throbber
ALLERGY
`CLINICAL
`IMMUNOLOGY
`
`AND
`
`~
`
`SYMPOSI
`PROCEEDINGS ON
`DRUG ALLERGY: PREVENTION,
`DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT
`
`December 1, 1983
`W ashington, D.C.
`
`1-'diton
`Robert A. Goldstein, M.D., Ph.D., and Roy Patterson, M .D.
`
`Editonal A11i.1w111
`Janet Ayres
`
`!,po111or"d /11
`The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
`National Center for Drugs and Biologics (FDA)
`in coopcrution 11"11/,
`American Academy of Allergy and Immunology
`Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America
`S11pponed /J)
`Boehringer lngelheim
`Schering Corporation
`Pu blished monthly by The C. V . M osby Company
`
`ISSN 0091-6749
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF
`
`AND
`
`ALLERGY
`CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
`October, 1984
`
`VOLUME 74
`
`NUMBER 4
`PART2
`
`SYMPOSIUM
`PROCEEDINGS ON
`DRUG ALLERGY: PREVENTION,
`DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT
`
`December 1, 1983
`Washington, D.C.
`
`-IEAL TH SCIENCES UBRi-,i=:Y
`University of Wisconsin
`1305 Linden Dr .. Madison, Wis. 53706
`
`OCT 2 2 1984
`
`Editors
`Robert A. Goldstein, M.D., Ph.D., and Roy Patterson, M.D.
`
`Editorial Assistalll
`Janet Ayres
`
`Sponsored by
`The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
`National Center for Drugs and Biologics (FDA)
`in cooperation with
`American Academy of Allergy and Immunology
`Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America
`
`

`

`Faculty
`
`N. Franklin Adkinson, M.D.
`The Johns Hopki11s University School of Medicine
`Baltimore, Md.
`
`Robert A. Goldstein, M.D., Ph.D.
`National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
`National lnstitures of Health
`Bethesda, Md.
`
`Paul A. Greenberger, M.D.
`Northwestern University
`Chicago, Ill.
`
`Hershel Jick, M.D.
`Boston Medical School
`Boston University
`Boston. Mass.
`
`Allen P. Kaplan, M.D.
`State University of New York at Stony Brook
`Stony Brook, N.Y.
`
`Richard M. Krause, M.D.
`National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
`National Institutes of Health
`Bethesda. Md.
`
`Kenneth P. Mathews, M.D.
`University of Michigan
`A1111 Arbor, Mich.
`
`J. Michael McGinnis, M.D.
`Public Health Service
`U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
`Washington, D.C.
`
`Paul D. Parkman, M.D.
`National Center for Drugs and Biologics, FDA, PHS
`U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
`Bethesda, Md.
`
`Roy Patterson, M.D.
`Northwestern University
`Medical School
`Chicago, Ill.
`
`Michael Schatz, M.D.
`Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center and
`University of San Diego S/hool of Medicine
`San Diego, Calif.
`
`Albert L. Sheffer, M.D.
`Harvard Medical School
`Boston, Mass.
`
`Ronald A. Simon, M.D.
`Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation and
`University of California San Diego
`School of Medicine
`San Diego, Calif.
`
`Dorothy D. Sogn, M.D.
`National lnstirure of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
`National Institutes of Health
`Bethesda, Md.
`
`Donald D. Stevenson, M.D.
`Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation
`La Jolla, Calif.
`
`Timothy J. Sullivan, M.D.
`University of Texas
`Health Sciences Center
`Dallas, Texas
`
`Eng M. Tan, M.D.
`W. M. Keck Foundation and
`Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation
`La Jolla, Calif.
`
`

`

`THE JOURNAL OF
`
`ALLERGY
`CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
`
`AND
`
`VOLUME 74
`
`MOSBY -
`
`Copyright © 1984 by The C. V. Mosby Company
`
`NUMBER 4
`PART2
`
`CONTENTS
`October, 1984
`
`Foreword
`
`Robert A. Goldstein. M.D., Ph.D .. Berhesdt1, Md.
`
`Introductory remarks
`
`J. Micht1el McGinnis. M.D .. Washi1tgron, D.C.
`Paa/ D. Parkman, M.D .. Bethesda, Md.
`Richard M . Krause. M.D .. At/all/a, Ga.
`
`549
`
`551
`552
`553
`
`Contents continued on page 4A
`
`Vol. 74. No. 4 , Part 2, October, 1984. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL it,!MUNOLOGY is published monthly by The C . V. Mosby
`Company, 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, Mo. 63146. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The C. V. Mosby Co., 11830
`Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, Mo. 63146.
`
`1985 Annual subscription rates
`
`U.S .A.
`
`lnternatioMI
`(surface mail)
`All regions
`
`l111ernariona/
`(airmail)•
`
`Region I
`
`Region 2
`
`Region 3
`
`$75.00
`$40.00
`$32.00
`
`lnstitutionalt
`Individual+
`Student, resident+
`
`$93.50
`$1 12.50
`$13-3.65
`$173.25
`$58.50
`$ 77.50
`$ 98.65
`$119.75
`$50.50
`$ 69.50
`$ 90.65
`$1 11.75
`Single copies are $5.00. Remittances should be made by check, draft, or post office or express money order, in U.S. funds, drawn through a
`U.S. bank, payable to this 1oURNAL.
`•Airmail breakdown - Domestic: First-class and Priority rates for the U.S. and possessions are available upon request. Region /: Central
`America, islands, and mainland colonies of European countries in The ~ricas. Region 2: South America, Europe, Egyp(, Africa (bordering
`the Mediterranean). Region 3: Asia. Australasia, Africa (other than Mediterranean), Middle East, Far East, The Pacific. U.S.S.R . (and
`constituent Republics).
`tlnstitutional (multiple-reader) subscriptions are available to public and private libraries, schools, hospitals, and clinics; city, county, state,
`provincial, and national government bureaus and departments; and all commercial and private institutions and organizations.
`+Individual subscriptions and all student-rate subscriptions must be in the names of, billed to, and paid by individuals. All student-rate requests
`must indicate training status and name of institution.
`Subscriptions may begin at any time.
`Second-class postage paid at St. Louis, Mo. and additional mailing offices. Printed in the U.S.A. Copyright © 1984 by The C . V. Mosby
`Company.
`
`October, 1984
`
`Page 3A
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`CONTINUED
`
`Adverse drug reactions: The.magnitude of the problem
`
`555
`
`Hershel l ick, M .D ., Waltham, Mass.
`
`Clinical spectrum of allergic and pseudoallergic drug reactions
`
`558
`
`Kenneth P. Mathews, M.D., Ann Arbor, Mich.
`
`Risk factors for drug allergy
`
`N. Franklin Adkinson, Jr .. M .D ., Baltimore, Md.
`
`Drug-induced skin disease
`
`Allen P. Kaplan , M .D., Stony Brook, N .Y.
`
`Management of adverse drug reactions
`
`Alben L . Sheffer, M .D., and Doris S. Pennoyer, M .D ., Boston, Mass.
`
`Penicillin allergy
`
`Dorothy D. Sogn, M .D., Bethesda , Md.
`
`Allergic reactions to antimicrobial agents: A review of reactions to
`drugs not in the beta lactam antibiotic class
`
`Timothy J. Sullivan, M .D., Dallas, Texas
`
`Contrast media reactions
`
`Paul A. Greenberger , M.D., Chicago, Ill.
`
`Skin testing and incremental challenge in the evaluation of adverse
`reactions to local anesthetics
`
`Michael Schatz, M .D., San Diego, Calif.
`
`Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of adverse reactions to
`aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
`
`Donald D. Ste venson , M .D., La Jolla, Calif.
`
`Adverse reactions to drug additives
`
`Ronald A . Simon. M .D ., La Jolla , Calif.
`
`Autoallergic reactions induced by procainamide
`
`Eng M . Tan, M.D., and Robert L. Rubin, Ph .D., La Jolla, Calif.
`
`567
`
`573
`
`580
`
`589
`
`594
`
`600
`
`606
`
`617
`
`623
`
`631
`
`Page 4A
`
`October, 1984
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`CONTINUED
`
`Proteins: Chymopapain and insulin
`
`Leslie C. Grammer, M.D., and Roy Patterson, M.D., Chicago, Ill.
`
`Early recognition of allergic reactions to new drugs
`
`Roy Patterson, M.D. , Chicago, Ill.
`
`Summary
`
`635
`
`641
`
`643
`
`Robert A. Goldstein, M.D., Ph .D., and Roy Patterson, M.D., Bethesda. Md .. and Chicago, 1/1.
`
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by The C. V.
`Mosby Company for libraries and other users ~gistercd with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service,
`provided that 104' per page is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress St., Salem, MA 01970; phone (617) 744-3350. The U.S. Government
`~tains a nonexclusive, royalty-f= license in and to any copyright on articles authored by government employees. 0091-6749/ 84
`$00.00 + 10.
`
`October, 1984
`
`Page 5A
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Risk factors for drug allergy
`
`N. Franklin Adkinson, Jr., M.D. Baltimore, Md.
`
`Judging from available data on penicillin allergy there appear to be multiple definable risk
`factors for drugcinduced immunopathology. The induction of a drug-specific immune response
`can be influenced by the age of the patient; underlying genetic or metabolic factors, which may
`restrict ability to initiate a drug-specific immune re.1ponse; the chemical properties of the drug,
`largely its protein reactivity; and the dose and duration of treatment as well as the route of drug
`administration. The elicitation of drug-induced immunopathology is a function of the persistence
`of a drug-.1pecific immune response: the frequency of drug treatmelll and its dose and duration ;
`and probable constitutional factors that may determine in an importalll way the efficiency with
`which a drug-specific immune response can be translated illlo a systemic allergic reaction .
`(J ALLERGY CUN IMMUNOL 74 :567, /984 .)
`
`Even with highly sensitizing drugs, only a small
`percentage of patients with multiple drug exposures
`develop adverse reactions that can be attributed to a
`drug-specific immune response. In a large population
`of clinic patients with sexually transmitted disease in
`Baltimore, we have prospectively observed more than
`8000 patients for evidence of allergic reactions after
`penicillin treatment. In that setting we found an in(cid:173)
`cidence of posttreatment "allergic" reactions of only
`1.45% among unselected patients without histories of
`prior penicillin allergy. What factors contribute to the
`risk of these unusual allergic reactions to drugs? This
`article attempts to address this clinically important
`question. Most of what we know regarding risk factors
`for drug allergy has been derived from studies of al(cid:173)
`lergy to the penicillin group of drugs-far and away
`the most prevalent cause of allergic drug reactions.
`The principles involved in penicillin allergy will hope(cid:173)
`fully be applicable to other allergenic drugs as well.
`Some influences worthy of consideration are listed
`in Table I. It is useful to separate, insofar as possible,
`effects on the induction of a drug-specific immune
`response from those contributing to the elicitation of
`a clinically overt reaction in a previously sensitized
`subject. The table indicates my rather crude assess(cid:173)
`ment of the likelihood that each of seven factors will
`influence the induction or elicitation p~ases of drug
`allergy. The terms "likely" and "unlikely" have been
`
`From the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine at the Good
`Samaritan Hospital , Baltimore, Md.
`Reprint requests: N. Franklin Adkinson, Jr. , M.D., Johns Hopkins
`University School of Medicine at The Good Samaritan Hospital,
`5601 Lock Raven Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21239.
`
`chosen rather than the more concrete "yes" or "no"
`to emphasize the fact that in almost all cases the con(cid:173)
`clusions to be drawn are soft and are drawn from
`limited data and often indirect observations. Unfor(cid:173)
`tunately few attempts have been made to definitively
`assess the quantitative effects of the patient and treat(cid:173)
`ment variables about to be discussed .
`A good illustration of this point is the first relevant
`patient factor-age . Age is judged "likely" to exert
`a significant influence on the induction of drug allergy
`largely because of two clinical observations. First, it
`is generally agreed (without much firm supportive
`data) that pediatric populations suffer fewer allergic
`reactions to penicillin than adults who receive com(cid:173)
`parable doses . 1 Younger age is likely to be associated
`with less cumulative drug exposure, and the contri(cid:173)
`bution of this factor has not been sorted out. Second,
`there is evidence from studies of Hymenoptera allergy
`that immunoglobulin (lg) E antibody responses in chil(cid:173)
`dren, as assessed by skin or radioallergosorbent tests,
`dissipate more rapidly than those of adults. 2 This may
`be true for drug-specific lgE as well, although one
`cross-sectional analysis did not support this notion .3
`There are unfortunately no prospective studies in chil(cid:173)
`dren of the prevalence of penicilloyl lgE antibody
`responses or their rate of disappearance.
`Similarly, age is judged "unlikely" to have a major
`effect on the elicitation of drug allergy solely on the
`grounds that severe drug-induced immunopathology
`can and does occur in small children. After the neo(cid:173)
`natal period, there is little evidence to suggest that
`children lack any of the mechanisms of immunopa(cid:173)
`thology observed in adults . The possibility of a quan(cid:173)
`titative distinction remains . This is clearly an area
`
`567
`
`

`

`588 Adkinson
`
`J. ALLERGY CUN. IMMUNOL
`OCTOBER 1984
`
`TABLE I. Personal and treatment factors contributing to drug-induced immunopathology
`
`Personal factors
`I. Age
`2 . Genetic/constitutional factors
`a. Specific immune responsiveness
`b. Atopy (re: IgE mediation)
`3. Persistence of immune response
`Treatment factors
`I. Chemical properties of drug
`2. Dose, duration of treatment
`3. Route of drug administration
`4 . Frequency of drug treatment
`
`Influence on
`
`Induction of
`drug-specific
`immune response
`
`Ellcltatlon of
`dlnlcally overt
`reaction
`
`Likely
`
`Likely
`Unlikely
`
`Likely
`Likely
`Likely
`Unlikely
`
`Unlikely
`
`Likely
`Likely
`
`Likely
`Likely
`Not clear
`Likely
`
`where additional age-related research is needed, not
`only with regard to the genesis of drug allergy, but
`concerning the expression of immunopathologic re(cid:173)
`actions in general.
`Several constitutional or genetic factors are likely
`to be important detenninants of drug allergy. Exper(cid:173)
`imental studies in animals have indicated a genetic
`basis for the ability to respond immunologically to a
`variety of haptens and low-molecular-weight poly(cid:173)
`mers. •-6 To pursue this hypothesis in man, we have
`studied the IgG and lgE antibody responses after ad(cid:173)
`ministration of penicillin to 60 hospitalized patients
`who received at least 2 gm for 10 or more days. The
`antibody response specific for the major penicilloyl
`9 Eighteen
`detenninant was determined serologically. 7
`-
`percent of the patients made IgG alone, 20% made
`both IgG and IgE, but a majority mounted no de(cid:173)
`tectable serologic response. These data suggest that
`only about half of the adult population can respond
`to penicillin administration with a detectable lgG or
`IgE antibody response. There are of course numerous
`possible explanations for apparent nonresponsiveness
`to high-dose penicillin administration. 10 Whatever the
`ultimate explanation, however, it is reasonable to ex(cid:173)
`pect that nonresponders will have substantially re(cid:173)
`duced risk of not only lgE-mediated allergy but other
`immunologic reactions to penicillin as well.
`Another genetic constellation worthy of consider(cid:173)
`ation with regard to IgE-dependent drug reactions is
`the constitutional diathesis that has traditionally been
`called "atopy." The atopic disposition carries with it
`a higher than expected incidence of allergic rhinitis,
`allergic asthma (usually with onset in childhood), and/
`
`or atopic dermatitis. A useful marker of the atopic
`state-is an elevated total serum IgE. 11
`There are two lines of evidence to support the as(cid:173)
`sertion that atopy has little effect on the induction of
`a drug-specific IgE response. First, we did not observe
`any difference in the total serum lgE levels of the IgE
`responders and nonresponders in the study of peni(cid:173)
`cilloyl immune responsiveness mentioned above.*
`The second observation pertinent to this point con(cid:173)
`cerns the rates of clinically assessed atopy as indicated
`by responses to questions regarding prior history of
`seasonal rhinitis, allergic asthma, or atopic dermatitis
`among 4069 patients who were skin tested for peni(cid:173)
`cillin allergy. All patients had negative histories of
`penicillin allergy and were skin tested with penicilloyl
`polylysine and a minor detenninant penicillin mixture.
`Use of these two reagents is thought to be sufficient
`to detect most of the clinically important IgE antibody
`16 The results in(cid:173)
`12
`responses to penicillin antigens. 3·
`-
`dicate that there is no difference in the frequency of
`atopy by history in skin test- positive as opposed to
`skin test- negative subjects (Fig. I). These findings
`are compatible with the suggestion that an atopic back(cid:173)
`ground does not predispose to a higher rate of drug(cid:173)
`specific lgE antibody responses.
`On the other hand, an atopic background is found
`with a high frequency among patients suffering severe
`18 It even appears
`and fatal anaphylactic reactions. 17
`•
`that atopic individuals are at greater risk for serious
`pseudoallergic reactions such as those to contrast me(cid:173)
`dia where lgE-dependent mechanisms are not in-
`
`* Adkinson NF, Wheeler B: Unpubli~hed data.
`
`

`

`VOI.UME74
`NUMBER 4, PART 2
`
`Risk factors for drug allergy 589
`
`TABLE II. lgE-dependent reactions among
`patients with negative penicillin skin tests
`
`History of prior
`reaction
`
`Anaphylaxis
`Urticaria
`Exanthem
`Other/uncertain
`None
`
`Rate of lgE-dependent
`reactions after
`treatment• 1%)
`
`15.4t (2/ 13)
`1.si (15/192)
`2.4§ (3/ 126)
`0.5 (1/202)
`0.45 ( 18/3996)
`
`*During first 72 hours of treatment. Of the 21 reactions among
`history-positive patients, 16 involved transient urticaria! reac(cid:173)
`tions, three cases included angioedema, and three cases mani(cid:173)
`fested mild dyspnea and/or dysphagia. There were no cardio(cid:173)
`vascular alterations in any case.
`tp = 0.002.
`tp < 0.0001.
`§p = 0 .049.
`
`volved. 19 Whatever its basis, the atopic constitution
`appears to carry with it a substantially increased risk
`of serious allergic reactions once an lgE antibody re(cid:173)
`sponse has been mounted.
`Genetic or . constitutional factors other than atopy
`may also play a role in the elicitation of IgE-dependent
`reactions. We have recently obtained data that support
`the concept that a conglomeration of patient factors
`relating to an individual 's ability to translate an lgE
`antibody response into a clinically manifested allergic
`reaction may constitute an important risk factor. As
`part of a prospective, randomized study of penicillin
`skin testing, we treated and observed for reaction 3996
`patients with negative histories of prior penicillin reac(cid:173)
`tivity and negative penicillin skin tests. Among these
`patients, 18 had reactions within the first 72 hours of
`therapy that were judged on clinical grounds to be
`probably IgE mediated. This translates to an IgE-de(cid:173)
`pendent reaction rate of 0.45% among history-nega(cid:173)
`tive, skin test- negative subjects. In the same clinical
`population, we also skin tested and treated 533 in(cid:173)
`dividuals with histories of prior penicillin reactions,
`but whose penicillin skin tests were currently shown
`to be unambiguously negative. The observed 72-hour
`reactions rates for probable IgE-mediated reactions arc
`as shown in Table II. The important observation here
`is that the rates for probable IgE-mediated reactions
`were significantly higher among patients with histories
`of urticaria and anaphylaxis than among patients with
`histories of other penicillin allergy or with negative
`histories.
`It is important to recall that all of the patients in
`the first two categories had previously sustained prob-
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`>, ! 20
`I us
`
`l.
`
`10
`
`5
`
`N•Ttl
`
`N•
`3994
`
`Polttlve
`PENICILLIN SKIN TESTS
`
`FIG. 1. Frequency of atopy among 4069 subjects skin test(cid:173)
`ed for penicillin allergy. Subjects were randomly selected
`from clinic patients with sexually transmitted disease who
`required penicillin therapy for an active infection. All sub(cid:173)
`jects denied prior penicillin reaction. Atopy was deter(cid:173)
`mined by any positive response to questions regarding
`personal history of allergic asthma, seasonal rhinitis, and/
`or atopic dermatitis. The rate of atopy did not differ be(cid:173)
`tween skin test-positive and skin test-negative subjects
`(p = 0.78; Fisher's exact test).
`
`able lgE-mediated reactions and had unequivocally
`negative penicillin skin tests prior to their treatment.
`Hence, their reactions must be presumed due to very
`small amounts of lgE antibodies that are undetectable
`by standard skin testing techniques. While such a
`small amount of drug-specific antibody may be of no
`clinical consequence for most patients, it appears to
`be capable of mediating urticaria) and anaphylactic
`reactions more readily in patients who have sustained
`such reactions in the past. It may be that some or all
`of these reactions in skin test- negative patients are
`not lgE dependent, but are pseudoallergic or idiosyn(cid:173)
`cratic in origin. Nevertheless, the fact remains that
`patients who previously sustained anaphylactic or ur(cid:173)
`ticaria) reactions to penicillin are at greater risk for
`recurrence of such reactions if they arc retreated(cid:173)
`even when IgE antibodies are undetectable by skin
`testing. The relationship of this constitutional risk fac(cid:173)
`tor to atopy, as classically defined, remains to be de(cid:173)
`termined.
`A third factor that clearly influences the cumulative
`risk of penicillin allergy is the persistence of drug(cid:173)
`specific antibodies once they are formed . We are con(cid:173)
`ducting an ongoin~ study to assess prospectively the
`
`

`

`(:3 Procaine P9nicillin (N•2988)
`(3.00 IM)
`0 Amplclllln (N•820)
`(3.50 P.OJ
`E1'Jllenzathine l'llniclllin (N■ l79)
`(1.50 IM)
`
`570 Adkinson
`
`100
`
`80
`
`20
`
`loE Mediated
`
`Probably
`lmmunolo0ic
`
`Al I
`
`FIG. 2. Comparison of reaction rates for three penicillin
`treatment regimens. All subjects gave negative histories
`of prior penicillin reactions; none were skin tested prior
`to treatment. Treatment regimens were chosen on clinical
`grounds, independently of study. Reactions within 72
`hours of initiation of treatment were designated on clinical
`criteria to be lgE mediated (urticaria, anaphylaxis). The
`" probably immunologic" category included lgE-mediated
`reactions, plus pruritus and/or nonurticarial skin erup(cid:173)
`tions. The " all" category included reactions of any type
`attributed by the patient to penicillin treatment. In all three
`categories, the reaction rates for oral ampicillin and pro(cid:173)
`caine penicillin did not differ by chi-square analysis
`(p = 0.23 to 0.89), while that for bicillin was significantly
`higher (p = 0.003 to 0.01 ).
`
`natural history of penicillin allergy in man. This in(cid:173)
`volves the periodic longitudinal follow-up of patients
`who have positive penicillin skin tests. More than 50
`such patients are currently being evaluated with rou(cid:173)
`tine penicillin skin tests and serologic determinations
`of penicilloyl IgG and lgE antibodies every 6 to 8
`weeks. Although the study is incomplete, available
`data indicate that the penicilloyl IgE antibody half(cid:173)
`life in serum ranges from as short as 10 days to an
`indeterminantly long interval (> 1000 days). The rate
`of decline of penicillin antibodies cannot as yet be
`related to any clinical or immunologic parameters,
`including the recentness of penicillin therapy, anti(cid:173)
`body titer at entry, or the patient's history of prior
`penicillin reaction. Furthermore, the half-life of pen(cid:173)
`icilloyl IgE antibody is not significantly correlated
`with the half-life of IgE tetanus antibody in the same
`patients. This finding suggests that the persistence of
`penicilloyl IgE antibodies depends on some factors
`
`J. ALLERGY CUN. IMMUNOL.
`OCTOBER 1984
`
`that are independent of those controlling the metab(cid:173)
`olism of IgE antibodies in general. Further study will
`be needed to determine what these host factors are
`and the role, if any, of occult exposure to penicillin
`or cross-reacting antigens in the environment. It is
`obvious, however, that whatever the reason, the per(cid:173)
`sistence of IgE antibody over long periods of time
`carries with it a cumulative risk of penicillin allergy
`much greater than that experienced by patients whose
`drug-specific antibody levels decline rapidly.
`There are at least four treatment-related factors that
`may influence the rate of induction and/or elicitation
`of allergic drug reactions. The first of these is the
`chemical properties of the drug. We now know quite
`conclusively from multiple lines of evidence that this
`is a pivotal determinant of drug allergies, with a strong
`influence on both the induction of a drug-specific im(cid:173)
`mune response and the subsequent elicitation of im(cid:173)
`munopathology. In work by Herman Eisen20 and his
`colleagues in the early 1950s , the rate of contact sen(cid:173)
`sitization by simple chemicals was found to be directly
`related to the rate of conjugation of those chemicals
`to large-molecular-weight carriers, usually proteins.
`This concept has now achieved the status of immu(cid:173)
`nologic dogma. In general this principle has been
`borne out clinically. Highly allergenic drugs invari(cid:173)
`ably have significant protein reactivity, and those
`drugs that are relatively inert with regard to protein
`interactions enjoy a very low incidence of allergic side
`effects. 2 1. 22
`The numerous ways in which penicillin can interact
`covalently with proteins has been well worked out
`thanks to a decade of pioneering work by Drs. Charles
`20 It
`Parker and Bernard Levine and their associates. 21

`should be pointed out that the covalent attachment of
`penicillin to proteins occurs at a measurable rate under
`physiologic conditions without the need for enzyme,
`28 Hence, it is possible to detect pen(cid:173)
`or cofactors. 27

`icilloated proteins in the serum of nearly every patient
`receiving moderate doses of penicillin drugs.* Thus
`the failure to observe a penicilloyl immune response
`in a patient on long-term penicillin therapy is not likely
`to be explained by the patient's inability to produci.:
`drug protein conjugates. This situation with penicillin
`stands in contrast to that of other drugs such as iso(cid:173)
`niazid and hydralazine where a genetically determined
`capacity to acetylate the drug may contribute to its
`immunogenicity in some patients. 22
`29

`The dose and duration of drug treatment are likely,
`within limits, to affect the induction of a drug-specifiL(cid:173)
`immune response. Evidence of this comes largely
`
`• Adkinson NF. Wheeler B: Unpublished data.
`
`

`

`YOLUME 1,
`NUMBER 4, PART 2
`
`Risk factors for drug allergy 571
`
`12
`
`•
`
`1
`
`•
`
`35
`
`from studies in experimental animals. The dose and
`duration of drug treatment may also influence the elic(cid:173)
`itation of immunopathology. For example, drug-in(cid:173)
`duced cytopenias, interstitial nephritis, and serum
`sickness reactions occur more frequently with higher(cid:173)
`dose, longer-term therapy. J0.
`32 Even lgE-dependent re(cid:173)
`actions are dose related; anecdotal cases are reported
`in which patients tolerate a given level of treatment,
`but manifest acute allergic reactions when the dose is
`increased. 33 Furthermore, the duration of treatment
`defines the temporal period of risk and thereby influ(cid:173)
`ences immunopathology independent of any effect it
`may have on immune responsiveness.
`Another risk factor is the route of drug administra(cid:173)
`tion. Regarding the induction phase, the use of topical
`penicillin has been largely abandoned due in large
`part to the high rate of contact sensitization observed
`during its early use in toothpastes and mouthwashes
`in Europe. 17 Otherwise there is little evidence that the
`risk of sensitization is greater for one route of treat(cid:173)
`ment than for another.
`Two clinical surveys have found that penicillin re(cid:173)
`actions were elicited almost twice as often with par(cid:173)
`enteral administration as with oral administration. 34
`In reviewing the world literature, Sullivan et al. 33 not(cid:173)
`ed that each year only six anaphylactic deaths occurred
`after oral administration of 13-lactam drugs compared
`ID hundreds of penicillin-induced fatalities after par(cid:173)
`enteral administration. However, our recent experi(cid:173)
`ence suggests that with careful follow-up, reaction
`rates for similar doses of oral and parenteral penicillin
`may be comparable.
`Fig. 2 shows results from a prospective treatment
`protocol in which three treatment regimens were com(cid:173)
`pared: procaine penicillin, 3 gm intramuscularly; am(cid:173)
`picillin, 3.5 gm orally as a single dose; and benzathine
`penicillin, 1.5 gm intramuscularly. One gram of pro(cid:173)
`benecid was given orally along with the parenteral
`procaine penicillin and the oral ampicillin. Reactions
`occurring within 72 hours of penicillin treatment were
`documented. Results are similar for all reported re(cid:173)
`actions, those judged of probable immunologic origin
`and those judged clinically to be likely lgE mediated.
`In each case there is no difference in the reaction rate
`observed with comparable doses of procaine penicillin
`Ind orally administered ampicillin. The reaction rates
`for benzathine penicillin were significantly higher, de(cid:173)
`spite its lower dose, suggesting that the benzathine
`additive is responsible for the excess reaction rate.
`This finding of a higher reaction rate for benzathine
`penicillin and other depo-type penicillins is in agree(cid:173)
`men with other available studies. 36
`This failure to demonstrate an increased reaction
`

`
`rate for intramuscular procaine penicillin could be due
`to the excess rate of reactions associated with ampi(cid:173)
`cillin as opposed to benzylpenicillin, or to the use of
`probenecid to boost serum levels. Nevertheless, these
`results raise the question of whether the reported dif(cid:173)
`ferences in reaction rates for oral versus parenteral
`penicillin may not be due more likely to a difference
`in usual dose than the route of administration.
`Finally, there is little evidence that the frequency
`of drug treatment affects the likelihood of sensitiza(cid:173)
`tion. On the other hand, the frequency of drug usage
`has a marked influence on the likelihood of eliciting
`an allergic reaction. In the case of IgE-dependent pen(cid:173)
`icillin allergy, most patients lose their lgE antibody
`and hence their sensitivity over a finite period of
`time.' · 10
`• Thus, the more frequently the drug is
`administered, the more likely that an IgE-dependent
`reaction will be provoked. By analogy, this may also
`apply to other forms of drug-induced immunopath(cid:173)
`ology.
`It should be clear from the tentative nature of all
`of the conclusions drawn that much important work
`has yet to be undertaken. In considering future re(cid:173)
`search directions, an emphasis on patient-related vari(cid:173)
`ables rather than the treatment-related factors is to be
`desired. This is because drug allergy is rare enough
`that treatment-related risk factors are unlikely to have
`a significant impact on the way we use drugs clini(cid:173)
`cally-that is, on the dose, duration, route, and fre(cid:173)
`quency of prescribed drug therapy. An exception to
`this generalization would be knowledge of the chem(cid:173)
`ical properties of a drug, particularly its protein reac(cid:173)
`tivity, since such information may impact on drug
`design and premarket estimates of allergenic potential.
`On the other hand, patient-related factors are of im(cid:173)
`mense practical importance since they may identify
`individuals who have generally increased risk for mul(cid:173)
`tiple allergic drug reactions or for multiple types of
`immunopathology. In the case of penicillin allergy,
`for example, if high-risk patient subsets can be iden(cid:173)
`tified, then routine penicillin skin testing before treat(cid:173)
`ment can be made vastly more cost-effective.
`Since drug-specific immune responses occur much
`more frequently than drug-induced immunopathology,
`attention should be focused on the patient factors that
`are responsible for translating a drug-specific immune
`response into an allergic reaction. These factors need
`to be delineated and quantified. As concerns drugs
`whose prevalence of use or reaction rates are less than
`for 13-lactam antibiotics, collaborative research efforts
`involving laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic stud(cid:173)
`ies will be necessary for findings to be conclusive.
`Such studies are likely to be successful only if un-
`
`

`

`572 Adkinson
`
`J. ALLERGY CUN. IMMUNOL.
`OCTOBER 1984
`
`dertaken as a joint venture involving interested in(cid:173)
`vestigators, federal agencies, and the pharmaceutical
`industry.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I. Berkowitz M, Glaser J, Johnstone DE: The incidence of allergy
`to drugs in pediatric practice. Ann Allergy 11:561, 1953
`2. Sch

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket