throbber
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`R E V I E W
`
`The Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`
`Rosario Pivonello, Monica De Leo, Alessia Cozzolino, and Annamaria Colao
`
`Dipartimento Di Medicina Clinica E Chirurgia, Sezione Di Endocrinologia, Universita’ Federico II di Napoli, 80131
`Naples, Italy
`
`Cushing’s disease (CD), or pituitary-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, is a severe endocrine disease caused by a cor-
`ticotroph pituitary tumor and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The first-line treatment for CD is
`pituitary surgery, which is followed by disease remission in around 78% and relapse in around 13% of patients during
`the 10-year period after surgery, so that nearly one third of patients experience in the long-term a failure of surgery
`and require an additional second-line treatment. Patients with persistent or recurrent CD require additional treat-
`ments, including pituitary radiotherapy, adrenal surgery, and/or medical therapy. Pituitary radiotherapy is effective
`in controlling cortisol excess in a large percentage of patients, but it is associated with a considerable risk of hypop-
`ituitarism. Adrenal surgery is followed by a rapid and definitive control of cortisol excess in nearly all patients, but
`it induces adrenal insufficiency. Medical therapy has recently acquired a more important role compared to the past,
`due to the recent employment of novel compounds able to control cortisol secretion or action. Currently, medical
`therapy is used as a presurgical treatment, particularly for severe disease; or as postsurgical treatment, in cases of
`failure or incomplete surgical tumor resection; or as bridging therapy before, during, and after radiotherapy while
`waiting for disease control; or, in selected cases, as primary therapy, mainly when surgery is not an option. The
`adrenal-directed drug ketoconazole is the most commonly used drug, mainly because of its rapid action, whereas
`the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, mifepristone, is highly effective in controlling clinical comorbidities, mainly
`glucose intolerance, thus being a useful treatment for CD when it is associated with diabetes mellitus. Pituitary-
`directed drugs have the advantage of acting at the site responsible for CD, the pituitary tumor. Among this group
`of drugs, the dopamine agonist cabergoline and the somatostatin analog pasireotide result in disease remission in
`a consistent subgroup of patients with CD. Recently, pasireotide has been approved for the treatment of CD when
`surgery has failed or when surgery is not an option, and mifepristone has been approved for the treatment of
`Cushing’s syndrome when associated with impairment of glucose metabolism in case of the lack of a surgical
`indication. Recent experience suggests that the combination of different drugs may be able to control cortisol excess
`in a great majority of patients with CD. (Endocrine Reviews 36: 385–486, 2015)
`
`I. Introduction
`II. Mortality and Morbidity in Cushing’s Disease
`A. Mortality
`B. Cardiovascular disease
`C. Metabolic syndrome
`D. Infectious diseases
`E. Neuropsychiatric disorders
`III. The First-line Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`A. Treatment algorithm
`B. Criteria for remission and cure
`C. Pituitary surgery
`IV. The Second-line Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`A. Repeat pituitary surgery
`B. Pituitary radiotherapy
`C. Adrenal surgery
`V. The Medical Therapy of Cushing’s Disease
`A. Classification of medical therapy
`B. Adrenal-directed therapy
`C. Pituitary-directed therapy
`
`ISSN Print 0163-769X ISSN Online 1945-7189
`Printed in USA
`Copyright © 2015 by the Endocrine Society
`Received May 2, 2013. Accepted May 13, 2015.
`First Published Online June 11, 2015
`
`D. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists
`E. Combination therapy
`F. Experimental therapy
`VI. Summary
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Cushing’s disease (CD), or pituitary-dependent Cush-
`
`ing’s syndrome (CS), is the most common form of
`endogenous CS, accounting for around 70% of the forms
`of chronic endogenous hypercortisolism (1, 2). CD is a
`
`Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CBG, cortisol-binding globulin; CD, Cushing’s disease; CRT,
`conventional radiotherapy; CS, Cushing’s syndrome; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DDAVP, desmopres-
`sin; DDD, dichloro-diphenyl-dichloroethane; DI, diabetes insipidus; D2R, dopamine 2 receptor;
`EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GABA, ␥-aminobutyric acid; GI, gastrointestinal; GK,
`Gamma Knife; HPA, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal; LBA, laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy;
`LDDST, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test; LINAC, linear accelerator; MLC, multileaf col-
`limator; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NS, Nelson’s syndrome; OBA, open bilateral adrenal-
`ectomy;OGTT,oralglucosetolerancetest;PDI,permanentDI;POMC,proopiomelanocortin;PPAR,
`peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PRL, prolactin; SCRT, stereotactic conformal radiother-
`apy; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion; SMR, standardized mor-
`tality ratio; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; SRT, stereotactic radiotherapy; SSTR, somatostatin re-
`ceptor; TCS, transcranial surgery; TDI, transient DI; TSS, transsphenoidal surgery.
`
`doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048
`
`Endocrine Reviews, August 2015, 36(4):385– 486
`
`press.endocrine.org/journal/edrv
`
`385
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 1
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`386
`
`Pivonello et al
`
`Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`
`Endocrine Reviews, August 2015, 36(4):385– 486
`
`serious endocrine disease caused by excessive secretion of
`cortisol from the adrenal glands as a consequence of ex-
`cessive ACTH secretion from a pituitary tumor (1, 2). The
`pituitary tumor responsible for CD is generally an ade-
`noma, whereas a pituitary carcinoma is a very rare cause
`of the disease. The pituitary adenoma responsible for CD
`is a microadenoma in more than 90% of cases, and a
`macroadenoma in less than 10% of cases; microadenomas
`are not visible during radiological examination in up to
`40% of cases, and macroadenomas may occasionally ac-
`quire an aggressive behavior, characterized by a rapid
`growth and invasiveness of surrounding structures (1, 2).
`The prevalence of CD is estimated to be nearly 40 cases
`per million, whereas the incidence of CD ranges from 1.2
`to 2.4 per million per year. CD is at least three times more
`prevalent in women than in men, and mainly occurs during
`the fourth to sixth decades of life (1–3).
`CD is characterized by a disruption of the hypothala-
`mus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis with consequent in-
`crease in circulating serum and urinary cortisol levels and
`lack of cortisol circadian rhythm (1, 2). The clinical picture
`of CD mainly includes weight gain with central obesity,
`fatigue with proximal myopathy, skin thinning with pur-
`plish striae, and diffuse bruising. The clinical picture is
`commonly complicated by several comorbidities, mainly
`including systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes melli-
`tus, dyslipidemia, osteoporosis, and depression, together
`with an impairment of sexual function in men; menstrual
`disorders, acne, and hirsutism in women; and infertility in
`both men and women (1, 2).
`The diagnosis of CD is a real challenge because of the
`variability of the clinical presentation of the disease and, par-
`ticularly, the lack of discriminatory symptoms and signs in
`patients with CD (1, 2). As a consequence, a series of hor-
`monal tests are required for a definitive diagnosis; however,
`these tests have a variable sensitivity and specificity and fail
`toreach100%accuracy(4–6).Therefore,efficientscreening
`and confirmatory diagnosis are essential before considering
`therapy (7). Moreover, a prompt and effective treatment is
`crucial to prevent the development and/or worsening of the
`comorbidities and clinical complications responsible for the
`increased mortality associated with the disease (8).
`The current review summarizes the available treatments
`for CD, describing efficacy, in terms of control on hormone
`secretion and tumor mass, and safety, associated with the
`different treatments, and detailing specific effects on the clin-
`ical picture as well as on comorbidities and clinical compli-
`cations that are the most important causes of death for pa-
`tientswithCD.Anintroductiononthemortalityandmorbidity
`ofCDisincludedtoemphasizetheseverityofthediseaseandthe
`need for a treatment. Future available treatments and experi-
`mental therapeutic approaches are also considered to offer the
`
`largestpossibleviewonperspectivesinthediseasemanagement.
`This review systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of
`the different treatments, considering the available literature
`published until December 31, 2014.
`
`II. Mortality and Morbidity in Cushing’s
`Disease
`
`CD is associated with excessive mortality, which is mainly
`duetocardiovascularorinfectiousdiseases,andtheirorganicor
`systemic clinical complications. The excessive mortality is usu-
`ally observed in patients who do not achieve initial surgical re-
`mission, whereas those patients who do achieve an imme-
`diate surgical cure generally have a mortality rate
`similar to that of the normal population (9).
`
`A. Mortality
`The studies on mortality in CD have reported nonho-
`mogeneous results. Mortality in patients with CD has been
`analyzed in a series of studies, which reported the stan-
`dardized mortality ratio (SMR). In these studies, the SMR
`of the total population of patients with CD ranged from
`0.98 to 9.3 (10 –20), being significantly different from the
`normal population in six studies, where SMR ranged from
`2.39 to 9.3 (10, 15–18, 20), and similar to the normal
`population in five studies, where SMR ranged from 0.98
`to 2.67 (11–14, 19). Moreover, eight of these studies eval-
`uated mortality in patients submitted to surgical treat-
`ment, considering separately those who had disease re-
`mission and those with persistent disease; the results of
`these studies demonstrated that patients with persistent
`disease consistently had the highest mortality (13–20),
`whereas the patients with disease remission after pituitary
`surgery had a mortality rate generally similar to that of the
`general population (13–15, 17, 19). This finding suggests
`the importance of surgical removal of the pituitary tumor
`and disease remission. However, in contrast with these
`previous studies, the persistence of an increased mortality
`rate in patients who achieved disease remission after pi-
`tuitary surgery has been reported in three different retro-
`spective studies conducted in the United Kingdom (16, 18,
`20). In the first of these studies, the SMR of the total pop-
`ulation of CD patients was 4.8, with patients achieving
`surgical cure maintaining a significantly increased mor-
`tality (SMR, 3.3). Interestingly, patients with persistent or
`recurrent disease displayed a dramatically increased mor-
`tality (SMR, 16) compared with the normal population
`(16). In a recent study, the SMR of the total population of
`CD patients was 3.17, with an increased mortality rate
`both in patients achieving surgical cure (SMR, 2.47) and
`in patients with persistence or recurrence of the disease
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 2
`
`

`

`doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048
`
`press.endocrine.org/journal/edrv
`
`387
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`after surgery (SMR, 4.12), although these values were re-
`ported to be not significantly different from that of the
`normal population (18). Finally, another recent study has
`demonstrated a similar mortality rate between patients
`cured or not cured by surgery, displaying an SMR of
`around 10, compared with the normal population (20). It
`is worthwhile noting a study conducted in New Zealand
`that demonstrated a persistently increased mortality rate
`in patients harboring either a pituitary microadenoma or
`macroadenoma, despite long-term remission after pitu-
`itary surgery (17). In contrast to the discordant evidence of
`the mortality risk in patients cured by surgery, there is
`consistent evidence that patients with persistent disease
`after initial surgery have the highest mortality rate. This
`finding has been clearly reported in a Danish study in
`which patients not cured after initial surgery had a SMR
`of 5.06; interestingly, patients with possible CD whose
`disease etiology was unproven had an SMR of 11.5. The
`group with unproven CD included those without clear
`identification of a pituitary tumor, those who did not
`achieve remission after surgery, and those who died before
`a full investigation could be performed (13).
`The major cause of death in patients with CD reported
`in the literature is represented by cardiovascular disease
`and consequent cardiovascular events, although infec-
`tious diseases and consequent sepsis seem to play an im-
`portant role in determining or precipitating death, and
`suicide associated with psychiatric disorders is also de-
`scribed in patients with CD (8 –20).
`The predictive factors for mortality have not been
`clearly identified in patients with CD. Indeed, whereas age
`at disease diagnosis seems to have a clear negative role in
`determining premature death (10, 11, 17, 19, 20), the ev-
`idence regarding the role of gender is discordant because
`an increased mortality in females (10), a similar mortality
`in females and males (13), and an increased mortality in
`males (19) have each been reported. Moreover, the higher
`prevalence of deaths in patients during active disease,
`compared with patients after surgical remission in most
`studies suggests a pivotal role for the exposure to cortisol
`excess in mortality. The presence and duration of active
`disease have been clearly confirmed as an important pre-
`dictive factor for mortality (13–16, 19). However, the role
`of exposure to cortisol excess, in terms of extent and du-
`ration, still needs to be clarified. The presence of comor-
`bidities, including systemic arterial hypertension and di-
`abetes mellitus, has been indicated as a predictive factor
`for mortality in different studies (10, 16, 17). Two recent
`studies in a large number of patients with CD have ad-
`dressed the issue of the predictive factors for mortality.
`One study confirmed that cardiovascular disease repre-
`sents the main cause of death in patients with CD, with
`
`male gender, age at diagnosis, disease duration, and clin-
`ical complications elevating the risk of cardiovascular dis-
`ease (21). In particular, age at diagnosis, duration of ex-
`posure to cortisol excess, and preoperative plasma ACTH
`concentration elevated the risk of death in the total cohort
`of patients; on the other hand, male gender, age at the
`diagnosis, and depression were the main determinants for
`mortality in patients who achieved immediate remission
`after pituitary surgery or late remission after second-line
`treatments (21). In the second study, mortality associated
`with CS was demonstrated to be strongly dependent on the
`multisystem morbidity of CS, although mainly cardiovas-
`cular disease and infectious diseases (22).
`Table 1 summarizes the results of the main studies on
`mortality, including the evaluation of the SMR, in CD.
`It should be taken into account that geographic vari-
`ability in the management of CD can induce differences in
`reported mortality rates. The recent MISSION (Mortality
`in Cushing’s Syndrome: an International and Observa-
`tional Study of the European Neuroendocrine Associa-
`tion) study collected information on nearly 5000 patients
`with CS from around the world and confirmed that pa-
`tients with CD had an increased mortality (crude mortality
`rate, 4.25), mainly associated with disease activity (crude
`mortality rate of patients with active CD, 24.45) and
`mostly secondary to cardiovascular disease, often result-
`ing in fatal cardiovascular events, and infectious diseases,
`especially when leading to generalized sepsis, since myo-
`cardial infarction or heart failure represents 17.5% and
`severe infection or sepsis represents 17.3% of the causes of
`death (23). A recent meta-analysis on mortality in patients
`with CS, including six studies that focused on patients
`with CD, confirmed that CD is associated with an in-
`creased mortality, documented by an estimated cumula-
`tive SMR of 1.84. Patients with persistent or recurrent
`disease after surgery had a strong association with an in-
`creased mortality, with an SMR of 3.73, whereas the SMR
`of patients with cured disease after surgery, with an SMR
`of 1.2, was not significantly different from that of the
`normal population (24). This meta-analysis, in accor-
`dance with most of the available studies, seems to suggest
`that surgical cure is fundamental for protecting patients
`with CD from a premature death. This conclusion should,
`however, be interpreted with caution. Although a meta-
`analysis has the strength of a systematic approach, with
`the inclusion of only those studies with a clear SMR cal-
`culated from available data, it also has the drawback of a
`limited number of studies that include a relatively small
`number of patients with a relatively short period of fol-
`low-up and few analyzable events.
`In summary, the results of the studies on mortality in
`CD demonstrate that patients with active disease, mainly
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 3
`
`

`

`388
`
`Pivonello et al
`
`Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`
`Endocrine Reviews, August 2015, 36(4):385– 486
`
`Table 1. Results of the Main Studies on Mortality in CD
`
`First
`Author,
`Year (Ref.)
`
`Etxabe,
`1994
`(10)
`
`Country
`
`Spain
`
`Patient
`Type (n)
`
`CD (49)
`
`Sex
`Ratio
`(F/M), n
`
`46/3
`
`Duration
`of Follow-
`Up
`as Mean ⴞ
`SE or
`Median
`(Range), y
`6.3 ⫾ 0.8
`
`SMR Total
`Population
`(95% CI)
`
`SMR
`Cured
`Disease
`(95% CI)
`
`SMR
`Persistent/
`Recurrent
`Disease
`(95% CI)
`
`Study Design
`
`Population-based
`study
`
`3.8 (2.5–
`17.9)a
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`Swearingen,
`1999
`(11)
`Pikkarainen,
`1999
`(12)
`
`United States
`
`CD (161)
`
`129/32
`
`8.7 (1–20)
`
`Finland
`
`CS (74),
`CD (43)
`
`7.4 (0 –15)
`
`CS 64/
`10
`CD
`38/5
`
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`
`0.98
`(0.44 –
`2.2)
`2.67
`(0.89 –
`5.25)
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`Main Causes of
`Death
`
`Cardiovascular disease;
`infectious diseases
`
`Cardiovascular disease;
`stroke
`
`Predictive Factors
`
`Age at diagnosis;
`female gender;
`persistence of
`hypertension
`and
`abnormalities of
`glucose
`metabolism
`Age at diagnosis
`
`NA
`
`Denmark
`
`CS (166),
`CD (73)b
`
`CD 50/
`23b
`
`8.1 (3.1–
`14.0)
`
`National registry
`study
`
`1.7 (0.68 –
`3.5)
`
`United States
`
`CD (289)
`
`239/50
`
`11.1 (0.6 –
`24.1)
`
`1.42
`(0.95–
`2.1)
`
`Disease persistence
`
`0.31
`(0.01–
`1.72)
`1.18 (0.7–
`1.9)
`
`5.06
`(1.86 –
`11.0)a
`2.8 (1.35–
`5.9)a
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`Coronary heart disease;
`mitral valve
`insufficiency and
`heart failure; acute
`myocardial
`infarction;
`pancreatitis
`Stroke; malignancy;
`sepsis; rupture of
`aortic aneurysmb
`Disease persistence Myocardial infarction
`and/or cardiac
`failure; cardiac
`arrestc
`Cardiovascular disease;
`malignancy;
`infectious diseases
`Cardiovascular disease;
`cerebrovascular
`disease; malignancy;
`rupture of aortic
`aneurysm
`Malignancy; ischemic
`heart disease;
`stroke; sepsis;
`pulmunary
`embolismd
`
`Disease duration
`
`Disease
`persistence;
`hypertension;
`diabetes
`
`Age at diagnosis;
`diabetes
`mellitus at last
`follow-up;
`treatment with
`pituitary surgery
`or bilateral
`adrenalectomy
`NA
`
`Age at diagnosis;
`male gender;
`disease
`duration;
`disease activity
`Age at diagnosis
`
`Cardiovascular disease;
`malignancy;
`infectious diseases
`
`Cardiovascular disease;
`cerebrovascular
`disease; infectious
`diseases and sepsis
`
`Cardiovascular disease;
`infectious diseases
`and sepsis;
`malignancy
`
`Lindholm,
`2001
`(13)
`Hammer,
`2004
`(14)
`
`Dekkers,
`2007
`(15)
`Clayton,
`2011
`(16)
`
`Bolland,
`2011
`(17)
`
`Hassan-
`Smith,
`2012
`(18)
`Yaneva,
`2013
`(19)
`
`The Netherlands
`
`CD (74)
`
`56/18
`
`12.8 ⫾ 7.3
`
`United Kingdom CD (60)
`
`51/9
`
`15 (0.5– 41)
`
`New Zealand
`
`CS (253),
`CD (188)
`
`CS 192/
`61
`CD
`142/
`46
`
`Macro, 6.9
`(0 –30);
`micro,
`7.5 (0 –
`46)
`
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`
`Nationwide
`retrospective
`survey
`
`United Kingdom CD (80)
`
`63/17
`
`10.9 (4.9 –
`15.6)
`
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`
`2.39
`(1.22–
`3.9)a
`4.8 (2.8 –
`8.3)a
`
`1.8 (0.71–
`3.37)
`
`3.3 (1.7–
`6.7)a
`
`4.38
`(1.38 –
`9.07)a
`16 (6.7–
`38.4)a
`
`Macro, 3.5
`(1.3–
`7.8)a;
`micro,
`3.2
`(2.0 –
`4.8)a
`
`Macro, 2.3
`(0.4 –
`7.5);
`micro,
`3.1
`(1.8 –
`4.9)a
`
`3.17 (1.7–
`5.43)a
`
`2.47 (0.8 –
`5.77)a
`
`Macro, 5.7
`(1.4 –
`15.4)a;
`micro,
`2.4
`(0.4 –
`7.8)a
`
`4.12
`(1.12–
`10.54)
`
`2.4 (0.87–
`8.19)a,f
`
`Bulgaria
`
`CS (386),
`CD (240)
`
`8.8
`(0 – 41.2)
`
`Retrospective
`single-center
`study
`
`1.88
`(0.69 –
`4.08)
`
`1.67
`(0.61–
`3.62)e
`
`CS 324/
`62,
`CD
`197/
`43
`CS 157/
`52,
`CD
`137/
`45
`
`Ntali, 2013
`(20)
`
`United Kingdom CS (209),
`CD (182)
`
`12 (0.1– 46)
`
`Retrospective
`multicenter
`study
`
`9.3 (6.2–
`13.4)a
`
`8.3 (5.1–
`12.7)a
`
`9.9 (3.6 –
`21.9)a
`
`This table includes studies including the calculation of SMR. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; F, female; M, male; NA, not available.
`a The SMR is significantly different from the general population.
`b The population of CD considered was that with proven pituitary etiology.
`c The main causes of death described in this study are exclusively related to the short-term follow-up (within six months after surgery), whereas information on causes
`of death after long-term follow-up is not available.
`d The main causes of death are related to the entire population of patients with CS.
`e The SMR is related to the entire population of CS.
`f The SMR is the related to the entire population of active CS.
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 4
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048
`
`press.endocrine.org/journal/edrv
`
`389
`
`those with persistent or recurrent disease after surgery,
`have a seriously increased mortality, whereas some dis-
`crepancies are evident regarding the data on patients who
`achieved surgical cure. It cannot be excluded that these
`discrepancies may partially depend on the definition of
`“cure” applied in the single studies, considering that a
`consensus has never been reached on this issue. Nonethe-
`less, it is clear that the normalization of cortisol secretion
`improves mortality, most likely because of the positive
`effects on the clinical comorbidities associated with CD,
`
`including cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, in-
`fectious diseases, and neuropsychiatric disorders, which
`affect quality of life and represent the important risk of
`death for patients with CD (8).
`Figure 1 shows the main comorbidities and clinical com-
`plications associated with mortality in patients with CD.
`
`B. Cardiovascular disease
`Cardiovascular disease represents the direst complica-
`tion and the leading cause of death in patients with CD (8).
`
`Figure 1.
`
`Figure 1. Comorbidities and clinical complications associated with excessive mortality in CD.
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 5
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`390
`
`Pivonello et al
`
`Treatment of Cushing’s Disease
`
`Endocrine Reviews, August 2015, 36(4):385– 486
`
`Cardiovascular risk is increased in CD because of the co-
`morbidities associated with the disease and including vis-
`ceral obesity, impairment of glucose tolerance or diabetes
`mellitus, dyslipidemia, and systemic arterial hypertension,
`which are constituent elements of metabolic syndrome, as
`well as thrombosis diathesis (25–27). Cardiovascular dis-
`ease associated with CD includes both vascular and car-
`diac diseases.
`
`1. Vascular diseases
`Arterial atherosclerosis is the main vascular disease as-
`sociated with CD. Indeed, carotid artery wall thickness, a
`strong predictor of systemic atherosclerosis, was found to
`be significantly increased and associated with the prema-
`ture development of plaques in patients with CD during
`active disease, partially persisting after a short-term re-
`mission (28). Moreover, an increased prevalence of
`preatherosclerotic and atherosclerotic lesions was also
`found after long-term disease remission from CD (29).
`The carotid vascular damage was significantly and inde-
`pendently correlated with the degree of visceral obesity
`and insulin resistance, demonstrating that these two fac-
`tors mainly contribute to the presence and persistence of
`vascular damage in patients with CD, both before and
`after disease remission (28, 29). In patients with CS, in-
`cluding both patients with CD and adrenal-dependent CS,
`an increased wall thickness and an increased prevalence of
`atherosclerotic plaques were described in multiple vascu-
`lar locations (30), whereas in patients with CS, mainly
`represented by ectopic CS, an increased prevalence of ath-
`erosclerotic plaques was documented in the coronary ar-
`tery system (31), confirming that hypercortisolism induces
`a premature arterial atherosclerosis in the entire vascular
`system with a consequent predisposition to coronary heart
`disease and myocardial infarction, as well as to cerebro-
`vascular diseases and stroke. A functional alteration of the
`vascular system, evaluated by an endothelium-dependent
`flow-mediated vasodilation, was reported to be impaired
`in patients with CS compared with controls, contributing
`to the vascular damage associated with CS (32). The de-
`velopment of vascular disease is strictly dependent on two
`of the main cardiovascular clinical features of CS, includ-
`ing systemic arterial hypertension and thrombosis diathe-
`sis, the latter of which is due to coagulation disorders.
`
`2. Systemic arterial hypertension
`Hypertension is a common feature of CS, and it has
`been reported in 55– 85% of patients with CD, where it
`represents an important factor for the development of
`both vascular and cardiac damage (8). The most impor-
`tant mechanism underlying the hypertension associated
`with CS lies in the activation of the mineralcorticoid re-
`
`ceptor by the excessive cortisol levels (33–36). In addition,
`multiple factors including the activation of the renin-an-
`giotensin system, together with increased reactivity of va-
`soconstrictor and decreased reactivity to the vasodilatory
`system, increased cardiac output and peripheral resis-
`tance, mainly the consequence of an increased sensitivity
`to catecholamines, may contribute to the development of
`hypertension in CS (33–36). The circadian blood pressure
`rhythm is generally altered in patients with CD, showing
`the typical nondipping pattern, which is related to greater
`end-organ damage and increased mortality (37). Hyper-
`tension associated with CS can be difficult to treat without
`the direct relief from hypercortisolism (36). However, be-
`sides the control of hypercortisolism, different antihyper-
`tensive drugs often need to be used to control hypertension
`in patients with CS during active disease; recently, a patho-
`physiology-oriented therapeutic algorithm has been de-
`veloped, and it could serve as a first attempt to rationalize
`the treatment of hypertension in CS (36). Moreover, hy-
`pertension can persist even after remission; this is because
`of either a possible coexistence of essential hypertension or
`permanent damage incurred by cortisol excess in the car-
`diovascular system (33–37).
`
`3. Thrombosis diathesis
`Thrombosis diathesis is a dangerous feature associated
`with CD, where hemostasis abnormalities have been de-
`scribed in around 54% of patients and consequent vascu-
`lar events in 10% of patients with CD (8). The increase in
`thrombosis risk associated with CD is not only a conse-
`quence of metabolic syndrome, but also a consequence of
`a specific coagulopathy, which represents another impor-
`tant factor contributing to the increase in cardiovascular
`risk in patients with CS, and particularly in patients with
`CD (38 – 40). Indeed, the cortisol excess stimulates the
`synthesis of several clotting factors, such as fibrinogen by
`the liver and von Willebrand factor by endothelial cells,
`and also induces the synthesis of plasminogen activator
`inhibitor, which is the main inhibitor of the fibrinolysis
`(38 – 40). The hypercoagulable state is considered a crucial
`factor predisposing patients with CS to thromboembolic
`events, mostly after surgery, suggesting the usefulness of
`an anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with CS before
`being subjected to surgery in order to prevent postopera-
`tive thrombotic events (38 – 40). Moreover, the increased
`homocysteine and decreased taurine levels, which have
`been described in patients with CD, complicate the pro-
`thrombotic state and the cardiovascular risk associated
`with CD (41, 42).
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2006, Page 6
`
`

`

`doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048
`
`press.endocrine.org/journal/edrv
`
`391
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article-abstract/36/4/385/2354703 by guest on 21 August 2019
`
`4. Cardiac diseases
`In contrast to the vascular system, cardiac morphology
`and performance have not been extensively studied in CD.
`An abnormal left ventricular geometry has been described
`to be associated with an increase in left ventricular mass in
`patients with CS (43, 44). These structural abnormalities
`were associated with diastolic dysfunction (43) or with
`normal diastolic function (44), and generally with a pre-
`served systolic function (43, 44). Abnormalities in cardiac
`morphology and performance have been reported to be
`partially (44) or totally reversible (45) upon normalization
`of hypercortisolism and disease remission, independently
`on change in blood pressure. An alteration of the sympa-
`thovagal balance of heart rate variability has also been
`found to be associated with an increased risk of cardiac
`events, suggesting the possible occurrence of silent ar-
`rhythmias and/or myocardial ischemia in patients with CS
`(46). Indeed, an increased prevalence of coronary artery
`disease has been documented in patients with cured CS, so
`that patients, especially young and female patients, re-
`mained at risk of myocardial infarction even after long-
`term cure (47).
`
`C. Metabolic syndrome
`The increased cardiovascular risk of patients with CD
`is associated with metabolic syndrome (26). Metabolic
`syndrome is a severe clinical condition affecting approx-
`imately 30 – 40% of the general population, being char-
`acterized by systemic arterial hypertension, together with
`visceral obesity, impairment of glucose metabolism, and
`dyslipidemia (48). Metabolic syndrome is common in de-
`veloped countries, due to obesity and sedentary lifestyles,
`but whether it is a true syndrome or a chance association
`of unrelated phenotypes is controversial (49). However,
`there is general agreement that metabolic syndrome is as-
`sociated with an increased risk to health; in particular, it
`is associated with a 5-fold risk of developing diabetes mel-
`litus and a 2-fold risk of developing cardiovascular disease
`after 5–10 years (49). A considerable disagreement also
`exists regarding the diagnostic criteria for metabolic syn-
`drome, which however are based on the following specific
`clinical and biochemical features: 1) visceral obesity, rep-
`resented by an increased waist circumference; 2) dyslipi-
`demia, represented by increased serum triglycerides or de-
`creased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, or
`the
`presence of antidyslipidemic treatments; 3) impairment of
`glucose metabolism, represented by increased fasting
`plasma glucose levels, or the presence of antidiabetic treat-
`ments; and 4) hypertension, represented by increased
`blood pressure or the presence of antihypertensive treat-
`ment (49). These criteria are frequently met in CS, which
`appears as a severe form of metabolic syndrome, suggest-
`
`ing a crucial role of cortisol excess in the genesis of met-
`abolic syndrome, probably through the development of
`visceral obesity and insulin resistance (49). The role of
`cortisol excess on the development of metabolic syndrome
`is confirmed by the evidence that metabolic syndrome is
`more severe in patients with CS who demonstrate a pecu-
`liar abdominal obesity and a severe insulin resistance, as-
`sociated with dramatically elevated cortisol levels, as op-
`posed to patients with obesity but without CS, usually
`characterized by a more generalized obesity and a variable
`insulin resistance associated with absent or slightly ele-
`vated cortisol levels. This confirms a role for visceral ad-
`iposity and the associated insulin resistance

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket