throbber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 18-3632 (SDW)(CLW)
`
`
`
`PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`THIS MATTER having come before the Court for a scheduling conference pursuant to
`Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 11, 2019, and the parties having
`reviewed the Court’s Civil Case Management Order as well as the Local Civil Rules, and for
`good cause shown,
`
`IT IS on this day of _______________________,
`
`ORDERED THAT this matter will proceed as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Rule 26 Disclosures. The parties shall exchange disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 no later
`than [Plaintiff’s position: April 4, 20191; Defendant’s position: January 29, 20192].
`
`Contentions. Plaintiff shall identify asserted claims no later than [Plaintiff’s position:
`April 4, 2019; Defendant’s position: February 19, 2019]. Defendant shall serve non-
`infringement and invalidity contentions no later than [Plaintiff’s position: April 11,
`
`
`
`1 The parties served Initial Disclosures relating to the current patents-in-suit on January
`29, 2019. Corcept intends to file a related action against Teva in this Court, in which Corcept
`asserts infringement of additional patents that have recently been listed in the Orange Book
`for Korlym®. Corcept intends to move to consolidate these actions, and proposes herein a
`single, consolidated case schedule that accounts for both sets of patents.
`2 The parties have already exchanged initial disclosures in this lawsuit. Defendant cannot
`take a position on consolidation for a case that has not yet been filed, but opposes any delays
`to the resolution of the current lawsuit. Defendant’s position is that, if a new case is filed, the
`parties should exchange initial disclosures in that case according to the schedule set forth by
`the Federal and Local Rules.
`
`
`TEVA1064
`Teva v. Corcept
`PGR2019-00048
`
`1
`
`

`

`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`2019; Defendant’s position: March 12, 2019].3 Plaintiff shall serve infringement
`contentions and respond to invalidity contentions no later than [Plaintiff’s position: June
`25, 2019; Defendant’s position: April 25, 2019].
`
`Claim Construction. The parties shall exchange proposed terms for construction no
`later than [Plaintiff’s position: July 9, 2019; Defendant’s position: May 9, 2019]. The
`parties shall exchange preliminary proposed constructions and identifications of intrinsic
`and extrinsic evidence in support of their proposed constructions no later than [Plaintiff’s
`position: July 30, 2019; Defendant’s position: May 30, 2019]. The parties shall
`exchange an identification of all intrinsic evidence and extrinsic evidence that each party
`intends to rely upon to oppose any other party’s proposed construction no later than
`[Plaintiff’s position: August 13, 2019; Defendant’s position: June 13, 2019]. The
`parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement no later than
`[Plaintiff’s position: August 29, 2019; Defendant’s position: July 1, 2019].4 The
`parties shall complete fact discovery related to claim construction no later than
`[Plaintiff’s position: September 30, 2019; Defendant’s position: July 30, 2019]. The
`parties shall file Opening Markman submissions, including any expert declarations no
`later than [Plaintiff’s position: October 15, 2019; Defendant’s position: August 14,
`2019]. The parties shall complete expert discovery regarding Markman issues no later
`than [Plaintiff’s position: November 14, 2019; Defendant’s position: September 13,
`2019]. The parties shall file Responsive Markman submissions no later than [Plaintiff’s
`position: December 16, 2019; Defendant’s position: October 14, 2019]. The parties
`shall confer and propose to the Court a schedule for a Claim Construction Hearing, if
`necessary, no later than [Plaintiff’s position: December 30, 2019; Defendant’s position:
`October 21, 2019; Defendant proposes October 28, 2019 as the date for the Markman
`hearing, subject to the Court’s availability].
`
`Motions to Add New Parties. Any motion to add new parties, whether by amended or
`third-party complaint, must be electronically filed no later than [Plaintiff’s position:
`October 29, 2019; Defendant’s position: July 1, 2019].
`
`Motions to Amend Pleadings. Any motion to amend pleadings must be electronically
`filed no later than [Plaintiff’s position: October 29, 2019; Defendant’s position: July 1,
`2019].
`
`
`
`3 Teva cannot agree to serve non-infringement and invalidity contentions only a week
`after receiving Plaintiff’s asserted claims, particularly if newly issued patent(s) are added to
`the case.
`
` Teva respectfully requests that, if the parties do not have any disputed terms that require
`construction in the Joint Claim Construction chart and Prehearing Statement, obviating the
`need for claim-construction briefing, all the remaining deadlines, including the start of trial,
`should be accelerated by 60 days.
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`2
`
`2
`
`

`

`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Electronic Discovery. The parties are directed to Rule 26(f), as amended, which, inter
`alia, addresses preservation of discoverable information, discovery of electronically
`stored information, and claims of privilege or work product protection. The parties are
`also directed to Local Civil Rule 26.1(d) which describes the obligations of counsel with
`regard to their clients’ information management systems.
`
`Discovery Disputes. Please refer to the Court’s Civil Case Management Order.
`
`Motion Practice. Please refer to the Court’s Civil Case Management Order.
`
`Fact Discovery Deadline. Fact discovery is to remain open through [Plaintiff’s
`position: Later of Markman decision or March 30, 2020; Defendant’s position:
`November 1, 2019]. All fact witness depositions must be completed by the close of fact
`discovery. No discovery is to be issued or engaged in beyond that date, except upon
`application and for good cause shown.
`
`Expert Reports. All affirmative expert reports shall be delivered by [Plaintiff’s
`position: 60 days after the close of fact discovery; Defendant’s position: December 2,
`2019]. All responsive expert reports shall be delivered by [Plaintiff’s position: 60 days
`after opening expert reports; Defendant’s position: January 6, 2020]. All reply expert
`reports shall be delivered by [Plaintiff’s position: 30 days after responsive expert
`reports; Defendant’s position: January 27, 2020]. Depositions of all experts to be
`completed by [Plaintiff’s position: 45 days after reply expert reports; Defendant’s
`position: February 28, 2020].
`
`Form and Content of Expert Reports. All expert reports must comport with the form
`and content requirements set forth in Rule 26(a)(2)(B). No expert shall testify at trial as
`to any opinions or base those opinions on facts not substantially disclosed in the expert’s
`report.
`
`Extensions and Adjournments. Please refer to the Court’s Civil Case Management
`Order.
`
`Protective Orders. Any proposed confidentiality order agreed to by the parties must
`strictly comply with Rule 26(c), Local Civil Rule 5.3, and applicable case law. Please
`also refer to the Court’s Civil Case Management Order.
`
`Local Rules. The parties are directed to the Local Civil Rules for any other matter not
`addressed by this Order or the Court’s Civil Case Management Order
`
`FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER OR ANY
`OTHER ORDERS WILL RESULT IN SANCTIONS.
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`HONORABLE CATHY L. WALDOR
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket