throbber
IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`The Microbiome in Infectious
`Disease and Inflammation
`Kenya Honda1 and Dan R. Littman2,3
`1Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo,
`Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; email: kenya@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
`2Molecular Pathogenesis Program, 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Kimmel
`Center for Biology and Medicine of the Skirball Institute, New York University School of
`Medicine, New York, NY 10016; email: Dan.Littman@med.nyu.edu
`
`Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012. 30:759–95
`
`First published online as a Review in Advance on
`January 6, 2012
`
`The Annual Review of Immunology is online at
`immunol.annualreviews.org
`
`This article’s doi:
`10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074937
`Copyright c(cid:2) 2012 by Annual Reviews.
`All rights reserved
`
`0732-0582/12/0423-0759$20.00
`
`Keywords
`intestinal microbiota, Th17 cells, Treg cells, innate lymphoid cells,
`segmented filamentous bacteria, Clostridium
`
`Abstract
`The mammalian alimentary tract harbors hundreds of species of
`commensal microorganisms (microbiota) that intimately interact with
`the host and provide it with genetic, metabolic, and immunological
`attributes. Recent reports have indicated that the microbiota compo-
`sition and its collective genomes (microbiome) are major factors in
`predetermining the type and robustness of mucosal immune responses.
`In this review, we discuss the recent advances in our understanding of
`host-microbiota interactions and their effect on the health and disease
`susceptibility of the host.
`
`759
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 1 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The tissues of the gastrointestinal tract have
`the unique property of harboring an enormous
`number of microbes within the lumen. The
`concentration of microbes that reside in the
`small intestine is estimated to be from 103 to
`109
`cells/ml, whereas
`the large intestine
`contains abundant bacteria, which achieve a
`concentration of up to 1011 or 1012 cells/g of lu-
`minal contents (1). This concentration is similar
`to or even higher than that achieved in colonies
`growing under optimum conditions on labora-
`tory plates, indicating that the colonic lumen
`provides a safe and nourishing environment and
`represents an extremely efficient natural biore-
`actor for bacteria. The estimated total number
`of bacteria carried by a healthy human in the gut
`is 1014, which, as a whole, constitutes the micro-
`biota (also referred to as the microbial flora), an
`ecosystem in dynamic equilibrium. The mem-
`bers of the intestinal microbiota can be catego-
`rized as either allochthonous or autochthonous
`(1, 2). Allochthonous bacteria
`are only
`transiently present, whereas autochthonous
`bacteria are indigenous and preferentially
`colonize physical spaces or niches in particular
`animal species. In most cases, indigenous bacte-
`ria can attach to the epithelium or mucus layer
`and form a biofilm, and thereby significantly
`affect host development and physiology.
`The microbiota allows for optimal break-
`down of
`foods, uptake of nutrients, and
`enhancement of intestinal development, which
`have led to diet diversification and increased
`evolutionary fitness. Beyond digestion and
`metabolism, the microbiota also contributes to
`development and maintenance of the intestinal
`epithelial barrier, development of the immune
`system, and competition with pathogenic
`microorganisms, thus preventing their prop-
`agation. Indeed, studies of germfree (GF)
`animals indicate that intestinal microbes pro-
`foundly affect the development of the mucosal
`immune system in terms of the organization
`of Peyer’s patches (PPs) and isolated lymphoid
`follicles
`(ILFs),
`secretion of antimicrobial
`peptides by epithelial cells, and accumulation
`
`Honda· Littman
`
`of various immunocytes at mucosal sites (3–7).
`Collectively, the gut microbiota provides an
`indispensable internal ecosystem for numer-
`ous host physiological processes and can be
`considered to have coevolved with the host to
`form a superorganism (8).
`The collective genome of intestinal mi-
`crobes, termed the microbiome, is estimated
`to contain at least 100 times more genes
`than our own genome (9). Unlike the human
`genome, which is rarely altered by xenobiotic
`intervention, the gut microbiota composition is
`readily changeable by diet, antibiotic ingestion,
`infection by pathogens, and other life events.
`The plasticity of the microbiome has been
`implicated in numerous disease conditions, and
`an unfavorable alteration of the gut microbiota
`composition is called dysbiosis, which includes
`an outgrowth of potential pathogenic bacteria
`(pathobionts) and a decrease in the number
`of beneficial bacteria (10, 11). Multiple recent
`reports have shown a link between dysbiosis
`and immune disorders. Crohn’s disease and
`ulcerative colitis are two chronic intestinal
`inflammatory conditions referred to as in-
`flammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD is a
`disease with an elusive etiology, and although
`many potential triggers have been invoked,
`one attractive hypothesis is that IBD may be
`a result of dysbiosis in the intestinal microbial
`community that promotes the overgrowth of
`bacteria that aberrantly stimulate the intestinal
`immune system. Indeed, many reports have
`shown that the microbial populations in the in-
`testine of IBD patients are different from those
`of healthy individuals (12–14). Accumulating
`evidence suggests that a change in the gut
`microbiota composition has a key role not only
`in IBD, but also in the development of systemic
`immune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis
`(15, 16), encephalomyelitis (17, 18), type 1
`diabetes (19, 20), and allergic diseases (21, 22).
`The microbiota affects the host immune sys-
`tem through multiple factors, which include
`microbial components and their metabolites.
`The immune system recognizes these factors
`mostly through innate immune receptors. Con-
`stitutive signaling induced by the microbiota
`
`GF: germfree
`PP: Peyer’s patch
`ILF: isolated
`lymphoid follicle
`Microbiome:
`a genetic catalog of the
`microbial species that
`inhabit a defined
`environment such as
`the human body
`Dysbiosis:
`a condition with
`imbalance in the
`composition of the
`bacterial microbiota;
`this includes an
`outgrowth of
`potentially pathogenic
`bacteria and/or a
`decrease in bacterial
`diversity and bacteria
`beneficial to the host
`Pathobiont:
`a symbiont or a
`commensal that is able
`to promote pathology
`only when genetic or
`environmental
`conditions are altered
`in the host
`IBD: inflammatory
`bowel disease
`
`760
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 2 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`LTi: lymphoid tissue
`inducer
`Gnotobiote:
`gnotobiotic comes
`from the Greek
`“known life” and refers
`to animals with defined
`microbiological status
`MetaHIT
`(Metagenomics of
`the Human
`Intestinal Tract)
`consortium: the
`MetaHIT project aims
`to understand the role
`of the human intestinal
`microbiota in health
`and disease; the
`consortium involves 13
`research centers from
`eight countries
`
`keeps the intestinal mucosa in a state of phys-
`iological inflammation, with continuous pro-
`duction of tissue repair factors, antimicrobial
`proteins, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) that, to-
`gether, maintain intestinal barrier integrity and
`provide beneficial functions to the microbiota
`(23–25). Without constitutive innate signaling,
`intestinal barrier injury and bacterial translo-
`cation may occur. Innate immune recognition
`of the microbiota leads to the establishment of
`an arsenal of unique and diverse intestinal im-
`mune cell populations. IgA-producing plasma
`cells, intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and
`T cell receptor (TCR) γδ-expressing T cells
`(γδ T cells) are the classically known lym-
`phocytes unique to the mucosa. Recent stud-
`ies have shown the presence of innate immune
`lymphocytes, such as CD4+CD3− lymphoid
`tissue–inducer cells (LTi cells) and interleukin
`(IL)-22-producing natural killer (NK)-like cells
`(26, 27). Furthermore, CD4+ T cells in the
`intestinal mucosa comprise significant num-
`bers of IL-17-expressing cells (Th17 cells) and
`forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)-expressing regulatory
`T cells (Treg cells) (28). All these cells are
`particularly abundant in the intestinal mucosa,
`even under steady-state conditions, and their
`accumulation and function are deeply affected
`by the presence of the microbiota.
`Although it is not fully understood why and
`how the intestinal microbiota generates such
`a large variety of immune cell populations, re-
`cent studies using gnotobiotes (animals with a
`defined microbiological status) have suggested
`that specific components of the microbiota
`induce specific populations of immune cells.
`Below, we summarize the recent findings on
`how members of the microbiota provide an
`intestinal environment uniquely suited for the
`well-balanced development of the innate and
`adaptive immune system and discuss the role
`of the microbiota in infectious diseases and
`inflammation.
`
`COMPOSITION OF
`THE MICROBIOME
`The establishment of the intestinal microbiota
`occurs progressively, beginning immediately
`
`after birth. The initial infant gut microbiota
`has a relatively simple composition, which is af-
`fected in large part by the maternal microbiota.
`Vaginally delivered infants acquire bacterial
`communities resembling their own mother’s
`vaginal microbiota, dominated by Lactobacillus,
`Prevotella, or Sneathia spp., whereas infants de-
`livered by Cesarean section harbor bacterial
`communities similar to those found on the skin
`surface, dominated by Staphylococcus, Corynebac-
`terium, and Propionibacterium spp. (29). These
`pioneer bacteria may affect the composition of
`adult flora. After the weaning period, however,
`the microbiota markedly changes, and obligate
`anaerobes become prominent, with much lower
`numbers of facultative anaerobes.
`Only four phyla dominate adult human in-
`testinal habitats (30). Most (>90%) of them be-
`long to Bacteroidetes (including Bacteroides) and
`Firmicutes (including Clostridium, Lactobacillus,
`and Bacillus). Firmicute bacteria in the gut
`include two major clostridial groups, namely
`the clostridial clusters IV and XIVa that com-
`prise the Lachnospiraceae. Lower-abundance
`phyla are mainly composed of Proteobacteria
`(including Escherichia) and Actinobacteria (in-
`cluding Bifidobacterium). The mouse intestinal
`microbiota is similar to the human microbiota
`in broad terms. Such limited phylum predomi-
`nance suggests the presence of strong selective
`forces over thousands, perhaps even millions,
`of years of coevolution. Notably, certain mem-
`bers of the Firmicutes, such as Clostridium and
`Bacillus genera, are found in a state of vegetative
`growth or as spores. The ability to make spores
`may be of ecological advantage to the organ-
`ism as it enables it to survive under adverse
`conditions to efficiently colonize the intestine.
`At lower taxonomic levels, there is consid-
`erable interindividual variation. Metagenomic
`approaches using massive parallel sequencing
`allow for the direct enumeration of the micro-
`biota without having to isolate and cultivate
`bacteria. Using this technology, the interna-
`tional MetaHIT (Metagenomics of the Human
`Intestinal Tract) project has recently reported
`that each human individual carries on average
`540,000 common genes in the intestine (9).
`
`www.annualreviews.org • Microbiome and Inflammation
`
`761
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 3 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`This estimate suggests that only approximately
`35% of bacterial genes are shared between
`individuals.
`Interestingly,
`the results
`from
`the MetaHIT consortium also suggested the
`existence of at least three enterotypes in the
`human population (31). Enterotypes, which
`can be compared to blood types, are defined by
`characteristic populations of bacterial species
`and the genes that they encode. It is not yet
`known how enterotypes affect metabolism or
`immune system homeostasis in the host.
`The microbiome is adaptable to environ-
`mental changes and host genotypes. Recent
`studies have shown that community mem-
`bership and function of the microbiota can
`change owing to numerous variables including
`lifestyle, hygiene, diet, and use of antibiotics
`(32). Furthermore, it has recently become clear
`that the composition of the microbiota can
`influence onset and/or progression of several
`diseases. Indeed, the respective levels of the two
`main intestinal phyla, the Bacteroidetes and
`Firmicutes, are linked to obesity and metabolic
`disorders, both in humans and mice (33, 34).
`There has also been a substantial increase in
`the number of reports showing the relationship
`between the microbiota composition and the
`incidence of chronic inflammatory disease,
`including allergic conditions and autoimmune
`disorders
`(15–22). Furthermore,
`transplan-
`tation experiments in which the microbiota
`of diseased animals is grafted into healthy
`recipients have demonstrated the transfer of
`several disease phenotypes. These include obe-
`sity, metabolic disorders, and chronic colitis
`(35–37), all of which have complex etiologies
`affected by host genetic and environmental
`factors. Therefore, a better understanding of
`the functional properties of individual mem-
`bers of the microbiota is increasingly relevant
`to the treatment of complex chronic diseases.
`
`Factors that Affect Community
`Membership of Microbiota
`Diet. Diet
`important
`is one of
`the most
`factors shaping microbial diversity in the gut.
`Because members of
`the microbiota have
`their own substrate preference and there is
`
`Honda· Littman
`
`intense competition for resources, alterations
`in the components of the diet, particularly
`the type and quantity of
`fat and polysac-
`charides, result
`in changes
`in community
`composition and function of the microbiota.
`Mouse studies revealed that
`feeding mice
`with a high-fat and high-carbohydrate diet
`(Western diet) resulted in an increase in the
`number of bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum
`and a decrease in that of bacteria of the
`Bacteroidetes phylum (38, 39). This increase
`in the number of Firmicutes was mainly due to
`the proliferation of the Erysipelotrichaceae
`family (38, 39). The abundance of this family
`of bacteria immediately diminished when the
`diet was changed to a diet low in fat and rich in
`plant polysaccharides. The decrease in the pro-
`portion of Firmicutes after a low-calorie diet
`was similarly observed in humans (40). Another
`human study of 19 obese volunteers showed
`that a decreased carbohydrate intake led to a
`decrease in the number of bacteria within a
`specific group of Firmicutes that included Rose-
`buria spp. and Eubacterium rectale (41). Diet also
`influences fecal community enterotypes in hu-
`man subjects (42). Individuals with long-term
`diets rich in protein and animal fat had an
`enterotype dominated by Bacteroides, whereas
`those on high carbohydrate diets had a preva-
`lence of Prevotella. Although change in diet
`resulted in a rapid change in microbiota, this
`was not sufficient to shift the enterotype during
`a 10-day course. A similar distribution of fecal
`enterotypes was observed in a comparison of
`European and African children, who have diets
`rich in protein/animal fat and carbohydrates,
`respectively (43). Whether enterotypes asso-
`ciated with long-term diets can be reversed by
`changes in the diet remains to be determined.
`Changes
`in the diet and accompanied
`alterations in community membership of the
`microbiota, whether chronic or short-term,
`lead to changes in the gene expression profiles
`of the microbiota. For instance, alterations
`in availability of diet polysaccharides result in
`changes in the expression of genes for carbo-
`hydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), including
`glycoside
`hydrolases
`and
`polysaccharide
`
`762
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 4 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`SCFA: short-chain
`fatty acid
`DC: dendritic cell
`
`lyases, in members of the microbiota, such as
`thetaiotaomicron (44). Seaweeds
`Bacteroides
`are major components of the Japanese diet;
`Bacteroides plebeius residing in the gut of
`Japanese individuals acquired the genes of
`enzymes
`that can metabolize the sulfated
`polysaccharide porphyran of marine algae
`through the horizontal transfer from marine
`bacteria naturally colonizing dietary seaweeds
`(45). These changes in gene expression of
`constituents of the microbiota likely ensure
`that the microbial community can adapt to
`dietary changes and maximize energy harvest,
`while contributing to host fitness.
`In some cases, changes in the diet and
`subsequent alterations in the microbiome may
`exert a detrimental effect on host physiology.
`Indeed, in individuals having a high-fat and
`high-carbohydrate diet, the microbiota is more
`heavily enriched with bacteria of the phylum
`Firmicutes and less with those of the phylum
`Bacteroidetes, and this condition may be more
`efficient at extracting energy from a given diet
`compared with the microbiota of lean indi-
`viduals (33). This suggests a positive-feedback
`mechanism,
`in which an obesity-inducing
`diet can change the composition of the gut
`microbiota, which results in a shape of the
`microbiome more capable of extracting energy
`from the diet, thereby helping perpetuate obe-
`sity. It has been postulated that changes in the
`diet and associated changes in the gut micro-
`biota may also lead to immune disorders (46). In
`fact, allergies and asthma are almost completely
`nonexistent in certain rural African communi-
`ties, where people eat diets low in protein and
`animal fat and high in plant polysaccharides.
`Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes are more
`abundant in African (Burkina Faso) than in
`EU children’s microbiota, whereas Firmicutes
`and Proteobacteria are more abundant in EU
`than in African children (43). Importantly,
`the microbiome of African children exhibits
`a higher microbial richness and biodiversity
`than that of EU children. The African sam-
`ples, but not the EU samples, contain two
`bacterial genera, Prevotella and Xylanibacter
`(43). These findings are consistent with the
`
`above-described diet/enterotype concept (42)
`and suggest that the African microbiomes are
`dominated by the Prevotella enterotype driven
`by the low-fat/high-fiber diet. Prevotella and
`Xylanibacter have enzymes necessary for the hy-
`drolysis of cellulose and xylan and contribute to
`the production of high amounts of short-chain
`fatty acids (SCFAs) (43). As discussed below,
`SCFAs contribute to the maintenance of im-
`mune homeostasis in the intestine. Therefore,
`changes in the diet and gut microbial ecology
`are likely to affect the metabolic predisposition
`and immune status of the host.
`
`Inflammation. Alterations
`community
`in
`membership can also be induced by inflam-
`mation. In mice, enteric pathogens such as
`Citrobacter rodentium and Salmonella enterica
`subspecies 1 serovar Typhimurium actively
`induce intestinal inflammation, which then al-
`ters the composition of indigenous microbiota,
`reducing the number of strict anaerobes such
`as the Firmicutes and allowing proteobacteria
`to proliferate (47, 48). Intestinal inflammation
`caused by either a chemical inducer, such as
`dextran sulfate sodium (DSS), or a genetic
`deficiency, such as Il10 deficiency, can also alter
`the composition of the intestinal microbiota,
`resulting in a reduction in both the total
`number of resident
`intestinal bacteria and
`bacterial diversity (47). Studies have shown a
`change in composition of the microbiota in
`T-bet−/− Rag2−/− ulcerative colitis (TRUC)
`mice, which have a T-bet deficiency in the
`innate immune system and develop spon-
`taneous colitis with high penetrance on a
`BALB/c background (36, 49). TRUC colitis
`is attributed to the hyperproduction of tumor
`necrosis factor (TNF)-α by dendritic cells
`(DCs), because T-bet is a negative regulator
`of TNF-α transcription (36). The colitis in
`TRUC mice is accompanied by a considerable
`alteration in microbial composition. TRUC
`colitis can be transmitted to wild-type mice
`when they are cross-fostered or cohoused
`with TRUC mice (36). Detailed analysis
`of altered microbiota has revealed a lower
`proportional
`representation of Firmicutes,
`
`www.annualreviews.org • Microbiome and Inflammation
`
`763
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 5 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`Probiotics: live
`microorganisms that,
`when administered in
`adequate amounts,
`confer a health benefit
`to the host
`IEC: intestinal
`epithelial cell
`TLR: Toll-like
`receptor
`
`764
`
`including Clostridium spp., and the constitutive
`presence of colitogenic bacteria, such as Proteus
`mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae (50), which
`are otherwise transient allochthonous bacteria
`and constitute very minor, if any, components
`of
`the microbiota. Interestingly, colitis in
`TRUC mice is improved by the consumption
`of a fermented milk product containing a
`probiotic strain, Bifidobacterium lactis
`(51).
`Consumption of B. lactis results in a change
`in the structure of the microbiota, namely, an
`increase in the number of lactate-consuming
`Desulfovibrio spp. and the butyrate-producing
`Anaerostipes caccae subgroup and Eubacterium
`hallii, accompanied by a decrease in cecal
`pH and increases in acetic, propionic, and
`butyric acid levels. These conditions provide a
`nonpermissive environment for the colitogenic
`Proteus and Klebsiella in TRUC mice. These
`results suggest that inflammation mediated by
`the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines,
`such as TNF-α, leads to an increase in pH
`and a decrease in the amount of SCFAs in
`the intestinal lumen, resulting in an altered
`microbial community, including outgrowth of
`potentially pathogenic bacteria. Collectively,
`much like the positive-feedback mechanism
`in diet-mediated obesity described above,
`intestinal inflammation caused by infection or
`genetic predisposition can render the shape
`of the microbiome more prone to induce
`inflammation. This vicious cycle of dysbiosis
`and inflammation may be operative in IBD
`patients.
`IBD patients exhibit substantial changes
`in the composition of
`the microbiota. A
`decrease in the numbers of bifidobacteria and
`lactobacilli in IBD patients has been known for
`many years (52). Overgrowth of Escherichia coli,
`the so-called adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC)
`in particular, is frequently observed in human
`IBD patients and is considered to lead to the ag-
`gravation of disease symptoms. AIECs interact
`intimately with the inflamed ileal mucosa and
`even invade intestinal epithelial cells (IECs)
`(53, 54). Recent studies using high-throughput
`sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes have
`shown that there is a decrease in Bacteroidetes
`
`Honda· Littman
`
`and Firmicutes frequencies and an increase in
`Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria frequencies
`in IBD patients. In particular, it was shown
`that the family Lachnospiraceae, which com-
`prises the Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa [also
`known as Clostridium leptum and coccoides groups
`(55)], was significantly less abundant in IBD
`patients than in healthy subjects (13). Other
`reports have provided data showing a reduction
`in the number of bacteria within the Clostridium
`cluster IV, particularly the species Faecalibac-
`terium prausnitzii, in the gut of IBD patients
`(56, 57) and a correlation between low counts of
`F. prausnitzii and postsurgical recurrence (58).
`Importantly, individuals with chronic in-
`flammation have a lower bacterial diversity of
`the microbiota than healthy individuals. The
`MetaHIT consortium reported that IBD pa-
`tients harbored, on average, 25% fewer genes
`than individuals not suffering from IBD (9). Al-
`though it remains unclear whether the decrease
`in microbial membership is a causative factor
`or a consequence of chronic inflammation in
`IBD patients, maintaining the diversity of the
`gut microbial community is likely a prerequisite
`for a stable and healthy gastrointestinal tract.
`
`Host genotype. Host genotype can intrinsi-
`cally affect the composition of the microbiota.
`For instance, genetically obese mice, such as
`ob/ob mice (leptin gene deficiency), have an
`altered microbiota with increased Firmicutes
`and decreased Bacteroidetes frequencies (33).
`Importantly, gut microbiota transferred from
`ob/ob mice to wild-type GF mice can induce
`obesity, presumably owing to the fact that
`obesity-associated microbes can extract more
`energy from the diet, which suggests that
`a change in the microbiota by leptin gene
`deficiency may precede the obesity phenotype
`of ob/ob mice (33). Mice deficient in Toll-
`like receptor 5 (Tlr5−/−) similarly exhibit a
`change in the shape of the microbiota (35).
`Tlr5−/− mice display hyperphagia and signs
`of metabolic syndrome,
`including insulin
`resistance and increased adiposity. Wild-type
`mice inoculated with Tlr5−/− microbiota
`the Tlr5−/− mice, displaying
`phenocopy
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 6 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`LP: lamina propria
`
`hyperphagia and obesity, suggesting that the
`Tlr5−/− phenotype is primarily due to the
`changes in the microbiota. NLRP6, a sensor of
`endogenous or exogenous stress, induces the
`formation of a multimolecular inflammasome
`complex upon binding of unknown ligand,
`leading to activation of caspase-1 and cleavage
`of pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 (37). In IECs, the
`inflammasome-mediated constitutive produc-
`tion of IL-18 is required for the maintenance
`of epithelial cell barrier function and regener-
`ation. NLRP6−/− mice exhibit reduced IL-18
`levels in IECs and are highly susceptible to DSS
`colitis (37). Importantly, NLRP6−/− mice show
`quantitative and qualitative changes in the
`microbiota, including increased representation
`of members of Prevotellaceae and TM7, and
`reductions in members of the genus Lactobacil-
`lus in the Firmicutes phylum. The transmission
`of this microbiota community confers similar
`susceptibility to DSS colitis onto wild-type
`mice. As described above, T-bet−/− Rag2−/−
`TRUC mice also have an abnormal microbial
`composition, and TRUC colitis is transmissible
`to wild-type mice (36). These reports indicate
`that obesogenic or colitogenic microbiota can
`arise in the host depending on the genotype.
`Nonobese diabetic mice lacking Myd88, an
`adaptor molecule for TLRs and IL-1 receptor
`(IL-1R), did not develop type 1 diabetes when
`reared in specific pathogen–free (SPF) con-
`ditions, but littermate Myd88-sufficient mice
`exhibited diabetes under the same conditions
`(19). However, when rendered GF, Myd88−/−
`nonobese diabetic mice developed severe dia-
`betes. Therefore, the attenuated phenotype of
`SPF Myd88−/− nonobese diabetic mice is not
`simply due to a defect in IL-1R or TLR signal-
`ing, but indicates a key role for the microbiota.
`Further analysis revealed that Myd88-deficient
`nonobese diabetic mice exhibit changes in the
`composition of the distal gut microbiota: a sig-
`nificantly lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio
`compared with that of Myd88-sufficient con-
`trol mice (19). Therefore, MyD88-dependent
`signaling affects the composition of the gut
`microbiota, and thereby affects the nonobese
`diabetic phenotype.
`
`The lack of activation-induced cytidine
`deaminase (AID), which results in defective
`class switch recombination and thereby lack
`of IgA-producing plasma cells in the intestine,
`leads to the excessive proliferation of anaero-
`bic bacteria in the small intestine, particularly
`the segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), ac-
`companied by hyperplasia of ILFs (59). The
`addition of IgA prevented the aberrant SFB
`expansion and ILF hyperplasia in the mutant
`mice. Antimicrobial peptides produced by IECs
`also have important roles in controlling the
`growth of components of the microbiota. Thus,
`α-defensin deficiency was associated with de-
`creased Bacteroidetes and increased Firmicutes
`frequencies, whereas the transgenic expression
`of human defensin 5 (HD5) in mice led to
`the reverse shift (60). Transgenic expression of
`HD5 also led to the loss of SFB, with a conse-
`quent decrease in the number of Th17 cells in
`the lamina propria (LP) of the small intestine
`(60) (discussed below).
`including
`Collectively, many diseases,
`metabolic diseases and chronic inflammatory
`conditions, may not be simply associated with
`host genetics, but may be mediated indirectly
`by the change in the microbiota (Figure 1).
`Recent
`genome-wide
`association
`studies
`(GWAS) have revealed more than 100 genetic
`loci that have significant association with IBD
`(61, 62). Several of these genes likely have
`a primary role in shaping the gut microbial
`community, which then affects IBD pathology.
`
`MICROBIAL SIGNALING
`THROUGH THE HOST INNATE
`IMMUNE SYSTEM
`The gut mucosa has evolved multiple layers
`of protection to prevent the translocation of
`pathogenic as well as indigenous microbes. The
`intestinal epithelium is covered with layers of
`mucus, which is composed of mucin glycopro-
`teins synthesized and secreted by goblet cells.
`The inner layer of the mucus gel in the colon
`is densely packed and firmly attached to the ep-
`ithelium and creates a strict barrier that pre-
`vents large particles, including most bacteria,
`
`www.annualreviews.org • Microbiome and Inflammation
`
`765
`
`Genome Ex. 1036
`Page 7 of 39
`
`

`

`IY30CH28-Littman
`
`ARI
`
`17 February 2012
`
`15:18
`
`Causes
`
`Diet
`
`Inflammation
`(Infection, etc.)
`
`Host genotype
`(cid:129)ATG16L1
`(cid:129)NLRP6
`(cid:129)NOD2
`(cid:129)IL-10
`(cid:129)IL-23, etc.
`
`Dysbiosis
`
`Reduced diversity of the
`microbiota
`(cid:129)Decrease of Bacteroidetes
`and Firmicutes
`(cid:129)Increase of Actinobacteria
`and Proteobacteria
`
`Propagation of
`potentially
`pathogenic bacteria
`(cid:129)Adherent-invasive E. coli
`(AIEC)
`(cid:129)Enterotoxigenic strains of
`B. fragilis (ETBF)
`(cid:129)Klebsiella pneumoniae
`(cid:129)Proteus mirabilis
`(cid:129)Prevotellaceae
`(cid:129)TM7
`
`Immunological outcomes
`
`Aberrant activation of
`immune system
`(Activation of Th1,
`Th17, γδ T, and innate
`lymphocytes)
`
`Repression of immune
`regulatory mechanisms
`(Decrease of Treg, Tr1,
`IgA, IL-10 and TGF-β)
`
`Aberrant immune
`responses against
`commensal
`
`microbiota and diet
`
`Chronic inflammation (IBD)
`
`Figure 1
`Causes and pathological outcomes of dysbiosis. The composition of the gut microbiota is readily affected by diet, inflammation
`(including infection by pathogens), and host genotypes. An unfavorable alteration of the community structure of the gut microbiota is
`termed dysbiosis, which includes an outgrowth of potential pathogenic bacteria (pathobionts) and a reduced diversity of the community
`structure of the microbiota. Dysbiosis is associated with the increased predisposition to immune system activation, which leads to
`aberrant immune responses against the commensal microbiota and diet. The dysregulated activation of the immune system leads to the
`worsening of the dysfunction of the microbiota, which may result in sustained inflammation in the intestine (i.e., IBD) and other organs.
`
`from directly contacting the epithelial cells (63).
`The intestinal epithelium is tightly sealed by
`tight junctions and subjacent adherens junc-
`tions, which play critical roles in the prevention
`of microbe invasion (64). The small intestinal
`epithelium contains Paneth cells at the base of
`the crypts, which contribute to innate immunity
`by secreting a diverse repertoire of antimicro-
`bial proteins. Beneath the epithelium, the LP
`contains DCs, which extend their dendrites be-
`tween epithelial cells to continuously monitor
`the gut lumen content and activate LP lympho-
`cytes. These in toto constitute the firewall that
`prevents the systemic penetration and spread of
`microbes (7, 65).
`In the past, immune responses to commensal
`bacteria were considered to be completely pre-
`vented because of the sequestration of micro-
`biota by physical barrier systems. Recent results
`have suggested, however, that constitutive and
`physiological inflammation induced by com-
`mensal microbes through pattern-recognition
`receptors (PRRs) is operative and is required
`for epithelial barrier functions and normal
`host-commensal homeostasis.
`
`Honda· Littman
`
`Constitutive Activation
`of TLRs by Microbiota
`and
`TLRs
`expressed
`by
`hematopoietic
`nonhematopoietic cells are involved in the
`recognition of the microbiota. When mice
`kept
`in SPF conditions are treated with
`broad-spectrum antibiotics,
`they become
`highly susceptible to DSS-induced intestinal
`inflammation (24). This is, at least in part, due
`to reduced constitutive TLR signaling in re-
`sponse to the microbiota, as oral administration
`of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, a TLR4 ligand)
`or lipoteichoic acid (a TLR2 ligand) restores
`resistance of antibiotic-treated mice to DSS-
`associated injury of the colonic epithelium (24).
`Mice lacking either Tlr2, Tlr4, Tlr9, or Myd88
`are highly susceptible to DSS colitis (24, 66).
`Depending on the rearing conditions, mice
`lacking Tlr5 develop spontaneous colitis, and
`bacterial translocation to the spleen and liver
`occurs (67). The absence of MyD88 signaling in
`IECs is associated with a decreased production
`of cytoprotective factors such as IL-6, KC-1,
`and heat shock proteins in IECs (24). TLR2
`
`Pattern-recognition
`receptors (PRRs):
`receptors that
`recognize m

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket