throbber
International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`International Journal of Food Microbiology
`
`j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / i j f o o d m i c r o
`
`Distinct Bifidobacterium strains drive different immune responses in vitro
`Patricia López a,b, Miguel Gueimonde b, Abelardo Margolles b,⁎, Ana Suárez a
`a Department of Functional Biology, Immunology Area, University of Oviedo, C/ Julián Clavería s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
`b Department of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (CSIC), Ctra. Infiesto s/n, 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
`
`a r t i c l e
`
`i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 3 October 2009
`Received in revised form 18 November 2009
`Accepted 19 December 2009
`
`Keywords:
`Bifidobacterium
`Probiotics
`Dendritic cells
`Cytokines
`T helper lymphocytes
`
`In this work we evaluated the specific immune activation properties of different Bifidobacterium strains,
`some of the most relevant intestinal microorganisms. To this end, we examined the in vitro effect of 12
`Bifidobacterium strains belonging to 4 different species, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifi-
`dobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
`lactis, on the maturation pattern of human
`monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs), as well as in their ability to induce cytokine secretion. In addition,
`we determined peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation and cytokine expression after
`exposure to bacterial strains.
`All bifidobacteria tested were able to induce full DC maturation but showed differences in the levels of
`cytokine production, especially IL-12, IL-10, TNFα and IL-1β, suggesting that specific cytokine ratios could be
`used to predict the type of Th response that they may promote. In fact, analysis of cytokine production by
`PBMC showed that most of the tested B. animalis and B. longum strains induced the secretion of large
`amounts of IFNγ and TNFα, in agreement with the Th1 profile suggested by DC cytokine production.
`Remarkably, three of four B. bifidum strains induced poor secretion of these cytokines and significant
`amounts of IL-17, the main product of Th17 cells, in accordance with the high IL-1β/IL-12 ratio observed after
`DC stimulation.
`In conclusion, this work shows species and strain-specific immune effects of bifidobacteria and describes a
`valuable method for screening possible probiotic strains with different immunomodulatory properties.
`Notably, some B. bifidum strains seem to promote Th17 polarization, which could be useful for future
`probiotic applications.
`
`© 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Bifidobacterium sp. are one of the most relevant probiotic micro-
`organisms since they colonize the intestinal tract soon after birth and are
`present at high population levels in both infants and adults (Guarner
`and Malagelada, 2003). These bacteria have a long history of being safely
`consumed (Salminen et al., 1998). Although there is a lot of information
`about the healthy properties of probiotics (Kopp-Hoolihan, 2001;
`Marteau et al., 2001), it is not always based on proven evidence and
`little is known about the precise mechanisms of action by which such
`bacteria may exert their beneficial effects. The events underlying these
`healthy effects are now beginning to be understood mainly from in vitro
`studies of host intestinal epithelial cell or immune cell responses to
`probiotic strains. Thus, probiotics are known to beneficially modulate
`several host cell functions, the most prevalent of which are immune
`responses and intestinal barrier integrity.
`Host defense against foreign challenge is elicited by the innate and
`the acquired immune systems, that induce both the systemic and the
`
`⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 985892131; fax: +34 985892233.
`E-mail address: amargolles@ipla.csic.es (A. Margolles).
`
`0168-1605/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.023
`
`mucosal immune responses. At the gut mucosal level, the innate
`immune response provides the first line of defense against pathogenic
`microorganisms but also provides the signals that instruct the adaptive
`immnune response (Macpherson et al., 2005). In this respect, dendritic
`cells (DCs) are considered as the link between innate and adaptive
`immunity. They are the most powerful antigen-presenting cells,
`promoting specific adaptive immune responses, but they also play a
`central role in the innate defense (Steinman and Hemmi, 2006). It has
`been shown that these antigen-presenting cells open the tight junctions
`between intestinal epithelial cells, send dendrites outside the epithe-
`lium and directly sample bacteria from the intestinal lumen (Rescigno
`et al., 2001). Contact with antigens or inflammatory stimuli can induce
`the maturation of DCs, accompanied by functional and phenotypic
`changes like the upregulation of costimulatory molecules and cytokine
`production (Joffre et al., 2009; Reis E Sousa, 2006), thus acquiring the
`ability to induce naive T cell proliferation and polarization towards Th1,
`Th2 or Th17 effector cells or, alternatively, to regulatory T cells (Zhu and
`Paul, 2008).
`A number of works indicated that commensal intestinal bacteria
`administered orally, such as probiotics, have the potential to modulate
`and regulate the immune response, at least in part, through their effects
`on intestinal mucosa DCs. In this respect, it has been described that
`
`Genome Ex. 1038
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`158
`
`P. López et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`different lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria induced very different
`maturation and cytokine production patterns on DCs, even generating
`opposite T cell responses. Certain probiotics were demonstrated to
`induce IL-12 production by macrophages and DCs, thus promoting IFNγ
`secretion and inflammatory Th1 responses (Fujiwara et al., 2004;
`Mohamadzadeh et al., 2005; Pochard et al., 2005), whereas other reports
`have shown that probiotic-induced IL-10 levels play a main role limiting
`Th1-mediated proinflammatory responses (Hart et al., 2004; Zeuthen
`et al., 2006). Furthermore, recent studies showed that Th17 cells are
`essential for the first-line defense against intestinal infection, although
`little is known about the effects of probiotic bacteria on human Th17
`polarization, a not well-known phenomenon in which IL-1β and IL-23
`seem to play an important role (Annunziato et al., 2008; Boniface et al.,
`2008; Mills, 2008). Finally, DCs exposed to probiotic bacteria may
`acquire tolerogenic properties and then T cell activation could be biased
`towards the generation of regulatory T cells (Smits et al., 2005).
`Like other probiotic bacteria, it has been described that Bifidobac-
`terium sp. may present distinct immunomodulatory effects both in vitro
`(Baba et al., 2008; Hart et al., 2004; Latvala et al., 2008; Medina et al.,
`2007; Niers et al., 2007; Young et al., 2004; Zeuthen et al., 2006) and in
`vivo (Fujiwara et al., 2004; Isolauri et al., 2000; Marteau et al., 2001;
`Myllyluoma et al., 2005; Schiffrin et al., 1995). However, comparative
`studies on the immunological traits of different strains of bifidobacteria
`that could support a rationale selection of probiotic strains for specific
`immunomodulatory benefits are very limited. For this reason, the aim of
`this study was to determine and compare the specific immune
`activation properties of different Bifidobacterium strains in order to
`establish useful criteria for their evaluation and selection which could be
`applied for further possible biotechnological or clinical applications. To
`this end, we determined maturation and cytokine production of human
`monocyte-derived DCs after exposure to different bifidobacterial
`strains. In addition, since most Bifidobacterium species are commensal
`microorganisms usually present in the gut of adult individuals, and thus
`interacting with immune cells, we analyzed the pattern of cytokine
`production by PBMCs after bifidobacterial stimulation to estimate the
`type of Th profile that could be induced in healthy individuals by each
`bacterial strain.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
`
`0.25% L-cysteine (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO) (MRSc) and
`incubated at 37 °C in anaerobic conditions (10% H2, 10% CO2 and 80% N2)
`in a Mac 500 chamber (Don Whitley Scientific, West Yorkshire, UK).
`Escherichia coli was grown in LB medium at 37 °C under aerobic
`conditions. For Lactococcus lactis MRSc was used and incubations were
`carried out at 30 °C under aerobic conditions. Planococcus antarcticus
`DSM 14505 was grown in medium 92 (trypticase soy broth 30.0 g, yeast
`extract 3.0 g, agar 15.0 g, distilled water 1,000 ml) at 4 °C.
`Overnight bacterial cultures were used to inoculate (1%) 50 ml of the
`corresponding fresh media. After incubation (24 h for E. coli and L. lactis,
`24–48 h for bifidobacteria and 10–15 days for P. antarcticus) cultures
`were harvested by centrifugation. Supernatants (25 ml for each strain)
`were dialysed using 2 kDa cut-off dialysis pipes (Sigma) against 46
`volumes of PBS (Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England).
`Subsequently, the dialysed material was concentrated using 5 kDa
`Vivaspin columns (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) down to a final
`volume of approximately 2.5 ml. Glycerol was added to a final
`concentration of 2% and the supernatants were quickly frozen in liquid
`nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. Protein concentration of the
`supernatants was determined with the BCA method. Bacterial pellets
`were washed three times in PBS buffer (Oxoid) and resuspended in 5 ml
`of the same buffer. Bacterial
`levels in the cell suspensions were
`determined by plate counting and cultures were killed by exposing
`them to UV light in a UV chamber (15 W, Selecta, Barcelona, Spain) for
`90 min. Plate counting was carried out after UV treatment to
`corroborate the absence of bacteria that are able to recover in the
`proper medium. UV treated bacterial suspensions were then distributed
`in single use aliquots, frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80 °C until use.
`
`2.2. Isolation of PBMCs
`
`Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained
`from standard buffy-coat preparations from routine blood donors
`(Asturian Blood Transfusion Center, Oviedo, Spain) by centrifugation
`over Ficoll-Hypaque gradients (Lymphoprep, Nycomed, Oslo, Norway).
`All blood donors (the number is specified in each figure legend) were
`healthy adult volunteers (58% male and 42% female) between 18–60 years
`(median age 43.34±12.04) without any pathology or treatment. Approval
`for this study was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee for Clinical
`Investigation.
`
`The different bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1.
`Bifidobacterial strains were grown in MRS medium (Difco, Becton,
`Dickinson and Company, Le Pont de Claix, France) supplemented with a
`
`2.3. Proliferation assays
`
`PBMCs proliferation was determined by quantifying [3H]thymi-
`dine incorporation to cultured cells. To quantify PBMC responses to
`
`Table 1
`Bacterial strains, origin and relevant phenotype.
`
`Strain
`
`B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12
`B. animalis subsp. lactis IPLA 4549
`B. animalis subsp. lactis 4549dOx
`B. longum NCIMB8809
`B. longum BM 6/2
`B. longum IF 3/6
`B. bifidum IF 10/10
`B. bifidum A8
`B. bifidum L22
`B. bifidum LMG11041T
`B. breve B27
`B. breve LMG13208T
`L. lactis IL594
`E. coli LMG 2092T
`P. antarcticus DSM 14505
`
`Origin
`
`Intestine of adult
`Culture collection
`Laboratory strain
`Nursling stools
`Infant
`Infant
`Infant
`Dairy product
`Adult
`Breast-fed infant
`Infant
`Infant
`Cheese starter
`Urine
`Ponds in Antarctica
`
`Relevant characteristics
`
`Selected reference
`
`Known probiotic strain
`–
`Bile-resistant derivative
`Producer of antimicrobial compounds
`–
`–
`–
`–
`Mucin-degrading strain
`–
`–
`In vitro antimutagenic activity
`–
`–
`–
`
`Garrigues et al. (2005)
`Ruas-Madiedo et al. (2005)
`Ruas-Madiedo et al. (2005)
`O'Riordan and Fitzgerald (1998)
`This work
`This work
`This work
`This work
`Ruas-Madiedo et al. (2008)
`Ventura et al. (2006)
`This work
`Chalova et al. (2008)
`Chopin et al. (1984)
`–
`Reddy et al. (2002)
`
`NCIMB, The National Collection of Industrial and Marine Bacteria, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom; LMG/BCCM, Belgian co-ordinated collections of micro-organims; DSM,
`German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures; IPLA, IPLA Culture Collection; T, type strain.
`
`Genome Ex. 1038
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`P. López et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`159
`
`different UV-killed bacterial strains, 2×104 PBMCs were incubated
`with bacteria at a PBMCs:bacteria ratio of 1:5. All cultures were
`performed in triplicate wells in 200 μl of complete medium in 96-well
`round-bottom microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA). After 4 days
`of culture, 100 µl of supernatants from these cultures was collected for
`cytokine determination and 100 µl of complete medium was added
`back to the wells plus 1 μCi/well [3H]thymidine. After 16 h cells were
`harvested onto glass fiber filters for counting cell-incorporated [3H]
`thymidine using standard scintillation techniques (Packard Instru-
`ments, Downers Grove, IL). Results were determined as a stimulation
`index (SI) which was calculated as the ratio between the mean counts
`per minute (cpm) values measured in stimulated triplicates and the
`mean cpm values measured in unstimulated triplicates.
`
`2.4. Generation of monocyte-derived DCs
`
`Monocytes were isolated from previously obtained PBMCs by
`negative selection using the Human Monocyte enrichment kit, accord-
`ing to the protocol provided by EasySep, StemCell Technologies
`(Canada). Purified monocytes were N95% CD14+. Independent experi-
`ments were performed with cells from different individuals. Immature
`DCs were obtained from isolated monocytes by standard procedures.
`Thus, monocytes were cultured for 7 days in the presence of
`recombinant human (rh) IL-4 (35 ng/ml) and rhGM-CSF (70 ng/ml)
`(R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). At days 2 and 5, 0.5 ml of the medium
`was removed without disturbing the clusters of developing DC and
`0.5 ml of freshly made GM-CSF- and IL-4-containing medium was added
`to the wells, restoring the final volume in each well to 1 ml. To generate
`immature DCs, monocytes were cultured in 24-well plates at a
`concentration of 5×105 cells/ml at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide in
`complete RPMI medium (RPMI 1640 containing 2 mM L-glutamine and
`25 mM Hepes, Bio Whitaker, Verviers, Belgium, supplemented with 10%
`heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and the antibiotics streptomycin and
`ampicillin at 100 μg/ml). At day 7, immature DCs were recovered,
`washed and resuspended in complete RPMI medium at 5×105 cells/ml
`for subsequent maturation.
`
`2.5. Stimulation of monocyte-derived DCs with bifidobacteria
`
`To examine the effects of the different Bifidobacterium strains on DC
`maturation, different bifidobacterial strains, L. lactis IL594 or E. coli LMG
`2092T, killed by UV radiation, were added to immature DC cells at a DC:
`bacteria ratio of 1:10 in complete RPMI medium or their cell-free culture
`supernatants (10%). Parallel cultures were treated with either 1 µg/ml
`LPS from E. coli 0111:B4 (Sigma), as a positive control of maturation, or
`left untreated, as a negative control. After 48 h, supernatants from these
`cultures were collected, clarified by centrifugation and stored at −20 °C
`for cytokine analysis whereas DCs were harvested for phenotypic
`characterization.
`
`2.6. Cell surface phenotype expression
`
`Phenotypic studies of DCs were performed after two or three-color
`staining with the appropriate monoclonal antibody (mAb) using a
`FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, BD Biosciences, San Diego,
`CA). Briefly, cells were stained directly with anti-CD86 fluorescein
`isothiocyanate (FITC, clone 2331), CD80 phycoerythrin (PE, clone
`L307.4) and HLA-DR (PE-Cy5, clone L243) mAb; anti-CD1a FITC (clone
`HI149) and CD40 PE (clone 5C3) mAb and with the corresponding
`isotype-matched conjugated irrelevant mAb as a negative control. All
`mAb were supplied by Becton Dickinson Pharmingen. Staining was
`performed for 30 min at 4 °C, and cells were washed twice in staining
`buffer and resuspended in PBS. A minimum of 10,000 cells were
`acquired and analyzed using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
`The specific fluorescence intensity was quantified as the mean
`
`fluorescence intensity (MFI) calculated by subtracting the background
`of isotype-matched control staining from the total fluorescence.
`
`2.7. Cytokine determination
`
`Cytokine levels in cell culture supernatants were quantified by a
`multiplex immunoassay (cytometric bead array, CBA, BD) using
`FacsCalibur flow cytometer (BD). To determinate cytokine production
`of stimulated DCs the Human Inflamation kit for CBA was used (IL-8,
`IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, TNFα and IL-12p70) whereas quantification of
`cytokine production by cultured PBMCs was performed using a Flex
`Set for CBA including IL-2, IL-4, IL-17, IL-10, TNFα and IFNγ. Analysis
`was carried out using CellQuest and CBA BD software. The detection
`limits were: IL-8: 3.6 pg/ml; IL-1β: 7.2 pg/ml; IL-6: 2.5 pg/ml; IL-10:
`3.3 pg/ml; TNFα: 3.7 pg/ml and IL-12p70: 1.9 pg/ml for the Human
`Inflamation kit and IL-2: 5.6 pg/ml; IL-4: 0.7 pg/ml; IL-17: 0.3 pg/ml;
`IL-10: 0.13 pg/ml; TNFα: 0.7 pg/ml and IFNγ: 0.8 pg/ml for the Flex
`Set.
`
`2.8. Statistical analysis
`
`The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normal
`distribution of the data. Cytokine levels were not normally distributed
`and then differences between cell treatments were evaluated by a non
`parametric test. Due to the existence of genetically determined
`differences between individuals in cytokine production, Wilcoxon or
`Kendall W tests for related samples were used. Differences in
`proliferative responses and expression levels of maturation markers
`(MFI) among different bifidobacteria strains were evaluated by Kendall
`W test and t test for paired data. Results were represented by mean±
`standard deviation or by median and interquartil range. The SPSS 15.0
`statistical software package (SPSS Inc) was used for all determinations
`and a value of p b0.05 was considered significant.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Differential activation of dendritic cells by Bifidobacterium sp
`
`The effect of bifidobacteria on in vitro DC function was evaluated by
`analyzing maturation and cytokine production of immature monocyte-
`derived DCs exposed during 48 h to twelve different Bifidobacterium
`strains, Escherichia coli LMG 2092T or Lactococcus lactis IL594, a widely
`used food microorganism isolated from a cheese starter. Results were
`compared with that of immature DCs cultured in medium alone or with
`LPS, habitually used to induce in vitro DC maturation. To determine the
`possible stimulating effect of molecules secreted by bifidobacteria,
`immature DCs were also treated with cell-free culture supernatants.
`The maturation pattern of DCs was assessed by flow cytometric
`analysis of surface marker expression (Fig. 1A), determining down-
`regulation of CD1a and upregulation of CD40, CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR
`upon stimulation with UV-killed bacteria (bacteria:cell ratio 10:1) or
`their cell-free culture supernatants (10%). Results obtained with LPS
`treatment were used as reference for maturation. Fig. 1B shows that all
`bacterial strains included in the study up-regulated the expression of
`HLA-DR and costimulatory molecules (p b0.05, t test for paired samples;
`n=6) at similar or even higher levels to those observed with LPS.
`However, significant differences can be observed on the expression
`levels of maturation markers among different bifidobacteria (CD1a:
`p=0.003; CD40: p=0.0003; CD80: p=1.30 10− 6; CD86: p=0.0004;
`HLA-DR: p=0.002, Kendall W test). Remarkably, two different strains
`of Bifidobacterium bifidum, IF 10/10 and LMG11041, showed significant
`differences in their ability to induce DCs maturation (p b0.05 for CD40,
`CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR, t test for paired samples; n=6). On the other
`hand, cell-free culture supernatants were, in general, poor inducers of
`DC maturation and did not show significant differences with respect to
`MRSc values (Fig. 1C).
`
`Genome Ex. 1038
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`160
`
`P. López et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`Fig. 1. Phenotype and maturation status of monocyte-derived DC stimulated by Bifidobacterium strains or their supernatants. Immature DCs were cultured with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as
`maturation control and E. coli, L. lactis IL594 or different bifidobacteria strains at a bacteria:cell ratio of 10:1. After 48 h expression of CD14, CD40, CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR was analyzed by
`flow cytometry. (A) Representative profile of DC before (immature DCs) and after 48 h of culture with a bifidobacteria strain (B. bifidum A8). Empty histograms show background staining
`with isotype control mAbs, and solid histograms represent the specific staining of the indicated cell surface marker in immature and Bifidobacterium-stimulated DC. Mean fluorescence
`intensities (MFI) obtained after subtracting background staining are provided in each histogram. (B) Median and interquartil range of MFI expression of each cell surface marker in DC
`stimulated with diverse strains of UV-killed bacteria or (C) with their cell-free culture supernatants during 48 h. MFI levels after LPS stimulation was used as positive control of maturation
`(discontinuous line). Shown are results of six independent experiments performed with different blood donors. Differences on the expression levels of maturation markers between
`Bifidobacterium-stimulated DC and RPMI-stimulated DC was tested by t test for paired samples, whereas differences among different bifidobacteria were performed by Kendall W test.
`
`In addition to costimulatory molecule expression, DC competence to
`generate specific immune responses depends on the cytokine produc-
`tion profile. Thus, we further quantified the amount of IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β,
`IL-10, TNFα and IL-12 present in culture supernatants of DCs exposed to
`these bacteria. Cytokine quantification was carried out after 48 h of
`culture by a multiplex immunoassay. Due to the weak effect of bacterial
`supernatants on DC maturation, cytokine production in these cultures
`was not determined. As can be observed in Fig. 2A, no cytokine
`production was detected in unexposed DCs, whereas LPS (from E. coli)
`
`treatment only produced significant amounts of IL-8 and IL-6. However,
`E. coli and the whole set of Bifidobacterium strains tested induced the
`production of all studied cytokines, but to different degrees. No relevant
`differences were observed in the production of IL-8 (p=0.207, Kendall
`test) and IL-6 (p=0.192), but, interestingly, independently of the
`donor, the variety of bifidobacterial strains differed substantially in their
`capacities to induce IL-1β (p = 0.041),
`IL-10 (p = 0.001), TNFα
`(p=0.008) and IL-12 (p=0.008). Given that several bacteria are potent
`inducers of both proinflammatory and immunosuppressor cytokines,
`
`Genome Ex. 1038
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`P. López et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`161
`
`Fig. 2. DC cytokine profile induced by exposure to Bifidobacterium strains. Immature DCs were cultured with 12 bifidobacterial strains, E. coli, L. lactis or LPS (bacteria:cell ratio 5:1)
`and the supernatants were recollected after 48 h for measuring the production of IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, TNFα and IL-12 by multiplex assay. Independent ratios were calculated from
`each donor. Data represent median and interquartil range of five independent experiments performed with different blood donors. Differences among different bacterial strains
`were evaluated by Kendall W test: IL-8, p =0.207; IL-6, p=0.192; IL-1β, p =0.041; IL-10, p =0.001; TNFα, p =0.008; IL-12, p=0.008; TNFα/IL-10, p=0.444; IL-10/IL-12,
`p =0.006; IL-1β/IL-12, p=0.022.
`
`in an attempt to predict
`i.e. E. coli and B. bifidum LMG11041,
`subsequently DC-mediated Th cell responses, we calculated ratios
`between cytokines that are relevant for T cell differentiation, for instance,
`TNFα/IL-10, IL-10/IL-12 and IL-1β/IL-12 (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, analysis
`of these cytokine relations showed important differences among bacterial
`strains. Thus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and IPLA 4549,
`Bifidobacterium longum IF 3/6 and BM 6/2 and, to a lesser extent, B.
`bifidum LMG11041 exhibit high TNFα/IL-10 and low IL-10/IL-12 ratios in
`addition to an elevated IL-12 production. Therefore, it is reasonable to
`expect that DCs exposed to these strains may promote the induction of
`Th1 responses. An opposite cytokine profile was observed in the
`supernatant of DCs stimulated with Bifidobacterium breve LMG13208, in
`which the elevated IL-10/IL-12 ratio was suggestive of promoting a Th2
`polarization. Nevertheless, its low IL-12 production also results in an
`elevated IL-1β/IL-12 relation, indicative of a possible Th17 induction.
`Notably, L22, A8 and IF 10/10 strains of B. bifidum, in addition to E. coli,
`generated an elevated IL-1β/IL-12 ratio, suggestive of favouring a Th17
`polarization. Of note, DC cultured with B. bifidum IF 10/10 consistently
`exhibited a weak ability for cytokine production, in accordance with their
`low capacity for inducing DC maturation, whereas the LMG11041 strain of
`the same species stimulated DCs to produce high amounts of a wide
`spectrum of cytokines, also in line with DC maturation data. All these
`results indicate that Bifidobacterium are able to maturate and fully activate
`DCs, inducing a particular cytokine synthesis profile that is strain-
`dependent.
`
`3.2. Proliferation and cytokine production of peripheral blood mononuclear
`cells stimulated with bifidobacteria were strain-specific
`
`Most Bifidobacterium sp. are commensal microorganisms usually
`present in the gut of adult individuals and thus probably interact with
`
`immune cells. Therefore, to evaluate in vitro the possible consequences
`of these interactions, PBMCs were used as a responder population to
`determine cellular proliferation and cytokine production after bifido-
`bacteria stimulation. Thus, PBMCs isolated from healthy individuals
`were stimulated with UV-killed Bifidobacterium strains, E. coli, L. lactis or
`the non commensal non pathogenic psychrophilic bacteria P. antarc-
`ticus, used as a negative control for memory T cell responses (bacteria:
`cell ratio 5:1), as well as with their cell-free culture supernatants (10%).
`Proliferation and cytokine production were quantified in these cultures.
`Results showed that all bacterial strains were low inducers of
`lymphocyte proliferation (see Supplementary file 1), as was expected
`for an Ag-induced assay, and only a significant proliferative response
`was obtained with B. animalis subsp. lactis IPLA 4549 (p=0.029, t test
`for paired samples) and 4549dox (p=0.033) and with B. longum BM 6/2
`(p=0.048). PBMCs stimulated with cell-free bacterial culture super-
`natants did not show significant proliferative responses in any case
`(data not shown).
`Subsequently, to determine the pattern of cytokine expression
`induced by different Bifidobacterium strains, the amount of Th1 (IFNγ,
`TNFα and IL-2), Th2 (IL-4 and IL-10) and Th17 (IL-17) cytokines was
`determined in the supernatants of bacteria-stimulated PBMCs recov-
`ered after 4 days of culture, prior to 3[H]T addition to determine cellular
`proliferation. Due to the weak effect of bacterial supernatants, cytokines
`were not measured in these cultures. We found that, although the levels
`of produced cytokines varied among donors, the overall cytokine
`pattern for each bacterial strain seemed to be donor independent
`(Fig. 3). Undetectable or very low levels of IL-4 were produced by most
`cultures whereas all of them produced IL-2. All bacteria tested induced
`significant IL-10 secretion compared with the medium (p b0.05,
`Wilcoxon tests), but to varying degrees. However, the most notable
`differences were observed in the production of IL-17, IFNγ and TNFα.
`
`Genome Ex. 1038
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`162
`
`P. López et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 138 (2010) 157–165
`
`Fig. 3. Profile of cytokine production by PBMCs stimulated with bifidobacteria. PBMCs were cultured in the absence or presence of LPS, and UV-killed E. coli, L. lactis or twelve
`Bifidobacterium strains at a bacteria:cell ratio of 5:1, and supernatants were recovered at day 4. IL-4, IL-2, IL-10, IL-17, IFNγ and TNFα cytokine levels were measured by multiplex
`assay (Flex set CBA). Bars represent median and interquartil range of five independent experiments performed with different blood donors. Differences were evaluated by Wilcoxon
`or Kendall W tests for related samples. Differences between medium and Bifidobacterium-stimulated PBMCs were evaluated by Wilcoxon test for related samples.
`
`Thus, compared with the medium, B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12, IPLA
`4549 and 4549dOx and B. longum BM 6/2 and NCIMB8809 strains
`induced the secretion of large amounts of IFNγ (p=0.019, p=0.030,
`p=0.019, p=0.012, p=0.090, respectively) and TNFα (p=0.003,
`p = 0.009, p = 0.002, p = 0.0004, p b0.0001), respectively, but not of
`IL-17, suggesting a Th1 profile that was consistent with the cytokine
`pattern exhibited by DCs treated with the same bacteria. On the
`contrary, the strains of B. bifidum IF 10/10, A8 and L22 induced poor
`secretion of these cytokines but exhibited the highest capacities for
`IL-17 production (p = 0.020, p = 0.089, and p = 0.118, respectively),
`once again in accordance with data from DCs cultures (high IL-1β/IL-
`12 ratio).
`
`4. Discussion
`
`It is widely accepted that intestinal microbiota possesses immuno-
`modulatory capacity and plays an important role for the health of the
`host. Elucidation of the mechanisms by which intestinal microorgan-
`isms, including potential probiotics, modulate the immune system may
`facilitate implementation of probiotic supplements that are individually
`tailored for their immunoregulatory properties. In this regard, DC
`activation after bacterial stimulation is a pivotal factor for the generation
`of immune responses. These cells are found in immature status at
`different sites in the gastrointestinal tract. Contact with antigens or
`inflammatory stimuli
`induces their maturation, accompanied by
`functional and phenotypic changes such as upregulation of costimula-
`tory molecules and increase in cytokine production (Joffre et al., 2009).
`Moreover, the nature of the maturation agent may determine the
`pattern of cytokine production that, subsequently, will direct the
`polarization of naive T cells toward different subtypes of effector
`lymphocytes (Zhu and Paul, 2008). Thus, it appears reasonable to
`assume that intestinal probiotics could exert immunoregulatory effects
`by affecting the Th1, Th2, Th17 or regulatory T cell-promoting capacity
`of DCs in the gut.
`Bifidobacterium strains are among the most relevant probiotic and
`intestinal microorganisms. In the present study we examined the
`effect of 12 Bifidobacterium strains belonging to 4 different species on
`the activation pattern of human monocyte-derived DCs, demonstrat-
`ing their ability to upregulate phenotypic maturation markers and to
`induce cytokine production in a species and strain-specific manner.
`Moreover, study of cytokine production by PBMCs exposed to the
`different Bifidobacterium strains confirmed the specific profile of these
`probiotics in the polarization of the immune responses. A few works
`on the effects of bifidobacteria on human immunocompetent cells
`have been carried out previously (Boyle et al., 2006; Young et al.,
`2004) but, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study
`
`analyzing immune responses on human DCs and PBMCs comparing a
`relatively large number of bifidobacterial strains from different
`species.
`In concordance with previous works (Baba et al., 2008; Hart et al.,
`2004; Young et al., 2004; Zeuthen et al., 2006), our results show that all
`bifidobacterial strains are able to induce full DC maturation, although
`significant differences can be observed on the expression levels of
`maturation markers among different strains. In contrast, cell-free
`culture supernatants were poor inducers of DC maturation, suggesting
`the absence or scarcity of relevant amounts of secreted immune
`activating molecules in the culture conditions used in this work. On the
`other hand, although different bifidobacteria elicited a common DC
`mature phenotype, important differences were observed in the pattern
`of cytokine production. In fact, bacterial strains could be categorized into
`different groups according to the amount of cytokines they triggered in
`DCs. We found that a common feature of all tested DC-stimuli, including
`the LPS used as a positive control for maturation, was their ability to
`significantly increase IL-6 and IL-8 production compared with non
`stimulated immature DCs. LPS treatment, h

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket