throbber

`
`mi,
`
`-
`
` ”epro ~
`
`momma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ l
`
`j
`
`_
`
`l i
`
`.
`
`:32
`
`
`
`ijournalaf
`Immunology
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`This information is current as
`of November 2, 2017-
`
`.
`IL-11 Receptor 0c in the Pathogenesis of
`IL-13-Induced Inflammatlon and Remodellng
`Qingsheng Chen, Lesley Rabach, Paul Noble, Tao Zheng,
`Chun Geun Lee, Robert J. Homer and Jack A. Elias
`
`Jlmmunol 2005; 174230523 13; ;
`doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.4.2305
`http ://www.j immunol.org/content/ 1 74/4/23 05
`
`Why The JI?
`
`° Speedy Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication * average
`
`° Rapid Reviews! 30 days" from submission to initial decision
`
`° No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists
`
`References
`
`This article cites 59 articles, 18 of which you can access for free at:
`http ://www.j immunolorg/content/ 1 74/4/23 05 .full#ref—list- 1
`
`Subscription
`
`Information about subscribing to The Journal ofImmunology is online at:
`http ://j immunol . org/sub scription
`
`Permissions
`
`Submit copyright permission requests at:
`http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html
`
`Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at:
`http ://_j immunol . org/alerts
`
`The Journal ofImmunology is published twice each month by
`The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.,
`1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852
`Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of
`Immunologists All rights reserved.
`Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606.
`
`
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. l
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJoqtquoNnolsonfi[{q/T§10'[otmm1u[[‘mzx\.w/zch1q11101;popeommoq
`
`
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 1
`
`

`

`The Journal of Immunology
`
`IL-11 Receptor a in the Pathogenesis of IL-13-Induced
`Inflammation and Remodeling1
`
`Qingsheng Chen,2* Lesley Rabach,2* Paul Noble,* Tao Zheng, Chun Geun Lee,*
`Robert J. Homer,H and Jack A. Elias3*
`
`IL-13 is a major stimulator of inflammation and tissue remodeling at sites of Th2 inflammation. In Th2-dominant inflammatory
`disorders such as asthma, IL-11 is simultaneously induced. However, the relationship(s) between IL-11 and IL-13 in these re-
`sponses has not been defined, and the role(s) of IL-11 in the genesis of the tissue effects of IL-13 has not been evaluated. We
`hypothesized that IL-11, signaling via the IL-11Ra-gp130 receptor complex, plays a key role in IL-13-induced tissue responses.
`To test this hypothesis we compared the expression of IL-11, IL-llRa, and gp130 in lungs from wild-type mice and transgenic mice
`in which IL-13 was overexpressed in a lung-specific fashion. We simultaneously characterized the effects of a null mutation of
`IL-llRa on the tissue effects of transgenic IL-13. These studies demonstrate that IL-13 is a potent stimulator of IL-11 and
`IL-llRa. They also demonstrate that IL-13 is a potent stimulator of inflammation, fibrosis, hyaluronic acid accumulation, myo-
`fibroblast accumulation, alveolar remodeling, mucus metaplasia, and respiratory failure and death in mice with wild-type IL-
`llRa loci and that these alterations are ameliorated in the absence of IL-llRa. Lastly, they provide insight into the mechanisms
`of these processes by demonstrating that IL-13 stimulates CC chemokines, matrix metalloproteinases, mucin genes, and gob-5 and
`stimulates and activates TGF-Bl via IL-llRa-dependent pathways. When viewed in combination, these studies demonstrate that
`IL-llRa plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. The Journal of Immunology, 2005,
`174: 2305—2313.
`
`I nterleukin—l3 is a pleiotropic 12—kDa product of a gene on
`
`chromosome 5 at q3l that is produced in large quantities by
`stimulated Th2 cells. It was originally described as an IL—4—
`like molecule based on shared eifector properties, including the
`ability to stimulate IgE production. Subsequent studies demon—
`strated that IL—13 and E—4 often play distinct roles in biology. A
`prominent aspect of this distinction is the appreciation that E—4
`plays a key role in Th2 cell diiferentiation and response generation,
`whereas IL—l3 contributes as the major eifector of Th2 inflamma—
`tion and tissue remodeling (1—4). In accord with these observa—
`tions, IL—l3 dysregulation has been documented, and IL—13 has
`been implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases char—
`acterized by inflammation and tissue remodeling,
`including
`asthma, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, scleroderma, Viral pneumo—
`nia, hepatic fibrosis, nodular sclerosing Hodgkin’s disease, and
`
`*Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and lDepartment of Pathology,
`Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520; and 1:Pathology and
`Laboratory Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs-Connecticut Health Care System,
`West Haven, CT 06516
`Received for publication September 13, 2004. Accepted for publication November
`22, 2004.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
`charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance
`with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`1This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL64242,
`HL78744, HL66571, and HL56389 (to J.A.E.).
`
`2 Q.C. and LR. made equal contributions to this work.
`3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jack A. Elias, Section of Pul-
`monary and Critical Care Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 Cedar
`Street (S441 TAC), P.O. Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520-8057. E-mail address:
`jack.elias @yale.edu
`4 Abbreviations used in this paper: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
`BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; HA, hyaluronic acid; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase;
`Tg, transgenic; Timp, tissue inhibitor of MMP; WT, wild type; TARC, thymus and
`activation-regulated chemokine.
`
`chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)4 (1—11). Studies
`from our laboratory and others have demonstrated that IL—13 me—
`diates its tissue eifects by activating a broad array of downstream
`target genes,
`including chemokines, matrix metalloproteinases
`(MMPs), TGF—Bl, and chitinases (12—16). The importance of Ur
`6—type cytokines in the generation of the eifects of IL—l3, however,
`have not been investigated.
`IL—11 is a multifunctional E—6—type cytokine with diverse bio—
`logic properties, including the ability to stimulate hemopoiesis,
`thrombopoiesis, megakaryocytopoiesis, and bone resorption; reg—
`ulate macrophage diiferentiation; and confer mucosal protection
`after chemotherapy and radiation therapy (17—22). These eifects
`are mediated by a multimeric receptor that contains a ligand—bind—
`ing a subunit, IL—llRa, and the ubiquitous B subunit, gpl30, that
`triggers intracellular signaling (18, 23, 24). Previous studies from
`our laboratory and others demonstrated that, like IL—l3, IL—11 is
`expressed in an exaggerated fashion in the dysregulated Th2 re—
`sponse in the asthmatic airway (25). Although IL—ll can inhibit
`Thl responses,
`inhibit the production of Thl—related cytokines
`such as E—l2, and shift inflammation in a Th2 direction (22, 26—
`29), little else is known about the role(s) of IL—11 in the generation
`and/or expression of Th2 tissue responses. In particular, interac—
`tions between IL—11 and IL—13 have not been defined, and a role
`for IL—11 in the genesis of HIE—induced pathologies has not been
`established.
`
`We hypothesized that HIM signaling plays a key role in Hf
`l3—induced Th2 inflammation. To test this hypothesis, we charac—
`terized the expression of IL—1 1, IL—1 lRa, and gpl30 in lungs from
`wild—type (WT) mice and mice in which IL—13 was overexpressed
`in a lung—specific fashion. We also characterized the eifects of a
`null mutation of E—llRa on the tissue eifects of transgenic IL—l3.
`These studies demonstrate that HIE is a potent stimulator of
`IL—11 and IL—llRa. They also demonstrate that E—llRa plays a
`
`key role in E—l3—induced inflammation, :fi 0,9,;7hyaluronic acid
`
`Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
`
`0022-1767/05/$02.00
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. 2
`
`
`
`“oz‘z.19querNno189113[{q,1310'10unu1uuf‘mmm,l:duq11101;pepeommoq
`
`
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 2
`
`

`

`2306
`
`IL—11 AND PATHOGENESIS OF E—13 PHENOTYPE
`
`Quantification of lung collagen
`
`Collagen content was determined biochemically by quantifying total sol—
`uble collagen using the Sircol collagen assay kit (Biocolor) according to
`the manufacturer’s instructions (15). The data are expressed as the collagen
`content of the entire right lung. Collagen was also assessed morphometri—
`cally using picosirius red staining, performed as described previously by
`our laboratory (15). These data are expressed as the percentage of the
`histologic section with picosirius red staining.
`
`Quantification of HA
`
`The levels of BAL HA were measured using a competitive ELISA using
`biotinylated HA—binding protein as described previously (34, 35). Micro—
`titer plates were coated with HA by combining rooster comb HA, carbo—
`diimide HCl, and HCl. Samples were incubated with biotinylated HA—
`binding protein for 1 h and then added to the wells. The plate was then
`agitated, washed, developed with HRP—streptavidin, and exposed to per—
`oxidase substrate for 30 min. OD at 405 nm was evaluated. Samples were
`compared with a simultaneously performed standard curve.
`
`TGF— B bioassay
`
`The levels of total and bioactive TGF—Bl were evaluated by ELISA (R&D
`Systems) using untreated and acid—treated BAL fluids according to the
`manufacturer’s instructions.
`
`Murine 100% 02 exposure
`
`Adult 6— to 8—wk—old Tg’ and TgJr mice with WT or null mutant IL—11Ra
`loci were exposed to room air (controls) or continuously to 100% O2 in a
`Plexiglas chamber as previously described (19, 36). All protocols were
`reviewed and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee
`at Yale University School of Medicine.
`
`Statistics
`
`Normally distributed data are expressed as the mean : SEM and assessed
`for significance by Student’s t test or ANOVA as appropriate. Data that
`were not normally distributed were assessed for significance using the Wil—
`coxon rank—sum test.
`
`Results
`Efiect of IL—13 on IL—11 and IL—1 1R expression
`Studies were undertaken to define the eifects of IL—13 on IL—11 and
`
`its receptor components in murine lung. These studies demon—
`strated that transgenic IL—13 is a potent stimulator of the expres—
`sion of HIM and IL—11Ra. These eifects were readily apparent at
`all time points evaluated (1—4 mo; Fig. 1 and data not shown). The
`induction of IL—11 was associated with similar increases in the
`
`including
`levels of mRNA encoding other E—6—type cytokines,
`E—6 and LIF (Fig. 1). A modest increase in gp130 expression was
`also observed (Fig. 1). Similar alterations in M—CSF, GM—CSF,
`stem cell factor, L32, and GAPDH, however, were not found. The
`alterations in IL—1 1Ra were also at least partially specific, because
`
`
`
`
`GM‘CEF
`
`MAC}; m
`
`n. mum
`w “,4!va
`
`w [1.45m
`-- @9130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“ IFNvflu
`m [map
`
`... Ml
`.JJM’DH
`
`(HA) accumulation, myofibroblast accumulation, alveolar remod—
`eling, mucus metaplasia, and respiratory failure and death. Lastly,
`they provide insights into the mechanisms of these processes by
`demonstrating that IL—13 stimulates CC chemokines, MMPs, mu—
`cin genes, and gob—5 and stimulates and activates TGF—Bl via
`HI 1 1Ra—dependent pathways.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Overexpression transgenic mice
`
`CC10—IL—13 transgenic mice were generated in our laboratory, bred onto a
`C57BL/6 background, and used in these studies. These mice use the Clara
`cell 10—kDa protein (CC10) promoter to target IL—13 to the lung. The meth—
`ods used to generate and characterize these mice were described previously
`(30). In this modeling system, IL—13 caused a mononuclear cell— and eosi—
`nophil—rich tissue inflammatory response, alveolar enlargement, subepithe—
`lial and parenchymal fibrosis, mucus metaplasia, and respiratory failure
`and death, as previously described (12, 13, 30).
`IL—11Ra—null mice (IL—11111147) were provided by Drs. L. Robb and C.
`Glenn Begley (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Victoria, Australia) (31, 32).
`These mice were bred for more than eight generations onto a C57BL/6
`genetic background. CC10—IL—13 mice with WT+I+ and null’/’ IL—11Ra
`loci were generated by breeding the IL—13 transgenic (TgT) mice with the
`IL—11Ra”’ animals. Genotyping was accomplished as previously de—
`scribed (30, 32). Littermate control WT mice with (+/+) or without (—/—)
`IL—11Ra loci were used as controls.
`
`Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)
`
`Lung inflammation was assessed by BAL as previously described (13, 33).
`The BAL samples from each animal were then pooled and centrifuged. The
`number and types of cells in the cell pellet were determined as previously
`described (12, 13). The supernatants were stored at —20°C until used.
`
`Lung volume and morphometric assessments
`
`Animals were anesthetized, the trachea was cannulated, and the lungs were
`removed and inflated with PBS at 25 cm. The size of each lung was eval—
`uated via volume displacement, and alveolar size was estimated from the
`mean chord length of the airspace, as previously described by our labora—
`tory (13). Chord length increases with alveolar enlargement.
`
`Histologic evaluation
`
`Animals were killed, a median sternotomy was performed, and right heart
`perfusion was accomplished with calcium— and magnesium—free PBS. The
`heart and lungs were then removed en bloc, inflated at 25 cm pressure with
`neutral—bulfered 10% formalin, fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in par—
`aflin, sectioned, and stained. H&E, Mallory’s Trichrome, and periodic ac—
`id—Schilf with diastase stains were performed at Yale University School of
`Medicine.
`
`mRNA analysis
`
`The levels of mRNA encoding IL—11 and IL—11Ra were evaluated with a
`commercial RNase protection assay (BD Rionuant; BD Biosciences) as
`described by the manufacturer. Other mRNA levels were evaluated by
`RT—PCR analysis as previously described (13). The primers used have been
`described previously (12, 13, 15, 16). For each cytokine, the optimal num—
`bers of cycles that will produce a quantity of cytokine product that is
`directly proportional to the quantity of input mRNA was determined ex—
`perimentally. B—Actin was used as an internal standard. Amplified PCR
`products were detected using ethidium bromide gel electrophoresis, quan—
`titated electronically, and confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.
`
`Quantification of IL—13 and chemokines
`
`BAL IL—13 and chemokine levels were quantitated using commercial
`ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`
`Immunohistochemistry
`
`a—Smooth muscle actin and myosin H chain staining cells were evaluated
`by immunohistochemistry as previously described by our laboratory (15).
`The primary Abs were obtained from DakoCytomation. Specificity was
`assessed by comparing the staining of serial sections that were incubated in
`the presence and the absence of the primary Ab.
`
`IL—13 regulation of IL—11Ra and IL—11. Lungs were ob—
`FIGURE 1.
`tained from 2—mo—old CC10—IL—13 Tg’ and Tg+ mice, and the levels of
`mRNA encoding the noted cytokines, proteins, and receptors were evalu—
`ated using RNase protection. Each lane represents an individual animal.
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJQQUIQAONno189113[{q,1310'[ounmturf'mmn/,I:duq11101;pepBOIHMOG
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 3
`
`

`

`The Journal of Immunology
`
`2307
`
`comparable alterations in the expression of E—6Ra and IFN—yRa
`were not observed (Fig. 1). These studies demonstrate that IL—13 is
`a potent stimulator of IL—11 and the a subunit of its receptor in
`murine lung.
`
`Role of IL—1 1R signaling in IL—I3—induced inflammation
`
`To address the importance of IL—11 in the pathogenesis of IL—13—
`induced tissue inflammation, CC10—IL—13 transgenic mice were
`bred with HJ—llRoF/T mice. The inflammatory responses in HIE
`Tg+ mice with WT and null E—llRa loci were then compared. As
`previously reported (12, 30), IL—13 was a potent stimulator of tis—
`sue inflammation that caused a progressive increase in the accu—
`mulation of macrophages, lymphocytes, and eosinophils in the tis—
`sues and BAL fluids of IL—13 Tg+ mice with normal E—llRa loci.
`In the absence of E—llRa, an impressive decrease in this inflam—
`matory response was noted. In 2— and 4—mo—old mice, impressive
`decreases in BAL total cell, macrophage, and eosinophil recovery
`were noted (Fig. 2, A and B). A similarly, impressive decrease in
`tissue inflammatory cell accumulation was apparent (Fig. 2C and
`data not shown). In BAL and tissues, compensatory increases in
`neutrophils were not noted (Fig. 2).
`
`Role of IL—IIRa in IL—I3—induced chemokine elaboration
`
`Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that IL—13 in—
`duces its tissue alterations in part via the induction of a wide array
`
`of CC chemokines (12). To investigate the mechanism by which
`E—llRa deficiency diminished HIE—induced inflammation, we
`compared the expression of selected chemokines in IL—13 Tg+
`mice with WT and null E—llRa loci. In Tg’ mice with WT or
`null IL—11Ra loci, the levels of mRNA encoding MCP—l/CCL2,
`MCP—2/CCL8, MCP—3/CCL7, MIP—la/CCL—3, MIP—lB/CCL4,
`MIP—2/CXCL—2/3, MIP—3ot/CCL20, C10/CCL—6, eotaxin/CCL—11,
`eotaxin—2/CCL21, and thymus and activation—regulated chemokine
`(TARC)/CCL17 were comparable and in many cases were near or
`below the limits of detection of our assays (Fig. 3A). As previously
`reported (12, 37), IL—13 increased the levels of mRNA encoding
`these chemokine moieties in Tg+ mice with WT E—llRa loci
`(Fig. 3A). In contrast, in the absence of E—llRa, the ability of
`IL—13 to induce MCP—l/CCL2, MCP—2/CCL8, MCP—3/CCL7,
`MIP—la/CCL3, MIP—lB/CCL4, MIP—2/CXCL2—3, MIP—3a/
`CCL20, C10/CCL6,
`eotaxin/CCL11,
`eotaxin—2/CCL21,
`and
`TARC/CCL17 was markedly diminished (Fig. 3A). In accord with
`these mRNA alterations, comparable alterations in BAL MCP—l/
`CCL2, MIP—la/CCL—3, and eotaxin/CCL—11 protein were ob—
`served (Fig. 3, B—D). Thus, E—llRa plays an essential role in the
`stimulation of selected chemokines by IL—13.
`
`
`myofibroblast accumulation
`
`Quantitative morphometric, biochemical, and immunohistochem—
`ical approaches were used to define the role of IL—11Ra in HIE—
`induced pulmonary fibrosis and HA and myofibroblast accumula—
`tion.
`In these studies, we compared these collagen, HA, and
`cellular parameters in IL—13 Tg+ mice with WT and null E—llRa
`loci. Similar amounts of collagen and BAL HA and similar num—
`bers of anti—smooth muscle actin—staining parenchymal cells were
`noted in lungs from WT littermate control mice and IL—11RoF/T
`animals (Fig. 4). In WT mice, HIE caused an impressive increase
`in lung collagen content (Fig. 4, A and B) and BAL HA levels (Fig.
`4C) that could be easily determined by histochemical and bio—
`chemical measurement techniques. In addition, HIE increased the
`accumulation of parenchymal myofibroblast—like cells that con—
`tained anti—smooth muscle actin, but did not stain with Abs against
`smooth muscle myosin (Fig. 4D and data not shown). In contrast,
`the levels of HIE—induced collagen and HA were significantly
`reduced in lungs from Tg+ mice with null vs WT IL—11Ra loci
`(Fig. 4, A—C). Myofibroblast accumulation was similarly decreased
`in lungs from IL—13 Tg+/IL—11R0F/’ mice compared with Tg+/
`HJ—llRotH+ animals (Fig. 4D).
`Interestingly,
`the anti—smooth
`muscle actin staining of vascular smooth muscle cells was not
`altered in the absence of IL—1 1Ra (Fig. 4D). Thus, HIM signaling
`plays a critical role in HIE—induced tissue 11
`3
`
`myofibroblast accumulation.
`
`Role of IL—IIRa in IL—I3—induced production and activation of
`TGF431
`
`Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that the fibrotic
`eflects of IL—13 are mediated by its ability to induce and activate
`TGF—Bl and that this activation is mediated to a great extent by
`MMP—9 (15). To define the importance of IL—11Ra in these re—
`sponses, we evaluated the TGF—Bl production of Tg+ mice with
`WT and null IL—11Ra loci. In mice with a WT IL—11Ra locus,
`IL—13 was a potent stimulator of the levels of mRNA encoding
`TGF—Bl, TGF—B2, and TGF—B3 (Fig. 5A). IL—13 also augmented
`MMP—9 mRNA accumulation (Fig. 5A). In accord with these ob—
`servations, IL—13 increased the levels of spontaneously activated
`and total TGF—Bl protein in BAL fluids from these animals (Fig.
`5, B and C). In all cases, these inductive eflects appeared to be
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. 4
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJQqUIQAONno189113[{q,1310'10unu1uuf‘mmm,l:duu11101;pepBOIHMOG
`
`
`
`
`
`A “1’
`E
`111
`r“
`E W 1
`3;:
`g
`"r:
`5:»
`2
`'
`S?a“: m <
`(21
`Ta‘
`331
`.
`E}
`,
`J
`«f
`2E1
`<
`
`a
`
`111
`
`_,
`
`a c;
`
`B M
`M
`4"
`a: w
`12‘ $0
`as
`'
`it
`E w
`1:.
`2 w
`LE
`:3 29
`E1211
`:1;
`
`W a
`
`9r
`I"?
`
`if
`
`1"”!
`
`
`._ .. , Mmmo M
`Tomimdls Marrmyumgwp rmmmmm [yinpfluumfi Nm’mmhldx
`
`;
`
`[La 1.3%?!
`
`[ls-33H}
`
`
`FIGURE 2. Role of IL—11Ra in IL— 13—induced inflammation. A and B,
`
`
`
`
`
`The BAL cell recoveries of Tg/IL— 11Ra+l+ mice (
`), Tgi/IL— llRa’I’
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mice (E33513), Tg+/IL— llRa Jr” mice (I), and Tg+/IL— llRa 7” mice
`) at
`2 (A) and 4 (B) mo of age are compared. The histologic elfects1n 4—mo—old
`mice are illustrated in C (original magnification, X10). *, p < 0.01.
`
`
`
`a
`1
`3
`i
`
`i
`
`1"]
`
`W
`{‘1
`
`I
`
`. _-nm...z .,.......—..,.....I
`......
`l 1
`imam“ memm gamma-mm Lyauwm-m Nemmpmx
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 4
`
`

`

`2308
`
`IL—ll AND PATHOGENESIS OF E—13 PHENOTYPE
`
`A
`(761,041.43:
`{lg-Ilka:
`MCFvi
`MERZ
`
`w
`+i+
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`«+-
`
`4.
`.4.
`
`*‘k
`
`
`MCI”m mm
`Mipam
`
`Miprifi
`
`my»;
`
`Minder
`
`
`
`
`
`
`am
`.
`_
`n
`hafnium-2
`TARC
`
`(I
`CUM—HA3:
`[L- l l Ra;
`
`—
`+13;-
`
`—
`“g'm
`
`+
`Hwy
`
`+
`.4,“
`
`
`
`
`
`FIGURE 3. Role of IL—11Ra in
`IL—13—induced chemokine stimula—
`tion. A, Comparison of the levels of
`_
`mRNA encodlng the noted chemo—
`kines in lungs from Tg’ and Tgir
`mice with +/+ and —/— IL—11Ra
`loci.
`B—D, Levels
`of MCP—l,
`MIP—la, and eotaxin protein were as—
`
`sessed by ELISA in BAL fluids from
`
`
`
`2—mo—old
`(E33513)
`and 4—mo—old (I)
`mice. The evaluations in A are repre—
`sentative of four similar evaluations.
`B—D, Each value is the mean : SEM
`of evaluations in a minimum of five
`
`mice. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
`
`
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJounvoNno189113[{q/§10'[0Immw[[‘mmM//zch1q11101;popnommoq
`
`25m
`
`* l
`
`l
`
`9: l—"m’l
`
`l
`
`l
`
`E 2mm
`Ba
`
`E5
`
`1501';
`
`E11
`5';
`:3 mm
`
`500
`
`1 n
`
`
`
`’f
`'
`
`L‘CllML-IS:
`Iii—l “la:
`

`+l+
`
`t-
`19‘—
`
`+
`.m.
`
`+
`of.
`
`C W)
`
`:54}
`
`:5"
`a 2m)
`3:’35
`..
`E 130
`Int)
`
`50
`
`n
`01:10“.le
`[1,—2 um:
`
`w
`44+
`
`m
`.1.
`
`IL—llRa—dependent, because the levels of mRNA encoding TGF—
`61, +32, and 433 and MMP—9 and the production and activation of
`TGF— [31 were significantly decreased in E—llRa—null mutant mice
`(Fig. 5). Thus, HIE stimulates and activates TGF—Bl and induces
`production of the TGF—Bl activator, MMP—9, via an IL—l 1Ra—de—
`pendent mechanism.
`
`Role of IL—IlRa in IL—I3—induced alveolar remodeling
`
`To define the role(s) of E—llRa in the pathogenesis of IL—13—
`induced alveolar remodeling, we compared the alterations in lung
`volume and alveolar size in IL—13 Tg+ mice with WT and null
`E—llRa loci. In accord with previous observations (13), HIE
`caused an impressive increase in these parameters in lungs from
`mice with WT E—llRa loci (Fig. 6, A and B). In contrast, these
`eifects of HIE were significantly diminished in mice with null
`E—llRa loci (Fig. 6, A and B). Thus, E—llRa plays a key role in
`this remodeling response.
`
`Efiects of IL—IlRa deficiency on lung proteases
`
`To determine whether a deficiency of IL—1 1Ra could modulate the
`HIE—induced alveolar phenotype by decreasing the production of
`respiratory proteases, we compared the levels of mRNA encoding
`lung—relevant MMPs and cathepsins in WT and HJ—llRoF/T mice.
`As noted above (Fig. 5A), HIE is a potent stimulator of MMP—9,
`and this inductive event was mediated via an IL—l 1Ra—dependent
`pathway. As shown in Fig. 6C, HIE was also a potent stimulator
`of MMP—2, MMP—12, tissue inhibitor of MMP (Timp)—1, Timp—Z,
`Timp—3, Timp—4, cathepsin K, cathepsin S, cathepsin B, and ca—
`thepsin L.
`Interestingly,
`the induction of MMP—2, MMP—12,
`
`Timp—l to —4, cathepsin K, and cathepsin B was decreased in the
`absence of IL—11Ra (Fig. 6C). Thus, in the setting of a deficiency
`of IL—1 1Ra, IL—13 is unable to optimally stimulate lung proteases.
`
`Role of IL—IlRa in IL—I3—induced mucus metaplasia
`Studies were next undertaken to determine whether E—llRa
`
`played an important role in the pathogenesis of HIE—induced mu—
`cus metaplasia. In these studies we compared mucin gene expres—
`sion in Tg+ mice with WT and null IL—l 1Ra loci. The expression
`of gob—5, a calcium—activated chloride channel involved in the mu—
`cus response (38), was also evaluated. In lungs from Tg’ mice
`with WT or null E—llRa loci, the levels of expression of Muc—5 ac
`and gob—5 were at or near the limits of detection in our assay (Fig.
`7). In contrast,
`IL—13 was a potent stimulator of muc—SAC and
`gob—5 in murine lung (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the stimulation of
`muc5AC and gob—5 gene expression were diminished in Tg+ mice
`with null mutant E—llRa loci (Fig. 7). These studies demonstrate
`that HIM plays an important role in the pathogenesis of HIE
`stimulation of mucin and gob—5 gene expression.
`
`Role of IL—IlRa in IL—I3—induced respiratory death
`
`In CClO—E—l3 Tg+ mice, progressive lung pathology is noted. As
`a result, these mice die prematurely from a fibrodestructive,
`in—
`flammatory alveolar filling process that abrogates normal respira—
`tory function (12). To define the role of E—llRa in this fatal
`response, we compared the survival of HIE Tg+ mice with WT
`and null E—llRa loci. Tg+ mice with IL—llRozH+ loci started to
`die at ~ 100 days of age, and 100% of these animals were dead by
`4.1 mo of age (Fig. 8). As shown in Fig. 8, a deficiency of E—llRa
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. 5
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`{EthnicareaasTamiam:{9&1}:6? :3
`
`I)
`
`
`W
`
`2309
`
`w
`
`—
`4—
`
`+
`m
`
`v
`1:.
`
`(Tanager:C‘antmmLungmg
`
`
`
`B mm;
`1,2501]
`{MIG
`3m
`6m
`$110
`2m
`11
`—
`{1310.11.43
`1m um: m
`
`The Journal of Immunology
`
`FIGURE 4. Role of IL—11Ra in IL—13—induced fibro—
`sis and HA and myofibroblast accumulation. The colla—
`gen content of lungs from 4—mo—old IL—13 Tg’ and Tg+
`mice with +/+ and —/— IL—11Ra loci were compared
`using Picosirius Red (A) and Sirchol (B) collagen eval—
`uations. C, HA content of BAL fluids from Tg’ and
`Tgir mice with WT and null IL—11Ra loci. D, Compar—
`ison of a—smooth muscle actin staining of lungs from
`
`4—mo—old IL—13 Tg+ mice with +/+ and —/— IL—11Ra
`loci. A—C, Each value represents the mean : SEM of
`evaluations in a minimum of five mice. D, Representa—
`tive of four similar evaluations. *, p < 0.05; **, p <
`0.01. N.D., none detected.
`
`Hawaii:
`
`+5;
`
`-5-
`
`m.
`
`4-
`
`Camry:
`
`A 3mm;
`E 2506:
`EB 200a;
`g 1509;
`
`
`
`(SCI!)
`mum:
`
`.
`
`we
`
`IL—Hra (um;
`
`Ilwl Ira, Hm]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJQqUIQAONno189113[{q/310'[0untuu11[‘MAA//zd11q11101;pepBOIHMOG
`
`significantly improved the survival of these animals, with Tg+/IL—
`llRoF/T animals beginning to die at ~55 mo of age and many
`animals living to 7.8 mo of age (Fig. 8). Thus, E—llRa plays a
`critical role in the pathogenesis of the HIE—induced pathologies
`that lead to the death of these animals.
`
`Role of IL—IIRa in IL—I3—indnced protection in 100% 02
`
`Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that HIE con—
`fers an impressive level of cytoprotection in the context of hyper—
`oxia—induced acute lung injury (19). To define the role of E—llRa
`in this protective response, we compared the survival of Tg+ and
`Tg’ mice with WT and null E—llRa loci in 100% 02. WT mice
`died after 4—6 days of exposure to 100% 02 (Fig. 9). Interestingly,
`HJ—llRa’/’ mice were more susceptible to 100% 02 than their
`WT littermate controls, dying after 2—3 days of exposure to 100%
`02. As described previously (36), IL—13 Tg+ mice with WT Hf
`llRa loci lived for an extended interval, with many of these an—
`imals living for 8—12 days in hyperoxia (Fig. 9). Interestingly, a
`deficiency of E—llRa did not significantly alter this protective
`response (Fig. 9). Together,
`these studies demonstrate that IL—
`11Ra plays an important role in regulating the response of other—
`wise normal mice to hyperoxia. They also demonstrate that IL—
`11Ra does not play a significant role in the cytoprotection that is
`conferred by IL—13.
`
`Efiect of IL—IIRa deficiency on IL—13 production and receptor
`expression
`
`A deficiency of E—llRa could modify the HIE—induced pheno—
`type by altering IL—13 production or the expression of the subunits
`that make up the E—13R. To address the former, we compared the
`levels of IL—13 in BAL from Tg+ mice with WT and null E—llRa
`loci. As shown in Fig. 10A, a deficiency of E—llRa did not alter
`the levels of transgenic HIE protein. To address the receptor is—
`sue, we compared the levels of expression of IL—4Ra and HI
`13Ra1, which make up the signaling E—13R complex, and the
`decoy receptor E—13Ra2 in mice with WT and null IL—l 1Ra loci.
`The levels of mRNA encoding IL—4Ra, IL—l3Ra1, and IL—13 R012
`in Tg’ mice with WT and null IL—l 1Ra loci were comparable and
`
`were at or below the limits of detection of our assays (Fig. 103).
`As previously reported (39), HIE was a potent stimulator of each
`of these moieties (Fig. 103). In these experiments a deficiency of
`E—llRa caused only modest alterations in the levels of expression
`of IL—4Ra and IL—13Ra1 (Fig. 103). Importantly, in the absence of
`E—llRa,
`the levels of expression of IL—13Ra2 were not aug—
`mented (Fig. 103). In fact, modest decreases in the levels of ex—
`pression of this decoy receptor were noted. These studies demon—
`strate that the amelioration of the HIE phenotype that is seen in
`E—llRa—null mice is not due to a decrease in HIE production, a
`decrease in IL—13Ra1—IL—4Ra receptor expression, or an increase
`in expression of the E—13Ra2 decoy receptor.
`
`Discussion
`Because HIE and HIM are juxtaposed in inflammatory tissues,
`studies were undertaken to define the relationship(s) between these
`
`important regulatory moieties. These studies de
`that
`IL—13 is potent stimulator of IL—11 and IL—1 1Ra
`L
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lastly they demonstrate that IL—13 is unable to optimally stimulate
`inflammatory chemokines, proteases, and mucin genes and is un—
`able to fully stimulate and activate TGF—Bl in the absence of Ur
`llRa. These studies define a previously unappreciated mechanism
`of regulation of IL—11 and E—llRa. Because IL—11 is the only
`known ligand for the E—llRa—gpl30 receptor complex,
`these
`studies also define
`
`
` 1n the pathogenes1s of HIE—induced
`tissue responses.
`IL—11 was discovered as an E—6—like molecule that stimulated
`
`
`
`the proliferation of E—6—dependent plasmacytoma cells (40). Sub—
`sequent investigation has focused to a great extent on the eifects of
`exogenously administered rIL—ll and its role as a potential ther—
`apeutic agent. These studies highlighted impressive eifects of
`IL—11 on platelets, which is the basis for the approval of IL—11 by
`the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a treatment that fosters
`
`Lassen — Exhibit 1007, p. 6
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1007, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`“oz‘zJounvoNno189113[{q,1310'[ounmuuf'mmw/zduq11101;popnommoq
`
`2310
`
`IL—11 AND PATHOGENESIS OF E—13 PHENOTYPE
`
`A {TCIOJL‘Hz
`12»! mm:
`
`-
`inf-b
`
`-
`-f~«
`
`+
`+74»
`
`+
`“1.,
`
`A
`
`1*:
`E.
`
`NE3.
`
`1:g?
`9;“
`'5J
`
`TGIF» {’21
`
`T6541 {12
`
`TGF~ 1'33
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3m; I) H
`
`C(Tlilwflmlfit
`“Ania;
`
`—
`44+
`
`—
`4»
`
`+
`+359
`
`+
`~i~
`
`(“J
`
`
`
`TamiTGF»fil(pg;’mt}
`
`W33
`mm
`
`4%}
`
`3436i}
`
`2901}
`
`“3W
`
`94
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C(“Iflv-lLXJ:
`IL- ” Ru;
`
`.
`+e'+
`
`.,.
`—i—
`
`1h
`+f+
`
`E
`
`
`
`6“
`—l—
`
`FIGURE 5. Role of IL—llRa in lL—13 stimulation of TGF—B moieties and
`MMP—9. Lungs were obtained from Tg’ and TgJr mice with +/+ and —/—
`IL—llRa loci. The levels of mRNA encoding TGF—B moieties and MMP—9
`were assessed by RT—PCR (A), and the levels of bioactive (B) and total (C)
`TGF—Bl were evaluated by ELISA. A, Representative of four similar eval—
`
`uations. B and C, Values represent the mean : SEM of evaluation in a
`
`
`
`minimum of five mice that were either 2 (E33513) or 4 (I) mo of age.
`
`platelet reconstitution after bone marrow ablative therapy (17, 18).
`They also defined the ability of recombinant and transgenic HIM
`to confer cytoprotection and inhibit inflammation during states of
`mucosal/tissue injury (27, 28, 33, 41—43). These studies did not,
`however, address in detail the roles of endogenous HIM and HIM
`signaling in the generation of tissue inflammatory and extraosse—
`ous remodeling responses. The present studies provide a new level
`of insight into the biology of IL—11 by demonstrating that in ad—
`dition to the protective eflects of high concentrations of exogenous
`IL—11, endogenous HIM has important proinflammatory eflects at
`sites of HIE—mediated tissue inflammation. In the absence of
`
`IL—11 signaling, the ability of IL—13 to induce lymphocytic and
`eosinophilic tissue inflammation was markedly diminished. In ac—
`cord with these findings, in the absence of E—llRa, IL—13 was
`also unable to optimally stimulate the production of the proinflam—
`matory chemokines
`(MCP—l/CCL—Z, MCP—Z/CCLS, MCP—3/
`CCL7, MIP—la/CCL3, MIP—lB/CCIA, MIP—

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket