throbber
.-__ ... ;;�f.��-
`s _·t·'..�/-i
`
`& Practice
`
`I
`
`SIXTH EDITION
`
`@dition
`
`' '
`N. FRANKLIN ADKINSON, JR. • JOHN W. YUNGING.ER
`WILLIAM W. BUSSE • BRUCE S. BOCHNER
`
`STEPHEN T. HOLGATE • F. ESTELLE R. SIMONS
`
`i \
`',
`,. I
`t
`'
`
`I'
`
`�..,,1 Mosby., '•
`
`•
`
`I
`
`:-' ¥
`i
`!
`
`' ''
`
`i f' ·., .. ___ {
`·1 l. � i
`
`':
`
`': �
`
`· .. ;
`
`·ii;
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 1
`
`

`

`M
`
`I D D L E T 0 N
`
`s
`
`ALLERGY
`
`·l r I
`
`Principles & Practice
`
`VOLUME
`
`EDITED BY
`
`N. FRANKLIN ADKINSON, Jr., MD
`Professor of Medicine and Training Program Director
`Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
`The Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center
`The Hopkins Bayview Medical Campus
`Balti more, Maryland
`
`BRUCES. BOCHNER, MD
`Professor of Medicine and Director
`Division of A llergy and Clinical Immunology
`The Johns Hopkins Asthma and A llergy Center
`The Hopkins Bayview Medical C ampus
`Baltimore. Maryland
`
`l
`
`JOHN W. YUNGINGER, MD
`Emeritus Consultant in Pediatrics and Internal Medicine
`(Allergy)
`Mayo Clinic and Foundation
`Emeritus Professor of Pediatrics
`Mayo Medical School
`Rochester, Minnesota
`
`WILLIAM W. BUSSE, MD
`Charles E. Reed Professor of Medicine
`University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
`Head, Allergy and Clinical Immunology
`Department of Medicine
`University of Wisconsin School of Medicine
`Madison, Wisconsin
`
`STEPHEN T. HOLGATE, MD, DSc, FRCP, FMed Sci
`MRC Clinical Professor of Immunopharmacology
`Southampton General Hospital School of Med icine
`University of Southampton
`Southampton, United Kingdom
`
`F. ESTELLE R. SIMONS, MD, FRCPC
`Professor and Head
`Section of Allergy and C lin ical Immunology
`Department of Pediatrics and Child Health
`University of Manitoba
`Winnipeg. Manitoba, Canada
`
`SIXTH EDITION
`
`With more than 683 illustrations and 35 color plates
`
`A n Afliliate o f Elsev ier
`
`-
`
`- - - - - - - - - · ·
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 2
`
`

`

`An Affiliate of Elsevier
`
`The Curtis Center
`Independence Square West
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
`
`MIDDLETON'S ALLERGY PRINCIPLES & PRACTICE. 6TH EDITION
`Copyright © 2003, Mosby, Inc, All rights reserved,
`No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
`mechanical. including photocopying. recording, or any information storage and retrieval system. without
`pem1ission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier·s Health Sciences
`Rights Department in Philadelphia, PA, USA: phone: (+l) 215 238 7869, fax: (+l) 215 238 2239, e-mail:
`hea1thpermissions@e1sevier.com. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier Science
`homepage (http://www.elsevier.com). by selecting 'Customer Suppmt· and then 'Obtaining Permissions'.
`
`0-323-01425-9
`
`NOTICE
`Medicine is an ever-changing field. Standard safety precautions must be followed. but as new research and
`clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy may become necessary
`or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current product information provided by the
`manufacturer of each drug lO be administered to verify the recommended dose. the method and duration
`of administration. and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the treating physician. relying on
`experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual
`patient. Neither the publisher nor the editors assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons
`or property arising from this publication.
`
`Previous editions copyrighted 1978. 1983, 1988, 1993. 1998
`
`International Standard Book Number 0-323-01425-9
`
`Acquisitions Editor: Catherine Carroll
`Del'elopmemal Editor: Jennifer Shreiner
`Publishin,q Ser\'ices Manager: Patricia Tannian
`Senior Project Manager: Anne Altepeter
`Book Design lvlwwger: Gail Morey Hudson
`Cover Des(~11: Jen Brockett
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`Last digit is the print number: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
`
`'.!
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 3
`
`

`

`SECTION A
`IMMUNOLOGY
`
`CHAPTER J
`The Immune System
`An Overview
`(cid:127) William T. Shearer and Thomas A. Fleisher
`
`The practice of allergy at the level of pathogenesis and ther(cid:173)
`apy has its roots in the science called immunology, the field
`that codifies the components and describes the functions of a
`human host defense system designed to protect against chem(cid:173)
`ical su bstances, microorganis ms, and cancer. This host
`defense system comprises specific cellular and numerous pro(cid:173)
`tein components that interact in a highly complex manner and
`that, in essence, act to preserve self and to neutralize or
`destroy nonself Over the process of evolution, this system has
`developed into a remarkably effic ient mechanism for protect(cid:173)
`ing human life. However, as part of, or as a consequence of,
`this preservation system, immune responses have evolved that
`prove inadequate or detrimental , leading to human disease.
`Allergy is a clear example of the detrimental side of the
`immunologic system, an overreaction in certain individuals
`by a specific defense pathway that responds inappropriately to
`environmental encounters and results in annoying and some(cid:173)
`times debilitating secondary effects. A llergy is the study and
`treatment of human hypersensitivity reactions directed at non(cid:173)
`se lf molecules termed allergens; this contrasts with these
`same hypersensitivity mechanisms providing protection when
`responding to parasitic infection. Thus. allergy is an integral
`part of the manifestation of immunity. and physicians who
`treat allergic disease must understand the scope and breadth
`of the science of immunology. The notion that allergists
`practice in a vacuum of sc ientific design and treatment is
`incorrect. Rather, the allergist, armed with the knowledge of
`underlying immunopathogenetic principles of allergic disease
`and the capability of exploiti ng the immunologic basis of
`allergy, will be able to relieve patient symptoms with scientif(cid:173)
`ically based therapeutic measures.
`This chapter summarizes current knowledge of the origins
`of the immune system, the interworkings among the constituent
`pa1ts of the immune network, and the varied consequences,
`including allergy, of the host immune response. This chapter
`serves as a reference point for all subsequent chapters, which
`di scuss the clinical presentations, treatments, and manage(cid:173)
`ment strategies of allergic disease.
`
`FEATURES OF TIIE IMMUNE SYSTEM
`Over the past 200 years, and particularly the last 25 years, the
`resistance mechanisms against communicable diseases have
`been documented and explained, even visualized. The basic
`
`property of the immune system is that it can distingui sh nonse(f'
`from self, a power that promotes survival and exists in a delicate
`balance between tolerance to self and response/rejection of
`non self. Autoimmuni(v defines a state in which tolerance to self
`is lost. This implies that responses against self do not normally
`occur and that if they do occur with sufficient magnitude and
`duration, the outcome is harmful to the host. However, not all
`responses to self are harmful, but rather the capacity to recog(cid:173)
`nize self in the context of specific cell surface molecules
`encoded by the major hisrocompatibility complex (MHC) and
`in antiidiotypic responses is important for the control and nor(cid:173)
`mal functioning of the intact immune system. Implicit in the
`recognition of nonself is the resultant capability for the rejec(cid:173)
`tion of nonself by the immune system. Although this power of
`the immune system to recognize and rej ect nonself can under
`unusual circumstances initiate self-destructive autoimmunity,
`by and large the immune system has preserved vertebrate
`species from the microbial and parasitic forces that seem
`programmed to destroy them. The extraordinary measures that
`are necessary to circumvent the forces of immune rejection,
`as required in transplantation and autoimmunity medicine,
`illustrate the complex strengths of these p1imal survival mech(cid:173)
`anisms. These measures involve powerful immunosuppressive
`drugs, irradiation, and antilymphocyte antibodies that are nec(cid:173)
`essary to restrain the more serious rejection episodes, leaving
`the patient immunologically suppressed, particularly vulnera(cid:173)
`ble to opportunistic infection, and other complications.
`
`Immune Memory
`A remarkable aspect of the immune system is its property of
`memory, which provides protection against harmful microbial
`agents despite reexposure being separated by prolonged peri(cid:173)
`ods, even decades. Immunolog ic memory is made possible by
`the clonal expansion of lymphocytes in response to antigen
`stimulation. From the time the human immune system first
`begins to differentiate in fetal life, uniquely reacting lympho(cid:173)
`cytes are created by the random recombination of segments of
`deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) that code for antigen receptors
`expressed on the lymphocyte cell membrane. Through the
`expression of these receptors, each of the lymphocytes has the
`abil ity to bind to and become activated by a specific non-self
`antigen, either natural or artificial. lnteraction with antigen
`not only activates the lymphocytes, but also results in the
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 4
`
`

`

`2
`
`SECT/ONA
`
`Immunology
`
`generation of long-lived antigen-specific memory cell clones.
`Thus in the future, when the same antigen enters the body,
`there is an immediate recognition by these memory cells. Both
`cellular and humoral responses to the antigen a.re produced
`quickly, which offers protection in the case of an infectious
`agent or neoplastic cell, and another round (boosting) of mem(cid:173)
`ory cell generation ensues. This process of expansion of clonal
`populations of uniquely reacting lymphocytes first explained
`the B lymphocyte origin of antibody diversity and applies to
`cellular (T lymphocytes) immune responses as well. 1.2
`
`Surveillance
`Because of the early documentation of immune memory, a
`theory of immune surveillance arose that purported that the
`immune system was in a perpetual state of vigilance, screen(cid:173)
`ing and rejecting any nonself entity that appeared in the body.
`According to this theory, bacteria, viruses, and cancer cells
`are being regularly countered by this surveillance mechan ism.
`However, criticism of this theory originates from the observa(cid:173)
`tion that, despite protection offered by the system, fatal malig(cid:173)
`nancies frequently arise.3.4 Nevertheless, the phe nomenal
`explosion of the acquired immunodefici e ncy synd rome
`(AIDS) epidemic has demonstrated that the immune system,
`particularly the CD4+ T lymphocyte, plays a cruci al role in
`preventing the acquisition of fatal opportunistic infections and
`the early appearance of at least certain malignancies, includ(cid:173)
`ing Kaposi's sarcoma and lymphoid cancers.5
`
`Tolerance (Central vs. Peripheral)
`Tolerance is the process by which the immune system is pro(cid:173)
`grammed to eliminate foreign substances such as microbes,
`7
`toxins, and neoplastic tissues but to accept self-antigens.6

`This process depends on the express ion of unique B and T cell
`antigen receptors, involving somatic gene recombination
`events during cell development. Lymphocyte receptor genes
`recombine to give antigen specificity. When the lymphocyte
`that expresses rearranged receptor genes is stimulated by
`binding of the appropriate specific antigen to the receptor, the
`cell propagates, signaling the initial step toward elimination
`of the antigen or the cells bearing the foreign anti gen.
`Immunologic self-tolerance is not complete at bi rth but is
`actively acquired and maintained during life. Several mecha(cid:173)
`nisms may be operating. One mechanism is central clonal
`deletion, resulting in the elimination of self-reactive immature
`T lymphocytes in the thymus and self-reactive B lymphocytes
`in bone marrow. The process of central tolerance occurs in
`lymphoid tissue and is not complete because not all self(cid:173)
`antigens are expressed in these organs. Peripheral LOlerance
`appears to be maintained by several mechanisms, including
`clonal deletion, anergy, suppression, and clonal ignorance.
`Clonal anergy results in T cells incapable of responding to the
`specific antigen, whereas deletion results in the elimin ation of
`a utoreactive T lymphocytes. Other nonlymphoid cells may
`induce suppression of self-antigen- reactive T cells, whereas
`naive T cells may ignore some self-antigens.
`
`Biologic Amplification System
`Although the memory capabilities of the immune system are
`conveyed by lymphocytes, a combination of cellular and
`
`humoral components of the immun e and inflam matory sys(cid:173)
`tems are necessary for appropriate host defense. This combi(cid:173)
`nation of elements in the immune response is considered part
`of a biologic amplification srstem that greatly augments the
`capability of the immune response. Thus, both soluble mol e(cid:173)
`cules (e.g., activated comple ment proteins. interleukins,
`chemokines, other cytokines) and cellular components (e.g.,
`poly morphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, macrophages,
`eosin ophils, basophils, mast cell s; the "inn ate" immune
`response) greatly amplify the recognition and rejection power
`of lymphocytes.8 9 Viewed from this perspective, many
`portions of the inflammatory a nd immune response beco me
`integrated into an e legant and multifaceted system that
`distinguishes self from no nself.
`Perhaps the clearest examp le of the cells and mediators of
`the allergic response participating in host defense is the pro(cid:173)
`tective role that eosinophi!s and im111u11oglobuli11 E (lgE) play
`in parasitic infection. 10 Eosinophils facilitate destruction of
`larvae by the release of cytotox ic proteins (e.g .. major basic
`protein) when the eosinophil Fe receptor (FcR) FcaR (CD89)
`or FcyRII (CD32) binds immunoglobulin A (IgA) , lgG, or IgE
`specifically bound to the he lminths. All these antiparasiti c
`responses involving mast cells, eosinophils, and immuno(cid:173)
`globulin are exquisitely dependent on T cell control. Here, too,
`other components of the immune system, such as macrophages,
`neutrophils, and complement components, amplify the cyto(cid:173)
`toxic effects of the immediate hypersens itivity system. The
`combined power of these various components of host defen se
`enables individuals to survive the myriad of insults from bio(cid:173)
`logic and c hemical agents.
`
`CONSTITUENTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
`IMMUNE SYSTEM
`All the cells of the immune syste m derive from the bone mar(cid:173)
`row ; in fact, all the inflam matory and ancillary cells that work
`in concert with the primary cells of the immune system derive
`from the pluripotent stem cell (Figure 1-1 ). This pluripoten(cid:173)
`tial stem cell gives ri se to a lymphoid stem cell and a myeloid
`stem cell. The lymphoid stem cell differentiates in to three
`types of cells-
`the T lymphocyte, the B lymphocyte. and
`the 110 11-T. non-B natural killer (NK) cell progenitor- and
`contributes to the development of subsets of dendritic cells.
`The myeloid stem cell gives rise to dendritic cell s, mast
`cells, basophils. neutrophil s. eosinophils, monocytes. and
`macrophages, as well as megakaryocytes and erythrocytes.
`Differentiation of both these committed stem cells is critically
`dependent on an ,may of cytokine and cell-ce ll interactions.
`An ever-increasing number of biologically important surface
`membrane proteins are being characterized on cells of the
`immune system. Many of these molecules have been assig ned
`a sequential number based on the cluster of differentiation
`(CD ) nomenclature.
`
`T Cell Development: Role of Thymus
`Lymphoid stem cells leave the bone marrow through the
`bloodstream. Some cells enter the thymus gland and, by a
`poorly understood process, remain in the thymus gland, where
`precursor cells ultimately develop into mature T cell s, emerg(cid:173)
`ing with distinct genome, surface antigen, and functional
`12 When the lymphoid stem cell
`characteristics (Fig ure 1-2). 1 1

`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Pleuripotent
`hematopoietic
`stem cell
`
`Lymphoid
`stem cell
`
`Thymus DJ
`l
`
`Dendritic cells
`Monocytes
`Neutrophils
`Eosinophils
`Mast cells
`Basophils
`Platelets
`Erythrocytes
`
`Tcell
`NK cell
`Plasma cell
`FIGURE 1-1 Derivation of the cel ls of the immune system and he matopoi(cid:173)
`etic system. Pluripotent stem cells are deri ved from the yolk sac and
`ultimately reside in the bone marrow. All lymphocytes are deri ved from the
`lymphoid ste m cell and differentiate into three types of lymphocytes: ( 1)
`mature T cells after passage through the thymus gland. (2) large granular
`lymphocyte cells that possess natural ki ller (N K) function. a nd (3) B cells
`that can differentiate into plasma cells capable or secreting antibodies.
`Monocytes and macrophages are deri ved from mye loid stem cells: in
`addition, neutrophi ls, eosinophils. e rythrocytes, megakaryocytes. mast
`cells, basophils, and dendritic cells are also derived from this stem cell. The
`differentiation of stem cells into mature specialized cells is under the control
`of numerous cytokines and cel l-secreted factors.
`
`CHAPTER 1
`
`The Immune System
`
`3
`
`Bone marrow
`
`t
`
`Blood stream
`
`t Thymus © t
`
`CD4- , CDs(cid:173)
`TC Ra-, 13-
`
`CD4+, CDB(cid:173)
`TCRa+, 13 '
`
`Bloodstream
`
`t
`
`Lymph tissue
`
`FIGURE 1-2 Ontogeny a nd lineage relationships of matu ring T cells
`expressing TCRo.~. Most thymocytes express both CD-l and CD8. T cell
`antigen receptor (TCR) expression commences in this double-positi\'e stage.
`beginning with low numbers of receptors on each cell and increasing as mat(cid:173)
`urati on proceeds. Single-positi ve. that is, CD4+ or CDS· TCR-a~-express(cid:173)
`ing. mature cells are selected from this population. A small population of
`double-negative T cells bearing TCR-y8 a lso leave the thymus (not shown).
`
`enters the thymus, it lacks surface antigens, including the T
`cell antigen receptor (TCR) complex and mature T cell mark(cid:173)
`ers (e.g., CO4, CDS) that are associated with specific effector
`functions. These "double-negative" thymocytes (CO4-/COS-)
`are induced to express COl , CO2, CDS, CO6, CO7, and
`interleukin-2 receptor (1L-2R) molecules, which subserve
`critical receptor-ligand functions during early ontogeny.
`Subsequently, these progenitor T cells undergo development
`into descendant cells with rearranged alpha (a) and beta (~)
`( or gamma and delta) genes of the TCR, resulting in immature
`T cel1s. Cell surface expression of the TCR depends on
`coexpression of the CD3 molecule, which is a cluster of
`gamma (y), delta (o), epsilon (£), and zeta (/;) chains (see
`below). 13 Together, the TCR and CO3 molecules form the
`TCR complex.
`As the cells progress through ontogeny within the thymus,
`positive and negative selection occurs. resulting in release of
`mature T cells that have the capacity to distinguish between
`self and nonself antigens presented in the context of self(cid:173)
`MHC molecules. This maturation process is under the control
`of specialized cortical cells of the thymus, either by cell-to(cid:173)
`cell contact or by elaboration of cytokines, and it results in the
`elimination of most precursors that enter the thymus. For the
`
`most part, two cell types leave the thymus and begin to circu(cid:173)
`late in the peripheral blood, lymphatic system, and tissues:
`TCR-a~+/CO4+ T cells and TCR-aW/CDS+ T cells. Less than
`10% of mature T cells emerge from the thymus as TCR-yo+ T
`cells, which are predominantly co4-1cos-, and whose phys(cid:173)
`iologic role is j ust emerging. All peripheral T cells bear the
`TCR complex, and thus CO3 represents a pan-T cel l marker.
`T cell activation occurs when the TCR binds to immunogenic
`epitopes displayed on a cell (see below). CDS+ T cells recog(cid:173)
`nize antigenic peptides displayed in the context of class I
`MHC molecules, which are displayed on virtually all nucle(cid:173)
`ated cells, whereas CD4+ T cells recognize antigens presented
`in the context of class 11 MHC molecules, which are found on
`a limited range of cells referred to as antigen-presenting cells
`(APCs: monocytes, macrophages, B cells, dendritic cells).
`Altho ugh CO4+ T cells are sometimes fun ctionall y
`referred to as helper T cells and cos+ T cells as cytotoxic T
`cells, CD4+ T cells and COS+ T cells can have diverse fu nc(cid:173)
`tions. Thus, these phenotypes should be recognized for their
`capacity to respond to antigen in the context of MHC. The
`CD3 complex of proteins transduces the effect of antigen
`recognition by producing a signal through the cell membrane
`lipid bilayer to the cell interior and nucleus (see below).
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 6
`
`

`

`4
`
`SECT/ONA
`
`/111111,mology
`
`Table 1-1 Accessory Molecules (Receptor-Ligand
`Pairs) that Stabilize the Binding of T Lymphocytes
`to Antigen-Presenting Cells (APCs)
`
`T Cell
`
`APC
`
`T cell receptor
`CD4
`CDS
`CDI la (LFA-la), CDIS
`(LFA- 1~)
`CO2 (LFA-2)
`CD40L
`CD28
`
`HLA and peptide
`HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DP
`HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C
`CD54 (!CAM- I), ICAM-2, ICAM-3
`
`CD58 (LFA-3)
`CD40
`CDSO (B7)
`
`LFA, Leukocyte function-associated antigen: !CAM, intercellular adhesion
`molecule.
`
`Essential to the proliferation of antigen-activated T cells is
`their expression of the CD25 (IL-2R o:. chain, p55) which
`combines with the p chain (p75, CD 122) and)' chain (CD 132)
`to form the high-affinity JL-2R. Signaling through this recep(cid:173)
`tor initiates the production of IL-2, resulting in autocrine cell
`growth. A number of accessory glycoprotein adhesion mole(cid:173)
`cules stabilize the binding of T cells to the APC during the
`recognition phase or to the target cell in the effector phase,
`as well as providing for a co-stimulatory signal required for
`T cell activation (Table 1-1 ).
`
`Major Histocompatibility Complex and
`Immune Response
`The biologic basis for antigen recognition in the context of
`MHC molecules is to allow distinction between self and
`nonself. In humans the MHC gene complex is located on
`chromosome 6 and compri ses genes that code for human
`leukocyte antigen (HLA). 1
`~ Class I MHC molec ules (HLA-A,
`HLA-B, HLA-C) are composed of a 44-kD variant chain that
`is noncovalently associated with the 12-kD non-MHC
`invariant chain, P?-microglobulin. Class II MHC molecules
`(HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, HLA-DP) are composed of a 34-kD
`a-variant chain, noncovalently associated with a 29-kD P(cid:173)
`variant chain. The biologic role of the MHC molecules is to
`display antigenic peptides that enables appropriate TCRs to
`bind them. In general, class I MHC molecules present
`endogenously derived antigenic peptide after antigen process(cid:173)
`ing, such as viral epitopes, to CD8+ T cells, 15 whereas class II
`MHC molecules presen t exogenously derived antigenic
`peptide, such as soluble bacterial protein-derived antigenic
`peptide, to CD4+ T cells.16 Both class I and class II MHC
`gene products exhibit simple mendelian inheritance with
`co-dominant expressio n. Thus, single cells from any individ(cid:173)
`ual typically express pairs of the MHC gene products
`corresponding to the maternal and paternal alleles.
`Class I MHC molecules have three external domains, and
`their crystalline structure has been resolved. 17 The antigen(cid:173)
`binding site resides within a groove formed by the first and
`second (o:. 1 and o:.) external domains of the class I MHC mol(cid:173)
`ecule, and the appropriate TCR on CD8+ T cells recognizes
`the antigen in association with these epitopes; the o:.1 domain
`has been implicated in the interaction with CD8 (Figure 1-3).
`
`-+---- Peptide backbone
`([3-pleated sheet)
`
`- - - - - Anchor residue
`(binding amino acid)
`
`~ Groove (imagine
`cupped hand)
`
`FIGURE 1-3
`Floor of HLA class I molecule on antigen-presenting cell
`(APCJ. as seen by a CDS• T cell antigen receptor (TCR) complex. Tbe floor
`(groove) of the HLA class I molecule on an APC is formed by the ~-pleated
`sheets of the peptide backbone. Amino acids specific for each TCR complex
`anchor the two protein complexes in the presence of antigen. The TCR bind(cid:173)
`ing groove of HLA class II molecules binds to the CD4• of T cells in a sim(cid:173)
`ilar manner (see also Figure 1-4).
`
`On class II MHC molecules the o:. and~ chains each have two
`immunoglobulin-li ke ex ternal domains. The crystalline struc(cid:173)
`ture of class II molecules also has been determined, demon(cid:173)
`strating a putative antigen-binding cleft on the distal face of
`the molecule. 18 The appropriate TCR on CD4+ T cells recog(cid:173)
`nizes the antigen in this binding cleft, whereas the CD4 mol(cid:173)
`ecule binds to a nonpolymorphic epitope or epitopes on the
`class II MHC molecule. 19 Unlike antigenic peptides, certain
`microbial antigens referred to as superantigens can activate
`large numbers of T cells by direct interaction wi th class II
`MHC and the p chain of the TCR. Antigen induced activation
`of T cells requires a combination of two different signals.
`The first is provided by a TCR-based interaction between
`the receptor and the appropriate MHC-antigenic peptide.
`A second or co-stimulatory signal is required for antigen(cid:173)
`induced T cell activation, for example, the interaction
`between CD28 on the T cell and CD80 on the APC.
`Because generation of an effector immune response
`depends on helper T cell function, which is usually mediated
`by CD4+ T cell TCR recognition of an antigenic peptide pre(cid:173)
`sented in the groove of a class 11 MHC molecule, class II
`MHC molecules are referred to as the products of immune
`response genes. Thus the potential to mount an immune
`response depends on the class II MHC gene repertoire, as well
`as an appropri ate T cell receptor gene repertoire. Changes as
`subtle as a single amino acid difference at a critical site withi n
`the class II MHC molecule can alter its capacity to present an
`immunogenic peptide sequence derived from the intact anti(cid:173)
`gen. The described changes within class II MHC molecules
`associated with a responder or nonresponder state occur
`within the amino terminal domain that may translate into
`disease resistance or susceptibility. For example, disease
`resistance for juvenile-o nset diabetes can be conferred by
`having aspartate encoded at position 57 of a DQ p chain; this
`alters the salt bridge in the antigen-binding cleft of the DQ
`molecule. 20 Likewise, susceptibility for development of
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 7
`
`

`

`CHAPTER 1
`
`The Immune System
`
`5
`
`rheumatoid arthritis and pemphigus vulgaris is strongly asso(cid:173)
`ciated with particular class II MHC amino terminus residues.
`
`T Cell Antigen Receptor Gene Rearrangement
`and T Cell Activation
`The genes that encode the variable and constant regions of the
`TCR a and~ chains (or y and o) are found on separated DNA
`segments that must be rearranged for transcription of a com(cid:173)
`plete ribonucleic acid (RNA) message. The coding sequence
`of the variable (V) region of the a (and y) gene is formed by
`rearrangement of a V gene segment with a joining (J) gene
`segment, whereas V, diversity (D), and J gene segments of
`DNA reairnnge to produce~ (and o) chain variable region cod(cid:173)
`ing sequences. The V region sequences are next joined to the
`constant (C) region sequences. The net result of these DNA
`rearrangements and subsequent messenger RNA (mRNA)
`splicing during T cell development in the thymic cortex is to
`provide for an enormous diversity ofTCR antigen specificity.2 1
`
`When TCR-a~ binds to a specific peptide presented in the
`context of an appropriate MHC molecule in the presence of the
`co-stimulatory signal, a signal is imparted to the T cell that
`results in the following activation events: (1 ) hydrolysis of the
`phospholipid component of the lipid bilayer, phosphatidyl(cid:173)
`inositol bisphosphate, into inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and dia(cid:173)
`cylglycerol (DG); (2) elevation of intracellular calcium levels
`produced partly by IP,; (3) activation of protein kinase C
`(PKC) by interaction with DG; and (4) phosphorylation and
`activation of tyrosine kinase (Figure 1-4 ).22•23 All these activa(cid:173)
`tion events convey messages to the cell nucleus and appropri(cid:173)
`ate target genes for the nuclear factor of activated T cells
`(NFAT) and the protooncogene c-fos, or transcriptional regula(cid:173)
`tor proteins, such as activator protein-I (AP-1 ), that together
`regulate cell activity. These activated genes in tum code for
`proteins that commit the T cell to a subsequent specific
`function. Thus, there is an orderly appearance of proteins pro(cid:173)
`duced by the activated cell that are important in subsequent
`cell function or that interact with other immune cells.
`
`Antigen (AG)-presenting cell
`
`CDB0/86
`
`Class II MHC
`
`CD28
`
`Tcell
`
`Fyn or Lek
`phosphorylate
`tyrosine residues
`on the CD3 t and e
`c;haines, allowing
`ZAP-70, MAPK to
`bind and become
`activated
`
`. Fyn and Lek protein tyrosine kinase
`clustering activates kinase activity
`
`,--- ----< Protein tyrosine
`phosphatase
`activates
`Lek and Fyn
`
`1 - - -(cid:141) 1 ZAP-70 and Fyn kinases activate
`phospholipase C--y to cleave
`phosphatidylinositol to diacylglycerol
`(DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3)
`
`DAG activates protein kinase C (PKG)
`IP3 increases intracellular
`Ca2+ concentration
`
`PKC and Ca2+ activate other proteins(cid:173)
`ultimately a9tivating DNA-binding
`protei_ns (e.g. NF-KB, Oct, ETS)
`
`DNA-binding proteins induce specific
`gene tran~cription (NFAT, IL-2), leading
`to proliferation and differentiation
`
`FIGURE 1-4 Acti vation of CD4+ T cells, with binding of T cell antigen receptor (TCR) to antigen-presenting
`cell (first signal) and accessory molecul es (second signal). Cross-linking of TCR causes aggregation with the
`CD3 complex conta ining c, Ii, and t; chains, together with the three dimers and activation of phosphorylation and
`differe ntiation.
`ZAP, Zeta-associated protein; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MAPK, mitogenic-associated prolifera(cid:173)
`tion kinase; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; IL, interle ukin; Lek, Fyn, tyrosine kinases.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1022 - Page 8
`
`

`

`6
`
`SECT/ONA
`
`Immunology
`
`These intricate cell activation events are of considerable
`importance to the clinical practice of allergy and immunology
`because their discovery and e lucidation is helping explain
`mechanisms underl ying efficacious treatments given to
`patients for decades. Glucocorticoids, for example, inhibit
`early Teel I gene activation events by the induction of proteins
`that bind to DNA sequences in the region of promoter response
`elements, whereas cyclosporin A and tacrolimus (FK506)
`inhibit a serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase called
`calcineurin that blocks specific gene transcription.
`
`B Cell Development
`The B cell matures in the bone marrow, but during fetal life
`this occurs in the liver. During maturation of the B cell, a
`series of DNA rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy(cid:173)
`chain genes and light-chain genes occurs for production of
`membrane-bound and secreted immunoglobulin molecules
`(Table 1-2). As the pre-B cell matures, it acquires µ-chain
`gene rearrangement together with sun-ogate invariant light
`chains (11.5 and V pre-B) necessary for effective transport ofµ
`to the cell surface expressed as the pre- B cell receptor.
`Association of the pre-B cell receptor with lga and lg~ pro(cid:173)
`vides a means for signal transduction that facilitates contin(cid:173)
`ued maturation of the pre-B cell kappa (K) or lambda (A) gene
`rean-angements, ultimately resulting in the expression of a
`complete JgM molecule on the cell surface. Mature B cells
`coexpress surface IgM and lgD after heavy-chain mRNA
`splicing. All these maturation processes are antigen inde(cid:173)
`pendent. Subsequent differentiation of the IgM+/JgD+ mature
`B cells released into the periphery is antigen driven. Thus,
`activation of mature B cells into immunoglobulin-secreting B
`cells or long-lived memory B cells and final differen

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket