throbber
A summary-[M x
`(— — Q a
`b in:mun-imamcorms-cowllmgsbuml
`
`ASCO Meeting Library
`
`III
`
`12
`
`fl L I9
`
`Siam CL (3
`
`Phase lrll Safety and Antiturncir Activity of Nivoiumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
`[HCC]: WEB-040
`i Presented Saturday. May 30. 2015
`
`'
`
`“mum ma”:
`
`who:
`
`2i“! “COW
`
`“denim clnlul Sciatce
`Symposium
`
`Smleni'fln:
`
`Ilium-Wm”! In!
`0!!me
`Used Your
`M“
`.
`
`Mel-
`
`sub-mt:
`
`mammal
`12:12:23,
`.mm."
`"figment
`“m”
`H
`l
`10‘
`m a
`mum mums!”
`WW,
`Men:
`
`;-€-n fined as. 2015
`£9;de JD'i' 'yflélDl'J
`
`”Miami...” an...“
`
`mg mg”,
`
`“"3"“? “it""mm‘ WW““"*"“
`UL‘Mu‘
`Lulu blaming tliJill-llI'l
`
`mam-mm I
`m“
`
`m
`
`
`
`
`
` 6 VideoG Abstract @ Slides
`
`Authors:
`
`Anthony EL EIIKhoueiry. ignacio Melero. Todd 5. Crocenzi, Theodore Hobart Welling Thomas Cheung vau. Winnie
`Yen, Akhll Chopra. Joseph Grossc, leln Lang. Jeffrey Anderson, Christine Mane Dela Cruz, Bruno Sangro: University
`of Southern Calliomia Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles. Cit Clinica Universidad de Navarra and
`CIBERend, Pamplona. Spain: Frmidence Cancer Center. Pordand....
`View More-l
`
`flhslracl Discldslles
`
`Background:
`Overelioresslon of PD-Ll In HCC has a poor prognosis. Safety and dreilrnlnary antlturnor efficacy of niwlu man. a
`fully human :36: monoclonal antibody PD-t Inhibitor. was evaluated In a multiple ascending-dose. phase lrll stud}r
`in patients (ms) with HCC.
`
`Medmls:
`Fits wltn Histologitaily confirmed advanced HCC with Child-Pugh (E P] score 5 B? and progressive disease [90; on.
`
`intolerant of. 0r refusing sorai‘enio were enrolled. Dose escalation occurred in parallel cohorts based on etiology.
`no act-fire hepatitisvfrus in-‘eCtion or viruSAim’eCLN HCC nits. Pts received nivoiurnao DJ - 10 marks. intravenously
`for up to two years. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints Included antltumor activity using
`rni-‘iECIST criteria, pharmacokinetlcs. and immundgenltity.
`Shesuitst
`-
`The Study has enrolled 41 pts with a CD score of 5 (n I 35) or 6 (n = 6). e036 score of!) {n * 26) or i tn “51.18%
`with extrahepatjc metastasis andror portal vein invasion, and Hill with prior sorafenib use. Eighteen DE. remain
`on study. and 23 discontinued treatment due to PD in 117}, complete response (CR: n i 2]. drug-related adverse
`events iAEs' n = 2) and nondrug-reiated AEs (n . 2:. Drug-related AEs ofany grade occurred In 29 ptst?1%: 17%
`grade 3rd). with z 10% of pits experiencing aspartate amlnptransrerase {ASTJ increase and rash (each 1W1}, alanine
`_
`emlnotransferaseifilm and lipase increase {each 1596}. and arm-lase Increase [1296]. Grade 3 and 4 AB 2 5% were
`A'ST increase [12%].ALT increase (10%] and lipase increase (5%}. A dose-limiting toxicity occurred In an uninfected
`at at 10 W no maximum tolerated dose was defined in any cohort Response was evaluabie in 39 p612 Cl!
`i596] and "I partial responses [PR: 1896!. Response duration was 14- I‘i'+ months for CR 4 l-B+ months for PR. and
`1.5—1?“ months for Stable disease (SD). Overall survival {05} rate a! 6 months Is 7296.
`
`conclusions:
`Niuoiumal: has a manageable AE profile and produced durable responses across all close levels and HCC cohorts
`With a favorable almond-i 05 rate. Updated safety. ar-tIturricir activity. and diurnal-Ker data wilt be presented.
`Clinical trial Information: NCI'DIESSBTB
`
`Bestoveratl response.
`
`at in]
`Fit in)
`SD in]
`PD [n]
`
`2
`i
`12
`S
`
`o
`e-
`e
`t
`
`2
`“r
`18
`12
`
`'
`
`E]
`E
`6')
`
`
`
`
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2044
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket