`Thursday, September 19, 2019 12:56 PM
`dmcphail@taftlaw.com; RWhite@taftlaw.com; eshuster@taftlaw.com;
`bielenlt@yahoo.com
`Trials
`PGR2019-00025
`
`Follow up
`Flagged
`
`. F
`
`rom:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Follow Up Flag:
`Flag Status:
`
`Counsel,
`
`The Board has received Patent Owner's request for a conference call "prior to filing a motion to a motion to
`amend." Paper 20. The Scheduling Order (Paper 15) in this proceeding requires Patent Owner to request a
`conference call no more than two weeks prior to DUE DATE 1 (October 9, 2019), the date on which a motion to
`amend MUST be filed. Patent Owner’s request satisfies that requirement.
`
`Paper 20 does not affirmatively indicate whether Patent Owner will be filing a motion to amend or has any specific
`questions regarding the process. Nor is there an indication that Patent Owner intends to elect the option under the
`MTA Pilot Program to receive preliminary guidance from the Board on the substance of any amended claims in its
`motion to amend. See Scheduling Order, section 6. Clarification is requested.
`
`For details about filing a motion to amend and the MTA Pilot Program, we refer the parties to the materials set
`forth in our Scheduling Order. We also refer the parties to L&P Property Management Co. v. Remarco Machinery
`& Technology (Wujiang) Co., Ltd., IPR2019-00255 (Paper 15) (PTAB June 18, 2019) (Information and Guidance
`on Patent Owner’s Proposed Motion to Amend).
`
`After considering the above information and providing the requested clarification, if Patent Owner still has
`specific questions regarding its motion to amend or the MTA Pilot Program, it is welcome to contact the Board via
`return email providing times when both parties are available and a general description of its concerns.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`1
`
`PGR2019-00025
`Ex. 3001
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
