throbber

`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`CHARLES A JANEWAY«»«PAUL TRAVERS
`
`i
`
`1FrWeSha
`
`Ps
`
`7 - a * " " a b t
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`Immuno
`iologye
`
`THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`Charles A. Janeway, Jr.
`
`Yale University School of Medicine
`G
`Paul Travers
`
`Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London
`&
`Mark Walport
`
`Imperial College School of Medicine, London
`on)
`Mark J. Shlomchik
`
`Yale University School of Medicine
`
`Sots
`
`4<o
`
`
`
`a*
`
`
`<o
`Op
`a
`& Franci®
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 2
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 2
`
`

`

`Vice President:
`Text Editors:
`Managing Editor:
`Editorial Assistant:
`Managing Production Editor:
`Production Assistant:
`New Media Editor:
`Copyeditor:
`Indexer:
`Illustration and Layout:
`Manufacturing:
`
`Denise Schanck
`Penelope Austin, Eleanor Lawrence
`Sarah Gibbs
`Mark Ditzel
`Emma Hunt
`Angeia Bennett
`Michael Morales
`Len Cegielka
`Liza Furnival
`Blink Studio, London
`Marion Morrow, Rory MacDonald
`
`© 2001 by Garland Publishing.
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval
`system or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
`recording, or otherwise—withoutthe prior written permission of the copyright holder.
`
`Distributors:
`Inside North America: Garland Publishing, 29 West 35th Street,
`New York, NY 10001-2299.
`Inside Japam Nankodo Co.Ltd., 42-6, Hongo 3-Chrome, Bunkyo-ku,
`Tokyo, 113-8410, Japan.
`Outside North America and Japan: Churchill Livingstone, Robert Stevenson House,
`1-3 Baxter's Place, Leith Walk, Edinburgh, EH1 3AF.
`
`ISBN 0 8153 3642 X (paperback) Garland
`ISBN 0 4430 7098 9 (paperback) Churchill Livingstone
`ISBN 0 4430 7099 7 (paperback)International Student Edition
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`Immunobiolegy : the immune system in health and disease / Charles A, Janeway, dr....
`[et al.].-- 5th ed.
`p. cm.
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-8153-3642-X (pbk.)
`1. Immunology. 2. Immunity. |. Janeway, Charles. ||. Title.
`
`QRi81 1454 2001
`616.07'9--de21
`
`2001016039
`
`This book was produced using QuarkXpress 4.11 and Adobe Illustrator 9.0
`
`Published by Gariand Publishing, a memberof the Taylor & Francis Group,
`29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001-2299.
`
`Printed in the United States of America.
`15 1413 1211109876543 2
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 3
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Oo2©}Oo©=SSSso>©»©57oUtmoOo==os=oBo0o®2oa5==afwmp
`
`Basic Concepts in Immunology
`
`Innate Immunity
`
`Antigen Recognition by B-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`The Generation of Lymphocyte Antigen Receptors
`Antigen Presentation to T Lymphocytes
`
`Index
`
`Afterword Evolution of the Immune System:Past, Present, and Future,
`by Charles A. Janeway, dr.
`
`PART!|AN INTRODUCTION TO IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND INNATE IMMUNITY
`
`PART Il|THE RECOGNITION OF ANTIGEN
`
`PARTfll|THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATURE LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR
`REPERTOIRES
`
`Chapter 6—Signaling Through Immune System Receptors
`QO=DosSsa a N
`
`The Development and Survival of Lymphocytes
`
`PART IV|THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSE
`
`Chapter8
`
`—T Cell-Mediated Immunity
`
`Chapter9
`
`The Humoral Immune Response
`
`Chapter 10 Adaptive Immunity to Infection
`
`PART V|THE IMMUNE SYSTEM IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Failures of Host Defense Mechanisms
`
`Chapter 12 Allergy and Hypersensitivity
`
`Chapter 13 Autoimmunity and Transplantation
`
`Chapter 14 Manipulation of the Immune Response
`
`Appendix!
`
`Immunologists’ Toolbox
`
`Appendix Il CD Antigens
`
`AppendixIll Cytokines and their Receptors
`
`Appendix IV Chemokines andtheir Receptors
`
`Appendix V_
`
`Immunological Constants
`
`Biographies
`
`Glossary
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 4
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 4
`
`

`

`THE RECOGNITION
`
`OF ANTIGEN
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 5
`
` |
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 5
`
`

`

`“=
`
`Antigen Recognition by B-cell
`and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`
`
`Wehave learned in Chapter 2 that the body is defended by innate immune
`responses, but these will only work to control pathogens that have certain
`molecular patterns or that induce interferons and other secreted yet non-
`specific defenses. Mostcrucially, they do not allow memory to form as they
`operate by receptors that are coded in the genome. Thus,innate immunity is
`good for preventing pathogens from growingfreely in the body, but it does
`not lead to the most importantfeature of adaptive immunity, which is long-
`lasting memory ofspecific pathogen.
`To recognize and fight
`the wide range of pathogens an individual will
`encounter, the lymphocytes of the adaptive immunesystem have evolved to
`recognize a great variety of different antigens from bacteria, viruses, and
`other disease-causing organisms. The antigen-recognition molecules of B
`cells are the immunoglobulins,or Ig. These proteins are produced by B cells
`in a vast range of antigen specificities, each B cell producing immunoglobulin
`of a single specificity (see Sections 1-8 to 1-10). Membrane-bound
`immunoglobulin on the B-cell surface serves as the cell’s receptor for anti-
`gen, and is known asthe B-cell receptor (BCR). Immunoglobulin of the same
`antigen specificity is secreted as antibody by terminally differentiated B
`cells—the plasmacells. The secretion of antibodies, which bind pathogensor
`their toxic products in the extracellular spacesof the body, is the main effector
`functionofB cells in adaptive immunity.
`
`Antibodies werethefirst molecules involved in specific immunerecognition to
`be characterized and arestill the best understood. The antibody molecule has
`two separate functions: one is to bind specifically to molecules from the
`pathogen that elicited the immune response; the otheris to recruit other cells
`and molecules to destroy the pathogen once the antibody is boundtoit. For
`example, binding by antibody neutralizes viruses and marks pathogens for
`destruction by phagocytes and complement, as described in Section 1-14.
`These functions are structurally separated in the antibody molecule, one part
`of which specifically recognizes and binds to the pathogen or antigen whereas
`the other engages different effector mechanisms. The antigen-binding region
`varies extensively between antibody molecules and is thus known as the
`variable region or V region, The variability of antibody molecules allows each
`antibody to bind a different specific antigen, and the total repertoire of anti-
`bodies madeby a single individual is large enough to ensure that virtually any
`structure can be recognized. The region ofthe antibody molecule that engages
`theeffector functions of the immunesystem does notvary in the same way and
`is thus knownas the constant regionor C region.It comes in five main forms,
`which are each specialized for activating different effector mechanisms. The
`membrane-bound B-cell receptor does not have these effector functions, as
`the C region remains inserted in the membraneoftheBcell. Its function is as
`a receptor that recognizes and binds antigen by the V regions exposed on
`the surface of the cell, thus transmitting a signal that causes B-cell activation
`leading to clonal expansion andspecific antibody production.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 6
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`94
`
`Chapter 3; Antigen Recognition by 8-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`
`
`The antigen-recognition molecules of T cells are made solely as membrane-
`bound proteins and only function to signal T cells for activation. These
`T-cell receptors (TCRs) are related to immunoglobulins bothin their protein
`structure—having both V and C regions—andin the genetic mechanism that
`produces their great variability (see Section 1-10 and Chapter 4). However,
`the T-cell receptor differs from the B-cell receptor in an important way:
`it does not recognize and bind antigen directly, but instead recognizes short
`peptide fragments of pathogen protein antigens, which are bound to MHC
`molecules on the surfaces of other cells.
`
`The MHC molecules are glycoproteins encodedin the large cluster of genes
`known as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)(see Sections 1-16
`and 1-17). Their most striking structural feature is a cleft running across
`their outermost surface, in which a variety of peptides can be bound. As we
`shall discuss further in Chapter 5, MHC molecules showgreat genetic varia-
`tion in the population, and each individual carries up to 12 of the possible
`variants, which increases the range of pathogen-derived peptides that can
`be bound. T-cell receptors recognize features both of the peptide antigen
`and of the MHC molecule to which it is bound. This introduces an extra
`dimension to antigen recognition by T cells, known as MHCrestriction,
`because any given T-cell receptoris specific not simply for a foreign peptide
`antigen, but for a unique combination of a peptide and a particular MHC
`molecule. The ability of T-cell receptors to recognize MHC molecules, and
`their selection during T-cell developmentfor the ability to recognize the
`particular MHC molecules expressed by an individual, are topics we shall
`return to in Chapters 5 and 7.
`
`In this chapter we focus on the structure and antigen-binding properties of
`immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors. Although B cells and T cells recognize
`foreign molecules in two distinct fashions, the receptor molecules they use
`for this task are very similar in structure. Wewill see howthis basic structure
`can accommodate great variability in antigen specificity, and how it enables
`immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors to carry out their functions as the
`antigen-recognition moleculesof the adaptive immuneresponse.
`
`Thestructure of a typicalantibodymolecule.
`
`Antibodies are the secreted form ofthe B-cell receptor. An antibodyis identical
`to the B-cell receptorof the cell that secretes it except for a small portion of
`the C-terminus of the heavy-chain constant region, In the case of the B-cell
`receptor the C-terminus is a hydrophobic membrane-anchoring sequence,
`andin the case of antibodyit is a hydrophilic sequence that allows secretion.
`Since they are soluble, and secreted in large quantities, antibodies are easily
`obtainable and easily studied. For this reason, most of what we know about
`the B-cell receptor comes from the study of antibodies.
`
`Antibody molecules are roughly Y-shaped molecules consisting of three
`equal-sized portions, loosely connected bya flexible tether. Three schematic
`representations of antibody structure, which has been determined by X-ray
`crystallography, are shown in Fig. 3.1. The aim ofthis part of the chapteris to
`explain howthis structure is formed and howit allows antibody molecules to
`carry out their dual tasks—binding on the one handto a widevariety of anti-
`gens, and on the other handto a limited number of effector molecules and
`cells. As we will see, each of these tasks is carried out by separable parts of the
`molecule. The two armsofthe Y end in regions that vary between different
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 7
`
`N terminus
`
`Variable
`
`region
`
`
`
`Constant
`fegion
`
`
`
`C terminus
`
`
`Fig. 3.1 Structure of an antibody
`molecule. Panela Illustrates a
`ribbon diagram based on the X-ray
`crystallographic structure of an IgG
`antibody, showing the course of the
`backbones of the polypeptide chains.
`Three globular regions form a Y. The
`two antigen-binding sites are at thetips
`of the arms, which are tethered to the
`trunk of the Y by a flexible hinge region.
`A schematic representation of the
`structure in a is given in panel b,
`illustrating the four-chain composition
`and the separate domains comprising
`each chain. Panel c shows a simplified
`schematic representation of an antibody
`molecule that will be used throughout
`this book. Photograph courtesy of
`A. McPherson and L. Harris.
`
`r
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 7
`
`

`

`The structure of a typical antibody molecule
`
`antibody molecules, the V regions. These are involved in antigen binding,
`whereas the stem ofthe Y,or the C region,is far less variable andis the part
`that interacts with effector cells and molecules.
`
`All antibodies are constructed in the same way from paired heavy andlight
`polypeptide chains, and the generic term immunoglobulinis used forall such
`proteins. Within this general category, however, five different classes of
`immunoglobulins—IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE—can be distinguished by
`their C regions, which will be described more fully in Chapter 4. More subtle
`differences confined to the V region accountfor the specificity of antigen
`binding. Wewill use the IgG antibody molecule as an example to describe the
`general structural features of immunoglobulins.
`
`3-1
`
`IgG antibodies consistof four polypeptide chains.
`
`IgG antibodies are large molecules, having a molecular weight of approximately
`150 kDa, composed of two different kinds of polypeptide chain. One, of
`approximately 50 kDa, is termed the heavy or H chain, and the other, of 25
`kDa, is termed thelight or L chain (Fig. 3.2). Each IgG molecule consists of
`two heavy chains and twolight chains, The two heavy chains are linked to
`each other by disulfide bonds and each heavy chainis linked to a light chain
`by a disulfide bond. In any given immunoglobulin molecule, the two heavy
`chains and the twolight chains are identical, giving an antibody molecule
`two identical antigen-bindingsites (see Fig. 3.1), and thus theability to bind
`simultaneously to twoidentical structures.
`Two types of light chain, termed lambda(A) and kappa(x), are foundin anti-
`bodies. A given immunoglobulin either has « chains or A chains, never one of
`each. No functional difference has been found between antibodies having i
`or « light chains, and eithertypeoflight chain may be found in antibodies of
`any of the five major classes. The ratio of the two types oflight chain varies
`from species to species. In mice, the average x to A ratio is 20:1, whereas in
`humans it
`is 2:1 and in cattle it is 1:20, The reason for this variation
`is unknown. Distortions of this ratio can sometimes be used to detect
`the abnormalproliferation of a clone of B cells. These would all express the
`identical light chain, and thus an excess of ) light chains in a person might
`indicate the presenceofa B-cell tumor producing A chains.
`
`;
`|
`
`1
`|
`
`|
`
`By contrast,the class, and thusthe effector function, ofan antibody,is defined
`by the structure ofits heavy chain. There are five main heavy-chain classes or
`isotypes, some of which have several subtypes, and these determine the func-
`tional activity ofan antibody molecule.Thefive major classes ofimmunoglob-
`ulin are immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin D (IgD), immunoglobulin
`G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin E (IgE). Their heavy
`chains are denoted by the corresponding lower-case Greekletter (p, 6, y, @,
`and €, respectively). lgG is by far the most abundant immunoglobulin and has
`several subclasses (IgGl, 2, 3, and 4 in humans). Theirdistinctive functional
`Properties are conferred by the carboxy-terminal part of the heavy chain,
`whereit is not associated with the light chain. We will describe the structure
`and functionsof the different heavy-chain isotypes in Chapter4, The general
`Structural featuresofall the isotypes are similar and wewill consider IgG,the
`Most abundantisotypein plasma, as a typical antibody molecule.
`
`UP of two heavy chains (green) and two
`
`Fig. 3.2 immunoglobulin molecules
`are composed of two types of protein
`Chain: heavy chains and light chains.
`'mmunoglobulin molecule is made
`
`light chains (yellow) joined by disulfide
`bonds so that each heavy chain is linked
`to a light chain and the two heavy chains
`are linked together.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 8
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Chapter 3: Antigen Recognition by B-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`3-2.
`
`Immunoglobulin heavy and light chains are composed of constant
`and variable regions.
`
`The amino acid sequences of many immunoglobulin heavy andlight chains
`have been determined and reveal two important features of antibody mole-
`cules. First, each chain consists of a series of similar, although not identical,
`sequences, each about 110 amino acids long. Each of these repeats corre-
`spondsto a discrete, compactly folded region of protein structure known as
`a protein domain. Thelight chain is made up of two such immunoglobulin
`domains, whereasthe heavy chain ofthe IgG antibody containsfour(see Fig,
`3.1a). This suggests that the immunoglobulin chains have evolved by repeated
`duplication of an ancestral gene correspondingto a single domain.
`
`The second important feature revealed by comparisons of amino acid
`sequencesis that the amino-terminal sequences of both the heavy andlight
`chains vary greatly between different antibodies. The variability in sequence
`is limited to approximately the first 110 amino acids, corresponding to the
`first domain, whereas the remaining domains are constant between
`immunoglobulin chains of the same isotype. The amino-terminal variable or
`V domainsof the heavy andlight chains (Vq and V,, respectively) together
`make up the V region of the antibody and confer onit the ability to bind
`specific antigen, while the constant domains (C domains) of the heavy and
`light chains (Cy and C;, respectively) make up the C region (see Fig. 3.1b, c).
`The multiple heavy-chain C domains are numbered from the amino-terminal
`end to the carboxy terminus, for example Cj;1, Cy2, and so on.
`
`3-3.
`
`The antibody molecule can readily be cleaved into functionally
`distinct fragments.
`
`The protein domains described above associate to form larger globular
`domains, Thus, when fully folded and assembled, an antibody molecule
`comprises three equal-sized globular portions joined by a flexible stretch of
`polypeptide chain known asthe hingeregion (see Fig. 3.1b). Each arm ofthis
`Y-shaped structure is formed by the association of a light chain with the
`amino-terminal half of a heavy chain, whereasthe trunk ofthe Y is formed by
`the pairing of the carboxy-terminal halves of the two heavy chains. The asso-
`ciation of the heavy andlight chains is such that the Vj; and V,, domains are
`paired, as are the Cy1 and C;, domains. The Cy3 domainspair with each other
`but the Cy2 domains do notinteract; carbohydrate side chains attached to
`the Cy2 domainslie between the two heavy chains. The two antigen-binding
`sites are formed by the paired Vy and V;, domains atthe ends of the two arms
`of the Y (see Fig. 3.1b).
`
`Proteolytic enzymes (proteases) that cleave polypeptide sequences have been
`used to dissect the structure of antibody molecules and to determine which
`parts of the molecule are responsible forits various functions. Limiteddigestion
`with the protease papain cleaves antibody molecules into three fragments
`(Fig. 3.3). Two fragments are identical and contain the antigen-binding activity.
`These are termed the Fab fragments, for Fragment antigen binding, The Fab
`fragments correspond to the two identical arms of the antibody molecule,
`which contain the completelight chains paired with the Vj, and C,1 domains
`of the heavy chains. The other fragment contains no antigen-bindingactivity
`but was originally observed to crystallize readily, and for this reason was
`named the Fc fragment, for Fragment crystallizable. This fragment corre-
`spondsto the paired ©);2 and C3 domainsandis the part of the antibody
`molecule that interacts with effector molecules and cells. The functional
`differences between heavy-chain isotypes lie mainly in the Fc fragment.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 9
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 9
`
`

`

`
`
`The structure of a typical antibody molecule
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.3 The Y-shaped immunoglobu-
`lin molecule can be dissected by
`partial digestion with proteases.
`
`Papain cleaves the immunoglobulin
`
`molecule into three pieces, two Fab
`
`fragments and one Fc fragment (upper
`
`panels). The Fab fragment contains the
`
`V regions and binds antigen. The Fc
`
`fragmentis crystallizable and contains C
`
`regions, Pepsin cleaves immunoglobulin
`
`to yield one F(ab’)s fragment and many
`
`small piecesof the Fe fragment, the
`
`largest of whichis called the pFc’ frag-
`
`ment (lower panels). F(ab’)is written
`
`with a prime becauseit contains a few
`
`more amino acids than Fab, including
`
`the cysteines that form the disulfide
`bonds.
`
`
`
`
`!
`
`|
`|
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`The protein fragments obtained afterproteolysis are determined bywhere the
`protease cuts the antibody moleculein relationto the disulfide bonds thatlink
`the two heavy chains. These lie in the hinge region between the Cy] and Cq2
`
`domains and,as illustrated in Fig. 3.3, papain cleaves the antibody molecule
`on the amino-terminal sideof the disulfide bonds. This releases the two arms
`
`of the antibody as separate Fab fragments, whereas in the Fe fragment the
`
`carboxy-terminal halves of the heavy chains remain linked.
`
`
`Another protease, pepsin, cuts in the same general region of the antibody
`molecule as papain but on the carboxy-terminal side of the disulfide bonds
`
`(see Fig. 3.3). This produces a fragment, the F(ab’)2 fragment,in which the
`
`two antigen-binding arms of the antibody molecule remain linked. In this
`
`case the remainingpart ofthe heavy chainis cut into several small fragments.
`
`The F(ab’), fragment has exactly the same antigen-binding characteristics as
`
`the original antibody but is unable to interact with any effector molecule.It is
`
`thus of potential value in therapeutic applications of antibodies as well as in
`
`Tesearch into the functional role ofthe Fc portion.
`
`Genetic engineering techniques also now permit the construction of many
`
`different antibody-related molecules. One importanttypeis a truncated Fab
`
`Comprising only the V domain of a heavy chain linked by a stretch of
`
`synthetic peptide to a V domain ofalight chain. This is called single-chain Fv,
`
`named from Fragmentvariable. Fv molecules may becomevaluable thera-
`
`Peutic agents because of their small size, which allows them to penetrate
`
`tissues readily, They can be coupled to protein toxins to yield immunotoxins
`with potential application, for example, in tumor therapy in the case of a Fy
`Specific for a tumor antigen (see Chapter14).
`
`
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 10
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 10
`
`

`

`
`
`Chapter 3; Antigen Recognition by B-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`3-4 = molecule is flexible, especially atthe hinge
`
`n
`
`The hinge region that links the Fe and Fab portions of the antibody molecule
`is in reality a flexible tether, allowing independent movementof the two Fab
`arms, rather than a rigid hinge. This has been demonstrated by electron
`microscopy of antibodies bound to haptens. These are small molecules of
`various sorts, typically about the size of a tyrosine side chain. They can be
`recognized by antibody but are only able to stimulate production of anti-
`hapten antibodies when linked to a larger protein carrier (see Appendix |,
`Section A-1). An antigen madeof two identical hapten molecules joined by a
`short flexible region can link two or more anti-hapten antibodies, forming
`dimers, trimers, tetramers, and so on, which can be seen by electron
`microscopy (Fig. 3.4), The shapes formed by these complexes demonstrate
`that antibody molecules are flexible at the hinge region, Someflexibility is
`also found at the junction between the V and C domains, allowing bending
`and rotation of the V domain relative to the C domain. For example, in the
`antibody molecule shown in Fig. 3.1a, not only are the two hinge regions
`clearly bent differently, but the angle between the V and C domainsin each of
`the two Fab arms is also different. This range of motion has led to the junction
`between the V and C domains being referred to as a ‘molecular ball-
`and-socketjoint.’ Flexibility at both the hinge and V—C junction enables the
`binding of both arms of an antibody molecule to sites that are various
`distances apart, for example, sites on bacterial cell-wall polysaccharides.
`Flexibility at the hinge also enables the antibodies to interact with the
`antibody-binding proteins that mediate immuneeffector mechanisms.
`
` Angle between arms is 0° Angle between arms is 90°
`
`'
`
`Fig. 3.4 Antibody arms are joined by
`a flexible hinge. An antigen consisting
`of two hapten molecules (red balls in
`diagrams) that can cross-link two
`antigen-binding sites is used to create
`antigen:antibody complexes, which can
`be seen in the electron micrograph.
`Linear, triangular, and square forms are
`seen, with short projections or spikes.
`Limited pepsin digestion removes these
`spikes (not shown in the figure), which
`therefore correspond to the Fc portion of
`the antibody; the F(ab‘)z pieces remain
`cross-linked by antigen. The interpre-
`tation of the complexes is shown in the
`diagrams. The angle between the arms
`of the antibody molecules varies, from
`0°in the antibody dimers, through 60°
`in the triangular forms, to 90° in the
`square forms, showing that the
`connections between the arms are
`flexible. Photograph (x 300,000)
`courtesy of N.M. Green.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 11
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 11
`
`

`

`Thestructureofatypicalantibody molecule [
`
`
`4.5
`The domains of an immunoglobulin molecule have similar structures.
`
`‘As we saw in Section 3-2, immunoglobulin heavy and light chains are
`~omposed ofa series of discrete protein domains. These protein domainsall
`nave a similar folded structure. Within this basic three-dimensional struc-
`
`ture, there are distinct differences between V and C domains.The structural
`gimilarities and differences can be seen in the diagram ofa light chain in Fig.
`
`35. Fach domain is constructed from two B sheets, which are elements of
`protein structure made up of strands of the polypeptide chain (f strands)
`
`wacked together; the sheetsare linked by a disulfide bridge and together form
`aroughly barrel-shaped structure, known as a B barrel. The distinctive folded
`
`eructure of the immunoglobulin protein domain is known as the
`immunoglobulin fold.
`
`Both the essential similarity of V and C domains andthecritical difference
`‘between them are most clearly seen in the bottom panels of Fig. 3.5, where
`‘the cylindrical domains are opened outto reveal how the polypeptide chain
`
`folds to create each of the B sheets and howit forms flexible loops asit
`changes direction. The main difference between the V and C domains is that
`flexible loops of the V domains form the antigen-binding site of the
`the V domain is larger, with an extra loop. Wewill see in Section 3-6 that the
`
`immunoglobulin molecule.
`
`
`
`|
`
`|
`|
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.5 The structure of immuno-
`globulin constant and variable
`domains. The upper panels show
`schematically the folding pattern of the
`constant (C) and variable (V) domains
`of an immunoglobulin light chain. Each
`domain is a barrel-shaped structure in
`which strands of polypeptide chain
`(B strands) running in opposite directions
`(antiparallel) pack together to form two
`f sheets (shown in yellow and green in
`the diagram of the C domain), which are
`held together by a disulfide bond. The
`way the polypeptide chain folds to give
`the final structure can be seen more
`clearly when the sheets are opened
`out, as shownin the lower panels. The
`B strandsare lettered sequentially with
`respect to the order of their occurrence
`in the amino acid sequence of the
`domains; the order in each B sheet is
`characteristic of immunoglobulin
`domains. The B strands C’ and C”that
`are found in the V domains but not in
`the C domains are indicated by a blue
`shaded background. The characteristic
`four-strand plus three-strand (C-region
`type domain)or four-strand plusfive-
`strand (V-region type domain) arrange-
`ments are typical immunoglobulin
`superfamily domain building blocks,
`found in a whole range of other
`proteins as well as antibodies and
`T-cell receptors.
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 12
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Chapter 3: Antigen Recognition by B-cell and T-cell Receptors
`
`
`
`Manyofthe amino acids that are common to C and V domains of immuno.
`globulin chains lie in the core of the immunoglobulin fold and are critical to
`its stability. For that reason, other proteins having sequences similar to those
`of immunoglobulins are believed to form domains ofsimilar structure, and in
`many cases this has been demonstrated by crystallography. These
`immunoglobulin-like domains are present in many other proteins of the
`immune system, and in proteins involved in cell-cell recognition in the
`nervous system and other tissues. Together with the immunoglobulins and
`the T-cell receptors, they make up the extensive immunoglobulin superfamily,
`
`Summary.
`
`The IgG antibody molecule is made up of four polypeptide chains, comprising
`twoidentical light chains and twoidentical heavy chains, and can be thought
`of as forming a flexible Y-shaped structure. Each of the four chains has a
`variable (V) region at its amino terminus, which contributes to the antigen-
`binding site, and a constant (C) region, which determines the isotype. The
`isotype of the heavy chain determines the functional properties of the
`antibody, The light chains are bound to the heavy chains by many non-
`covalent interactions and by disulfide bonds, and the V regions of the heavy
`and light chains pair in each arm ofthe Y to generate two identical antigen-
`bindingsites, which lie at the tips of the arms of the Y. The possession of two
`antigen-bindingsites allows antibody molecules to cross-link antigens and to
`bind them much morestably. The trunk of the Y, or Fe fragment, is composed
`of the carboxy-terminal domainsof the heavy chains. Joining the armsof the
`Y to the trunk are the flexible hinge regions. The Fe fragment and hinge
`regions differ in antibodies of different isotypes,
`thus determining their
`functional properties. However, the overall organization of the domainsis
`similar in all isotypes.
`
`Theinteractionoftheantibodymoleculewith
`specificantigen.
`
`We have described the structure of the antibody molecule and how the V
`regions of the heavy and light chains fold and pair to formthe antigen-binding
`site. In this part of the chapterwewill look at the antigen-binding site in more
`detail. We will discuss the different ways in which antigens can bind to anti-
`body and address the question of how variation in the sequences of the
`antibody V domains determines the specificity for antigen.
`
`3-6
`
`Localized regions of hypervariable sequence form the antigen-
`bindingsite.
`
`The V regions of any given antibody moleculediffer from thoseof every other.
`Sequence variability is not, however, distributed evenly throughout the V
`regions but is concentrated in certain segmentsofthe V region. The distribution
`of variable aminoacids can be seen clearly in whatis termed a variability plot
`(Fig. 3.6), in which the amino acid sequences of many different antibody
`V regions are compared. Three segments of particular variability can be
`identified in both the V,; and V,, domains. They are designated hypervariable
`regions and are denoted HV1, HV2, and HV3.In the light chains these are
`roughly from residues 28 to 35, from 49 to 59, and from 92 to 103,respectively.
`
`
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 13
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 13
`
`

`

`The interaction of the antibody molecule with specific antigen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.6 There are discrete regions
`of hypervariability in V domains. A
`variability plot derived from comparison
`of the amino acid sequences of several
`dozen heavy-chain and light-chain V
`domains. At each amino acid position
`the degree of variability is the ratio of
`the numberof different amino acids
`seenin all of the sequences together
`to the frequency of the most common
`amino acid. Three hypervariable regions
`(HV1, HV2, and HV3) are indicated
`in red and are also knownas the
`complementarity-determining regions,
`CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3. They are
`flanked by less variable framework
`regions (FR1, FR2, FR3, and FR4,
`shownin blue or yellow).
`
`Lassen - Exhibit 1038, p. 14
`
`The most variable part of the domain is in the HV3 region. The regions
`between the hypervariable regions, which comprise the rest of the V domain,
`show less variability and are termed the framework regions. There are four
`such regions in each V domain, designated FR1, FR2, FR3, and FR4.
`
`The framework regions form the f sheets that provide the structural frame-
`work of the domain, whereas the hypervariable sequences correspond to
`three loops at the outer edge ofthe f barrel, which are juxtaposedin the folded
`domain (Fig. 3.7). Thus, not only is sequence diversity concentrated in
`particular parts of the V domainbutit is localized to a particular region on the
`surface of the molecule. When the Vj; and V;, domains are paired in the anti-
`body molecule, the hypervariable loops from each domain are brought
`together, creating a single hypervariable site at the tip of each arm of the
`molecule. This is the binding site for antigen, the antigen-binding site or
`antibody combiningsite. The three hypervariable loops determine antigen
`specificity by forming a surface complementary to the antigen, and are more
`commonly termed the comple

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket