throbber
Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 81, pp. 3180-3184, May 1984
`Immunology
`
`Generation of antibody diversity in the immune response of
`BALB/c mice to influenza virus hemagglutinin
`(antibody sequences/antibody genes/somatic mutation)
`DAVID MCKEAN*, KONRAD Huppit, MICHAEL BELL*, LOUIS STAUDTt, WALTER GERHARDt,
`AND MARTIN WEIGERTt§
`*Department of Immunology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN 55901; tThe Institute for Cancer Research, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Philadelphia, PA
`19111; and tWistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, 36th and Spruce Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104
`
`Communicated by Matthew D. Scharff, January 30, 1984
`
`We have examined the amino-terminal se-
`ABSTRACT
`quence of the Kc light chains of a set of monoclonal antibodies
`specific for one of the major antigenic determinants (Sb) on
`the influenza virus PR8[A/PR/8/34(HlNl)J hemagglutinin
`molecule. This set was believed to be structurally related from
`earlier serological analysis that typed these K chains as mem-
`bers of the variable (V) region VK21 group [Staudt, L. M. &
`Gerhard, W. (1983) J. Exp. Med. 157, 678-704]. Our se-
`quence analysis confirms and extends this conclusion; all ex-
`amples of this set belong to a subgroup of the VK21 group,
`V,,21C. A special feature of this set of K light chains is that all
`examples were derived from the same mouse (designated H36).
`This sequence analysis along with the characterization of gene
`rearrangements at the K light chain loci of these hybridomas is
`consistent with the idea that certain members of this set are the
`progeny of one or two lymphocytes. Because of this potential
`clonal relationship, we can reach several conclusions about the
`diversity observed among these K light chains: (') the diversity
`is due to somatic mutation, (it) somatic mutations occur se-
`quentially and accumulate in the first complementarity-deter-
`mining region, and (iii) the extent of somatic variation in this
`sample is high, suggesting a somatic mutation rate of about
`10-3 per base pair per generation.
`
`Antibody diversity arises from several sources. Individuals
`inherit multiple variable (V) region gene segments for both
`heavy (VH) and light (VK, VA) chains, joining (J) gene seg-
`ments (JH, J,, Jh), and diversity (D) gene segments (DH).
`The initial antibody repertoire of an individual is a product of
`the combinatorial joining of these gene segments, i.e., V4s
`with JKS or different VH, DH, and JH combinations, that form
`complete V1 or VH genes. Errors committed during the pro-
`cess of joining contribute additional diversity to this reper-
`toire (reviewed in ref. 1). Finally, that somatic mutation fur-
`ther amplifies this germ-line repertoire seems to be estab-
`lished (2). The original evidence for somatic mutation
`favored a model by which point mutations accumulate se-
`quentially during cell division (3). Other models link somatic
`mutation with specific events during lymphocyte differentia-
`tion (4, 5) and propose cataclysmic mechanisms of mutagen-
`esis that introduce multiple amino acid substitutions in one
`step (6, 7). These models are based on the comparison of V
`region sequences of independently induced plasmacytoma
`and hybridoma antibodies to their putative germ-line coun-
`terparts. Hence, little can be concluded about the time
`course of somatic mutation.
`A better understanding of the nature of somatic mutation
`can be reached by comparisons of the V genes of a cell lin-
`eage. Scharff and colleague have analyzed certain mutants
`and revertants of the cell line S107 and conclude that the in
`
`vitro rate of mutation at the VH gene expressed in this plas-
`macytoma is significantly higher than that of nonimmuno-
`globulin genes (8). A possible in vivo analogy is described
`here: we have initiated a structural comparison of hybrid-
`omas derived from a single mouse and have identified a set
`or sets, the members of which may be clonally related. The
`pattern of variability observed so far suggests that somatic
`mutations accumulate sequentially and that in vivo somatic
`mutation occurs at a high rate.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Anti-Hemagglutinin (HA) Hybridomas. Twenty-four days
`prior to fusion, a BALB/c mouse, H36, was primed by intra-
`peritoneal injection of 1000 hemagglutinating units of PR8.
`Three days prior to fusion, an intravenous injection of the
`same dose of virus was administered. The procedures for
`fusion, in vitro growth, and serological characterization of
`the H36 panel of hybridomas has been described (9). The
`fusion partner was Sp2/0-Agl4 (10).
`Protein Purification and Sequence Analysis. Hybridomas
`were grown in (BALB/c x NZB)F1 mice that had been Pris-
`tane-primed (Aldrich). Immunoglobulins were isolated from
`ascitic fluid by using protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia) (11).
`IgG1 hybridoma antibodies were isolated by twice precipi-
`tating with 50% saturated ammonium sulfate and chromato-
`graphing on a Bio-Gel A-1.5m column (Bio-Rad) in 0.01 M
`sodium phosphate/0.9% sodium chloride/0.01% NaN3, pH
`7.2. Heavy and light chains were separated by Sephadex G-
`100 gel filtration in 6.0 M urea/1.0 M acetic acid after a 90-
`min reduction with 15 mM dithiothreitol and a 60-min alkyl-
`ation with 35 mM iodoacetamide in 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
`at 5.0 mg/ml of protein.
`The strategy for the amino acid sequence determination of
`the VK21C light chains has been reported (12). Briefly, the
`amino-terminal 42-50 residues of each light chain were de-
`termined from sequence analysis of the intact light chain.
`Light chains (H36-15 and H36-18) that contained methionine
`at residue 33 were cleaved with cyanogen bromide, the frag-
`ments from residue 34 to residue 171 were purified on G-50
`Sephadex, and the amino-terminal 40 residues were identi-
`fied by sequence analysis. The light chains H36-5 and H36-7
`were cleaved at tryptophan residues with cyanogen bromide
`(13), the fragment from residue 36 to residue 144 was puri-
`fied on G-50 Sephadex, and the amino-terminal 40 residues
`were identified by sequence analysis. The tryptic fragments
`from residue 69 to residue 100 were isolated from light chains
`H36-5, H36-7, H36-15, and H36-18 on G-50 Sephadex and
`were sequenced completely.
`DNA Hybridization Analysis. The DNA probes were isolat-
`ed from a cloned 12.7-kb fragment containing the constant
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: V, variable; C, constant; D, diversity; J, joining;
`HA, hemagglutinin; kb, kilobase(s).
`§To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`3180
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1034, p. 1
`
`

`

`Immunology: McKean et aL
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 81 (1984)
`
`3181
`
`(C) region K light chain locus (CK) (14). From this cloned
`BamHI fragment, a 0.9-kilobase (kb) EcoRI fragment (desig-
`nated pR1) was subcloned (14), and a 1.1-kb Xba I/HindIII
`fragment (designated IVS) was isolated from a low-tempera-
`ture-melting agarose (Sigma) gel. The physical maps of these
`probes are shown in Figs. 2 and 3 Lower. DNA was isolated
`from hybridomas, plasmacytomas, or 12- to 14-day mouse
`embryos (15). The DNA samples (usually 10 pug) were digest-
`ed to completion with the appropriate restriction enzyme(s)
`(Bethesda Research Laboratories), electrophoresed through
`0.7% agarose, transferred to nitrocellulose paper (Schleicher
`and Schuell), and hybridized to 32P-labeled DNA probes.
`Hybridizations were performed as originally described by
`Southern (16) with the modifications of Wahl et al. (17). Af-
`ter a final wash in 45 mM NaCl/4.5 mM sodium citrate/0. 1%
`sodium dodecyl sulfate for 1 hr at 650C, filters were exposed
`to x-ray film at -70'C.
`
`RESULTS
`The focus of this study is the structure of the K light chains
`from seven hybridomas (H36-1, -4, -5, -7, -15, -17, and -18)
`derived from an individual adult BALB/c mouse, H36. In
`particular, these antibodies bind to the same antigenic re-
`gion, Sb, on the HA molecule of influenza virus but can
`clearly be differentiated from each other by paratypic and
`idiotypic analysis. Tissue culture fluids from six of these hy-
`bridomas were serologically positive for the VK21C subgroup
`of K chains (9). Subsequent serological analysis with purified
`antibody showed that the H36-4 light chain is also cross-re-
`active with VK21C-specific antisera (18). The heavy chain
`isotype of each H36 antibody is shown in Fig. 1.
`A survey of 45 VK21 amino acid sequences from NZB and
`BALB/c plasmacytomas has so far divided the VK21 light
`chain group into eight subgroups, each subgroup being de-
`fined as a set of VK21 chains that share certain amino acid
`residues between positions 1 and 96. The closely related
`VK21B and -C subgroups are defined by the residues indicat-
`
`ed in Fig. 1, and VK21C in turn can be distinguished from
`VK21B by its own characteristic set of amino acid residues
`(12, 21, 22). All of the H36 V region sequences completed so
`far contain the VK21C-specific residues as well as the resi-
`dues shared by the VK21B and VK21C subgroups.
`These sequence data confirm the serological results in
`demonstrating that the H36 VK regions are members of the
`VK21C subgroup. The prototype sequences of the VK21 sub-
`groups were originally defined by recurrent sequences. For
`example, the VK21C prototype sequence (VK21C0) is the se-
`quence shared by 6 of the 12 VK21C light chains from plas-
`macytomas and the anti-HA hybridoma light chain H2-6C4
`(Fig. 1). Prototype sequences are thought to be encoded by
`the VK21 germ-line genes, a conclusion confirmed by the
`DNA sequence of several VK21 genes, including the authen-
`tic VK21CO (20). The H36 VK sequences each differ at multi-
`ple residues from the VK21C0 prototype sequence. Since
`each of the H36 VK sequences share the VK21C subgroup-
`specific residue(s), the substitutions found in the H36 se-
`quences must have resulted from somatic mutation of the
`V,21C0 gene. The only other possibility, namely that these
`sequences are mutants of a second "VK21C-like" germ-line
`gene, is unlikely, as none of the VK21 germ-line genes de-
`fined to date (20, 21) resembles such putative V,2JC-like
`gene products. Furthermore, independently isolated V,21C
`genes in either the unrearranged or aberrantly rearranged
`form code exactly for VK2JC0 (20, 23). Such surveys, being
`independent of light chain expression and hence free of con-
`straints due to selection, should have yielded such V,2JC-
`like genes. Hence, we believe the H-36 K chains are somatic
`mutants of the VK21C0 germ-line gene.
`K Light Chain Gene Rearrangements of the H36 Hybrid-
`omas. A relationship between certain H36 hybridomas has
`been established from the nature of rearrangements at the K
`light chain locus of these cell lines. These rearrangements
`are detectable by Southern blot analysis of hybridoma DNA
`digests using as probes segments of DNA near JK (IVS and
`
`1
`1
`2 2
`2
`2 3
`4
`3
`4
`1 ...5....0O....5 ....0.... 5.7....8.0 .... 5....0.... 5.
`
`1
`1
`1
`6
`9
`8
`8
`7
`5
`7
`5
`9
`6
`0
`0
`0
`.0.... 5....0.... 5....0.... 5....0....5....0.... 5....0 ....5..8
`
`CDRI
`
`CDR2
`
`CDR3
`
`IgA
`
`+
`+
`*
`*
`*
`+
`*
`+
`DIVLTQSPASLAVSLGQRATISCRASESVDSYGNSFMHWYQQKPGQPPKLLIYRASNLESG IPARFSGSGSRTDFTLTINPVEADDVATYYCQQSNEDFtYTFGGGTKLEIKR
`Iga--------------
`IKG2a.---..----------------------------------------------.-----__
`__F--S------
`___----------------_ F---S----
`-_
`-_- --S--
`
`_
`
`---------
`
`Till
`3741
`Al7
`2242
`10916
`M321
`T124
`8982
`8153
`
`H36-7
`H36-5
`H36-17
`H36-4
`H36-1
`H36-15
`H36-18
`
`IgA
`
`IgG3
`IgG3
`IgG3
`
`1-1
`
`,.Z..,
`
`ii--- t
`H-
`. ------ V- lFr DNI)
`- .----------
`IgGI
`r--------_-- -s--)---- -4
`. --------- ---------------
`IgG2a
`Ig G2a ----
`
`-
`
`-J fl-F I----------------------
`
`
`
`-----------______-
`
`____________________-____
`
`V J
`
`H2-6C4 IgM
`
`Amino-terminal sequences of the K light chains from H36 anti-HA (Sb) hybridomas and VK21C-expressing plasmacytomas. The Tll1
`FIG. 1.
`sequence (12), noted by the one letter code of Dayhoff (19), is identical to the V region sequence encoded by the VK21C germ-line gene (20).
`Dashed lines represent amino acid sequence identities with the VK21C prototype sequence. Overbars delineate the regions of the K light chain
`complementarity-determining (hypervariable) regions. Residues 30, 68, 74, and 80 (+) are the set of residues that is uniquely shared by the
`closely related VK21C and VK21B subgroups (21); residues 50, 58, 76, and 83 (*) are the set of residues that together defines the members of the
`VK21C subgroup. Encircled residues are substitutions unique to a given VK21C light chain; residues in boxes are substitutions shared between
`the light chains. Plasmacytoma sequences are taken from refs. 12, 21, and 22. M321 and T124 are Bence-Jones proteins. The PC8153 amino acid
`sequence is translated from the VK gene expressed in this plasmacytoma (unpublished data). The sequence of H2-6C4 is from ref. 12.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1034, p. 2
`
`

`

`3182
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 81 (1984)
`Immunology: McKean etaLP
`
`Lo - ,;I m
`f,
`c)
`rl-
`U-
`7
`7
`7
`r) r) rPO rorOr
`n <
`T I I I II I Co
`
`*
`
`12.7kb -
`
`I-uCO
`U
`
`Em
`
`.I---
`
`F
`o
`u
`Li
`
`E
`0
`mn
`
`1 kb
`i a:FE
`o
`o
`u u
`LU
`Lu
`_IL
`
`IZZZZZZ_ ----rfl~r
`
`p R
`
`Detection of upstream (U) K light chain gene segments in
`FIG. 3.
`the H36 hybridomas. Southern blot of BamHI-digested DNA from
`hybridomas hybridized with the pRI probe. All hybridomas share a
`12.7-kb band corresponding in size to the K1, BamHI fragment that
`includes upstream DNA. This could originate from the H36 hybrid-
`omas and/or contaminating host tissue in these in vivo grown cell
`lines. H36-1, -4, -15, and -18 share a unique band (labeled U) hybrid-
`izing with the pR1 probe. The star denotes a faint, reproducible frag-
`ment in the H37 hybridoma.
`
`bridomas is significant because, in a survey of 75 plasmacy-
`tomas and hybridomas of independent origin, no three
`examples chosen at random had the same sizeK-fragment
`(unpublished data).
`The DNA upstream of JK in the H36 hybridomas was ana-
`lyzed with the pR1 fragment as a probe (Fig. 3). This region
`of the K locus is often retained in hybridomas and plasmacy-
`tomas and is found in BamHI fragments of a unique size rela-
`tive to the germ-line fragment (24). Four of the H36 series
`(H36-18, -15, -1, and -4) have indistinguishable upstream ele-
`ments. H36-7 has a unique upstream element. This is seen as
`a faint band (marked by a star in Fig. 3). Because the hybrid-
`ization to this fragment is weak, we believe this may be due
`to a contaminating subpopulation of cells in the H36-7 line.
`As in the case of K- fragments, the equivalent size of up-
`stream elements is a significant feature of this set of hybrid-
`omas as compared to plasmacytomas and hybridomas of in-
`dependent origin.
`For comparison, other PR8 HA-specific hybridomas have
`been analyzed (unpublished data). These include examples
`typed as VK21C but from different fusions and non-VK21C
`examples from the H36 fusion. The size of the K+ rearrange-
`ments of these VK21C examples is consistent with a VK21C
`rearrangement to JK gene segments other than JK2, whereas
`non-VK21C examples do not coincide with any VK2JC-JK re-
`arrangement. K- and upstream fragments are usually of dif-
`ferent sizes in independently derived examples. Certain hy-
`bridomas derived from the same fusion do share K- and up-
`stream fragments (H37-63 and H37-77 or H36-101, -12 and
`-6; ref. 9) as in the case of the examples from the H36 VK21C
`series.
`
`DISCUSSION
`In adult BALB/c mice, the secondary antibody repertoire to
`the influenza virus HA is large. Based on the repeat frequen-
`cy of isolation of paratypically indistinguishable hybridoma
`antibodies from different mice, one can estimate that
`BALB/c mice are able to produce at least 300 different anti-
`
`pR1, Figs. 2 and 3). The rearrangement bearing the produc-
`tive K light chain allele (K+) has been examined in BamHI/
`HindIII double digests of H36 hybridoma DNA. Since the
`VK2JC gene contains two BamHI sites that map to amino
`acid residues 60 and 95 of this subgroup (20), the K+ rear-
`rangement is seen as a 3- to 4-kb fragment by using the IVS
`probe (Fig. 2). Most of the H36 hybridomas have K+ rear-
`rangements that are indistinguishable from that of the VK21C
`(JK2) plasmacytoma PC3741 and clearly distinguishable from
`the VK21C gene rearranged to the other J!K genes (Fig. 2).
`This analysis further supports the premise that the VK2JC
`gene codes for the H36 light chains. That all examples are
`rearranged to JK2 also supports the relatedness of this set of
`antibodies since JK2 per se is not a prerequisite for HA(Sb)
`binding (i.e., the VK21C hybridoma, H2-6C4; Fig. 1). How-
`ever, the BamHI/HindIII rearrangements of two H36 hy-
`bridomas are not exactly the same: H36-17 is slightly larger
`and H36-7 is slightly smaller than the characteristic VK21C-
`JK2 rearrangement. The reason for the larger size of H36-17
`is a point mutation that obliterates the BamHI site coding for
`residue 95 (unpublished data). The reason for the smaller
`size of H36-7 is not known.
`This analysis (Figs. 2 and 4) also identifies the silent K light
`chain allele. Typically this allele is either unrearranged (K0)
`or aberrantly rearranged (K-). Three of the H36 hybridomas
`have indistinguishable K- alleles (H36-15, -1, and -4). Two
`examples (H36-5 and H36-18) have unique K- alleles, and
`two examples (H36-7 and -17) may have KO alleles or may
`have lost the K- chromosome. K- alleles in hybridomas and
`plasmacytomas of independent origin are usually on differ-
`ent-size IVS-positive fragments (24, 25). That the K- rear-
`rane.ements are of the same size in the H36-15. -1 and -4 hv-
`
`".% _.,..%
`
`U
`
`NJ
`z
`
`V
`UV
`NJr NJ
`7
`z
`
`N
`:1
`
`I
`
`rs-
`(LU
`ff
`I
`
`'
`LU
`VI
`a
`I
`
`-
`
`(0
`ml
`I
`
`LU
`rO
`
`LU
`rO
`I I
`
`LU
`r)
`
`I
`
`n
`m
`
`CI
`
`0S')
`
`a.
`
`WI;
`
`t.
`
`.00
`-0,..*, A.., -, 4
`
`AM ..:
`"10
`
`I+,.K~
`
`?21CJK1gII_
`V21CJ,<2
`
`V21CJK3-
`
`V2ICJK4-
`
`*
`
`S
`
`E
`I
`O
`cn
`
`0 U
`i-
`..,
`-I-
`x I-
`
`O
`D
`x
`
`0-0
`
`_0
`
`XI I I
`
`.. L...
`
`-.
`
`LI
`
`I T
`
`I
`JK
`
`kb
`
`--i
`
`CK
`
`m
`
`O
`
`I
`K
`
`'vs~IJ
`
`hybridomas and
`K light chain rearrangements in the H36 I
`FIG. 2.
`I-digested DNA
`plasmacytomas. Southern blots of BamHI/HindIII
`Lrison of VK21C
`were hybridized with the IVS probe. (Left) Compa
`plasmacytomas in which each plasmacytoma V,,2J(
`, gene has been
`shown to be joined to a different JK gene by aminc
`acid seauence
`(21, 22). (Right) Comparison of the H36 hybridoma
`,s. The K+ allele
`from H36-1, -4, -5, -17, and -18 was identified by the
`DNA sequence
`rearrangement
`of this rearrangement (unpublished data). The K'
`usually corresponds in size to the VC21C-JK2 rearra
`Lngement of the
`plasmacytoma, NZPC 3741. The K( fragment is ide
`ntified by com-
`parison to the BALB/c embryo DNA digest. The KO
`'fragment is ob-
`ccontaminating
`served in all DNAs in part because of host tissue
`these in vivo grown hybridomas and plasmacytoma
`,s.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1034, p. 3
`
`

`

`Immunology: McKean et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984)
`
`3183
`
`between the members of this set. Such parallel replacements
`are infrequent among VK21 or VA variants. This large number
`of common replacements could result from independent anti-
`gen selection for particular VK21C light chain sequences that
`are required (in conjunction with certain VH regions) for the
`formation of HA (Sb)-specific antibody combining sites.
`However, similar substitutions have not been observed so
`far in VK21C chains of anti-HA (Sb) antibodies from hybrid-
`omas of independent origin (H2-6C4, Fig. 1; unpublished
`data). Nevertheless, we cannot formally exclude this possi-
`bility because the isolated H chain of H36-15 could be shown
`to physically associate with an isolated VK21C0-JK2 chain
`(PC 3741), yet failed to produce HA (Sb)-binding antibodies
`(unpublished data).
`An alternative explanation for the common replacements
`is that these H36 hybridomas originated from just one or two
`lymphocyte precursors and that the shared substitutions rep-
`resent the sequential accumulation of mutations in their
`progeny. One possible genealogical relationship of the H36 K
`light chains to the ancestral V,,2JC0 germ-line gene is shown
`in Fig. 4. In this model the H36 sequences initially diverged
`from VK21C0 by the glycine-to-aspartic acid substitution at
`position 29. The branches of this tree represent substitutions
`acquired at early generations, and each K chain has a differ-
`ent terminus because all H36 K chains have one or more
`unique substitutions. By this model, the number of indepen-
`dent, parallel substitutions is reduced to two examples.
`That at least some of these H36 fusants may stem from a
`common precursor is suggested by the nature of rearrange-
`ments at the K locus other than the productive VK2JC-hJ2
`rearrangement. Two sorts of rearrangements have been ana-
`lyzed. One type is of the DNA upstream of the JK locus. This
`DNA is often retained in lymphocyte lines but in a unique
`context compared to germ-line DNA. As such rearranged
`DNA is the result of VK-to-JK recombination, the size of up-
`stream fragments is diverse among plasmacytomas and hy-
`bridomas of independent origin (24). The second type of K
`light chain rearrangement inspected is at the silent K allele.
`Typically this allele is either unrearranged (KO) or aberrantly
`rearranged (K-) (25). Since the K- rearrangement often re-
`sults from abortive VK rearrangements (23), these too are of
`diverse sizes in cell lines of independent origin. Hence, these
`types of rearrangements, when of identical size in cell lines,
`may have been inherited from a common ancestral lympho-
`cyte.
`Four hybridomas (H36-1, -4, -15, and -18) have indistin-
`guishable rearranged upstream DNA; of these, three (H36-1,
`-4, and -15) have indistinguishable K- rearrangements. H36-
`18 has a slightly smaller K- rearrangement; this may be a
`different K- form or a secondary deletion of the K- shared by
`H36-1, -4, and -15. The other H36 hybridomas (H36-5, -7,
`and -17) do not share these upstream DNA or K- rearrange-
`ments. Thus, by these criteria, we believe that at least H36-
`1, -4, -15, and -18 may be related; H36-5, -7, and -17 may be
`of independent origin(s), but their relatedness to each other
`is strongly suggested by shared amino acid substitutions. It
`is also possible that all seven examples are related through a
`common precursor but that mutations at restriction sites or
`rearrangements affecting upstream DNA or the silent K allele
`occurred during subsequent cell divisions.
`From this evidence of relatedness between at least two
`subsets of the H36 hybridomas, we favor the hypothesis that
`amino acid substitutions shared by the VK regions of a subset
`represent the sequential accumulation of somatic mutations.
`By this interpretation certain features of somatic mutation
`emerge:
`(0 Somatic mutation is an ongoing process occurring over
`many generations and during different stages of lymphocyte
`differentiation. Since the lineage comprising antibodies H36-
`1, -4, -15, and -18 (Fig. 4) includes examples with the same
`
`Genealogical relationship of H36 hybridoma VK21C light
`FIG. 4.
`chains. This tree shows the descent of the VK21C chains from the
`germ-line Va21C gene. The distances are proportional to the number
`of amino acid replacements from this germ-line sequence. Only the
`sequence to residue 33 (Fig. 1) has been used; hence, H36-5 and
`H36-7 are not separated. Further amino acid sequence analysis does
`separate this pair. This tree requires the fewest independent parallel
`replacements. In this case, valine-27b (VK21C°) to isoleucine (H36-4
`and -17) and methionine-33 (VK21C0) to isoleucine (H36-1 and -4) are
`assumed to have occurred independently. It is interesting to note
`that the former substitution has occurred twice and the latter has
`been observed once in V,,21 light chains from plasmacytomas. None
`of the other H36 substitutions have been seen in other VK21 variant
`chains. The set encircled are hybridomas thought to be related be-
`cause all four have an indistinguishable upstream element and three
`of these (H36-1, 4, and -15) have an indistinguishable K- rearrange-
`ment. H36-5, -7, and -17 may be of independent origin as indicated
`by the dashed lines.
`
`bodies binding to the antigenic site, Sb, on the HA (9). To
`examine how this diverse repertoire is generated, we have
`initiated a structural analysis of HA (Sb)-specific hybridoma
`antibodies that had been generated from a single donor
`mouse, H36. The seven H36 hybridomas were chosen on the
`basis of a previous serological analysis, which indicated that
`these antibodies used a K light chain of the VK21C subgroup
`and formed a closely related set whose individual members,
`however, could be differentiated from each other by para-
`typic and/or idiotypic analysis (9). The amino acid se-
`quences of these K chains confirms that all belong to the
`VK21C subgroup. Further, the size of the DNA endonuclease
`fragment bearing the productive VK gene shows that all ex-
`amples have rearranged the VK21C gene to the JK2 gene seg-
`ment. However, the VK sequences of the H36 K light chains
`differ from each other and from the gene product of the
`VK21C germ-line gene. Hence, we believe that the diversity
`within this set arises by somatic mutation.
`The extent and pattern of amino acid replacements is re-
`markable. The H36 VK21C regions that are nearly complete-
`ly sequenced have either seven or eight replacements com-
`pared to the VK21C germ-line sequence. This is more than
`the average number of substitutions (ca. 1) observed in a
`survey of X light chains or VK21 chains produced by mouse
`plasmacytomas (3, 21). The pattern of variability is also un-
`usual in that many of the amino acid substitutions are shared
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1034, p. 4
`
`

`

`3184
`
`Immunology: McKean et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad Sd USA 81 (1984)
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`
`9.
`
`heavy chain isotype (y2a) (Fig. 1), the mutational differences
`between these must have occurred after the switch from IgM
`to Ig2a expression. This lineage also includes examples with
`different isotypes (4yl or y2a, Fig. 1). As the switch from IgM
`to distinct isotypes appears to occur in a single step (ju to yl
`and A to y2a) (26), the mutations shared by these examples
`must have occurred prior to the isotype switch.
`(ii) The rate of somatic mutation seems to be high. If we
`assume that a precursor to these H36 mutants was selected
`during the primary immunization with PR8 because of the
`common glycine-to-aspartic acid substitution at position 29,
`then 6 to 7 replacements accumulated at the time of fusion
`(24 days after primary immunization). If these lymphocytes
`were dividing continuously with a generation time of 18 hr,
`the mutation rate would be in the range of 10-3 per base pair
`per generation. This estimate of a high mutation rate is con-
`sistent with the observations of Scharff and co-worker on
`the VH of the plasmacytoma S107 (8).
`(iii) The somatic mutations leading to amino acid replace-
`ments are clustered and are found mainly in complementar-
`ity-determining regions. In this respect the pattern of vari-
`ability is similar to that found in VA and VK21 plasmacytoma
`light chains, but the number of replacements is more exten-
`sive. To explain the pattern of variability in VA, it was pro-
`posed that antigen may act in the selection (selective expan-
`sion) of B cells expressing mutated immunoglobulin recep-
`tors that fit the antigen (3). The marked clustering of
`replacement mutations in complementarity-determining re-
`gions of the light chains of the H36 hybridoma antibody set
`agrees with this proposal and further suggests that antigen
`selection acts on sequentially arising single-point mutations
`throughout the development of a B-cell lineage. The few mu-
`tations in framework regions also may play a role in modify-
`ing antibody specificity or else may have been coselected
`along with complementarity-determining region replace-
`ments. The latter could occur if the rate of mutation of these
`genes is high.
`This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants
`GM-20964, CA-31638, CA-26297, AI-13989, and CA-06927 and by
`an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. D.M. is
`the recipient of a Research Career Development Award, CA00586,
`from the National Cancer Institute.
`Tonegawa, 5. (1983) Nature (London) 302, 575-581.
`1.
`Baltimore, D. (1981) Cell 26, 295-296.
`2.
`
`Weigert, M., Cesari, I. M., Yonkovich, S. J. & Cohn, M.
`(1970) Nature (London) 228, 1045-1047.
`Brenner, S. & Milstein, C. (1966) Nature (London) 211, 242-
`243.
`Gearhart, P. J., Johnson, N. D., Douglas, R. & Hood, L.
`(1981) Nature (London) 291, 29-34.
`Kim, S., Davis, M., Sinn, E., Patten, P. & Hood, L. (1981)
`Cell 27, 573-581.
`Baltimore, D. (1981) Cell 24, 592-594.
`Cook, W. D. & Scharff, M. D. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 74, 5687-5691.
`Staudt, L. M. & Gerhard, W. (1983) J. Exp. Med. 157, 687-
`704.
`Shulman, M., Wilde, C. D. & Kohler, G. (1978) Nature (Lon-
`don) 276, 269-270.
`Ey, P. L., Prowse, S. J. & Jenkins, C. R. (1978) Immuno-
`chemistry 15, 429-436.
`12. McKean, D. J., & Potter, M. (1979) in T and B Lymphocytes:
`Recognition and Function, ed. Bach, F. H. (Academic, New
`York), pp. 63-71.
`Huang, H. V., Bond, M. W., Hunkapiller, M. W. & Hood, L.
`(1983) Methods Enzymol. 91, 318-323.
`14. Van Ness, B. G., Weigert, M., Coleclough, C., Mather, E. L.,
`Kelley, D. E. & Perry, R. P. (1981) Cell 27, 593-602.
`Perry, R. P., Kelley, D. E., Schibler, U., Heubner, K. & Cro-
`ce, C. M. (1979) J. Cell. Physiol. 98, 553-560.
`Southern, E. M. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98, 503-517.
`Wahl, G. M., Stern, M. & Stark, G. R. (1979) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 76, 3683-3687.
`Huppi, K., Julius, M., Staudt, L., Gerhard, W. & Weigert, M.
`(1984) Ann. Immunol. (Paris) 135c, 181-185.
`Dayhoff, M. (1972) Atlas of Protein Sequences and Structure
`(National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC),
`Vol. 5.
`Heinrich, G., Traunecker, A. & Tonegawa, S. (1984) J. Exp.
`Med. 159, 417-435.
`Weigert, M., Gatmaitan, L., Loh, E., Schilling, J. & Hood, L.
`(1978) Nature (London) 276, 785-790.
`Julius, M. (1982) Dissertation (University of Pennsylvania,
`Philadelphia, PA).
`Seidman, J. G., Nau, M. M., Norman, B., Kwan, S.-P.,
`Scharff, M. & Leder, P. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77,
`6022-6026.
`24. Van Ness, B. G., Coleclough, C., Perry, R. P. & Weigert, M.
`(1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 262-266.
`Coleclough, C., Perry, R. P., Kardalainen, K. & Weigert, M.
`(1981) Nature (London) 290, 372-378.
`Marcu, K. D., Lang, R. B., Stanton, L. W. & Harris, L. R.
`(1982) Nature (London) 298, 87-89.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`13.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1034, p. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket