throbber
26 July 2013
`EMA/458028/2013
`
`
`
`European Medicines Agency recommends suspension of
`marketing authorisations for oral ketoconazole
`Benefit of oral ketoconazole does not outweigh risk of liver injury in fungal
`infections
`
`The European Medicines Agency’s Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has
`recommended that the marketing authorisations of oral ketoconazole-containing medicines should be
`suspended throughout the European Union (EU). The CHMP concluded that the risk of liver injury is
`greater than the benefits in treating fungal infections.
`
`Patients currently taking oral ketoconazole for fungal infections should make a non-urgent appointment
`with their doctor to discuss suitable alternative treatments. Doctors should no longer prescribe oral
`ketoconazole and should review patients’ treatment options.
`
`The EU-wide review of oral ketoconazole was triggered by the suspension of the medicine in France.
`The French medicine agency, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicine and Health Products
`(ANSM), concluded that the benefit-risk balance of oral ketoconazole was negative because of a high
`level of liver injury associated with the medicine and in view of the currently available alternative
`treatments, which are deemed to be safer. European legislation requires that there is a coordinated
`European approach when a Member State takes regulatory action in relation to a medicine that is
`authorised in more than one country.
`
`Having assessed the available data on the risks with oral ketoconazole, the CHMP concluded that,
`although liver injury such as hepatitis is a known side effect of antifungal medicines, the incidence and
`the seriousness of liver injury with oral ketoconazole were higher than with other antifungals. The
`CHMP was concerned that reports of liver injury occurred early after starting treatment with
`recommended doses, and it was not possible to identify measures to adequately reduce this risk. The
`Committee also concluded that the clinical benefit of oral ketoconazole is uncertain as data on its
`effectiveness are limited and do not meet current standards, and alternative treatments are available.
`
`Taking into account the increased rate of liver injury and the availability of alternative antifungal
`treatments, the CHMP concluded that the benefits did not outweigh the risks. Topical formulations of
`ketoconazole (such as creams, ointments and shampoos) can continue to be used as the amount of
`ketoconazole absorbed throughout the body is very low with these formulations.
`
`The CHMP opinion will now be sent to the European Commission for a legally binding decision.
`
`
`
` 7
`
` Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom
`Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7523 7129
`E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu
`
`
`
`
`© European Medicines Agency, 2013. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
`
`An agency of the European Union
`
`
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2042, Page 1
`
`

`

`The European Medicines Agency is aware that ketoconazole is used off-label for treating patients with
`Cushing’s syndrome. In order to ensure that these patients will not be left without treatment, national
`competent authorities may make these medicines available under controlled conditions.
`
`Information to patients
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`The European Medicines Agency has recommended the suspension of oral (by mouth) ketoconazole
`following a review of data showing higher liver toxicity with this medicine compared with other
`antifungal medicines.
`
`If you are currently taking oral ketoconazole for fungal infections, you should speak to your doctor
`at a routine appointment to discuss suitable alternative treatments.
`
`If you are taking topical formulations of ketoconazole (such as creams, ointments and shampoos),
`you can continue your treatment, as the amount of ketoconazole absorbed throughout the body is
`very low with these formulations.
`
`•
`
`If you have any questions, you should contact your doctor or pharmacist.
`
`Information to healthcare professionals
`
`Healthcare professionals should follow these recommendations:
`
`• As oral ketoconazole is no longer recommended, doctors should review patients being treated with
`this medicine for fungal infections, with a view of stopping treatment or choosing an appropriate
`alternative treatment.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Topical ketoconazole formulations have very low systemic absorption and may continue to be used
`as currently approved.
`
`Pharmacists should refer patients with a prescription of oral ketoconazole for fungal infections to
`their treating doctor.
`
`The Agency’s recommendations are based on a review by the Committee for Medicinal Products for
`Human Use (CHMP), which looked at available data on the benefits of oral ketoconazole and the risk of
`hepatotoxicity from pre-clinical and clinical studies, post-marketing spontaneous case reports,
`epidemiological studies and the scientific literature. The Committee also considered the advice from a
`group of experts in the treatment of infections.
`
`• Although the potential for hepatotoxicity is a class effect with azole antifungals, the data assessed
`show that the incidence and seriousness of hepatotoxicity is higher with ketoconazole than with
`other antifungal agents.1 Reported cases of hepatotoxicity included hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver
`failure with fatal outcomes or requiring liver transplantation.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`The onset of hepatotoxicity occurred generally between 1 and 6 months after starting treatment,
`but has also been reported earlier than 1 month after starting treatment, and at the recommended
`daily dose of 200 mg.
`
`The efficacy studies on oral ketoconazole are limited and have not been carried out in line with the
`most recently agreed guidelines2. There are also inadequate data to support the efficacy of
`ketoconazole when other treatments have failed or are not tolerated, or resistance has been
`detected.
`
`The risk minimisation measures proposed, such as limiting the treatment duration or restricting the
`use to patients refractory or intolerant to alternative treatments and to physicians experienced in
`
`
`European Medicines Agency recommends suspension of marketing authorisations for
`oral ketoconazole
`EMA/458028/2013
`
`
`
`
`Page 2/3
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2042, Page 2
`
`

`

`treating rare fungal infections, were not considered sufficient to reduce the risk of hepatotoxicity to
`an acceptable level.
`
`References.
`
`1. Garcia Rodriguez et al. A cohort study on the risk of acute liver injury among users of ketoconazole
`and other antifungal drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48(6):847-852.
`
`2. Guideline on the clinical evaluation of antifungal agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of
`invasive fungal disease CHMP/EWP/1343/01 Rev. 1, Apr 2010.
`
`
`
`More about the medicine
`
`Ketoconazole is an antifungal medicine used to treat infections caused by dermatophytes and yeasts.
`Ketoconazole taken orally (by mouth) has been authorised in the EU since 1980, and later topical (on
`the skin) formulations, such as creams, ointments and shampoos, have become available.
`
`Oral formulations of ketoconazole have been authorised in the EU via national procedures, and are
`currently available in several EU Member States under various trade names, including Nizoral and
`Fungoral.
`
`More about the procedure
`
`The review of oral ketoconazole was initiated in July 2011 at the request of France, under Article 31 of
`Directive 2001/83/EC. In June 2011, the French medicines agency concluded that the benefit-risk
`balance of oral ketoconazole was negative and suspended the existing marketing authorisations in
`France. Consequently, the French agency asked the EMA to carry out a full assessment of the benefit-
`risk balance of oral ketoconazole-containing medicines and to issue an opinion on whether their
`marketing authorisations should be maintained, varied, suspended or withdrawn across the EU.
`
`The review of oral ketoconazole has been carried out by EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for
`Human Use (CHMP), responsible for all questions concerning medicines for human use, which adopted
`the EMA’s final opinion.
`
`The CHMP opinion will be forwarded to the European Commission, which will issue a final legally
`binding decision in due course.
`
`To lift the suspension, the marketing authorisation holder for oral ketoconazole will have to provide
`convincing data that identify a group of patients in whom the benefits of the medicine outweigh their
`risks.
`
`Contact our press officer
`Monika Benstetter
`
`Tel. +44 (0)20 7418 8427
`
`E-mail: press@ema.europa.eu
`
`
`European Medicines Agency recommends suspension of marketing authorisations for
`oral ketoconazole
`EMA/458028/2013
`
`
`
`
`Page 3/3
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2042, Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket