throbber

`
`Fanaa,
`
`
`
`
`y Brinker
`
`
`
`
`
`
`erankfurt ani Main, Germany
`
` rE Evans
`Nesdé Research Center, Sernpt-
`
`
`stitulion of Chemie:
`thal, Switzerland
`Knaineers, Rugby, Great Britain
`
`Gremn
`
`cal University of Munich,
`Preising- Woihensieplian,
`CGeornany
`
`
`
`Lurgi AJe
`Germany
` gory
`
`ephanopoulos
`Chusetis Institute of
`
`
`y, Cambridye MA USA
`
`
`
`BASF Akticngesclischaft,
`Ludwigshafon.
`
`
`
`Apa
`
`
`
`
`
`Yt
`Chenetall Gabe, Frankfurt am
`Main. Germany
`
`Wolfgang A. Herrmann
`
`hnieal Cniversity of Munien,
`Garehing rl ALY
`Vilneim Keim
`
`RWTH Aachen,
`4
`Lachen,
`Germany
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chemical Industry fistitute
`
`acolory, Albuquerque, NM
`
`
` dolmsen a
`Brunswick. SJ US.4&
`
`Mitchell
`
`
`ell Laboratories,Murray Hall
`REUSA
`
`t
`
`Alia Mitsute
`
`1
`
`
`Mippon ©
`atoch Consulfing,
`Takarazuka, Japan
`
`
`
` C
`
`ation, Fokve. Japan
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 1
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`Sixth, Completely Revised Edition
`
`Volume 10
`
`|
`
`Cyrogenic Technology
`to
`Dithiocarbamic Acid
`and Derivatives
`
`WW)WILEY-VCH
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 2
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 2
`
`

`

` DS AES
`
`
`Numerical data, descriptions of meihods or equipment,
`and other information presented in this book have
`beencarefully checked ofaccuracy. Nevertheless,
`authors and publisher do nol assume anyliability for
`misprints, faulty statements, or other kinds of errors.
`Persons intending to handle chemicals or to work
`according to informationderived from this beok are
`advised to consult the original sourcesas well as
`relevant regulations in orderto avoid possible hazards.
`
`Library of Congress Card No.: Appliedfor.
`
`British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data:
`A catalogue record forthis book is available fromthe
`British Library.
`
`Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche
`Bibliothek.
`Die Deutsche Bibliotheklists this publication in the
`Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic
`datais available in the Internet at <http://dnb.ddb.de>.
`
`
`
`ISBN 3-527-30385-5
`
`© 2003 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Ca, KGaA,
`Weinheim.
`
`Printed on acid-free paper.
`
`The paper usedcorresponds to both the U.S.standard
`ANST 2.39.48 ~ 1984
`and the European standard [ISO TC46.
`
`All rights reserved (including those of translation into
`other languages). Nopart of this book may be repro-
`duced in any form ~ by photoprinting, microfilm, or any
`other means ~ nortransmittedor translated into a
`machine language without written permission from the
`publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in
`this book, even when not specifically markedas such are
`not to be considered unprotected bylaw.
`
`Cover Design: Gunther Schulz, Fussg$nheim
`Composition: Sieingraeber Satztechnik GmbH,
`Dossenheim
`Printing: Strauss Offsetdruck GmbH, Mérlenbach
`Bookbinding:Litges & Dopf Buchbinderei GmbH,
`Heppenheim
`
`Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany
`
`t£
`|étt
`
`
`
`
`EEE
`cima
`EES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 3
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`extra
`
`ARTHONY N. bE BeLoer, PdConsulta
`
`
`
`
`
`sala, Sweden
`
`Bs
` Ori
`
`
`
`Storage 2... ee 438
`&
`Uses oo... 0... ee. 43s
`&
`6.1. CHimical Products 000.00 0000000. 438
`6.2. General Uses
`o. 0.0000 0..0500.. 439
`
`EKconomic Aspects 2. ....0.0.0000.. 439
`7.
`o
`8
`Toxicology .. 00.0.0 .000004..
`
`References 0.0.0.0 .000..0..000.. 4a
`.
`
`chemical, and biological reports have therefore
`
`focused on this dextran. Uniess otherwise stated,
`the discussions in this article are concerned only
`with B-S12 1"). Figurel shows its structure.
`
`2. Structure, Chemical, and
`Physicochemical Properties
`
`2.1. Structure
`
`The dextran elaborated by Leuconostoc mesen-
`teroides NRRL 8-512(F} consists of
`an
`c(U—-+ 6)-Linked glucan with side chains at-
`tached to the 3-positions of the backbone giu-
`cose units. Fromperiodate and methylation anal-
`yses, the degree of branching is estimated to be
`5 %. Upon hydrolysis,
`the degree of branch-
`ing is foundto decrease slightly with decreasing
`molecular mass.
`The 'H- and '°C-NMR spectra afford com-
`pelling evidence for the main structural fea-
`tures of dextran [9]. The degree of branching
`of clinical dextrans as determined by '*C-NMR
`is 4.0-~6.0 %,
`Many details of the fine structure are unre-
`solved, in particular the length and distribution
`of the side chains. LARM and colleagues con-
`cluded that 40 %of the side chains are one
`unit long, 45 % are two units long, and there-
`maining 15 % are still longer [10]. The pre-
`ponderance of single unit branches in several
`other dextrans, Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-
`{375, B-1415, and B-/41]6, has been established
`
`introduction 2.00.00 0.0... ....0.04 435
`
`Structure, Chemical, anc
`Physicochemical Properties ©... 0... . 435
`Structure . 00 eee 435
`Physicochemical Properties .. 0... .
`. 436
`Reactivity 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0000. 437
`Production o....000........... 437
`
`
`
` j
`
`2.
`
`.. 0.000.000 .0.000. 437
`3.4. Biosynthesis
`32, Production of Clinical Dextran
`..... 437
`
`L. introduction
`
`The term dextran [9004-54-0] refers to those
`polysaccharides which are composed primarily
`of | > 6 linked a-p-glucopyranose units. Many
`dextrans contain branches attached to C-2, C-3,
`or C-4. Others may also contain | — 3 linkages
`in the main chain.
`The formation ofslimes andjellies duringthe
`processing of wines and in sugar refining has
`
`ong been an undesirable complication. In the
`middie of the 19th century, reports by PASTEUR
`[lland Van Trecitem[2] implicated a bacterial
`
`mechanism. The name dextran appears to have
`been assigned ca. 1870 by SCHEIBLER |3[, who
`also established that dextran was a polymer of
`glucose. Further references to the early history
`of dextran are available [4].
`Dextrans are synthesized from sucrose by a
`large numberoforganisms. JEANES and cowork-
`ers have characterized over 96 strains of dextran-
`producing bacteria [5]. These bacteria are con-
`fmed to the family Lactobacillaceae and in par-
`ticular to the genera Lactobacillus, Leucanos-
`toc, and Streptococcus. Several members of the
`Streptococcus group are implicated in the devel-
`opment of cariogenic plaque on tooth surfaces
`iS], [7].
`Leuconostoc and Lactobacillus dextrans are
`also undesirable contaminants in the sugarrefin-
`ing industry, in which they adverscly affect the
`filterability and crystallization of sucrose [8].
`Only the slightly branched dextran from Leu-
`conostoc mesenteroides B-512(F) is of com-
`mercial interest. Most of the chemical, physico-
`
`t r
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 4
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
` -
`
`aeoe“
`ot-
`
`:
`
`aea“a
`
`bdneendnbs dalnnratitinemnnietnnneernntamrntareabuadntinbababemnoemnseenrinbaneneernbaernmnbunnciindenbsnmuteds
`40°
`we
`we
`Moon
`
`Vignre 2. Log-log plot of intrinsic viscosity [77]
`mass-average molecular mass My for dextran B-
`
`and for a hypothetical linear dextran (b)
`
`
`
`against
`5L2 fay
`
`
`The of(1->6) linked polysaccnarides re-
`present a class of very flexible and ended
`polymers. Tabic 1] shows the relationship be
`
`ween mass-average molecular mass and the
`dius of gyration, At Ingh molecular masses,
`
`ihe molecules display increased symmetry (131,
`
`
`Table £. Molecular dimensions of dextran B-512(F1 [16]
`
`ms of gyration, am
`
`
`Molecular mass My
`
`2x 108
`5 10°
`bx 19°
`sx 194
`
`(Albumin)
`
`a8
`20
`95
`68
`3.5
`
`conformation. Several attempts have been madc
`
`At M, 2000, the solution Properties are best
`explained byatransition ren a coil to a rodlike
`to crystallize dextran, and CHanzy et al. grew
`single crystals from a dextranfraction havi
`
`19 900 and proposeda ribbon-like conformation
`f18}.
`
` yhty of Gexiranases w:
`
`
`
`roperieshas permitted W,
`
`
`
`cetheseresults pi2i.
`
` ies of the v
`ryaeEVICH
`
`Dextran B-512(F)
`is
`freely soluble in| wa-
`ier, methyl
`sulfoxide,
`formamide, cthylene
`glycol, glycerol, Nor ethylnorpholine-N-oxide,
`Some dextran
`and hexawnmethy!Iphosphoramide,
`
`
`
`n degrce of
`adopted a
`i
`cry:vstallinityand can only be brought inte s<
`
`
`tion by stro
`eating.
`The moleccular mass of hydrolyzed natural
`dextran NRRL B-312(F)is 9x 108 to 510>LO°
`13], [iS].
`IMeasurements ina variety of sol-
`
`
`
`
`s
`(c.g., 4M agueous sodium chloride and
`6M aqueous urea)
`failed to reveal any eidence
`
` t
`
`ofassociation.
`Therelationsnip between the mass-average
`
`molecular mass My, and meintrinsic
`viscosity
`is shown in Penis2 443), (16).
`tamed the viscosity deypendence
`the clinical rannee [i6)
`
`q|
`
`viscosily
`were
`Ll = iotrinsic

`lecular m‘ 8.
`MM, = viscosity-avera
`
`The colloid osmotic pressure of dextran so-
`
`lutions significan
`their plasma volume
`expansion [17].
`
`and
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 5
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
` Reactivity
`
`m2 oSe ct% =
`
`fete Ga}aad
`
`
`
`the reactivity of the
`As with other glucans,
`hydroxyl group at position2 toward alkylat-
`2 agents is higher than at position 3 or posi-
`4. Studies on the partial methylation of dex-
`ion
`
`wan revealed the followingrelative reactivities:
`ko 1 kat kg= 16:2: 7. Migration of the sub-
`stiinents may subject acylations to thermody-
`
`mic control. Thus, although partial acetyla-
`
`of dextran with acetic anhydride — pyridine
`in formamide as solvent gave ko > ky=kz4, the
`reactivities were virtually identical when there-
`
`action was carried out with acetic anhydride in
`aqueous alkali [19].
`
`3. Production
`
`3.1. Biosynthesis
`
`and
`The early work of BeverincK [20]
`HenRE [21] showed that dextran was clabo-
`rated by an extracellular enzyme designated
`dextransucrase (sucrose-!,6-a-D-glucan 6-a-
`
`giucosyltransferase, B.C. 2.4.1.5)
`The dextransucrases from many Leuconostoc
`and Streptococcal strains have been isolated and
`their properties studied. The purified B-512 0)
`enzyme, which binds dextran strongly, rapidly
`loses activity at 4°C and even at — 15 °C. Its ac-
`tivwy decreases by 60 %over 20 d. The enzyme
`can be stabilized by adding dextran (> 4 mg/mL)
`5if,pee
`Dextransucrase appears to be a glycoprotein
`(M@,. 64.000) with mannose being the primary
`sugar, Calcium ions appear to be essential for
`the activity of the enzyme.
`A mechanism for the biosynthesis has been
`proposed whereby the enzyme serves twofunc-
`tions [23]. It first hydrolyzes the sucrose and
`binds the glucosyl moiety, and thereafter it
`builds up the dextran chain byan insertion mech-
`anism (Fig. 3).
`he biosynthesis can be terminated by any
`one of a large number of acceptors, and ifso,
`the dextran chain is released. Examples of ac-
`ceptors are maltose, isomaltose, and methyl-a-
`b-glucoside. Dextranitself can also function as
`an acceptor[24].
`The formation of branches is also an accep-
`tor reaction in which a ring hydroxyl group on
`a dextran molecule is inserted in the growing
`dextran chain.
`
`Figure 3. Two-site mechanismfor the biosynthesis of dex-
`tran chains by dextransucrase
`G-P represents a sucrose molecule composed of glucose(G)
`and tructose (F). G--G represents a (1
`> 6) linked ghicose
`residues. The binding sites X may not pe identical.
`
`3.2. Production of Clinical Dextran
`
`In the West, naost major manufacturers of dex-
`tran employ a process based on the batchwise
`culture of Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-512(F}
`ip the presence of sucrose. The viscous culture
`fluid is precipitated in an alcohol, and the native
`dextran then is hydrolyzed and fractionated to
`the desired molecular mass range. In Japan and
`Eastern European countries, different strains of
`Leuconostoc are used, but the dextrans produced
`are of similar structure. The preparation of dex-
`tran on a laboratory scale has been described in
`letail [25], and the industrial production ofdex-
`tran has been reviewed [26-28].
`To obtain vigorous growth of the organism,
`the culture medium must contain various nutri-
`ents in addiGen to sucrose. In practice, these
`are supplied by addition of cither veast extracts,
`corn steep liquors, or malt extracts with peptone
`or tryptone broth. The pH of the medium af-
`fects both the production of dextransucrase by
`the organism and the activity and stability of the
`enzyme; Figure4 shows the pH changes. The
`influence of sucrose concentration on produc-
`tion of dextran has been reviewed [26]. A su-
`crose concentration of ca. 10 % is satisfactory; at
`higher concentrations the yield of dextran with
`My, >» 5000 decreases. The cultures are main-
`tained al a temperature of ca. 25 °C, al which
`the fermentation is complete after 24 —48 h. Pro-
`longation of the cultures for morc than 48 h may
`lead to a decrease in molecular mass ofthe dex-
`tran.
`
`The native dextran that is obtained ts then
`subjected to partial hydrolysis to form products
`of appropriate molecularsize, and fractionation
`byethanol or methanol to give clinical fractions.
`
`
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 6
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`438
`
`Dextran
`
`Extensive studies on the acid hydrolysis and
`fractionation of native B-512(F) dextran have
`been carried out and conditions for maximal
`yields have been established [29], [30]. Follow-
`ing the partial hydrolysis,
`the clinical fraction
`can be precipitated with 39-46 % aqueous eth-
`anol under careful temperature control (25 °C).
`Membrane technology now often replaces etha-
`nol fractionation in purification operations. The
`product is then redissolved and spray dried.
`
`is now determined by size exclusion chro.
`matography. Other quality parameters are acid.
`ity/alkalinity, nitrogen impurities, residual sol-
`vents, heavy metals, sulfated ash, bacterial en-
`dotoxins, and microbial contamination.
`
`5. Storage
`
`Dextran is stable indefinitely whenstored in the
`absence of light, excessive heat, and moisture.
`Sterile solutions ofclinical dextrans with pH
`4-7 have excellent chemical stability (at least
`{0 years) when stored at 4-40 °C.
`Clinical dexiran solutions tend to form small
`amounts of flakes if kept in glass bottles and
`subjected to considerable temperature fluctua-
`tions. These flakes have been found to consist
`of dextran with the same M, as the substance in
`solution. They redissolve upon heating.
`
`6. Uses
`
`
`
`Tr 20
`16
`
`ae
`
`|
`
`og
`
`Dextran
`Cyetommemannrmnne6
`
`iWe
`2
`
`ined
`
`
`93
`6B bE Sf
`78
`ee er ompH
`So
`
`c
`324
`22 ot +tJ ge
`Time, days - Bion
`
`al
`» ibe
`ne
`a |
`3 ce 4
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Sucrose
`
`Figure 4, Changes in sucrose concentration, pH, and dex-
`tran concentration during the fermentation of Leuconostoc
`mesenteroides
`
`6.1. Clinical Products
`
`3.3. Future Trends
`
`Several alternative processes have been devised
`over the years:
`
`1) Fermentation with cell-free extracts
`2) Fermentation in the presence of acceptors
`3) Continuous processes
`4) Use of immobilized dextransucrase
`
`About 40years ago, a sapplement(1 mg/mL)
`of low molecular mass dextran was found to
`yield a product dextran of lower molecular mass
`[31]. Few producers have adopted this type of
`process for clinical dextrans. One drawback is
`thai
`il requires a production facility for low
`molecular mass dextran.
`Promising results have been obtained with
`immobilized dextransucrase but only on a labo-
`ratory scale [32].
`
`4. Quality Specifications
`
`Monographs for quality specifications of dex-
`tran40, 60, and 70 substance have been pub-
`lished in the European Pharmacopoeia and for
`dextran40 and 706 in USP. The molecular size
`
`Dextran 70 (M7. ca. 70000) is marketed in most
`countries as a 6 %solution in normal saline and,
`as such, represents the plasma volume expander
`of choice. It is one of two plasma volume ex-
`panders included in the WHO list of essential
`drugs. Clinical experience supports iis use in
`the treatment of shock or impending shock as
`a result of hemorrhage, burns, or surgery. Dex-
`tran 60 has replaced dextran 70 in some parts of
`Europe.
`Dextran 40 (Mf, ca. 40000) was introduced
`in 1961 following studies ofthe erythrocyte. dis-
`aggregating and blood flow improvementprop-
`erties of lower molecular mass dextrans. It
`is
`marketed as a 10 % solution in normal saline
`or 5 % glucose which provides rapid plasma
`volume expansion and promotes microcircula-
`tory blood flow. Both products are used exten-
`sively to prevent fatal pulmonary complications
`of surgery, trauma, and shock. A 6 %solution of
`dextran 70 in a hypertonic saline solution (7.5 %
`Natl) has been shown to be exceptionally effec-
`tive as a plasma volume expander for primary
`(prehospital) resuscitation in severe trauma and
`hemorrhagic shock [33].
`In 1982, the monovalent hapten dextran | (4
`fraction of M,, ca. 1000) was launched as pro-
`phylaxis againstdextran-induced anaphylactoid
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 7
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`an aston-
`
`ommonly adied io infusion and
`
`
`Several microcarriers
`
`ons, for example, in connect
`ni brans-
`
`dextran substituted W
`
`
`;. A dextran sulfate of M,, 7€
`0 and sulfur
`
`
`tient of116%Te WasStesied chinal aS an anti-
`fe8 Cytodex)
`
`
`in rage-c-cepeniden
`
`
`
`
`ed, it caused toxic
`: production
`
`ate with M, ap-
`:
`WX.8009 with in vitro antiviral properties has
`
`=i tested in patients with HIVinfection. The
`‘ ultss were not encouraging[35]. A dieethylami-
`
`noethyl derivative of oye (My ca. 500 000)
`
`
`
`seen foundto beeffectivein reducing serum
`
`usec"widely for
`anemic©pigletsaand‘henans,
`
`1 1977, a cross-linked Gextran in bead form
`Debrisan) was introduced as awound-cleansing
`gent for secreting and infected woundsin par-
`
`
`
`7. Economic Aspects
`
`Exact figures for the annual world production aré
`
`not available butihe size of magnitude would b
`somewnat in excess of SOO C.
`The major producer of dextran is Amersham
`Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden): other
`producers are Meito (lapan), Polfa (Poland)
`Pharmacosmas (Denmark). The maior produc~
`ers of clinical dextran solutions are: Abbott
`(United States), Baxter-Traveno! (Unites States
`and Europe),), Polfa (Poland), Infusia (Czech Re-
`public), Otsuka and Green Cross (Japan),
`FR.
`Braun(Germany) and Pharmalink (Sweden).
`
`8. Toxicology
`
`‘The infusion of chnical dextran solutions in hu-
`mans is now approved by the regulatory au-
`Unorities in most countries. No adverse effects
`are to be expected, provided the recommended
`doses are observed. However, a low incidence
`of dextran-induced anaphylactoid reactions has
`been reported. The risk ofthis type of reactio
`has been virtually eliminated bythe preinjection
`of 20mL of a 15 % dextran 1 (4, ca. 1000) so-
`lution [40].
`Dextran B-512(F) given orally is degraded
`by bacteria m the gut and the products produce a
`rapid increase in bloodsugar and liver glycogen.
`Dextran administered intravenously is degraded
`in the liver to carbon dioxide and water.
`Dextrans arc not permitted as food additives
`mthe United States and Western Furope [41],
`[42], but
`they are considered safe as compo-
`nents of food packing materiais. Dextrans may
`be used as additives in pharmaceutical and cos-
`metic formulations providedthat the necessary
`safety documentation is presented.
`
`€.2, General Us
`
`
`
`Portied dextran fractions are currently used in
`the cosmetic and photographic industries. A
`
`apprehensive bibliography covering dextran
`
`erature and patentsis available [36]. Dextran
` Ta
`ciions find application for partitioning sub-
`cellular particles in two-phase polymer systems
`
`as cryoprotective agents.
`.
`Sephadex gels, prepared by emulsion poly-
`merization of dextran, have occupied a demi-
`nant place among gel filtration media for many
`years. Sephadex G-25 is used on an industrial
`scale for desalting operations during the purifi-
`cation of biopolymers of medical
`importance,
`g., insulin.Manyofthe ion exchangers derived
`n Sephadex are also used commerciallyfor
`separations [37].
`Dextran fractions have been used extensively
`for preparing conjugates with biologically active
`substances, c.g., drugs, enzymes, and hormones
`
`(38). Conjugation prolongs the lifetime of the
`active componentin vivo, increases its stability,
`and facilitates the tarecting of the active com-
`ponent. Many dertvatives of dextran have been
`described and numerous patents have appeared.
`However, few haveattained significant commer-
`cial interest. Dextran sulfate (M7, ca. 500 000;
`sulfur content 18 %) and diethylaminocthyl dex-
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 8
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 8
`
`

`

`vy. Carbotyar CLA. Witham, 3.
`
`
` n. Chem. boc. 76 (1964)
`
`2
`
` 2
`
`MO
`
` . Walker:
` PRY
`470 -a7,
`
`Manners (ed):)
`
` timore i
`vol. 46, Univ,
`3G, M.7fief, G. Bruber, .
`
`pp. 75-110.
`
`a(1959
`
`&. PA. Inkerman in M.S, Lopez, €. MM. Madraze
`{eds.): Proceedings X VECCongress,
`tonal §*eeteny f
`Sugar Cane
`
`hnologists, WG13]aulive Committee of
`
`oT, Metro Manila 1980, po. 2411-2427.
`>. Gagnaire, M. Vignon, Makromol, Chem.
`178 (1977) 2321-2333.
`1G. ©. Larm, B.
`I
`dbeerg, S. Syensson,
`ry
`EL Weivel
`20 (1971) 39-48.
`ume
`Hi. Autson, H.
`Weige
`,
`bed

`_
`Biochem. J. 8(1.963) 555-562.
`12. c.taylor, NW. Cheetham, Gud.
`aC
`;
`om
`
`
`_%
`.
`
`E37 (985)
`3.
`(3.
`Gellman, N.W Toa
`1
`p
`g
`Polym. Sei.
`al, J,

`.
`
`
`
`4
`
`tA. Stormo
`
`Oe
`oe
`a
`9, Suppl. 29 (1957).
`3
`4
`Be ant\ 9RaA
`oe
`35. ©. Flexner ct al., Antimicrob. A
` 2550.
`
`
`emother., 35 (991) 2544—
`
`ae
`.
`hae:
`Bibhioer
`ay
`Aiags
`Dextran £presenMEMise.
`36,
`Publication no. 1355, U.S. Depart
`a
`Agriculture, Washington 1978.
`
`
`Mi. Curlin
`J.
`
`Proteins, Phar
`Uppsala 198
`38. L. Molteni in HL Bundgaard,A u. Ka
`
`
`oe ws
`yp ae
`me elak
`Kofod (eds.
`
`. Granath, J Colloid Sci. 13 (1958)
`\S ‘.
`
`
`
`OD howe Os
`a9
`Munksg
`
`Copenhagen 1982, pp. 2
`
`a>
`2. A. Rogovin, A.D. Virnik, K.P Khomiakey,
`. Gruber: Blutersaiz
`
` j nger Verlag,
`
`
`nactal,
`£ Macromol. Sei. Ch
`18. 6suizard, H. Chanzy, A. Sarko,
`erlin 1968, p. 68.
`2) $69 493,
`39. A.N. de Belder in R.L. Whistler (ed.):
`Macromolecules 17 (1984) 1G0- 107,
`
`
` 19. ALN. de Belder, B. Norrman, Carbaln Res.
`
` industrial Gums: Polysaccharides and Their
`
`
`8 (1968) L-6
`,
`Derive ives, Grd ed.Academic Press, 1993.
`wa
`“jerinck, Akad. Wetensch.
`40, AOW. Richter, H.1. Hedin, Pumunol. Today 3
`
`a
`(FORD)
`139.138
`Amsterdam Proc. Sect, Sc. 12 C910) 635.
`(1982) 132-138.
`
`4], M. Glicksman in M. Glicksman (ed.j: food
`2i, ELF. Hehre, Science (Was
`hington, B.C, 1883)
`i
`colloids,
`val.
`1Wate Press, Boca
`
`83 (1941) 237-238,
`137,
`22, M. Kobayashi, K. Matsuda, Biochem. Biophys.
`I
`
`
`tea.
`en
`AD
`Fed Revist
`Acta 644 (1980) 46-62.
`“2. Fed. Regist. 42
`-> Glucose and Glucose-Containing Syrups
`Dextrose
`Diacetone Alcohol
`-> Acetone
`Diacyl Peroxides
`-> Perexy Compounds, Organic
`
`.
`
`4,
`‘A
`
`37.
`
`
`
`Raton, Florida,
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00009
`PharmacosmosA/S v. American Regent,Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 9
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1037 - Page 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket