administered at a rate of
`1 Lover
`4-6 h. Because
`of the small but significant
`risk of
`anaphylaxis,
`patients should be observed closely. Manufacturers
`recommend
`that emergency medications
`including
`epinephrine
`equipment be readily available.26,27.29
`and resuscitative
`
`EFFICACY OF IRON DEXTRAN TOTAL DOSE INFUSION
`Ashby'? gave TDIs of iron dextran to 79 surgical patients with
`iron deficiency anemia:
`the range of iron doses was not specified,
`nor was a control group available.
`Initial average hemoglobin
`concentration was 83 gIL, which increased
`significantly
`to 125
`gIL 30 days after
`iron infusion.
`No serious
`adverse
`reactions
`occurred, but two patients did report
`transient arthralgias.
`with
`Iron
`deficiency
`anemia
`is common
`in children
`TDIs
`inflammatory
`bowel disease. Halpin et aJ.33 administered
`and
`of
`iron dextran
`to six children
`with Crohn's
`disease
`ulcerative
`colitis after correction
`of weight
`loss and nutritional
`deficiencies with TPN. The children tolerated the infusion with
`no reactions.
`The doses
`ranged from 275 to 840 mg elemental
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1030 - Page 4
`
`

`

`e_
`
`G
`
`- 11'
`
`166
`
`PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN THERAPY
`
`iron. All patients achieved a satisfactory increase in hemoglobin
`with an average rise of 35 gIL.
`and
`gynecologic
`51 surgical.
`Mays and Mays34 studied
`obstetric patients with depleted iron stores. TDls ranged from
`1000 to 4500 mg elemental
`iron. One week after infusion the
`was 19 gIL. No adverse
`average
`increase
`in hemoglobin
`reactions were reported.
`
`added to TPN in six patients with
`iron dextran
`of high-dose
`massive
`acute blood loss and in two patients with chronic
`anemia. The maximum dose of iron dextran per liter of TPN was
`500 mg and the maximum total iron dose administered was 7000
`mg over 5 days in this series. The acute blood loss group had an
`average increase in hemoglobin of 56 gIL over 23 days, and the
`chronic anemia patients had an increase of 68 gIL over 121 days.
`
`CONSIDERATION OF IRON
`PHARMACOLOGIC
`SUPPLEMENTATION
`OF TPN
`Commercially available trace elements are routinely added to
`TPN admixtures.
`In the United States, commercial
`trace element
`formulations do not contain iron, however, products available in
`Europe may contain 1-2.5 mg.
`studied TPN admixtures of
`In 1978, Hauer and Kaminski"
`dextrose,
`lipid, and water
`amino acids in protein hydrolysates,
`and found that
`the concentration
`of iron varied from 0.025 to
`1.370 mg/L, which may have been related to contamination
`in
`production.
`Sayers et at.36 tested the addition of ferrous citrate to
`TPN.
`In vitro iron citrate was stable in TPN and was available to
`transferrin, with a mean availability in vivo of 81%. Wan and
`Tsallas37 in 1980 demonstrated stability over a period of 3 rna of
`diluted iron dextran at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml with benzyl
`alcohol.
`TPN solutions containing lipid or three-in-one admixtures are
`subject
`to physicochemical
`restrictions.
`All commercially
`available lipid preparations use an anionic egg yolk phosphatide
`emulsifier. Care should be taken when adding trivalent cations
`such as ferric iron to three- in-one admixtures, The surface charge
`of Iipid particles can be neutralized,
`causing breakdown of the
`admixture,
`coalescence
`of the lipid droplets,
`and cracking or
`creaming
`of
`the lipid
`component.
`38 Recommendations
`concerning the compatibility
`of iron in three-in-one
`admixtures
`vary between
`the two major American
`providers
`of lipid
`emulsion.
`At our institution,
`lipid-containing
`TPN has been
`limited to 2 mg iron dextran per bag, and 10 rug in nonlipid bags,
`although this is an area of current
`investigation.
`
`EFFICACY OF IRON DEXTRAN
`SUPPLEMENTATION
`IN TPN
`support of patients
`TPN is a valuable tool. for the nutritional
`who are unable to tolerate sufficient enteral nutrition, The daily
`recommendation
`for parenteral
`iron supplementation ranges from
`0.5 to 3.9 mg/day.39-41 Patients who are nutritionally
`replete
`before initiation
`of TPN may develop a negative iron balance
`with depletion of iron stores. This is due to an estimated loss of 1
`mg iron daily in normal adults with the additional
`contribution
`from blood Joss due to surgery or phlebotomy."
`Norton et al.43 prospectively
`studied 42 patients
`receiving
`TPN to evaluate the optimal
`iron dextran dose to restore serum
`Four treatment groups received either 0, 25,
`iron concentrations.
`97.5,
`or 175 mg iron weekly
`in their
`TPN.
`Before
`supplementation with TPN, all four groups had low serum iron
`concentrations,
`total iron binding capacity, and hemoglobin.
`The
`patients
`supplemented with 87.5 and 175 mg/wk had increased
`after 3 wk of TPN. However, 80% of
`serum iron concentrations
`the group receiving 175 mg/wk had serum iron concentrations
`greater than the upper
`limit of normal. No untoward reactions
`occurred and no significant
`increase in the risk of infection was
`observed. They concluded that 87.5 mg iron supplemented
`in
`TPN per week was safe and consistently
`raised serum iron
`concentrations
`to the normal range over a 3-wk period.
`.Poner et al." demonstrated the relative safety of lower doses
`?f iron dextran (~ mg/day) in TPN. in a patient
`intolerant
`to rapid
`iron dextran adrmmstration. Dudnck et al.45 investigated the use
`
`IRON OVERLOAD
`in excess iron
`The improper administration
`of iron can result
`administered
`stores. The body's
`ability to excrete parenterally
`iron is limited,
`and the reticuloendothelial
`system sequesters
`excess iron, resulting in hepatosplenic
`siderosis.
`Iron overload
`has been observed
`in hemodialysis
`patients
`and in long-term
`home TPN patients receiving modest doses (2 mg) of daily iron
`(D.B., personal communicauonj.w"
`
`IRON AND INFECTION
`is
`and iron deficiency
`between
`infection
`The relationship
`unclear and there is controversy within the literature."
`Studies
`suggest decreased infectious
`risk in iron-deficient
`children given
`iron-fortified milk compared with control
`subjects,
`but
`it
`is
`unclear what
`role poverty, malnutrition,
`and problems
`in
`experimental design may have played.49,5o
`iron
`are
`response
`Several
`components
`of the immune
`mediated
`and may be depressed
`in the setting of deficiency.
`Kuvibidila et aJ.51fed-mice iron-deficient diets and demonstrated
`atrophy of the thymus with depletion of thymocytes.
`Chandra'?
`showed impaired numbers of circulating
`blood neutrophils
`and
`capacity for generation
`of the oxidative burst necessary
`to kill
`phagocytized bacteria in iron-deficient patients.
`response
`Infection or sepsis initiates a systemic inflammatory
`(SIR),
`the goals of which are to limit injury, aid tissue repair, and
`augment
`immunity. Classic responses include fever, hypotension,
`tachycardia,
`hyperglycemia,
`increased protein catabolism,
`and
`decreased
`iron-transferrin
`saturation.
`Elevated
`release
`of
`cytokines
`are the hallmark
`and include
`interleukin-L,
`tumor
`necrosis
`factor, and interleukin-fi.U These occur
`in conjunction
`with elevated
`concentrations
`of glucagon,
`cortisol,
`and
`epinephrine
`and serve to mediate the metabolic
`cascade of the
`SIR.
`iron
`of parenteral
`to the administration
`A potential side effect
`is an increased risk for infectious complications.>'
`Children with
`kwashiorkor-type malnutrition
`and low serum transferrin who
`were
`given
`nutritional
`support
`that
`included
`oral
`iron
`supplements
`had a higher mortality rate than did children with
`normal
`serum transferrin
`concentrations
`who were given
`comparable
`nutritional
`interventions.
`Septicemia with Yersinia
`enterocolitica
`has been reported in healthy children who took
`overdoses of oral
`iron.56
`Iron-deficient
`Somali nomads
`treated
`with oral
`iron demonstrated
`a greater
`than five-fold increase
`in
`infectious
`complications
`compared with those who received
`placebos; most of the complications
`represented
`reactivation
`of
`underlying malaria, brucellosis, or tuberculosis.?
`of body
`Several authors
`report
`that
`in vitro supplementation
`fluids, such as plasma, with iron overcomes natural
`immunity."
`In general, doubling the saturation of the iron-binding protein in
`animal models yields a marked increase in the growth of various
`pathogens. Microorganisms
`require iron for growth and most
`acquire iron from their host. Microbes
`synthesize iron transport
`proteins or siderophores
`that compete with transferrin
`for free
`iron. 59 Depressed
`serum iron values have been documented
`during
`infectious
`diseases.
`Proposed mechanisms
`include
`decreased
`intestinal
`iron absorption
`and cytokine-mediated
`sequestration
`of iron into tissue stores, predominantly with the
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1030 - Page 5
`
`

`

`PARENTERAL IRON DEXTRAN THERAPY
`
`167
`
`flux 'Of iron into the reticuloendothelial
`system and the liver.58-tiO
`Given these data, use of either oral or parenteral
`iron in the
`patient at high risk of serious
`infection
`should be discouraged
`pending further study.
`
`SUMMARY
`iron
`safety and efficacy profiles of parenteral
`The acceptable
`iron
`dextran have been demonstrated.
`The use of parenteral
`should be limited to patients with documented
`iron deficiency
`anemia
`and failed
`oral
`iron
`repletion.
`All
`parenteral
`
`for the low dose of 2 mg
`except
`of iron dextran,
`administration
`provided in TPN, should be preceded by a test dose to evaluate
`susceptibility
`to systemic reactions.
`Patients
`should be observed
`closely and emergency
`resuscitative
`equipment
`and medication
`including
`epinephrine
`should be immediately
`available.
`Care
`should be taken in calculation
`of the replacement
`dose to avoid
`iron overload.
`In patients with underlying
`infection,
`the benefits
`of iron repletion need to be weighed against
`the potential
`risk of
`exacerbating infectious complications.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`in iron
`
`1 Am Med Assoc
`
`1. Basu SK, Rapid administration of iron-dextran in late pregnancy.
`Lancet 1963;1:1430
`2. Finch CA, Huebers H. Medical progress, perspectives
`metabolism. NEnglJMed
`1982;306:1520
`3. Eyster E, Bemene 1. Nosocomial
`anemia.
`1973;223:73
`4. Cook J, Finch CA. Assessing the iron status of a population. Am 1
`Clin Nutr 1979;32:2115
`5. Lipschitz DA, Cook 10. Finch CA. A clinical evaluation of ferritin
`as an index of iron stores. N Engl 1Med 1974;290:1213
`6. Woods S, DeMarco T, Friedland M. Iron metabolism. Am 1
`GastroenterolI990;85:1
`7. Cook JD. Morek TA. Lynch SR. The inhibitory effect of soy
`products on nonheme iron absorption in man. Am J Clin Nutr
`1981;34:2622
`8. Conrad ME, Schade SG. Ascorbic acid in iron absorption: a role for
`hydrochloric acid and bile. Gastroenterology 1968;55:35
`9. Cavill J, Jacobs A, Worwood M. Diagnostic methods for iron status.
`Ann Clin Biochem 1986;23:168
`10. Hallberg L. Bioavailability of dietary iron in man. Annu Rev Nutr
`1981;1:123
`II. Kamakakom K. Cavill I,Jacobs A. The metabolism of intravenously
`administered iron-dextran. Br J HaematoI1973;25:637
`12. Wood JK, Milner PFA, Pathak UN. The metabolism of iron-dextran
`given as a total dose infusion to iron deficient Jamaican subjects. Br
`JHaematoI1968;14:119
`13. Tumlund JR, Smith RG, Kretsch Ml, et at. Milk's effect on the
`bioavailabllity of iron from cereal-based diets in young women by
`use of in vitro and in vivo methods. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:373
`14. Hallberg L. Rossander L, Skanberg AB. Phytates and the inhibitory
`effect of bran on iron absorption
`in man. Am J Clin Nutr
`1987;45:988
`Intravenous iron dextran in
`15. Hamstra RD, Block NM, Schocket AL.
`clinical medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1980;243:1726
`16. Grutzmacher P, Tsobanelis T, Roth P, et al. Effect of recombinant
`human erythropoietin on iron balance in maintenance hemodialysis:
`theoretical" considerations, clinical experience and consequences.
`Clin NephroI1992;38:S92
`17. Wallerstein RO.
`Intravenous
`1968;32:690
`18. Greenberg O. Sarcoma after intramuscular iron injection. Br Med 1
`1976;3: 1508
`after
`19. Foulkes WD, Sewry C, Calam 1. et a1. Rhabdomyolysis
`intramuscular
`iron dextran in malabsorption. Ann Rheum Dis
`1991;50:184
`20. Blake DR, Lunec 1, Ahem M, et al. Effect of intravenous iron
`dextran on rheumatoid synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1985;44:183
`21. Oh VMS. Iron dextran and systemic lupus erythematosus. Br Med J
`1992;305:1000
`22. Blake DR. Hall NO, Bacon PA, et aJ. The importance of iron in
`rheumatoid disease. Lancet 1981;2:1142
`23. Reddy PS, Lewis M. The adverse effect of intravenous iron-dextran
`in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1969;12:454
`24. Ron D. The reticuloendothelial
`system and rheumatoid arthritis.
`Lancet 1979;2:901
`25. Auerbach M. Witt D, Toler W, et al. Clinical use of the total dose
`intravenous infusion of iron dextran. J Lab Clin Med 1988;111:566
`26. Physicians' Desk Reference. Montvale, NJ:Medic

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket