throbber
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Sara Carmen
`is a senior scientist and
`Lutz Jermutus
`is the head of the technology
`development team within the
`display technology group at
`CAT (Cambridge Antibody
`Technology). The team is
`dedicated to exploring
`innovative solutions in library
`design and selection strategies,
`as well as phage and ribosome
`display.
`
`Keywords: phage display,
`antibody, library, valency,
`selection
`
`Sara Carmen,
`Display Technology Development,
`Cambridge Antibody Technology,
`The Science Park,
`Melbourn,
`Cambridgeshire,
`SG8 6JJ, UK
`
`Tel: +44(0)1763 269 284
`Fax: +44 (0)1763 263 413
`E-mail: sara.carmen@
`cambridgeantibody.com
`
`Concepts in antibody
`phage display
`
`Sara Carmen and Lutz Jermutus
`Date received (in revised form): 15th April 2002
`
`Abstract
`This paper introduces the reader to antibody phage display and its use in combinatorial
`biochemistry. The focus is on overviewing phage display formats, library design and selection
`technology, which are the prerequisites for the successful isolation of specific antibody
`fragments against a diverse set of target antigens.
`
`Abbreviations
`CDR, complementarity determining region
`VH, variable heavy chain
`VL, variable light chain
`scFv, single chain variable fragment
`g3p, gene 3 protein
`
`N1, first N-terminal domain of g3p
`N2, second N-terminal domain of g3p
`CT, C-terminal domain of g3p
`IG, intergenic region
`RT, reverse transcription
`
`INTRODUCTION TO
`PHAGE DISPLAY
`Animal immunisation followed by
`hybridoma technology has been used to
`generate monoclonal antibodies against a
`variety of antigens. Over the past ten
`years, advances in molecular biology have
`allowed for the use of Escherichia coli to
`produce recombinant antibodies. By
`restricting the size to either a Fab, a Fv or
`a linker-stabilised single chain Fv (scFv)
`(Figure 1) such antibody fragments can
`not only be expressed in bacterial cells but
`also displayed by fusion to phage coat
`proteins.1
`The phage display concept was first
`introduced for short peptide fragments in
`1985.2 Fragments of the EcoRI
`endonuclease, displayed as a polypeptide
`fusion (phenotype) to the gene 3 protein
`(g3p), were encoded on the DNA
`molecule (genotype) encapsulated within
`the phage particle. The linkage of
`genotype to phenotype is the fundamental
`aspect of phage display. Subsequently,
`phage display of functional antibody
`fragments was shown3 when the VH and
`VL fragments of the anti-lysozyme
`antibody (D1.3) were introduced, with a
`linker, into a phage vector at the N-
`terminus of g3p. Since then, large scFv,
`
`Fab and peptide repertoires have been
`generated using a variety of phage display
`formats.
`One of the major advantages of phage
`display technology of antibody fragments
`compared with standard hybridoma
`technology is that the generation of
`specific scFv/Fab fragments to a particular
`antigen can be performed within a couple
`of weeks. The starting point is usually an
`antibody library, of either naive or
`immune origin, comprising a population
`of, ideally, 109 –1011 clones. After usually
`two to, maximally, three rounds of
`selection, the population is enriched for a
`high percentage of antibody fragments
`specific for the target antigen. The display
`of human antibody fragments is of
`particular interest since any therapeutic
`derived from these antibody fragments is
`believed to have a minimal risk of an
`immune response in patients.
`Both scFv and Fab formats have been
`used successfully in antibody libraries
`displayed on phage. Fab fragments are
`usually more stable than Fv fragments and
`have less potential to dimerise than scFvs.4
`In addition to the VH and VL segments,
`they also possess the constant regions (CH
`and CL) of the heavy and light chains.
`They are reputed to be displayed at lower
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`1 8 9
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 1
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`are coat proteins. The major coat protein
`is the gene 8 protein (g8p) which is
`present in almost 2,700 copies and
`responsible for encapsulating the phage
`DNA (Figure 2). The distal end of the
`phage particle is capped by five copies
`each of g7p and g9p. At the proximal end,
`four to five copies each of g6p and g3p
`are present. M13 bacteriophage infects
`only male bacteria, ie those E. coli cells
`that bear the F-plasmid which encodes
`the F-pilus. Infection is mediated by the
`interaction between g3p of the phage and
`the F-pilus. Filamentous phage have the
`characteristic that once they have infected
`their host cell they do not lyse the cell,
`but instead are able to replicate and are
`released from the cell membrane while
`the host cell continues to grow and
`divide, in contrast to the lytic phages T4
`and T7.
`The structure and function of g3p have
`been well studied. The protein is
`responsible for phage infection and for
`release of the phage particle following
`assembly.14,15 It has two N-terminal
`domains (N1 and N2) and a C-terminal
`domain (CT, Figure 3). N1, which has
`been shown to be essential for
`infectivity,16 interacts with the TolA
`protein of the TolQRA complex located
`across the periplasmic space between the
`inner and outer E. coli membranes. The
`primary interaction of phage with an
`E. coli cell is mediated by N2 binding the
`F-pilus and it is this association that is
`thought to bring N1 into close proximity
`with TolA. It is not yet understood how
`TolA contributes to phage infection;
`however, it is known that the F-pilus
`retracts and that the M13 genome is
`injected into the cytoplasm. CT is
`required for the termination of phage
`assembly in the periplasm and release of
`the phage from the cell membrane. Once
`the cells have been infected and phage
`protein production commences, the cells
`are no longer able to be infected. The
`presence of only very small amounts of
`the g3p of f1 filamentous phage has been
`shown to be associated with a resistance of
`the cell to infection from filamentous
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Figure 1: Antibody structure and derived
`fragments. (A) IgG, 160 kilodaltons (kD); (B)
`Fab fragment, 50 kD; (C) Fv fragment, 30 kD;
`(D) scFv with linker, 30 kDa
`
`frequency on the surface of phage, thus
`alleviating the avidity effects associated
`with some well-expressed scFvs.
`Synthetic and naive Fab libraries have
`been used successfully for the generation
`of antibody fragments to a variety of
`antigens.5–8 Expression of the scFv
`fragment has a less toxic effect on the cell
`than the larger Fab molecules.4 This
`results in a better yield and diversity in
`scFv libraries. The remainder of this paper
`will, therefore, focus primarily on scFv
`libraries since they are generally the more
`popular choice.9
`Expression in E. coli ensures that
`sufficient quantities of scFv, for screening
`and characterisation, can be produced
`with relative ease. Many secreted
`eukaryotic proteins such as antibodies
`require disulphide bonds for stability, and
`the oxidising environment of the E. coli
`periplasm, where filamentous phage
`assembles, provides the appropriate
`conditions for antibody folding. Human
`antibodies against human proteins can be
`isolated from diverse human antibody
`libraries. Moreover, antibodies to toxic
`molecules such as doxorubicin10 can be
`obtained, a task difficult with
`immunisation/hybridoma techniques.
`
`M13 phage biology
`M13 is a filamentous bacteriophage. The
`native particle is a thin, cylindrical shape,
`usually 900 nm long and 6–7 nm in
`diameter.11,12 It contains a single-stranded
`DNA genome (6,407 base pairs in length)
`which encodes 11 genes,13 five of which
`
`Carmen and Jermutus
`
`The oxidising periplasm
`of E. coli favours
`disulphide bond
`formation
`
`Filamentous phage
`assemblies in the E. Coli
`periplasm
`
`1 9 0
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 2
`
`

`

`Concepts in antibody phage display
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`X
`
`II
`
`V
`
`IG
`
`ori
`
`6.4 kb
`
`IV
`
`VII
`
`IX
`
`VIII
`
`IG
`
`III
`
`I
`
`VI
`
`XI
`
`Figure 2: The structure of M13 phage particle. The phage particle is of cylindrical shape (900 nm long) and only 6–7 nm in
`diameter. Non-structural proteins are unshaded. All coat proteins are shaded according to their corresponding gene in the
`genome. The intergenic regions are marked by IG. G8p is the major coat protein and is present in about 2,700 copies. The
`minor coat proteins g3p, g6p, g7p and g9p are present in approximately five copies each
`
`phage. Its presence in the E. coli
`membrane disrupts the membrane
`integrity, causing a number of effects
`including defective F-pili.17
`The five coat proteins have all been
`
`All coat proteins can be
`used for phage display
`
`Figure 3: The modular structure of g3p. The N1 domain interacts with
`the TolA protein in the E. coli membrane. The N2 domain binds the F-
`pilus and the CT is necessary for termination of phage assembly. The
`glycine-rich linkers, G1 and G2, are thought to confer flexibility to the
`domains, facilitating the infection process. Antibody fragments can be
`displayed at the N-terminus of g3p. Alternatively, they can be displayed as
`an N-terminal fusion to CT
`
`used as fusion proteins for phage
`display.18,19 Genomic or cDNA libraries
`are favoured as C-terminal fusions to g8p
`since expression constraints due to
`frameshifts and stop codons are avoided.20
`C-terminal polypeptide fusions to g3p
`have also been demonstrated.21 Since g3p
`is the most popular fusion protein, this
`paper will concentrate on display of
`antibody fragments on g3p in a phagemid
`system.
`
`PHAGE DISPLAY FORMATS
`Early phage display formats involved the
`fusion of peptides to the N-terminus of
`g3p or g8p in the M13 phage vector. The
`polypeptide or antibody fragment was
`displayed in a multivalent format, since all
`copies of the coat protein are translated as
`fusion proteins,22,23 although it was not
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`1 9 1
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 3
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Carmen and Jermutus
`
`Phagemid vectors
`facilitate construction of
`large libraries
`
`possible to display larger polypeptides or
`proteins without affecting the function of
`g8p. Six residue insertions are usually
`tolerated, but, when the insert is increased
`to eight residues, only 40 per cent of
`phage are infectious and, at 16 residues,
`this number drops to less than one per
`cent.24 Larger fusion proteins to g3p are
`tolerated, but, in a multivalent display
`format, such fusions may cause a decrease
`in infectivity2 by sterically hindering the
`interaction of N2 and the F-pilus. These
`problems are overcome by the use of
`phagemids.
`Phagemids are plasmids
`(4.6 kilobases) which encode a signal
`sequence, the phage coat protein and an
`antibiotic resistance marker. The antibody
`fragment/polypeptide is cloned upstream
`of the g3p/g8p coat protein sequence and
`expression is controlled by the use of a
`promoter such as lacZ. The relatively
`small size of these vectors means that they
`have higher transformation efficiencies
`than phage vectors,25 hence facilitating
`the construction of large repertoires or
`libraries of peptide or antibody fragments.
`The incorporation of an amber stop
`codon between the displayed protein and
`the phage coat protein permits fusion
`protein expression in suppressor strains of
`
`E. coli such as TG1.26 Non-suppressor
`strains, such as HB2151,27 will not
`incorporate a glutamine at the amber
`codon, thereby resulting in production of
`only the antibody/polypeptide moiety.
`A phagemid cannot produce infective
`phage particles alone. A helper phage such
`as M13KO7 or VCSM13 is required. The
`helper phage provides the genes which
`are essential for phage replication and
`assembly, including a wild-type copy of
`the coat protein used for display. Cells
`already containing the phagemid vector
`are superinfected with the helper phage.
`Glucose in the growth media represses the
`lacZ promoter, preventing expression of
`g3p-fusion, which would inhibit
`superinfection. Once the helper phage
`genome is incorporated into the cell, the
`glucose is removed and phage production
`commences. The M13KO7 genome
`possesses a modified intergenic region
`(IG),28 causing it to be replicated and
`packaged less efficiently than the
`phagemid which carries the wild-type
`M13 IG. This ensures that the genotype
`(phagemid) and phenotype (g3p–scFv
`fusion) are linked in a single (phage)
`molecule, which is the key feature of
`phage display (Figure 4). The antibody
`fragment can also be fused to a truncated
`
`Figure 4: Sequence of events depicting phage infection, assembly and secretion using a phagemid system. (1) Phage
`displaying scFv infects cell. Single-stranded phagemid DNA is injected into cytoplasm. (2) Helper phage superinfect
`providing genomic information encoding remaining phage proteins for phage replication and assembly. (3) ScFv–g3p fusion,
`from the phagemid vector, and all other structural proteins (including wild-type g3p) from the helper phage vector, are
`directed to the periplasm. (4) Phage assembly occurs in the E. coli periplasm. Phage containing DNA encoding scFv
`sequence (genotype) and displaying scFv (phenotype) are secreted from cell membrane
`
`1 9 2
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 4
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Concepts in antibody phage display
`
`CT domain in a phagemid system since
`there will always be copies of wild-type
`g3p from the helper phage for infection.
`Selectively infective phage (SIP)
`technology (reviewed in Jung et al.29)
`exploits the modular nature of g3p and
`can be used for identifying protein–ligand
`interactions. The ligand is coupled to
`N1–N2 either by the use of an expression
`vector or, if it is sufficiently small (eg an
`organic molecule), it can be chemically
`coupled. The receptor/scFv is fused to
`the CT domain of g3p as part of the
`phage particle. It is the interaction
`between the ligand and the receptor
`which restores the domains of g3p,
`thereby rendering the phage infectious
`(Figure 5). The main difference between
`this technology and standard phage
`display is that the selection and infection
`
`process are coupled. Since interaction
`leads to infection, there is no need for
`elution.
`A variation of this technology —
`termed Cys display — has recently been
`presented.30 Here, the g3p and the
`antibody fragment to be displayed are
`both expressed separately in the cell,
`although both with a terminal Cys. In the
`oxidising periplasm, g3p and scFv can
`interact, allowing for the formation of a
`g3p–S–S–scFv fusion which can later be
`eluted by reducing agents such as DTT.
`No selection results have so far been
`reported with this technology, but there is
`the possibility of unpaired cysteine
`residues interfering with disulphide bond
`formation in the scFv, resulting in
`misfolding and reduced yields.31
`Competition from g3p of the helper
`
`Figure 5: Formats for scFv display and vectors used. (A) Wild-type phage displaying multiple scFvs at the N-terminus of
`the N1 domain. (B) and (C) scFv displayed at the N-terminus of N1 or CT, respectively. Both these formats incorporate
`copies of wild-type g3p. (D) SIP technology. scFv is displayed at the end of CT domain of wild-type g3p in the phage vector.
`Infectivity is dependent on the scFv interacting with a ligand attached to the N-terminal domains. (E) Hyperphage. The
`helper phage genome lacks a g3p so all copies of g3p are derived from the phagemid vector system, resulting in multivalent
`phage
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`1 9 3
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 5
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Carmen and Jermutus
`
`Most phage do not
`display a fusion protein
`
`Library sizes have
`continued to increase
`
`Naı¨ve libraries contain
`natural CDRs
`
`Synthetic libraries
`contain artificial CDRs
`
`phage and proteolytic degradation of the
`g3p-fusion usually result in phage
`populations where as little as ten per cent
`of phage display a fusion protein.32 This is
`an important consideration when trying
`to represent large repertoires of antibody
`fragments, since at least ten times more
`phage are required to reach the theoretical
`diversity. Use of a gene 3-less helper
`phage helps to restore fusion protein
`display levels.33 Hyperphage is a modified
`helper phage which displays the g3p
`phenotype but which contains a phage
`vector that lacks the gene 3 sequence.34
`Production of such hyperphage particles
`necessitates exogenous g3p by culturing
`in the E. coli strain DH5Æ/pIII. These
`cells possess a lacZ-regulated gene 3
`sequence on their chromosome. The
`resulting infective hyperphage particles
`are superinfected into cells containing a
`phagemid, and, during phage production,
`the only g3p produced is the scFv-fusion
`from the phagemid vector. This results in
`multivalent display, a phenomenon also
`resulting from the use of phage vectors.
`The potential advantage of this system is
`the improved chance of finding a clone of
`interest from large populations, due to a
`lower background from phage displaying
`only the helper phage g3p. Alternatively,
`the g3p could be supplied from cells
`containing a plasmid encoding the gene 3
`sequence regulated by the phage shock
`promoter (psp).35 This operon is induced
`following infection by filamentous phage,
`resulting in production of g3p which can
`complement a helper phage with a
`deleted gene 3 sequence.
`
`CONSTRUCTION OF
`PHAGE ANTIBODY
`LIBRARIES
`Naive antibody libraries
`The genomic information coding for
`antibody variable domains is usually
`derived from B cells of either ‘naı¨ve’
`(non–immunised) or immunised
`donors.36 An antibody repertoire from
`immunisation is generally restricted to
`generating antibodies against the antigen
`of the original immunogenic response,
`
`whereas naı¨ve libraries have the advantage
`that they can theoretically be used for an
`unlimited range of antigens. Construction
`of these libraries involves relatively
`straightforward molecular biology
`techniques such as RT of mRNA,
`followed by polymerase chain reaction
`(PCR) with germline-specific primers to
`amplify the VH and VL gene segments
`from the cDNA template, and restriction-
`based cloning to incorporate the
`rearranged antibody segments into an
`appropriate phagemid display vector.
`Finally, the vectors are transformed into
`E. coli cells to generate the antibody
`repertoire. The first naı¨ve scFv phagemid
`library was constructed using peripheral
`blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and was
`predicted to have a diversity of .107.
`Antibody fragments isolated from this
`library demonstrated micromolar
`affinities.37 About five years later, a scFv
`library of .1010 recombinants, derived
`from tonsil and PBLs, was described.10
`This library allowed for the selection of
`scFvs with affinities in the subnanomolar
`range. These results support theoretical
`predictions38 that the size of the library is
`thought to be proportional to the
`affinities of the isolated antibodies. The
`limiting factor for generating large library
`sizes is the transformation step; even if this
`is optimised, library sizes in the range of
`108 –1011 can be accomplished only after
`numerous electroporations. Recently,
`protocol improvements, primarily relating
`to DNA purification and choice of strain,
`have been described that allow the
`generation of library sizes of 1010 in a
`single electroporation step.39
`
`Synthetic antibody libraries
`Construction of synthetic libraries
`involves rearranging VH and VL gene
`segments in vitro and introducing artificial
`complementarity determining region
`(CDRs) of varying loop lengths using
`PCR and randomised oligonucleotide
`primers. One of the earliest synthetic
`repertoires used a diverse repertoire of
`human VH gene segments paired with a
`constant Vº3 (DPL16) light chain
`
`1 9 4
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 6
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`sequence. A randomised VH CDR3
`ranging from four to 12 residues was
`introduced40 which resembles the natural
`loop length diversity more closely than an
`earlier synthetic repertoire which had
`loop lengths of either five or eight
`residues.41 A library of .108
`recombinants was generated from which
`antibodies to a variety of human antigens,
`as well as a diverse collection of non-
`human proteins, were isolated.
`Most antibody fragments usually
`require an oxidising environment for
`folding, although it is possible to isolate
`antibodies that are able to fold into a
`functional and stable antibody domain
`structure in a reducing environment.
`These antibodies are relatively rare and
`might be restricted to certain germlines.
`They may possess an above average
`thermodynamic stability and should be
`particularly useful for intracellular
`applications. A previously isolated scFv
`(F8), shown to be functionally expressed
`in both bacterial and plant cytoplasm, was
`used as a scaffold framework.42 Specific
`residues in the CDR3s of the heavy and
`light chain were randomised and a library
`(diversity of 5 3 107) was generated.
`Antibodies of submicromolar affinity,
`which can be functionally expressed in
`the cytoplasm, have been successfully
`isolated to a variety of targets, such as
`proteins from plant viruses, as well as
`more common protein targets such as
`lysozyme.
`Some of the more recently constructed
`synthetic repertoires have opted to restrict
`the number of frameworks used. The
`HuCAL library43 is a fully synthetic
`antibody library which has yielded
`antibodies with nanomolar (nM) affinities
`to a number of antigens. The framework
`diversity is limited to seven heavy and
`seven light chain consensus sequences.
`Based on sequence analysis of human
`variable antibody domain genes, the
`authors determined that the majority of
`canonical structures are represented by
`these consensus sequences. For each
`antibody germline family, scFv sequences
`were optimised for expression by
`
`Concepts in antibody phage display
`
`avoiding rare codons in E. coli. All six
`CDRs are flanked by restriction sites to
`facilitate affinity maturation.
`
`In vivo recombined antibody
`libraries
`To get around the earlier limits imposed
`by the transformation step, some libraries
`have been constructed using in vivo
`recombination or combinatorial infection
`to generate highly diverse repertoires of
`either synthetic or naive antibody
`fragments. A synthetic Fab library was
`constructed using two vectors,5 each with
`a different antibiotic selectable marker.
`One was a plasmid derived from pUC19
`and the second was a phage vector
`(fdDOG), and the heavy and light chain
`antibody sequences were cloned into
`these vectors, respectively. The vectors
`were then incorporated into the same cell
`by a simple phage rescue strategy and cells
`were subsequently co-infected by the
`chloramphenicol-resistant bacteriophage
`P1. P1 provides the Cre recombinase
`which recognises the loxP sites flanking
`the heavy and light chain antibody
`sequences and recombines them within
`the cell. The library was predicted to
`contain 6.4 3 1010 recombinants, the
`recombinants being detected on the basis
`of their resistance to all three antibiotics.
`Recently, a single vector system also
`using Cre recombinase has been
`described.44 A phagemid vector
`containing both VH and VL segments was
`transfected into cells and the phage
`population produced from this primary
`library was then allowed to infect bacteria
`at a high multiplicity of infection (ratio of
`phage to cells), so ensuring that more than
`one vector is incorporated per cell. The
`VH and VL segments were then exchanged
`between vectors generating multiple new
`VH/VL combinations. Using this method,
`a naive scFv library with a diversity of
`3 3 1011 was created. This library is
`potentially more stable than those
`previously constructed using in vivo
`recombination because of the use of the
`smaller phagemid vector.
`
`Antibodies that form
`functional proteins in a
`reducing environment
`are rare
`
`Large library sizes can
`alternatively be created
`in vivo recombination
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`1 9 5
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 7
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Quality control of antibody
`libraries
`As larger libraries are possible with
`improved technology, the task of assessing
`diversity remains difficult. BstNI
`fingerprinting is a quick way of checking
`for diversity since the scFv sequence can
`be amplified directly from colonies by
`PCR. The product is then digested using
`the BstNI enzyme and different sequences
`will give different band patterns on an
`agarose gel. Sequencing is a preferable
`method since it also provides information
`on clones that have frameshifts or stop
`codons and demonstrates additional
`diversity which may not be obtained from
`a BstNI restriction digest; however, the
`sample size required to assess library sizes
`above 109 is well beyond most laboratory
`sequencing capabilities. Furthermore,
`information attained by sequence
`diversity may not equate to the functional
`diversity of the library. A clone can
`contain a complete and in-frame VH –VL
`sequence, but it may not produce
`functional protein because the antibody
`fragment may be aggregated, misfolded or
`toxic to the cell. Aggregated antibody
`may result in ‘bald’ phage — ie phage that
`display only g3p from the helper phage
`vector. As the vast majority of phage are
`either monovalent or ‘bald’, large
`populations of phage, much greater than
`the library size, are required for efficient
`representation of the library diversity. The
`best measure to assess library quality is
`how well the library performs in
`selections. Populations of medium to high
`affinity (nM range) antibodies should be
`isolated directly from a quality library for
`a highly diverse panel of antigens.
`Ways to improve display levels, other
`than those mentioned earlier, may include
`co-expression of scFv fragments with the
`E. coli Skp and/or FkpA periplasmic
`proteins. These chaperones have been
`shown to improve both soluble and
`displayed scFv levels.45–47 Alternatively,
`clones that display g3p from the helper
`phage, due to absence of
`g3-fusion protein, can be effectively
`removed using a modified helper phage.
`
`A protease cleavage site introduced into
`the gene 3 sequence of the helper phage
`genome between N2 and CT resulted in
`the KM13 helper phage,48 which was
`then used to rescue a phagemid library.
`Clones that expressed misfolded scFvs
`and, as a consequence, packaged only
`helper phage g3p, were rendered non-
`infectious by incubation with trypsin.
`Trypsin can also be used effectively as an
`elution reagent49,50 which also removes
`‘bald’ clones via their protease cleavage
`site. It can also be used sequentially
`following, for example, competitive
`elution with the original antigen.51 Using
`this method, a dramatic reduction in
`background from non-specific phage was
`observed compared with standard elution
`methods. This can probably be explained
`by effective removal of all frameshifted, or
`poorly expressing, clones from the
`population, when previously they had
`been seen to have a growth advantage.52,53
`
`SELECTION
`TECHNOLOGIES
`While a lot of work has concentrated on
`the generation of larger and more rational
`or designed libraries, other researchers
`have concentrated their efforts on the
`selection process itself. The selection
`protocol can be divided up into five main
`steps: (i) coating of antigen; (ii) block; (iii)
`incubation of phage with antigen; (iv)
`washing to remove non-specific phage;
`and (v) elution (Figure 6A–D).
`Surfaces can be coated with antigen in
`a variety of ways, the most common
`being direct adsorption to a plastic surface
`where it is non-covalently associated via
`electrostatic and Van-der-Waals
`interactions. If it is a short peptide or a
`small organic molecule, it is more
`commonly conjugated to a carrier protein
`such as BSA (bovine serum albumin) or
`KLH (keyhole limpet haemocyanin)
`before immobilisation onto the plastic
`surface, as it will not remain bound on its
`own or, if bound, will be sterically
`difficult to access by the phage library.
`Antigen can be biotinylated for selections
`in solution. The phage–antibody–antigen
`
`Carmen and Jermutus
`
`Library quality can be
`assessed by its
`performance in
`selections
`
`Co-expression of
`chaperones can
`improve display levels
`
`Small molecules are
`first conjugated to a
`carrier molecule
`
`1 9 6
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 8
`
`

`

`Concepts in antibody phage display
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`Figure 6: The phage display/selection cycle. (A) Antigen is immobilised onto plastic. (B) Library/outputs are incubated
`with the antigen surface. (C) Unbound phage are removed and the surface is washed. (D) Phage are eluted. (E) E. coli cells
`are infected with eluted phage. (F) Cells are plated onto selective agar plates. (G) Selection output is amplified. (H) Helper
`phage superinfect cells containing phagemid vector. (I) Phage replication and assembly provides population of enriched
`phage for next round of selection
`
`Pure antigen in native
`conformation improves
`phage output specificity
`
`Reversibly bound
`antigen may reduce the
`number of specific
`antibody hits
`
`complexes are subsequently captured
`using streptavidin-coated paramagnetic
`beads. Selections on cell surfaces have also
`been successfully demonstrated,54–59 as
`well as on protein bands from
`nitrocellulose membranes following two-
`dimensional (2D) electrophoresis.50,60,61
`Antigen purity is important since
`contaminants presented to a naı¨ve
`antibody library are very likely to generate
`antibodies to proteins other than the
`target antigen. The proportion of protein
`that is immobilised while retaining its
`native structure and how often each
`epitope is presented and accessible are
`further considerations. While antigen is
`usually coated onto solid phase by passive
`adsorption, this process may cause
`denaturation of the molecules.62,63 This,
`
`in turn, can sometimes favour non-
`specific phage or antibody binding,64
`since the denatured form will present
`exposed hydrophobic residues, causing a
`‘sticky’ surface. Factors such as the
`chemistry of antigen immobilisation, the
`blocking agent used and the density of
`immobilised antigen can influence how
`well the antibody fragments can access a
`given epitope (Figure 7).64
`The main purpose of the blocking
`agent is to coat any exposed areas of the
`solid surface that are not already coated
`with an antigen molecule. During the
`blocking phase, antigen that is reversibly
`bound may well desorp.64 It is essential to
`rinse thoroughly after blocking since
`residual blocking agent containing
`desorped antigen may compete for
`
`& HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1473-9550. B R I E F I N G S I N F U N C T I O N A L G E N O M I C S A N D P R O T E O M I C S . VOL 1. NO 2. 189–203. JULY 2002
`
`1 9 7
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1032, p. 9
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bfg/article-abstract/1/2/189/207941 by guest on 20 July 2019
`
`specific antibody fragments after addition
`of the library. Zhuang et al.64 recommend
`the use of streptavidin-coated beads and a
`biotinylated antigen since, unlike passive
`absorption, this process does not favour
`denaturation of the antigen and, perhaps
`more importantly, immobilisation/
`coating is nearly covalent due to the tight
`interaction of biotin and streptavidin.
`Incubation with the library can be
`performed at various temperatures
`ranging from 48C to 378C. Some
`protocols shake/agitate the selection
`tubes/plates to improve the chances of
`specific phage encountering antigen.
`Phage displaying scFv that are not able to
`bind the antigen will either remain in
`solution or may bind non-specifically.
`The washing step is thought to be crucial
`for the removal of non-specific phage.
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket