throbber
THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`CHAHLIB A JANEWAY PAUL TRAVIRB
`
`I N I
`
`:
`
`a.-
`
`la
`
`ll
`
`I.
`
`
`
`ME?“it?
`
`E g
`
`. 9 I
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`immuno
`iologye
`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DIEEABE
`
`Charles A. Janaway, Jr.
`
`Yale University School of Medicine
`
`Paul Travers
`
`Anthony Nolan Research Institute. London
`
`I
`
`Mark Walpart
`
`Imperial College School of Medicine. London
`
`I
`
`Mark J. Shlomehik
`
`Yale University School of Medioine
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 2
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 2
`
`

`

`Vice President:
`Text Elmore:
`Managing Editor:
`Editorial Assistant:
`Managing Production Editor:
`Production Assistant:
`New Nadia Edltor:
`Copyeditor:
`Indexer:
`Illustration and Layout:
`lilanutaoturing:
`
`Denise Schanck
`Penetopo Austin. Eleanor Lawrence
`Sarah Gibbs
`Mark Ditzal
`Emma Hunt
`Angela Bennett
`Michael Morales
`Len Cegiefita
`Liza Fumival
`Blink Studio. London
`Marlon Morrow. Flory MacDonald
`
`Q 2001 by Garland Publishing.
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced. stored In a retrieval
`system or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic. mechanical. photocopying.
`recording. or otherwise—Mlhout the prior written permission oi the copyright holder.
`
`Distributors:
`Inside North America: Garland Publishing, 29 West 35th Street,
`New York. NY 10001 -2299.
`Inside Japan: Nankodo Co. Ltd, 42-6. Hongo 3-Chrome. Bunkyo—ku.
`Tokyo. 113-8410. Japan.
`Ornside North America and Japan: Churchill Livingstone. Hebert Stevenson House.
`14 Baxter's Place. Leith Walk. Edinburgh. EH1 W.
`
`ISBN 0 8153 3642 X (paperback) Garland
`tSBN o 4430 11393 9 (paperback) Churchill Livingstone
`ISBN 0 4430 7099 7 {paperback} International Student Edition
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in—Publiootion Date
`Immunobiology : the immune system in health and disease 1" Charles A. Jar-sway. Jr.
`[at al.].-- 5th ed.
`p. cm.
`Includes blbllographicei references and index.
`ISBN 0-3153-3642-X (plain)
`1. immunology. 2. Immunity. i. Janeway. Chariea it. Title.
`
`QFIIB1 .l454 2001
`613.0?94021
`
`2001016039
`
`This book was produced using Quaanpreea 4.1 t and Adobe Illustrator 9.0
`
`Published by Garland Publishing. a member of the Taylor 5. Francis Group.
`29 West 35m Street. New York. NY 10001-2299.
`
`Printed in the United States of Antenna.
`15141312111098765432
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 3
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`PART I
`
`AN INTRODUCTION TO IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND INNATE IMMUNITY
`
`Chapter 1
`
`Basic Concepts in Immunology
`
`Chapter 2
`
`Innate Immunity
`
`PART II
`
`THE RECOGNITION OF ANTIGEN
`
`Chapter 3
`
`Antigen Recognition by B-ceII and T-cell Receptors
`
`Chapter 4
`
`The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`
`Chapter 5
`
`Antigen Presentation to T Lymphocytes
`
`PART III
`
`THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATURE LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR
`REPERTOIRES
`
`Index
`
`Chapter 6
`
`Signaling Through Immune System Receptors
`
`Chapter 7
`
`The Development and Survival of Lymphocytes
`
`PART IV
`
`THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSE
`
`Chapter 8
`
`T Cell-Mediated Immunity
`
`Chapter 9
`
`The Humoral Immune Response
`
`Chapter 10 Adaptive Immunity to Infection
`
`PART V
`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Failures of Host Defense Mechanisms
`
`Chapter 12 Allergy and Hypersensitivity
`
`Chapter 13 Autoimmunity and Transplantation
`
`Chapter 14 Manipulation of the Immune Response
`
`Afterward Evolution of the Immune System: Past, Present, and Future,
`by Charles A. Janeway, Jr.
`
`Appendix I
`
`Immunologists‘ Toolbox
`
`Appendixll CD Antigens
`
`Appendix III Cytokines and their Receptors
`
`Appendix IV Chemokines and their Receptors
`
`Appendix V
`
`Immunological Constants
`
`Biographies
`
`Glossary
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 4
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 4
`
`

`

`
`II
`
`THE RECOGNITION
`
`OF ANTIGEN
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 5
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 5
`
`

`

`“I
`
`Antigen Recognition by B-cell
`and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`
`
`We have learned in Chapter 2 that the body is defended by innate immune
`responses. but these will only work to control pathogens that have certain
`molecular patterns or that induce interferons and other secreted yet non-
`specific defenses. Most crucially. they do not allow memory to form as they
`operate by receptors that are coded in the genome. 'l'hus. innate immunity is
`good for preventing pathogens from growing freely in the body. but it does
`not lead to the most important feature of adaptive immunity. which is long-
`lasting memory of specific pathogen.
`
`the wide range of pathogens an individual will
`To recognize and tight
`encounter, the lymphocytes of the adaptive Immune system have evolved to
`recognize a great variety of different antigens from bacteria. viruses. and
`other disease-causing organisms. The antigen-recognition molecules of B
`cells are the immunoglobulins, or lg. These proteins are produced by B cells
`in a vast range of antigen specificities. each B cell producing immunogiobulin
`of a single specificity [see Sections 1-8 to 140]. Membrane-bound
`immunoglobulin on the B-ceil surface serves as the cell’s receptor for and
`gen. and is known as the B-oeil receptor (BCR). immunogiobulin of the same
`antigen specificity is secreted as antibody by terminally differentiated B
`cells—the plasma cells. The secretion of antibodies. which bind pathogens or
`their toxic products in the extracellular spaces of the body, is the main effector
`function of B cells in adaptive immunity.
`
`Antibodies were the first molecules involved in specific immune recognition to
`be characterized and are still the best understood. The antibody molecule has
`two separate functions: one is to bind specifically to molecules from the
`pathogen that elicited the immune response; the other is to recruit other cells
`and molecules to destroy the pathogen once the antibody is bound to it. For
`example. binding by antibody neutralizes viruses and marks pathogens for
`destruction by phagocytes and Complement. as described in Section 1-14.
`These functions are structurally separated in the antibody molecule. one part
`of which specifically recognizes and binds to the pathogen or antigen whereas
`the other engages different effector mechanisms. The antigen-binding region
`varies extensively between antibody molecules and is thus known as the
`variable region or V region. The variability of antibody molecules allows each
`antibody to bind a different specific antigen. and the total repertoire of anti»
`bodies made by a single individual is large enough to ensure that virtually any
`structure can be recognized. The region of the antibody molecule that engages
`the effector functions ofthe immune system does not vary in the same way and
`is thus known as the constant region or C region. It comes in five main forms.
`which are each specialized for activating different effector mechanisms. The
`membrane-bound B-cell receptor does not have these effector functions. as
`the C region remains inserted in the membrane of the B cell. Its function is as
`a receptor that recognizes and binds antigen by the V regions exposod on
`the surface of the cell. thus transmitting a signal that causes B-cell activation
`leading to clonal expansion and specific antibody production.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 6
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`04
`
`Chapter 3: Antigen Recognition by Scott and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`
`
`N terminus
`
`bonds Constant
`
`deullide
`
`region
`
`0 Iennirrus
`
`
`Fig. 3.1 Structure 01 an antibody
`molecule. Panel a illustrates a
`ribbon diagram based on the X-ray
`crystallographic structure of an IgG
`antibody. showing the course of the
`backbones ol the polypeptide chains.
`Three globular regions form a Y. The
`two antigsnbindlng sites are at the tips
`of the arms. which are tethered to the
`trunk of the Y by a flexible hinge region.
`A schematic representation of the
`structure in a is given in panel b.
`illustrating the tour-chain composition
`and the separate domains comprising
`each chain. Panel c shows a simplified
`schematic representation oi an antibody
`molecule that will be used throughout
`this book. Photograph courtesy of
`A. McPherson and L. Harris.
`
`r_
`
`The antigen~recognition molecules of T cells are made solely as membrane“
`bound proteins and only function to signal '1‘ cells for activation. These
`T-cell receptors (TCRs) are related to immunoglobulins both in their protein
`stntcture—having both V and C regions—and in the genetic mechanism that
`produces their great variability (see Section 1-10 and Chapter 4]. However.
`the T-cell receptor diliers from the B-cell receptor in an important way:
`it does not recognize and bind antigen directly. but instead recognizes short
`peptide fragments of pathogen protein antigens. which are bound to MHC
`molecules on the surfaces of other cells.
`
`The MHC molecules are glycoproteins encoded in the large cluster of genes
`known as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (see Sections 1~16
`and l-l'r‘]. Their most striking structural feature is a cleft running across
`their outermost surface. in which a variety of peptides can be bound. As We
`shall discuss further in Chapter 5. MHC molecules show great genetic varia—
`tion in the population. and each individual carries up to 12 of the possible
`variants. which increases the range of pathogen-derived peptides that can
`be bound. T-cell receptors recognize features both of the peptide antigen
`and of the MHC molecule to which it is bound. This introduces an extra
`
`dimension to antigen recognition by T cells. known as MHC restriction.
`because any given Tvcell receptor is specific not simply for a foreign peptide
`antigen. but for a unique combination of a peptide and a particular MHC
`molecule. The ability of T—cell receptors to recognize MHC molecules. and
`their selection during T-cell development for the ability to recognize the
`particular MHC molecules expressed by an individual. are topics we shall
`return to in Chapters 5 and 7.
`
`In this chapter we focus on the structure and antigen-binding pr0perties of
`immunoglobulins and T~cell receptors. Although B cells andT cells recognize
`foreign molecules in two distinct fashions. the receptor molecules they use
`for this task are very similar in structure. We will see how this basic structure
`can accommodate great variability in antigen specificity. and how it enables
`immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors to carry out their functions as the
`antigen-recognition moleCules of the adaptive immune response.
`
`Theeshucture ot a "typical,.an't'_l'b'_otly-=molecul_e._
`
`Antibodies are the secreted form of the B-cell receptor. An antibody is identical
`to the B-cell receptor of the cell that secretes it except for a small portion of
`the C-terminus of the heavy-chain constant region. In the case of the B-cell
`receptor the C-terminus is a hydrophobic membrane—anchoring sequence.
`and in the case of antibody it is a hydrophilic sequence that allows secretion.
`Since they are soluble, and secreted in large quantities. antibodies are easily
`obtainable and easily studied. For this reason. most of what we know about
`the B—cell recaptor comes from the study of antibodies.
`
`Antibody molecules are roughly Y-shaped molecules consisting of three
`equal-sized portions. loosely connected by a flexible tether. Three schematic
`representations of antibody structure, which has been determined by X-ray
`crystallography. are shown in Fig. 3.1. The aim of this part ofthe chapter is to
`explain how this structure is formed and how it allows antibody molecules to
`carry out their dual tasks—binding on the one hand to a wide variety of anti—
`gens. and on the other hand to a limited number of effector molecules and
`cells. As we will see. each of these tasks is carried out by separable parts of the
`molecule. The two arms of the Y end in regions that vary between different
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 7
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 7
`
`

`

`The structure oi atypical aiiflbody molecule
`
`
`
`
`antibody molecules, the V regions. These are involved in antigen binding,
`whereas the stern of the Y. or the C region. is far less variable and is the part
`that interacts with effector cells and molecules.
`
`All antibodies are constructed in the same way from paired heavy and light
`polypeptide chains, and the generic term immunoglobulin is used for all such
`proteins. Within this general category, however, five different classes of
`immunoglobulins—IgM, IgD,
`lgG, IgA, and igE—can be distinguished by
`their C regions. which will be described more fully in Chapter 4. More sublle
`differences confined to the V region account for the specificity of antigen
`binding. We will use the IgG antibody molecule as an example to describe the
`general structural features of lmmunoglobulins.
`
`3.1
`
`lgG antibodies consist of tour polypeptide chains.
`
`lgG antibodies are large moleculu, having a molecular might of approximately
`150 kDa. composed of mo different kinds of polypeptide chain. One, of
`approximately 50 kDa, is termed the heavy or H chain, and the other, of 25
`kDa, is termed the light or L chain (Fig. 3.2). Each IgG molecule consists of
`two heavy chains and two light chains. The two heavy chains are linked to
`each other by disulfide bonds and each heavy chain is linked to a light chain
`by a disulfide bond. In any given immunoglobuiin molecule, the mo heavy
`chains and the two light chains are identical, giving an antibody molecule
`two identical antigen-binding sites (see Fig. 3.1), and thus the ability to bind
`simultaneously to two identical structures.
`
`Two types oflight chain, termed lambda [7L] and kappa [it], are found in anti-
`bodies. A given irn munoglobulin either has it chains or it chains, never one of
`each. No functional difference has been found between antibodies having it
`or K light chains, and either type of light chain may be found in antibodies of
`any of the five major classes. The ratio of the two types of light chain varies
`from species to species. In mice, the average it to 1 ratio is 20: 1. whereas in
`humans it
`is 2:1 and in cattle it is 1:20. The reason for this variation
`is unknown. Distortions of this ratio can sometimes be used to detect
`
`the abnormal proliferation of a clone of B cells. These would all express the
`identical light chain, and thus an excess 051 light chains in a person might
`indicate the presence of a B-cell tumor producing 7t chains.
`
`By contrast. the class, and thus the effector function. of an antibody. is defined
`by the structure of its heavy chain. There are five main heavy~chain classes or
`lsotypes, some of which have several subtypes. and these determine the func-
`tional activity of an antibody molecule. The five major classes oflmmunoglob—
`ulin are immtmoglobulln M (13M), immunoglobulin D (IgD), immunoglobulin
`G [IgGL immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin E [lgE}. Their heavy
`chains are denoted by the corresponding lower-case Greek letter to, 5, 7. 0t,
`and E. respectively] . lgG is by far the most abundant immunoglobulin and has
`several subclasses [IgGl, 2, 3, and 4 in humans). Their distinctive functional
`Properties are conferred by the carboxy— terminal part of the heavy chain,
`Where it is not associated with the light chain. We will describe the structure
`and hmctions of the different heavy-chain isotypes in Chapter 4. The general
`Snuctural features of all the isotypes are similar and we will consider IgG. the
`1Mist abundant isotype in plasma. as a typical antibody molecule.
`
`Fig. 3.2 Immumglobulin molecules
`Ire composed of two types of protein
`chain: heavy chains and light chains.
`Each ll‘l'Imunoglobulin molecule ls made
`“9 0! Mo heavy chains {green} and two
`
`light chains (yellow) joined by disuliida
`bonds so that each heavy chain is linked
`to a light chain and the two heavy chains
`are linked together.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 8
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CW3: Antlgan Recognition by 3-09]! and T-cell Receptors
`
`3-2
`
`lmmunoglobuiin heavy and light chains are composed of constant
`and variable regions.
`
`The amino acid sequences of many immunoglobulin heavy and light chains
`have been determined and reveal two important features of antibody mole-
`cules. First. each chain consists of a series of similar. although not identical,
`sequences, each about 110 amino acids long. Each of these repeats corre-
`sponds to a discrete, compactly folded region of protein structure known as
`a protein domain. The light chain is made up of two such immunoglobulin
`domains. whereas the heavy chain of the IgG antibody contains four {see Fig
`3.1a]. This suggests that the immunoglobulin chains have evolved by repeated
`duplication of an ancestral gene corresponding to a single domain.
`
`The second important feature revealed by comparisons of amino acid
`sequences is that the amino-terminal sequences of both the heavy and light
`chains vary greatly between different antibodies. The variability in sequence
`is limited to approximately the first 110 amino acids. corresponding to the
`first domain. whereas the remaining domains are constant bemeen
`Immune-globulin chains of the same isotype. The amino-terminal variable or
`V domains of the heavy and light chains NH and V[_, respectively] together
`make up the V region of the antibody and confer on it the ability to bind
`specific antigen. while the constant domains (C domains) of the heavy and
`light chains {CH and CL. respectively) make up the C region (see Fig. 3.1b. c).
`The multiple heavy-chain C domains are numbered from the amino-terminal
`end to the carboxy terminus. for example CHI. C32. and so on.
`
`3-8
`
`The antibody molecule can readily be cleaved Into functionally
`distinct fragments.
`
`The protein domains described above associate to form larger globular
`domains. Thus. when fully folded and assembled. an antibody molecule
`comprises three equal-sized globular portions joined by a flexible stretch of
`polypeptide chain known as the hinge region (see Fig. 3.11:}. Each arm of this
`Y-shaped structure is formed by the association of a light chain with the
`amino-terminal half of a heavy chain. whereas the trunk of the Y is formed by
`the pairing of the carbon-terminal halves of the two heavy chains. The asso-
`ciation of the heavy and light chains is such that the V1.1 and VL domains are
`paired. as are the CH1 and CL domains. The CH3 domains pair with each other
`but the C32 domains do not interact; carbohydrate side chains attached to
`the C32 domains lie between the two heavy chains. The two antigembinding
`sites are formed by the paired VH and V1, domains at the ends of the two arms
`of the Y {see Fig. 3.11)).
`
`Proteolytic enzymes (proteases) that cleave polypeptide sequences have been
`used to dissect the structure of antibody molecules and to determine which
`parts of the molecule are responsible for its various functions. Limited digestion
`with the protease pepsin cleaves antibody molecules into three fragments
`(Fig. 3.3}. Two fragments are identical and contain the antigen-binding activity-
`These are termed the Fab fragments. for Fragment antigen binding. The Fab
`fragments correspond to the two identical arms of the antibody molecule,
`which contain the complete light chains paired with the V" and CHI domains
`of the heavy chains. The other fragment contains no antigen-binding activitl'r
`but was originally observed to crystallize readily. and for this reason was
`named the Fc fragment. for Fragment crystallizabie. This fragment corre-
`sponds to the paired (1.42 and CHS domains and is the part of the antibody
`molecule that interacts with effector molecules and cells. The functional
`differences between heavy-chain isotypes lie mainly in the Fc fragment.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 9
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`The structure at a typical antibody mime
`
`
`Flg. 3.3 The Y-shaped Immunoglobu-
`
`Iin molecule can be dissected by
`partial digestion with pretenses.
`Papsln cleaves the immunogiobulin
`molecule into three places. two Fab
`iregmenis and one Fe fragment (upper
`panels). The Feb fragment contains the
`V regions and binds antigen. The Ft:
`iragment is crystallizabie and contains 0
`regions. Pepsin cleaves immunoglobuiin
`to yield one Flair): fragment and many
`small pieces of the Fc fragment, the
`largest of which is called the ch’ trsg-
`ment (lower panels). Home is written
`with a prime because it contains a law
`more amino acids than Fab. including
`the cysteines that form the disuiflde
`bonds.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`!
`-
`
`
`
`The protein fragments obtained afierproteolysis are determined byud'rere the
`protease cuts the antibody molecule in relation to the disulfide bonds that link
`
`the two heavy chains. These lie in the hinge region heaveen the CH1 and Caz
`domains and, as illustrated in Fig. 3.3, pepsin cleaves the antibody molecule
`on the amino-terminal side of the disulfide bonds. This releases the two arms
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the antibody as separate Fab fragments, whereas in the Fc fragment the
`Wherry-terminal halves of the heavy chains remain linked.
`
`another protease. pepsin, cuts in the same general region of the antibody
`molecule as pepsin but on the carboxy-terminal side of the disulfide bonds
`(See Fig. 3.3). This produces a fragment, the Ftah’la fragment. in which the
`MD antigen-binding arms of the antibody molecule remain linked. In this
`case the remaining part of the heavy chain is cut into several small fragments.
`The Half}; fragment has exactly the some antigen-binding characteristics as
`the original antibody but is unable to interact with any effector molecule. it is
`thus of potential valuein therapeutic applications of antibodies as well as in
`research into the functional role of the Fc portion.
`
`Genetic engineering techniques also now permit the construction of many
`diiierent antibody-related molecules. One important type is a truncated Feb
`comprising only the V domain of a heavy chain linked by a stretch of
`ii.‘intltetitr peptide to n v domain of a light chain. This is called sings-chain Fv.
`named From Fragment variable. Fv molecules may become valuable theta-
`heath: agents because of their small size, which allows them to penetrate
`tissues readily. They can be coupled to protein toxins to yield inununotorrins
`Wm"! Potential application, for example. in tumor therapy in the case of a Fv
`aIliftiifit: for a tumor antigen [see Chapter 14).
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 10
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 10
`
`

`

`
`
`Chapter 3: Antigen Matthieu by B-oeil end T-oell Receptors
`
`
`
`3-4 mmmunoglobulin molecule is flexible. especially at the hinge
`
`n.
`
`The hinge region that links the Fe and Fab portions of the antibody molecule
`is in' reality a flexible tether. allowing independent movement of the two Fab
`arms. rather than a rigid hinge. This has been demonstrated by electron
`microscopy of antibodies bound to haptens. These are small molecules of
`various sorts. typically about the size of a tyrosine side chain. They can be
`recognized by antibody but are only able to stimulate production of anti-
`hapten antibodies when linked to a larger protein carrier [see Appendix i.
`Section A-l]. An antigen made of two identical hapten molecules joined by a
`short fletdble region can link turn or more anti-hapten antibodies. forming
`dimers. trimers.
`ten-emote. and so on. which can be seen by electron
`microscopy (Fig. 3.4]. The shapes formed by these complexes demonstrate
`that antibody molecules are flexible at the hinge region. Some flexibility is
`also found at the junction between the V and C domains. allowing bending
`and rotation of the V domain relative to the C domain. For example. in the
`antibody molecule shown in Fig. 3.1a, not only are the Mo hinge regions
`clearly bent difl‘erently. but the angle between the V and C domains in each of
`the two Fab arms is also different. This range of motion has led to the junction
`between the V and C domains being referred to as a 'molecmar ball-
`and-socket joint.’ Flexibility at both the hinge and V—C junction enables the
`binding of both arms of an antibody molecule to sites that are various
`distances apart. for example, sites on bacterial cell-wall polysaccharides.
`Fletdbility at the hinge also enables the antibodies to interact with the
`andbody—bmding proteins that mediate immune effector mechanisms.
`
` Anglebetweenarntsleo"
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.4 Antibody arms are joined by
`I. flexible hinge. An antigen oonehting
`of two hapten molecules {red balls in
`diagrams} that can cross-ilnk two
`antigen-binding sites is used to create
`antigenmntlbody complexes. wrflch can
`be seen in the electron micrograph.
`Linear. triangular. and square tonne are
`seen. with short projeoiions or spikes.
`Limited pepsin digestion removes these
`spikes (not shown in the figure}, which
`therefore correspond to the Fe portion of
`the antibody; the Fieb’}: pieces remain
`cross-linked by antigen. The Interpre-
`tation oi the oomplexes is show In the
`diagrams. The angle between the suns
`ot the embody molecules varies. from
`0' In the antibody dimers. through 80'
`in the triangular tonne, to 90' in the
`square iomts. showing that the
`connections between the arms are
`flexible. Photograph (1:. 300.000}
`courtesy of NM. Green.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 11
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Thach'ucbtraofatypicaiantlbodymciacule E
`
`35
`
`The contains of an immunoglobulin molecule have similar structures.
`
`As we saw in Section 3-2. immunoglobulin heavy and light chains are
`
`60me of a series of discrete protein domains. These protein domains all
`
`have a similar folded structure. Within this basic three-dimensional struc-
`tore. there are distinct differences between V and C domains. The structural
`
`.gmlarilies and differences can be seen in the diagram of a light chain in Fig.
`1-3.5. Each domain is cooso‘ucted from two [3 sheets. which are elements of
`
`weight structure made up of strands of the polypeptide chain {B strands)
`
`3.... cited together: the sheets are linked by a disulfide bridge and together form
`litmus”? barrel-shaped strttoture. known as a [3 barrel. The distinctive folded
`cture oi'
`the immunoglobulin protein domain is known as the
`
`magnetization fold.
`
`{Both the essential similarity of V and C domains and the critical difi'erence
`
`Wen them are most clearly seen in the bottom panels ofFig. 3.5. where
`-the cylindrical domains are opened out to reveal how the polypeptide chain
`
`fluids to create each of the [5 sheets and how it forms flexible loops as it
`
`.hhanges direction. The main difierence between the V and C domains is that
`‘hevdomain is larger. with an extra loop. We will see in Section 3-6 that the
`sflexihle loops of the V domains form the antigen-binding site of the
`
`. immunoglobulin molecule.
`
`
`
` Fig. 3.5 The atruchire oi immuta-
`
`9lobulin constant and variable
`domains. The upper panels show
`schematically the raiding pattern of the
`constant (C) and variable (V) domains
`of an lmmunoglobulln light chain. Each
`domain is a barrel-shaped structure in
`which strands oi polypeptide chain
`([5 strands) running in opposite directions
`(antiparallai) pack together to form two
`B sheets (shown In yellow and green in
`the diagram of the C domain). which are
`held together by a disulflde bond. The
`way the polypeptide ci'lain folds to give
`the fine] structure can be seen more
`clearly when the sheets are opened
`out. as shown in the lower panels. The
`B strands are lettered sequentially with
`respect to the order at their occurrence
`in the amino acid sequence of the
`domains: the order in each B sheet is
`characteristic of immunoglobulin
`donains. The ii strands C‘ and C" that
`are found in the V domains but not in
`the 0 domains are indicated by a blue
`shaded background. The characteristic
`four-ahead plus three-strand (Ci-region
`type domain) or four-stand plus five-
`slrand (V-reglon type domain) arrange-
`ments are typical lrnmumglohuiin
`superiamily domain bonding blocks.
`found in a whole range of other
`proteins as well as antibodies and
`T-ceil receptors.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 12
`
`.
`
`‘
`‘
`‘
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Chapter 3: Antigen Hamilton by B-celt and T-oall Receptors
`
`
`
`Many of the amino acids that are common to C and V domains of immuno.
`globulin chains lie in the core of the immunoglobulin fold and are critical to
`its stability. For that reason. other proteins having sequences similar to those
`of immunoglobulins are believed to form domains of similar structure. and in
`many cases this has been demonstrated by crystallography. These
`immunoglobulin-like domains are present in many other proteins of the
`immune system. and in proteins involved in cell—cell recognition in the
`nervous system and other tissues. Together with the immunoglobulins and
`the T-cell receptors. they make up the extensive immunuglobufln superfamily.
`
`Summary.
`
`The [36 antibody molecule is made up of four polypeptide chains. comprising
`two identical light chains and two identical heavy chains. and can be thought
`of as forming a flexible Y-s'httped structure. Each of the four chains has a
`variable (V) region at its amino terminus. which contributes to the antigen-
`binding site. and a constant (C) region. which determines the isolype. The
`isotype of the heavy chain determines the functional properties of the
`antibody. The light chains are bound to the heavy chains by many non-
`covalent interactions and by disulfide bonds. and the V regions of the heavy
`and light chains pair in each arm of the Y to generate two identical antigen-
`binding sites. which lie at the tips of the arms of the Y. The possession oftwo
`antigen-binding sites allovvs antibody molecules to cross-link antigens and to
`bind them much more stably. The tmnlt of the Y. or Fc fragment. is composed
`of the coronary-terminal domains orthe heavy chains. lolning the arms of the
`Y to the tnmk are the flexible hinge regions. The Fc fragment and hinge
`regions differ in antibodies of different isotypes.
`thus determining their
`functional properties. However. the overall organization of the domains is
`similar in all isotypes.
`
`Theintermfonpftheanflbodymoleculewlih
`smiles-oer:
`
`We have described the structure of the antibody molecule and how the V
`regions of the heavy and light chains fold and pair to form the antigen-binding
`site. In this part of the chapter we will look at the antigen-binding site in more
`detail. We will discuss the different ways in which antigens can bind to anti-
`body and address the question of how variation in the sequences of the
`antibody V domains determines the specificity for antigen.
`
`3-6
`
`Localized regions of hypervarieble sequence form the antigen-
`bintling site.
`
`The V regions ofany given antibody molecule differ from those ofevery other.
`Sequence variability is not, however. distributed evenly throughout the V
`regions but is concentrated in certain segments of the V region. The distribution
`ofvariable amino acids can be seen clearly in what is termed a variability plot
`(Fig. 3.6). in which the amino acid sequences of many different antibody
`V regions are compared. Three segments of particular variability can be
`identified in both the V“ and VL domains. They are designated hypervariable
`regions and are denoted HVI, HVZ. and HUB. in the light chains these are
`roughly from residues 28 to 35. from 49 to 59. and from 92 to 103. respectively.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 13
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 13
`
`

`

`The Interaction oithe antibody molecule with specific antigen
`
`
`
`204030501me
`Residue
`
`6080103120
`Herbie
`
`The most variable part of the domain is in the HVB region. The regions
`between the hypervariable regions. which comprise the rest of the V domain,
`show less variability and are termed the framework regions. There are four
`such regions in each V domain. designated FRI. F112. PBS. and FR4.
`
`The framework regions form the [3 sheets that provide the structural frame
`work of the domain. whereas the hyperveriable sequences correspond to
`three loops at the outer edge of the [3 barrei. which are juxtaposed in the folded
`domain (Fig. 3.7]. Thus. not only is sequence diversity concentrated in
`particular parts of the V domain but it is localized to a particular region on the
`surface of the molecule. When the V1.1 and VL domains are paired in the anti-
`body molecule, the hypervariable loops from each domain are brought
`together. creating a single hypervariable site at the tip of each arm of the
`molecule. This is the binding site for antigen. the antigen-binding site or
`antibody combining site. The three hypervariable loops determine antigen
`specificity by forming a surface complementary to the antigen. and are more
`commonly termed the complementarity-determining regions. or CDRs
`[CURL CDRZ. and CD33). Because (mm from both VH and VL domains con-
`tribute to the antigen-binding site. it is the combination of the heavy and the
`light chain. and not either alone. that determines the final antigen specificity.
`Thus, one way in which the immune system is able to generate antibodies
`of different specificities is by generating different combinations of heavy-
`and light-chain V region

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket