throbber
OUTLOOK
`t-Iuemr'j‘hiiiu
`
`IHE INTERNATIONAL WEEKLY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
`
`Anti tumour immunity
`enhanced by inhibiting
`PD—Ll XPD — I and identifying
`mutant new antigens
`
`natu .
`
`
`
`_-_-"Ill'_'
`
`vi!
`
`'
`
`I
`
`[Jr's
`
`.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`_
`
`v”.
`
`_-III._.
`
`IMMUNE-CHECKPUINT
`
`BLUBKADEIN
`
`, 7 DO NOT REMOVE FROM
`CURRENT PERIODICALS
`
`"
`
`ROOM
`
`PEER REVIEW
`
`MICROSCOPY
`
`ENERGY
`
`9 “m"HE-cm‘IiWUHE
`23" Novembet 20M
`
`ACCEPT YOUR
`OWN PAPER
`Howsume SL‘iEIlEiSI‘SEIi’e
`duping the system
`mm"
`
`THE CASE FOR
`AIMING HIGHER
`Atomic resolution is there
`for the taking
`"“4“?
`
`SIDUUUS $12.99CM-I
`‘NIGHT—TIME,
`4 8>
`.
`.
`COOI INC RV DAV
`GenOme & CO. V. UI'IIV. Of Chlcago
`i‘udiut PG R201 9-00002
`UN IV. CHICAGO EX. 2049
`
`

`

`m—REVIE.WS MICROBIOLOGY
`
`IMatching
`genomic
`sequence
`
`../'
`
`Genomic DNA
`
`RYAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEC 0 3 2014
`
`ngNA
`
`umwsnsmr LIBRARY
`
`FREE POSTER
`
`CRISPR—Cas: extraordinary editing
`
`The CRISPR—Cas system evolved to provide adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea against
`
`invading genetic elements. such as viruses and plasmids. The mechanism of interference is based on
`
`CRISPR RNAs. which are derived from foreign DNA and mediate the detection of invading nucleic acids.
`
`followed by degradation by the Cas proteins. This poster presents the molecular mechanism of CRISPR—
`
`Cas interference and highlights the use of specifically engineered guide RNAs and the Cas9 nuclease for
`
`the editing of virtually any desired genome, in addition to other applications such as imaging in live cells
`
`and the regulation of gene expression.
`
`
`
`0 Download the poster at:
`www.natu re.com/n rmicrofposters!crispr
`
`flitlllflf
`Reviews
`
`
`
`
` ;_'.'_-'._;;-
`
`-_-_-.
`
`,J (JRII‘JENI
`
`Produced with support from
`
`g 0RIGEN E
`
`Your Gene Company
`
`I
`
`nature publishing group @
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`2'? November 2014 J Vol 515 l Issue No 7528
`
`THIS WEEK
`
`NEWS IN FOCUS
`
`COMMENT
`
`48? MICROSCOPY
`Hasten high
`resolution
`Stephen J
`Pennycookde .
`ge’nglVKa’mm
`recrsion
`microscopes are
`needed to analyse
`atoms effectively
`
`
`
`Bflflls 8. INS
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`..
`
`_
`r’ J
`.3!
`'
`‘7 A
`
`
`
`-
`.
`473 EMISSIONS
`US—China deal renews hopes fortaiks
`474 Mi'iRINE SCIENCE
`Data-managementissues delay
`observatory project
`478 NEUROSCIENCE
`FDAconsiders howto regulate
`brain-linked devices
`
`:
`
`.
`I
`'
`I
`
`Elll‘l’llflllls
`465 CLIMATE
`Agree to agree
`Other nations must follow the lead of
`the United States and China
`465 INFECTIIJUS DISEASE
`,
`Ebola opportunity
`Slowdown should be putto good use
`4E5 SPACE
`Moon on a stick
`.
`.
`Crowdfunded mission worth a try
`it
`"Dal.” VIEW
`hr
`45? Open access
`is tiring out peer
`m3“?
`a an ms
`Scholarly system must
`adapt to workload
`
`
`
`
`
`HESEIICH HIGHLIBHTS
`463 SELECTIUNS FROM THE
`SCIENTIHC UTEHMUHE
`
`Termite queen rules roost / North China
`earthquake history / Old papers back in
`vogue / Tagged fish predated / Remote
`
`SEVEN IIAYS
`4m THENEws IN BRIEF
`Oil pipeline rejected / Charity sells
`royalty rights / Holt to head MAS /
`LHC data go open access / Wave—power
`
`companyenters administration /‘Polar
`
`code‘ to regulate ships
`
`C A R E E R 5
`
`597 DWERSITY
`
`Structural approach
`Materials scientists are tryingto
`broaden the range of people
`the field attracts
`
`.
`
`'
`
`4?? M£DICINE
`Clamdewn on clinical-trial reporting
`4m PUBLISHING
`Open-data dictum notalways followed
`479 ECOLOGY
`Galapagos gift-shop closure
`shortchanges conservation
`FEITIIIIES
`
`PUBLISHINC
`
`The peer —
`.
`I'GVIGW scam
`Evidence of self-review exposes
`weaknesses in system mm
`
`4B4 NUCLEMi POWER
`Desperately seeking plutonium
`Dwindling stockpile forces US rethink
`
`
`
` 49!] URNITHCLUCY
`control of epilepsy / Greenland on ice Richard l/an Nooro‘en
`
`
`.
`_.
`'- “i." .
`'
`‘-
`‘
`Er.
`'
`MILITflHYSBIENDE
`-'
`O
`; SP 11 f
`-
`O S or
`-
`SCienCe
`Ann Finkbeiner reviewstwo books on
`
`the legacies of the cold war PIEE 48!
`
`Fowl domination
`
`Ewen Callaway
`491 CLIMflTE SCIENCE
`A climate trance
`
`CORRESPDHBEHBE
`492 Ebola virus control / Brain training in its
`infancy / China's progress in research /
`Philae's marathon achievement
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_ _
`
`Rebecca Birch
`
`FUTURES
`Bill] Ice and
`white roses
`
`2? NOVEMBER 2014 | VOL 515 | NATURE | 459
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`27 November 2014 i Vol 515 l Issue No 7528
`
`RESEARCH
`
`Prime cancer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`I
`
`
`
`ALLISONBRUCE
`
`545
`
`559
`
`temperature under direct sunlight
`A P Ramon, M A Anoma, L Zhu,
`E Rephaeii & S Fan
`
`MOLECULAR ELEOTHONlOS Design
`and fabrication of memory
`devices based on nanoscale
`polyoxometalate clusters
`C Busche et al.
`
`PALAEOBLIMATE Evolution and forcing
`mechanisms of El Nifio over
`
`the past 21,000 years
`ZLiu et al. SEE nsv P.494
`
`554 BIOPHYSICSMultiplexsingle-molecule
`interaction profilingof DNA-barcoded
`
`”News
`L Gu et al.
`555 DANCER MPDL3280A(anti-PD-L1)
`treatment leads to clinical
`
`activity in metastatic bladder cancer
`TPowles et al. SEE nsv P. 496
`
`5E3
`
`CANCER Predictive correlates of
`response to the anti-PD-Ll anti body
`MPDLSZSOA in cancer patients
`R S Herbst et al. SEE Nsv P. 496
`.
`553 DANCE“ PD: tfli‘ftf‘ge "1‘1"“?
`responses y In I
`I mg
`adaptive immune resistance
`P C Tomeh et al. sEE uov R496
`I
`I
`.
`
`.
`
`spectrometry and game sequfficing
`M Vaclav et al. 55: MN [1495
`_
`‘
`5?? CANCER Checkpoml blockade cancer
`immunotherapy targets tumour-
`SPECIlIC ("mam antigens
`M M Gubm el 8'» SEE W P- 496
`552 NEUROSCIENOE Histone H2A.Z subunit
`exchange controls consolidation of
`recent and remote memory
`iBZovKic et al.
`53; PLANT SCIENCES Epigenetic
`reprogrammingthat prevents
`transgenerational inheritance
`ofthe vernalized state
`P Crevmén et al.
`591 VIHOLOOY A structure-based mechanism
`fortRNA and retroviral RNA
`remodelling during primer annealing
`S B Miller, FZ Yiicliz. JA Lo, 3 Wang
`8. VM D’Souza
`
`2? NOVEMBER 2014'
`
`VOL 515 | NATURE | 46]
`
`NE’Al ONLINE
`493 Papers published this week at naturecom
`
`NEVIS & VIEWS
`494 CLIMATE SCIENCE
`El Nifio's variable history
`Evolution of the El Nine—Southern
`Oscillation over the past 21,000 years
`Josephine R Brown SEE LETTER P.sso
`495 MAMMALIAN EVOLUTION
`A beast ofthe scuthern wild
`A complete skull of a Madagascar:
`Eondvaanfthere
`one
`6; SEE ARTICLE P's”
`
`495 “NEE"
`Antitumourimmunity getsa boost
`Resi’onsem 'mmune‘cmkpo'm
`blockade in multiple cancers
`Jedd D Woichok it Timothy/A Chan
`SEE LETTERS PP.558—581
`
`498 ASTRONOMY
`Cosmic triangles and
`Hack-hole masses
`Estimating geometric distances to
`active galactic nuclei and quasars
`Martin Elvis SEE LETTER P528
`499 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
`Polarize t0 elongate
`Toll receptors direct cell rearrangement
`
`”W Tape“ SEE ”mm P523
`50‘ DIET
`Food choices for health and planet
`Projected diets {inked to greenhouse.
`gas emissions and poor health
`Eiire Stehfest 55: ARTICLE ns1e
`502 IMMUNOLOGY
`Tolerance liesinthetiming
`Lck—bound co—receptor recruitment is
`rate—limiting for negative selection
`Nicholas RJ Gascoigne
`REVIEW
`_
`_
`_
`505 ECULBGY Belowgrouncl biodiversny
`and ecosystem functioning
`R D Badge” W” “a” 0"” Putts”
`IIITICLES
`512 EVOLUTION First cranial remains of a
`gondwanatherian mammal reveal
`remarkable mosaicism
`D WKiause et al. sEE Ivav R495
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`,
`:
`|
`
`I
`{Spa-m? his
`
`555549.
`.
`. --t
`
`.5
`
`.593.589.572&5?i.
`
`‘
`
`518 NUTRITION Global diets link
`environmental sustainability
`and human health
`
`523 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY A positional
`Toll receptor code directs convergent
`extension in Drosophila
`A C Par-é et al. SEE N&V R499
`
`53]
`
`LETTERS
`525 Asmononr A dust-parallax distance of
`19 megapsrsecstothe supermassive
`blacknhole m NGC 415:!
`_
`8 F Honig. D Watson, M KIShlmOm
`‘5” Him“ SEE ”8““ P493
`SPACE PHYSIOS-An impenetrable barrier
`to uitrarelatIvIstIc electrons In the
`Van Allen radiation belts
`D N Bakeret al.
`535 MATERIALS SCIENCE Metallization of
`vanadium dioxide driven by
`large phonon entropy
`J D BUda' 9t al.
`540 OPTICS AND PHOTONIOS Passive
`radiative cooling below ambient air
`
`

`

`nature
`
`27 November 2014 t V01515 1' Issue No. 7528
`
`nature@nature.com
`
`LONDON. PARIS, MUNICH,
`SHANGHAI, TOKYO. SAN FRANCISCO.
`WASHINGTON DC. NE’I'II YORK.
`BOSTON
`EoITOR-lN-CHIEE: Philip Campbell
`NATURE EDITORIAL DIRECTOR: Ritu Dhanti
`DIRECTOR. AUTHOR AND REVIEWER SERVICES: veronioue Kierrner
`EliEcurivE EDITori: Nick Campbell
`HEAD OF EDITORIAL PRODUCTION: Lucy Banhani
`CHIEF MAGAZINE EoITorI: Rosie Mestel
`CREATIVE DIRECTOR: Kelly Buckheit Krause
`THIS WEEKINEwSI’FEATURES‘. Alison Abbott. David Adam. Celeste
`Biever, Declan Butler. Ewen Callaway, Davide Castelvecchi.
`Erika Check Hayden, Matthew Crenson. Danrel Cressey.
`David Cyranoski. Elizabeth Gibney. Heidi Ledford, Corie Lok.
`Brendan Mahler. Richard Monastersky. Lauren Morelio.
`Anna Nagle. Helen Pearson. Sara Reardon. Qulrin Schiermeier.
`Jeff Tollefson. Richard \tan Noorden. M Mitchell Waldrop.
`Alexandra Witze COMMENT: Sara Abdulla. Joanne Baker,
`Rosalind Cotter. Barbara Kiser. Lucy Odling-Smee NATURE
`PDDCASTJIIIDEO: Charlotte Stoddart. Noah Baker. Kerri Smith
`NEWS AND VIEWS: Andrew Mitchinson. Jenniter Gardiner.
`Ana Lopes. Marian Turner RESEARCH: Francesca Cesari.
`Karl Zieme1i's. l-han Chou. Tanguy Chouard, Rosamund Dew.
`Alex Eccleston. Angela Eggteston. Joshua Finkelstein. Henry Gee.
`Patrick Goymer. Hanna Granroth-Wilding. Noah Gray.
`Claire Hansetl. Marie-Thérese Heemels. Magdalena Helmer.
`Andrew Jermy. Nathalie Le Bot. Barbara Made. Juliane
`Mosslnger. Leonie Mueck. Leslie Sage. Sadat Shaoan.
`Mara Silva. Magdalena Skipper. Clare Thomas, John \tanDecar.
`Liesbeth Venerna. Ursula weiss. Michael White insrsiirsr'
`REVIEWSIPERSPECTIVES: Ursula Weiss CAREERS: Karen
`Kaplan TECHNOLOGY FEATURES: Vivien Marx FUTURES: Colin
`Sullivan SUPPLEMENTS: Herb Brody. Michelle Grayson.
`Kathryn Miller STATISTICAL ADVISER: Theresa Hyslop
`SUBEDITOFIS: Colin Sullivan. Mary Abraham, Sarah Archibald,
`Nicola Bailey. Adam Born. Nicolas Fanget, isobel Flanagan.
`Paul Fletcher. Nrsha Gaind. Anne Haggait. Dinah Loon.
`Anna Novitzky. ‘r'ukie Ozawa. Katherrne Per ry, David Price,
`Jenny Rooke. David Winters. Anna ‘r‘ork PRODUCTION: Nick
`Kemp. Donald McDonald. Stewart Fraser. Susan Gray. Simon
`Gribbin. Hazel Mayhew. Ian Pope. ‘r’vonne Strong. Roberta
`Tarran, Charles Wenz ART AND DESIGN: Wesley Ferna nde 5,
`Michael Ayres. Jennifer Burns. Ffion Cleverley.
`Barbara lzdebska. Paul Jackman. Jasiek Krzysztotiak.
`Annthea Lewis. Chris Maddaloni. Chris Ryan. Nik Spencer,
`Claire Welsh JAPAN EDITION: Eiji Matsuda. Mika Ishida.
`Mitsuyo Utsugi. Sayaka Ayarne PRESS OFFICE: Alice Henchley.
`Neda Afsarmanesh, Lisa Boucher. Sarah Lahert,
`Michael Stacey. Rebecfia Walton NATURE DIGITAL: Tom Scott,
`Cianna Timbers. Alexander Thurrell. DIptI Shah, Dan Foley.
`Robert Sullivan. Matthew Carey. Luke Stayenhagen.
`Marta Rolak. Glynn Phillips, Marcin Arciuch ADMINISTRATION:
`Caroline McLean. Roseann Campbell. Emily Banham.
`Sophie Beastey. Emma Clilford. Dana Coles, Ella Kahn.
`Melissa Rose. Lauren Sequeira. Kenneth Simpson.
`Kimberly Tolteson. Michelle Viscuso. Andrea Von.
`Rebecca White. Diane Yorke
`
`'ciil'Er'ExzcuTwE'o'rrlcze: Steven lnchcoon'ibe
`PUBLISHER: Sarah Greaves
`PUBLISHER (SUPPLEMENTS 8.: PARTNERSHIPS): Richard Hughes
`PUBLISHING PROJECT MANAGER: Anastasia Panoutsou
`
` DISPLAY ADVERTISING:
`USKCANAUA: dispfay@us.nature.com
`EUROPE: display@nature.coin
`ASIA-F‘AE:-‘FIC: nature@natureasia.com
`SPONSORSHIP: sponsorship@nature.con1
`NATURE JOBS: natureiobs@nature.coni
`
`UWCANADAJLATIN AMERICA: marketing@us.nalure.com
`EU R0 PEAREST DF WON LD: ma rketing@ natu re .COm
`JAPANICHINAJ‘KO REA: marketing@n atureasiacom
`INDIA: IIIarkeiing-india@nature.com
`
`AM ERicAS: i'nstitu'tio n's@ natUrenyiconI
`ASIA-PACIFIC: institutions@natureasia.com
`AUSTRA LIAI'NEIItr ZEALANO: natu re@ma cmillan.com.au
`EU R0 Pia-“Row: institutions@ naturecom
`INDIA: npgindia@ naturecorn
`
`E.- (INCLUDING POSTAND PACKING)
`.
`...
`-
`:
`UKJEUROPEIREST OF WORLD
`subscriptions@riature.com
`FULL RATE: UK £1,942 Europe E3014
`PERSONAL RATES: UK £135: Europe €209: Rest of World £210
`STUDENT RATES: UK iii-’9: Europe €122: Rest of World £125
`Individual rates apply to payments by personal cheque or
`credit card. BACK ISSUES: £20.00.
`USAI'tCIANIIIDIMIf LATIN AM ERICA
`subscriptions@us.nature.i:om
`msnnmoNALr’ooRPORATE RATE: $3390
`PERSONAL RATE: $199 STUDENT RATE: $99: Posrooc RATE: $1 19
`Printed in USA. Individual rates available only to subscribers
`paying by personal check or credit card. Orders for
`studentfpostdoc subscriptions must be accompanied by a
`copy oI student ID. Rates apply to USA. Canada, MexicoICentral
`& Soulh America. Add 7% GST lax in Canada (Canadian GST
`number 14091 1595). BACK Issues: US$20.00.
`JAPANI'CHINAI’KOREA
`JAPAN: natureasiar’japan-subscribe
`CHINA: natureasiar’china-subscribe
`KOREA: two-Anatureasiaco mr’ko-krrsubscri'be
`
`N150 LONDON: nature@n'ature.com
`The Macmillan Building. 4 Crinan Street. London N1 QXW
`Tel: +44 (0)20 T833 £1000
`NPG NEW YORK: nature@natureny.com
`1'5 Varlck St. 9th Floor. New York. NY 10013-191?
`Tel: +1 212 F26 9200
`NPG ASIA—PACIFIC: nature@natureasia.com
`Chiyoda Building. 2—3? Ichigayatamachr. SITinjukLI-ku.
`Tokyo 162-0843
`Tel: +81 3 326? 8?51
`NPG GREATER CHINA: chlna@nature.com
`42F-10r‘1 1. The Center. 989 Changle Lu. Shanghai 200031
`Tel: +86 212422 5000
`
`A list of other NPG offices can be found at
`wwvanature.cornr’npg_fcontactr’of‘lice5.html
`
`Natrrre® {lSSN 0028-0836} published weekly by ..
`UK edition: Nature Publishing Group. a division oi Macmillan
`Publishers Ltd. The Macmillan Building. 4 Crinan Street,
`London N1 QXW. UK.
`US edition: Nature America. Inc. trading as Nature Publishing
`Group. 3’5 Varick St. 9th Fl. New‘r‘ork NY10013-191?. USA.
`Japan edition: NPG Asia-Pacific. Chiyoda Building.
`2.3}- Ichigayatamachi. Shinjuku‘ku. Tokyo 162-0843. Japan.
`Registered as a newspaper at the British Post Office.
`No part of this publication may be reproduced. stored
`in a retrieval system. or transmitted in any form
`(electronic or otherwise) without prior permission from
`permissions@natureturn. In the U5. Nature (ISSN
`0028-0836) is published weekly excepl the last week in
`December by Nature America. Inc. trading as Nature
`Publishing Group. 75 Varick St. 9th Fl. New York N‘rr
`10013-1917. USA. US Periodicals postage paid at New York
`NY, and additional mailing post offices.
`US POSTMASTER: send address changes to Nature America.
`Inc. Subscription Dept. F5 Varick St. 9th Fl. New York NY
`10013-1911“. USA.
`© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`464 | NATURE i
`
`\'{.I[. SIS 3 2? NOVEMBER
`
`‘Joirr
`
`naturej urnais
`
`SHARE
`
`.
`
`l Available on (In:
`
`‘ App Store
`
`..
`..
`II.IlU|L' puliiistain: group @I
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`doi:l0.10§$f_r_l_ature_1390
`
`MPDL3280A (anti—PD—Ll) treatment leads to clinical
`activity in metastatic bladder cancer
`
`Thomas P0w1es', Joseph Paul Ederz, Gregg D. Finea. Fadi S. Braiteh“, Yohann LoriotS, Cristina Cruz", Joaqnim Bellmunt7,
`Howard A. Burrisg, Daniel P. Petrylalt‘i, Siew—leng Tang), Xiaodong Shena. Zachary Boyd". Priti S. Hegdes, Daniel S. Chen3
`8: Nicholas J. \logelzang‘J
`
`pre—screen samples, 59% were from resections and 27% were from bio~
`psies. Analysis was permitted on both archived and fresh tissue. The
`time between tissue collection and starting MPDL3280A treatment is
`shown in Extended Data Fig.
`l. The prevalence of positive PD-Ll
`expression (IHC score 2 0r 3 (213)) in tumour-infiltrating immune
`cells in the pre—screened population was 27% (Fig. 1a. b). Only 4% of
`pre—screened patients had positive PD-Ll expression in tumour-infilt-
`rating immune cells and in tumour cells.
`Patients in the UBC cohort were dosed between 13 March 2013 and
`
`There have been no major advances for the treatment of metastatic
`urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) in the last 30 years. Chemotherapy
`is still the standard of care. Patient outcomes, especially for those in
`whom chemotherapy is not effective or is poorly tolerated, remain
`poor“. One hallmark of UBC is the presence of high rates of so matic
`mutations”. These alterations may enhance the ability of the host
`immune system to recognize tumour cells as foreign owing to an
`increased number ofantigens“. However, these cancers may also elude
`immune surveillance and eradication through the expression of pro—
`1 la nualy 2014. As ofthe clinical cutoffdate of 1 lanuary 2014, 68 patients
`grammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1; also called CD274 or B7—H l} in the
`tumour microenvironment”. Therefore, we examined the anti—PD—
`with UBC received treatment and were evaluable for safety. Sixty—seven
`patients were evaluable for eflicacy (one patient had less than 6 weeks
`Ll antibody MPDL3280A, a systemic cancer immunotherapy, for
`follow up and therefore no efficacy evaluation). Of the efficacy—evaluable
`the treatment of metastatic UBC. MPDL3280A is a high—affinity engi—
`patients, 12 (18%) had tumours scored as PD—Ll IHCO. 23 (34%) as IHC
`neered human anti-PD-Ll monoclonal immunoglobulin—Gl antibody
`1, 2t] (30%) as IHC 2, 10 (15%) asIHC 3, and 2 (3%) as unknown based
`that inhibits the interaction of PD~Ll with PD—l (PDCD 1) and 37.1
`on tumour—infiltrating immune cells (see Methods for precise defini-
`(CD80)9. Because PD-Ll is expressed on activated T cells, MPDL3 280A
`tions). One patient had a PD—Ll IHC score of 2 or 3 for both tumour-
`was engineered with a modification in the Fc domain that eliminates
`inftltrating immune cells and tumour cells. Twenty-one patients with
`antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity at clinically relevant doses
`PD—Ll IHC 2 or 3 scores were enrolled before the cohort was expanded
`to prevent the depletion of T cells expressing PD-Ll. Here we show
`that MPDLSZSOA has noteworthy activity in metastatic UBC. Res-
`to include patients regardless of IHC status. Patients were pretreated
`ponses were often rapid, with many occurring at the time of the first
`with 62 (93%) receiving previous cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemo—
`therapy (53 (79%) received previous cisplatin) and 48 (72%) receiving 2
`response assessment (6 weeks) and nearly all were ongoing at the data
`or more previous systemic treatments. Furthermore, many patients had
`cutoff. This phase I expansion study, with an adaptive design that
`poor prognostic factors at baseline 1 “2. including 50 (75%) with visceral
`allowed for biomarker-positive enriched cohorts, demonstrated that
`metastases, 12 (19%) with haemoglobin levels less than 10 gdl'" ', 22
`tumours expressing PD-Ll-positive tumour-infiltrating immune cells
`(33%) with creatinine clearance less than 60 ml min—', 39 (59%) with
`had particularly high response rates. Moreover, owing to the favour-
`an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score
`able toxicity profile. including a lack of renal toxicity, patients with
`of 1, and 26 (42%) whose time from previous chemotherapy was 3 months
`UBC, who are often older and have a higher incidence of renal impair—
`or less (Table 1).
`ment, may be better able to tolerate MPDL3280A versus chemother—
`In the safety-evaluable population, patients with UBC received
`apy. These results suggest that MPDL3280A may have an important
`MPDL3280A for a median duration of 65 days (range: 1—259 clays).
`role in treating UBC—the drug received breakthrough designation
`0fthese patients, 57% reported a treatment—related adverse event (AE)
`status by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in lune 2014.
`of any grade, and 4% reported a grade 3 treatment—related AE, which
`We report on the safety and activity of MPDL3280A in patients with
`UBC who were enrolled in a UBC expansion cohort of a large phase I
`included one occurrence each of asthenia, thrombocytopaenia and de-
`creased blood phosphorus (Table 2 and Extended Data Table 1). There
`trial with an adaptive design. This progressive design has been used prev-
`were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs. Most treatment- related ABS
`iously to investigate immune checkpoint inhibitors in a spectrum of
`were grade 1 or 2, and many were transient in nature. Overall, decreased
`tumours and has resulted in regulatory approval in other settings” (see
`also http:llwwwspecialtypharmajournal.coml‘medical—newsloncologyl’
`appetite (grade ll2, 22%; grade 3M. 0%) and fatigue (grade ll2, 18%;
`grade 31%, 0%) were the most commonly reported toxicities and are
`51 l9—japanese« regulators—approve-the—first—pd— 1 —drug— f0 r—treatinent—
`thought to be related to immune system activationlJ (Extended Data
`of—melanorna). This UBC cohort was initially selected by PD—Ll immuno—
`Table 2). No investigator—assessed irru'ntme—related toxicities were reported.
`histochemistry (IHC) on tumour—infiltrating immune cells to test the
`hypothesis that PD—Ll—positive patients might specifically respond to
`For patients with a minimum of 6 weeks of follow-up, objective res—
`ponse rates (ORRs) were 43% (13 of 30; 95% confidence interval (CI):
`MPDL3280A. The cohort was subsequently expanded to include patients
`26—63%) for those with lHC 213 tumours and 11% (4 of 35; 95% CI:
`regardless ofFD-Ll status to determine whether PD- 1.1 negative patients
`4—26%) for those with IHC 0 0r 1 (011) tumours. The IHC 23 ORR
`could also respond. Overall, 205 patients were pre~screened and speci—
`
`mens were centrally analysed for PD—Ll expression. Of the available included a 7% complete response rate (2 of 30) (Figs 1c and 2). Among
`1Baits Cancer institute. Queen Mary University of Lo ndon. Ba rts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. London EC1M SEQ. UK. afale Cancer Center. 333 Cedar Street, WWW2] I. New Haven. Connecticut
`06520. USA 3Genenterh. inc. 1 DNA Way. South San Francisco, California 94080, USA. “Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada. 3730 8. Eastern Avenue, Las Vegas. Nevada 89169. USPL 5Gustave
`Roussy. 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant. 94305 Villeiuif. France. Wall d‘Hebron Institute or Oncology (VHIO) and Will d'Hebron Universily Hospital. Passeig Vall d‘Hebron. 1 19-129. 08035. Barcelona. Spain.
`Ftilladoer Cancer Ce nter, Dana-FarberrBrigharn and Women's CancerCenter, Harvard Medical School. 450 Brookline Avenue. Boston. Massachusells 02215,USA.3Sarah Cannon Research Institute. 33 22
`West End Avenue. Suite 900. Nashville. Tennessee 32203. USA. 9University of Nevada School or Medicine and US Oncolognyorn preh ensive Cancer Centers of Nevada. 3?30 3. Eastern Avenue. Las Vegas.
`Nevada 89169. USA.
`
`558 | NATURE | VOL 5l5 I
`
`'2? NOVEMBER 201-1
`
`

`

`Hm
`
`
`Figure l i PD—Ll prevalence and response rates
`
`PD—Li prevalence in UBC tumours by IHC
`in patients with UBC. a. PD—Ll prevalence by
`immunohistochemistry (IHC) in patients screened
`PD-L1-positive
`for the PCD4939g clinical trial. PD—Ll positivity
`tumour-infiltrating immune cells
`PD-L1 -positive tumour cells
`was defined as 25% oftumour~infiltrating
`(no. of specimens (‘16))
`n = 205
`("0' Of spectmens (‘36))
`immune cells or tumour cells staining for PD-Ll
`IHC 3
`14 i?)
`by IHC. b, Representative images (X 20
`IHC 2
`3 (4)
`magnification) of I’D-Ll IHC staining of tumours
`IHC ‘l
`3? (18)
`from patients with UBC. 1:. Response rates,
`HO 0
`14s (71}
`including overall response, stable disease and
`progressive disease by tumour-infiltrating immune
`cell PD—Ll IHC status. Includes both confirmed
`and unconfirmed responses per RECIST v1.1.
`Five of seventeen responses were unconfirmed.
`Best response is not known for seven patients.
`
`18 (9)
`3? (18}
`89 (43)
`51 (30]
`
`
`
`Tumour-infiltrating immune cells
`Tumour cells
`
`
`c
`
`Tumour-infiltrating immune cells and objective response rates
`
`Objective response rate
`Stable disease
`Progressive disease
`
`:1 (as)
`n on
`n (961
`13 4 .3
`(95% Ci:(2:.5)-62.6)
`(95% 35222413,
`a 40.0
`(95% ell 204433)
`(9596:91'326 3)
`3 13.0
`(95% cl: 3.71—31 .r)
`
`IHC are (n = so)
`IHC 3 (n = 10}
`IHC 2 (n = 20)
`IHC 0n (n = 35)
`IHC 1 (n = 23)
`
`a {26.7}
`2 (20.0)
`6 (30.0)
`13 (3?.1)
`a (34.8)
`
`a (26.?)
`3 (30.0)
`5 (25.0}
`13 (37.1}
`s (34.8}
`
`IHC 0 (n =12}
`
`1 (3‘3)
`(95% Cl: 04—343)
`
`5 (41.7)
`
`5 {41.7}
`
`patients with IHC 2! 3 tumours and a minimum of 12 weeks of follow-
`up, an ORR of 52% (13 of 25; 95% CI: 32—70%) was achieved. Sixteen of
`the seventeen responders had ongoing responses, and all seventeen res-
`ponders continued on treatment with MPDLSZSOA at the data cutoff
`One patient who initially responded at the first response assessment
`later presented with new lesions, including a bladder mass thought to
`be consistent with pseudoprogtession. A biopsy of the new mass revealed
`extensive necrosis. This patient continued on treatment and had com—
`pleted 12 cycles at the time of the data cutoff.
`While the median has not been reached, duration of response ranged
`from 0.1+ to 30.3 + weeks for patients with IHC 21(3 tumours and from
`0.1+ to 6.0+ weeks for patients with IHC 01'1 tumours. Furthermore, while
`response to MPDL3280A was associated with the tumour-infiltrating
`immune cell IHC scores (P = 0.026), there did not appear to be an asso-
`ciation with tumour cell IHC scores (P = 0.93; Extended Data Table 3).
`Exploratory subgroup analyses demonstrated that IHC 2:3 and IHC
`Oil patients with an ECOG performance Score of 1 had ORRs of 33% (5
`of 15) and 14% (3 of 22), respectively, while patients whose time from
`previous chemotherapy was 53 months had ORRs of 33% (3 of 9) and
`19% (3 of 16), respectively. The ORRs for patients with visceral meta—
`stases at baseline was 21% (4 of 19) and 10% (3 of 29) for IHC 213 and
`lHC 0!] patients, respectively, while the ORRs for patients with no
`visceral metastases at baseline were 82% (9 of 11) and 17% (I of 6) for
`
`MC 213 and IHC Oil patients, respectively. The ORRs in current!
`former smokers and never smokers were 25% (11 of 44) and 26% (6
`of 23), respectively. In total, most patients (55%) had a reduction in
`tumour burden as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid
`Tumours, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (Fig. 21)). Overall, responses were
`rapid and occurred at a median of 42 days from starting treatment
`(Fig. 2c). Patients with IHC 21'?) tumours and IHC 011 tumours had
`a median follow up of 4.2 months (range: 1.1+ to 8.5 months) and
`2.7 months (range: 0.7+ to 3.6 months), respectively. Twenty—five patients
`(37%) had been discontinued from the study due to disease progression
`(n = 17), death (:1 = 4), lost to follow- up [n = 1), physician decision
`(it = 2), or patient decision (in = 1).
`Over the course of treatment with MPDL3280A, cytoldnes and cir—
`culating cells were monitored. Transient elevations in cytoki nes, includ—
`ing interleukin (ID-18 and interferon (IFN)-'y, were observed by cycle
`2 day 1. A similar dynamic profile was observed for proliferating CD8 +
`HLA-DR+Ki-67+ T cells (Extended Data Fig. 3), consistent with the
`MPDL3280A mechanism of action. These markers were altered in all
`
`patients treated and were not associated with response.
`There is an urgent need for efficacious and well-tolerated therapies
`in metastatic UBC, as even first-line chemotherapy is poorly tolerated
`in a large proportion of individualsws. The study results presented
`here demonstrate that not only can MPDL3280A treatment achieve
`2? NOVEMBER 2014|VOL SIS NATUREISS‘?
`
`

`

`L_ETTEH
`
`Table 1 | Baseline characteristics of efficacy-evaluable patients with UBC
`Characteristic
`PD-L] IHC 2f3
`PD-Ll IHC Or’l
`Eflicacyvevaluable patients
`(n = 30)
`(n = 35)
`(n = 6?)
`
`
`
`
`Age (years)
`Median
`Range
`Sex ("1 (970))
`Male
`ECOG PS (:1 (95))
`0
`1
`Smoking status (1) (95))
`Current!previous smoker
`Site of primary tumour (n (%))
`Bladder
`Renal pelvis
`Ureter
`Urethra
`Sites of metastases at baseline (n (95))
`Visceral
`Liver
`Prior treatments‘(n (9:3))
`Cystectomyr
`Chemotherapy
`Prior platinum
`CiSplatin
`Carboplatin
`22 Prior systemic regimens
`Prior 300
`53 months from last prior chemotherapy (n (93))
`Organ function (it (95))
`Alkaline phosphatase EULN
`CrCi <60 ml mi n '1
`Haemoglobin <: 10gdl'1
`PD-Ll IHC (n (%))
`12 (119)
`12 (34.3)
`0(0)
`0
`23 (34.3)
`23 (65.?)
`0 (O)
`l
`20 (29.9)
`0 (0)
`20 (66.?)
`2
`10 (14.9)
`0(0)
`10 (33.3)
`3
`
`0(0) 2 (3.0) 0(0)
`
`Unknown
`BCG. Elaciiie Calmet‘te-Guerin: CrCl, creatinine clearance; ULN. upper limit at normal. Two patients have unknown IHC status.
`'n=29.tn=35.:n=66.§n=31:||n-- 62:'n-' 30: fin—34: "'n= 65.
`
`66.5
`42~86
`
`25 (83.3)
`
`14 (48.3)*
`15 (51.?)*
`
`20 (66.7)
`
`2? (90.0)
`l (3.3)
`0
`2 (6.7)
`
`19 (63.3)
`9 (30.0)
`
`20 (66.?)
`29 (96.?)
`29 (96.?)
`28 (93.3)
`T (23.3)
`21 (20.0)
`6 (20.0)
`9 (310)"
`
`4 (13.3)
`7 (23.3)‘i
`2 (6.9)*
`
`63.0
`36—81
`
`21 (60.0)
`
`13 (3?. l )1‘
`22 (62.9)i
`
`22 (62.9)
`
`28 (80.0)
`3 (8.6)
`3 (8.6)
`l (2.9)
`
`29 (82.9)
`12 (34.3)
`
`11 (31.4)
`31 (88.6)
`31 (88.6)
`23 (65.?)
`15 (42.9)
`25 (71,4)
`5 (14.3)
`16 (51.6)§
`
`10 (28.6)
`13 (38.2)“
`9 (26.5)“
`
`65.0
`36-86
`
`48 (21.6)
`
`2 T (40.9):
`39 (59.1):
`
`44 (65.?)
`
`55 (82.1)
`4 (6.0)
`5 (I5)
`3 (4.5)
`
`50 (?4.6)
`22 (32.8)
`
`'
`
`32 (4?.8)
`62 (92.5)
`62 (92.5)
`53 (79.1)
`23 (34.3)
`48 ('r' 1.6)
`11 (16.4)
`26 (41.9)“
`
`16 (23.9)
`22 (33.3):
`12 (18.5)“
`
`high response rates, but also that the likelihood of response can be in—
`creased by determining the PD- Ll status of tumour-infiltrating immune
`cells. Previous biomarker analysis with immune check point inhibitors
`has focused on PD-Ll expression on tumour cells rather than tumour-
`infiltrating immune cells. The observation that expression of immune
`infiltrates on pie—treatment tissue—which can be far removed temporally,
`anatomically and biologically from the metastatic tumours—correlated
`
`Table 2 | Treatment-related adverse eventsoccurring in two or more
`
`patients (grade 1-2) or in one patient (grade 3—4)
`Treatment-related
`All grades (:1 (56))
`adverse events' (:1 = 68)
`
`Grade 3—4 (:1 (96))
`
`3 (4.4)
`39 (5 14)
`All
`0
`8 (l 1.8)
`Decreased appetite
`D
`8(11.8)
`Fatigue
`0
`801.8)
`Nausea
`0
`6 (8.8)
`Pyrexia
`1 (1.5)
`5 (l4)
`Asthenia
`0
`3 (4.4)
`Chills
`0
`3 (4.4)
`Influenza-like illness
`O
`3 (4.4)
`Lethargy
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Anaemia
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Arthralgia
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Bone pain
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Hyperthermia
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Pain
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Platelet count decrease
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Pruritus
`1 (1.5)
`2 (2.9)
`Thrombocytopaenia
`0
`2 (2.9)
`Vomiting
`1(1.5)
`1 (1.5)
`Blood phosphorus
`decrease
`‘ National Cancer Instilute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. version 4.0.
`
`560 | NATURE | Vol. 515 ! 2? NOVEMBER 2014
`
`with outcomes provides some insight into the underlying stability of
`immune—related tumour surveillance in UBC. For example, the tissues
`examined here were originally obtained between 0 and 10 years before
`cycle 1, day l , with most tissues being obtained within 4 years (Extended
`Data Fig. 1). The association of response to MPDL3280A with PD-Ll
`expression on tumour~infiltrating immune cells was also recently ob—
`served in lung cancer”.
`While cross—study comparisons are limited, the 43% (95% CI: 26—63%)
`response rate achieved here in patients with PD-Li IHC 21'3 tumours
`provides evidence of noteworthy clinical activity of MPDL3280A in
`patients with UBC and compares favourably with that previously seen
`with single-agent salvage regimens'6'2". In addition, patients with PD-
`Li IHC Oil tumours had a response rate of 11% (95% CI: 41—26%). con-
`sistent with historic response rates of 9—1 1% in randomized studies for
`patients with relapsed metastatic UBC”. Responses in this heavily pre—
`treated population were also rapid and occurred in patients with poor
`prognostic features.
`Chemotherapy is challenging to administer in patients with UBC who
`have a median age at diagnosis of 73 years and multiple co—morbidities23
`(see also http:(iseer.cancer.govistatfactsihmiliurmbhtml). Many patients
`forgo chemotherapy for metastatic disease due to the toxicity and the
`limited durable benefit, and only approximately 40% ofpatients receive
`second—line treatment”. Therefore. the safety results with MPDLSZSOA
`are also encouraging. The larger and longer safety experience in the
`overall phase I study further indicates that M?DL3280A is well toler—
`ated, with AF. rates lower than many of the standard second—line treat-
`ment options for metastatic UBC".
`'
`To gain a better understanding of how the immune system responds
`to MPDL3280A. the levels of the IL- 18 immunostimulatory cytokine
`and IFN—y, which is stimulated by IL-18, were examined over several
`
`

`

`a
`
`Baseline
`
`Post-cycle 2
`
`Post-cycle 8
`
`
`
`
`MaximumSLDreductionfrombaseline(96)
`
`b
`
`IOUgo
`30
`in
`so
`so
`
`1100
`
`I Inc (ICJD
`I IHC {“311
`I IHC {1012
`I ”'10 {ICl3
`I IHCllcluniu'Iown
`
`
`
`
`
`t ttl'Dtiflilt “olefin-[ti
`i r1 -
`'
`-
`£006 PS Till I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ ‘I‘: , 4%.}
`visceral metastases . _ . .
`Uvermelaslases in; '- .
`_ .11.
`
`”Ill.
`H9 <IogaI-‘
`100
`90
`g!
`$3
`2
`50
`E
`LU g 50
`2 - no
`a .2 w
`0']
`as i3
`: E
`o
`O
`-‘10
`E E —20
`01 .—.
`:1 .5 -30
`0
`D)“ —60
`i s -50
`5
`~70
`6
`:33
`not)
`
`I:
`
`
`
`
`— Complete response
`
`—-— Partial response
`Stable disease
`Progressive disease
`
`
`
` A New lesions r r 1 I 1 r I r I I r r
`
`
`
`
`Q Discontinued
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a4 ‘IEIS 126 14? 163 139 210 231 252 2?3 294
`66
`02142
`Time on study {clays}
`
`Figure 2 I MPDL3280A anti-tumour activity in patients with UBC.
`a, Example ofa tumour response in a 68—year—old male who was initially treated
`for bladder cancer between 2011 and 2012. He underwent transurethral
`resection of the bladder tumour and intravesical Bacille Calmette—Guerin for
`localized recurrent disease (GSpTic). Subsequently, cystectomy and adjuvant
`cispl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket