throbber
D3
`
`Targeted Expression of lL-11 in the Murine Airway Causes Lymphocytic
`Inflammation, Bronchial Remodeling, and AinNays Obstruction
`
`Weiliang Tang,* Gregory P. Geba,* Tao Zheng,* Prabir Ray,* Robert J. Homer}§ Charles Kuhn Ill,“ Richard A. Flavell,H
`and Jack A. Elias*
`
`*Department ofInternal Medicine, Section ofPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, *Department ofPathology, and HDepartment of
`Immunobiology, Yale University School ofMedicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520; §VA—CT Health Care System, West Haven,
`Connecticut 06516; and lDepartment ofPathology, Brown University School ofMedicine, Memorial Hospital othode Island,
`Pawtucket, Rhode Island 02860
`
`Abstract
`
`Interleukin-11 is a pleotropic cytokine produced by lung
`stromal cells in response to respiratory viruses, cytokines,
`and histamine. To further define its potential effector func-
`tions, the Clara cell 10-kD protein promoter was used to ex-
`press IL-11 and the airways of the resulting transgene mice
`were characterized. In contrast to transgene (—) littermates,
`the airways of IL-11 transgene (+) animals manifest nodu-
`lar peribronchiolar mononuclear cell infiltrates and impres-
`sive airways remodeling with subepithelial fibrosisThe in-
`flammatory foci contained large numbers of B220(+) and
`MHC Class II(+) cells and lesser numbers of CD3(+),
`CD4(+), and CD8(+) cells. The fibrotic response contained
`increased amounts of types III and I collagen, increased
`numbers of 01. smooth muscle actin and desmin-containing
`cells and a spectrum of stromal elements including fibro-
`blasts, myofibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells. Physiologic
`evaluation also demonstrated that 2-m0-old transgene (+)
`mice had increased airways resistance and non-specific air-
`ways hyperresponsiveness to methacholine when compared
`with their transgene (—) littermates. These studies demon-
`strate that the targeted expression of IL-11 in the mouse air-
`way causes a B and T cell—predominant inflammatory re-
`sponse, airway remodeling with increased types III and I
`collagen, the local accumulation of fibroblasts, myofibro-
`blasts, and myocytes, and obstructive physiologic dysregu-
`lation. IL-11 may play an important role in the inflamma-
`tory and fibrotic responses in viral and/or nonviral human
`airway disorders. (J. Clin. Invest. 1996. 98:2845—2853.) Key
`words: epithelial cell - fibrosis - cytokine - myofibroblast -
`collagen
`
`Introduction
`
`Obstructive airways disorders are a major cause of morbidity
`and mortality, with asthma affecting N 9—12 million people
`(1, 2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)1 affect-
`ing 12—14 million people (3), and bronchiolitis and bron-
`chiectasis affecting large numbers of people (4, 5)
`in the
`
`Address correspondence to Jack A. Elias, Yale University School of
`Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Depart—
`ment of Internal Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, 105 LCI, New Haven,
`CT 06520. Phone: 203—785—4163; FAX: 203—785—3826.
`Received for publication 30 May I 996 and accepted in revised form
`10 October 1996.
`
`The Journal of Clinical Investigation
`Volume 98, Number 12, December 1996, 2845—2853
`
`United States alone. Chronic airway inflammation and airway
`remodeling (defined as fibrosis, matrix alterations, and/or
`changes in structural or resident cells of the airway wall) are
`important features of these disorders (15—11). However, the
`pathogenetic mechanisms that generate these responses and
`the relationship between these responses and the physiologic
`dysregulation characteristic of these disorders are poorly un-
`derstood.
`
`Respiratory viruses play an important role in obstructive
`disorders of the human airway. Viruses are important precipi-
`tants of asthmatic exacerbations (6, 12—15) and may similarly
`exacerbate COPD (16). In addition, epidemiologic investiga-
`tions have demonstrated important associations between infan-
`tile viral infections and the existence of asthma (12, 13, 17, 18),
`and pediatric infections and COPD (16, 19) in later life. These
`viral effects are felt to be mediated via a number of mecha-
`
`nisms, including the induction and modulation of local inflam-
`mation (10, 12, 20). Virus-stimulated cytokine production is
`increasingly understood to play a prominent role in the gener-
`ation of these inflammatory abnormalities (6, 21—23). The con-
`tribution(s) that each virus-stimulated cytokine makes to the
`pathologic and physiologic abnormalities characteristic of viral
`infections in hosts with normal and obstructed airways has,
`however, been inadequately investigated. In addition, we
`know little about the mechanism(s) by which pediatric viral in-
`fections and virus-induced cytokines predispose to airways dis-
`orders in later life.
`
`IL-11 was initially discovered as a plasmacytoma prolifera-
`tion stimulating activity in supernatants from transformed
`marrow fibroblasts (24, 25). In accordance with this finding,
`most studies of IL-11 have focused on its roles in hematopoie-
`sis (25). IL-11 has, however, been shown to have a variety of
`other bioactivities, including the ability to stimulate the acute
`phase response (25), augment the production of metallopro-
`teinase inhibitors (26, 27), increase immunoglobulin produc-
`tion (25, 28), and alter neural phenotype (29). Previous studies
`from our laboratory demonstrated that human lung fibroblasts
`and epithelial cells produce IL-11 in response to cytokines (IL-1
`and TGF-Bl), histamine, and viruses that have been epidemio-
`logically associated with asthmatic exacerbations (rhinovirus,
`respiratory syncytial virus [RSV], and parainfluenza virus type
`3, [PIV3]) (21, 30, 31). Our studies have also demonstrated
`that IL-11 can be found in the nasal secretions of children with
`
`viral upper respiratory tract infections and that IL-11 induces
`
`1. Abbreviations used in this paper: AHR, airways hyperresponsive—
`ness; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CC10, clara cell 10—kD protein;
`COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MCh, methacholine;
`PIV3, parainfluenza virus type 3; RSV, respiratory synctial virus.
`
`Transgenic Expression of Interleukin-II in the Mouse Airway
`
`2845
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. l
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 1
`
`

`

`airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) when inhaled in a tran-
`sient fashion into murine lungs (23). As a result of these obser-
`vations, we postulated that IL—11 plays an important role in the
`pathogenesis of human airway disorders, particularly those
`that are associated with viral infections.
`
`In keeping with the chronic nature of disorders such as
`asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, and bronchiolitis, we addressed
`this hypothesis by defining the respiratory tract manifestations
`of IL-11 when chronically present in the respiratory tract. This
`was done by generating and evaluating the airways of trans-
`genic mice in which the Clara cell 10-kD protein (CC10) pro-
`moter was used to target IL-11 to the respiratory tree. These
`studies demonstrate that IL-11 causes impressive airway alter-
`ations with transgene (+) animals manifesting a nodular B and
`T cell—predominant peribronchiolar inflammatory response,
`bronchial remodeling with subepithelial fibrosis, and physiologic
`dysfunction characterized by airways obstruction and nonspe-
`cific AHR.
`
`Methods
`
`Production and identification of transgenic mice. To study the effec—
`tor functions of IL—11 in the airway, we took advantage of the fact
`that the murine respiratory tract epithelium contains 50—60% clara
`cells (32, 33). As previously described (32), we used the promoter of
`the CC10 gene to target the expression of human IL—11 to airway tis—
`sues. The rat CC10 promoter was a gift of Drs. Barry Stripp and Jef—
`frey Whitsett (34). It was isolated as a 2.3—kb HindIII fragment and
`subcloned into the HindIII site of construct pKS—SV40, yielding con—
`struct pKS—CC10—SV40. pKS—SV40 had been previously prepared by
`inserting a 0.85—kb BglII/BamHI fragment containing SV40 intronic
`and polyadenylation sites into the BamHI site in construct pBlue—
`script IIKS (Stratagene Inc., La Jolla, CA). The cDNA encoding hu—
`man IL—11 was a generous gift of Dr. Paul Schendel (Genetics Insti—
`tute, Cambridge, MA). It was isolated as a 1.2—kb EcoRI fragment,
`end filled with Klenow enzyme and subcloned into the EcoRV site in
`pKS—CC10—SV40 using standard techniques. All constructs were
`checked for correct orientation of the inserts by restriction enzyme
`digestion, and junction sequences were confirmed by sequencing. The
`resulting CC10—IL—11—SV40 construct was purified, digested with Asp
`718 and BamHI to generate the CC10—IL—11—SV40 fragment (Fig. 1),
`separated by electrophoresis through 1% agarose, and isolated by
`electroelution into dialysis tubing. The DNA fragment was then puri—
`fied through Elutip—D columns following the manufacturer’s instruc—
`tions (Schleicher and Schuell, Inc., Keene, NH) and dialyzed against
`injection buffer (0.5 mM Tris—HCl/25 mM EDTA, pH 7.5). Trans—
`genic mice were prepared in (CBA >< C57 BL/6) F2 eggs using stan—
`dard pronuclear injection as previously described (32, 35). The pres—
`ence or absence of the transgene was evaluated in offspring animals
`using tail—derived DNA. This was initially done by Southern blot
`analysis using 32P—labeled IL—11 cDNA as a probe. Similar results
`were obtained by PCR using 5’—CGACTGGACCGGCTGCTGC—3’
`and 5 ’—CTAACTAGGGGGAGATAATGGCGGGGGGA—3’ as up—
`per and lower primers, respectively. 35 cycles were performed. Each
`cycle was heated at 95°C for 1 min, annealed at 63°C for 1 min, and
`elongated at 72°C for 2 min.
`
`AS718
`Bam HI
`
`
`
`rat CC10 promoter
`human lL-ll (DNA SV40 sequence
`
`Tl
`+
`1.2 kb
`0.85 kb
`l‘
`2.3 kb
`
`Figure 1. Schematic illustration of CC10—IL—11 construct used in the
`preparation of the transgenic mice described in this manuscript.
`
`2846
`
`Tang et al.
`
`Bronchoalveolar lavage and quantification oflL-II levels. Mice
`were killed via cervical dislocation, a median sternotomy was per—
`formed, blood was obtained via right heart puncture and aspiration,
`and serum was prepared. The trachea was then isolated via blunt dis—
`section and small caliber tubing was inserted and secured in the air—
`way. Three successive washes of 0.75 ml PBS with 0.1% BSA were
`then instilled and gently aspirated. Each bronchoalveolar lavage
`(BAL) aliquot was centrifuged and the supernatants were harvested
`and stored individually at —70°C until ready to be used. The levels of
`IL—11 in the BAL fluid and serum were quantitated immunologically
`via ELISA and biologically using the B9.11 plasmacytoma prolifera—
`tion bioassay. The ELISA was performed as previously described by
`our laboratory (21, 30) using antibodies 11h3/15.6.1 and 11h3/19.6.1
`provided by Dr. Edward Alderman (Genetics Institute). The bioas—
`say was also performed as previously described by our laboratory
`(36, 37) using B9.11 cells also provided by Genetics Institute. Since
`both IL—6 and IL—11 can stimulate B9.11 cell proliferation, this assay
`was performed in the presence and absence of neutralizing antibodies
`against IL—11 (a gift of Dr. Alderman) and IL—6 (a gift of Dr. Pravin
`Sehgal, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY) to assess the rela—
`tive contribution of each of these moieties.
`
`Northern analysis. Total cellular RNA from a variety of mouse
`tissues was obtained using guanidine isothiocyanate extraction and
`formaldehyde—agarose gel electrophoresis as previously described
`(21, 30). IL—11 gene expression was assessed by probing with 32P—
`labeled IL—11 cDNA. Equality of sample loading and efficiency of
`transfer were assessed via ethidium bromide staining.
`Histologic evaluation. Animals were killed via cervical disloca—
`tion, median stenotomies were performed, and right heart perfusion
`was accomplished with calcium and magnesium—free PBS to clear the
`intravascular space. The heart and lungs were then removed en bloc,
`inflated with 1 cc neutral buffered 10% formalin, fixed overnight in
`10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned and stained. He—
`matoxylin and eosin, and Mallory’s trichrome stains were performed.
`Morphometric analysis. Morphometric study was carried out on
`mice aged 15 d, 1 mo, and 2 mo. The thickness of the walls of small
`airways from the base of the columnar epithelium to the outer limit of
`the adventitia was measured using an eye—piece reticle. Bronchioles
`< 250 mm in diameter that presented a closed circular or oval profile
`were selected and all measurements were made at 400 magnification
`to the nearest whole micrometer. The wall thickness was routinely
`evaluated at two points on opposite sides of the short axis of the ellip—
`tical profiles and measurements were made at locations where cell
`borders appeared sharp to minimize tangential sectioning. 5—12 air—
`ways were measured per mouse, mean 8.4. The presence or absence
`of lymphoid nodules was recorded for each bronchiolar profile,
`whether or not it was considered appropriate for measuring wall
`thickness. Statistical evaluations of the morphometric results were
`performed by the Bonferonni multiple comparisons test using Instat
`software for the Macintosh.
`
`the vascular tree
`lmmunohistochemistry. Animals were killed,
`was perfused, and the heart and lungs were removed en bloc as de—
`scribed above. The tissues were then processed using a number of ap—
`proaches. For evaluations of cell surface markers and subepithelial
`airway cellularity, lungs were inflated with 1 X PBS/33% (vol/vol)
`OCT tissue—tek compound (Miles Laboratories, Inc., Elkhart, IN)
`and snap frozen in OCT by submersion into 2—methylbutane cooled
`with dry ice. Tissue sections were cut, transferred onto silane—treated
`glass slides, fixed with acetone for 15 min, and stained with various
`antibody reagents
`as previously described (32). Sections were
`blocked with avidin—blocking kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlin—
`game, CA) and BSA before reaction with the desired biotinylated
`primary antibody. The slides were then washed three times (in 0.1 M
`Tris buffer, pH 7.5) and the tissue sections were incubated with a pre—
`diluted streptavidin—alkaline phosphatase solution (Vector Laborato—
`ries, Inc.) for 1 h. The sections were washed and developed using
`Vector red staining (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) in accordance with
`the manufacturer’s instructions. The slides were counter stained with
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. 2
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 2
`
`

`

`Meyer’s hematoxylin, and then mounted with aqueous histologic
`mounting medium (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA).
`For types I and III collagen immunostaining, mouse lungs were
`chilled in acetone containing protease inhibitors (20 mM iodoaceta—
`mide and 2 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride) at —20°C for 16—20 h.
`The lungs were then chopped into N 2 X 5 X 6 mm3 pieces and im—
`mersed three times in glycol methacrylate (GMA) monomer at 4°C
`for 6 h. The samples were then embedded in GMA according to the
`manufacturer’s instructions (JB4 Embedding Kit; Polysciences Inc.,
`Warrington, PA) and 2—ptm sections were cut and transferred onto si—
`lane—treated glass slides. Immunohistochemical staining was under—
`taken as described above except that sections were treated with 1 M
`citric acid (pH 3.0) for 2 h before staining, and primary antibody incu—
`bation took place at 4°C overnight.
`The antibodies that were employed and their sources are listed
`below. They included antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD8 (Gibco Labora—
`tories, Grand Island, NY), Mac—1 (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA),
`B220 (Pharmingen), MHC Class II (a gift from Dr. Kim Bottomly,
`Yale University), type I collagen (Chemicon International, Inc., Te—
`mecula, CA), type III collagen (a gift from Dr. J. Madri, Yale Univer—
`sity), OL-SIHOOth muscle actin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO),
`and desmin (Sigma Chemical Co.).
`Electron microscopy. Fragments of lung from three age— and sex—
`matched littermate pairs were fixed in 3% gluteraldehyde, postfixed
`in osmium tetroxide, and embedded in Epox 812 (Ernest F. Fulham,
`Inc., Latham, NY). Tissues were then cut onto grids, stained with ura—
`nyl acetate and lead nitrate, and examined in a Philips 300 micro—
`scope (Philips Electronic Instruments, Inc., Mahwah, NJ).
`Physiologic evaluation of transgenic mice. Age, sex, and weight
`matched littermate mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (90
`mg/kg) and tracheostomized with an 18—gauge angiocatheter. Air—
`ways resistance was then measured using a modification of the tech—
`niques described by Martin et al. (38) as previously described (32).
`With these techniques, the changes in the lung volumes of anesthe—
`tized and tracheostomized mice were measured plethysmographically
`by determining the pressure in a Plexiglass chamber using an inline
`microswitch pressure transducer. Flow was measured by differentia—
`tion of the volume signal and transpulmonary pressure was deter—
`mined via a second Microswitch pressure transducer placed in line
`with the plethysmograph and animal ventilator. Resistance was then
`calculated using the method of Amdur and Mead (39). The resistance
`of the tracheostomy catheter was routinely eliminated. Baseline mea—
`surements of pulmonary resistance were obtained by ventilating the
`mouse in the plethysmograph at volumes of 0.4 ml at a rate of 150
`breaths per minute (settings previously shown to produce normal ar—
`terial blood gases in this species) (38). Bronchial reactivity was also
`assessed using noncumulative methacholine challenge procedures as
`previously described by our laboratory (32). In this procedure, in—
`creasing concentrations of methacholine (MCh) in PBS were admin—
`istered by nebulization (20 one—ml breaths) using a Devilbiss Aerosonic
`nebulizer (Model 5000; DeVilbiss Health Care, Somerset, PA) that
`produces particles 1—3 ptM in diameter. Pulmonary resistance was cal—
`culated precisely 1 min later. Stepwise increases in MCh dose were
`then given until the pulmonary resistance, in comparison with the
`baseline level, had at least doubled. All animals received serial three—
`fold increases in MCh from 1 to 100 mg/ml. The data are expressed as
`the PC100 (provocative challenge 100), the dose at which pulmonary
`resistance was 100% above the baseline level as calculated by linear
`regression analysis.
`Statistical analysis. Values are expressed as meansiSEM. Unless
`otherwise noted, group means are compared with the Student’s two
`tailed unpaired t test using the StatView software for the Macintosh.
`
`Results
`
`Generation of transgenic mice. To generate transgenic mice in
`which IL-11 is overproduced in a lung-specific/selective fash-
`
`Funnéers
`
`copy 4? controls
`
`242* 3-l Ill—2*
`
`35 34% 3-9
`
`3-40
`
`x4 x16 x64
`
`(~}littermate
`
`
`4—1.2 kl)
`
`1234567891011”
`
`Figure 2. Southern blot analysis of CC10—IL—11 mice. Tail DNA was
`obtained and the presence or absence of the CC10—IL—11 construct
`was determined using Southern blot analysis as described in Methods.
`The results obtained using tail DNA from transgene (+) founder ani—
`mals (lanes 2—8) are compared with a transgene (—) littermate (lane
`1) and copy number control (lanes 9—12).
`
`ion, pronuclear microinjections of the CC10-IL-11-SV40 con-
`struct were performed on two separate occasions. From these
`microinjections, seven animals with transgene copy numbers
`varying between 1 and 70 were obtained (Fig. 2). These
`founder animals were bred with C57 BL/6 mice and the trans-
`
`gene status of these offspring were similarly analyzed. This
`analysis demonstrated that the transgenes passed on to the off-
`
`Muuse Tissue RNA
`
`0
`
`me
`ta
`3:5m_
`
`Kidney Liver
`
`Lung Muscle
`
`Pancrea
`
`Spleen Uterus
`
`Skin
`
`
`S] HuIL-llcontrol
`
`
`Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of IL—11 mRNA expression in mouse
`organs. Total cellular RNA was isolated from the noted organs of
`transgene (+) CC10—IL—11 mice and the levels of IL—11 mRNA char—
`acterized using Northern blot analysis as described in Methods. The
`IL—11 mRNA in total cellular RNA from the different tissues is com—
`
`pared with the IL—11 mRNA in TGF—Bl (10 ng/ml)—stimulated human
`lung fibroblasts (Hu lL-II control). Ethidium bromide controls are in
`bottom panel.
`
`Transgenic Expression of Interleukin-11 in the Mouse Airway
`
`2847
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. 3
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Figure 5. Histologic abnormalities in airways of CC10—IL—11 trans—
`genic mice. The lungs of transgene (+) and (—) animals were re—
`moved, fixed, and evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin and
`trichrome stains. The histologic appearance of the transgene (—)
`mouse lung (A) is compared with the peribronchiolar lymphocytic in—
`filtrates and bronchiolar thickening in the transgene (+) animals (B
`and C). The collagen content of the lungs of transgene (—) animals
`appears in green in D. This contrasts with the impressive subepithe—
`lial fibrosis seen in the airways of transgene (+) animals (E). (Origi—
`nal magnification 67.5>< .)
`
`Eflect ofIL-11 on murine airways. Progeny mice were killed
`at various intervals between 0.5 and 2 mo of age, and the air-
`ways of transgene (+) and (—) littermates were compared. A
`total of 78 age and sex matched littermate pairs were evalu-
`ated. In contrast with their transgene (—)
`littermates. the
`transgene (+) animals manifest an impressive airway pheno-
`type oomposed of: (a) nodular collections of lymphocyte-like
`cells next to bronchi and bronchioles. and (b) airway wall
`thickening and remodeling (Fig. 5. A—C). The collections of
`lymphocytes were appreciated less often in the 0.5-mo-old ani-
`mals. but were prominently noted in the 1- and 2-mo-old ani-
`mals (data not shown). The impressive and progressive effects
`of IL—11 on the thickness of the airway wall were easily seen in
`the morphometric evaluations (Fig. 6). Insight into the cause
`of this thickening and remodeling was obtained from the
`trichrome evaluations. These stains demonstrated only small
`amounts of collagen in the lungs of transgene (—) animals.
`This contrasted with the extensive subepithelial fibrosis seen in
`the airways of the IL—11 transgene (+) animals (Fig. 5,1) and E).
`Composition ofperibronchiolar nodules. The results noted
`above demonstrate that IL-11 overexpression in the murine
`airway generates nodular collections of lymphocyte-like mono-
`nuclear cells. The phenotype of these cells was. therefore. ana-
`lyzed by immunohistochemistry using frozen lung sections.
`These studies demonstrated that the majority of the cells in
`these nodules were MHC Class II (+) and B220 (+) (Fig. 7).
`Collections of CD3(+). CD4(+). and CD8(+) cells were also
`noted (Fig. 6). Significant Mac-1 immunoreactivity was not
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. 4
`
`
`
`
`BAL
`__
`2/ Serum
`
`Positive
`Negative
`Transgene Status
`
`EB
`
`) 2
`i:
`V
`
`IL-11
`
`Figure 4. Levels of immunoreactive IL—11 in BAL fluid and serum of
`transgene (+) and ( —) littermates. The noted values represent the
`mean: SEM of the evaluations of four separate pairs of transgene
`(+) and (—) littermates (*P < 0.01 vs. serum of transgene (+) ani—
`mals and BAL and serum of transgene (—) animals; paired ttest).
`
`spring of these founder animals in a Mendelian fashion. Of
`these founders. lines 2-12 and 3-2 were chosen for more exten-
`sive analysis. Since they manifest similar pathologic. immuno-
`logic. and physiologic abnormalities. they will be discussed in a
`unified fashion.
`
`Organ specificity and intensity ofIL-1 1 gene expression and
`protein production. To determine if the CClO-IL—ll transgene
`was appropriately expressed. Northern analysis was used to
`compare the levels of IL-11 mRNA in the lungs and extrapul-
`monary organs of transgene (+) and (—) littermates. IL-ll
`mRNA was readily detected in the lungs of transgene (+) ani-
`mals. but could not be appreciated in the lungs of transgene
`(—) animals (Fig. 3 and data not shown). In accordance with in
`Vitro studies using fibroblasts and epithelial cells (21. 30). this
`IL-ll mRNA appeared to have one major and one minor tran-
`script. IL-11 gene expression also appeared to be appropri-
`ately targeted to the lung since human IL-ll mRNA was not
`detectable in the RNA from a variety of extrapulmonary organs
`(Fig. 3). In all cases. IL-ll mRNA appeared to be appropri-
`ately translated since IL-11 was easily detected immunologically
`and biologically in the BAL fluid of the transgene (+) animals.
`but not in the serum of transgene (+) animals or the serum or
`BAL fluid of transgene (—) littermates (Fig. 4 and Table I).
`
`Table I. IL-Il Bioactivity in BAL Fluids From Transgene (+)
`and (—) Animals
`
`[3H]-Tdr incorporationl
`
`Incubation conditions"
`
`No antibody
`
`+ AntiiIL-ll
`
`BAL (—)
`BAL (--)
`
`BAL (--)
`Negative control
`
`3,178:3,708
`57,383:5,351
`52,960:4,717
`1,896:101
`
`1,705il66
`5,568i378
`6,189:5,507
`—
`
`*BAL were performed on transgene (+) and (7) littermate F2 progeny
`of IL—11 transgenic mice. *B9.11 plasmacytoma [3H]—Tdr incorporation
`assessed in the presence and absence of anti—IL—ll. BAL plasmacy—
`toma—stimulating activities are compared with the proliferation (PH]—Tdr
`incorporation) of B911 cells incubated in medium alone (negative con—
`trol). Values represent the meaniSEM of triplicate determinations.
`
`2848
`
`Tang et al.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`Figure 8. Immunohistochemical analysis of fibrotic response in
`CC10—IL—11 transgenic mice. Immunohistochemistry was used to
`evaluate the type I collagen in the airways of transgene (+) (A) and
`(—) (C) animals and the type III collagen in the airways of transgene
`(+) (B) and (—) (D) animals. (Original magnification 50X.)
`
`Composition of the subepithelial fibrotic response. Studies
`were undertaken to determine if types I or III collagen were
`increased in the airways of the transgene (+) animals. These
`immunohistochemical evaluations demonstrated modest in-
`
`creases in type I collagen and impressive increases in type III
`collagen in transgene (+) vs. (—) animals (Fig. 8). Thus, the
`subepithelial fibrosis seen in CC10-IL-11 transgenic animals
`results, at least in part, from the increased accumulation of
`type III and, to a lesser extent, type I collagens.
`Immu-
`Structural characterization of the transgenic airway.
`nohistochemistry and electron microscopy were used to fur-
`ther characterize the cellular and structural alterations in the
`
`airways of the CC10-IL-11 transgene (+) animals. The immu-
`nohistochemical evaluations demonstrated an increase in the
`
`
`
`Figure 9. Immunohistochemical evaluation of subepithelial cellular—
`ity in CC10—IL—11 mice. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate
`the cellular components of the subepithelial fibrotic response in
`CC10—IL—11 transgene (+) and (—) animals. A and C represent the
`OL—SIHOOth muscle actin immunoreactivity in transgene (—) and (+)
`animals, respectively. B and D represent the desmin immunoreac—
`tivity in transgene (—) and (+) animals, respectively. (Original
`magnification 50>< .)
`
`Transgenic Expression of Interleukin-11 in the Mouse Airway
`
`2849
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. 5
`
`*
`
`i
`
`*
`
`——0— Transgene (+)
`—O— Transgene (-)
`
`i
`
`0 . 5
`Age
`
`1 . 0
`(months)
`
`1 . 5
`
`2 . 0
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`. 0
`
`o0
`
`Ee
`
`.2
`E(I)
`m
`E.2
`if
`_
`
`E 3
`
`OE
`
`E
`
`O S m
`
`Figure 6. Morphometric analysis of airway wall thickening of
`CC10—IL—11 animals. The thickness of the bronchioles of 0.5—, 1—, and
`2—mo—old transgene (+) and (—) littermates were measured as de—
`scribed in Methods. Values represent the mean: SEM of at least
`three pairs of animals at each time point (*P < 0.001 Bonferonni
`Multiple comparisons test).
`
`appreciated with only a rare cell staining with this antibody
`(Fig. 7). None of the antibodies that were used reacted with
`the airways in sections of lung from transgene (—) mice, in
`great extent because of the lack of airway inflammation in
`these animals (data not shown). These observations demonstrate
`that these nodules are composed of large numbers of B lym-
`phocytes and lesser numbers of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells.
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 7. Immunohistochemistry of peribronchiolar nodular infil—
`trates. Immunohistochemical techniques were used to evaluate the
`cellular composition of the peribronchiolar infiltrates seen in the
`transgene (+) CC10—IL—11 animals. Antibodies against B220 (A),
`MHC class II (B), CD3 (C), CD4 (D), CD8 (E), and Mac—1 (F) were
`employed. (Original magnification 50>< .)
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 10. Electron microscopic ap—
`pearance of peripheral airway of
`CC10—IL—11 mice. (A) Low power
`View of airway wall with epithelial
`cells (EP), myocytes (M), and fibro—
`blastic cells (P). Note intact base—
`ment membrane (open arrows) and
`collagen deposition (C) (4,000><).
`(B) Smooth muscle cell with well
`formed Golgi (G). Note myofilaments
`(MF) (18,000X ). (C) Fibroblast with
`rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER)
`(18,000X). (D) Myofibroblast with
`subplasmalemmal dense body (open
`arrow) and basal lamina (closed
`arrow) (36,000X). (E) Myofibro—
`blast with myofilaments (MF) and
`subplasmalemmal vesicles (open
`arrow) (36,000X).
`
`number of Cl smooth muscle actin and desmin staining cells in
`the walls of the transgene (+) vs. (—) animals (Fig. 9). This
`staining was not uniform. however. with some stromal cells
`failing to manifest either of these markers. The electron micro-
`graphs demonstrated that the CC10-IL-11 transgene (+) ani-
`mals had normal basement membranes and enhanced striated
`
`collagen deposition (Fig. 10). They also demonstrated the ac-
`cumulation of a variety of stromal cells in these fibrotic loca-
`tions. Ultrastructurally. many cells appeared to be fibroblasts.
`Others appeared to be myofibroblasts based on their fibro-
`blast-like appearance and the presence of myofilaments. dense
`bodies. subplasmalemmal vesicles. and/or identifiable basal
`lamina (Fig. 10 and data not shown). Smooth muscle cells with
`abundant myofilaments were also appreciated. Some of these
`cells showed morphologic evidence of increased synthetic ac-
`tivity with increased rough endoplasmic reticulum and promi-
`nent Golgi (Fig. 10). Thus. the subepithelial response in the
`airways of the CC10-IL-11 transgene (+) animals occurs in the
`absence of basement membrane thickening and is character-
`ized by increased interstitial collagen deposition and height-
`ened stromal cellularity with the local accumulation of fibro-
`blasts. myofibroblasts. and smooth muscle cells.
`Effect of IL-1 1 on airway physiology. Airways obstruction
`and hyperresponsiveness to nonspecific stimuli such as MCh
`are prominent features of asthma. COPD. and a variety of dis-
`eases characterized by chronic airways inflammation and/or
`
`2850
`
`Tang et al.
`
`
`
`fibrosis, Thus. studies were undertaken to characterize the
`physiologic profile of IL-11 transgene (+) and (—) animals.
`Overall. 18 age. sex. and weight matched littermate pairs were
`evaluated. The baseline airways resistance of IL-11 transgene
`(--) animals greatly exceeded that of IL-11 transgene (—) ani-
`mals. At 2 mo of age. the airways resistance of the transgene
`(--) animals was approximately threefold greater than the
`resistance of the transgene (—) animals (7453:2275 vs.
`227.5:64 cm HzO/liters per s; P < 0.05). In addition. 1.5—2-
`mo-old transgene (+) animals manifest exaggerated sensitivity
`to methacholine since they achieved a 100% increase in air-
`ways resistance at 1/10 to 1/100 the dose of methacholine re-
`quired by their transgene (—) littermate controls (Fig. 11).
`When viewed in combination. these studies demonstrate that
`IL-11 transgene (+) animals manifest increased airways resis-
`tance and airways hyperresponsiveness to MCh when com-
`pared with transgene (—) littermate controls.
`
`Discussion
`
`Airway inflammation and fibrosis are prominent features of a
`variety of disorders including asthma. COPD. bronchiectasis.
`and bronchiolitis (3—11). In these disorders. the relationship(s)
`between inflammation. fibrosis, and physiologic dysregulation.
`and the contribution that individual mediators make to the
`
`pathogenesis of these abnormalities are poorly understood.
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1009, p. 6
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1009, p. 6
`
`

`

`300'
`
`200'
`
`baseline)
`
`RespiratoryResistance(%Increaseover
`
`100‘
`
`0
`
`1
`
`V
`
`'
`
`1'0
`
`1 00
`
`log MCh Dose (mg/ml)
`
`Figure 11. Methacholine sensitivity of transgene (—) and (+) mice.
`The effect of varying concentrations of methacholine on the airways
`resistance of paired transgene (+) (O) and transgene (—) (I) litter—
`mates were evaluated as described in Methods. Values represent the
`mean: SEM of six age and sex matched littermates evaluated on the
`same day (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ttest).
`
`This is due. in great extent. to the complexity of the inflamma-
`tory and fibrotic responses in these disorders. which precludes
`the clear attribution of cause and effect. It is also the result of
`
`our need to rely on in Vitro and acute challenge in Vivo proto-
`cols in our modeling of these disorders. The limitations of our
`present approach are nicely illustrated with IL-11. In Vitro
`studies from our laboratory and others have clearly demon-
`strated that this cytokine is produced by a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket