`ISSN; 0012—66617 (Print); 1179-1950 (Online)
`
`
`
`Drugs
`
`
` Adis Drug Eva .
`
`
`-_ns
`
`'.
`‘
`Riociguat
`.-
`:.'{-.
`"
`Extended-Release T-..
`
`EmtricitabincJRilpi'I-irin'fi"
`r -
`‘r DF
`
`Current Opinion
`._
`
`Phosphodiesterasc Inhibitors ‘.'_' CPI}
`
`
`
`
`
`Leading Article
`Checkpoint Inhibitors as Nova;- '-< ncer Therapies
`
`_ Review Articles
`Oral Anticoagulams
`. nsion Guidelines
`
`",
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`
`f}
`
`P
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago
`PG R201 9-00002
`
`
`
`
`MEDICINE
`/
`
`
`
`
`Drugs
`
`Aims and Scope
`
`Drags promotes optimttm
`pharmacotherapy by providing a
`programme of review articles covering
`the most important aspects of clinical
`pharmacology and therapeutics.
`
`The Journal ittclttdes:
`
`- Leadingr'currcnt opiniott articles
`providing an overview of etnergittg or
`contentious issues
`
`- DelinitiVe reviews til' drugs and drug
`classes and their place in patient
`tntlttagetttenl
`
`- Therapy in Practice articles irtclttding
`recommendations for specific clinical
`sttuattons
`
`- High-quality original clinical research
`- Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the
`properties and place in therapy of both
`newer and established drugs
`‘- Adis R&D Insight Reports summarising
`development at first global approval
`
`All manuscripts are subject to peer
`review by international experts. Letters
`to the editor are welcomed and will be
`
`considered For publication.
`
`Copyright Information
`For Author's
`
`As soon as an article is accepted for
`publication. authors will be requested
`to assign copyright of the article (or
`to grant exclusive. publication and
`dissemination rights) to the publisher
`(respective the owner if other than
`Springer). This will ensure the widest
`possible. protection and dissemination of
`ittlorttttttititt under copyright laws.
`More information :tboul copyright
`regulations l'or tliisjournal is available at
`www.springercontMUZGS
`For Rt’rtt’lt'tzt'
`While the advice and information in this
`
`journal is believed to be true and accurate
`at the date ol‘ its publication. neither the
`authors. the editors. nor the pttblisher can
`accept arty legal responsibility for any
`errors or omissions that may have been
`made. The publisher makes no warranty.
`express or implied. with respect to the
`material contained ltercin.
`
`./_\ Adis
`
`All articles published in this journal
`are protected by copyright. which covers
`the exclusive rights to reproduce attd
`distribute the article te.g., as offprints}.
`as well as all translation rights. No
`material published in this journal may
`be reproduced photographically or
`stored on tnicroliltn. itt electronic data
`bases. on video disks. etc.. without
`
`first obtaining written permission from
`the publisher {respective tlte. copyright
`owner il‘other than Springer). The use
`ol' general descriptive names. trade
`names. trademarks. etc.. in this
`
`publication. even il‘ not specifically
`identified. does not imply that these
`names are. not protected by the relevant
`laws and regulations.
`Springer has partnered with Copyright
`Clearance (‘emer's Rightsl.ink service
`to offer a variety of options for reusing
`Springer content. For permission to
`reuse our contettt please locate the
`material that you wish to use on linls.
`springer.com or on springerirnages.eom
`and click on the permissions link or
`go to copyrightcorn and ettter the
`title ol‘ the publication that yott wish
`to use. For assistance in placing
`a permission request. Copyright
`(‘lcarance (”enter can be contacted
`
`directly via phone: +1—855—239v34lfi,
`lax: + l -‘)7li—(t4(1—li(i(lll or e—mail:
`
`inl‘o((_t_}copyright.cottt.
`
`© Springer lntcrnatiomtl Publishing
`Switzerland 2tl|4
`
`Journal Website
`
`www.springercontrzitiZoS
`Electronic edition: |ink.springcr.comt
`jou rna liléll 1265
`
`‘t' We rlrrtr’rt't'os (North. South. ("carrot
`rltiterir‘o and the Caribbean)
`Springer Journal Fulfillment
`233 Spring Street. New York
`NY ”HHS-H73. USA
`Tel: SUD-SPRINGER 077-4643):
`2 l 2—460— I500 (outside North America}
`journals—ny@springer.cont:
`scrviciostlyfizlspringercom
`{Central attd South America}
`
`Outside the Arttt't'it'rrs
`
`Springer Customer Service Center (imbll
`Haberstr. 7'. ()9 | 2(1 Heidelberg. Germany
`Tel.: +49-(i221-345-4303
`
`sttbscriptions@springer.com
`
`Advertisements
`
`[-i—mail contact: advertising(a_3sprittgercom
`or anaeigenfiflspringercom
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Springer publishes advertisements
`in this journal in reliance upon the
`responsibility ol'the advertiser to comply
`with all legal requirements relating to the
`marketing and sale ol‘ products or services
`advertised. Springer and the editors are
`not responsible for claims made iii the
`advertisements published iii the journal.
`The appearance ol'advertisements in
`Springer publications does not constitute
`endorsement, implied or intended. ol' the
`product advertised or the claims made for
`it by the. advertiser.
`
`Office of Publication
`
`Springer International Publishing AU.
`Gewerbestralle l l.(533ll f‘ham. Switzerland
`
`Springer lttternational Publishing is part of
`Springer Science+Business Media
`
`Subscription Information
`
`Drags is published IS times a year.
`Volume 74 t 18 issues} will be published
`in 2014.
`
`Editorial Staff
`Editorial Director: Diana Faulds
`Editorial Assistant: Carole Pearson
`
`ISSN: lltil 2-6667 print
`ISSN:
`l l79-l95tl electronic
`
`For information on subscription rates
`please contact Springer Customer
`Service Center:
`
`
`
`Drugs
`
`Vmume74- Nundwrl7-
`
`2014
`
`CURRENT OPINION
`
`l 983
`
`i993
`
`2015
`
`2033
`
`Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors l'or (‘hronie Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:
`What Does the Future Hold?
`
`MI}. Malera - I’. Rogliani . L. (‘alxella - M. Canola
`
`LEADING ARTICLE
`
`Clinical lmpael oi'Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel (.‘aneer 'I'herapies
`K. Shih - H.-T. Arkenau - .l.R, Inl‘anle
`
`REVIEW ARTICLES
`
`New Ural Antieoagulants for the ‘l'reatment ol' Venous 'l‘hromboembolism:
`Understanding Differences and Similarities
`HP. Dohesh - .l. I‘anikos
`
`Updated National and International I-Iyperlension Guidelines: A Review
`of Current Reeormnendations
`
`S. Kjeldsen - RD. Feltiman . L. Lisheng - .i.-J. Mlllll'llli v(‘.—L-'. ('Iiiang . W. Xhang -
`7,. Wu - W. Li - B. Williams
`
`ADIS DRUG [iVALl iA'I‘lONS
`
`205Eu
`
`Extended-Release 'l‘aeroliinus: A Review of Its Use in De Noyo Kidney
`
`'l‘ransplanlation
`I’.l.. McCormack
`
`2065
`
`2079
`
`Rioeiguat: A Review of Its Use in Patients with Chronic 'l‘hromlmembolir
`Pulmonary Hypertension or Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
`KJ’. (ial'nuek—Jones
`
`l-ZmtrieitabinefRilpivirinef'l‘enol‘ovir Disoproxil Fumarate Single-'l‘ablet Regimen:
`A Review of Its lise in HIV Infection
`ILD. I.)eeks
`
`R&IJ lNSi(.iIlT RI‘ZI’UR'I‘
`
`20‘)?
`
`Dulaglulide: First (:lobal Approval
`M. Sanford
`
`Further arlieles can be l'uund at |inL.spriugemom
`
`Indexed in Mlt'i MINI-.1 l:'.-I'H5/i.$'lz'. linernnrninn! Pnrn'nnn'ennrnl' ribs-nuns rH’..-l J. 820.875 Previews. ”[0375
`Reviews Reports nnd Meen'nes. ('ni'i'ern ( ‘nmmrsx-“t 'l‘inn'n! Medicine. ( 'in'i'ent (Winners-"Life .N'rienees,
`Srifiein'r'ii. .‘n'i'n'nre ( ‘nnnnn Index. .hnn‘nu! ( 'inniun Reprn'Ist’St‘ieni'e Iz'rn'n'nn, Frans Si'ient'e Integrity.
`(TN/HR. PAM EU, ( Wennr'n/ .-'U:sn':n't.~. Sen-ire. h'm'ietnnt' Ibemnnn’ri:mm ul'e mini-”mun” ( ‘n'niffir'n
`rSiK 'J. and Jinn‘nnhm ()I 'H)
`
`Inslruelions for authors l‘or Durex are available al \\ ww.springi‘t'xonif—ltllhfi
`
`[A Adis
`
`
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`
`
`
`Drugs Gill—it 7'11: luvs Etllfl
`l)t]|
`|li.|iill7ls4lilffi I'll-l-tlfiiifiufi
`
`LEADING ARTICLE
`
`Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer
`Therapies
`
`Kent Shih - Hendrik—'I‘ohins Arkenau -
`
`.leti‘rey R. Infante
`
`Published onlinc: 25 (ictobcr 20H
`
`“1- The Authorts} Jill-l. This article is published nith open access at Springerlinkcom
`
`lmmttne responses are tightly regulated via
`Abstract
`signaling through nttmerous co-stintnlalm'y and co-inhibi-
`tory molecules.
`lisploitation ot‘ these immune checkpoint
`pathways is one ol the mechanisms by which tumors evade
`anth’or escape the immune system. A growing under-
`standing of the biology ol‘ immune checkpoints anti tumor
`immunology has led to the development of monoclonal
`antibodies designed to target co—stimulatory and co—inhib—
`itory molecules in order to rc-engage the immune system
`and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic
`'l'—|yInphoeyte—associated antigen 4 t("l‘l.A—4) antibodies
`were among the lirst
`to be tested in the clinic. and ipi—
`limumab was
`the
`first
`immune checkpoint
`inhibitor
`
`approved l'or an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the
`programmed death I tPl)—l)pathway. either PD—l orone of
`its
`ligands. programmed death ligand I. are in active
`clinical development
`For numerous cancers.
`including
`advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the
`dil'l'erent mechanisms
`ol‘ action.
`safety profiles.
`and
`
`response patterns associated with inhibition of the ("FLA-4
`and PD—l pathways may improve patient management as
`these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting
`and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy
`with different
`inhibitors. Additional
`immune checkpoint
`
`molecules with therapeutic potential. including lymphocyte
`activation
`gene-3
`and
`glucocorticoid-indttced
`tumor
`necrosis factor receptor-related gene. also have inhibitors
`in early stages ol‘ clinical development. Clinical responses
`and sal‘ety data reported to date on immune checkpoint
`
`This article is part ol' the topical collection on |mtnun:i—(lncology.
`—___#__—_
`
`.l, R. Inl'antc
`K. Sliili ti".‘t - l|.-'l'. Arkcnau -
`Sarah t’annou Research Institute and 'l'ennessec {Jncology H .l.( I
`Nashville. TN .ii‘lllfi. l’SA
`e mail: ksliilt(“'IItottc.coitt
`
`inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential
`markedly improve outcomes lor patients with cancer.
`
`to
`
`Key Points
`
`Immune checkpoint inhibitors are designed to
`interrupt inhibitory immune signals and restore
`immune responses against tumors.
`
`Numerous immune checkpoint inhibitors are in
`advanced stages of development and show activity
`across multiple tumor types. including advanced
`melanoma and advanced non—small-cell lung cancer.
`
`Understanding the mechanistn-associated adverse
`events and response patterns is important to the
`management of patients as these drugs are moved
`into the clinical practice setting.
`
`I
`
`Introduction
`
`Rudolph Vircltow may have been one ol‘ the first physi—
`cians in modern times to observe the link between the
`
`imtnunc systetn and malignancy in what he termed “lyin—
`phoreticular intiltrates". 'l'hesc intiltrates were leukocytes
`surrounding malignant
`tumors. and he hypothesized that
`proinllannnatory states might
`induce normal
`tissues to
`
`become malignant [I I. Since then. we have learned a great
`deal about how the immune system responds and reacts to
`tumors. which tumor—specific antigens are recognized as
`foreign. and how immtlne responses can be manipulated
`and harnessed to enhance tumor cell killing.
`
`A Adis
`
`
`
`K. Shill el al.
`| 904
`
`
`Recently. it has been recognized that. on its own. tumor
`peptide presentation by major histocompatibility complex
`tMl-K‘)
`to 'l‘—ccll
`receptors is
`inadequate for successful
`'l‘-cell activation and immune destruction ot‘ cancer cells.
`
`(To-regulatory signals. eitlter inhibitory or stimulatory. are
`also required 12. 3t. T cells play a critical role in cell—
`mediated tutnor itntnunity. and do so through an intricate
`counterbalance ot‘ co—stintulatory and co—inltihitory cell—to-
`celi signals between various components of the immune
`systettt.
`'l‘his systetn of checks and balances is necessary
`ttot only to allow a powerl’ul destructive response against
`both pathogens attd tnalignancies.
`l'ItIl also to prevent
`immune responses from heittg generated against normal
`tissues.
`(.‘t'itical
`‘chcckpoints' control and line-tune the
`immune system through regulation ol' this complex net-
`work ol‘ co—stimulatory and ctr-inhibitory signaling 13}.
`in
`this paper. we review some. of the important
`immune
`checkpoint molecules elucidated to date. as well as el'l'orls
`to block these molecules in order to shift
`the balance
`
`towards antitumor immunity. We also describe some of the
`
`and challenges encountered using these
`complexities
`checkpoint inhibitors in the clinic.
`
`2 Cytotoxic 'I‘-Ivymphoeyte-Associated Antigen
`(C’l‘LAl-4
`
`ll Background
`
`More than 40 years of research has led to the development
`ot‘ a two—signal
`theory ol'
`'l‘—cell activation: antigenic
`stimulation of the 'l'—cell receptor t'l'(‘R) [signal I) together
`with eo-slimulation by other molecules on the cell surl‘ace
`(signal 2) f2. KI. One of the key co~sti|tttllatory mechanisms
`involves tlte interaction ol‘ (1)28 on the surl'ace ol‘ tire T
`
`cell with B? molecules (‘on or €on on antigen—pre—
`senting cells. ("FLA—4. a transmemln'ane glycoprotein with
`considerable homology to CUES. binds to the same l5?
`ligands. as such (Fig.
`it. Upon 'l‘f‘R stimulation by anti-
`gens. T cells express ("FLA—4. which can hittd B7 mole—
`cules: however, unlike (”028.
`(TIA—4 inhibits 'l‘—cc|!
`
`l'or ntaintenance of immune
`important
`responses artd is
`tolerance. Expression ol'
`("FLA—'4 raises the activation
`
`threshold and attenuates clonal expansion: thus. a produc-
`tive. T—cell response ensues only upon a net co—stintttlatory
`signal.
`
`2.2 Hl‘tieacy ol‘ ("FLA—4 inhibitors
`
`2.2.! i‘pit't'initnmb
`
`tpilimumab. one ot‘ the. best—studied monoclonal antibodies
`targeting (."['l.A—4 [table 1
`I4-- top. has been evaluated in
`
`A Adis
`
`Antigen presenting cellt'Tumor
`
`T cell
`
`MHC class I or ll-
`
`GAL9
`
`enso orcnae --q—o'
`\
`
`CD80 or CDSB
`
`F‘D-L‘l or PD-L2
`
`'l‘-ccll activation and immune checkpoint pathways. ‘l'-ce|l
`l
`Fig.
`activation requires tvro signals: tl} presentation ol‘ antigenic peptides
`by MlIC to the TCR and IE: co-stimttlalion. typically via (‘DZKzt'Ufiti
`or ('ozsi‘nse ligation.
`Immune checkpoint pathways comprising
`receptors on T cells and ligands on antigen-presenting cells andi’or
`tumors line—lune immune responses via 'l'—cell activation or inhibition.
`("Fiat-4 cytotoxic 'l‘-lymphocyle—associaletl antigen 4. (MM) galec—
`tin-9. (EH'R glueocorticoid-induccd 'I‘Nl" receptor—related gene. (HT-
`Rl’. gILlcoc:irlicoid—induced 'I‘Nl" receptor-related gene ligand. L-lU-J’
`lymphocyte activation gene-3. MHE.‘ major histoeompatihilily cont—
`ples. PD-i programmed death— I. Pill—{.1 programmed death ligand |.
`{JD-LE programmed death ligand 3. KW 'l‘-cell receptor. 'f'iMa'
`'I'-eell
`immtmoglobulin and ntucin domain 3. TN!" tttlnor necrosis lactor
`
`a clinical trial program of more than 2,000 patients with a
`variety ot‘ solid tumors I4. 5.
`li—l‘Jl.
`lpilimumab (Yer-
`voym J. administered every 3 weeks for four doses. gained
`US FDA approval in 20! | for the treatment ot‘ unreseclable
`or ittetastatic melanoma. based on data from two phase [I]
`randomized trials showing improvement on ntcdian overall
`survival (03) over control arms in patients with melanoma
`
`triais evaluated
`E4. 5. 2(}|. One of the pivotal phase [ll
`ipilitnumab with or without gpitlt] vaccine in previously
`treated patients with advanced melanotna. Although the
`best overall response rates were modest.
`lt).9 '95
`in the i—
`pilittttunab—alone group and 5.? ‘3'?- in the ipilimumah plus
`gplttt) vaccine group. some patients in both groups main—
`tained an objective response For at least ’2 years I4I. In this
`trial. the 3-year OS rate for ipilimumab tnonotherapy was
`20 "it.
`l4]. which cotnpares t‘avorahly with the 3—year ()3
`rate of 13'
`‘Zr. for historical control patients receiving stati—
`dard of care chemotherapy in a separate clinical trial |2t|
`['l'able 2 I4. 5. 7.
`l8.
`l9. 2 | —33l}. The other pivotal phase.
`[ll
`trial was conducted in treatment-naive patients with
`metastatic melanoma
`and compared ipilintuntah pltts
`dacarbazine versus dacarbazine plus placebo [5|. Although
`the dose and schedule Were slightly different.
`the rate ol‘
`best overall
`response was 15 ‘ii
`in the ipilintuntah plus
`dacarhaxinc group versus It) ‘J’r- for the dacarhazine plus
`
`
`
`Immune (‘heckpoinl Inhibitors in Cancer
`
`I‘mfi
`
`Table l
`
`
`Immune checkpoinl inhilnlors in clinical decelopnwnt l-l—lhl
`
`
`
` Name (‘umpany Description of agent
`
`
`
`lpil'nnumah I4. 5|
`‘l'retnelil‘mlnmh |o|
`Peml‘nmtizumah (M K3415} I'll
`Ni\-'olumah {EMS—(136658] |H|
`l‘itlilimmah [CT-{ll I: I‘ll]
`AMP-224 |l[ll
`I'VII’IMJZBUA lll. l3]
`BMS-‘BnSSU llfil
`MliDHT-lo II-ll
`lMl’32] ||5|
`TRXSIX ||6|
`
`lluman lgUl mAh against ("ILA-4
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`l-lunlan lg(i3 mAh againsl ("HA-4
`Med]mnumelAslraZencca
`Ilnnlanixed lg(i—l tnAh against I’D-l
`Merek
`Human IgCE-l mA‘n againsl I’D—l
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`l-lunlanired lgUl mAh againsl PD-l
`(‘ure'l'eelt
`|’I)-l.3-lg(i I‘UCtll'Ill'lll'lillll
`l'usion prolcin
`Amplimmune'. (llamSmilhKlinc
`lluman lg(i mAlu agaiusl I’D-H
`(ienenleeln’Roclte
`Human lgG-J nmh aga'tnsl I’ll—Ll
`BrisIoI-Myers Squibb
`Human nmh againsl l’l)—l.|
`MedlmmanefAsIraZeneca
`Soluble LAG-3 lg I'usion protein and MIIC' elass‘ || agonisl
`lmmulep
`
`GITR. Inc llumanized mAh against (il‘l‘R
`
`immu—
`.u'gt’;
`(‘HAA-J cytotoxic ‘[‘-l5mphoeyte-assnc'talcd anligen 4. (EUR gluesJeorlicoid-indueed Imnur necrosis factor receplolwrelaled gene.
`noglohulin (F. Uta-fl lymphocyle aelivalion gene-3. mx‘th momelonal antibody, MHC major hisloconunuihilit)‘ complex. I’D-I programmed
`death I. I’D-H programmed death ligand l. Hit-L3 programmed death ligand 2
`
`Table 2 Preliminary el'licacy data will] immune checkpoint
`El 33]
`
`l‘nead—lo-ltead: Irials" l4. 5. 7. 17.
`inhihilors or controls from individual tnut
`
`
`IX.
`
`Median 08
`Survival rale
`Rel'erencetst
`Athaneed tumor setting
`Agent or cnnlrnl
`Median l’l-‘S
`__—_.————-—-—-——-—-—————
`
`Melanoma
`
`(‘TX (("l‘X-mn‘ve pls}
`
`ND
`
`l).l—lt).? months
`
`lpilinnunah
`'I'remelimumah
`
`Pemhrolizulnah
`Nivolunlal‘n
`
`l’itlilimmah
`
`Nimlumah plus ipilimunlah
`
`2}) monlhs
`NI.)
`
`5.5 monlhs
`3.? months
`
`1.9 munlhs
`
`37 weeks
`
`HM monlhs
`12.6 months
`NR
`17.3 months
`
`NI)
`4“ months
`
`NSCIL‘
`
`("I‘X [(“l‘X-nai've pls]:
`
`4.3 monlhs
`
`3.3 months
`
`l’elnl'nmlimmab
`
`Ill—3'." necks"
`
`SI neeks
`
`|-_\‘ear: if) fit
`3-year:
`l2—l7 9?
`Buyeur: 220 ‘5'}
`J‘s-ear: 2! ‘3’}
`1-year:
`(3‘) Eli
`1—year: ()3 fit
`fi—year: 4|
`‘St
`1-year: (15 ‘9?
`1-year: 35 ‘9}
`2-year: 7‘) ‘9?
`|-_\rear: 3‘) {'1'
`2-year:
`l8 9.5
`NI)
`
`Niwnlumuh ipreviously-lI’ealcd pts:
`
`2.3 months
`
`9.9! nlonlhs
`
`1-year: 43 {it
`3-year: 34 G?
`1-year: 19 ("Ir
`3-year: t 25 “.4
`25-year: k 35 ‘9}
`l-year: 4t} ‘3?
`_ year
`IS "t
`1-year: 4T ‘3:
`| Ll Inunlhs
`4.“ months
`lpilimnmah
`
`
`IS. 21]
`
`H]
`I2”
`|7|
`IZZ
`
`IE}!
`IE—H
`
`113]
`
`|25--27l
`
`|28|
`
`|2*J|
`|3tl- HI
`[331
`Hill
`
`||?|
`
`R(‘{"
`
`(‘RPC
`
`Nix-'oltnnah [(‘TX-na'l're plst
`Soral'enih
`l‘vl'n-‘olumal:l
`
`Placebo
`
`3o.l weeks
`3.6—5.7 months
`3.1—4.2" months
`
`1| nlnnllts
`
`NR
`l I.(l- 10.2 months
`”.2443“ months
`Ill.” mnnllts
`
`('Ri’t‘.‘ eastration—resistant ln'oslale cancer. (TX chemotherapy. ND no data. NR nnl reached. N.S'('I.(' non small-cell
`survival. I’I'ZS' progressiondl‘ree survival. prs pallenls. Rt‘t’ renal cell carcinoma
`"
`lmporlanl: data an: not from head-lo-head Irials. and the II'ials dil't'cr It}; patienl characteristics. paliem numhcrs. and length nl' follow-up.
`lhcrel'ore direct comparisons across Irials and agenls have limited validilyz trials in tumor Iypes wilh l’l"S and ()3 data were included
`" Based on differing studies and dalal-cnls
`‘ hose-tlepemlcnl
`
`lung cancer. 05' overall
`
`L\ Adis
`
`
`
`K. Sliili et al.
`l‘J‘Jo
`—___—___—————_——-———
`
`placebo group. while lltc median dttration ol‘ response was
`19.3 versus til months for the dacarbaaine plus placebo
`group. Responses lasting at least 2 years were observed in
`both treatment groups. The 3—year survival rate with ipi—
`litntunab plus dacarbaxine was significantly higher than
`dacarbazine plus placebo: 20.8 versus IEQ ‘9’? ti" 6 l).(l[l| l.
`lpilimumab was evaluated as adiuvant therapy INIou-ing
`complete resection of stage Ill melanoma ill a phase III
`trial
`in patients at high risk ol' recurrence I34]. Patients
`receiving ipilimtttnab had a signilicantly increased median
`US as compared with patients receiving placebo: lot
`versus Ill months {P _' (liltilil.
`'l'he 3~ycar
`rates ol‘
`recurrence—tree survival were 47 9:
`for
`ipilimumab and
`35 ‘Ii- for placebo.
`chemotherapy can
`that
`suggest
`Preclinical
`studies
`indttce the release ol‘ tumor—specific antigens. thereby ini—
`tiating 'l'—cell activation and sensitizing tumor cells to
`’l‘—cell—tnediated killing I35l. These observations provided
`the rationale t'or combining inmmnotlterapy with cytotoxic
`agents to improve responses in patients with melanoma.
`and also led to the initiation of clinical
`trials evaluating
`
`ipilimumab with chemotherapy in lung cancer. A phase II.
`randomized study provided evidence that sequential
`ipi—
`Iiinumab is more effective than concurrent
`ipilitnumab
`when administered with paelitaxeltearbtiplatin in chemo—
`therapy—naive stage. [“8er patients with non—small-cell
`lttng cancer INSCII). The median 08 with sequential
`i—
`pilimumab. concurrent
`ipilimumab. and the control
`regi—
`men was IZQ. 9.7. and 8.3 months. respectively.
`In this
`trial. patients with squamous histology exhibited better
`outcomes [median immune-related progression-tree sur—
`vival
`|irPliSl and US) with sequential
`ipilimumah dosing
`than did patients with non-squamous histology list. Based
`on these findings. a phase III trial evaluating ()S in patients
`with squamous NSCLC.‘ receiving sequential
`ipilimumab
`alter chemotherapy was initiated [Table 3 | loll.
`lpilitnumah is also being investigated in the setting of
`metastatic castration—resistant prostate cancer ('m('RP('}. in a
`
`phase lll trial ot' ipilimumab versus placebo in post—docetasel
`patients with mC‘RPC receiving a single dose of radiother—
`apy, the primary endpoint of ()5 was not reached: hoWever.
`pre-spccilied subset analyses suggested that ipilitntttnab may
`he more active in patients with favorable prognostic l'actors.
`including no visceral disease. alkaline phosphatase (11.5
`upper
`limit ol' normal. and hemoglobin :ll gi’dl.
`ll7l.
`Rcsults from this study support
`the investigation ol‘
`ipi-
`limumab in the ongoing phase it]. (.‘Alti—l—U95 study among
`chemotlierapy—naive patients with m(‘Rl’(’ t'l‘able 3 [top
`
`2.2.2 7i‘t'mct't'mttmrth
`
`Tremelimtmiab is a hilly human immunoglobulin (E tlg(.it-
`2 monoclonal antibody targeting ("ILA—4 Iol t'l'able I H
`
`A Adis
`
`loll. 'l'rcmelimunuib provided durable responses in (if) "/0
`ol' patients in a phase [[
`trial of patients with advanced
`melanoma. as compared with the objective response rates
`(ORRsl of 5.7 and 10.9 ‘24 seen in the phase Ill
`trial ot'
`
`ipilinttttnab with or without vaccine I4. bl. However. the
`phase.
`[ll
`trial of tremelinmmab monotherapy failed to
`demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage
`over chemotherapy in lirst~1inc treatment ot~ patients with
`metastatic melanoma till ]. Patient selection criteria. dosing
`
`regimen. anti use of ipilimumab as salvage therapy for
`patients in the control arm were potential reasons for the
`lack of survival benetit.
`
`'l‘remelimumab showed evidence of activity against
`
`previously treated malignant mesothelioma in a small
`tN : 29} phase It single—arm trial l36|.
`l't‘out’ patients had
`partial
`responses. and It patients had stable disease at
`median duration 7.? months {range 2.(i—|6.6+l. with a
`median ()8 til I 1.3 months. Based on these results. a phase
`
`trial of tremelimumab in malignant mesothelioma has
`II
`been initiated t'l'able J | loll.
`
`2.3 Sat'ety ol‘ (TIA—4 Inhibitors
`
`The cumulative safety data across many trials show that
`agents that inhibit ("FLA-4 are generally safe. with unique.
`but usually manageable. side el’t‘ects that are linked to their
`tnechanistn ol' stimulating immune responses. Multiple
`phase It and III
`trials have characterized these immune-
`related adverse events tit'Al‘Ls) of CTLA-4 inhibition.
`()verall.
`irAlis vvere observed in SSw-(fl ‘70 of patients
`
`treated with ipilimumab. with 5—26 % of patients experi—
`encing grade 3:4 irAEs I4. [7. 3?] {Table 414.18, l2—l4.
`ii. 2t. 2.3. 2b. 28. 3h. 38-401).
`In the phase III
`trial
`investigating ipilimumab treatment with or without vac—
`cine. skin—related irALis (including pruritus. rash. and ery—
`themal and gastrointestinal
`irAlis (including diarrhea and
`colitis} were the tnost common. occurring in 29—44 9t.- ot‘
`patients; endocrine disorders were reported in 4—8 9?: ot‘
`patients Hf. Some of the more rare adverse events (Alisl
`
`reported during treatment with ipi—
`for each)
`til'l Ci
`litmtmah include uveitis. conjunctivitis. and neuropathy
`[37].
`Interestingly. when ipilimumah was given with
`dacarbarine.
`immune-mediated grade 314 hepatitis occur—
`red in 32 Ut- of patients. while the rates of gastrointestinal
`events. such as coiitis. were lower titan expected based on
`previous trials I5I. As adjuvant therapy. ipilimttmah had a
`sal'ety prolile generally consistent with that seen in patients
`with advanced melanoma. although the incidence ot‘ some
`irAlis
`leg. endoerinopathiesl was higher. Also.
`live
`patients (I 9t ] in the ipilimumab artn died due to treatment-
`related Alis versus {1 patients in the placebo group [34L
`'l'remelimumab has a similar irAli profile to ipilimumab.
`The most
`common
`irAlis with
`tremelimumab were
`
`
`
`.u
`
`| 5“}?
`
`mO”.Cuccsuom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`qum:fi.9...m03.....EF.2.3HEwE..EuumUJUmZ3983.3.Eutaflri9min:.295323....+Luca—ash:T.5.5.95.5...mcanmmCm.mn—m.mOpinnacuvm33.9:25.1...E3135...hgamma...ka
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9x.m_m_.....UZmaizfinewm0“LESTE.33...H5mEGmco$55.2:3.266....._c0359335..24...,aim....n.LnE:E..E.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xcEmgarUz._.=...«...m.:n:3maxREEF.2.3H.2m:..cm:05......25:29:..2van...itimi:.95323.3c.5535:n...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m...“an..-u.um§§.uE.mEEE3.4.3:;E576.mO“.Cmccouum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.00but:..n>..r=.u
`
`
`
`
`
`£3.43:kaSamBOEIH50m0”banana2...;HEm::.:b...~.32.5.6...3.3.5::.m......c..5..n..:52.3.5.1:.3LmEEEE.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fimlflfihuz«Eu9:v.3.51....7.oE..-uu:ut:uom”DEE...—ECm...H.2m:__.:....u~.52.2.23..5.c:.ems:42...;wi:—ficc.5m_....inah—4E2?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21.3.:be9.53.2;m3...62:752....2.3.5..$8.3m”baa—tn—...EH.:m:..5m...O.35...3.2.9.9...£3223...pizzemci:b.3529...F5.25::
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9:...downwamsaEu...5.2...:Min.wtwwcouum
`
`
`
`
`
`..__...2...>.....ncoE.5:-.._c:E3323;0.
`
`
`
`.53....,..._...._...£.
`
`
`
`
`
`m:_n55.2.6.16.5.961:59....(mmytgcgom
`
`
`
`£3.53:3.35....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.._xn,...:_:_..b2mamExam...“:2.m03.35.55::H.....9...:ch.355225......267.232..:32.......1...LE:::...a.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.m2.6on.98:5...M5.23955.2...25:3.0...3.2....5355.....EEEE...m53:52
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.3....bEEEBEEEM1.59.1.525.553.2:..3...35...;.5839....3...Ema...
`
`
`
`
`
`.imL4......__.=..___..r.__..m135
`
`FM.35....m5..—
`
`
`
`
`
`.5E3232;M.ct.m......_..uz.2553.57..m0”bursts.:5...H2..wizauuxUAUm351......»755mE3269.5+L_E__.E_.__....:
`
`
`.m.EzEfi...W.SanMOD.MmOm.mnE:.mO”53.56%$31.23.“.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.35:...07.Son.57..0...?“magiS...HSmango;2.0..qu.3»:z:LmEnEzfi.
`
`3:95.32.
`
`
`
`
`
`1T...1......EEE£5932...255:....32.3.5.33...._:1:...33.5%.mgr..szmmink.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mama._:....U./.23m2.3....mun.:EoEé”buzz...1....H.39.69.0nEcEfiE2.1.7595.:3.5.0.3023.+55:55:...—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HERREFUZc...“.2.m0“mantra.mm.HEchsz£5.16.on5.32.59.5.2...335.64.:J...»LnE:E...E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`...52.5.5.5.
`
`
`
`
`
`.50£memuo333.8%5...:.923331....35...2...ESEEEU:.En.o....c....2..u
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0:.“Own..mOQMUD.MMOQ.mnE.Cfixauum9:9:9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$3.3:thEcm$3.4...“.3mun...”tint“..I.Hz.3......qu9...2.75m£51.32:.0uEEEzEF.:.3BEE—.7.x...Liz—fizz...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.35....31.7.0...
`
`
`
`.35....9...?an
`
`
`
`
`
`.00cream.5......Ecuom.99ch15.33.2...Ln-.o.xn:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”30m....mO.mun.H2......9568m.325....aumwzaczkzfimw0.5...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|||II|J|I||||1III||
`
`£\ Adis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.00.ungi3.0....mmc.mnmn.”Cnuccgm350232...LnE...c..:+LnE:..:..E..1...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`| 998
`
`K. Shih cl ill.
`
`EaseE;
`
`EsEngta:BmEEm—9:6.HEEEEu
`
`
`
`:53ch$335
`
`25:3.9:
`
`doc.55.WEdun_.:%:8.Jm
`
`Vagoo5&3
`
`Ema—.7._ELK
`
`29“E:m0”.CmEE
`
`
`Sm:HSmcEEuum:ScmssE2529322...
`
`nmcmgzvhbz
`
`can5.2335m.,._...._?..m..E.mo5.55:“.
`
`
`
`53HEmirauum37593.0;:35:£32.35
`
`MODMED”ngogm
`
`nquFZFU.
`
`canEfimzumE:
`
`mo.95“turnta—
`
`::m.H:.mEomcoET:=EEEEEcounskufi
`
`a."dew_ELF.
`
`Ecmiii—.5”Hi.
`
`
`
`MOQ.mMO”ban—55m
`
`m0.mun—”fa—“E..—
`
`MEG“Cagauom
`
`€295LEESanEdie"..th
`
`
`
`:2fix.an..FUZ
`
`fl_WE;_2.07.
`
`
`
`1mm5..EHUZ
`
`cwmxmachuz
`
`is““.5553:2
`
`
`
`3.5ngSEE.Hing»;
`
`
`
`”ECwanuimauafimtmoyfi”.Cnncouum
`
`
`
`
`
`MUD.MmOm.mnE.mmnE.mO”.Cfiécoom
`
`
`
`Evin—:25.bénz
`
`iimzakbx
`
`2:“9.312m3.
`
`Emm3#:HUZ
`
`E:m.522.Hcm.52
`
`
`
`1—00MEL..xOD54.555
`
`mO”.CuEtm
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0;.mnEuvfiugdfi“.Cmvcoflm
`
`
`
`.93.:.m0mt..mnE”.CnE—ouom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`323%.:63732:5.95".Cwucouom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`53:52;3.9a.mk.mmo...c883m
`
`Emma
`
`In
`
`
`
`3.1.2332»:35333E:
`
`
`
`
`
`UJUmZ:uumania:23:22:
`
`
`
`:8macs—Sumac:33522.:
`
`
`
`335.5,;msnap.
`
`llu||||€llln§|||
`
`m5“22%ch.50umcomzom“biztm
`
`
`
`2;»H5mEEEuumE?»UJUmZ525:22.4
`
`:
`
`23m:3.MO:.95.:“bursts.
`
`
`
`
`EmcEfiuum59:5:290
`
`:
`
`EonLonzlcnnun.mmO339$:de”.taEmi
`
`
`
`5.:HE@5ch1.38839£5555E8335.64
`
`=
`
`5E.“Nas,8sz=3
`
`
`
`EEEwE3521....
`
`
`
`311.722:EEL352E:
`
`
`
`5...:UAUmz5355:3»:
`
`naEnwzofiEum
`
`naczwzoiEum
`
`33:5Esau
`
`nmEonz
`
`5.33MES
`
`c2553.?
`
`G3HEszEUuM237.32:.5oysfiuqucu
`
`22:25E.3£23353?qu
`
`:—
`
`fl—r—OEEDF:
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`.3LE:=~:En:B¢
`
`13:55:23?
`
`2:95:32
`
`0159...,“
`
`:C:
`
`7.53395.3QESETJEEE
`
`55215935
`
`??qu.355:32:32.2...
`
`i::::$.x.§....h
`
`:Eofifiamu—z
`
`
`
`”MK33%5....Ext._n.:__:._£:$l
`
`$25...man:—
`
`Tan—
`
`
`
`
`
`um;in...main;E3233...
`
`3.53
`
`3th
`
`
`
`531.3%...“HG—Esau.
`
`
`
`ugh.SEE.
`
`Umhfi.
`
`L\Ad
`
`
`
`52HEmcEEuumUAUmzusamfluEEatsuum
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`36:93am4..£353.12
`
`mEEtn—
`
`
`
`UJUwZ
`
`
`
`
`
`3.?H5$1,..szhouneasy—umcan“:b.5255
`
`E
`
`31338.3Lasagzz
`
`
`mo.5533%-UE”.EEE
`
`
`
`2.6“H59.5.3.0.5325.6:323.:32.52995
`
`:—
`
`3:63:.5£353.42
`
`
`
`
`
`lnmlunc (.‘hcckpuinl Inhibitor. in Cancer
`
`
`
`
`
`.50£535:E33:“:35
`
`
`
`”E.mmc...»...§:c.5w
`
`.400
`
`
`
`AGO...3._._an£
`
`
`
`
`
`3.3m.Mm—O.Mn—n—rtwficsuum:EccfioE51.52....ch5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m...m:m_o._b7..2350.9350m0r3553...:20HS5:553.u.__._5...¥.u..:.._533.......»._....:c_.6..n._:592:29.7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MGMini
`
`
`
`.mnEb.5959...“UUM
`
`
`
`
`
`$552...ar23a“...—moS.....E....n_.nnm.I.59.5:...qu..._.....fi.....E5“52:29.523:-2mE3E:ob.6.1.»99:35.22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”Emma50......going—5E
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0m.MCQ.MMO.mnE203::qubum:uuaau—u
`
`
`
`Chm—SNAFU?mamE:m0..h_.u._nm3.3._._n_5.3HEmCEPSeM9:5..meE—m“59.5.53..—:.5L:_::75_Z
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`«SmQHCFLZis...:5...min.”5.35:;52H.3mcEEUomany;3......5y..5...:........:55:323.:£2235»;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mmO.mui.xmu.MOD”.Cutccuum3.2.5.5..:3-..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.9.5.2....UZtan23:25:3mo.mnE.......E....n_.2:HEmE..Eoum5::.52.5:57....45.5.:..E..u...m:_5:52:17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MMCh.9595..er5:25.5333:
`
`| 999
`
`
`
`nCL..:..._....m3w....
`
`
`
`.55...555%...2.35::........5:aumm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“coco—:35?ICHmum.z....5_5._.H.,.._.E__._mF...HEm:_._.:...um-33....=55...:+LEEfiEEm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$2.2...FUZ..._..m9.9.13.3553:...BEEFE..».._.__£z_..o.._5.5:;.nmH.25:553..35533%;...magi}.:5.43332...+€955:ch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5:...537.......§.:...,...§_..E3.55:5“.£5553....12:Uawn...2:...9.5.2.Enchant...._...._..32.;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xmommm5.522:“5.22:“m3.beam._>..a..:_.n_.2:HEmaiden”.25:35::2.2233:53:596...:5:52:32..-€535.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EENozFUZ...._:mEilcm.3.«mo3.55:::7“.HS@550233523....5355......5.75.5.5:.3:nE:E:E.+:=E_._5>2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mun—ucamac.mnE”Canccunm5:98—229:37.23....5Luau—.559.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2..m.55......
`
`5:55:32.
`
`
`
`an::251E325:35:..2235.55::.55....qu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.m......._.U./..can5.22%2.2.4mo.MMO...,.....E:m5......HS@555E?»ageing.535.6...E.55539.83:.1.»€9.23?.BEEEE3.0...—.mun—“9.258%:EEEE.r...a.5.2.»..on3::2.95::9.Eu5._........._EE...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VENEEHUZman52......5m5mmorang...5:.H2.55:...quu_:_.....u.,....:.:1335:...$323.55gingham:.522:35.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`31.5....57.:3“:.._...m_:m32mun—“...EEE5m.H.29:9ch=3-...2...25:122.:5355.54.:€535.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`400gum—EEELLsEEE._.E
`
`com
`
`.550
`
`
`
`m0.me.mnE”.Csnccuum.3LEEEEE+LEE:.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.0.mmn—”CancouumuEEnzmécn—Eumu+
`
`
`
`fl Adis
`
`
`
`1.22.5.3.stuEEcEEuz
`
`9.552693
`
`
`
`:.3.55.8...:...._:u.......v..n__
`
`
`
`55:823.55
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0.».NEO.muEreinccuum2:55.355:22.32....5.i€52»;.n:+LnEBc.:
`
`
`
`
`
`35.2.5.5m~33.
`
`
`
`
`
`EUUI)
`
`K. Shih el :ll.
`
`vi539.
`
`
`
`
`
`.muE.mOQ.sz..,.E_Es......m9sz357.32:
`
`fiufifchuzman.32mMO”bangin—5:H5mcEnbom53945.452:523.mzon.:.fln_:«ucxmqun—Hz
`
`
`
`Mm.mO.HCL.ran—4:38.,“
`
`...:..;.M30?:4..
`
`r555m..:._l_
`
`_._.n_.u_
`
`
`
`
`
`ashtfipruz:3“:3.MO65.7..”GEEK.5...HEszauum7.2.DsSE._B.5tumgflum:”EEQEEE+LSEESGE
`
`
`
`
`
`|||ulll||lll|l|||||llll|||l|
`
`llll|ll|l|ll|l|ll|||l||||||rt|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.EEEuEES.352C25573237.n—.;.:__amc:u_8_::UEma;3E."SE“;2253:.EE.CHE.
`
`33..2233—5525:3.3:BEE51.05%.52532...
`
`
`
`
`
`3...:SEE.
`
`UflflcflflhcuM¢_£3H.
`
`A Adis
`
`
`
`
`
`258$;kaSCH5.23:.“.52m0“.I.._:E_._n_53w.H5mzfiauumUHumZ£22mBE.5$255.64.:_uz§uuou.54.3mnm4cm;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.533.mnE.mO33:5..qu2::_:::_EEhuts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mO.mnE.MODӣ59593.p.752.953133:
`
`
`
`
`
`..400
`
`
`
`
`
`323“:pr2:“.3?macinfirm5.3mHEmafiauum.613:36...3..2:...an:{gnaw—CE).
`
`In—43....de
`
`
`
`
`
`RacauctzE...“:2moTSEE5%us3.228”.38.23.21.32:.62052}.E35:82...,..,«23.49%».
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mnE.MO..:u._um2:24:33.3::_5352;Luca
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nwnwxicfiuzcam.32WE”infirmSEHEmcEEuum.2.5212.55::.,._V.:o_.ru._m:S«Swain—LE
`
`
`
`
`.mG.MCD.mO.mun—h....Cnu=:uumbum$3232:.5“43:351..9...LsEiSFS;+zucmnmAn—mfi
`
`
`
`
`.vE£5255.
`
`..mOQ
`
`ZED
`
`
`
`
`
`mnexfiznchbzcan:SESM52”ED“bu—ct;5.3.H5mcEEuum332:2