throbber
Review
`
`No Increased Risk of Ketoconazole Toxicity
`in Drug–Drug Interaction Studies
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
`2016, 56(10) 1203–1211
`C(cid:2) 2016, The American College of
`Clinical Pharmacology
`DOI: 10.1002/jcph.795
`
`No´emi Outeiro, MDent, Nicolas Hohmann, MD, and Gerd Mikus, MD, MSc
`
`Abstract
`In July 2013 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a safety announcement regarding the use of ketoconazole and its adverse drug
`reactions. The FDA report advised against the use ketoconazole tablets as a first-line treatment for any fungal infections because of the risk of
`potentially serious drug–drug interactions and liver and adrenal gland complications. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) also proposed to limit
`the use of oral ketoconazole in fungal infections because of the same risk of harmful effects and interactions. In addition, the FDA also advised against
`the use of oral ketoconazole in drug interaction studies, in which it has been extensively used as an index inhibitor of drug metabolism. The aim of this
`investigation was to evaluate the risks of ketoconazole-induced hepatotoxicity described by the FDA and EMA in published drug interaction studies
`with ketoconazole and compare these data with the toxicity reported for ketoconazole when used as antifungal treatment. In the drug interaction
`studies (2355 participants; healthy volunteers and patients; median treatment duration, 6 days), only 40 participants were reported to have increased
`liver transaminase activity (1.7%), and no deaths were reported or associated with ketoconazole. In studies investigating ketoconazole treatment,
`patients were treated for 276 days (median), and 5.6% of patients had elevated liver enzyme activity. Because of the short treatment period in drug
`interaction studies the risk of drug-induced hepatic injury is considered very low. As such, we recommend that ketoconazole remain a safe CYP3A
`index inhibitor for use in drug interaction studies with healthy volunteers.
`
`Keywords
`CYP3A inhibition, ketoconazole, hepatic toxicity, adverse events
`
`infections im-
`invasive fungal
`The management of
`proved significantly with the introduction of ketocona-
`zole in 1981, as did tolerability and adverse effects,
`compared with amphotericin B.1,2 Triggered by the
`observation of the clinically significant terfenadine–
`ketoconazole drug interaction and after the introduc-
`tion of fluconazole and itraconazole, the clinical utility
`of ketoconazole as an systemic antifungal treatment
`changed. Ketoconazole became widely used as a proto-
`typic CYP3A inhibitor in vitro and in vivo, especially
`to establish the “worst-case” scenario for CYP3A-
`mediated interactions.1,2
`The first reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
`for the broad-spectrum antimycotic drug ketoconazole
`occurred in 1982, reported in the United States and
`other countries.3 The liver was the organ most affected
`by ketoconazole exposure. The effect of
`treatment
`with ketoconazole ranged from asymptomatic transient
`irregularities of liver enzyme activity to potentially fatal
`acute hepatic necrosis. Serious ADRs are usually rare.4
`The recent European Medicines Agency (EMA)–
`approved Summary of Product Characteristics5 for
`ketoconazole lists the following adverse effects (and
`frequency):
`
`Very common (ࣙ1/10): liver function tests abnormal,
`hepatic enzyme increased.
`
`Common (ࣙ1/100 to <1/10): adrenal insufficiency, nau-
`sea, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, pruritus,
`rash.
`Uncommon: (ࣙ1/1,000 to <1/100): thrombocytopenia,
`allergic conditions including anaphylactic shock, ana-
`phylactoid reaction and anaphylactic reaction, and
`angioedema, headache, dizziness, somnolence, ur-
`ticaria, alopecia, asthenia, platelet count decreased.
`
`In July 2013 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) released a safety announcement regarding ad-
`verse reactions and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) re-
`lated to ketoconazole exposure.6 In its report the FDA
`advised avoiding the use of ketoconazole tablets as a
`first-line treatment for any fungal infections because
`of the risk of clinically serious drug–drug interactions
`and adverse effects related to hepatic and adrenal
`gland complications. The EMA also recommended a
`
`Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology,
`University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
`
`Submitted for publication 20 May 2016; accepted 8 July 2016.
`
`Corresponding Author:
`Gerd Mikus, MD, Department Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepi-
`demiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410,
`69120 Heidelberg, Germany
`Email: gerd.mikus@med.uni-heidelberg.de
`
`1
`
`TEVA1074
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`
`

`

`1204
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology / Vol 56 No 10 2016
`
`restriction on the use of oral ketoconazole in the
`management of fungal infections because of the risk
`of ADRs such as drug interactions, liver toxicity, and
`adrenal insufficiency.7,8
`Moreover, by the end of 2013 the FDA also rec-
`ommended against the use of ketoconazole in drug–
`drug interaction studies,9 although in the current draft
`guideline on “Drug Interaction Studies—Study Design,
`Data Analysis, Implications for Dosing, and Labeling
`Recommendations,”10 the use of ketoconazole as an
`inhibitor of CYP3A is still recommended. A recently
`published analysis of 53 drug–drug interaction (DDI)
`studies (2005–2015) including 971 healthy volunteers
`with systemic ketoconazole exposure reported no en-
`hanced risk of ketoconazole-related toxicity.11 Further-
`more, there is an ongoing discussion concerning the
`optimal alternative to replace ketoconazole as an index
`inhibitor for CYP3A-mediated metabolism for use in
`DDI studies.12,13
`The aim of the present investigation was to eval-
`uate the risks of ketoconazole-induced hepatotoxicity
`as identified by the FDA and EMA in 2013 in all
`published DDI studies conducted using ketoconazole
`and compare these data with the incidence of toxicity
`reported during antifungal ketoconazole treatment.
`
`Methods
`A literature search was carried out by screening
`PUBMED for the terms ketoconazole (“ketocona-
`zole”[MeSH Terms] OR “ketoconazole”[All Fields]).
`Found were 8129 articles; randomized clinical trials,
`longitudinal studies, case reports, and literature reviews
`were included until September 2015.
`All titles and abstracts from the 8129 articles were
`read and divided into several groups accordingly:
`
`r “In vivo” interactions with ketoconazole
`Case reports
`Original research studies
`Literature reviews
`r Toxicity related to ketoconazole use
`Case reports
`Original research studies
`Literature reviews
`r Ketoconazole pharmacokinetic studies
`
`All available full-text articles were analyzed accord-
`ing to study population (healthy volunteers or patients),
`number of participants per study, the substrate used
`(and its dose), and the ketoconazole dose and length
`of treatment period. The total dose of ketoconazole
`was calculated and the number of
`treatment days
`with a 400-mg standard daily dose. In addition, area
`under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC),
`peak plasma concentration (Cmax), clearance (CL), and
`
`Figure 1. Summary of the total ketoconazole studies.
`
`terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of the substrate
`with and without ketoconazole coadministration were
`recorded; safety reports and laboratory values indica-
`tive of liver injury including alanine aminotransferase
`(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity
`were extracted when recorded. Cmax and AUC ratios
`of the substrates were calculated as measures of expo-
`sure during ketoconazole coadministration divided by
`exposure without ketoconazole. Descriptive statistical
`parameters were obtained using Prism 6.0 (GraphPad
`Software, La Jolla, California).
`
`Results
`From the 8129 articles found, 358 reported were
`selected and divided into the groups accordingly
`(Figure 1). Of these 224 full-text articles were acquired.
`The articles used are listed in the supplement.
`
`DDI Studies
`In the 126 articles of the group “in vivo” ketocona-
`zole interaction studies, AUC values extracted from
`120 articles were evaluated. A total of 161 studies
`were analyzed because there was more than 1 study
`reported per article (several substrates tested or differ-
`ent ketoconazole doses compared). From these studies
`106 used a single dose of the substrate, 55 studies
`employed a multiple dose, and 27 studies used both
`single- and multiple-dose regimens in the study design.
`In 10 studies a single oral dose of ketoconazole was
`used, whereas in 151 studies a multiple-dose regimen of
`ketoconazole was employed. From 9 studies calculation
`of AUC ratios (AUCRs) of the “victim” drug was not
`possible, in 6 studies no AUC values for the victim drug
`
`2
`
`

`

`1205
`
`values throughout the study (without providing any
`specific data), 3 explicitly reported no events of hep-
`atic toxicity,15–17 1 article stated there were no ADRs
`attributable to ketoconazole,17 and 18 articles reported
`changes in the laboratory values of ALT and AST
`activity; however, only 5 provided data on ALT and/or
`AST activity of study participants (Table 1).
`The mean total dose of ketoconazole administered
`per study was 2767 mg (median, 2400 mg). The highest
`total cumulative dose of ketoconazole administered
`to healthy volunteers was 11.2 g (400 mg/day for
`28 days), and no serious ADRs were reported in this
`study.18 The highest total cumulative dose administered
`to patients with advanced prostate carcinoma was
`16.8 g (400 mg 3 times daily for 14 days), and there
`were no reported episodes of hepatotoxicity, although
`fatigue and weakness were reported, and it the severity
`was reported to increase with higher ketoconazole
`doses.16
`Three studies in healthy volunteers reported an
`episode of increased transaminase activity. In 1 study
`15 healthy volunteers were administered ketoconazole
`200 mg twice daily for 9 days, and 1 participant with-
`drew from the study because of increased transami-
`nase activity19; in another study 42 healthy volunteers
`received ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 9 days,
`and 2 participants withdrew prematurely because of
`elevated hepatic enzyme activity and headache.20 One
`participant was reported to have abnormal laboratory
`tests including elevated liver function tests after keto-
`conazole administration and before taking the study
`drug (L-771,688), which was considered unrelated to
`the study. The participant was found to be infected with
`the hepatitis C virus.14
`In a clinical trial involving patients 1 participant of
`13 cancer patients receiving 400 mg ketoconazole/day
`for 4 days was reported to have elevated total biliru-
`bin serum concentrations without a history of liver
`disease.21
`To account for different ketoconazole dosing regi-
`mens the treatment duration of a standardized dose of
`400 mg/day of ketoconazole was calculated. Healthy
`participants were administered ketoconazole for a me-
`dian of 6 days, with 5 days the most often used
`administration duration, followed by 7 days. For the
`drug interaction studies involving patients the median
`duration of ketoconazole treatment was 5 days, with
`3 days the most common period of ketoconazole ad-
`ministration.
`
`Toxicity During Therapy Studies With Ketoconazole
`Fifty-five articles that reported studies in which ke-
`toconazole was used as an antifungal treatment were
`analyzed—36 of these article were clinical studies, 12
`were literature reviews, and 7 were case reports. In some
`
`Drug interaction studies
`
`healthy
`patients
`
`20
`
`40
`
`50
`
`Toxicity studies
`
`>1500
`
`Outeiro et al
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`Number of study participants
`
`40
`
`50
`
`1500
`
`0
`
`20
`
`500
`1000
`Treatment duration (days)
`Figure 2. Treatment duration of ketoconazole treatment (normalized
`to 400 mg/day) in drug interaction and treatment studies.
`
`were provided, and in 3 studies incomplete values (only
`ketoconazole AUC or only the victim drug’s AUC) were
`provided. The majority of DDI studies were performed
`in healthy volunteers (82.5%), and only 17.5% were
`carried out in patients with the target indication or renal
`impairment. In total, 2355 participants were exposed to
`ketoconazole in the drug interaction studies captured in
`this analysis.
`The duration of ketoconazole administration varied
`considerably in the 151 drug interaction studies, shown
`in Figure 2 (range, 2–29 days; median, 6 days). In
`most cases ketoconazole was administered for 5 days;
`the second most common duration of administration
`used in these studies was 7 days. The administered
`doses of ketoconazole varied among 400 mg once daily
`(79 studies), 400 mg twice daily (1 study), 400 mg 3
`times daily (1 study), 200 mg once daily (40 studies),
`200 mg twice daily (34 studies), 200 mg 3 times daily (1
`study), 100 mg once daily (2 studies), 100 mg twice daily
`(1 study), and 600 mg once daily (2 studies). In some of
`the studies more than 1 dose of ketoconazole was tested
`(eg, 400 mg once daily and 200 mg once daily).
`From the 161 interaction studies, 152 reported
`AUC values, and the AUCR of the victim drug with
`and without ketoconazole coadministration was calcu-
`lated. The highest AUCR was approximately 60.0 for
`L-771,688, a strong and highly selective experimental
`α1-adrenoceptor antagonist with demonstrated effects
`on clinical urodynamics.14 All drugs with an AUCR
`above 2.0 (moderate to strong inhibition) are presented
`in Figure 3.
`
`Toxicity Reported in Interaction Studies
`Of the 126 articles reporting drug interaction studies,
`20 did not report or describe any ADRs, and 3 articles
`reported ADRs without adequate details of the event,
`leaving 103 articles available for analysis. From the
`103 articles, 32 did not report any details of liver
`function tests, 49 reported no changes in the laboratory
`
`3
`
`

`

`1206
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology / Vol 56 No 10 2016
`
`1
`
`2
`
`5
`
`AUCR
`10
`
`20
`
`50
`
`L-771,688
`ebastine
`nisoldipine
`ibrutinib
`voclosporin
`ABT-384
`everolimus
`midazolam
`triazolam
`casopitant
`ridaforolimus
`bosutinib
`budesonide
`midazolam
`quetiapine
`midazolam
`midostaurin
`tolvaptan
`levo-acetyl-a-methadol
`neratinib
`ranitidine
`maraviroc
`mirodenafil
`sotrastaurin
`loratadine
`casopitant
`alprazolam
`lapatinib
`ranolazine
`domperidone
`ranolazine
`udenafil
`crizotinib
`nilotinib
`saquinavir
`tamsulosin
`drospirenone
`rivaroxaban
`tolterodine
`saxagliptin
`oxycodone
`darunavir
`ixabepilone
`methylprednisolone
`antipyrine
`drospirenone
`ixabepilone
`bosentan
`ixabepilone
`tolterodine
`axitinib
`cinacalcet
`paritaprevir
`apixaban
`
`Figure 3. AUC ratios (AUCRs) of the victim drug with and without ketoconazole extracted from the screened literature; only AUCRs greater than
`2 (moderate to strong inhibition) are shown.
`
`cases there was more than 1 study per article (different
`periods of administration or different ketoconazole
`doses), providing a total of 80 studies included in this
`analysis. The total number of patients treated with ke-
`toconazole was 4427, and the duration of ketoconazole
`treatment and/or the dose given was provided in 72
`studies.
`The duration of ketoconazole treatment was highly
`variable (see Figure 2). The median ketoconazole treat-
`ment duration was 276 days, and the median total
`cumulative dose of ketoconazole administered was
`73 g.
`In 1 study ketoconazole was reported to be used
`for a period of 3650 days (10 years, 51 patients)
`coadministered with cyclosporine in kidney transplant
`patients.22 In this study the ketoconazole dose regimen
`
`was 100 mg/day, and in some patients the daily dose
`was reduced to 50 mg/day. This study includes a control
`group that did not receive ketoconazole treatment.
`The total ketoconazole dose administered was typically
`365 g (when taken as 100 mg daily).
`The adverse effects observed and reported in this
`study were:
`
`r Abnormal liver function tests in 25.5% of the
`ketoconazole-treated group (n = 51) and 30.6%
`of the control group (n = 49);
`r Transient elevation of hepatic transaminases,
`which was associated with high blood
`concentrations
`of
`cyclosporine
`and
`normalized with dose adjustment (4 patients
`in the ketoconazole-treated group);
`
`4
`
`

`

`Outeiro et al
`
`1207
`
`Table 1. All Studies With Reported ALT and AST Values in Ketoconazole Drug Interaction Studies
`
`Author, Year
`
`Number of Participants
`
`ALT (U/L)
`
`AST (U/L)
`
`Engels, Mathot, Loos, van
`Schaik, Verweij, 200638
`
`7 (cancer patients)
`
`Xu et al, 201539
`
`22 (healthy volunteers)
`
`Kovarik, Huang, Slade, Sfikas,
`Chandler, 200940
`
`17 (healthy volunteers)
`
`Lee et al, 199541
`
`13 (cancer patients)
`
`Tham et al, 200642
`
`29 (cancer patients)
`
`Baseline
`20 U/L
`No mention during or after the study
`1 subject ࣘ 144 U/L
`Decreased once ketoconazole was
`stopped
`1 subject 74 U/L (normal range, 3–60
`U/L)
`2 months after the study, 18 U/L
`
`Baseline
`25 U/L
`No mention during or after the study
`–
`
`–
`
`1 subject 479 IU/mL
`On day 20 of treatment with
`ketoconazole
`Average data
`Control, 21 U/L
`Ketoconazole, 29 U/L
`
`1 subject 535 IU/mL
`On day 20 of treatment with
`ketoconazole
`Average data
`Control 33 U/L
`Ketoconazole 34 U/L
`
`r Persistent mildly increased bilirubin concentra-
`tions and serum transaminase activity (n = 2
`patients);
`r 5 Patients were withdrawn from therapy be-
`cause of viral hepatitis;
`r 16 Patients discontinued ketoconazole ther-
`apy at different times (6–72 months) for rea-
`sons including hepatic dysfunction (n = 5),
`antituberculostatic drugs (n = 4), pregnancy
`(n = 5), noncompliance with immunosuppres-
`sive medication (n = 1), and development of
`cancer (n = 1).22
`
`The highest cumulative ketoconazole dose admin-
`istered to patients with hormone-refractory prostate
`cancer was 1296 g over a period of 1440 days.23 In
`this study 38 patients received ketoconazole 300 mg
`3 times daily together with 30 mg of hydrocorti-
`sone. The duration of treatment varied between 3 and
`48 months, and the median was 6 months. The following
`adverse effects were reported: nausea (13.2%), fatigue
`(10.6%), diarrhea (2.6%), visual disturbance (2.6%),
`and abnormal liver function tests (2.6%; ALT and AST
`activity values not provided), and 6 patients (15.8%)
`were reported to have discontinued ketoconazole ther-
`apy because of “intolerable adverse effects.”23 At the
`end of the study 12 patients were reported to survive
`(the median age was approximately 73 years).
`Allergic reactions after a single oral dose of ke-
`toconazole have been reported.24 A female patient
`with dermatomycosis of the breasts was prescribed
`ketoconazole, and according to the patient, she had
`not previously experienced an allergic reaction except
`for contact dermatitis to miconazole. Shortly (45 min-
`utes) after administration of ketoconazole, the patient
`reported being dizzy and collapsed several
`times.
`
`During the examination severe angioedema and pro-
`nounced erythema of the face, hands, and feet were
`found. After sufficient supportive treatment all symp-
`toms resolved the next day.24 A male patient also
`received a single dose of ketoconazole (200 mg). He
`also had not previously experienced an allergic re-
`action to ketoconazole and reported not currently
`taking other medication. After 30 minutes the patient
`reported swelling of the hands and feet and itching.
`Clinical examination revealed severe angioedema of the
`face, hands, and feet. Gastrointestinal complaints and
`pronounced dyspnea were also present but gradually
`resolved. After supportive treatment the patient recov-
`ered within 2 hours.24
`From the 55 articles analyzed, only 4 actually re-
`ported ALT and AST values, 4 articles reported ALT
`values only (Table 2), 18 articles described abnor-
`mal liver function tests without providing any values,
`11 studies reported no changes in hepatic function, and
`18 articles did not mention hepatic function.
`Two articles reported ALT and AST activity at the
`beginning of ketoconazole treatment and reported no
`changes throughout the 2 years of follow-up.25,26
`
`Discussion
`According to a report from the FDA, ketoconazole
`should not be used in drug interaction studies because
`the typical dosage (200–400 mg daily for 5 days) has
`been associated with liver injury.9 The decision of
`the FDA was based on data from the FDA Adverse
`Event Reporting System (FAERS), which is not easily
`accessible to the public, and epidemiological data of
`the General Practice Research Database from 1999,27 in
`which 2 of 1052 patients with prescribed ketoconazole
`reported drug-induced liver injury (nonfatal outcome).
`
`5
`
`

`

`1208
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology / Vol 56 No 10 2016
`
`Table 2. All Studies With Reported ALT and AST Values in Patients During Ketoconazole Treatment (Only Average Values)
`
`Author, Year
`
`Lewis et al, 19843
`
`Study Design
`
`Number of Participants
`
`ALT (U/L)
`
`AST (U/L)
`
`Literature review (33
`cases)
`
`33 (patients)
`
`Range, 70 to >2000 Average, 613
`Duration of treatment 1–69 days
`
`Range 50 to >2000
`Average, 594
`Duration of treatment,
`1–69 days
`
`–
`
`–
`
`At the start of the
`study
`Ketoconazole, 19.20
`Control, 20.29
`–
`
`Ketoconazole, 21.31
`Control, 21.14
`–
`
`Average data, 21
`
`Sobh et al, 200143
`
`Clinical study
`
`El-Agroudy et al, 200422
`
`Clinical study
`
`100 (kidney transplant
`patients)
`100 (kidney transplant
`patients)
`
`El-Dahshan, Bakr, Donia,
`Badr Ael, Sobh, 200625
`
`Clinical study
`
`70 (kidney transplant
`patients)
`
`Chien, Yang, Lin, Liaw,
`199744
`
`Clinical study
`
`137 (onychomycosis
`patients)
`
`El-Dahshan, Bakr, Donia,
`Badr Ael, Sobh, 200445
`Heiberg and Svejgaard,
`198146
`Soltero, Carbajal,
`Rodriguez-Montalvo,
`Valdes, 200326
`
`Clinical study
`
`Case report
`
`Clinical study
`
`70 (kidney transplant
`patients)
`1 (dermathophytosis
`patient)
`11 (kidney transplant
`patients)
`
`Ketoconazole, 21.6
`Control, 24.9
`Ketoconazole
`Baseline, 22
`6 months, 25
`12 months, 21
`10 year, 29
`Control
`Baseline, 23
`6 months, 30
`12 months, 24
`10 years, 33
`At the start of the study
`Ketoconazole, 21.31
`Control, 21.14
`
`Ketoconazole complete follow-up
`before, 13.4
`after, 19.1
`Ketoconazole incomplete follow-up
`before, 14.9
`after, 6.5
`Ketoconazole, 19.2
`Control, 20.29
`90 days, 290
`250 days, 250
`Average data, 32
`
`A recent evaluation of the FAERS database between
`2004 and 2011 (identified 1964 cases of liver injury with
`112 acute liver failure) showed that all systemic an-
`timycotics (not just ketoconazole) have been associated
`with a clinically significant risk of DILI when polyphar-
`macy and comorbidities are present.28 An analysis of
`the Kaiser Permanente Northern California database
`between 2004 and 2010 identified a similar absolute
`risk and comparable rates for ALT activity elevation
`> 200 U/L and severe acute liver injury in people receiv-
`ing fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole.29 Both
`risks are increased with voriconazole and posaconazole,
`possibly because of the more seriously ill underlying
`patient population, although the number of users of
`these drugs are relatively small.29 It was also reported
`in a review of published evidence from epidemiologic
`studies of liver injury associated with the use of keto-
`conazole, that there is no known report on severe liver
`injury in healthy volunteers who participated in drug
`interaction studies with ketoconazole.30
`In the studies analyzed in this investigation in which
`ketoconazole was used as an antifungal drug, treatment
`
`duration was relatively long (median, 276 days; approx-
`imately 9 months of administration at daily doses of
`200–400 mg; 4815 patients), but there were no clinically
`significant findings indicating a higher risk of hepatic
`injury in patients receiving ketoconazole (26 articles
`reported changes in liver function tests, and 28 reported
`no changes or did not describe this adverse effect). Four
`studies reported fatal cases because of ketoconazole.
`In the first report the patient was reported to be
`taking ketoconazole for 66 days at a dose of 200 mg
`daily coadministrated with hydrochlorothiazide, cotri-
`moxazole, and isosorbide dinitrate, and 10 days after
`discontinuation of ketoconazole the patient died. In
`this case the liver biopsy identified massive hepatic
`necrosis.3 In a second case report, 2 patients who
`received ketoconazole (200 mg/day) for 103 and 17 days,
`both died.31 In these cases no other medication was
`being taken, and the liver biopsy showed centrilobular
`necrosis in both cases.31 The third study was a literature
`review, and these authors reported 3 fatal cases that
`were considered drug related. In the first of these
`fatal cases, the patient was reported to be receiving
`
`6
`
`

`

`Outeiro et al
`
`1209
`
`ketoconazole 400 mg daily (but no details on the dura-
`tion of treatment); a biopsy showed severe hepatitis.32
`The second patient was reported to be taking keto-
`conazole 200 mg daily and also received drug treatment
`for a cardiac disease. Necrosis was not evident in
`the liver biopsy performed for this patient.32 In the
`third fatal case the person was reported to be taking
`ketoconazole 400 mg daily for 28 days; after 8 weeks
`the patient developed malaise and then jaundice. Liver
`function tests suggested liver damage, and 5 weeks
`after onset of jaundice the patient died from hepatic
`failure. There was no description of any concomitant
`medication.32 In their study Kao et al described DILI
`occurring in 28 of 57 321 patients receiving ketocona-
`zole; 1 patient who was also receiving fluconazole at the
`time died. The duration of administration was around
`90 days.33
`In 2 of these fatal cases, the role of ketoconazole as
`a contributing factor cannot be established.
`In the drug interaction studies involving 2355 partic-
`ipants (healthy volunteers and patients), 40 participants
`were reported to have increased liver transaminase ac-
`tivity (1.7%), and no deaths were reported or associated
`with ketoconazole. In the recently published analysis
`of drug interaction studies between 2005 and 2015,
`53 studies involving 971 participants exposed to sys-
`temic ketoconazole revealed evidence of ketoconazole-
`associated hepatic injury in 0.41% of participants.11
`In the studies in which patients were treated with
`ketoconazole for a longer period compared with the
`drug interaction studies, 8.7% showed elevated liver
`function tests. However, median treatment duration
`was 276 days. In contrast, the frequency of DILI in
`2 epidemiological studies with ketoconazole was low
`(2:105227 and 4.9:10 00033). The majority of patients
`received treatment with ketoconazole for less than 30
`days,27 with an average of 90 days.33 More importantly,
`the rate of DILI was low in drug interaction studies
`in which ketoconazole was administered for a short
`duration only (5 to 7 days). In the 161 studies analyzed,
`the rate of DILI was 1.7%, and there were no clinically
`significant changes in other laboratory values reported.
`There are 3 possible alternatives to ketoconazole
`discussed as a strong reference inhibitor of CYP3A4
`for drug interaction studies: clarithromycin, ritonavir,
`itraconazole.12,34,35
`Clarithromycin-mediated
`and
`CYP3A inhibition is weaker
`than ketoconazole-
`mediated inhibition; itraconazole has a long half-life,
`an active metabolite that shares the parent drug’s
`CYP3A-inhibitory properties and therefore needs
`at least 3 days of preexposure in drug interaction
`studies.34,35 According to Greenblatt, ritonavir is
`preferable to itraconazole in drug interaction studies;
`however,
`in this consideration the role of
`safety
`aspects was not clearly discussed.13,35 Regarding
`
`drug-induced liver injury, itraconazole poses the same
`risk as ketoconazole according to epidemiological
`data.28,29 Still none of
`these alternative inhibitor
`drugs can achieve the same strong inhibition as
`ketoconazole because each inhibitor has a unique
`transporter
`inhibition profile, and none of
`the
`alternative drugs provide a clean inhibition profile,
`as seen with ketoconazole.34 The majority of
`the
`alternative inhibitors are not fit for the purpose in
`exploratory drug interaction studies,34 as each of these
`alternative drugs has also been implicated in causing
`hepatic injury and other serious adverse effects.30
`For instance, itraconazole induced mild to transient
`elevation in liver enzyme activity.12 For ritonavir in
`therapeutic doses there are reports of hepatotoxicity,
`pancreatitis, and lipid disorders,36 but according
`to Greenblatt and Harmatz, in low doses (100 mg
`twice
`daily)
`ritonavir
`presents
`no
`clinically
`significant problems.13 A challenge with the use
`of clarithromycin as a prototype inhibitor is that it
`requires too many doses to achieve the necessary extent
`of inhibition.36 Furthermore, in a population-based
`nested case-control study using heath care data, the
`incidence of acute liver injury of 3.95 per 100 000
`exposures was reported for clarithromycin.37 One third
`of the cases in this study were reported to occur within
`4 days of commencing clarithromycin treatment.37
`All drugs currently considered as an alternative to
`ketoconazole in drug interaction studies carry the risk
`of acute liver injury. This risk appears to be similar
`for all these drugs including ketoconazole based on
`current information. Finally, Ke et al concluded that
`the “potential risks to DDI study subjects are low
`and manageable”36
`for
`clarithromycin-associated
`and itraconazole-associated hepatotoxicity. A logical
`conclusion of these statements is that the same low
`risk must be concluded for ketoconazole. Whether low-
`dose ritonavir poses a similar risk to healthy volunteers
`remains to be seen, but it might be a favorable option.
`A limitation of the present investigation is that
`our search strategy may not have identified all articles
`that investigated ketoconazole in drug interaction or
`antifungal treatment studies. Furthermore, the authors
`did not have full access to all the articles, and the
`abstracts do not always provide adequate information.
`Despite these limitations, the number of articles/studies
`including the present analysis is large, and we assume
`that there will be no major changes in the rate of
`DILI. Especially in the older interaction studies from
`the 1980s or 1990s it was not standard to report
`safety results in the publication. Therefore, we cannot
`be certain that liver injury was actually looked for
`in these studies because of underreporting. The rate
`of ketoconazole-associated liver injury was estimated
`to be 0.41% in the drug interaction studies between
`
`7
`
`

`

`1210
`
`The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology / Vol 56 No 10 2016
`
`2005 and 2015,11 showing the safety of ketoconazole in
`drug interaction studies conducted according to today’s
`standards. Drug interaction studies are not specially
`designed to capture elaborate safety data. However,
`at least in recent years there has also been increasing
`awareness of drug safety and toxicity in drug interac-
`tion studies, as legal authorities and ethics committees
`require more frequent safety assessments throughout
`clinical studies. For future studies it should also be a
`requirement for publication to have a safety paragraph
`included in which details about the frequency of safety
`assessments and the resulting ADRs must be presented.
`
`Conclusions
`Based on the data from more than 2000 healthy vol-
`unteers enrolled in DDI studies, the risk of hepatic in-
`jury from exposure to ketoconazole during short-term
`administration is estimated to be very low. Therefore,
`ketoconazole should continue to be used as a CYP3A
`index inhibitor in drug interaction studies in healthy
`volunteers. The use of other inhibitors will probably
`not reduce the already low frequency of elevated liver
`enzymes caused by short-term ketoconazole or might
`come with other safety issues.
`
`Acknowledgments
`We thank Prof. Andrew McLachlan for review and editing the
`English-language style.
`
`Declaration of Conflicting Interests
`None to declare.
`
`References
`1. Allen D, Wilson D, Drew R, Perfect J. Azole antifungals: 35
`years of invasive fungal infection management. Expert review of
`anti-infective therapy. 2015;13(6):787–798.
`2. Greenblatt DJ. The ketoconazole legacy. Clin Pharmacol Drug
`Dev. 2014;3(1):1–3.
`3. Lewis JH, Zimmerman HJ, Benson GD, Ishak KG. Hepatic
`injury associated with ketoconazole therapy. Analysis of 33
`cases. Gastroenterology. 1984;86(3):503–513.
`4. Hay RJ. Ketoconazole: a reappraisal. Br Med J. 1985;290
`(6464):260–261.
`5. European Commission. Ketoconazole HRA 200 mg tablets.
`2014.
`http://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-
`register/2014/20141119130013/anx 130013 en.pdf.
`Accessed
`June 29, 2016.
`6. FDA US. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA limits
`usage of Nizoral (ketoconazole) oral tablets due to poten-
`tially fatal
`liver injury and risk of drug interactions and
`adrenal gland problems. 2013. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/
`Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM362444.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2015.
`7. Comte-Perret S, Zanchi A, Gomez F. Long-term low-dose
`ketoconazole treatment in bilateral macronodular adrenal hyper-
`plasia. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2014;2014:140083.
`8. EMA. Suspension of marketing authorisations
`for oral
`ketoconazole

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket