throbber
1 A U G U S T
`
`Correspondence
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/61/3/482/491533 by Cedars Sinai Medical Library user on 11 November 2019
`
`Bifidobacterium Species
`Bacteremia: Risk Factors in
`Adults and Infants
`
`TO THE EDITOR—We read with great inter-
`est the article by Bertelli et al [1], which
`reported 2 cases of Bifidobacterium spe-
`cies bacteremia in newborns receiving
`probiotics. Recently, we managed an adult
`case of Bifidobacterium longum bacter-
`emia in a 74-year-old man treated by
`chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, and ra-
`diotherapy for an active polymetasta-
`tic prostatic adenocarcinoma. He had a
`medical history of diabetes mellitus and
`obesity (body mass index of 32 kg/m2).
`He was admitted to our hospital for an-
`orexia and spasmodic abdominal pain
`of 1 month. His temperature was 39°C,
`and physical examination revealed no
`abnormalities. Laboratory findings were
`C-reactive protein 166 mg/L, and white
`blood cell count of 5 Giga/L. Blood cul-
`tures grew B. longum. The identification
`was performed using matrix-assisted
`laser desorption-ionization–time of flight
`mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)
`(Bruker Daltonik Bremen, Germany)
`with a score >2. Our patient did not
`report any probiotic treatment or exces-
`sive consumption of dairy products. A
`treatment with intravenous amoxicillin-
`clavulanic acid 1000 mg 3 times daily was
`given for 15 days with a good outcome.
`To deal with this emerging species,
`we performed a literature review up to
`March 2015 using the PubMed database,
`retrieving only 21 cases of human bacter-
`emia due to Bifidobacterium species [1–
`8].These cases are summarized in Table 1.
`The species most frequently reported
`longum and Bifidobacterium
`were B.
`eriksonii reclassified as Bifidobacterium
`dentium [9]. Most cases had abdominal
`symptoms as reported in our case. As
`
`described in Table 1, Bifidobacterium
`species grew from blood cultures in 1–
`10 days. Among these 22 cases, including
`ours, 7 were pediatric cases [1, 5–7]. All
`received probiotics to prevent necrotizing
`enterocolitis, as reported by Bertelli et al
`[1]. In preterm infants, Bifidobacterium
`species bacteremia is therefore related to
`the administration of probiotics, as strains
`from blood and probiotics have been
`found to be genetically similar [1].
`By contrast, in adults, the role of probiot-
`ic administration remains largely unknown.
`Indeed, in our review, none of the reports
`described the use of probiotics in the 15
`adult cases (Table 1). Nonetheless, 5 pa-
`tients were immunocompromised ( pro-
`static cancer, n = 2; rectal cancer, n = 1;
`systematic lupus erythematous, n = 2), and
`4 cases were related to pregnancy (3 occur-
`ring postpartum, 1 during pregnancy).
`Prognosis of treated Bifidobacterium spe-
`cies infections is usually good (Table 1),
`and 16 of 22 patients recovered (73%).
`Bifidobacterium species bacteremia
`seems to be a rare event, but its true inci-
`dence could be underestimated. Indeed,
`Bifidobacterium species could be consid-
`ered as nonpathogenic bacteria, as these
`anaerobic, nonsporulating, gram-positive
`rods are part of the physiological oral,
`vaginal, and intestinal flora. Besides bac-
`teremia, urinary, pleuropulmonary, ob-
`stetric, and gynecologic infections and
`dental caries have been reported [9]. Tra-
`ditional culture techniques for the detec-
`tion, quantification, and identification of
`Bifidobacterium species are now being
`complemented by MALDI-TOF MS and
`molecular techniques [10], improving
`detection and diagnosis of these bac-
`teria. Bacteremia due to Bifidobacterium
`species is an emerging entity, and the role
`of probiotics should be better investigated
`
`in cases occurring in adults, as already
`studied in preterm infants.
`
`Note
`
`Potential conflicts of interest. All authors:
`No reported conflicts.
`All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form
`for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.
`Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the
`content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
`
`Emmanuelle Weber,1 Quitterie Reynaud,1
`Florence Suy,2 Amandine Gagneux-Brunon,1,3
`Anne Carricajo,3,4 Aline Guillot,5 and
`Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers1,3
`1Infectious Diseases Department, University Hospital of
`Saint-Etienne, 2MIIT Médical, Villeurbanne, 3Groupe
`Immunité des Muqueuses et Agents Pathogènes,
`University of Lyon, and 4Bacteriologic Laboratory,
`University Hospital, and 5Oncology Department, Institut
`Cancérologique de la Loire, Saint-Etienne,
`France
`
`References
`
`1. Bertelli C, Pillonel T, Torregrossa A, et al. Bi-
`fidobacterium longum bacteremia in preterm
`infants receiving probiotics. Clin Infect Dis
`2015; 60:924–7.
`2. Guillard F, Appelbaum PC, Sparrow FB.
`Pyelonephritis and septicemia due to gram-
`positive rods similar to Corynebacterium
`group E (aerotolerant Bifidobacterium
`adolescentis). Ann Intern Med 1980; 92:
`635–6.
`3. Ha GY, Yang CH, Kim H, Chong Y. Case of
`sepsis caused by Bifidobacterium longum.
`J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:1227–8.
`4. Mahlen SD, Clarridge JE. Site and clinical
`significance of Alloscardovia omnicolens
`and Bifidobacterium species isolated in the
`clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2009;
`47:3289–93.
`5. Ohishi A, Takahashi S, Ito Y, et al. Bifidobac-
`terium septicemia associated with postopera-
`tive probiotic therapy in a neonate with
`omphalocele. J Pediatr 2010; 156:679–81.
`6. Jenke A, Ruf E-M, Hoppe T, Heldmann M,
`Wirth S. Bifidobacterium septicaemia in an
`extremely low-birthweight infant under pro-
`biotic therapy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal
`Ed 2012; 97:F217–8.
`7. Zbinden A, Zbinden R, Berger C, Arlettaz
`R. Case series of Bifidobacterium longum
`
`482 (cid:129) CID 2015:61 (1 August) (cid:129) CORRESPONDENCE
`
`Genome Ex. 1057
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/61/3/482/491533 by Cedars Sinai Medical Library user on 11 November 2019
`
`Probiotic
`Use
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`NA
`
`No
`
`Treatment
`
`Outcome
`
`Ceftazidime, vancomycin 7 d then
`imipenem 7 d
`Ceftazidime, amikacin,
`metronidazole
`
`Chloramphenicol 10 d
`Ticarcillin, metronidazole
`
`Recovered, surgical resection
`(intestinal necrosis)
`Recovered, surgical resection
`(intestinal necrosis, jejunal
`perforation)
`Recovered
`Recovered
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`Ampicillin-sulbactam,
`meropenem
`Cefotaxime, vancomycin
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`Recovered
`
`Recovered
`
`Flucloxacillin, gentamicin
`
`Recovered
`
`Amoxicillin, gentamicin
`
`Recovered
`
`Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid,
`gentamicin
`
`Complications post– surgical
`resection requiring serial
`laparotomy
`Recovered
`Died
`
`Recovered
`Recovered
`Recovered
`
`Recovered
`Recovered
`Recovered
`
`Died
`
`Recovered
`
`Table 1. Characteristics of Published Cases of Bifidobacterium Species Bacteremia
`
`Reference
`
`Sex, Age, y, Underlying
`Conditions
`
`Clinical Description
`
`Bifidobacterium
`Species
`
`Delay of Isolation
`in Blood Cultures
`
`Sepsis and ileus (3 episodes)
`
`B. infantis
`
`Septic shock, coagulopathy, ileus B. infantis
`
`Urinary infection
`Fever, chills, vomiting, diarrhea,
`and hepatomegaly
`Transient bacteremia secondary
`to ileal resection
`NA
`
`Peritonitis
`Post–omphalocele surgery,
`bilious gastric fluid
`Sepsis, distended abdomen
`
`Periumbilical redness with pus
`then marbled, pale skin and
`distended abdomen
`Suspected nosocomial infection
`
`B. adolescentis
`B. longum
`
`B. breve
`
`B. breve
`
`B. breve
`B. breve
`
`B. infantis,
`B. longum
`B. longum
`
`B. longum
`
`Acute necrotizing enterocolitis
`
`B. longum
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`2 d
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`4 d
`
`3 d
`
`3 d
`
`3 d
`
`3 d
`
`[1]
`
`[2]
`[3]
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`
`[7]
`
`[8]
`
`F, 0, low birthweight,
`prematurity
`F, 0, low birthweight,
`prematurity
`
`M, 41, none
`F, 19, recent partial
`laminectomy
`NA, prostate cancer
`
`NA, decubitus ulcer, frequent
`urinary tract infections
`NA
`F, 0, low birthweight,
`prematurity, omphalocele
`ND, 0, low birthweight,
`prematurity
`F, 0, prematurity, respiratory
`assistance first days
`
`M, 0, prematurity, respiratory
`assistance first days
`F, 0, prematurity, respiratory
`assistance first days
`
`F, 24, none
`M, 58, rectal cancer
`
`F, 39, none
`F, 35, none
`F, 29, none
`
`F, 21, none
`F, 31, none
`F, 34, SLE
`
`F, 60, SLE
`
`Present
`case
`
`M, 74, prostate cancer with
`colorectal invasion,
`diabetes mellitus
`
`CORRESPONDENCE (cid:129) CID 2015:61 (1 August) (cid:129) 483
`
`Delivery, fever
`Bowel obstruction, chills without
`fever
`Cholecystectomy, fever at day 1
`Uterine fibroid section, fever
`Postpartum, septic shock, chills,
`and fever
`Pregnancy, chills, and fever
`Postpartum, fever at day 2
`Multiple staphylococcal
`abscesses, subacute
`endocarditis
`Peritonitis due to diverticulosis,
`fever
`Fever, abdominal pain
`
`Bifidobacterium spp
`B. eriksonii
`
`B. eriksonii
`B. eriksonii
`B. eriksonii
`
`3–5 d of incubation None
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin, kanamycin,
`cephalothin
`3–5 d of incubation None
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin, kanamycin
`
`B. eriksonii
`Bifidobacterium spp
`Bifidobacterium spp
`
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin, kanamycin
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin, gentamicin
`3–5 d of incubation Oxacillin
`
`B. adolescentis
`
`B. longum
`
`3–5 d of incubation Ampicillin, gentamicin,
`cephalothin
`Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid
`
`26 h
`
`Abbreviations: NA, not available; ND, not disclosed; SLE, systematic lupus erythematous.
`
`Genome Ex. 1057
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/61/3/482/491533 by Cedars Sinai Medical Library user on 11 November 2019
`
`bacteremia in three preterm infants on pro-
`biotic therapy. Neonatology 2015; 107:56–9.
`8. Bourne KA, Beebe JL, Lue YA, Ellner PD.
`Bacteremia due to Bifidobacterium, Eubacte-
`rium or Lactobacillus; twenty-one cases and
`review of the literature. Yale J Biol Med
`1978; 51:505–12.
`9. Mayo B, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria: ge-
`nomics and molecular aspects. Norfolk,
`England: Caister Academic Press, 2010.
`10. Delgado S, Suárez A, Mayo B. Bifidobacterial
`diversity determined by culturing and by 16S
`rDNA sequence analysis in feces and mucosa
`from ten healthy Spanish adults. Dig Dis Sci
`2006; 51:1878–85.
`
`Correspondence: Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers, MD, PhD, Infectious
`Diseases Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne,
`42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France (e.botelhonevers@gmail.
`com).
`Clinical Infectious Diseases® 2015;61(3):482–4
`© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press
`on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All
`rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.
`permissions@oup.com.
`DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ347
`
`484 (cid:129) CID 2015:61 (1 August) (cid:129) CORRESPONDENCE
`
`Genome Ex. 1057
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket