throbber
J. Med Microbiol. - Vol. 45 (1996), 21-26
`0 1996 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland
`
`CLINICAL M ICROB IOLOGY
`
`Isolation of non-sporing anaerobic rods from
`infections in children
`
`I. BROOK*
`
`Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
`
`From 1974 to 1994, 2033 microbiological specimens from children were submitted for
`cultures for anaerobic bacteria. Fifty-seven
`isolates of Bifdobacterium spp. were
`obtained from 55 (3%) children, 67 isolates of Eubacterium spp. from 65 (3%) children
`and 41 isolates of Lactobacillus spp. from 40 (2%) children. Most Bifdobacterium
`isolates were from chronic otitis media, abscesses, peritonitis, aspiration pneumonia and
`paronychia. Most Eubacterium isolates were from abscesses, peritonitis, decubitus ulcers
`and bites. Lactobacillus spp. were mainly isolated from abscesses, aspiration pneumonia,
`bacteraemia and conjunctivitis. Most (> goo/,) infections from which these species were
`isolated were polymicrobial and yielded a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
`The organisms most commonly isolated with the non-sporing anaerobic gram-positive
`rods were Peptostreptococcus spp., Bacteroides spp., pigmented Prevotella and Porphyro-
`monas spp., Fusobacterium spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Most
`Bacteroides spp. and E. coli were isolated from intra-abdominal infection and skin and
`soft tissue infection around the rectal area, whereas most Prevotella, Porphyromonas and
`Fusobacterium isolates were from oropharyngeal, pulmonary and head and neck sites.
`The predisposing conditions associated with the isolation of non-sporing anaerobic gram-
`positive rods were previous surgery, malignancy, steroid therapy and immunodeficiency.
`Antimicrobial therapy was given to 149 (83%) of the 160 patients, in conjunction with
`surgical drainage or correction of pathology in 89 (56%).
`
`Introduction
`
`There has been increased interest in recent years about
`the role of anaerobic bacteria in paediatric infections
`[l]. The anaerobic species of most concern have been
`the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium,
`members of
`Fusobacterium
`and Peptostreptococcus
`[ 11. Non-
`sporing, anaerobic, gram-positive
`rods
`such as
`Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium and Lactobacillus spe-
`cies are usually considered to be of relatively low
`virulence. These organisms are taxonomically unrelated
`but are all non-motile and catalase-negative. These
`organisms have been
`isolated
`from adults with
`pulmonary infection (B. dentium)[2], from intra-uterine
`devices (E. nodatum) [3], and from peritonitis and the
`bloodstream (Lactobacillus spp.) [4,5]. However, their
`pathogenic role
`in
`these and other
`infections
`is
`uncertain. The organisms have been isolated in pure
`culture in only a few instances and are usually isolated
`in mixed culture from clinical specimens [ l , 61. The
`
`Received 14 Sept. 1995; revised version accepted 2 Dec.
`1995.
`*Correspondence should be sent to Professor I. Brook, PO
`Box 70412, Chevy Chase, MD 20813-0412, USA.
`
`infections where they have been found most often are
`chronic otitus media and sinusitis, aspiration pneumo-
`nia, and intra-abdominal, obstetric and gynaecological
`and skin and soft-tissue infections [l, 6,7].
`
`This retrospective review summarises my experience
`of the isolation of Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium and
`strictly anaerobic Lactobacillus spp. from infections in
`children over a 20-year period. Some of the data have
`been published previously in articles describing the
`role of anaerobic bacteria
`in various paediatric
`infections [l], but cases not previously presented are
`also
`included, and
`the clinical associations of
`Bifdobacterium, Eubacterium and strictly anaerobic
`Lactobacillus spp.
`in
`infections
`in children are
`emphasised.
`
`Patients and methods
`Patients
`The specimens included in this review were submitted
`for anaerobic investigation between June 1974 and June
`1994 in the following hospitals: University of Califor-
`nia Medical Center, County Medical Center and Serra
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`22
`
`I. BROOK
`
`Memorial Hospital in Los Angeles, and Fairview State
`Hospital, Costa Mesa, CA; Children’s Hospital National
`Medical Center and South-East Community Medical
`Center in Washington DC; and the Naval Hospital in
`Bethesda, MD, USA. The clinical microbiology
`laboratory records were reviewed to identify patients
`from whom Bzfidobacterium, Eubacterium and anae-
`robic Lactobacillus spp. were isolated and reported as
`potentially significant pathogens. Where available, the
`case records of the patients were reviewed to ascertain
`the presence and site of infection, associated micro-
`organisms, underlying diseases and possible pre-
`disposing or associated conditions.
`
`Microbiological exam in at ion
`Only specimens that were collected properly without
`contamination by the normal skin or mucosal flora and
`submitted in transport media appropriate for anaerobic
`bacteria were accepted by the microbiology labora-
`tories. These were generally specimens obtained during
`surgery or by aseptic needle or biopsy aspiration of
`abscesses or fluid from body cavities. Lung aspirates
`were obtained by transtracheal aspiration or through a
`tracheostomy or endotracheal tube or by biopsy. When
`possible, pus and fluids were collected and transported
`in syringes. Tissues were transported in oxygen-free
`gassed-out tubes. Swab specimens were submitted in
`the Port-A-Cul transport swab system (BBL, Cockeys-
`ville, MD, USA). However, precise records of all of the
`transport media used were not available. Blood for
`culture was collected aseptically from patients sus-
`pected of having bacteraemia and was inoculated
`(10%) into the anaerobic bottle of one of
`two
`commercially produced blood culture broth media;
`both were under vacuum and with CO2 5% in the
`atmosphere.
`
`The specimens were inoculated on to pre-reduced
`vitamin K1 -enriched Brucella Blood Agar (BBL),
`blood agar with kanamycin and vancomycin, blood
`agar containing colistin sulphate and nalidixic acid,
`and an enriched thioglycolate broth containing haemin
`and vitamin K1 [8,9]. The cultures were incubated in
`GasPak jars (BBL) and examined after 48 and 9 6 h
`[9]. Plates that showed any growth were held until the
`micro-organisms had been identified. All cultures that
`showed no growth were incubated for at least 5 days
`before being discarded. Anaerobic
`isolates were
`identified by the API Anaerobic System (Analytab
`Products, Plainview, NY, USA) or by the Minitek
`system (BBL). When complete identification was not
`possible by these methods, other carbohydrate tests
`(Scott Laboratories, Fiskeville, RI, USA) and gas-
`liquid chromatography (GLC) [8,9] were performed as
`needed to identify the organisms. The criteria for
`identification were according to guidelines in pub-
`lished schemes [8-lo].
`
`In gram-stained
`
`films, Bzfzdobacterium spp. are
`
`generally branched or bifurcate, Eubacterium spp.
`are pleomorphic and Lactobacillus spp. are straight or
`from strictly anaerobic
`to
`curved. Species vary
`aerotolerant [8,9], Bzfidobacterium and Lactobacillus
`spp. are nitrate-positive and indole-negative. Lactoba-
`cillus spp. produce lactic acid as the sole end product
`whereas Bifidobacterium spp. produce acetic and
`lactic acids (with more of the former than the latter).
`The genus Eubacterium comprises gram-positive, non-
`sporing bacilli whose GLC pattern is not characteristic
`of other genera.
`
`Results
`
`the study period, 2033 specimens were
`During
`examined for anaerobic bacteria; 57
`isolates of
`Bzfzdobacterium spp., 67 of Eubacterium spp. and 41
`of strictly anaerobic Lactobacillus spp. were obtained
`from various sites that accounted for 1780 specimens.
`These species were not isolated from other sites, such
`as bile, joint, bone, sinuses, central nervous system and
`urinary tract, that accounted for 253 specimens.
`
`Bijidobacterium spp.
`The 57 Bzfzdobacterium isolates were from 55 patients
`aged 2 weeks-16 years (mean 5 years and 8 months);
`37 were males (Table 1). The isolates comprised 19
`(33%) B. adolescentis, five (9%) B. dentium and 33
`(58%) other Bzfidobacterium spp. Infections were
`polymicrobial in 53 (96%) patients, but in two (4%)
`a Bzfidobacterium spp. was isolated in pure culture;
`these were an isolate of B. adolescentis from chronic
`otitis media and a Bzfidobacterium sp. from cervical
`adenitis.
`
`Most Bzfidobacterium isolates were from chronic otitis
`media (23; 40%), abscesses or peritonitis (7; 12%
`each), cholesteatoma, aspiration pneumonia and paro-
`nychia (3; 5% each). In the 53 specimens that yielded
`mixed growth including a Bzfzdobacterium sp., there
`were 148 other isolates; 89 (60%) of these were strict
`anaerobes and 59 (40%) were facultative or aerobic
`species. The number of isolates in mixed cultures
`varied from two to five (average 2.8 isolates/specimen;
`1.7 anaerobes and 1.1 facultative or aerobic species).
`
`The anaerobic organisms isolated most commonly
`with Bzfidobacterium spp. were Peptostreptococcus
`spp. (28 isolates), Fusobacterium spp. (1 7), pigmented
`Prevotella and Porphyromonas spp. ( 16) and Bacter-
`oides spp. (6). The most common aerobic and
`facultative organisms isolated with Bzfidobacterium
`spp. were a-haemolytic streptococci ( 15 isolates),
`Staphylococcus aureus
`(9), Escherichia
`coli
`(7),
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5) and Streptococcus pyo-
`genes (5). Most Bacteroides and E. coli isolates found
`in mixed culture with Bzfidobacterium spp. were from
`peritonitis, whereas most Prevotella, Porphyromonas
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`Table 1. Significant isolates of Bij?dobacterium, Eubacterium and Lactobacillus from clinical specimens in children
`Number of isolates of
`
`Bifidohacterium
`
`Eubacterium
`
`Lactobacillus
`
`d
`%
`
`‘U s
`
`2
`
`Type of infection
`
`- m Y G
`
`428
`342
`53
`142
`24
`24
`
`cri
`
`5
`
`1
`
`1
`7
`
`1
`
`6
`
`1
`11
`
`2
`
`7
`
`2
`23
`
`3
`
`01
`E
`2
`rri
`
`1
`
`rri
`
`4
`
`1
`
`rri
`
`2
`
`rri
`
`1
`
`2
`
`d
`%
`
`-
`
`Y
`
`24
`
`28
`
`4
`
`4
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`
`1
`
`4
`
`2
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`d
`%
`
`8
`4
`1
`3
`
`6
`
`14
`4
`1
`4
`
`8
`
`Abscess
`Bacteraemia
`Cervical lymphadenitis
`Ears: chronic otitis media
`chronic mastoiditis
`cholesteatoma
`Pulmonary
`aspiration pneumonia
`lung abscess
`pneumonia in cystic
`fibrosis
`Tracheostomy site
`Paronychia
`Wounds
`Burns
`Bites
`Gastrostomy site
`Decubitus ulcers
`Peritonitis
`Conjunctivitis
`Total
`
`74
`10
`6
`
`25
`33
`75
`180
`39
`22
`58
`116
`129
`1780
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`
`5
`
`19
`
`2
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`1
`
`3
`2
`33
`
`3
`2
`
`1
`3
`
`2
`2
`
`7
`2
`57
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`
`1
`6
`
`2
`1
`
`6
`
`1
`
`7
`1
`11
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`1
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`10
`
`42
`
`2
`2
`3
`2
`3
`1
`4
`17
`2
`67
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`3
`30
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`4
`41
`
`1
`
`1
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`z
`0
`f:
`z
`m
`
`E
`0
`>
`2:
`%
`w
`E
`
`cl
`
`E
`2
`cl
`z r
`
`U
`
`N W
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`24
`
`I. BROOK
`
`and Fusobacterium spp. were from ear, head and neck
`and pulmonary sites. Anaerobic cocci were isolated
`from all sites.
`
`Eleven (20%) of the patients had predisposing or
`underlying medical or surgical conditions. These were
`previous surgery (5), malignancy (2), steroid therapy
`(2) and
`tympanostomy
`tubes
`(2). Antimicrobial
`therapy was administered to all patients, in conjunc-
`tion with surgical drainage with or without correction
`of pathology in 21 (38%). The infections resolved in
`49 (89%) of the patients. Six (29%) of the 21 cases
`with chronic otitis media did not resolve. The
`systemic antimicrobial agents given were clindamycin
`(in 16 instances), a cephalosporin (14), oxacillin (8),
`co-amoxyclav (8), gentamicin (7), penicillin (4) and
`chloramphenicol (3). Local therapy with erythromycin
`ointment was used
`to
`treat
`the
`two cases of
`conjunctivitis.
`
`Eubacterium spp.
`The 67 isolates of Eubacterium spp. were from 65
`patients aged 7 days-16 years (mean 6 years and 2
`months); 39 patients were male (Table 1). The isolates
`comprised 11 (No/) E. lentum, six (1 1%) each of E.
`limosum and E. tenue, and one (2%) each of E.
`moniliforme and E. multiforme and 42 (74%) Eu-
`bacterium spp. Infections were polymicrobial in 6 1
`(94%) patients, but in four (6%) a Eubacterium sp. was
`the only isolate. The four isolates found in pure culture
`were one each of E. lentum and Eubacterium sp. in
`subcutaneous abscesses, and one isolate of a Eubacter-
`iurn sp. in each of a wound and a burn site.
`
`Most Eubacterium isolates were from abscesses (28;
`41%), peritonitis (17; 25%), decubitus ulcers (4; 6%)
`and bites (3; 4%). The 26 abscesses from which
`eubacteria were isolated were peritonsillar (8), retro-
`pharyngeal (4), perirectal (4), dental (3), abdominal
`(3), subcutaneous (2) and scalp (2). In
`the 61
`specimens that yielded a mixed growth including a
`Eubacterium sp., there were 152 other isolates; 94
`(62%) of these were strict anaerobes and 58 (38%)
`were facultative or aerobic bacteria. The number of
`isolates in mixed infection cultures varied from two to
`six (average 2.5 isolates/specimen; 1.5 anaerobes and
`1 .O facultative or aerobic). The anaerobic organisms
`isolated most commonly with eubacteria were Pepto-
`streptococcus spp. (40 isolates), Bacteroides spp. (1 6),
`Prevotella and Porphyromonas spp. (1 5) and Fuso-
`bacterium spp. (6). The most common aerobic and
`facultative organisms isolated with Eubacterium spp.
`were S. aureus (16 isolates), Esch. coli (13), a-
`haemolytic streptococci (12) and Str. pyogenes (5).
`Most Bacteroides spp. and E. coli found in mixed
`culture with Eubacterium spp. were from peritonitis
`and abscesses and wounds around the rectal area.
`Most Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium
`
`spp. were isolated from wounds and abscesses around
`or in the oropharynx.
`
`Twelve (18%) of the children had predisposing or
`underlying medical or surgical conditions. These were
`previous surgery (4), malignancy (3), steroid therapy
`(2), diabetes (2) and sickle cell disease (1). Systemic
`antimicrobial therapy was given to 59 (91%) patients,
`in conjunction with surgical drainage with or without
`correction of pathology in 47 (72%) instances. All the
`infections resolved. The antimicrobial agents given
`were clindamycin (in
`IS), a cephalosporin (16),
`gentamicin (12), oxacillin (9), co-amoxyclav (8),
`penicillin (6), chloramphenicol (4), erythromycin (3)
`and ticarcillin-clavulanate (2). Local therapy with an
`antibiotic or anti-infective ointment was given to two
`patients with wounds, two with burns and two with
`conjunctivitis.
`
`Lactobacillus spp.
`The 41 isolates of Lactobacillus spp. were from 40
`children aged 8 months-16 years (mean 7 years and 5
`months). The isolates were five (12%) L. acidophilus,
`three (7%) L. fermentum, two (5%) L. jensenii, one
`(2%) L. catenaforme and 30 (75%) Lactobacillus spp.
`Infections were polymicrobial in 36 (900/) patients.
`The four Lactobacillus isolates from blood cultures
`were in pure culture and were from four patients with
`intravenous catheter-related bacteraemia.
`
`Most Lactobacillus isolates were from abscesses ( 14;
`34%), aspiration pneumonia (8; 20%), ear infection,
`bacteraemia and conjunctivitis (4; 10% each). The 14
`abscesses from which Lactobacillus spp. were isolated
`were dental (4), subcutaneous (3), vulvovaginal (2),
`abdominal (2), subdiaphragmatic (l), lung (1) and
`tonsillar (1). In the 36 specimens that yielded mixed
`growth including a Lactobacillus sp., there were 76
`other isolates; 49 (64%) of these were strict anaerobes
`and 27 (36%) were facultative or aerobic bacteria. The
`number of isolates in mixed cultures varied from two
`to five (average 2.1 isolates/specimen, 1.4 anaerobes
`and 0.7 facultative of aerobic). The anaerobic organ-
`isms isolated most often with Lactobacillus spp. were
`Peptostreptococcus spp. (20 isolates), pigmented Pre-
`votella and Porphyromonas spp. (1 5) and Fusobacter-
`iurn
`spp.
`(8). The most common aerobic and
`facultative organisms isolated with Lactobacillus spp.
`were 5'. aureus (7 isolates), a-haemolytic streptococci
`(6), Haemophilus injhenzae (3) and E. coli (2). All
`Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium spp.
`were from abscesses and wounds around or in the
`oropharynx. Most S. aureus
`isolates were
`from
`subcutaneous abscesses and wounds, and the H.
`inguenzae isolates were from conjunctivitis and otitis.
`
`Eight of the patients had one or two predisposing or
`underlying medical or surgical conditions. These were
`intravenous catheter (4), immunodeficiency (3), ma-
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`labsorption (2) and malignancy (1). Systemic anti-
`microbial therapy was given to 35 (87%) patients, in
`conjunction with drainage with or without correction
`of pathology in 21 (52%) instances. All the infections
`resolved. The antimicrobial agents used were clinda-
`mycin (1 2), gentamicin (1 0), amoxycillin (9), co-
`amoxyclav (7), a cephalosporin (7), ticarcillin-clavu-
`lanate (4) and methicillin (3). In addition to systemic
`antimicrobial
`therapy,
`two of
`the
`four catheters
`associated with bacteraemia were removed. The two
`other patients recovered without the removal of the
`catheters. Local therapy with ophthalmic ointment
`containing antimicrobial agents resulted in recovery in
`the four cases of conjunctivitis.
`
`Discussion
`
`of
`prevalence
`the
`demonstrates
`review
`This
`Bijidubacteriurn, Eubacterium and Lactobacillus spp.
`in various infections in children. The 57 Bzjidobacter-
`ium isolates were obtained from 55 (3%) of the 2033
`specimens submitted for anaerobic cultures, the 67
`isolates of Eubacterium spp. were from 65 (3%)
`patients and the 41 Lactobacillus isolates were from
`40 (2%) children. These micro-organisms were found
`most commonly in infections associated with predis-
`posing or underlying conditions such as previous
`surgery, malignancy, immunodeficiency and the pre-
`sence of a foreign body.
`
`All three genera of non-sporing gram-positive anaero-
`bic rods were found in abscesses. Bzfidobacterium spp.
`were found mostly in head and neck and pulmonary
`infections, and in a smaller number of cases of
`peritonitis. In contrast, Eubacterium spp. were not
`isolated from chronic otitis media but were more
`frequent in peritonitis and wounds. Lactobacillus spp.
`were most commonly found in aspiration pneumonia
`and bacteraemia associated with intravenous catheters.
`
`Species of the genus Bifidobacterium are part of the
`commensal flora of the mouth, gastrointestinal tract
`and female genital
`tract and constitute a high
`proportion of the normal intestinal flora in man,
`especially in breast-fed infants [ 1 11. Although some
`infections caused by
`these organisms have been
`reported [12-151,
`little is known about their patho-
`genic potential. Eubacterium spp. are part of the flora
`of
`the mouth and
`the bowel. They have been
`recognised as pathogens in chronic periodontal disease
`[ 161, and in infections associated with intra-uterine
`devices [3], and have been isolated from patients with
`bacteraemia associated with malignancy [ 171 and from
`female genital tract infection [ 181. Lactobacillus spp.
`are ubiquitous inhabitants of the human oral cavity,
`the vagina and the gastrointestinal tract [19]. They
`have been implicated in various serious deep-seated
`infections, amnionitis [ 191 and bacteraemia [20].
`
`NON-SPORING ANAEROBIC RODS IN CHILDREN
`
`25
`
`The isolation of non-sporing anaerobic gram-positive
`rods from sites of sometimes serious infections in
`children suggests that they should not be automatically
`dismissed as contaminants. It appears that they may
`have clinical significance in high-risk patients with
`illnesses. As
`serious underlying
`they can cause
`significant infections, especially in high-risk patients,
`efforts should be made to secure specimens free of
`contamination by the normal flora of the mucous
`membranes and the skin, and the clinical significance
`of each isolate must be carefully evaluated. Eradica-
`tion of these micro-organisms from deep-seated sites
`of
`infection may be difficult. All non-sporing
`anaerobic gram-positive
`rods are
`susceptible
`to
`penicillin G, carbenicillin and chloramphenicol [2 11.
`Clindamycin is effective against 94% of
`isolates,
`erythromycin against 88% and tetracycline against
`60% [22]. Metronidazole is effective against only 50%
`of isolates [21-231. The efficacy of cephalosporins
`varies between 89% and 95%.
`
`The assistance of the staff of the microbiology laboratories at the
`University of California Medical Center, County Medical Center and
`Serra Memorial Hospital in Los Angeles, Fairview State Hospital in
`Costa Mesa, and Children’s Hospital National Medical Center and
`South-East Medical Center in Washington, DC, and the Naval
`Hospital in Bethesda, MD, and the secretarial support of Sarah
`Blaisdell are gratefully acknowledged.
`
`References
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Brook I. Pediatric anaerobic infection: diagnosis and manage-
`ment, 2nd edn. St Louis, Mosby. 1989.
`Georg LK, Roberstad GW, Brinkman SA, Hicklin MD. A new
`pathogenic anaerobic Actinomyces species. J Infect Dis 1965;
`115: 88-99.
`Hill GB, Ayers OM, Kohan AP Characteristics and sites and
`infection of Eubacterium nodatum, Eubacterium
`timidum,
`Eubacterium brachy, and other asaccharolytic eubacteria.
`J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1540-1545.
`Bayer AS, Chow AW, Betts, D, Guze LB. Lactobacillemia -
`report of nine cases: important clinical and therapeutic
`considerations. Am J Med 1978; 64: 808-813.
`Bourne KA, Beebe JL, Lue YA, Ellner PD. Bacteremia due to
`Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium or Lactobacillus; twenty-one
`cases and review of the literature. Yale J Biol Med 1978; 51:
`505-512.
`Finegold SM. Anaerobic bacteria in human disease. New York,
`Academic Press. 1977.
`Brook I, Frazier EH. Significant recovery of nonsporulating
`anaerobic rods from clinical specimens. Clin Infect Dis 1993;
`16: 476-480.
`Holdeman LV, Cat0 EP, Moore WEC, eds. Anaerobe laboratory
`manual, 4th edn. Blacksburg, VA, Anaerobe Laboratory,
`Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1977.
`Summanen P, Baron EJ, Citron DM, Strong CA, Wexler HM,
`Finegold SM. Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology manual, 5th
`edn. Belmont, CA, Star Publishing Company. 1993.
`Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfalter MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH.
`Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th edn. Washington DC,
`ASM Press. 1995.
`Sat0 J, Mochizuki K, Homma N. Affinity of the Bzjidobacter-
`ium to
`intestinal mucosal epithelial cells. Bipdobacteria
`Microflora 1982; 1: 51-54.
`Gorbach SL, Thadepalli H. Clindamycin in pure and mixed
`anaerobic infections. Arch Intern Med 1974; 134: 87-92.
`O’Connor J, MacCormick DE. Mixed organism peritonitis
`complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. NZ
`Med J 1982; 95: 811-812.
`Thomas AV, Sodeman TH, Bentz RR. Bifidobacterium
`(Actinomyces) eriksonii infection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974;
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`26
`
`I. BROOK
`
`110: 663-668.
`15. Hata D, Yoshida A, Ohkubo H et al. Meningitis caused by
`Bifidobacterium in an infant. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988; 7:
`669-67 1.
`16. Vincent JW, Falkler WA, Suzuki JB. Systemic antibody
`response of clinically characterized patients with antigens of
`Eubacterium brachy initially and following periodontal therapy.
`J Periodontol 1986; 57: 625-63 1.
`17. Fainstein V, Elting LS, Bodey GF! Bacteremia caused by non-
`sporulating anaerobes in cancer patients. A 12-year experience.
`Medicine (Baltimore) 1989; 68: 151-162.
`18. Brook I. Anaerobic bacterial bacteremia: 12-year experience in
`two military hospitals. J Infect Dis 1989; 160: 1071-1075.
`19. Cox SM, Phillips LE, Mercer LJ, Stager CE, Waller S, Far0 S.
`Lactobacillemia of amniotic fluid origin. Obstet Gynecol 1986;
`
`68: 134-135.
`20. Sherman ME, Albrecht M, DeGirolami PC et al. Lactobacillus:
`an unusual case of splenic abscess and sepsis in an
`immunocompromised host. Am J Clin Path01 1987; 88: 659-
`662.
`21. Sutter VL, Finegold SM. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to
`23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976;
`10: 736-752.
`22. Rolfe RD, Finegold SM. Comparative in vitro activity of
`ceftriaxone against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents
`Chemother 1982; 22: 338-341.
`23. Wexler HM, Finegold SM. In vitro activity of cefotetan
`compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against
`anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988; 32:
`60 1-604.
`
`Genome Ex. 1056
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket