throbber

`
`immuno
`iO ogyo
`
`THE IMMUNE BYITBM IN HEALTH AND DIBIABE
`
`IV"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHARLES A JANEWAY PAUL THAVEFIB
`
`MARK WALPDHT
`
`MARK BHLDMCHIK
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 1
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 1
`
`

`

`r—————.
`
`,
`
`I
`
`i
`
`l
`
`immuno
`iologye
`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HIALTH AND DISEAII
`
`Charles A. Janaway, Jr.
`
`Yale University School of Medicine
`
`Paul Travers
`
`I
`
`Anthony Nolan Research Institute. London
`
`I
`
`Mark Walpor-t
`
`Imperial College School of Medicine. London
`
`I
`
`Mark J. Shlomchik
`
`Yale University School of Medicine
`
`
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 2
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 2
`
`

`

`Vice President:
`Text Editors:
`Managing Editor:
`Editorial Aeoletant:
`Managing Production Editor:
`Production Assistant:
`New Media Editor:
`Cepyedltor:
`indexer:
`Illustration and Layout:
`Manufacturing:
`
`Denise Schanck
`Penelope Austin. Eleanor Lawrence
`Sarah Gibbs
`Mark Ditzei
`Emma Hunt
`Angela Bennett
`Michael Morales
`Len Cegieika
`Liza Fumival
`Blink Studio. London
`Marion Morrow. Flory MacDonald
`
`0 2001 by Garland Publishing.
`All rights reserved. No part oi this publication may be reproduced. stored in a retrieval
`system or transmitted in any iorrn or by any means—electronic. mechanical. photocopying.
`recording. or otherwise—without the prior written permission oi the copyright holder.
`
`Distributors:
`Inside North America: Garland Publishing, 29 West 351h Street,
`New York. NY 10001-2299.
`Ins/d9 Japan: Nankodo Co. Ltd.. 42-6, Hongo 3~Chrome. Bunkyo-ku.
`Tokyo, 113-8410, Japan.
`Outslde North America and Japan: Churchill Livingstone, Hebert Stevenson House,
`1-3 Baxter's Place, Leiih Walk, Edinburgh, EH1 3AF.
`
`iSBN 0 8153 3642 X (paperback) Garland
`iSBN 0 4430 7093 9 (paperback) Churchill Livingstone
`iSBN 0 4430 7099 T (paperback) international Student Edition
`
`Library oi Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Date
`lmmunobiology : the immune system in health and disease I Charles A. Janeway. Jr. .
`[et ai.].-- 5th ed.
`p. cm.
`includes bibliographical reierenoes and index.
`iSBN o-e153-ae42nx (pbk.)
`1. immunology. 2. immunity. l. Janeway. Charles. it. Title.
`
`.
`
`QR181 .I454 2001
`616.07'9-41021
`
`2001016039
`
`This book was produced using QuarkXpreas 4.11 and Adobe illustrator 9.0
`
`Published by Garland Publishing. a member of the Taylor 8. Francis Group,
`29 West 3511: Street, New York, NY 10001-2299.
`
`Printed in the United States of America.
`15141312111098785432
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 3
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`[I
`
`CONTENTS
`
`PART I
`
`AN INTRODUCTION TO IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND INNATE IMMUNITY
`
`Chapter 1
`Chapter 2
`
`Basic Concepts in Immunology
`Innate Immunity
`
`THE RECOGNITION OF ANTIGEN
`
`Chapter 3
`
`Antigen Recognition by B-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`Chapter 4
`
`The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`
`Chapter 5
`
`Antigen Presentation to T Lymphocytes
`
`THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATURE LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR
`REPERTOIRES
`
`Chapter 6
`
`Signaling Through Immune System Receptors
`
`Chapter 7
`
`The Development and Survival of Lymphocytes
`
`
`_
`_
`__
`Chapters
`
`THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSE
`
`TCeII-Mediated Immunity
`
`Chapter 9
`
`The Humoral Immune Response
`
`Chapter 10 Adaptive Immunity to Infection
`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Failures of Host Defense Mechanisms
`
`Chapter 12 Allergy and Hypersensitivity
`
`Chapter 13 Autoimmunity and Transplantation
`
`Chapter 14 Manipulation of the Immune Response
`
`Afterward Evolution 01 the Immune System: Past, Present, and Future,
`by Charles A. Janeway. Jr.
`
`Appendix I
`
`Immunologists’ Toolbox
`
`Appendix II
`
`CD Antigens
`
`Appendix III Cytokines and their Receptors
`
`Appendix IV Chemokines and their Receptors
`
`Appendix V Immunological Constants
`
`Biographies
`
`1
`35
`
`93
`
`123
`
`155
`
`187
`
`221
`
`295
`
`341
`
`381
`
`425
`
`471
`
`501
`
`553
`
`597
`
`613
`
`661
`
`677
`
`680
`
`681
`
`682
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Glossary
`Index
`
`
`
`683
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 4
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 4
`
`

`

`F1
`
`THE RECOGNITION
`
`OF ANTIGEN
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 5
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 5
`
`

`

`123
`
`The Generation of
`
`Lymphocyte Antigen
`Receptors
`
`
`
`Lymphocyte antigen receptors, in the form of immunoglobulins on B cells
`and T-cell receptors on T cells. are the means by which lymphocytes sense
`the presence of antigens in their environment. The receptors produced by
`each lymphocyte have a unique antigen specificity. which is determined by
`the structure of their antigen-binding site, as described in Chapter 3. Because
`each person possesses billions of lymphocytes, these cells collectively pro-
`vide the individual with the ability to respond to a great variety of antigens.
`The wide range of antigen specificities in the antigen receptor repertoire is
`due to variation in the amino acid sequence at the antigen-binding site,
`which is made up from the variable (V) regions of the receptor protein chains.
`In each chain the V region is linked to an invariant constant (C) region, which
`provides effector or signaling functions.
`
`Given the importance of a diverse repertoire of lymphocyte receptors in the
`defense against infection.
`it is not surprising that a complex and elegant
`genetic mechanism has evolved for generating these highly variable proteins.
`Each receptor chain variant cannot be encoded in full in the genome, as this
`would require more genes for antigen receptors than there are genes in the
`entire genome. Instead, we will see that the V regions of the receptor chains are
`encoded in several pieces—so-called gene segments. These are assembled in
`the developing lymphocyte by somatic DNA recombination to form a complete
`V-region sequence, a mechanism known generally as gene rearrangement.
`Each type of gene segment is present in multiple copies in the germline
`genome. The selection of a gene segment of each type during gene rearrange-
`ment occurs at random, and the large number of possible different combi-
`nations accounts for much of the diversity of the receptor repertoire.
`
`in the first two parts of this chapter we will describe the gene rearrangement
`mechanism that generates the V regions of immunoglobuiin and T-cell
`receptor genes. The basic mechanism is common to both B cells and T cells,
`and involves many if not all of the same enzymes. We will describe the details
`ol'the enzymology of this recombination process, the evolution of which was
`probably critical to the evolution of the vertebrate adaptive immune system.
`
`In B cells, but not T cells, the rearranged V region undergoes additional
`modification, known as somatic hypermutation. This does not occur until
`after B cells encounter and become activated by antigen. in these cells, the
`V regions of the assembled immunoglobulin genes undergo a high rate of
`point mutation that creates additional diversity within the expanding clone
`0f B cells responding to antigen.
`
`In the third part of the chapter we consider the limited, but functionally
`important, diversity of immunoglobulin C regions. The C regions of T-cell
`receptors do not show such diversity as they function only as part of a
`membrane-bound antigen receptor. Their role is to anchor and support the
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 6
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`IE Chapter 4: The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors v.0
`
`;
`
`
`
`,
`'
`.
`'
`
`:
`-
`
`V regions at tlte cell surface as Well as linking the binding of antigen by the
`V regions to the receptor—associated intracellular signaling complex. The
`C regions of immunogiobttlina also serve these functions but in addition the
`C regions of the heavy chain are responsible for the effector functions of the
`secreted immunoglobttlins, or antibodies. made by activated B cells. These 1”
`regions come itt several different versions. or isotypes. each of which has a
`different effector function. In B cells that have become activated by antigen. the
`heavy-chain V region cart become associated with a different C” region by a fur.
`titer somatic recombination event. in tire process known as isotype switching
`This enables the different heavy-chain (J regions, each with a different i'unc.
`tion, to be represented among antibodies of the same antigen specificity.
`
`The generation of diversity in immanoglobulins.
`
`Virtually any substance cart elicit an antibody response. Furthermore, the
`response even to a sitttplc antigen bearing a single antigenic determinant is
`diverse, comprising many different antibody molecules each with a unique
`affinity, or binding strength, for the antigen anti :1 subtly different specificity.
`The total number of antibody specificities available to an individual is known
`as the antibody repertoire, or immunoglobulin repertoire, attd itt humans is
`at least 10”, perhaps tttany more. The ttumber of atttibody specificities pre-
`sent at any one time is, however, limited by the total number oill cells in an
`individual, as well as by each individttal's encounters with antigens.
`
`Before it was possible to examine the immunogloltulin genes directly. there
`were two main hypotheses for the origin of this diversity. The germllne theory
`held that there is a separate gene for each different itntttunoglobttliu chain
`and that the antibody repertoire is largely inherited. By contrast. somatic
`diversification theories proposed that the obscured repertoire is generated
`front a limited number of inherited V-region sequences that undergo alter»
`ation within B cells during the individual’s lifetime. Clotting of the
`immuttuglobulin genes revealed that the antibody repertoire is, in fact, gett-
`erated by DNA rearrangements dttring B/ceii development. As we will see itt
`this part of the chapter. a DNA sequence encoding a V region is assembled
`at each locus by selection from a relatively small group of inherited gene
`segments. Diversity is further enhanced by the process of somatic hyper-
`mutation in mature activated B cells. Thus tltc somatic diversification theory
`was essentially correct, although the concept of multiple germlitte genes
`embodied in the germlinc theory also proved true.
`
`4-1
`
`lmmunoglobulln genes are rearranged in antibody-producing cells.
`
`sequences. In gt'rmline DNA. front nottiympltoid cells. the V- and C-t'egion
`
`In nonlyrnphoid cells, the gene segments encoding the greater part of the V
`region of an inttttunoglobulin chain are some considerable distance away from
`the sequence encoding the C region. in mature B lymphocytes, however, the
`assembled V-region sequence lies ntuch nearer the C region, as a consequence
`ul'genc rearrangement. Rearrangement within the intntuttoglubulitt genes was
`originally discovered 25 years ago. when it first became possible to study Ill?-
`organization of the immunoglohulin genes in both B cells and ttoltlympitoid
`cells using restriction enzyme analysis and Southern blotting. In this procr
`dare, chromosomal DNA is first cut with a restriction enzyme, and the DNA
`fragments containing particular V- and C-region sequences are identified by
`hybridization with radiolabeled UNA probes specific for the tolerant DNA
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 7
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 7
`
`

`

`
`
`The generation of diversity in immunoglobullns 125
`
`Fig. 4.1 lmmunoglobulln genes are
`rearranged In B cells. The two photo-
`graphs on the left (garmline DNA) show
`a Southern blot ot a restriction enzyme
`digest of DNA from nonlymphoid cells
`from a normal person. The locations oi
`lmmunoglobulin DNA sequences are
`identified by hybridization with V- and
`c—region probes. The V and C regions
`are found in distinct DNA fragments in
`the nonlymphoid DNA. The two photo-
`graphs on the right (B-cali DNA) are of
`the same restriction digest of DNA from
`peripheral blood lymphocytes irom a
`patient with chronic lymphocytic
`leukemia (see Chapter 7), in which an
`single clone at B cells is greatly
`
`expanded. The malignant B cells
`express the V region from which the
`V-region probe was obtained and,
`owing to their predominance in the cell
`population. this unique rearrangement
`can be detected. In this DNA, the V and
`C regions are found in the same
`fragment. which is a different size irom
`either the C- or the V-region germline
`fragments. Although not shown in this
`figure, a population of normal B lympho-
`cytes has many different rearranged
`genes, so they yield a smear of DNA
`fragment sizes, which are not visible as
`a crisp band. Photograph courtesy of
`S. Wagner and L. Luzzatto.
`
`
`
`sequences identified by the probes are on separate DNA fragments. However,
`in DNA from an antibody-producing B cell these V— and C-region sequences
`are on the same DNA fragment, showing that a rearrangement of the DNA has
`occurred. A typical experiment using human DNA is shown in Fig. 4.1.
`
`This simple experiment showed that segments of genomic DNA within the
`immunoglobulin genes are rearranged in cells of the B-lymphocyte lineage.
`but not in other cells. This process of rearrangement is known as somatic
`recombination, to distinguish it from the meiotic recombination that takes
`place during the production of gametes.
`
`4-2
`
`The DNA sequence encoding a complete V region is generated by the
`somatic recombination of separate gene segments.
`
`The V region, or V domain, of an immunoglobuiin heavy or light chain is
`encoded by more than one gene segment. For the light chain. the V domain
`is encoded by two separate DNA segments. The first segment encodes the
`first 95-10] amino acids of the light chain and is termed a V gene segment
`because it encodes most of the V domain. The second segment encodes the
`remainder of the V domain (up to 13 amino acids) and is termed a joining or
`1 gene segment.
`
`The rearrangements that lead to the production oln complete intmttnoglobttlin
`light-chain gene are shown in Fig. 4.2 (center panel). The joining ofa V and a
`J gone segment creates a continuous exon that encodes the whole ot'the light-
`chaln V region. in the ttnrcarranged DNA. the V gene segments are located
`relatively far away from the C region. The 1 gene segments are located close
`to the C region. however, and joining of a V segment to a J gene segment also
`brings the V gene close to a C—rcgion sequence. The I gene segment of the
`rearranged V region is separated frotn a C-rogton sequence only by an intron.
`in the experiment shown in Fig. 4 . I. the gonnline DNA fragment identified by
`tho ‘V-region probe' contains the V gene segment. and that identified by the
`'C-rcgion probc' actually contains both the J gent- segment and the C-rcglon
`sequence. To make a complete immunoglobulin light-chain messenger RNA,
`the V~region exon is joined to thc C-region sequence by RNA splicing after
`transcription (see Fig. 4.2).
`
`A heavy-chain V region is encoded in three gent.- segments. In addition to the
`V and i gene segments (denoted V" and in to distinguish them from the light-
`Cltnin VI. and it}. than: is a third gene segment called the diversity or D" gene
`Segment, which lies between the V“ and in ltenc segments. The process of
`teetnnhlnation that generates a complete heavy-chain V region is shown in
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 8
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 8
`
`

`

`g
`a
`
`D—J )oined
`rearranged DNA
`Somatic
`recombination
`li-JorV—DJ -
`
`rearranged D"———‘
`
`-
`
`Transcription
`
`Primary
`transcript RNA
`"-—-‘-"'
`
`1116 ll Chapter4: The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`
`Gerrnline DNA
`
`Somatic
`recombination
`
`SPH‘W
`
`Fig. 4.2 V-region genes are constructed from gene
`segments. Lightscheln V-reglon genes are constructed lrom two
`segments (center panel). A variable (V) and a )oining (J) gene
`segment in the genomic DNA are joined to term a complete
`light-chain V-region exon. lmrnunoglobulin chains are extra-
`cellular proteins and the V gene segment is preceded by an
`axon encoding a leader peptide (L), which directs the protein
`into the cell's secretory pathways and is then cleaved, The light-
`chain C region is encoded in a separate exon and is joined to
`the V-region exon by splicing oi the light-chain FINA to remove
`
`the L-to-V and the J-to-C introns. Heevy-oheln V regions are
`constructed from three gene segments (right panel). First. the
`diversity (D) and J gene segments join, then the V gene
`segment joins to the combined DJ sequence, lorrning a complete
`VH axon. A heavy-chain C-reglon gene is encoded by several
`axons. The C-reglon axons, together with the leader sequence.
`are spliced to the V-dornein sequence during processing oi the
`heavy-chain FtNA transcript. The leader sequence is removed
`alter translation and the disullide bonds that link the polypeptide
`chains are formed. The hinge region is shown in purple.
`
`Fig. 4.2 (right panel), and occurs in two separate stages. In the first. a I)” gene
`segment is joined to n in gene segment: then a V“ gene segment rearranges
`to DJ” to make a complete Vlrrcgion own. As with the light-chain genes,
`RNA splicing joins the assembled V-region sequence in the neighboring
`C-region gene.
`
`4-3
`
`There are multiple ditterent V-reglon gene segments.
`
`For simplicity, we have so far discussed the formation of a complete
`immunoglobuiin V-region sequence as though there were only a single copy
`of each gene segment. In fact, there are multiple copies of all of the gene seg-
`ments in germiine DNA. It is the random selection of just one gene segment
`of each type to assemble a V region that makes possible the great diversity of
`V regions among immunoglobulins. The numbers of functional gene segments
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 9
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 9
`
`

`

`
`
`Thcgeneretion oirllverslty in immunoglobullns l 127
`
`of each type in the human genome. as determined by gene cloning and
`sequencing, are shown in Fig. 4.3. Not all the gene segments discovered are
`functional, as a proportion have accumulated mutations that prevent them
`from encoding a functional protein. These are termed 'pseudogenes.’
`Because there are many V. D, and ] gene segments in germlinc DNA, no
`single one is essential. This reduces the evolutionary pressure on each gene
`segment to remain intact, and has resulted in a telatively large number of
`pseudogenes. Since some of these pseudogenes can undergo rearrangement
`just
`like a normal functional gene segment, a significant proportion of
`rearrangements will incorporate a pseudogene and thus be nonfunctional.
`
`The immunoglobulin gene segments are organized into three clusters or
`genetic loci—the x, it, and heavy-chain loci. These are on different chromo-
`somes and each is organized slightly differently, as shown in Fig. 4.4 for
`humans. At the 1 light- chain locus. located on chromosome 22, a cluster of V1
`gene segments is followed by four sets of I). gene segments each linked to a
`single Ct gene. In the K light-chain locus, on chromosome 2, the cluster of V“-
`gene segments is followed by a cluster of In gene segments, and then by a
`single CK gene. The organization of the heavy-chain locus, on chromosome
`14. resembles that of the K locus. with separate clusters ot‘Vu, D. I, and in gene
`segments and of Cu genes. The heavy-chain locus differs in one important
`way: instead of a single C-region, it contains a series of (1 regions arrayed one
`after the other, each of which corresponds to a different isorype. Generally. a
`cell expresses only one at a time, beginning with lgM. The expression of other
`isolypes, such as lgG, can occur through isotype switching, as will be
`described in Section 4-16.
`
`The human V gene segments can be grouped into families in which each
`member shares at least 80% DNA sequence identity with all others in the
`family. Both the heavy-chain and x-chain V gene segments can be subdivided
`into seven such families, whereas there are eight families of V;~ gene seg-
`ments. The families can be grouped into clans, made up of families that are
`
`
`
`Fig. 4.3 The numbers of functional
`gene segments for the V regions of
`human heavy and light chains. These
`numbers are derived lrom exhaustive
`cloning and sequencing of DNA from
`one individual and exclude all pseudo-
`genes (mutated and nonfunctional
`versions ot a gene sequence). Owing
`to genetic polymorphism, the numbers
`will not be the same for all people.
`
`A llght-chalnlocus
`L1 V11
`
`L2 V72
`
`K light-chain locus
`L1
`vt1
`L2 v,.2
`
`L3 vta
`
`L v..-- to
`
`J.1--5
`
`Heavy--chaln locus
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`L2 VH2L1 Uri! La Vitaml lflvflufifi } [
`
`
`Dul--2'a"
`
`1
`
`.ifli--fi
`
`Fig. 4.4 The gormllno organization of the lmmunoglobulin
`heavy- and light-chain loci In the human genome. The
`genetic locus for the it light chain (chromosome 22) has about
`30 lunotional Vt, gene segments and tour pairs at functional
`J}. gene segments and Ca. genes. The K locus (chromosome 2)
`Is organized in a similar way, with about 40 lunctional V» gene
`segments accompanied by a cluster oi live J,t gene segments
`but with a single Ct gene. In approximately 50% oi individuals.
`the entire cluster of r: V gene segments has undergone an
`increase by duplication (not shown for simplicity). The heavy-
`chain locus (chromosome 14) has about as functional VH gene
`
`segments and a cluster of around 27 D segments lying between
`these VH gene segments and six JH gene segments. The
`heavy-chain locus also contains a large cluster of CH genes that
`are described in Fig. 4.18. For simplicity we have shown only a
`single CH gene in this diagram without illustrating its separate
`axons. have omitted pseudogenes. and have show all v gene
`segments in the same orientation. L. leader sequence. This
`diagram is not to scale: the total length at the heavy-chain locus
`is over 2 megabases (2 million bases). whereas some oi the
`D segments are only six bases long.
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 10
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 10
`
`

`

`128
`
`Chapter 4: The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`
`more similar to each other than to families in other clans. Human V” gene
`segments fall into three such clans. All or the V“ gene segments identified
`from amphibians, reptiles, anti mammals also fall into the same three clans,
`suggesting that these clans existed in a common ancestor of these modern
`animal groups.
`
`4-4
`
`Rearrangement ow, D, and J gene segments is guided by flanking
`DNA sequences.
`
`A system is required to ensure that DNA rearrangements take place at the
`correct locations relative to the V. D. or] gene segment coding regions. In
`addition. joins must be regulated such that a V gene segment joins to a D or i
`and not to another V. DNA rearrangements are in fact guided by conserved
`noncoding DNA sequences that are found adjacent to the points at which
`recombination takes place. These sequences consist of a conserved block of
`seven nucleotides—the heptamer 5’CACAGTG3'—which is always contiguous
`with the coding sequence. followed by a nonconservcd region known as the
`spacer. which is either [2 or 23 nucleotides long. This is followed by a second
`conserved block of nine nucleotides—the nonnnter 5‘ACAAAAACC3' (Fig.
`4.5). The spacer varies in sequence but its conserved length corresponds to
`one or two turns of the DNA double helix. This brings the heptamer and non-
`amer sequences to the same side of the DNA helix. where they can be bound
`by the complex of proteins
`that
`catalyzes
`recombination. The
`heptamer—spacer—nonamer is called a recombination signal sequence (RSS).
`
`Recombination only occurs between gene segments located on the same
`chromosome. It generally follows the rule that only a gene segment flanked
`by a RSS with a lZ-base pair tbp) spacer can be joined to one flanked by a 23
`bp spacer RSS. This is known as the 12/23 rule. Thus. for the heavy chain. a
`I)” gene segment can be joined to a In gene segment and a Vn gene segment
`to n D; 1 gene segment. but V” gene segments cannot be joined to in gene seg-
`ments directly, as both V" and In gene segments are flanked by 23 bp spuccrs
`and the DH gene segments have 12 bp spacers on both sides (see Fig. 4.5).
`
`it is now apparent. however. that, even though it violates the 12/23 rule. direct
`joining of one D gene segment to another can occur in most species. in humans.
`D—D fusion is found in approximately 5% of antibodies and is the major mech-
`anism accounting for the unusually long CDR3 loops found in some heavy
`chains. By creating extra-long CDRBs and unusual amino acid combinations,
`these DFD fusions add further to the diversity of the antibody repertoire.
`
`The mechanism of DNA rearrangement is similar for the heavy- and light-
`chain loci, although only one joining event is needed to generate a light-chain
`gene whereas two are needed to generate a complete heavy-chain gene.
`The commonest mode of rearrangement (Fig. 4.6. left panels) involves the
`
`Fig. 4.5 Conserved hoptamsr and
`nonemer sequences flank the gene
`segments encoding the V regions of
`heavy (H) and light (it and w.) chains.
`The spacer (white) between the
`heptamer (orange) and nonamer
`(purple) sequences is always either
`approximately 12 Do or approximately
`23 bp. and Joining almost always
`involves a 12 bp and a 25 bp
`
`GACAGTG
`GTGTCAC
`
`
`
`recombination signal sequence.
`
`_ GGTTITI'GT
`CCAMMCA
`
`CACTGTG _
`GTGACAC
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 11
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 11
`
`

`

`
`
`The generation of diversity in immunogiobuilns
`
`129
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`looping-out and deletion of the DNA between two gene segments. This occurs
`when the coding sequences of the two gene segments are in the same orienta-
`tion in the DNA. A second mode of recombination can occur between two
`
`gene segments that have opposite transcriptional orientations. This mode of
`recombination is less common, although such rearrangements account for
`about half of all Vt.- to it; joins; the transcriptional orientation of half of the
`human VK gene segments is opposite to that of the 1,; gene segments. The
`mechanism of recombination is essentially the same, but the DNA that lies
`between the two gene segments meets a differentiate (Fig. 4.6, right panels).
`When the R855 in such cases are brought together and recombination takes
`place. the intervening DNA is not lost from the chromosome but is retained
`in an inverted orientation.
`
`4-5
`
`The reaction that recombines V, D, and .l gene segments involves
`both lymphocyte-specific and ubiquitous DNA-modifying enzymes.
`
`The molecular mechanism ofV-reglon DNA rearrangement, or V(D)l recombi-
`nation, is illustrated in Fig. 4.7. The 12 bp spaced and 23 bp spaced R859 are
`brought together by interactions between proteins that specifically recognize
`the length of spacer and thus enforce the 12123 rule for recombination. The
`DNA molecule is then broken in two pieces and rejoined in a dii'ferent
`cOi‘itiguration. The ends of the heptamer sequences are joined precisely in a
`
`Fig. 4.6 V-region gene segments are
`joined by recombination. In every
`V-region recombination event. the
`signals flanking the gene segments are
`brought together to allow recombination
`to take piece. For simplicity. the
`recombination of a light-chain gene is
`Illustrated: for the heavy-chain gene.
`two separate recombination events are
`required to generate a functional
`V region. In some cases. as shown in
`the left panels, the V and J gene
`segments have the same transcriptional
`orientation. Juxtapoeition of the
`recombination signal sequences results
`in the looping out at the intervening
`DNA. Heptamers are shown In orange,
`nonamers in purple, and the arrows
`represent the directions of the heptamsr
`and nonamer recombination signals
`(see Fig. 4.5). Fiecombinailon occurs at
`the ends of the heptamer sequences.
`creating a signal joint and releasing the
`intervening DNA in the form of a closed
`circle. Subsequently. the joining oi the
`V and J gene segments creates the
`coding joint. In other cases, illustrated
`in the right panels, the V and J gene
`segments are initially oriented in
`opposite transcriptional directions.
`Bringing together the signal sequences
`in this case requires a more complex
`looping ol the DNA. Joining the ends of
`the two heptamer sequences new
`results in the inversion and integration
`of the intervening DNA. Again. the
`joining of the V and J segments creates
`a functional eregion axon.
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 12
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 12
`
`

`

`FEB—Quill Chapter 4: The Generation oi Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 4.7 Enzymatic steps In the
`rearrangement of immunoglobulln
`gene segments. Rearrangement begins
`with the binding of RAG-1, RAG-2. and
`high mobility group (HMG) proteins
`(not shown). These HAG-tthAG-Z
`complexes (domes. colored green or
`purple tor clarity although they are
`identical at each recombination site)
`recognize the recombination signal
`sequences (arrows) flanking the coding
`sequences to be joined (red and yellow
`rectangles). These are then brought
`together (second panel). toilowing which
`the RAG complex is activated to cut one
`strand oi the double-stranded DNA
`precisely at the end of the heptamer
`sequences (third panel). The 5’ cut end
`of this DNA strand then reacts with the
`complementary uncut strand. breaking it
`
`to leave a double-stranded break at the
`end oi the heptamer sequence. and
`forming a hairpin by Joining to the cut
`end of its complementary strand on the
`other side of the break. Subsequently.
`through the action of additional essential
`proteins such as Ku70:KuBO (indicated
`in blue) that join the complex (fourth
`panel) along with the RAG proteins. the
`DNA hairpin is cleaved at a random site
`to yield a single-stranded DNA end. This
`and is then modified by the action of
`TdT and exonuciease (indicated in pink.
`titth panel). which randomly creates
`diverse. imprecise ends. Finally (sixth
`panel) the two heptamer sequences,
`which are not modiiied. are ligated to
`form the precise signal joint. while the
`coding joint is also ligated, both by the
`action of DNA iigase iV.
`
`head-to-head fashion to form a signal joint in a circular piece of extra-
`chromosomal DNA, which is lost from the genome when the cell divides. The
`V and I gene segments. which remain on the chromosome. join to form what
`is called the coding joint. This junction is imprecise. and consequently
`generates much additional variability in the V-region sequence.
`
`The complex of enzymes that act in concert to effect somatic V(D)I recombi-
`nation is termed the V(D)] recombinaee. The products of the two genes
`RAG-1 and HAG-2 (recombination-activating genes) comprise the lymphoid—
`specific components of the recombinase. This pair of genes is only expressed
`in developing lymphocytes while they are engaged in assembling their anti-
`gen receptors, as is described in more detail in Chapter 7. They are essential
`for V(D)I recombination. Indeed, these genes. when expressed together, are
`sufficient to confer on nonlymphoid cells such as fibroblasts the capacity to
`rearrange exogenous segments of DNA that contain appropriate RSSs; this is
`how RAG-1 and RAG-2 were initially discovered.
`
`Although the RAG proteins are required for ViDii recombination, they are not
`the only enzymes in the recombinase. The remaining enzymes are ubiqui—
`tously expressed DNA-modifying proteins that are involved in double-stranded
`DNA repair, DNA bending. or the modification of the ends of the broken DNA
`strands. They include the enzyme DNA iigase W. the enzyme DNA-dependent
`protein kinase (DNA-PK). and Ku, a well-known autoantigen. which is a
`heterodimer (Ku 70:i<u 80) that associates tightly with DNA-PK.
`
`VtDii recombination is a multistep enzymatic process in which the first
`reaction is an endonucleoiytlc cleavage requiring the coordinated activity of
`both RAG proteins. Initially, two RAG protein complexes, each containing
`RAG-1. RAG-2. and high-mobility group proteins, recognize and align the two
`11885 that are guiding the join (see Fig. 4.7). RAG-l is thought to specifically
`recognize the nonarncr of the RSS. At this stage. the 12/23 rule is established
`through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. The endonuclease
`activity of the RAG protein complexes then makes two single-strand DNA
`breaks at sites just 5' of each bound RSS. leaving a free 3’-OH group at the end
`of each coding segment. This 3’-OH group then hydrolyzes the phosphodi-
`ester bond on the other strand. sealing the end of the double-stranded DNA
`to create a DNA ‘hairpin' out of the gene segment coding region. This process
`simultaneously creates a flush double-stranded break at the ends of the two
`heptamer signal sequences. The DNA ends do not float apart, however. but
`are held tightly in a complex by the RAG proteins and other associated DNA
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1039, p. 13
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1039, p. 13
`
`

`

`
`
`The generation of diversity In lmmunoglobuilns 131}
`
`repair enzymes until the join is completed. The two 11885 are precisely joined
`to form the signal joint. Coding joint formation is more complex. First, the
`DNA hairpin is nicked open by a single-stranded break. again by the RAG
`proteins. The tricking can happen at various points along the hairpin. which
`leads to sequence variability in the eventual joint. The DNA repair enzymes
`in the complex then modify the opened hairpins by removing nucleotides (by
`exonuclease activity) and by randomly adding nucleotides (by terminal
`deoxynucl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket