throbber
2014, Vol. 74, N0. 17 (pp. 1983—2104)
`ISSN; 0012—66617 (Print); 1179-1950 (Online)
`
`
`
`Drugs
`
`
` Adis Drug Eva .
`
`
`-_ns
`
`'.
`‘
`Riociguat
`.-
`:.'{-.
`"
`Extended-Release T-..
`
`EmtricitabincJRilpi'I-irin'fi"
`r -
`‘r DF
`
`Current Opinion
`._
`
`Phosphodiesterasc Inhibitors ‘.'_' CPI}
`
`
`
`
`
`Leading Article
`Checkpoint Inhibitors as Nova;- '-< ncer Therapies
`
`_ Review Articles
`Oral Anticoagulams
`. nsion Guidelines
`
`",
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`
`f}
`
`P
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago
`PG R201 9-00002
`
`
`
`
`MEDICINE
`/
`
`
`

`

`Drugs
`
`Aims and Scope
`
`Drags promotes optimttm
`pharmacotherapy by providing a
`programme of review articles covering
`the most important aspects of clinical
`pharmacology and therapeutics.
`
`The Journal ittclttdes:
`
`- Leadingr'currcnt opiniott articles
`providing an overview of etnergittg or
`contentious issues
`
`- DelinitiVe reviews til' drugs and drug
`classes and their place in patient
`tntlttagetttenl
`
`- Therapy in Practice articles irtclttding
`recommendations for specific clinical
`sttuattons
`
`- High-quality original clinical research
`- Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the
`properties and place in therapy of both
`newer and established drugs
`‘- Adis R&D Insight Reports summarising
`development at first global approval
`
`All manuscripts are subject to peer
`review by international experts. Letters
`to the editor are welcomed and will be
`
`considered For publication.
`
`Copyright Information
`For Author's
`
`As soon as an article is accepted for
`publication. authors will be requested
`to assign copyright of the article (or
`to grant exclusive. publication and
`dissemination rights) to the publisher
`(respective the owner if other than
`Springer). This will ensure the widest
`possible. protection and dissemination of
`ittlorttttttititt under copyright laws.
`More information :tboul copyright
`regulations l'or tliisjournal is available at
`www.springercontMUZGS
`For Rt’rtt’lt'tzt'
`While the advice and information in this
`
`journal is believed to be true and accurate
`at the date ol‘ its publication. neither the
`authors. the editors. nor the pttblisher can
`accept arty legal responsibility for any
`errors or omissions that may have been
`made. The publisher makes no warranty.
`express or implied. with respect to the
`material contained ltercin.
`
`./_\ Adis
`
`All articles published in this journal
`are protected by copyright. which covers
`the exclusive rights to reproduce attd
`distribute the article te.g., as offprints}.
`as well as all translation rights. No
`material published in this journal may
`be reproduced photographically or
`stored on tnicroliltn. itt electronic data
`bases. on video disks. etc.. without
`
`first obtaining written permission from
`the publisher {respective tlte. copyright
`owner il‘other than Springer). The use
`ol' general descriptive names. trade
`names. trademarks. etc.. in this
`
`publication. even il‘ not specifically
`identified. does not imply that these
`names are. not protected by the relevant
`laws and regulations.
`Springer has partnered with Copyright
`Clearance (‘emer's Rightsl.ink service
`to offer a variety of options for reusing
`Springer content. For permission to
`reuse our contettt please locate the
`material that you wish to use on linls.
`springer.com or on springerirnages.eom
`and click on the permissions link or
`go to copyrightcorn and ettter the
`title ol‘ the publication that yott wish
`to use. For assistance in placing
`a permission request. Copyright
`(‘lcarance (”enter can be contacted
`
`directly via phone: +1—855—239v34lfi,
`lax: + l -‘)7li—(t4(1—li(i(lll or e—mail:
`
`inl‘o((_t_}copyright.cottt.
`
`© Springer lntcrnatiomtl Publishing
`Switzerland 2tl|4
`
`Journal Website
`
`www.springercontrzitiZoS
`Electronic edition: |ink.springcr.comt
`jou rna liléll 1265
`
`‘t' We rlrrtr’rt't'os (North. South. ("carrot
`rltiterir‘o and the Caribbean)
`Springer Journal Fulfillment
`233 Spring Street. New York
`NY ”HHS-H73. USA
`Tel: SUD-SPRINGER 077-4643):
`2 l 2—460— I500 (outside North America}
`journals—ny@springer.cont:
`scrviciostlyfizlspringercom
`{Central attd South America}
`
`Outside the Arttt't'it'rrs
`
`Springer Customer Service Center (imbll
`Haberstr. 7'. ()9 | 2(1 Heidelberg. Germany
`Tel.: +49-(i221-345-4303
`
`sttbscriptions@springer.com
`
`Advertisements
`
`[-i—mail contact: advertising(a_3sprittgercom
`or anaeigenfiflspringercom
`
`Disclaimer
`
`Springer publishes advertisements
`in this journal in reliance upon the
`responsibility ol'the advertiser to comply
`with all legal requirements relating to the
`marketing and sale ol‘ products or services
`advertised. Springer and the editors are
`not responsible for claims made iii the
`advertisements published iii the journal.
`The appearance ol'advertisements in
`Springer publications does not constitute
`endorsement, implied or intended. ol' the
`product advertised or the claims made for
`it by the. advertiser.
`
`Office of Publication
`
`Springer International Publishing AU.
`Gewerbestralle l l.(533ll f‘ham. Switzerland
`
`Springer lttternational Publishing is part of
`Springer Science+Business Media
`
`Subscription Information
`
`Drags is published IS times a year.
`Volume 74 t 18 issues} will be published
`in 2014.
`
`Editorial Staff
`Editorial Director: Diana Faulds
`Editorial Assistant: Carole Pearson
`
`ISSN: lltil 2-6667 print
`ISSN:
`l l79-l95tl electronic
`
`For information on subscription rates
`please contact Springer Customer
`Service Center:
`
`

`

`Drugs
`
`Vmume74- Nundwrl7-
`
`2014
`
`CURRENT OPINION
`
`l 983
`
`i993
`
`2015
`
`2033
`
`Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors l'or (‘hronie Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:
`What Does the Future Hold?
`
`MI}. Malera - I’. Rogliani . L. (‘alxella - M. Canola
`
`LEADING ARTICLE
`
`Clinical lmpael oi'Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel (.‘aneer 'I'herapies
`K. Shih - H.-T. Arkenau - .l.R, Inl‘anle
`
`REVIEW ARTICLES
`
`New Ural Antieoagulants for the ‘l'reatment ol' Venous 'l‘hromboembolism:
`Understanding Differences and Similarities
`HP. Dohesh - .l. I‘anikos
`
`Updated National and International I-Iyperlension Guidelines: A Review
`of Current Reeormnendations
`
`S. Kjeldsen - RD. Feltiman . L. Lisheng - .i.-J. Mlllll'llli v(‘.—L-'. ('Iiiang . W. Xhang -
`7,. Wu - W. Li - B. Williams
`
`ADIS DRUG [iVALl iA'I‘lONS
`
`205Eu
`
`Extended-Release 'l‘aeroliinus: A Review of Its Use in De Noyo Kidney
`
`'l‘ransplanlation
`I’.l.. McCormack
`
`2065
`
`2079
`
`Rioeiguat: A Review of Its Use in Patients with Chronic 'l‘hromlmembolir
`Pulmonary Hypertension or Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
`KJ’. (ial'nuek—Jones
`
`l-ZmtrieitabinefRilpivirinef'l‘enol‘ovir Disoproxil Fumarate Single-'l‘ablet Regimen:
`A Review of Its lise in HIV Infection
`ILD. I.)eeks
`
`R&IJ lNSi(.iIlT RI‘ZI’UR'I‘
`
`20‘)?
`
`Dulaglulide: First (:lobal Approval
`M. Sanford
`
`Further arlieles can be l'uund at |inL.spriugemom
`
`Indexed in Mlt'i MINI-.1 l:'.-I'H5/i.$'lz'. linernnrninn! Pnrn'nnn'ennrnl' ribs-nuns rH’..-l J. 820.875 Previews. ”[0375
`Reviews Reports nnd Meen'nes. ('ni'i'ern ( ‘nmmrsx-“t 'l‘inn'n! Medicine. ( 'in'i'ent (Winners-"Life .N'rienees,
`Srifiein'r'ii. .‘n'i'n'nre ( ‘nnnnn Index. .hnn‘nu! ( 'inniun Reprn'Ist’St‘ieni'e Iz'rn'n'nn, Frans Si'ient'e Integrity.
`(TN/HR. PAM EU, ( Wennr'n/ .-'U:sn':n't.~. Sen-ire. h'm'ietnnt' Ibemnnn’ri:mm ul'e mini-”mun” ( ‘n'niffir'n
`rSiK 'J. and Jinn‘nnhm ()I 'H)
`
`Inslruelions for authors l‘or Durex are available al \\ ww.springi‘t'xonif—ltllhfi
`
`[A Adis
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`
`
`
`Drugs Gill—it 7'11: luvs Etllfl
`l)t]|
`|li.|iill7ls4lilffi I'll-l-tlfiiifiufi
`
`LEADING ARTICLE
`
`Clinical Impact of Checkpoint Inhibitors as Novel Cancer
`Therapies
`
`Kent Shih - Hendrik—'I‘ohins Arkenau -
`
`.leti‘rey R. Infante
`
`Published onlinc: 25 (ictobcr 20H
`
`“1- The Authorts} Jill-l. This article is published nith open access at Springerlinkcom
`
`lmmttne responses are tightly regulated via
`Abstract
`signaling through nttmerous co-stintnlalm'y and co-inhibi-
`tory molecules.
`lisploitation ot‘ these immune checkpoint
`pathways is one ol the mechanisms by which tumors evade
`anth’or escape the immune system. A growing under-
`standing of the biology ol‘ immune checkpoints anti tumor
`immunology has led to the development of monoclonal
`antibodies designed to target co—stimulatory and co—inhib—
`itory molecules in order to rc-engage the immune system
`and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic
`'l'—|yInphoeyte—associated antigen 4 t("l‘l.A—4) antibodies
`were among the lirst
`to be tested in the clinic. and ipi—
`limumab was
`the
`first
`immune checkpoint
`inhibitor
`
`approved l'or an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the
`programmed death I tPl)—l)pathway. either PD—l orone of
`its
`ligands. programmed death ligand I. are in active
`clinical development
`For numerous cancers.
`including
`advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the
`dil'l'erent mechanisms
`ol‘ action.
`safety profiles.
`and
`
`response patterns associated with inhibition of the ("FLA-4
`and PD—l pathways may improve patient management as
`these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting
`and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy
`with different
`inhibitors. Additional
`immune checkpoint
`
`molecules with therapeutic potential. including lymphocyte
`activation
`gene-3
`and
`glucocorticoid-indttced
`tumor
`necrosis factor receptor-related gene. also have inhibitors
`in early stages ol‘ clinical development. Clinical responses
`and sal‘ety data reported to date on immune checkpoint
`
`This article is part ol' the topical collection on |mtnun:i—(lncology.
`—___#__—_
`
`.l, R. Inl'antc
`K. Sliili ti".‘t - l|.-'l'. Arkcnau -
`Sarah t’annou Research Institute and 'l'ennessec {Jncology H .l.( I
`Nashville. TN .ii‘lllfi. l’SA
`e mail: ksliilt(“'IItottc.coitt
`
`inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential
`markedly improve outcomes lor patients with cancer.
`
`to
`
`Key Points
`
`Immune checkpoint inhibitors are designed to
`interrupt inhibitory immune signals and restore
`immune responses against tumors.
`
`Numerous immune checkpoint inhibitors are in
`advanced stages of development and show activity
`across multiple tumor types. including advanced
`melanoma and advanced non—small-cell lung cancer.
`
`Understanding the mechanistn-associated adverse
`events and response patterns is important to the
`management of patients as these drugs are moved
`into the clinical practice setting.
`
`I
`
`Introduction
`
`Rudolph Vircltow may have been one ol‘ the first physi—
`cians in modern times to observe the link between the
`
`imtnunc systetn and malignancy in what he termed “lyin—
`phoreticular intiltrates". 'l'hesc intiltrates were leukocytes
`surrounding malignant
`tumors. and he hypothesized that
`proinllannnatory states might
`induce normal
`tissues to
`
`become malignant [I I. Since then. we have learned a great
`deal about how the immune system responds and reacts to
`tumors. which tumor—specific antigens are recognized as
`foreign. and how immtlne responses can be manipulated
`and harnessed to enhance tumor cell killing.
`
`A Adis
`
`

`

`K. Shill el al.
`| 904
`
`
`Recently. it has been recognized that. on its own. tumor
`peptide presentation by major histocompatibility complex
`tMl-K‘)
`to 'l‘—ccll
`receptors is
`inadequate for successful
`'l‘-cell activation and immune destruction ot‘ cancer cells.
`
`(To-regulatory signals. eitlter inhibitory or stimulatory. are
`also required 12. 3t. T cells play a critical role in cell—
`mediated tutnor itntnunity. and do so through an intricate
`counterbalance ot‘ co—stintulatory and co—inltihitory cell—to-
`celi signals between various components of the immune
`systettt.
`'l‘his systetn of checks and balances is necessary
`ttot only to allow a powerl’ul destructive response against
`both pathogens attd tnalignancies.
`l'ItIl also to prevent
`immune responses from heittg generated against normal
`tissues.
`(.‘t'itical
`‘chcckpoints' control and line-tune the
`immune system through regulation ol' this complex net-
`work ol‘ co—stimulatory and ctr-inhibitory signaling 13}.
`in
`this paper. we review some. of the important
`immune
`checkpoint molecules elucidated to date. as well as el'l'orls
`to block these molecules in order to shift
`the balance
`
`towards antitumor immunity. We also describe some of the
`
`and challenges encountered using these
`complexities
`checkpoint inhibitors in the clinic.
`
`2 Cytotoxic 'I‘-Ivymphoeyte-Associated Antigen
`(C’l‘LAl-4
`
`ll Background
`
`More than 40 years of research has led to the development
`ot‘ a two—signal
`theory ol'
`'l‘—cell activation: antigenic
`stimulation of the 'l'—cell receptor t'l'(‘R) [signal I) together
`with eo-slimulation by other molecules on the cell surl‘ace
`(signal 2) f2. KI. One of the key co~sti|tttllatory mechanisms
`involves tlte interaction ol‘ (1)28 on the surl'ace ol‘ tire T
`
`cell with B? molecules (‘on or €on on antigen—pre—
`senting cells. ("FLA—4. a transmemln'ane glycoprotein with
`considerable homology to CUES. binds to the same l5?
`ligands. as such (Fig.
`it. Upon 'l‘f‘R stimulation by anti-
`gens. T cells express ("FLA—4. which can hittd B7 mole—
`cules: however, unlike (”028.
`(TIA—4 inhibits 'l‘—cc|!
`
`l'or ntaintenance of immune
`important
`responses artd is
`tolerance. Expression ol'
`("FLA—'4 raises the activation
`
`threshold and attenuates clonal expansion: thus. a produc-
`tive. T—cell response ensues only upon a net co—stintttlatory
`signal.
`
`2.2 Hl‘tieacy ol‘ ("FLA—4 inhibitors
`
`2.2.! i‘pit't'initnmb
`
`tpilimumab. one ot‘ the. best—studied monoclonal antibodies
`targeting (."['l.A—4 [table 1
`I4-- top. has been evaluated in
`
`A Adis
`
`Antigen presenting cellt'Tumor
`
`T cell
`
`MHC class I or ll-
`
`GAL9
`
`enso orcnae --q—o'
`\
`
`CD80 or CDSB
`
`F‘D-L‘l or PD-L2
`
`'l‘-ccll activation and immune checkpoint pathways. ‘l'-ce|l
`l
`Fig.
`activation requires tvro signals: tl} presentation ol‘ antigenic peptides
`by MlIC to the TCR and IE: co-stimttlalion. typically via (‘DZKzt'Ufiti
`or ('ozsi‘nse ligation.
`Immune checkpoint pathways comprising
`receptors on T cells and ligands on antigen-presenting cells andi’or
`tumors line—lune immune responses via 'l'—cell activation or inhibition.
`("Fiat-4 cytotoxic 'l‘-lymphocyle—associaletl antigen 4. (MM) galec—
`tin-9. (EH'R glueocorticoid-induccd 'I‘Nl" receptor—related gene. (HT-
`Rl’. gILlcoc:irlicoid—induced 'I‘Nl" receptor-related gene ligand. L-lU-J’
`lymphocyte activation gene-3. MHE.‘ major histoeompatihilily cont—
`ples. PD-i programmed death— I. Pill—{.1 programmed death ligand |.
`{JD-LE programmed death ligand 3. KW 'l‘-cell receptor. 'f'iMa'
`'I'-eell
`immtmoglobulin and ntucin domain 3. TN!" tttlnor necrosis lactor
`
`a clinical trial program of more than 2,000 patients with a
`variety ot‘ solid tumors I4. 5.
`li—l‘Jl.
`lpilimumab (Yer-
`voym J. administered every 3 weeks for four doses. gained
`US FDA approval in 20! | for the treatment ot‘ unreseclable
`or ittetastatic melanoma. based on data from two phase [I]
`randomized trials showing improvement on ntcdian overall
`survival (03) over control arms in patients with melanoma
`
`triais evaluated
`E4. 5. 2(}|. One of the pivotal phase [ll
`ipilitnumab with or without gpitlt] vaccine in previously
`treated patients with advanced melanotna. Although the
`best overall response rates were modest.
`lt).9 '95
`in the i—
`pilittttunab—alone group and 5.? ‘3'?- in the ipilimumah plus
`gplttt) vaccine group. some patients in both groups main—
`tained an objective response For at least ’2 years I4I. In this
`trial. the 3-year OS rate for ipilimumab tnonotherapy was
`20 "it.
`l4]. which cotnpares t‘avorahly with the 3—year ()3
`rate of 13'
`‘Zr. for historical control patients receiving stati—
`dard of care chemotherapy in a separate clinical trial |2t|
`['l'able 2 I4. 5. 7.
`l8.
`l9. 2 | —33l}. The other pivotal phase.
`[ll
`trial was conducted in treatment-naive patients with
`metastatic melanoma
`and compared ipilintuntah pltts
`dacarbazine versus dacarbazine plus placebo [5|. Although
`the dose and schedule Were slightly different.
`the rate ol‘
`best overall
`response was 15 ‘ii
`in the ipilintuntah plus
`dacarhaxinc group versus It) ‘J’r- for the dacarhazine plus
`
`

`

`Immune (‘heckpoinl Inhibitors in Cancer
`
`I‘mfi
`
`Table l
`
`
`Immune checkpoinl inhilnlors in clinical decelopnwnt l-l—lhl
`
`
`
` Name (‘umpany Description of agent
`
`
`
`lpil'nnumah I4. 5|
`‘l'retnelil‘mlnmh |o|
`Peml‘nmtizumah (M K3415} I'll
`Ni\-'olumah {EMS—(136658] |H|
`l‘itlilimmah [CT-{ll I: I‘ll]
`AMP-224 |l[ll
`I'VII’IMJZBUA lll. l3]
`BMS-‘BnSSU llfil
`MliDHT-lo II-ll
`lMl’32] ||5|
`TRXSIX ||6|
`
`lluman lgUl mAh against ("ILA-4
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`l-lunlan lg(i3 mAh againsl ("HA-4
`Med]mnumelAslraZencca
`Ilnnlanixed lg(i—l tnAh against I’D-l
`Merek
`Human IgCE-l mA‘n againsl I’D—l
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`l-lunlanired lgUl mAh againsl PD-l
`(‘ure'l'eelt
`|’I)-l.3-lg(i I‘UCtll'Ill'lll'lillll
`l'usion prolcin
`Amplimmune'. (llamSmilhKlinc
`lluman lg(i mAlu agaiusl I’D-H
`(ienenleeln’Roclte
`Human lgG-J nmh aga'tnsl I’ll—Ll
`BrisIoI-Myers Squibb
`Human nmh againsl l’l)—l.|
`MedlmmanefAsIraZeneca
`Soluble LAG-3 lg I'usion protein and MIIC' elass‘ || agonisl
`lmmulep
`
`GITR. Inc llumanized mAh against (il‘l‘R
`
`immu—
`.u'gt’;
`(‘HAA-J cytotoxic ‘[‘-l5mphoeyte-assnc'talcd anligen 4. (EUR gluesJeorlicoid-indueed Imnur necrosis factor receplolwrelaled gene.
`noglohulin (F. Uta-fl lymphocyle aelivalion gene-3. mx‘th momelonal antibody, MHC major hisloconunuihilit)‘ complex. I’D-I programmed
`death I. I’D-H programmed death ligand l. Hit-L3 programmed death ligand 2
`
`Table 2 Preliminary el'licacy data will] immune checkpoint
`El 33]
`
`l‘nead—lo-ltead: Irials" l4. 5. 7. 17.
`inhihilors or controls from individual tnut
`
`
`IX.
`
`Median 08
`Survival rale
`Rel'erencetst
`Athaneed tumor setting
`Agent or cnnlrnl
`Median l’l-‘S
`__—_.————-—-—-——-—-—————
`
`Melanoma
`
`(‘TX (("l‘X-mn‘ve pls}
`
`ND
`
`l).l—lt).? months
`
`lpilinnunah
`'I'remelimumah
`
`Pemhrolizulnah
`Nivolunlal‘n
`
`l’itlilimmah
`
`Nimlumah plus ipilimunlah
`
`2}) monlhs
`NI.)
`
`5.5 monlhs
`3.? months
`
`1.9 munlhs
`
`37 weeks
`
`HM monlhs
`12.6 months
`NR
`17.3 months
`
`NI)
`4“ months
`
`NSCIL‘
`
`("I‘X [(“l‘X-nai've pls]:
`
`4.3 monlhs
`
`3.3 months
`
`l’elnl'nmlimmab
`
`Ill—3'." necks"
`
`SI neeks
`
`|-_\‘ear: if) fit
`3-year:
`l2—l7 9?
`Buyeur: 220 ‘5'}
`J‘s-ear: 2! ‘3’}
`1-year:
`(3‘) Eli
`1—year: ()3 fit
`fi—year: 4|
`‘St
`1-year: (15 ‘9?
`1-year: 35 ‘9}
`2-year: 7‘) ‘9?
`|-_\rear: 3‘) {'1'
`2-year:
`l8 9.5
`NI)
`
`Niwnlumuh ipreviously-lI’ealcd pts:
`
`2.3 months
`
`9.9! nlonlhs
`
`1-year: 43 {it
`3-year: 34 G?
`1-year: 19 ("Ir
`3-year: t 25 “.4
`25-year: k 35 ‘9}
`l-year: 4t} ‘3?
`_ year
`IS "t
`1-year: 4T ‘3:
`| Ll Inunlhs
`4.“ months
`lpilimnmah
`
`
`IS. 21]
`
`H]
`I2”
`|7|
`IZZ
`
`IE}!
`IE—H
`
`113]
`
`|25--27l
`
`|28|
`
`|2*J|
`|3tl- HI
`[331
`Hill
`
`||?|
`
`R(‘{"
`
`(‘RPC
`
`Nix-'oltnnah [(‘TX-na'l're plst
`Soral'enih
`l‘vl'n-‘olumal:l
`
`Placebo
`
`3o.l weeks
`3.6—5.7 months
`3.1—4.2" months
`
`1| nlnnllts
`
`NR
`l I.(l- 10.2 months
`”.2443“ months
`Ill.” mnnllts
`
`('Ri’t‘.‘ eastration—resistant ln'oslale cancer. (TX chemotherapy. ND no data. NR nnl reached. N.S'('I.(' non small-cell
`survival. I’I'ZS' progressiondl‘ree survival. prs pallenls. Rt‘t’ renal cell carcinoma
`"
`lmporlanl: data an: not from head-lo-head Irials. and the II'ials dil't'cr It}; patienl characteristics. paliem numhcrs. and length nl' follow-up.
`lhcrel'ore direct comparisons across Irials and agenls have limited validilyz trials in tumor Iypes wilh l’l"S and ()3 data were included
`" Based on differing studies and dalal-cnls
`‘ hose-tlepemlcnl
`
`lung cancer. 05' overall
`
`L\ Adis
`
`

`

`K. Sliili et al.
`l‘J‘Jo
`—___—___—————_——-———
`
`placebo group. while lltc median dttration ol‘ response was
`19.3 versus til months for the dacarbaaine plus placebo
`group. Responses lasting at least 2 years were observed in
`both treatment groups. The 3—year survival rate with ipi—
`litntunab plus dacarbaxine was significantly higher than
`dacarbazine plus placebo: 20.8 versus IEQ ‘9’? ti" 6 l).(l[l| l.
`lpilimumab was evaluated as adiuvant therapy INIou-ing
`complete resection of stage Ill melanoma ill a phase III
`trial
`in patients at high risk ol' recurrence I34]. Patients
`receiving ipilimtttnab had a signilicantly increased median
`US as compared with patients receiving placebo: lot
`versus Ill months {P _' (liltilil.
`'l'he 3~ycar
`rates ol‘
`recurrence—tree survival were 47 9:
`for
`ipilimumab and
`35 ‘Ii- for placebo.
`chemotherapy can
`that
`suggest
`Preclinical
`studies
`indttce the release ol‘ tumor—specific antigens. thereby ini—
`tiating 'l'—cell activation and sensitizing tumor cells to
`’l‘—cell—tnediated killing I35l. These observations provided
`the rationale t'or combining inmmnotlterapy with cytotoxic
`agents to improve responses in patients with melanoma.
`and also led to the initiation of clinical
`trials evaluating
`
`ipilimumab with chemotherapy in lung cancer. A phase II.
`randomized study provided evidence that sequential
`ipi—
`Iiinumab is more effective than concurrent
`ipilitnumab
`when administered with paelitaxeltearbtiplatin in chemo—
`therapy—naive stage. [“8er patients with non—small-cell
`lttng cancer INSCII). The median 08 with sequential
`i—
`pilimumab. concurrent
`ipilimumab. and the control
`regi—
`men was IZQ. 9.7. and 8.3 months. respectively.
`In this
`trial. patients with squamous histology exhibited better
`outcomes [median immune-related progression-tree sur—
`vival
`|irPliSl and US) with sequential
`ipilimumah dosing
`than did patients with non-squamous histology list. Based
`on these findings. a phase III trial evaluating ()S in patients
`with squamous NSCLC.‘ receiving sequential
`ipilimumab
`alter chemotherapy was initiated [Table 3 | loll.
`lpilitnumah is also being investigated in the setting of
`metastatic castration—resistant prostate cancer ('m('RP('}. in a
`
`phase lll trial ot' ipilimumab versus placebo in post—docetasel
`patients with mC‘RPC receiving a single dose of radiother—
`apy, the primary endpoint of ()5 was not reached: hoWever.
`pre-spccilied subset analyses suggested that ipilitntttnab may
`he more active in patients with favorable prognostic l'actors.
`including no visceral disease. alkaline phosphatase (11.5
`upper
`limit ol' normal. and hemoglobin :ll gi’dl.
`ll7l.
`Rcsults from this study support
`the investigation ol‘
`ipi-
`limumab in the ongoing phase it]. (.‘Alti—l—U95 study among
`chemotlierapy—naive patients with m(‘Rl’(’ t'l‘able 3 [top
`
`2.2.2 7i‘t'mct't'mttmrth
`
`Tremelimtmiab is a hilly human immunoglobulin (E tlg(.it-
`2 monoclonal antibody targeting ("ILA—4 Iol t'l'able I H
`
`A Adis
`
`loll. 'l'rcmelimunuib provided durable responses in (if) "/0
`ol' patients in a phase [[
`trial of patients with advanced
`melanoma. as compared with the objective response rates
`(ORRsl of 5.7 and 10.9 ‘24 seen in the phase Ill
`trial ot'
`
`ipilinttttnab with or without vaccine I4. bl. However. the
`phase.
`[ll
`trial of tremelinmmab monotherapy failed to
`demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage
`over chemotherapy in lirst~1inc treatment ot~ patients with
`metastatic melanoma till ]. Patient selection criteria. dosing
`
`regimen. anti use of ipilimumab as salvage therapy for
`patients in the control arm were potential reasons for the
`lack of survival benetit.
`
`'l‘remelimumab showed evidence of activity against
`
`previously treated malignant mesothelioma in a small
`tN : 29} phase It single—arm trial l36|.
`l't‘out’ patients had
`partial
`responses. and It patients had stable disease at
`median duration 7.? months {range 2.(i—|6.6+l. with a
`median ()8 til I 1.3 months. Based on these results. a phase
`
`trial of tremelimumab in malignant mesothelioma has
`II
`been initiated t'l'able J | loll.
`
`2.3 Sat'ety ol‘ (TIA—4 Inhibitors
`
`The cumulative safety data across many trials show that
`agents that inhibit ("FLA-4 are generally safe. with unique.
`but usually manageable. side el’t‘ects that are linked to their
`tnechanistn ol' stimulating immune responses. Multiple
`phase It and III
`trials have characterized these immune-
`related adverse events tit'Al‘Ls) of CTLA-4 inhibition.
`()verall.
`irAlis vvere observed in SSw-(fl ‘70 of patients
`
`treated with ipilimumab. with 5—26 % of patients experi—
`encing grade 3:4 irAEs I4. [7. 3?] {Table 414.18, l2—l4.
`ii. 2t. 2.3. 2b. 28. 3h. 38-401).
`In the phase III
`trial
`investigating ipilimumab treatment with or without vac—
`cine. skin—related irALis (including pruritus. rash. and ery—
`themal and gastrointestinal
`irAlis (including diarrhea and
`colitis} were the tnost common. occurring in 29—44 9t.- ot‘
`patients; endocrine disorders were reported in 4—8 9?: ot‘
`patients Hf. Some of the more rare adverse events (Alisl
`
`reported during treatment with ipi—
`for each)
`til'l Ci
`litmtmah include uveitis. conjunctivitis. and neuropathy
`[37].
`Interestingly. when ipilimumah was given with
`dacarbarine.
`immune-mediated grade 314 hepatitis occur—
`red in 32 Ut- of patients. while the rates of gastrointestinal
`events. such as coiitis. were lower titan expected based on
`previous trials I5I. As adjuvant therapy. ipilimttmah had a
`sal'ety prolile generally consistent with that seen in patients
`with advanced melanoma. although the incidence ot‘ some
`irAlis
`leg. endoerinopathiesl was higher. Also.
`live
`patients (I 9t ] in the ipilimumab artn died due to treatment-
`related Alis versus {1 patients in the placebo group [34L
`'l'remelimumab has a similar irAli profile to ipilimumab.
`The most
`common
`irAlis with
`tremelimumab were
`
`

`

`.u
`
`| 5“}?
`
`mO”.Cuccsuom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`qum:fi.9...m03.....EF.2.3HEwE..EuumUJUmZ3983.3.Eutaflri9min:.295323....+Luca—ash:T.5.5.95.5...mcanmmCm.mn—m.mOpinnacuvm33.9:25.1...E3135...hgamma...ka
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9x.m_m_.....UZmaizfinewm0“LESTE.33...H5mEGmco$55.2:3.266....._c0359335..24...,aim....n.LnE:E..E.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xcEmgarUz._.=...«...m.:n:3maxREEF.2.3H.2m:..cm:05......25:29:..2van...itimi:.95323.3c.5535:n...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m...“an..-u.um§§.uE.mEEE3.4.3:;E576.mO“.Cmccouum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.00but:..n>..r=.u
`
`
`
`
`
`£3.43:kaSamBOEIH50m0”banana2...;HEm::.:b...~.32.5.6...3.3.5::.m......c..5..n..:52.3.5.1:.3LmEEEE.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fimlflfihuz«Eu9:v.3.51....7.oE..-uu:ut:uom”DEE...—ECm...H.2m:__.:....u~.52.2.23..5.c:.ems:42...;wi:—ficc.5m_....inah—4E2?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21.3.:be9.53.2;m3...62:752....2.3.5..$8.3m”baa—tn—...EH.:m:..5m...O.35...3.2.9.9...£3223...pizzemci:b.3529...F5.25::
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9:...downwamsaEu...5.2...:Min.wtwwcouum
`
`
`
`
`
`..__...2...>.....ncoE.5:-.._c:E3323;0.
`
`
`
`.53....,..._...._...£.
`
`
`
`
`
`m:_n55.2.6.16.5.961:59....(mmytgcgom
`
`
`
`£3.53:3.35....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.._xn,...:_:_..b2mamExam...“:2.m03.35.55::H.....9...:ch.355225......267.232..:32.......1...LE:::...a.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.m2.6on.98:5...M5.23955.2...25:3.0...3.2....5355.....EEEE...m53:52
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.3....bEEEBEEEM1.59.1.525.553.2:..3...35...;.5839....3...Ema...
`
`
`
`
`
`.imL4......__.=..___..r.__..m135
`
`FM.35....m5..—
`
`
`
`
`
`.5E3232;M.ct.m......_..uz.2553.57..m0”bursts.:5...H2..wizauuxUAUm351......»755mE3269.5+L_E__.E_.__....:
`
`
`.m.EzEfi...W.SanMOD.MmOm.mnE:.mO”53.56%$31.23.“.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.35:...07.Son.57..0...?“magiS...HSmango;2.0..qu.3»:z:LmEnEzfi.
`
`3:95.32.
`
`
`
`
`
`1T...1......EEE£5932...255:....32.3.5.33...._:1:...33.5%.mgr..szmmink.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mama._:....U./.23m2.3....mun.:EoEé”buzz...1....H.39.69.0nEcEfiE2.1.7595.:3.5.0.3023.+55:55:...—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HERREFUZc...“.2.m0“mantra.mm.HEchsz£5.16.on5.32.59.5.2...335.64.:J...»LnE:E...E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`...52.5.5.5.
`
`
`
`
`
`.50£memuo333.8%5...:.923331....35...2...ESEEEU:.En.o....c....2..u
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0:.“Own..mOQMUD.MMOQ.mnE.Cfixauum9:9:9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$3.3:thEcm$3.4...“.3mun...”tint“..I.Hz.3......qu9...2.75m£51.32:.0uEEEzEF.:.3BEE—.7.x...Liz—fizz...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.35....31.7.0...
`
`
`
`.35....9...?an
`
`
`
`
`
`.00cream.5......Ecuom.99ch15.33.2...Ln-.o.xn:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”30m....mO.mun.H2......9568m.325....aumwzaczkzfimw0.5...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|||II|J|I||||1III||
`
`£\ Adis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.00.ungi3.0....mmc.mnmn.”Cnuccgm350232...LnE...c..:+LnE:..:..E..1...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`| 998
`
`K. Shih cl ill.
`
`EaseE;
`
`EsEngta:BmEEm—9:6.HEEEEu
`
`
`
`:53ch$335
`
`25:3.9:
`
`doc.55.WEdun_.:%:8.Jm
`
`Vagoo5&3
`
`Ema—.7._ELK
`
`29“E:m0”.CmEE
`
`
`Sm:HSmcEEuum:ScmssE2529322...
`
`nmcmgzvhbz
`
`can5.2335m.,._...._?..m..E.mo5.55:“.
`
`
`
`53HEmirauum37593.0;:35:£32.35
`
`MODMED”ngogm
`
`nquFZFU.
`
`canEfimzumE:
`
`mo.95“turnta—
`
`::m.H:.mEomcoET:=EEEEEcounskufi
`
`a."dew_ELF.
`
`Ecmiii—.5”Hi.
`
`
`
`MOQ.mMO”ban—55m
`
`m0.mun—”fa—“E..—
`
`MEG“Cagauom
`
`€295LEESanEdie"..th
`
`
`
`:2fix.an..FUZ
`
`fl_WE;_2.07.
`
`
`
`1mm5..EHUZ
`
`cwmxmachuz
`
`is““.5553:2
`
`
`
`3.5ngSEE.Hing»;
`
`
`
`”ECwanuimauafimtmoyfi”.Cnncouum
`
`
`
`
`
`MUD.MmOm.mnE.mmnE.mO”.Cfiécoom
`
`
`
`Evin—:25.bénz
`
`iimzakbx
`
`2:“9.312m3.
`
`Emm3#:HUZ
`
`E:m.522.Hcm.52
`
`
`
`1—00MEL..xOD54.555
`
`mO”.CuEtm
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0;.mnEuvfiugdfi“.Cmvcoflm
`
`
`
`.93.:.m0mt..mnE”.CnE—ouom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`323%.:63732:5.95".Cwucouom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`53:52;3.9a.mk.mmo...c883m
`
`Emma
`
`In
`
`
`
`3.1.2332»:35333E:
`
`
`
`
`
`UJUmZ:uumania:23:22:
`
`
`
`:8macs—Sumac:33522.:
`
`
`
`335.5,;msnap.
`
`llu||||€llln§|||
`
`m5“22%ch.50umcomzom“biztm
`
`
`
`2;»H5mEEEuumE?»UJUmZ525:22.4
`
`:
`
`23m:3.MO:.95.:“bursts.
`
`
`
`
`EmcEfiuum59:5:290
`
`:
`
`EonLonzlcnnun.mmO339$:de”.taEmi
`
`
`
`5.:HE@5ch1.38839£5555E8335.64
`
`=
`
`5E.“Nas,8sz=3
`
`
`
`EEEwE3521....
`
`
`
`311.722:EEL352E:
`
`
`
`5...:UAUmz5355:3»:
`
`naEnwzofiEum
`
`naczwzoiEum
`
`33:5Esau
`
`nmEonz
`
`5.33MES
`
`c2553.?
`
`G3HEszEUuM237.32:.5oysfiuqucu
`
`22:25E.3£23353?qu
`
`:—
`
`fl—r—OEEDF:
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`.3LE:=~:En:B¢
`
`13:55:23?
`
`2:95:32
`
`0159...,“
`
`:C:
`
`7.53395.3QESETJEEE
`
`55215935
`
`??qu.355:32:32.2...
`
`i::::$.x.§....h
`
`:Eofifiamu—z
`
`
`
`”MK33%5....Ext._n.:__:._£:$l
`
`$25...man:—
`
`Tan—
`
`
`
`
`
`um;in...main;E3233...
`
`3.53
`
`3th
`
`
`
`531.3%...“HG—Esau.
`
`
`
`ugh.SEE.
`
`Umhfi.
`
`L\Ad
`
`
`
`52HEmcEEuumUAUmzusamfluEEatsuum
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`36:93am4..£353.12
`
`mEEtn—
`
`
`
`UJUwZ
`
`
`
`
`
`3.?H5$1,..szhouneasy—umcan“:b.5255
`
`E
`
`31338.3Lasagzz
`
`
`mo.5533%-UE”.EEE
`
`
`
`2.6“H59.5.3.0.5325.6:323.:32.52995
`
`:—
`
`3:63:.5£353.42
`
`
`
`

`

`lnmlunc (.‘hcckpuinl Inhibitor. in Cancer
`
`
`
`
`
`.50£535:E33:“:35
`
`
`
`”E.mmc...»...§:c.5w
`
`.400
`
`
`
`AGO...3._._an£
`
`
`
`
`
`3.3m.Mm—O.Mn—n—rtwficsuum:EccfioE51.52....ch5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m...m:m_o._b7..2350.9350m0r3553...:20HS5:553.u.__._5...¥.u..:.._533.......»._....:c_.6..n._:592:29.7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MGMini
`
`
`
`.mnEb.5959...“UUM
`
`
`
`
`
`$552...ar23a“...—moS.....E....n_.nnm.I.59.5:...qu..._.....fi.....E5“52:29.523:-2mE3E:ob.6.1.»99:35.22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”Emma50......going—5E
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0m.MCQ.MMO.mnE203::qubum:uuaau—u
`
`
`
`Chm—SNAFU?mamE:m0..h_.u._nm3.3._._n_5.3HEmCEPSeM9:5..meE—m“59.5.53..—:.5L:_::75_Z
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`«SmQHCFLZis...:5...min.”5.35:;52H.3mcEEUomany;3......5y..5...:........:55:323.:£2235»;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mmO.mui.xmu.MOD”.Cutccuum3.2.5.5..:3-..
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.9.5.2....UZtan23:25:3mo.mnE.......E....n_.2:HEmE..Eoum5::.52.5:57....45.5.:..E..u...m:_5:52:17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MMCh.9595..er5:25.5333:
`
`| 999
`
`
`
`nCL..:..._....m3w....
`
`
`
`.55...555%...2.35::........5:aumm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“coco—:35?ICHmum.z....5_5._.H.,.._.E__._mF...HEm:_._.:...um-33....=55...:+LEEfiEEm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$2.2...FUZ..._..m9.9.13.3553:...BEEFE..».._.__£z_..o.._5.5:;.nmH.25:553..35533%;...magi}.:5.43332...+€955:ch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5:...537.......§.:...,...§_..E3.55:5“.£5553....12:Uawn...2:...9.5.2.Enchant...._...._..32.;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xmommm5.522:“5.22:“m3.beam._>..a..:_.n_.2:HEmaiden”.25:35::2.2233:53:596...:5:52:32..-€535.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EENozFUZ...._:mEilcm.3.«mo3.55:::7“.HS@550233523....5355......5.75.5.5:.3:nE:E:E.+:=E_._5>2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mun—ucamac.mnE”Canccunm5:98—229:37.23....5Luau—.559.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2..m.55......
`
`5:55:32.
`
`
`
`an::251E325:35:..2235.55::.55....qu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.m......._.U./..can5.22%2.2.4mo.MMO...,.....E:m5......HS@555E?»ageing.535.6...E.55539.83:.1.»€9.23?.BEEEE3.0...—.mun—“9.258%:EEEE.r...a.5.2.»..on3::2.95::9.Eu5._........._EE...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VENEEHUZman52......5m5mmorang...5:.H2.55:...quu_:_.....u.,....:.:1335:...$323.55gingham:.522:35.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`31.5....57.:3“:.._...m_:m32mun—“...EEE5m.H.29:9ch=3-...2...25:122.:5355.54.:€535.17.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`400gum—EEELLsEEE._.E
`
`com
`
`.550
`
`
`
`m0.me.mnE”.Csnccuum.3LEEEEE+LEE:.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.0.mmn—”CancouumuEEnzmécn—Eumu+
`
`
`
`fl Adis
`
`
`
`1.22.5.3.stuEEcEEuz
`
`9.552693
`
`
`
`:.3.55.8...:...._:u.......v..n__
`
`
`
`55:823.55
`
`
`
`
`
`3.0.».NEO.muEreinccuum2:55.355:22.32....5.i€52»;.n:+LnEBc.:
`
`
`
`
`
`35.2.5.5m~33.
`
`
`
`

`

`EUUI)
`
`K. Shih el :ll.
`
`vi539.
`
`
`
`
`
`.muE.mOQ.sz..,.E_Es......m9sz357.32:
`
`fiufifchuzman.32mMO”bangin—5:H5mcEnbom53945.452:523.mzon.:.fln_:«ucxmqun—Hz
`
`
`
`Mm.mO.HCL.ran—4:38.,“
`
`...:..;.M30?:4..
`
`r555m..:._l_
`
`_._.n_.u_
`
`
`
`
`
`ashtfipruz:3“:3.MO65.7..”GEEK.5...HEszauum7.2.DsSE._B.5tumgflum:”EEQEEE+LSEESGE
`
`
`
`
`
`|||ulll||lll|l|||||llll|||l|
`
`llll|ll|l|ll|l|ll|||l||||||rt|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.EEEuEES.352C25573237.n—.;.:__amc:u_8_::UEma;3E."SE“;2253:.EE.CHE.
`
`33..2233—5525:3.3:BEE51.05%.52532...
`
`
`
`
`
`3...:SEE.
`
`UflflcflflhcuM¢_£3H.
`
`A Adis
`
`
`
`
`
`258$;kaSCH5.23:.“.52m0“.I.._:E_._n_53w.H5mzfiauumUHumZ£22mBE.5$255.64.:_uz§uuou.54.3mnm4cm;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.533.mnE.mO33:5..qu2::_:::_EEhuts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mO.mnE.MODӣ59593.p.752.953133:
`
`
`
`
`
`..400
`
`
`
`
`
`323“:pr2:“.3?macinfirm5.3mHEmafiauum.613:36...3..2:...an:{gnaw—CE).
`
`In—43....de
`
`
`
`
`
`RacauctzE...“:2moTSEE5%us3.228”.38.23.21.32:.62052}.E35:82...,..,«23.49%».
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mnE.MO..:u._um2:24:33.3::_5352;Luca
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nwnwxicfiuzcam.32WE”infirmSEHEmcEEuum.2.5212.55::.,._V.:o_.ru._m:S«Swain—LE
`
`
`
`
`.mG.MCD.mO.mun—h....Cnu=:uumbum$3232:.5“43:351..9...LsEiSFS;+zucmnmAn—mfi
`
`
`
`
`.vE£5255.
`
`..mOQ
`
`ZED
`
`
`
`
`
`mnexfiznchbzcan:SESM52”ED“bu—ct;5.3.H5mcEEuum332:2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket