throbber

`
`
`
` ‘L
`
`
`I A Meefing Ijbraryllpilimt X |+ v
`6909:
`Q.
`httpszeetinglibraryascoorgfrecordeSSAQ/abstract
`
`
`
`ASCO' Mee’r'ng Library
`
`
`Sign In Q CD
`
`Ipilimumab for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).
`
`Add to Collection 0
`
`Abstract
`
`
`Authors:
`
`Lauren R. Schaff, Andrew B. Lassman, Samuel A Goldlust, Timothy Francis Cloughesy,
`Samuel Singer, Gary K Schwartz, Fabio Massaitl Iwamoto; Columbia University Medical
`Center, New York, NY:John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, N]; University of
`California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
`
`Abstract Disclosures
`
`Background:
`Currently available treatments for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) are inadequate, and
`median survival is approximately 6 months. Ipilimumab (ipi) is an immune modulator
`that inhibits (FLA-4 and is active in refractory melanoma. including brain metastases.
`
`Methods:
`
`We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients treated with ipi for recurrent
`GBM. and explored safety. response, and survival using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
`
`Results:
`
`There were 10 patients (6 men), median age 55 years (range, 41 -6S). All received prior
`radiotherapy and temozolomide. and 9 received prior bevaclzumab. lpi (3mg/kg/dose)
`was administered for 1St (l ). 2nd {4), 3"d {4), or 6mm recurrence. Bevacizumab was
`administered concurrently to all patients to reduce corticosteroid requirements that can
`blunt ipi effect. Eight patents received concurrent GM-CSF. Dther concurrent
`chemotherapy included nitrosoureas (5). carboplatin (1}, temozolomide (1). or lapatinib
`(1). Corticosteroids (dexamethasone, 0.75 7 4.0 mg/day) were administered concurrently
`in 4. All patients were evaluated for toxicity. One experienced fever, elevated LDH, and
`transaminitis. There were no other significant toxicities, specifically no rash,
`endocrinopathies, or electrolyte abnormalities. Four patients recently started treatment
`and were not evaluable for efficacy analyses. Among the other 6 patients, best response
`was stable disease in 4, and progressive disease in 2; median progression free survival
`(PFS) was 2.2 months and overall survival (OS) was 5.1 months.
`
`Conclusions:
`
`Meeting:
`
`Session
`Title:
`
`Track:
`
`Subtrack:
`
`2014mm
`Annual
`Meen'ng
`
`Publication
`Only: Central
`Nervous
`System
`Tumors
`
`Central
`Nervous
`System
`Tumors
`
`Central
`Nervous
`System
`Tumors
`
`Abstract #:
`
`e13026
`
`Citation:
`
`lCIin Oncol 31
`20l4 [supp|:
`abstr E13026)
`
`Glioblastoma
`
`Drug therapy
`
`Radiation therapy
`
`Granulocyte macrophage colony
`stimulating factor
`
`2014 Annual Meeting
`Proceedings Notices
`
`@lleE
`
`Ipilimumab can be administered safelyto patients with GBM with concurrent GM-CSF,
`bevacizumab. nitrosoureas, and other therapies. Concurrent bevacizumab may reduce
`corticosteroid requirements. Treatment earlier in the disease course merits
`investigation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket