throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Trials
`Deborah Sterling; Trials
`Eric Stops; Nick Cerrito; John Galanek; Frank Calvosa; Daniel Wiesner; Olga A. Partington
`RE: PGR2019-00048 - request for conference call
`Thursday, September 12, 2019 1:27:51 PM
`image001.png
`image002.png
`
`Counsel:
`Petitioner is authorized to file to file a 3-page Reply to Corcept’s Preliminary Patent Owner Response
`(“POPR”) to address statements in Corcept’s POPR regarding the schedule of the concurrent litigation
`involving the ’214 patent. Petitioner’s Reply shall be filed on or before September 23, 2019. Patent Owner
`is authorized to file a Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s Reply. Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply shall be filed on or before
`October 3, 2019. We will issue an order to this effect in due course.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`From: Deborah Sterling <DSTERLING@sternekessler.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:32 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Eric Stops <ericstops@quinnemanuel.com>; Nick Cerrito <nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com>;
`John Galanek <johngalanek@quinnemanuel.com>; Frank Calvosa
`<frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com>; Daniel Wiesner <danielwiesner@quinnemanuel.com>; Olga A.
`Partington <OPARTINGTON@sternekessler.com>
`Subject: PGR2019-00048 - request for conference call
`
`Dear Board,
`
` I
`
` write on behalf of Petitioner Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. to respectfully request a conference
`call with the Board in PGR2019-00048. Teva wishes to request authorization to file a 3-page reply to
`Corcept’s Preliminary Patent Owner Response to address certain statements in Corcept’s POPR that
`mischaracterize the schedule of the concurrent litigation involving the ’214 patent.
`
`The parties have met and conferred and counsel for Corcept has advised that Corcept will not
`oppose Teva’s request for a reply if Teva does not oppose a request from Corcept to file a 3-page
`sur-reply. Teva has agreed to not oppose a sur-reply if Teva is authorized to file a reply.
`
`The parties are available for a call at the Board’s convenience between 10 am – 5 pm Eastern time
`on September 12 or 13, to address why good cause exists.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`

`

`Deborah Sterling (Counsel for Petitioner)
`
`Deborah Sterling, Ph.D.
`Director
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005
`Email: dsterling@sternekessler.com
`Direct: 202.772.8501
`
`IP Assistant: Katherine Valencia
`Direct: 202.772.8937 Main: 202.371.2600
`
`Notice: The information in this electronic transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
`or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you
`are not an intended recipient or an authorized agent, you are hereby notified that reading, distributing, or
`otherwise disseminating or copying, or taking any action based on the contents of this transmission is strictly
`prohibited. Any unauthorized interception of this transmission is illegal under the law. If you have received
`this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and then destroy all copies of
`the transmission.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket