throbber
Journal of Immunological Methods 241 (2000) 43–59
`
`www.elsevier.nl/locate/jim
`
`Monoclonal antibodies against the human interleukin-11
`receptor alpha-chain (IL-11Ra) and their use in studies of
`human mononuclear cells
`
`a
`b
`c
`b
`Chrystel Blanc , Patricia Vusio , Karin Schleinkofer , Olivier Boisteau ,
`c
`b
`c
`c



`Stefan Pflanz , Stephane Minvielle , Joachim Grotzinger , Gerhard Muller-Newen ,
`a ,*
`c
`b

`Peter C. Heinrich , Yannick Jacques , Felix A. Montero-Julian
`aImmunotech: A Beckman–Coulter Company,130 av. de Lattre de Tassigny, BP 177,13276 Marseille Cedex 9, France
`bINSERM U463, Institut de Biologie,9 Quai Moncousu,44035 Nantes Cedex 01, France
`c

`Institut f ur Biochemie RWTH Aachen, Klinikum Pauwelstr.30,52057, Aachen, Germany
`
`Received 23 December 1999; received in revised form 15 March 2000; accepted 4 April 2000
`
`Abstract
`
`A panel of 14 hybridoma cell lines secreting monoclonal antibodies against the human interleukin-11 receptor alpha chain
`(hIL-11Ra) was obtained using two different approaches. Two antibodies were raised against peptides of the N- and
`C-terminal sequences, respectively, of the extracellular part of the hIL-11Ra. Another group of 12 antibodies was generated
`against a hybrid protein consisting of the extracellular part of the hIL-11Ra fused to mature full-length human IL-2. All
`these antibodies recognized native hIL-11Ra and most also recognized the denatured receptor on immunoblots after
`SDS–PAGE. Four different epitopes were identified on the extracellular part of the hIL-11Ra. One epitope, defined by the
`E27 antibody, is located at the N-terminus and the other three epitopes are clustered in the membrane-proximal, C-terminal
`region. The antibodies defining epitopes I and II recognized membrane-bound hIL-11Ra expressed in gp130/hIL-11Ra-co-
`transfected Ba/ F3 cells. The E27 antibody cross-reacted with murine IL-11Ra,
`in agreement with the fact
`that
`the
`N-terminal region is highly conserved between species. The other 13 antibodies all recognized a region between amino acids
`319 and 363, which is the membrane-proximal part of the hIL-11Ra. This region, which is less conserved between mouse
`and human, is shown here to be an immunodominant region. Anti-IL-11Ra monoclonal antibodies, which have not been
`described previously enabled us to explore the expression and tissue distribution of IL-11Ra on human peripheral blood
`mononuclear cells and cell lines. The antibodies provide powerful tools for the study of the regulation and function of the
`receptor.
`2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Interleukin-11, Interleukin-11 receptor; Cytokine receptors; Monoclonal antibody
`
`interleukin-11
`interleukin; IL-11Ra,
`Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IL,
`receptor alpha chain; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SDS–PAGE, sodium dodecyl polyacrylamide gel
`electrophoresis
`*Corresponding author: Tel.: 133-4-9117-2752; fax: 133-4-9117-2753.
`E-mail address: montero@immunotech.fr (F.A. Montero-Julian)
`
`0022-1759/00/$ – see front matter
`PII: S0022-1759( 00 )00194-0
`
`2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 1
`
`(cid:211)
`(cid:211)
`

`

`44
`
`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Interleukin-11 (IL-11) was first described as a
`hematopoietic cytokine produced by bone marrow
`stromal cells (Paul et al., 1990). A variety of cells
`produce IL-11. It is involved in the development and
`proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells,
`as well as at different stages of hematopoiesis, such
`as the enhancement of megakaryocytopoiesis and
`platelet formation (Neben and Turner, 1993; Du and
`Williams, 1997). Its role in platelet formation recent-
`ly led to its therapeutic use in the prevention of
`thrombocytopenia
`associated with chemotherapy
`(Tepler et al., 1996). IL-11 exerts pleiotropic ac-
`tivities in different tissues, including the induction of
`acute phase proteins (Baumann and Schendel, 1991),
`the stimulation of the differentiation of B lympho-
`cytes into immunoglobulin-secreting cells (Anderson
`et al., 1992), the development of osteoclastic cells
`(Girasole et al., 1994), a role in neuronal develop-
`ment (Mehler et al., 1993), and the induction of
`protective effects in the intestinal mucosa (Booth and
`Potten, 1995). Recently, IL-11 was implicated in
`female reproduction (Robb et al., 1998) and was
`shown to have potent anti-inflammatory properties
`(Trepicchio et al., 1996; Hill et al., 1998).
`IL-11 has been grouped into the interleukin-6
`(IL-6) family (for reviews, see, Kishimoto et al.,
`1995; Heinrich et al., 1998). This family is com-
`posed of IL-6,
`leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF),
`oncostatin M (OSM), ciliary neurotrophic factor
`(CNTF) and cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1). All members of
`this
`cytokine
`family share
`the
`transmembrane
`glycoprotein gp130 as a common signal transducing
`subunit. An IL-11 receptor alpha-chain (IL-11Ra)
`binds IL-11 with low affinity (K |10 nmol/l) and is
`d
`responsible for ligand-binding specificity (Hilton et
`al., 1994). The IL-11 /IL-11Ra complex triggers the
`association of two gp130 molecules (Yin et al.,
`1993), leading to the formation of a high-affinity
`receptor (K |400–800 pmol/l) (Hilton et al., 1994)
`d
`able to transduce signals via the Janus kinase (Jak) /
`signal
`transducer and activator of
`transcription
`(STAT) signaling pathway (Dahmen et al., 1998).
`The IL-11Ra gene has been cloned in the mouse

`(Hilton et al., 1994) and human (Cherel et al., 1995;
`Nandurkar et al., 1996). The mouse genome contains
`two distinct IL-11Ra loci (Bilinski et al., 1996); one
`
`of these genes is expressed strongly in the testis and
`is restricted to some mouse strains. In the human,

`only one locus has been identified (Cherel et al.,
`1996; Van Leuven et al., 1996), but two different
`cDNAs were isolated, both coding for a membrane-
`anchored receptor with one lacking the cytoplasmic

`portion (Cherel et al., 1995, 1996). The two isoforms
`are both active (Lebeau et al., 1997). The sequence
`homology between murine and human IL-11Ra is
`84% at the amino acid level. At present, there is little
`information about
`the expression of IL-11Ra re-
`ceptor protein, and the existence of a soluble form of
`the receptor remains to be demonstrated. A func-
`tional role for IL-11 and for its a-receptor moiety
`and possible involvement in human disease has not
`been established. In order to address these questions,
`highly specific reagents directed at the IL-11Ra have
`to be developed, and we report here the generation
`and characterization of a panel of monoclonal anti-
`bodies against human IL-11Ra. We took advantage
`of these antibodies to analyze IL-11Ra receptor
`surface expression on peripheral blood mononuclear
`cell subsets and numerous human cell lines.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Reagents and antibodies
`
`Fine chemicals, unless otherwise stated, were from
`Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and cell culture re-
`agents from Biowhittaker (Gagny, France). Human
`recombinant
`IL-2 and IL-11, biotinylated rabbit
`polyclonal anti-IL-11 and recombinant murine IL-
`11RaFc chimera were from R&D Systems (Abin-
`gdon, UK). Restriction enzymes were purchased
`from Eurogentec (Brussels, Belgium). HAT reagent
`was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Rabbit
`polyclonal anti-murine IL-11R (N20) was purchased
`from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (California, USA).
`This antibody was generated using a peptide coding
`for the first 20 amino acids of the extracellular
`domain of the murine IL-11Ra and displayed 95%
`homology with the corresponding hIL-11Ra peptide.
`Peroxidase-, biotin- or phycoerythrin-conjugated
`goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit antibodies, as
`well as streptavidin conjugated to phycoerythrin or
`peroxidase, were obtained from Immunotech (Marse-
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 2
`
`

`

`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`45
`
`ille, France). Anti-human Fc-domain antibody was
`from Jackson Laboratories (New Jersey, USA).
`
`lines were maintained in RPMI-1640 containing 10%
`(v/v) FCS supplemented with additives.
`
`2.2. Cells and cell culture
`
`The IL-3-dependent mouse pro-B-cell line Ba/ F3
`and the stable transfectant Ba/F3/130/ IL-11Ra
`expressing both the human signal
`transduction
`subunit gp130 and the human IL-11 receptor a were
`generated as described (Lebeau et al., 1997). Ba/ F3
`cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 containing 10%
`(v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), sup-
`plemented with additives (2 mM glutamine, 1 mM
`sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids,
`500 U/ml penicillin/ streptomycin) and 2% (v/ v)
`WEHI-3-conditioned medium as a source of murine
`IL-3. Transfected cells were cultured in the same
`medium supplemented with 1 ng/ml of human
`recombinant IL-11 instead of IL-3. Mouse myeloma
`cell line X63.Ag.653 was maintained in Dulbecco’s
`modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented
`with 10% FCS and additives. The hybridoma cell
`lines were grown in DMEM supplemented with 20%
`FCS, additives and HAT (hypoxanthine–amino-
`pterin–thymidine). Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
`cells deficient in dehydroxyfolate reductase (DHFR
`2/ 2) were grown in DMEM/F12 medium with
`10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 500 U/ml penicillin /
`streptomycin. Transfected CHO cells were grown in
`RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, additives
`and 750 mg/ml of G418. Meg01 and MO7E
`megakaryoblastic leukemia, HEL and TF1 erythro-
`leukemia, KG1a bone marrow acute myelogenous
`leukemia, K562 chronic myelogenous
`leukemia,
`HL60 promyelocytic leukemia, THP-1 monocytic
`leukemia, NK3.3 NK cells, RPMI8866 B-cell lym-
`phoma, Daudi Burkitt lymphoma, Peer and Molt13
`leukemic T-cell
`lymphoma, MG63 and Saos2 os-
`teosarcoma, SW620 colon adenocarcinoma, INT407
`embryonic intestine, A375 melanoma, MDA-MD-
`157 and MCF-7 breast carcinoma, JAR choriocar-
`cinoma, SVK14 transformed keratinocyte, HELA
`epithelial carcinoma, SRJH30 rhabdomyosarcoma,
`SK-N-SH, SK-N-MC and IMR32 neuroblastoma,
`SNB-19, A172 and U373MG glioblastoma cell lines
`were obtained from the ATCC (Rockville, MD). The
`WM35 Melanoma cell line was provided by Dr M.
`Herlyn (Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA). All cell
`
`2.3. Preparation of soluble IL-11R–IL-2 fusion
`protein, transfection of CHO cells and purification
`of sIL-11R–IL-2
`
`A cDNA encoding a soluble form of the human
`IL-11Ra (amino acids 1–363) was generated by
`polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification from

`the complete cDNA of human IL-11Ra (Cherel et
`al., 1995) as template, with 59-GGAATTCGAAAT-
`GAGCAGCAGCTGCTCAG-39 as sense primer and
`59-TGCATGCATCACAGAGTCCCTGTGATCA-39
`as anti-sense primer. The fragment was cloned into a
`Bluescript plasmid coding for human Interleukin-2
`(hIL-2) opened with EcoRI/PstI. The resulting fused
`sIL-11R–IL-2 gene contains two additional codons
`as linker between the sIL-11Ra and IL-2 genes,
`coding for the dipeptide Met–Gly. The sequence of
`the hybrid sIL-11R–IL-2 gene was confirmed by
`sequencing. The sIL-11R–IL-2 was sub-cloned into
`the mammalian expression vector pKCR6 between
`the XhoI/NotI sites. The Bluescript plasmid con-
`taining hIL-2 and the vector pKCR6 were provided
`by Dr M. Bonneville (INSERM, Nantes).
`DHFR 2/ 2 CHO cells were co-transfected with
`both the pKCR6 sIL-11R–IL-2 plasmid and with the
`pCDNA3 plasmid (Invitrogen, Netherlands) which
`carries the neomycin resistance gene, thus providing
`an additional means of selection. The transfection
`was performed using LipofectAMINE PLUS Re-
`agent (Life Technologies) according to the manufac-
`turer’s protocol. Clones producing sIL-11R–IL-2
`protein were detected using a commercial enzyme
`immunoassay for the detection of human IL-2 (Im-
`munotech). One clone, 1.22, was selected for its
`maximal production of sIL-11R–IL-2 of about 300
`ng/ml, based on the measurement of the immuno-
`reactivity of human IL-2 in the supernatant. The
`supernatant of clone 1.22 was collected after 7 days,
`when the cell monolayer was confluent and was
`concentrated by precipitation with ammonium sulfate
`at 60% saturation. An IL-2-immunoaffinity column
`was prepared by grafting an anti-IL-2 mAb (IL-2.66,
`Immunotech) onto CNBr-activated Sepharose (Phar-
`macia, Uppsala, Sweden) following the protocol of
`the manufacturer. The concentrated supernatant was
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 3
`
`

`

`46
`
`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`dialyzed and loaded onto the column. The column
`was washed exhaustively with 50 mM Tris, 0.15 M
`NaCl pH 7.5 and eluted with 50 mM sodium acetate
`pH 4.2. The concentration of sIL-11R–IL-2 was
`determined in the fractions collected with the IL-2
`immunoassay. Active fractions were pooled, dialyzed
`against PBS and stored at 2208C. Purity of the
`product was assessed by SDS–PAGE (Miniprotean
`Ready Gels, BioRad, Ivry-sur-Seine, France). Pro-
`teins were stained with Coomassie Blue or trans-
`ferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond
`ECL, Amersham, Les Ullis, France) using a transblot
`cell (BioRad). After incubation with blocking re-
`agent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Germany),
`the membrane was probed with either the anti-IL-2
`mAb described above or anti-murine IL-11Ra rabbit
`polyclonal
`(N20),
`followed by incubation with
`appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibo-
`dies. Development was performed using an ECL
`(Enhanced ChemoLuminescence) kit (Amersham).
`
`2.4. Preparation of the soluble IL-11R/FP
`
`The soluble IL-11R/FP was prepared as described
`(Pflanz et al., 1999). Briefly, this protein contains
`domains II and III of the hIL-11Ra (amino acids
`109–318) followed by a 21 amino acid spacer linked
`to mature human IL-11. This protein does not
`contain the Ig-like domain of the hIL-11Ra. The
`gene encoding this protein was cloned into pPICZaA
`plasmid (Invitrogen). Competent P. pastoris GS115
`were transfected with pPICZaAIL-11R/ FP applying
`the LiCl method according to the manufacturer’s
`instructions. Transfected cells were selected and
`conditions for the expression of IL-11R/FP were
`optimized.
`
`2.5. Preparation of a soluble domain III protein of
`hIL-11Ra (IL-11RD3), expression in E. coli,
`folding and purification.
`
`The domain III-encoding region (amino acids
`212–337) of the hIL-11Ra, IL-11RD3, was am-
`plified by PCR using hIL-11Ra-cDNA as a template

`(Cherel et al., 1995). NcoI and BamHI sites were
`introduced into the 59- and 39-primers, respectively
`to make possible cloning of the amplified DNA in
`the corresponding sites of the E. coli expression
`
`vector pET8c/3d (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA)
`(sense primer, 59-GGT GGT GCC ATG GAG AGC
`ATC TTG CGC CCT GAC-39; anti-sense primer
`59-CCG GAA GCT TAC TCC ACC TCT GGC TGC
`GT-39). The IL-11RD3 cDNA construct was con-
`firmed by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing.
`E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Studier et al., 1990) was
`transformed with the IL-11RD3 expression vector.
`Expression of the recombinant protein was induced
`by addition of isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside
`(final concentration: 0.5 mM) for 3 h. Cells were
`harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in lysis
`buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA,
`0.2% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)).
`Complete lysis of bacteria was achieved by three
`freeze–thaw cycles followed by four steps of sonica-
`tion. The inclusion body pellet containing the recom-
`binant protein was purified through ten cycles of
`washing and centrifugation. Inclusion bodies were
`solubilized in 6 M guanidine–HCl, 50 mM Tris–
`HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM DTT. The final concentration
`of the recombinant protein was approximately 5
`mg/ml. Solubilized inclusion bodies were submitted
`to an in vitro folding process by rapid 1/100 dilution
`in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 1 mM EDTA, 200 mM
`NaCl, 1 mM DTT. The folded recombinant protein
`was purified on a Superdex 75 (26/ 60) column
`(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Fractions were ana-
`lyzed by SDS–PAGE, pooled and concentrated.
`
`2.6. IL-11/sIL-11R–IL-2 binding assay
`
`Interaction of IL-11 with sIL-11R–IL-2 was mea-
`sured by an ELISA-based binding assay using the
`purified protein sIL-11R–IL-2 as described previous-
`ly (Tacken et al., 1999).
`
`2.7. Generation of hybridoma-producing
`monoclonal anti-hIL-11Ra antibodies
`
`2.7.1. Immunization of mice with peptides and
`screening
`Peptides (Genosys, Cambridge, UK) correspond-
`ing to amino acids 23–43 (SSPCPQAWGPPGVQYG-
`QPGRS) of the N-terminal region (peptide 1) and to
`amino
`acids
`345–363
`(PPRPSLQPHRRLLDH-
`RDSV) of the C-terminal region of the extracellular
`domain of the hIL-11Ra (peptide 2) were conjugated
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 4
`
`

`

`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`47
`
`to carrier proteins, ovalbumin or KLH (Keyhole
`Limpet hemocyanin) (Pierce, USA). BALB/c mice
`(Iffa Credo, Les Oncines, France) were immunized
`three times at 3-weekly intervals with 100 mg of
`either peptide conjugated to KLH, intraperitoneally
`in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (Sigma). Three
`weeks after the final
`injection, one of the mice
`received 50 mg of peptide conjugated to ovalbumin
`intravenously and was sacrificed 3 days later. Spleen
`cells were fused with mouse myeloma X63.Ag8.653
`using polyethylene glycol 1500 (Sigma) and selected
`in standard HAT medium. Hybridoma supernatants
`were screened on 96-well plates coated with peptides
`or with sIL-11R–IL-2 protein. Positive hybridomas
`were cloned under limiting dilution and two hybrid-
`omas were established: E27 directed against
`the
`N-terminal peptide and A39R against the C-terminal
`peptide. Both antibodies recognized not only the
`immunizing peptide but also the recombinant hybrid
`protein sIL-11R–IL-2. The isotypes were determined
`using a mouse isotyping kit (Amersham). Ascitic
`fluids were generated from both hybridomas and
`purified by affinity chromatography using protein L
`(Interchim, Montlucon, France) for E27 mAb which
`is of the IgA isotype or protein A (Pharmacia) for
`A39R mAb which is of the IgG1 isotype.
`
`2.7.2. Immunization of mice with sIL-11R–IL-2
`and screening
`BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously
`twice at 3-weekly intervals with 15 mg of sIL-11R–
`IL-2 in CFA. Three weeks after the second immuni-
`zation, one mouse received intravenously 5 mg of
`sIL-11R–IL-2 and was sacrificed 3 days later. Spleen
`cells were fused as described above. Hybridoma
`supernatants were screened both on 96-well plates
`coated with sIL-11R–IL-2 or hIL-2 and by cyto-
`metric
`analysis
`on Ba/F3/130/IL-11Ra cells.
`Twelve clones, E1.8, E12.7, E10.1, I12.3, C4.2, I7.4,
`D14.7, D16.1, E24.2, C8.7, B24.3, A3.4 were estab-
`lished. All mAbs were of the IgG1 isotype. Ascitic
`fluids were generated and mAbs purified using
`protein A Sepharose (Pharmacia).
`
`2.8. Epitope analysis of anti-IL-11Ra mAbs
`
`The definition of the epitopes recognized by the
`different anti-IL-11Ra mAbs was performed in an
`
`ELISA format by cross-pairing each mAbs with all
`other mAbs. Antibodies were biotinylated with
`biotin-N-hydroxy-succinimide-1 ester (Roche Diag-
`nostic)
`following the manufacturer’s instructions.
`The 96-well plates were coated with mAbs at 5
`mg/ml in PBS for 24 h at 48C and saturated with 3%
`BSA in PBS. Then 100 ml /well of CHO-derived
`sIL-11R–IL-2 supernatant at 30 ng/ml were incu-
`bated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by three
`washes with an automatic washer (SLT, Salzburg,
`Austria). One hundred ml/well of each biotinylated
`anti-IL-11Ra mAbs at 1 mg/ml (except A39R at 5
`mg/ml) were incubated for 2 h at room temperature.
`After three additional washes, 100 ml/well of per-
`oxidase-streptavidin (1/50,000) was added and the
`plates incubated for 1 h. The enzymatic activity was
`revealed using 100 ml/well of substrate (1% tetra-
`methybenzimide, 0.1% H O in 0.1 M sodium
`2
`2
`acetate, pH 5.5). After development in the dark for
`10 min, the reaction was stopped and the absorbance
`at 450 nm was measured using an ELISA reader
`(Molecular Device, UK).
`
`2.9. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies
`
`The affinity and dissociation constants for each
`antibody were calculated by SPR studies with the
`BIAcore 2000 optical biosensor (BIAcore). Briefly,
`the chimeric sIL-11R–IL-2 protein was covalently
`linked to the activated carboxylated dextran matrix
`of the biosensor chip (CM5, BIAcore) via its primary
`amine groups, as recommended by the manufacturer.
`The coupling reaction was carried out for 7 min at a
`flow-rate of 5 ml/min at a sIL-11R–IL-2 concen-
`tration of 20 mg/ml and the chip was blocked with
`ethanolamine. A control chip was prepared by block-
`ing carboxymethyl groups directly with ethanol-
`amine. Concurrently, peptide 2 was covalently linked
`to another biosensor chip at a concentration of 2.3
`mg/ml. Anti-IL-11R mAbs were allowed to bind
`sequentially to sIL-11R–IL-2 or peptide 2 in Hepes-
`buffered saline. Concentration (a) of mAb bound to
`sIL-11R–IL-2 or peptide 2 and the reaction rates
`(da/dt) are given by the BIAlogue software. Six
`different mAb concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50
`mg/ml) were run. Regeneration of the flow cells was
`achieved with 10 mM glycine HCl pH 1.8. Kinetic
`rate constants (k
`and k
`), as well as apparent
`
`on
`
`off
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 5
`
`

`

`48
`
`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`/k )
`(K 5 k
`equilibrium dissociation constants
`on
`d
`off
`were determined using BIAlogue kinetics evaluation
`software.
`
`streptavidin–peroxidase for 1 h. Development was
`performed by ECL.
`
`2.10. Flow cytometric analysis
`
`3. Results
`
`The parental Ba /F3 cell line and transfectant Ba /
`5
`F3/130/IL-11Ra (10 cells) were stained for 1 h at
`48C with either hybridoma supernatant or anti-IL-
`11R mAbs at concentrations ranging from 0.39 to
`100 mg/ml, washed twice in wash solution (PBS /
`0.2% BSA/0.02% NaN ) and incubated for 15 min
`3
`at 48C in the dark with phycoerythrin-conjugated
`goat-anti-mouse
`antibody
`(1 /200). Cells were
`washed twice more and fixed in PBS–0.5% parafor-
`5
`maldehyde. For cell lines, 10 cells were stained for
`1 h at 48C with 2 mg of E24.2 mAb, washed twice in
`wash solution and incubated with biotin-conjugated
`goat-anti-mouse antibody (1 /100). After 15 min,
`cells were washed twice more and incubated with
`phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin (1/100)
`for
`another 15 min. Cells were then washed and fixed.
`Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were
`purified from normal donors’ whole blood by Ficoll
`density gradient separation using a standard protocol.
`PBMC were stained using the same protocol as that
`employed for the cell
`lines at antibody concen-
`trations ranging from 1.6 to 100 mg/ml. In all
`experiments, non-specific monoclonal antibody bind-
`ing was controlled by using the IgG1 isotypic control
`(Immunotech)
`to set cursors. All samples were
`analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer using Lysis
`II software (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
`
`2.11. Immunoprecipitation of recombinant murine
`IL-11RaFc chimera
`
`The recombinant murine IL-11RaFc purchased
`from R&D was immunoprecipitated with anti-IL-
`11Ra mAbs and anti-human IgGFc mAb. To avoid
`cross-reactivity of the Fc region with protein A, we
`immunoprecipitated the complexes with protein L-
`Sepharose. The bound material was eluted by boiling
`and then analyzed by SDS–PAGE. Proteins were
`transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes as de-
`scribed above. Membranes were incubated with 1
`mg/ml of biotinylated anti-human IgGFc for 1 h,
`followed, after washing steps, by incubation with
`
`3.1. Characterization of the fusion protein sIL-
`11R–IL-2
`
`Cultures of transfected CHO cells that produced a
`soluble molecule, sIL-11R–IL-2, corresponding to a
`fusion of the extracellular domain of hIL-11Ra (Fig.
`1A) to hIL-2 were established (Fig. 1B). Analysis of
`the purified sIL-11R–IL-2 fusion protein revealed
`two bands at 59 and 62 kDa,
`respectively, by
`Coomassie Blue staining (Fig. 2A) and by immuno-
`blot with either an anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody or
`a polyclonal anti-murine IL-11R antibody cross-
`reacting with hIL-11Ra, both under reducing and
`non-reducing conditions (Fig. 2B). Deglycosylation
`experiments showed that the two bands corresponded
`to two N-glycosylation states of the molecule (data
`not shown) in accord with the two predicted N-

`glycosylation sites within human IL-11Ra (Cherel et
`al., 1995). Using plates coated with sIL-11R–IL-2
`and a non-blocking anti-hIL-11 biotinylated poly-
`clonal antibody,
`the fusion protein sIL-11R–IL-2
`was shown to retain its capacity to bind IL-11 with
`an ED50 (5 nM) comparable to the affinity already
`reported for IL-11 /IL-11Ra interaction (Hilton et
`al., 1994) (Fig. 3). No signal was detected when
`BSA was employed for coating instead of sIL-11R–
`IL-2 (data not shown).
`
`3.2. Epitope analysis of anti-IL-11Ra antibodies.
`
`Using either peptides corresponding to the N- and
`C-terminal regions of hIL-11Ra or the soluble fusion
`protein sIL-11R–IL-2, we raised monoclonal anti-
`bodies against the hIL-11Ra. The mapping analysis
`of the two anti-peptide antibodies, E27 and A39R, as
`well as of the 12 antibodies generated against sIL-
`11R–IL-2, was performed using a chequer board
`ELISA format. Table 1 summarizes the reactivity of
`the 14 anti-hIL-11Ra mAbs. Epitope I was recog-
`nized by E1.8, E12.7, E10.1, I12.3, C4.2, I7.4, D14.7
`and A39R antibodies, epitope II by D16.1, E24.2,
`C8.7 and B24.3 antibodies, and epitope III by a
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 6
`
`

`

`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`49
`
`Fig. 1. Schematic representation of primary and ternary structure of the recombinant proteins and peptides. (A) Full-length hIL-11Ra: Ser23
`to Leu422; domain I: Ser23 to Leu109; domain II: Gly110 to Gly223; domain III: Leu224 to Gly318; transmembrane domain: Glu364 to
`Trp390; and cytoplasmic domain: L391 to Leu422. The region between Thr319 and Val363 is predicted to be a connecting segment between
`the extracellular domain of the hIL-11Ra and the transmembrane domain. (B) sIL-11R–IL-2: Ser23 to Val363 of the hIL-11Ra. (C) Peptide
`1: Ser23 to Ser43, peptide 2: Pro345 to Val363 of the hIL-11Ra. (D) IL-11R/FP: Leu109 to Gly318 of the hIL-11Ra, followed by a 21
`amino acid linker and human IL-11 Pro29 to Leu199. (E). IL-11RD3: Leu212 to Glu337.
`
`single antibody, A3.4. Epitope IV was defined by
`antibody E27 which was produced against the N-
`terminal peptide (peptide1) (Fig. 1C). It was the only
`mAb that recognized this region. In the course of the
`mapping experiment,
`the A39R mAb against
`the
`C-terminal peptide was found to cluster with all the
`mAbs defining epitope I,
`therefore implying that
`epitope I overlaps with the C-terminal peptide (pep-
`tide 2) (Fig. 1C) and was confirmed by direct ELISA
`on peptide 2-coated plastic: anti-epitope I antibodies
`recognized the peptide, while anti-epitope II, III and
`IV antibodies did not (data not shown). Epitope I is
`therefore located close to the transmembrane part of
`the hIL-11Ra.
`In order to map epitopes II and III more precisely,
`we took advantage of two additional recombinant
`proteins: first, the IL-11R/FP protein described by
`Pflanz et al. (1999) which was previously reported to
`
`be functional (Fig. 1D); and secondly, a protein
`corresponding to an isolated soluble domain III of
`the hIL-11Ra,
`IL-11RD3 (Fig. 1E). As shown,
`neither IL-11R/ FP (Fig. 1D) nor IL-11RD3 (Fig.
`1E) protein contains the C-terminal region of peptide
`2. Analysis of the reactivities of the anti-IL-11Ra
`mAbs with these recombinant proteins was carried
`out by immunoblotting. In Fig. 4 are shown results
`for one representative antibody for each epitope. The
`sIL-11R–IL-2 protein which is recognized by all
`antibodies was used as the positive control (Fig. 4A).
`All antibodies defining epitopes II and III bound to
`IL-11RD3 (Fig. 4C), but not to IL-11R/FP (Fig.
`4B), suggesting that
`the antibodies recognize an
`epitope located between amino acids 319 and 337.
`As expected, the antibodies defining epitope I (C-
`terminal) recognized neither of the two proteins (Fig.
`4B and C).
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 7
`
`

`

`50
`
`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`Fig. 2. Characterization of the fusion protein sIL-11R–IL-2. (A) Purified sIL-11R–IL-2 was separated by SDS–PAGE under non-reducing
`(NR) and reducing (R) conditions, and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) Purified sIL-11R–IL-2 protein was separated by SDS–PAGE under
`non-reducing and reducing conditions, and transferred onto nitrocellulose. To detect the fusion protein, the membrane was probed with
`either monoclonal anti-IL-2 or polyclonal anti-murine IL-11Ra (N20) antibody. The complex was visualized with either peroxidase-
`conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat-anti-rabbit antibody, respectively, followed by ECL.
`
`3.3. Affinity measurements
`
`Using biosensor technology, the affinity constants
`of all antibodies for sIL-11R–IL-2 and the C-termi-
`nal peptide were determined (Table 2). Except A39R
`(K
`5677 nM), all antibodies displayed
`d sIL-11R – IL-2
`high affinity for sIL-11R–IL-2 with dissociation
`constants (K ) ranging from 1.84 to 24.7 nM. When
`d
`comparing the affinities of each epitope I antibody, it
`appeared that they were similar with two exceptions.
`One was mAb A39R which recognized peptide 2
`(K
`521.6 nM) better
`than sIL-11R–IL-2
`(K
`5677 nM). Conversely, mAb C4.2
`d sIL-11R – IL-2
`had
`higher
`affinity
`for
`the
`sIL-11R–IL-2
`a
`(K
`517.5 nM) than for the peptide 2
`d sIL-11R – IL-2
`(K
`5341 nM).
`
`d peptide 2
`
`d peptide 2
`
`Fig. 3. Binding of hIL-11 to sIL-11R–IL-2. The 96-well plates
`coated with sIL-11R–IL-2 were incubated with dilutions of hIL-
`11 for 2 h. A constant concentration (500 ng/ml) of biotinylated
`goat polyclonal anti-IL-11 antibody was added for 1 h, followed
`by streptavidin–peroxidase and substrate.
`
`3.4. Flow cytometric analysis on Ba/F3130/IL-
`11R tranfectants
`
`We carried out flow cytometric analysis on Ba/ F3
`cells transfected with the signal transducer gp130
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 8
`
`

`

`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`51
`
`Table 1
`Epitope analysis of anti-hIL-11Ra antibodies
`
`a
`
`a Clustering of antibodies directed against the hIL-11Ra was carried out using a chequer board in an ELISA format. Results are expressed
`as the absorbance read at 450 nm of each well.
`
`Fig. 4. Recognition of three different sIL-11Ra molecules by anti-hIL-11Ra mAbs representative of each epitope. Purified human
`sIL-11R–IL-2 (A), partially purified IL-11R/FP (B), and purified IL-11RD3 (C) proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE under non-reducing
`conditions (left
`lanes) and reducing conditions (right
`lanes), and transferred onto nitrocellulose. The membranes were probed with
`biotinylated anti-IL-11Ra mAbs as indicated or control antibodies at 1 mg/ml. Complexes were visualized with either streptavidin–
`peroxidase (1/50 000) or peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1/2000) followed by ECL. The positive control antibody for
`IL11R/FP was polyclonal anti-IL-11, for sIL-11R–IL-2, the polyclonal anti-mouse IL-11Ra (N20). No positive control was available for
`IL-11R/D3 but we used N20 as a negative control.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1015, p. 9
`
`

`

`52
`
`C. Blanc et al. / Journal of Immunological Methods 241(2000)43–59
`
`Table 2
`Affinity constants of anti-hIL-11Ra mAbs measured by BIAcore
`
`a
`
`Epitope
`
`Antibody
`
`K (nM) for
`d
`sIL-11R–IL-2
`
`K (nM) for
`d
`peptide 2 C-terminal
`
`4.25
`24.5
`34
`6.57
`341
`32.2
`16
`21.6
`
`I
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`E1.8
`E12.7
`E10.1
`I12.3
`C4.2
`I7.4
`D14.7
`A39R
`
`B24.3
`D16.1
`E24.2
`C8.7
`
`A3.4
`
`E27
`
`1.84
`12.8
`22.8
`1.96
`17.5
`21.2
`17.5
`677
`
`7.06
`7.41
`7.65
`8.26
`
`24.7
`
`22.5
`
`a
`
`The sIL-11R–IL-2 protein and peptide 2 were immobilized on
`the sensor chip and the mAbs were analysed in the BIAcore
`system. Dissociation constants (K ) of mAbs was determined
`d
`using the kinetic constant evaluation BIAlogue.
`
`and the membrane-bound hIL-11Ra. These cells
`express hIL-11Ra at the cell surface and proliferate
`in response to hIL-11 as already reported (Lebeau et
`al., 1997). The flow cytometric titration curves are
`shown in Fig. 5. mAb A39R did not stain the
`Ba/F3-transfected cell line at all, while E27 gave
`very weak staining, which might be due to its isotype
`
`(data not shown). The antibodies defining
`(IgA)
`epitope II (E24.2, B24.3, D16.1 and C8.7 mAbs)
`stained membrane-bound hIL-11Ra most strongly.
`The mean fluorescence intensity was higher and
`obtained at lower concentrations than with epitope I
`and III antibodies (Fig. 5). It may be noted that
`antibody C4.2 behaved differently from the other
`epitope I mAbs, with a titration curve closer to those
`of the epitope II mAbs.
`
`3.5. Recognition of murine IL-11Ra by anti-human
`IL-11Ra antibodies
`
`A chimeric protein consisting of the extracellular
`domain of the murine IL-11Ra (1–345) and the Fc
`region of a human IgG was used in immuno-
`precipitation experiments to check the cross-reactivi-
`ty of the anti-IL-11Ra antibodies with murine IL-
`11Ra. All mAbs were precipitated by protein L and
`further incubated with the chimeric protein. The
`complexes were separated by SDS–PAGE and de-
`tected by immunoblotting with a biotinylated anti-
`human

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket