throbber
Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________________________
`
`GENOME & COMPANY, )
`
` Petitioner, )
`
` v. )
`
`THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, )
`
` Patent Owner. )
`
`_______________________________)
`
` DEPOSITION OF SRIDHAR MANI, M.D.
`
` September 26, 2019
`
` 9:13 a.m.
`
` Deposition of SRIDHAR MANI, M.D.,
`
` taken by Petitioner, at the offices of Mintz,
`
` Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.,
`
` Chrysler Center, 666 Third Avenue, New York, New
`
` York, before Brandon Rainoff, a Federal
`
` Certified Realtime Reporter and Notary Public of
`
` the State of New York.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 1 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY and POPEO, P.C.
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
` Chrysler Center
`
` 666 Third Avenue
`
` New York, New York 10017
`
` 212.935.3000
`
`BY: JOHN A. BAUER, ESQ.
`
` 212.692.6795
`
` jabauer@mintz.com
`
` ANDREW R. REEVES, Ph.D.
`
` 212.692.6283
`
` arreeves@mintz.com
`
` - and -
`
` One Financial Center
`
` Boston, Massachusetts 02111
`
` 617.542.6000
`
`BY: KONGSIK KIM, ESQ.
`
` 617.348.3087
`
` kkim@mintz.com
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 2 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S (CONTINUED):
`
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
` One CityCenter
`
` 850 Tenth Street, NW
`
` Washington, DC 20001-4956
`
` 202.662.6000
`
`BY: SCOTT E. KAMHOLZ, M.D., Ph.D., ESQ.
`
` 202.662.5339
`
` skamholz@cov.com
`
` - and -
`
` The New York Times Building
`
` 620 Eighth Avenue
`
` New York, New York 10018-1405
`
` 212.841.1000
`
`BY: JENNIFER L. ROBBINS, ESQ.
`
` 212.841.1180
`
` jrobbins@cov.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 3 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 4
`
` I N D E X O F E X A M I N A T I O N
`
`Witness:
`
`Sridhar Mani, M.D.
`
`Examination:
`
`By Mr. Bauer.........................Page 8
`
`Index of Exhibits....................Page 4
`
`Previously-Marked Exhibit............Page 5
`
` *********
`
` I N D E X O F E X H I B I T S
`
`1041 .........................................37
`
`Multipage document entitled: Mechanisms of
`
`Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Why Does
`
`Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Not Work for All
`
`Patents
`
` *********
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 4 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 5
`
`P R E V I O U S L Y - M A R K E D E X H I B I T S
`
`2007 .........................................11
`
`Declaration of Sridhar Mani, M.D., in Support of
`
`Patent Owner Response
`
`1029 .........................................39
`
`Multipage document entitled: Mutational landscape
`
`determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small
`
`cell lung cancer
`
`2028 .........................................43
`
`Multipage printout from the journal Nature Reviews,
`
`bearing the heading: Tumour immunology &
`
`immunotherapy, Cancer
`
`2030 .........................................56
`
`Multipage printout from the journal Science, bearing
`
`the heading: Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy
`
`2037 .........................................34
`
`Multipage printout from the journal American
`
`Association for Cancer Research, bearing the heading:
`
`Clinical Cancer Research
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 5 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 6
`
`P R E V I O U S L Y - M A R K E D E X H I B I T S
`
` ( CONTINUED )
`
`2040 .........................................66
`
`Multipage printout from the journal Journal of
`
`Immunotherapy, September 2013
`
`2043 .........................................71
`
`Multipage printout from the journal Journal of
`
`Clinical Oncology, bearing the heading: 2014 ASCO
`
`Annual Meeting Proceedings
`
`2048 .........................................73
`
`Multipage printout from the journal Journal of
`
`Clinical Oncology, bearing the heading: 2015 ASCO
`
`Annual Meeting Proceedings
`
`1004 .........................................74
`
`Multipage document bearing the heading:
`
`Bifidobacterium longum, a lactic acid-producing
`
`intestinal bacterium inhibits colon cancer and
`
`modulates the intermediate biomarkers of colon
`
`carcinogenesis
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 6 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 7
`
`P R E V I O U S L Y - M A R K E D E X H I B I T S
`
` ( CONTINUED )
`
`1007 .........................................98
`
`Multipage document bearing the heading: Antitumor
`
`Effect of Bifidobacterium Infantis in Mice
`
`1005 ........................................109
`
`Multipage document bearing the heading: Early Human
`
`Development, The role of intestinal bifidobacteria on
`
`immune system development in young rats
`
`1011 ........................................114
`
`Multipage document bearing the heading: BMC Cancer,
`
`Anti-proliferative effects of Bifidobacterium
`
`adolescentis SPM0212 extract on human colon cancer
`
`cell lines
`
`1017 ........................................122
`
`United States, Patent Application Publication, No. US
`
`2012/0276143 A1
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 7 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` * * *
`
` P R O C E E D I N G
`
` Thursday, September 26, 2019
`
` New York, New York
`
` 9:13 a.m.
`
` * * *
`
`SRIDHAR MANI, M.D.,
`
` having been duly sworn, was examined
`
` and testified as follows:
`
`EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
` Q. Good morning, I'm John Bauer. I
`
` represent Genome & Company for the petitioner.
`
` How are you today, Dr. Mani?
`
` A. I'm fine, thank you.
`
` Q. Are you under any medication that
`
` would prevent you from giving truthful answers?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Or that would prevent you from fully
`
` understanding any question?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Have you ever had your deposition
`
` taken before?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Have you ever been involved in any
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 8 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` patent-related work, not as an inventor but as a
`
` consultant?
`
` A. Not that I recall.
`
` Q. You've never been hired in the
`
` capacity as an expert in a patent case?
`
` A. Not that I recall.
`
` Q. How did your first contact with the
`
` law firm of Covington & Burling take place?
`
` A. I received an e-mail from a company,
`
` the name slips me, asking if I would be
`
` interested in this particular issue. And I
`
` looked at it and my expertise to pass a comment
`
` on the issue and that's how it proceeded. I
`
` said yes. They asked me for my CV and --
`
` Q. So this company that you mention, was
`
` that Covington & Burling or were you working
`
` with a company that represents experts that
`
` offer their expertise in certain fields?
`
` A. Correct, that I was working with a
`
` company that offered expertise.
`
` Q. Do you recall approximately when you
`
` received this first e-mail from this company
`
` that hires experts?
`
` A. Approximately May, I can't be sure
`
` exactly of the date.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 9 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. May --
`
` A. 2019.
`
` Q. Do you recall when you first were
`
` contacted by anyone from Covington & Burling?
`
` A. It was, I believe, shortly after the
`
` first contact with the company.
`
` Q. Do you recall who that was?
`
` A. It was Scott and Jennifer.
`
` Q. So that would be Scott Kamholz --
`
` A. Scott Kamholz and Jennifer.
`
` Q. Okay. All right, Jennifer. I think
`
` that will be good enough.
`
` Unless you would like to put your last
`
` name on the record?
`
` Why don't you put your last name on
`
` the record. Excuse me, for not recalling your
`
` last name.
`
` MS. ROBBINS: Robbins.
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
` Q. Would it have been Jennifer Robbins?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Basically what happened next in terms
`
` of your relationship and developing what
`
` ultimately became this report that was filed in
`
` this case?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 10 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I was questioned about my expertise,
`
` and I was asked to meet with Scott and Jennifer
`
` and I was presented materials pertinent to the
`
` case, in particular Dr. Braun's declaration.
`
` And I was asked to scientifically, in my
`
` scientific capacity as an expert, review the
`
` evidence therein.
`
` Q. In terms of a draft of your expert
`
` report, who prepared the first draft?
`
` A. I did.
`
` Q. Were there multiple changes that went
`
` back and forth with your attorneys?
`
` A. Yes. There was some assistance but it
`
` was largely my draft, my writing, yeah.
`
` Q. When you say assistance, what do you
`
` mean by that?
`
` A. There were a number of legal terms --
`
` I'm not a legal expert -- that Dr. Braun used,
`
` actually, that was formatted in a sense. It's
`
` my content, but just put in the right place,
`
` formatting, as I said, and -- for copies and
`
` that kind of --
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` MR. BAUER: So I'll hand to you what
`
` has already been marked as Exhibit 2007. You'll
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 11 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` see that we originally copied all in black and
`
` white. To the extent there are some color
`
` pages, I have put them on the top just in case
`
` we get -- in case we need to see them in color.
`
` (Exhibit 2007, Declaration of Sridhar
`
` Mani, M.D., in Support of Patent Owner Response,
`
` previously marked for identification)
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
` Q. Now, in preparing this declaration,
`
` what documents did you review?
`
` A. I reviewed Dr. Braun's declaration, I
`
` reviewed briefly the '302 patent, I reviewed the
`
` papers relevant to Dr. Braun's declaration, and
`
` I researched the topic.
`
` Q. When you say the papers relevant to
`
` Dr. Braun's declaration, can you be more
`
` specific?
`
` A. Papers he referenced in his
`
` declaration.
`
` Q. I see. You said you briefly reviewed
`
` the '302 patent.
`
` Did you also review the file history
`
` for the '302 patent?
`
` A. Briefly reviewed the file history.
`
` Q. About how long do you think you took
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 12 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` to go through that?
`
` A. I really don't recall. It was -- I
`
` really don't recall.
`
` Q. An hour? Two hours? A half hour?
`
` A. Perhaps.
`
` Q. Perhaps a half hour?
`
` A. No, perhaps an hour.
`
` Q. Okay. Since you haven't had your
`
` deposition taken before, I want to just fill you
`
` in on the roles as we move forward to help you.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. As you can see, I ask the questions,
`
` you provide the answers. To the extent that you
`
` can understand the question, you have to answer
`
` or provide an answer. However, from time to
`
` time your attorney may object or he may instruct
`
` you not to answer. If the attorney says, "I
`
` object," that's a legal issue between the
`
` lawyers, but you still have to answer the
`
` question if you can understand it.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If the lawyer says, "I object on the
`
` basis of attorney-client privilege and I
`
` instruct you not to answer," you are not
`
` required to answer the question.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 13 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If you don't understand a question
`
` today, will you let me know that you don't
`
` understand it?
`
` A. Yes, I will.
`
` Q. And if you don't ask me to rephrase
`
` it, can I assume that you understood the
`
` question?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. In terms of the rules, I'll read to
`
` you what your attorney read to Dr. Braun when
`
` his deposition was taken.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You may not talk with counsel for
`
` patent owner concerning the substance of your
`
` testimony until the deposition is entirely over
`
` at the end of the day.
`
` Is that understood?
`
` A. Yes, I understand.
`
` Q. So throughout the entire day you
`
` cannot talk to your lawyer or lawyers about
`
` your -- the substance of your testimony.
`
` A. Yes, I understand.
`
` Q. Did you meet with your lawyers prior
`
` to coming here today to have your deposition
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 14 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` taken?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. About how long?
`
` A. From the beginning?
`
` Q. Sure.
`
` A. Over 200 hours. I didn't meet with
`
` them for 200 hours --
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. -- I -- that's the amount of time I
`
` took to prepare my materials --
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. -- and my declaration.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` A. I can't say how many hours of that I
`
` met with my lawyers.
`
` Q. Okay. The question I asked was --
`
` thank you for your answer -- the question I
`
` asked was: In order to prepare for today, did
`
` you meet with your lawyers yesterday?
`
` A. Yes, I did.
`
` Q. So where do you -- I guess where do
`
` you reside?
`
` A. I met twice this week and twice last
`
` week, yeah.
`
` Q. To prepare for your deposition?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 15 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. To prepare for my deposition.
`
` Q. If you would add up those amount of
`
` hours, approximately how long was that just for
`
` the deposition prep?
`
` Just approximate, just approximate.
`
` A. Approximately 20, 30 hours.
`
` Q. That's good.
`
` A. Without having the numbers --
`
` Q. That's fine, that's fine.
`
` You are the author of a number of
`
` peer-reviewed journals, aren't you?
`
` A. Yes, I am.
`
` Q. What's your understanding of the peer
`
` review process?
`
` A. I did not really opine on that in my
`
` declaration. It's a broad process and I didn't
`
` really opine on that in my declaration as I was
`
` commenting or rebutting Dr. Braun's declaration.
`
` Q. Okay. Thank you for your answer, but
`
` I'm going to ask you again.
`
` What is your understanding of the peer
`
` review process?
`
` A. As I mentioned, I wasn't prepared
`
` because I didn't opine on that in my declaration
`
` of peer-reviewed papers, so I don't -- I can't
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 16 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` really comment on that with an opinion.
`
` Q. So you have no opinion on what the
`
` peer review process is?
`
` A. It's a very broad term, and for me to
`
` opine on that I need to be specific, and as
`
` specific as I can get is what I opined on in
`
` terms of Dr. Braun's declaration and his papers
`
` in my declaration.
`
` Q. So from time to time I'm going to ask
`
` you questions that may or may not be squarely
`
` addressed in your declaration.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Unless your attorney instructs you not
`
` to answer, you are required to answer those to
`
` the best of your ability, is that understood?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So in terms of peer review, would you
`
` agree that when you submit an article that is a
`
` peer-reviewed -- the journals -- a group of
`
` scientists completes a study -- well, let's put
`
` it this way.
`
` In the process -- you've had your --
`
` you've had a number of papers that are
`
` published?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 17 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Right? Generally what's the peer
`
` review process for those papers generally, what
`
` are the steps?
`
` A. Scientist submits a paper, there is a
`
` review of that, scientific review of that.
`
` Q. Who reviews that, which -- what kind
`
` of person, an expert in the field?
`
` A. Not necessarily. It's distributed
`
` to -- there are a lot of factors that go -- who
`
` is available. It doesn't have to be with
`
` expertise in that field, it can be an editorial
`
` decision depending on which journal it is.
`
` It's such a broad term, that's why I
`
` mentioned I did not opine on the peer review
`
` process in my -- in my declaration in reviewing
`
` Dr. Braun's peer review papers.
`
` Q. In your declaration you discuss
`
` anything about checkpoint inhibitors, correct?
`
` A. I discuss checkpoint inhibitors as it
`
` relates to Dr. Braun's declaration, my rebuttal
`
` to it, yes.
`
` Q. Now, you have -- in applying your
`
` analysis to the term "checkpoint inhibitor," did
`
` you include any antigen binding fragments that
`
` bind to and inhibit an immune checkpoint
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 18 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` protein, did you include that embodiment within
`
` your analysis in your report?
`
` A. Would you repeat that question?
`
` Q. Sure.
`
` A. It's a long question, I want to
`
` understand it.
`
` Q. In your report, when you were
`
` discussing an ailment of immune checkpoint
`
` inhibitors, did you also include that immune
`
` checkpoint inhibitor to include an antigen
`
` binding fragment that bound to and inhibit an
`
` immune checkpoint protein?
`
` A. I do not recall using those exact
`
` phrases in my declaration.
`
` Q. Your declaration does not address
`
` antibody fragments acting as immune checkpoint
`
` inhibitors, does it?
`
` A. It talks about inhibitors, checkpoint
`
` inhibitors.
`
` Q. Right. It does not talk about
`
` fragments that act as checkpoint inhibitors,
`
` correct?
`
` A. I don't use those specific terms
`
` verbatim, but checkpoint inhibitors implies an
`
` inhibitor of a checkpoint.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 19 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Right, but nowhere in your declaration
`
` do you discuss an embodiment in which an
`
` antibody fragment can be used as a checkpoint
`
` inhibitor, do you?
`
` A. I don't understand the term
`
` "embodiment."
`
` Q. Nowhere in your declaration do you
`
` discuss an example in which an antibody fragment
`
` can be used as a checkpoint inhibitor, do you?
`
` A. In paragraph 33 of my declaration I
`
` can take you and read this -- excuse me, if I
`
` can take you to the sentence.
`
` Q. Sure.
`
` A. Examples of preclinical studies
`
` illustrating the field's interest and pursuit of
`
` different checkpoint inhibitors included Romagné
`
` Exhibit 2009 and Kohrt Exhibit 2011, both
`
` anti-KIR antibodies; Woo, Exhibit 2012;
`
` anti-LAG3 antibody, alone and in combination
`
` with PD-1 antibody, Brignone Exhibit 2013;
`
` LAG-3Ig, which is an immunoglobulin --
`
` Q. Correct.
`
` A. -- Le Mercier Exhibit 2014 anti-VISTA
`
` antibody --
`
` Q. Right.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 20 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. -- Sakuishi anti-TIM-3, alone and in
`
` combination with PD-1 antibody; Beavis, Exhibit
`
` 2016 A2A antagonist.
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. So while I don't use the term, that
`
` specific term that you just quoted, it is
`
` understood that the checkpoint inhibitor,
`
` whether an antibody or a fragment or an
`
` antagonist, could also serve the same purpose.
`
` Q. Those references don't deal with
`
` fragments of antibodies, they deal with complete
`
` antibodies, correct?
`
` A. I'd have to look in depth. I know I
`
` referred to them, but I believe -- I believe
`
` some do.
`
` Q. You are guessing?
`
` A. I'm -- I need to look at the paper.
`
` Q. Is there a discussion of the epitope
`
` which these antibodies bind to in terms of which
`
` fragment they are using?
`
` A. An epitope -- well, it discussed the
`
` checkpoint KIR, LAG-3, LAG, VISTA, TIM-3, A2A.
`
` These are all checkpoints.
`
` Q. They are checkpoints, they are
`
` complete antibodies with the complete -- the
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 21 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` chain, the variable constant, and the variable
`
` region. There is no discussion in your
`
` declaration of a fragment that actually
`
` functions as a checkpoint inhibitor, is there,
`
` as your declaration is drafted right there?
`
` A. Yes, I have not used those words.
`
` Q. I'm not asking if you have used words.
`
` I'm asking you from the substance --
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. -- do you discuss an example of using
`
` an antibody fragment as a checkpoint inhibitor
`
` in that paragraph, do you?
`
` DR. KAMHOLZ: Objection, asked and
`
` answered.
`
` A. As I stated before, there are a number
`
` of examples here of checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. So you could inhibit a checkpoint with
`
` different molecules. Those are all checkpoint
`
` inhibitors, and I list -- as I just listed them
`
` here.
`
` Q. What is your understanding of the
`
` difference between an antibody and a fragment of
`
` an antibody?
`
` A. If an antibody is an inhibitor of a
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 22 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` target and the same -- a fragment of that
`
` antibody is also an inhibitor of the target,
`
` then both are inhibitors of the target.
`
` Q. What's the difference between a
`
` complete antibody and a fragment of an antibody?
`
` DR. KAMHOLZ: Objection, asked and
`
` answered.
`
` A. I just answered that but I'll repeat
`
` it.
`
` If an antibody inhibits a target, and
`
` a fragment of that antibody, whatever that
`
` fragment is, inhibits the target, then both are
`
` checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. But would you agree with me that the
`
` way -- just on the page in front of you there is
`
` not a description of a fragment of an antibody
`
` acting as a checkpoint inhibitor in that
`
` paragraph?
`
` DR. KAMHOLZ: Objection, asked and
`
` answered.
`
` A. I will repeat the statement again:
`
` Examples of preclinical studies illustrating the
`
` field's interest in different checkpoint
`
` inhibitors -- checkpoint inhibitors -- include
`
` Romagné and Kohrt, both anti-KIR antibody -- I
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 23 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` could read the whole paragraph --
`
` Q. But they don't say fragments of those
`
` antibodies, do they, that paragraph -- let me
`
` ask the question.
`
` In the paragraph you just cited, you
`
` are talking about a description of an antibody,
`
` not a fragment of an antibody, correct?
`
` A. I'm just -- in this paragraph I'm
`
` stating that there are different checkpoint
`
` inhibitors. Some are antibodies, some are
`
` antibody-like immunoglobulins, some are
`
` antagonist, and it's listed here and I can go
`
` over that again.
`
` Q. Are any of those entities that you
`
` just mentioned a fragment of an antibody?
`
` DR. KAMHOLZ: Objection, asked and
`
` answered.
`
` A. As I have stated in my declaration,
`
` Romagné and Kohrt both describe anti-KIR
`
` antibodies, Brignone describes a LAG-3Ig, and
`
` Beavis describes an A2A antagonist. Different
`
` checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. Are they fragments, are any of them
`
` fragments or are any of them not fragments?
`
` A. I did not opine on those words in my
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 24 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` declaration.
`
` Q. Now, in your declaration, when you
`
` were taking about an ailment of immune
`
` checkpoint inhibitors, did you also include an
`
` ailment of an immune checkpoint inhibitor that
`
` is an interfering nucleic acid molecule?
`
` A. Could you repeat that question? You
`
` used a term "an ailment."
`
` Sorry, could you repeat the question?
`
` Q. In your declaration when you were
`
` discussing checkpoint inhibitors, did you
`
` include the term "checkpoint inhibitor" to
`
` include an interfering nucleic acid molecule?
`
` A. I don't see that I used the specific
`
` terms as you've mentioned verbatim in my
`
` declaration, but I allude to checkpoint
`
` inhibitors.
`
` Q. Proteins?
`
` A. Checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. You are talking about proteins, aren't
`
` you?
`
` A. I'm talking about any strategy that
`
` inhibits checkpoints.
`
` Q. Nowhere in that declaration do you
`
` reference an interfering nucleic molecule
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 25 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 26
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` functioning as an immune checkpoint inhibitor,
`
` do you?
`
` A. In my declaration I've not referenced
`
` that specifically.
`
` Q. Nowhere in your declaration do you
`
` reference an immune checkpoint inhibitor as
`
` including an antisense RNA molecule, do you?
`
` A. I don't see a specific reference to
`
` that.
`
` Q. You see a general reference to it?
`
` A. As I mentioned, and I stated
`
` previously, that -- and I'm talking about
`
` inhibitors of checkpoints, any inhibitor of
`
` checkpoint.
`
` Q. Any?
`
` A. Any inhibitor, inhibitors of
`
` checkpoints, checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. Nowhere in your declaration do you
`
` reference as an immune checkpoint inhibitor an
`
` SI RNA molecule, correct?
`
` A. If I can understand, that was the
`
` previous question?
`
` Q. No, that was not the previous
`
` question.
`
` A. Can you repeat that again? SI is --
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 26 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Do you understand what an SI RNA
`
` molecule is?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What is it?
`
` A. Short interfering.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` A. Your previous question was antisense
`
` RNA.
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. The outcome is the same.
`
` Q. The antisense RNA doesn't deal with
`
` the length, does it?
`
` It's more generic, correct?
`
` A. No. You had asked me a question
`
` whether antisense RNA reflected -- whether I
`
` mentioned it in relationship to a checkpoint.
`
` Q. Right.
`
` A. But antisense is to the message of a
`
` checkpoint.
`
` Q. RNA molecule, correct?
`
` A. It's an RNA molecule, so is SI RNA,
`
` short interfering.
`
` Q. Nowhere in your declaration do you
`
` mention RNA molecules specifically or generally
`
` as functioning as immune checkpoint inhibitors,
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Genome Ex. 1042
`Page 27 of 141
`
`

`

`Sridhar Mani, M.D., - September 26, 2019
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` do you?
`
` DR. KAMHOLZ: Objection, compound.
`
` A. Can you break that question up?
`
` Q. Sure. Nowhere in your declaration do
`
` you mention RNA molecules functioning as immune
`
` checkpoint inhibitors, correct?
`
` A. I don't use the term RNA molecules as
`
` checkpoint inhibitors. However, as I stated
`
` before, they are all checkpoint inhibitors.
`
` Q. What is the word "all" that you are
`
` referring to, "they are all"?
`
` A. Any -- any strategy that inhibits
`
` checkpoints.
`
` Q. So I'm asking you a specific question.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. I'm talking about -- I'm trying to
`
` find out what is in your declaration --
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. -- and what is not in your
`
` declaration.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. That's thi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket