throbber
European Journal of Endocrinology (2009) 160 1003–1010
`
`ISSN 0804-4643
`
`CLINICAL STUDY
`Merits and pitfalls of mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome
`F Castinetti, M Fassnacht1, S Johanssen1, M Terzolo2, P Bouchard3, P Chanson4, C Do Cao5, I Morange, A Pico´ 6,
`S Ouzounian3, J Young4, S Hahner1, T Brue, B Allolio1 and B Conte-Devolx
`Service d’Endocrinologie, diabe`te et maladies me´taboliques, et Centre de reference des maladies rares d’origine hypophysaires DEFHY, Hoˆpital de la Timone,
`Marseille 13005, France, 1Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Wu¨rzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse
`2, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany, 2Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Medicina Interna I, Orbassano 10043, Italy, 3Service d’Endocrinologie,
`Hoˆpital Saint-Antoine, 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, FR-75571 Paris Cedex 12, France, 4Assistance Publique-Hoˆpitaux de Paris, Service
`d’Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Hoˆpital de Biceˆtre, and Universite´ Paris Sud 11, and INSERM U693, F-94275 Le Kremlin-Biceˆtre,
`France, 5Clinique Endocrinologique Marc Linquette, CHU, 59037 Lille-Cedex, France and 6Servicio de Endocrinologı´a y Nutricio´n, Hospital General
`Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
`
`(Correspondence should be addressed to F Castinetti who is now at Laboratory of Dr Sally Camper, Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan,
`4109 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; Email: fredcast@umich.edu)
`
`Abstract
`
`Objective: Mifepristone is the only available glucocorticoid receptor antagonist. Only few adult patients
`with hypercortisolism were treated to date by this drug. Our objective was to determine effectiveness
`and tolerability of mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome (CS).
`Design: Retrospective study of patients treated in seven European centers.
`Methods: Twenty patients with malignant (nZ15, 12 with adrenocortical carcinoma, three with
`ectopic ACTH secretion) or benign (nZ5, four with Cushing’s disease, one with bilateral adrenal
`hyperplasia) CS were treated with mifepristone. Mifepristone was initiated with a median starting dose
`of 400 mg/day (200–1000). Median treatment duration was 2 months (0.25–21) for malignant CS,
`and 6 months (0.5–24) for benign CS. Clinical (signs of hypercortisolism, blood pressure, signs of
`adrenal insufficiency), and biochemical parameters (serum potassium and glucose) were evaluated.
`Results: Treatment was stopped in one patient after 1 week due to severe uncontrolled hypokalemia.
`Improvement of clinical signs was observed in 11/15 patients with malignant CS (73%), and 4/5
`patients with benign CS (80%). Psychiatric symptoms improved in 4/5 patients within the first week.
`Blood glucose levels improved in 4/7 patients. Signs of adrenal insufficiency were observed in 3/20
`patients. Moderate to severe hypokalemia was observed in 11/20 patients and increased blood pressure
`levels in 3/20 patients.
`Conclusion: Mifepristone is a rapidly effective treatment of hypercortisolism, but requires close
`monitoring of potentially severe hypokalemia, hypertension, and clinical signs of adrenal insufficiency.
`Mifepristone provides a valuable treatment option in patients with severe CS when surgery is
`unsuccessful or impossible.
`
`European Journal of Endocrinology 160 1003–1010
`
`Introduction
`
`Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is a rare but serious disease
`with significant morbidity and mortality due to
`cardiovascular, metabolic, and infectious complications
`(1, 2). Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of
`choice for Cushing’s disease (CD) and is usually followed
`by pituitary irradiation or by bilateral adrenalectomy if
`surgery has failed (3). In malignant CS, surgery remains
`the first-line treatment in adrenocortical carcinoma
`(ACC) and ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) while
`chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are reserved for
`advanced disease (4, 5). Medical management of
`hypercortisolism can thus be used in four circum-
`stances: during the period required for localization of
`the ACTH source, in preparation for surgery, following
`
`radiation therapy to bridge its delayed efficacy or in
`metastatic disease as part of a multimodal approach.
`Several drugs have been advocated, each having
`advantages and drawbacks. For example, o,p0-dichloro-
`diphenildichloroethane is effective in controlling cortisol
`excess in about 50–80% of cases, and also has
`antitumoral effects due to its adrenolytic activity (6).
`However, maximum efficacy is delayed and the drug is
`frequently poorly tolerated due to a narrow therapeutic
`window (7, 8). Other drugs like ketoconazole or
`metyrapone may act more rapidly but are often only
`partially effective and associated with significant
`adverse events (e.g., serious hepatotoxicity, hyperten-
`sion or hypokalemia)
`(9, 10).
`In cases of drug
`intolerance or unresponsitivity, an alternative medical
`treatment should be useful.
`
`q 2009 European Society of Endocrinology
`
`DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0098
`Online version via www.eje-online.org
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`1
`
`TEVA1021
`
`

`

`1004
`
`F Castinetti and others
`
`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Mifepristone is the first and only available glucocorti-
`coid receptor antagonist (11, 12). It was discovered in
`the early 1980’s (13), but due to its strong antiprogestin
`activity it has mainly been used as a contragestive pill.
`Owing to the controversy related to this use of
`mifepristone,
`there is presently limited experience
`concerning the use of mifepristone in hypercortisolism.
`To date only 21 patients (including two children) were
`reported to have been treated with mifepristone, mostly
`for short periods (14–19). Most of these cases were
`published as case reports, except for one study including
`10 patients (20). However, four of these patients were
`treated for !10 days due to adverse effects, although
`these adverse events may have been unrelated to
`mifepristone therapy. Moreover, only 12 patients were
`treated with mifepristone for CS for more than 2 weeks.
`All of these patients showed rapid regression of clinical
`signs of cortisol excess suggesting that mifepristone
`could become a valuable treatment option in poorly
`controlled hypercortisolism. Adverse events included
`nausea and fatigue, which could be attributed to
`adrenal insufficiency in three cases. These scarce data
`also drew attention to the limitations of biochemical
`parameters for follow-up as the blockade of glucocorti-
`coid receptors by mifepristone may lead to variable
`increase in plasma ACTH and consequently cortisol
`concentrations (12, 16). Thus, the diagnosis of both
`persistent hypercortisolism and adrenal insufficiency is
`difficult and largely based on clinical assessment and
`close follow-up.
`Owing to the lack of sufficient clinical data on
`mifepristone in cases of glucocorticoid excess, we
`decided to evaluate retrospectively the use of mifepris-
`tone as a treatment of CS in seven European centers.
`We report here the results of mifepristone therapy in
`20 patients. Owing to the various etiologies of CS,
`we divided this group into malignant and benign CS.
`We tried to define the efficacy and adverse events of
`mifepristone to better define the potential role of this
`drug in endogenous glucocorticoid excess.
`
`Patients and methods
`
`We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and
`tolerability of mifepristone. We included in our study
`20 patients with CS who had been treated with
`mifepristone (Mifegyne, Exelgyn Laboratories, Paris,
`France; Mifepristone, HRA Pharma, Paris, France).
`These patients were followed in seven European
`nZ4, Paris
`nZ1,
`centers:
`France
`(Marseille
`Le Kremlin-Bicetre nZ2, Lille nZ1), Germany (Wu¨ rzburg,
`nZ9), Italy (Orbassano nZ2), and Spain (Alicante,
`nZ1). Mifepristone was used on a compassionate basis
`after all patients had given their written informed
`consent; they had previously received detailed infor-
`mation on the potential side effects and benefits of
`mifepristone. Patient charts were retrospectively
`
`www.eje-online.org
`
`analyzed in detail for changes in clinical status, adverse
`events, and changes in standard biochemical and
`hormonal parameters.
`The diagnosis of CS was based on the combination of
`clinical features of hypercortisolism and biochemical
`assessment according to recommended guidelines (21).
`The study population comprised 13 females (including
`five post-menopausal women) and seven males, with a
`mean age of 48.5 years (range 20–63) at the time of
`diagnosis of CS (Table 1). None of them presented cyclic
`CS. Mifepristone was initiated due to the lack of efficacy
`(nZ6) or limited tolerance (e.g. hepatotoxicity) (nZ7)
`of previous medical
`treatments,
`increase in liver
`enzymes due to metastatic disease leading to contra-
`indication for adrenostatic drugs (nZ3) or as additional
`symptomatic therapy in combination with metyrapone
`or etomidate (nZ2). In these two patients, metyrapone
`and etomidate were considered as only partially
`effective, and the dose was not modified during
`mifepristone treatment. In addition, mifepristone was
`given to two patients with CD as first adjunctive
`treatment after unsuccessful transsphenoidal surgery
`(nZ2). All patients had undergone complete clinical
`and hormonal evaluation prior to mifepristone treat-
`ment. In all centers, efficacy and adverse events of
`mifepristone were assessed every 15–30 days by careful
`clinical evaluation (clinical signs of hypercortisolism,
`psychiatric symptoms, clinical signs, and symptoms
`suggestive of adrenal
`insufficiency, blood pressure)
`or earlier if justified by the patient’s condition. Every
`15–30 days biochemical follow-up included control of
`serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, and kidney function.
`In diabetic patients, frequent glycemic controls were
`performed with modification of diabetes treatment, if
`necessary. TSH levels were measured after 3–6 months
`of
`treatment or in case of clinical evidence of
`hypothyroidism, as one case of Hashimoto thyroiditis
`has been described previously during mifepristone
`therapy (20). Random samples of ACTH and serum
`cortisol concentrations were taken in monthly intervals
`(during outpatient visits). Owing to its antiprogestin
`effects, mifepristone has been reported to induce
`endometrial hyperplasia (22). Accordingly, transvaginal
`ultrasound examination was performed in a patient of
`our series treated for 18 months, as previously
`recommended. All adverse events occurring during
`treatment were recorded with special attention to the
`problems of adrenal insufficiency and hypokalemia.
`
`Results
`
`the 20 patients treated with
`Individual data of
`mifepristone for CS are given in Table 1. Mifepristone
`was initiated at a median dose of 400 mg/day (range
`200–1000). The initial dose was decided by each
`investigator and varied with the severity of clinical
`signs of hypercortisolism. The median maximal dose
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`2
`
`

`

`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome
`
`1005
`
`Table 1 Individual data of the 20 patients treated by mifepristone.
`
`Etiology
`
`Sex/age
`
`Surgery
`
`Anticortisolic drugs
`
`Clin. signs Psy. signs Hypertension HypoK
`
`Diab.
`
`Previous treatments
`
`Pre-mifepristone
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`
`ACC
`
`EAS
`
`CD
`
`BAH
`
`M/63
`F/39
`F/52
`F/52
`F/45
`F/63
`M/20
`F/47
`F/38
`F/44
`M/64
`M/52
`M/55
`F/43
`F/38
`M/45
`M/56
`F/50
`F/45
`F/52
`
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`Y
`Y
`Y
`N
`N
`N
`
`Mitotane
`Mitotane
`Mitotane
`Mitotane
`Mitotane, ketoconazole
`Mitotane, ketoconazole
`Mitotane, ketoconazole
`Mitotane, ketoconazole
`Mitotane, metyrapone
`Mitotane, metyrapone
`Mitotane, metyrapone
`Mitotane, etomidate
`Etomidate, metyrapone
`Ketoconazole
`Ketoconazole
`Ketoconazole
`Ketoconazole
`None
`None
`Ketoconazole
`
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`K
`C
`K
`K
`K
`C
`K
`K
`
`C
`C
`C
`C
`K
`C
`C
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`
`C
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`C
`C
`C
`K
`K
`C
`K
`C
`
`C
`K
`K
`C
`K
`K
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`C
`C
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`C
`
`Etiology: ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; CD, Cushing’s disease; BAH, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia; EAS, ectopic ACTH secretion. Sex/age: F, female;
`M, male; age in years. Previous treatment: surgery, Y when surgery was performed before mifeptsotone, N when no surgery was performed. Pre-mifepristone,
`clinical or biochemical signs before mifepristone treatment; clin. signs, clinical signs of hypercortisolism (hirsutism, bruising, facial fullness, edema, truncal
`obesity); psy. signs, psychiatric signs or cognitive deficit; hypertension, high blood pressure level (O140/90 mmHg); hypoK, low serum potassium level
`(!3.5 mmol/l); diab., diabetes; for each criterion, C is marked when the criterion was reported, K when the criterion was absent.
`
`during the treatment was 600 mg/day (400–2000).
`The maximal dose was decided by each investigator
`according to clinical efficacy and tolerance (mainly
`blood potassium level, signs of adrenal insufficiency).
`The median duration of treatment was 2.5 months
`(5 days to 24 months). Efficacy and adverse events of the
`treatment are reported in Table 2.
`
`Mifepristone in malignant CS
`
`Effectiveness and adverse events in patients with
`ACC Twelve patients received mifepristone for advanced
`ACC. Nine of them were treated unsuccessfully by
`surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and/or mitotane,
`two were treated by chemotherapy and mitotane only,
`and one received only mitotane for a few days, which
`was then stopped due to a sharp increase in liver
`enzymes (patient no. 12, Table 1). Anticortisolic drugs
`including ketoconazole (nZ4), metyrapone (nZ3) or
`etomidate (case no. 12), had been used without sufficient
`response or were stopped due to poor tolerance. The
`median starting dose of mifepristone was 400 mg/day
`(200–1000 mg) with a median maximal dose of
`600 mg/day (400–2000) and a median duration of
`treatment of 2 months (5 days to 6 months).
`In eight patients (66%),
`the clinical signs of
`hypercortisolism improved rapidly within the first
`month. In these cases, both patient and attending
`physician judged the treatment as success. However, in
`most cases symptoms did not disappear completely.
`
`Psychiatric symptoms improved within the first week in
`one of
`two affected patients and blood pressure
`decreased in four of seven patients with hypertension
`(57%). Cessation of insulin treatment and switch to
`oral drugs was possible in one out of four patients
`with diabetes mellitus. In three out of four patients with
`low serum potassium prior to mifepristone, hypokale-
`mia worsened during mifepristone treatment requiring
`high doses of supplemental potassium (up to 16 g/day),
`spironolactone (up to 100 mg/day), and, in case no. 12,
`cessation of mifepristone within 1 week of treatment.
`In patient no. 1, low serum potassium concentrations
`remained unchanged during mifepristone. Three other
`patients presenting initially with normal serum
`potassium concentrations developed moderate to severe
`hypokalemia during treatment with mifepristone. Thus,
`7 out of 12 patients (58.3%) experienced significant
`problems with serum potassium during mifepristone
`treatment.
`Mifepristone treatment was stopped due to death or
`tumor progression (nZ8),
`lack of significant benefit
`(nZ2), and uncontrolled severe hypokalemia (nZ1).
`None of the patients died because of adverse effects
`of mifepristone. Patient no. 9 is still on treatment after
`3 months with clinical signs of hypercortisolism
`improved despite tumor progression.
`
`Effectiveness and adverse events in patients with
`EAS A total of
`three patients were treated with
`mifepristone for metastatic EAS (thymic carcinoma
`nZ1, small cell
`lung cancer nZ2). All had been
`
`www.eje-online.org
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`3
`
`

`

`1006
`
`F Castinetti and others
`
`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Table 2 Efficacy and adverse events of mifepristone in the 20 patients of the series.
`
`Dose
`initial/final
`
`Duration
`(months)
`
`Clin.
`signs
`
`Psy.
`signs
`
`Hypertension HypoK Diab.
`
`Adr.
`Ins.
`
`Reason for cessation of
`mifepristone treatment
`
`During mifepristone treatment
`
`6
`2.5
`3
`3
`1
`2
`1
`2
`3
`2
`1.5
`0.25
`
`1
`2
`18
`12
`24
`0.5
`
`3
`6
`
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`4
`4
`Y
`4
`Y
`Y
`Y
`4
`
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`4
`
`Y
`Y
`
`Y
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`K
`4
`
`K
`Y
`K
`K
`K
`Y
`
`K
`K
`
`Y
`4
`Y
`Y
`K
`4
`Y
`4
`K
`K
`K
`K
`
`Y
`[
`[
`K
`K
`K
`
`[
`K
`
`4
`[
`[
`[
`[
`K
`[
`[
`K
`K
`K
`[
`
`[
`[
`[
`K
`K
`4
`
`[
`4
`
`Y
`K
`K
`4
`K
`K
`4
`K
`K
`K
`K
`4
`
`Y
`Y
`K
`K
`K
`K
`
`K
`Y
`
`[
`[
`
`[
`
`Death (tumor progression)
`Death (tumor progression)
`Death (tumor progression)
`Death (tumor progression)
`No significant benefit
`No significant benefit
`Death (tumor progression)
`Death (tumor progression)
`Ongoing treatment
`Tumor progression
`Death (tumor progression)
`Uncontrolled hypokalemia, cessa-
`tion after 1 week of treatment
`Tumor progression, hypokalemia
`Bilateral adrenalectomy
`Ongoing treatment
`Bilateral adrenalectomy
`Radiosurgical treatment efficacy
`Neurosurgical treatment made
`possible due to psychosis
`improvement
`Ongoing treatment
`Bilateral adrenalectomy
`
`Etiology
`
`ACC
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`
`13 EAS
`14
`15
`16 CD
`17
`18
`
`1000/1000
`400/400
`400/600
`400/600
`400/2000
`600/600
`600/1200
`400/1200
`400/600
`200/600
`200/400
`600/600
`
`400/600
`600/600
`400/800
`400/800
`600/1200
`600/600
`
`19
`20 BAH
`
`600/600
`600/600
`
`Etiology: ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; CD, Cushing’s disease; BAH, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia; EAS, ectopic ACTH secretion. Dose: mg/day. In the
`column « during mifepristone treatment, 4 when the criterion was unchanged, [ if the criterion appeared or was worsened during the treatment, K if the
`criterion was still absent, Y if the criterion decreased or disappeared with the treatment; Adr. Ins., clinical signs during the treatment were evocative of adrenal
`insufficiency (C), or no sign of adrenal insufficiency was present (K); note that patients 2, and 14 presented severe fatigue during the treatment.
`
`unsuccessfully treated by surgery. The median starting
`dose was 400 mg/day (400–600 mg) with a median
`maximal dose of 600 mg/day (600–800 mg), and
`a median duration of
`treatment of
`two months
`(1–21 months). Patient no. 13 was treated concomi-
`tantly with metyrapone, making it difficult to correctly
`interpret the results. Clinical signs of hypercortisolism
`improved in all patients. One patient with severe psychosis
`showed rapid improvement during the first week after
`initiation of mifepristone. Two patients who presented
`with high blood pressure and low serum potassium
`experienced worsening of hypokalemia and hypertension
`during mifepristone treatment and required high doses
`of spironolactone (up to 400 mg/day) and potassium
`supplementation (up to 20 g/day). Severe hypokalemia
`was also observed in the remaining patient who had
`moderately lowered serum potassium prior to therapy.
`In two patients with diabetes mellitus at diagnosis,
`insulin doses could be rapidly decreased allowing good
`glycemic control with reduced insulin doses or a switch
`to oral antidiabetic drugs. Mifepristone was eventually
`stopped due to tumor progression and/or profound
`hypokalemia (nZ2). The third patient (patient no. 15)
`with metastatic thymic carcinoma is still on treatment. In
`this patient, withdrawal of mifepristone after cytotoxic
`chemotherapy worsened clinical signs and symptoms
`of hypercortisolism and, therefore, treatment with
`mifepristone was reinitiated. Presently, she has no
`clinical signs of hypercortisolism. Moderate hypokalemia
`
`and elevated blood pressure levels are well controlled by
`spironolactone and potassium administration after 21
`months of treatment.
`
`Mifepristone in benign CS
`
`Effectiveness and adverse events in patients with CD
`Four patients with CD were treated with mifepristone
`in our centers. Two of them underwent unsuccessful
`transsphenoidal surgery, in one followed by gamma-
`knife radio surgery. The third patient
`(no. 18)
`presented with severe psychosis making surgery
`impossible. The fourth patient
`(no. 19) had no
`pituitary adenoma image on magnetic resonance
`imaging and ketoconazole was poorly tolerated. The
`median starting dose of mifepristone was 600 mg/day
`(300–600 mg), median maximal dose 700 mg/day
`(600–1200), and median duration of treatment was
`9 months (0.5–24 months).
`Clinical signs of hypercortisolism improved rapidly in
`three out of
`four patients (75%). The patient with
`psychosis showed rapid improvement of psychiatric
`symptoms within the first week of treatment. None of
`the patients had hypertension. However, patient no. 19
`developed high blood pressure and severe hypokalemia
`during mifepristone. In one patient (no. 18), low serum
`potassium remained unaffected by the treatment with
`mifepristone. In all patients, ACTH and cortisol levels
`
`www.eje-online.org
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`4
`
`

`

`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome
`
`1007
`
`increased during mifepristone (up to three times of
`pretreatment levels).
`Mifepristone was eventually stopped in three patients
`because of bilateral adrenalectomy (nZ1), eventual
`efficacy of gamma-knife radio surgery (nZ1), and
`neurosurgical treatment after regression of psychosis
`(nZ1). Patient no. 19 is still on treatment six months
`after initiation of mifepristone therapy.
`
`Effectiveness and adverse events in a patient with
`bilateral adrenal hyperplasia This patient was
`treated with mifepristone (600 mg/day) because of
`severe clinical signs of hypercortisolism, intolerance to
`ketoconazole, and refusal of bilateral adrenalectomy.
`Signs of hypercortisolism and hypertension improved
`progressively during the first three months of treatment.
`Hypokalemia was present before initiation of mifepris-
`tone and remained unchanged during treatment.
`Metformin treatment could be stopped after one
`month of treatment, and HbA1c decreased from 7.1 to
`6.4% after six months of mifepristone. Eventually, the
`patient underwent bilateral adrenalectomy after six
`months of treatment with mifepristone.
`
`Adrenal insufficiency during mifepristone
`treatment
`
`Three of our 20 patients presented clinical signs
`suggestive of adrenal
`insufficiency (fatigue, nausea,
`and vomiting). All were treated by dexamethasone
`followed by a reduction of mifepristone dose to 50% of
`the last dosage prior to adrenal insufficiency. Patients
`received 1 mg dexamethasone/400 mg mifepristone as
`recommended previously (23). Two patients reported
`extreme fatigue, but no other clinical signs of adrenal
`deficiency (patients nos 3 and 14). Their treatment was
`not modified.
`
`Other potential adverse effects of mifepristone
`
`One non-diabetic patient had a transient episode of
`hypoglycemia. No increase in liver enzymes or altera-
`tions in thyroid function or kidney function was
`observed in relation to mifepristone treatment. In the
`female patient (patient no. 15) who received mifepris-
`tone for 18 months, no endometrial hyperplasia was
`observed.
`
`Discussion
`
`The antiglucocorticoid activity of mifepristone is well
`established in vitro (14). However, in long-term studies
`mifepristone has been mainly used as an anti-progestin
`in meningioma, myoma or other progesterone-
`dependent diseases
`(24, 25).
`It
`is used as an
`antiglucocorticoid in patients with hypercortisolism
`
`and was hampered by the controversy related to its
`use for inducing abortion leading to legal restrictions in
`several countries. Accordingly, as shown in Table 3,
`only 21 patients (including two children) have been
`treated by mifepristone for CS (14, 15, 17, 20, 22,
`26–29). Thus, our study of 20 patients doubles the
`database of mifepristone treatment for CS and, there-
`fore, allows a better appreciation of its effectiveness and
`adverse effects.
`Our study clearly indicates that mifepristone has
`significant potential
`to improve clinical signs and
`symptoms related to CS. Of note, all four patients not
`benefitting from mifepristone suffered from very
`advanced ACC (the fifth patient, who presented rapid
`regression of psychosis signs, was only treated for
`15 days). In general, most of our patients were heavily
`pretreated and, in most cases, anticortisolic drugs had
`failed to control CS or were not tolerated. An important
`advantage of mifepristone is the rapid onset of its action
`making it especially helpful for patients presenting with
`psychosis. In three out of four patients, psychosis signs
`indeed disappeared within one week of therapy.
`Our study highlights two main challenges in the
`treatment of patients with CS with mifepristone:
`hypokalemia and adrenal insufficiency. In our study,
`55% patients presented relevant hypokalemia. The
`percentage of hypokalemia in our study is higher than
`the 20% previously reported (16). In CS, hypokalemia is
`directly related to glucocorticoid excess as massive
`hypercortisolemia leads to incomplete renal
`inacti-
`vation of cortisol by 11-b-dehydrogenase, and hence
`mineralocorticoid excess (30). As mifepristone blocks
`only glucocorticoid action,
`the mineralocorticoid
`activity of cortisol excess is not affected by mifepristone
`treatment,
`thus leading to hypokalemia. On the
`contrary, mifepristone may lead to an increase of
`plasma ACTH and consecutively of cortisol levels in
`some patients with CS, particularly with CD due to
`alterations in negative feedback. Other mechanisms
`that probably contributed to the higher incidence of
`hypokalemia in our study may be related to the fact that
`in many patients adrenostatic therapy was stopped prior
`to mifepristone treatment because of drug intolerance.
`Thus, in these patients, increase in cortisol concen-
`trations could be related to cessation of adrenostatic
`therapy or tumor progression, leading to hypercortiso-
`lism and severe hypokalemia. Furthermore, even if this
`mechanism seems less likely, it has been shown that
`progesterone acts as an anti-mineralocorticoid and the
`antiprogestin activity of mifepristone may have reduced
`this anti-mineralocorticoid action of endogenous pro-
`gesterone further enhancing mineralocorticoid excess
`(31). In many of our cases, profound hypokalemia was
`thus probably multifactorial. However, the fact that
`severe hypokalemia was observed even with the use of
`spironolactone and potassium supplementation draws
`attention on the fact that hypokalemia may become
`a treatment limiting side-effect of mifepristone, mainly
`
`www.eje-online.org
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`5
`
`

`

`1008
`
`F Castinetti and others
`
`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Table 3 Efficacy and adverse effects of mifepristone in the 21 patients of the literature.
`
`Sex/age Etiology
`
`Dose
`
`Duration
`
`Clinical
`improvement Adverse effects
`
`References
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`
`18
`19
`20
`21
`
`F/45
`F/32
`F/NA
`
`M/62
`M/43
`
`ACC
`ACC
`ACC
`
`ACC
`ACC
`
`5–22 mg/kg
`400
`30–20 mg/kg
`
`400
`800–400
`
`M/36
`
`EAS
`
`5–22 mg/kg
`
`M/42
`F/63
`F/55
`F/46
`M/25
`F/2
`F/43
`F/38
`F/38
`M/51
`F/14
`
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`EAS
`AA
`CD
`NCS
`
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`5–22 mg/kg
`5–22 mg/kg
`5–22 mg/kg
`800–1600
`5–20 mg/kg
`25–100 thrice/day
`600
`800
`5–22 mg/kg
`400–2000
`400
`
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`2
`2
`4
`
`9
`0.5
`
`10
`
`12
`4
`2.25
`0.3
`2.25
`2
`2
`10
`1.5
`18
`8
`
`!1
`!1
`!1
`!1
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`Yes
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`NE
`NE
`NE
`NE
`
`Vaginal bleeding, hypoglycemia,
`water retention
`
`Hypoglycemic episodes, increase in
`eosinophils
`Hashimoto thyroiditis, gynecomastia,
`impotence, inhibition of cortisol
`synthesis
`Nausea, gynecomastia
`Adrenal insufficiency
`
`Hypokalemia, myelemia
`
`Nausea
`Severe hypokaliemia, adrenal crisis
`Endometrial hyperplasia, transient
`rash, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis
`Hypotension
`Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
`Severe nausea, prostration
`Nausea, inhibition of cortisol
`synthesis
`
`(20)
`(29)
`(18)
`
`(19)
`(29)
`
`(20)
`
`(20)
`(20)
`(20)
`(15)
`(28)
`(14)
`(17)
`(17)
`(18)
`(26)
`(22)
`
`(20)
`(20)
`(20)
`(20)
`
`Etiology: ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; CD, Cushing’s disease; AA, adrenal adenoma; EAS, ectopic ACTH secretion; NCS, normocortisolemic Cushing’s
`syndrome; NA, not available. Dose: mg/day. Duration: months. Clinical improvement: NE, not available. Adapted from ref. (16).
`
`in patients with most severe forms of CS. In these
`cases, a combination of mifepristone with anticortisolic
`drugs may ameliorate treatment-induced hypokalemia.
`Of note that hypokalemia was rapidly reversible (within
`48 h) after cessation of mifepristone treatment.
`The other important aspect in the management of
`patients receiving mifepristone is the risk of adrenal
`insufficiency. During mifepristone treatment, adrenal
`insufficiency can only be assessed by clinical obser-
`vation, as cortisol and ACTH concentrations are either
`elevated or not altered by mifepristone treatment.
`As outlined above, high cortisol
`levels may cause
`overstimulation of mineralocorticoid receptors leading
`to low serum potassium concentrations and even
`elevated blood pressure levels further hindering the
`assessment of adrenal insufficiency. Key clinical features
`are weakness, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and hypogly-
`cemic episodes. In our series, three patients presented
`clinical signs suggestive of adrenal insufficiency leading
`to therapeutic problems. This result is quite similar to
`previous reports. Out of 19 adult patients with CS
`described previously, there were five events of adrenal
`insufficiency based on clinical assessment (16). Admin-
`istration of dexamethasone led to rapid reversal and was
`highly effective in treatment of mifepristone-induced
`adrenal
`insufficiency. Dexamethasone is superior to
`intravenous hydrocortisone because of its high affinity
`
`to the glucocorticoid receptor and its lack of miner-
`alocorticoid activity (23). However, it should be given
`for at least two days because of the prolonged half-life of
`mifepristone (90 h). Monitoring of patients with CS
`receiving mifepristone is demanding and requires
`particular attention to detect and treat adrenal
`insufficiency. Careful education of the patients is also
`mandatory.
`The median dosage to control CS in our study was
`lower than reported previously. This may be related to
`different formulations of the drug, or because of different
`levels of cortisol secretion. Based on our study,
`it
`seems that most of the patients can be controlled with
`a daily dose of 400–800 mg and that a daily dose
`above 1000 mg is probably not more effective but may
`be associated with higher toxicity. We therefore,
`recommend to start with a daily dosage of 200–400 mg
`and to increase the dose according to clinical efficacy
`(e.g. blood pressure) and tolerance (blood potassium
`level, signs of adrenal insufficiency). In patients in whom
`rapid improvement is needed (e.g. psychosis), it seems
`reasonable to increase the dosage every three days by
`200 mg. In all other patients, dosage adjustments in
`every two weeks may be preferable.
`The potential risks and benefits of mifepristone have
`to be weighed against alternative treatment options.
`In comparison with mifepristone, the main advantage of
`
`www.eje-online.org
`
`Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 11/19/2018 08:15:24PM
`via free access
`
`6
`
`

`

`EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (2009) 160
`
`Mifepristone in Cushing’s syndrome
`
`1009
`
`adrenostatic drugs for CS is the possibility to monitor
`cortisol concentration, whereas during mifepristone
`cortisol concentration provides no guidance for treat-
`ment. However, most of the time, other anticortisolic
`drugs also expose patients to frequent and/or severe side
`effects without superior efficacy (27). Ketoconazole has
`been shown to be highly useful in the treatment of CS
`(9). However, serious and life-threatening hepatotoxi-
`city has been described (32). Moreover, ketoconazole is
`no longer available in some European countries (e.g.
`Germany). Metyrapone, an inhibitor of 11-b-hydroxylase,
`is not easily available in several European countries
`and may also be associated with significant side
`effects (10). Etomidate induces profound inhibition of
`11-b-hydroxylase also in non-hypnotic doses. However,
`it can only be used intravenously and, therefore, is not
`well-suited for long-term treatment (33). Similarly, the
`use of mitotane is not without difficulties. It has a
`narrow therapeutic window and it often takes several
`weeks to months to reach plasma target
`levels.
`Numerous side effects of mitotane have been reported,
`and a significant percentage of patients may not tolerate
`long-term mitotane therapy due to gastrointestinal
`and/or neurotoxic adverse events (6–8, 27). Thus,
`treatment with mifepristone may be of a significant
`value in the medical
`treatment of CS in a high
`percentage of cases.
`Our study has several limitations: it is a multicenter
`and retrospective report suffering from the classical
`drawbacks of this type of investigations. Secondly, in
`some patients, mainly with adrenal carcinoma, mife-
`pristone was combined with adrenostatic drugs or
`chemotherapy. However, this concomitant treatment
`was not altered during mifepristone treatment. Third,
`due to its mechanism of action, biochemical evalua

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket