throbber
Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
`
`Food Microbiology
`
`j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / f m
`
`Utilization of galactooligosaccharides by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis
`isolates
`Daniel Garrido a,d, Santiago Ruiz-Moyano a,d, Rogelio Jimenez-Espinoza c, Hyun-Ju Eom b,d,
`David E. Block b,c, David A. Mills a,b,d, *
`a Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
`b Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
`c Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
`d Foods for Health Institute, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
`
`a r t i c l e i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 19 September 2012
`Received in revised form
`5 October 2012
`Accepted 5 October 2012
`Available online 22 October 2012
`
`Keywords:
`Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis
`Prebiotics
`Galactooligosaccharides
`b-Galactosidase
`
`Prebiotics are non-digestible substrates that stimulate the growth of beneficial microbial populations in
`the intestine, especially Bifidobacterium species. Among them, fructo- and galacto-oligosaccharides are
`commonly used in the food industry, especially as a supplement for infant formulas. Mechanistic details
`on the enrichment of bifidobacteria by these prebiotics are important to understand the effects of these
`dietary interventions. In this study the consumption of galactooligosaccharides was studied for 22
`isolates of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, one of the most representative species in the infant gut
`microbiota. In general all isolates showed a vigorous growth on these oligosaccharides, but consumption
`of larger galactooligosaccharides was variable. Bifidobacterium infantis ATCC 15697 has five genes
`encoding b-galactosidases, and three of them were induced during bacterial growth on commercial
`galactooligosaccharides. Recombinant b-galactosidases from B. infantis ATCC 15697 displayed different
`preferences for b-galactosides such as 40 and 60-galactobiose, and four b-galactosidases in this strain
`released monosaccharides from galactooligosaccharides. Finally, we determined the amounts of short
`chain fatty acids produced by strain ATCC 15697 after growth on different prebiotics. We observed that
`biomass and product yields of substrate were higher for lactose and galactooligosaccharides, but the
`amount of acids produced per cell was larger after growth on human milk oligosaccharides. These results
`provide a molecular basis for galactooligosaccharide consumption in B. infantis, and also represent
`evidence for physiological differences in the metabolism of prebiotics that might have a differential
`impact on the host.
`
`Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The Bifidobacterium genus is composed of Gram-positive strictly
`anaerobic rods, which are common inhabitants of the intestinal
`tract of humans (Lee and O’Sullivan, 2010). They are dominant in
`the infant gut microbiota, especially in breast-fed infants
`(Yatsunenko et al., 2012), where they can represent up to the 90% of
`the total bacteria in this environment (Boesten et al., 2011).
`
`Abbreviations: GOS, galactooligosaccharides; HMO, human milk oligosaccha-
`rides; FOS, fructooligosaccharides; LNT, lacto-N-tetraose; SCFA, short chain fatty
`acids.
`* Corresponding author. Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of
`California Davis, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA. Tel.: þ1 530 754 7821;
`fax: þ1 530 752 0382.
`E-mail address: damills@ucdavis.edu (D.A. Mills).
`
`0740-0020/$ e see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.003
`
`Bifidobacteria still represent a significant proportion of the adult
`gut microbiota (Eckburg et al., 2005), however different species can
`be found in both environments (Mangin et al., 2006; Roger et al.,
`2010).
`Bifidobacteria show remarkable adaptations to use and metab-
`olize complex oligosaccharides as a carbon and energy source (Lee
`and O’Sullivan, 2010). In breast-fed infants, the main carbon sour-
`ces available for the developing intestinal microbiota are human
`milk oligosaccharides (HMO; (Kunz et al., 2000)) and certain bifi-
`dobacteria can gain access to N- and O-glycans in milk proteins or
`mucins (Garrido et al., 2012b; Ruas-Madiedo et al., 2008). Only
`a few bacterial species have been shown to use these substrates
`(Marcobal et al., 2010), and the molecular mechanisms involved in
`HMO consumption in bifidobacteria are beginning to be under-
`stood (Garrido et al., 2012a). In adults, diet delivers the intestinal
`microbiota a great variety of oligo- and polysaccharides, which are
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 1/9
`
`

`

`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`263
`
`resistant to enzymatic degradation in the intestinal lumen and
`therefore reach distal portions of the intestine. Different Bifido-
`bacterium species are capable of metabolizing complex oligosac-
`charides usually from plant origin such as cellodextrins and
`amyloses (Pokusaeva et al., 2011), raffinose (Dinoto et al., 2006),
`arabinooligosaccharides (Lagaert et al., 2010; Van Laere et al., 1997),
`xylooligosaccharides (Gilad et al., 2010), fructooligosaccharides and
`inulin (Omori et al., 2010; Perrin et al., 2001; Rossi et al., 2005),
`galactans and galactooligosaccharides (GOS; (Barboza et al., 2009;
`Goulas et al., 2009a; Hinz et al., 2005; O’Connell Motherway et al.,
`2011)) among several others.
`Several infant formulas are supplemented with FOS and GOS
`with the aim of replicating some of the beneficial effects of human
`milk, in special its bifidogenic effect (Bakker-Zierikzee et al., 2005;
`Brunser et al., 2006). GOS are synthetically produced by microbial
`b-galactosidases (Gosling et al., 2010), which under specific
`conditions can perform transglycosylation reactions with lactose as
`the starting material. These enzymes are widespread in bifidobac-
`teria, and some of them have remarkable yields in GOS synthesis
`(Hinz et al., 2004; Hung and Lee, 2002; Rabiu et al., 2001). GOS can
`have a degree of polymerization (DP) between 3 and 15 (Barboza
`et al., 2009) and are composed of galactose oligomers in b1-3/4/6
`linkages with a terminal glucose residue (Coulier et al., 2009;
`Gosling et al., 2010). These substrates have been extensively studied
`for their prebiotic status, promoting the growth of beneficial
`microorganisms such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (Andersen
`et al., 2011; Davis et al., 2011), therefore providing putative health
`benefits (Gibson et al., 2004). GOS structures resemble galactan
`chains found in plant oligosaccharides abundant in adult diets,
`which might explain how these microorganisms consume GOS.
`The mechanisms by which infant bifidobacteria are enriched by
`these prebiotics probably include oligosaccharide transporters and
`b-galactosidases specific for these substrates. In Bifidobacterium
`longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697, two genes encoding solute-
`binding proteins (SBPs) from ABC transporters were specifically
`induced during growth on GOS (Garrido et al., 2011). b-galactosi-
`dases are widespread enzymes in bifidobacteria, and they display
`diverse substrate specificities (Goulas et al., 2009b). Two b-galac-
`tosidases in Bifidobacterium infantis HL96 have been previously
`studied (Hung and Lee, 2002; Hung et al., 2001) regarding their
`transglycosylation properties, and recently two b-galactosidases in
`the strain ATCC 15697 were shown to be active on different linkages
`found in HMO (Yoshida et al., 2012), and their activity likely
`complements b-hexosaminidases in this bacterium (Garrido et al.,
`2012c). Of increasing interest are also the metabolites produced
`after bifidobacterial fermentation of sugars, especially short chain
`fatty acids (SCFA) such as acetate and lactate as they represent one
`of the main protective mechanisms of bifidobacteria for its host
`(Fukuda et al., 2011). In this study we have characterized the
`consumption of GOS in a panel of B. infantis isolates from infant
`feces, and we further investigated the mechanisms involved in GOS
`degradation and metabolism in the type strain ATCC 15697.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Microorganisms and media
`
`Strains used in this study (Supplementary Table 1), were ob-
`tained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA),
`and the University of California Davis Viticulture and Enology
`Culture Collection (Davis, CA). De Mann, Rogose and Sharp (MRS)
`broth supplemented with 0.05% w/v L-cysteine (SigmaeAldrich, St.
`Louis, MO) was used for routine growth of B.
`infantis under
`anaerobic conditions (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, MI) at
`37 C in an atmosphere consisting of 5% carbon dioxide, 5%
`
`hydrogen, and 90% nitrogen. Chemically competent Escherichia coli
`BL21 Star and Top10 cells were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad,
`CA), and transformants were cultured at 37 C in Luria Broth with
`50 mg/ml carbenicillin (Teknova, Hollister CA) when necessary.
`
`2.2. Consumption of GOS by B. infantis isolates
`
`Bifidobacterium isolates in Supplementary Table 1 were grown
`overnight in MRS and inoculated at 5% in modified MRS (mMRS),
`containing no carbon source, and supplemented with 0.05%
`cysteine (Sigma) and 0.5% commercial GOS (Purimune, GTC Nutri-
`tion, Golden, CO) or 0.5% lactose as a growth control. Growth was
`monitored using a PowerWave microplate spectrophotometer
`(BioTek Instruments, Winoosky, VT) at 37 C for 48 h, reading
`absorbance at 600 nm. Each experiment was done in triplicate, and
`controls with no carbon source and no bacteria were subtracted
`from growth values. Aliquots of the reactions (1 ml) were spotted in
`TLC Silica gel plates (Sigma). A mixture of n-propanol, acetic acid
`and water in a 2:1:1 ratio was used as solvent. Plates were dryed
`and sprayed with 0.5% a-naphthol and 5% H2SO4 in ethanol, and
`developed at 150 C for 10 min.
`
`2.3. Gene expression analysis
`
`For RNA extraction, B. infantis ATCC 15697 was grown on the
`chemically defined media Zhang-Block-Mills 1 (ZMB-1; (Zhang
`et al., 2009)) to which 2% w/v of glucose (Sigma), lactose (Sigma),
`GOS (GTC nutrition) or purified HMO (Ward et al., 2006) were
`added. Growth was monitored in a plate reader as described above.
`Cells at exponential phase were pelleted at 12,000  g for 2 min,
`resuspended in 1 ml of RNA later (Ambion, Austin, TX), stored at
`4 C overnight and then at 80 C until use. RNA extraction was
`performed using the RNAqueous Ambion kit (Ambion) and cDNA
`was obtained from 10 mg of RNA using the High Capacity cDNA
`Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). For the relative
`quantification of b-galactosidase and related genes, the Fast Sybr
`Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used,
`using the gene Blon_0393, cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase, as the
`endogenous control (Parche et al., 2006). Reaction conditions were
`as recommended by manufacturer. Primer efficiency was normal-
`ized in each plate using standard curves. The Primer3 software was
`used for primer design (Supplementary Table 2), and the Q-gene
`software was used for relative quantification analysis.
`
`2.4. b-galactosidase gene cloning
`
`B. infantis ATCC 15697 genomic DNA was obtained from over-
`night cultures on MRS, using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA
`Purification Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI), following
`the manufacturer instructions. Primers used for PCR cloning are
`shown in Supplementary Table 2. PCR reactions contained 0.2 mM
`dNTPs (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD), 1 ng DNA, 0.5 mM of each
`primer, and 2 U of Phusion DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Vantaa,
`Finland) in a 150 ml final volume. PCR was performed in a Verity 96
`well thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems), using the following
`program: initial denaturation at 98 C for 2 min; 35 cycles of
`denaturation at 98 C 30 s, annealing at 58 C for 30 s, and exten-
`sion at 72 C 3 min; and a final extension at 72 C for 7 min. PCR
`products were gel purified (Qiaquick Gel Extraction Kit, Qiagen,
`Valencia, CA) and cloned into pET101 using the Champion pET101
`Directional TOPO Expression Kit (Invitrogen), following manufac-
`turer instructions. Plasmids were transformed into BL21 star E. coli
`cells as well as Top10 cells for plasmid storage, and transformants
`were confirmed for the correct insert sequence by plasmid
`sequencing using primers T7prom and T7term (Invitrogen).
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 2/9
`
`

`

`264
`
`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`2.5. Recombinant protein expression and purification
`
`2.8. Evaluation of relative affinities of b-galactosidases
`
`E. coli BL21 transformants were grown in 200 ml LB broth with
`50 mg/ml carbenicillin in a shaker at 250 rpm (Innova-4000, New
`Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ) at 37 C until cultures reached an
`O.D. of 0.6. Recombinant proteins were induced for 6 h with the
`following optimized conditions: 0.5 mM IPTG (USB) at 24 C for
`Blon_0268 and Blon_2416; 0.5 mM IPTG at 28 C for Blon_2016;
`1 mM IPTG at 24 C (Blon_2123) and 0.5 mM IPTG at 28 C for
`Blon_2334. Cultures were centrifuged in 50 ml falcon tubes at
`4000 rpm in an Eppendorf 5804 centrifuge (Eppendorf,
`Hauppauge, NY) for 20 min at 4 C, and pellets were kept at 80 C
`until use. Cells were resuspended in Bugbuster Protein Extraction
`Reagent (EMD Chemicals), using 5 ml of the buffer for every 100 ml
`of culture. Lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich, 50 ml of 50 mg/ml stock), and
`DNAse I (Roche Applied Sciences; 20 ml of 10,000 U stock) were
`added to help in bacterial lysis. The suspensions were vortexed and
`incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and centrifuged for
`20 min at 13,200 rpm at 4 C. Supernatants were recovered and
`applied to 1 ml Bio-Scale Mini Profinity IMAC cartridges, connected
`to an EP-1 Econo-pump (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA). Protein purification
`was performed as recommended by the manufacturer, but proteins
`were eluted using an imidazole gradient between 20 and 250 mM
`in the washing buffer. Recombinant b-galactosidases were checked
`for purity and correct molecular weight using 10% SDS-PAGE gels
`(Bio-Rad). Elution buffer was exchanged for PBS using Amicon
`Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units, with a cut-off of 50 kDa (Milli-
`pore). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad
`protein assay, with a standard curve using Bovine Serum Albumin
`(Sigma).
`
`2.6. Determination of enzymatic kinetic parameters
`
`Enzymatic assays were carried out using ortho-nitrophenyl-b-
`galactoside (ONPG; Sigma) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml and 1e
`10 mg of each recombinant enzyme. Optimum pH for each
`enzyme was determined using McIlvaine buffers, with values from
`4.0 to 8.0. Reactions were performed in triplicate in 96 microwell
`plates, and contained 80 ml of each buffer, 15 ml of substrate, and 5 ml
`of enzyme. Reactions were incubated for 10 min at 37 C, and
`stopped adding equal volumes of 1 M Na2CO3. Absorbance at
`420 nm was determined using a Synergy 2 microplate reader
`(Biotek). For determination of optimum reaction temperatures,
`enzymatic assays were performed at optimum pH and at 4 C,
`30 C, 37 C, 45 C, 55 C and 65 C. Relative activity was deter-
`mined from OD420 values. Kinetic constants were obtained using
`substrate concentrations in the range of 0.1e4 mM of ONPG and 1e
`100 mg of each enzyme. Reactions were performed at optimum pH
`and temperature, and times were preestablished to fall within the
`initial rate of reaction. Amounts of o-nitrophenol produced in each
`reaction were calculated from a standard curve and OD420 values.
`Non-linear regression was used to determine Km and Vmax, fitting
`the experimental values to the Michaelis Menten equation, using
`the tool Solver on Microsoft Excel.
`
`2.7. b-galactosidase substrate specificity determination
`
`Recombinant enzymes were coincubated in phosphate buffer
`and 2 mg of the following substrates at their optimum pH and
`temperatures: D-lactose (Sigma), 30 galactosyl lactose (Carbosynth,
`Berkshire UK), Galb1-4Gal (40 galactobiose; V-labs, Covington, LA),
`Galb1-6Gal (60 galactobiose; V-labs), and 10 mg of commercial GOS
`(GTC Nutrition). Reactions were carried out in 10 ml for the specified
`times at 37 C, and inactivated at 95 C for 5 min. 1 ml of each
`reaction was analyzed in TLC plates as described above.
`
`Equimolar concentrations (0.2 mM) of ONPG (Sigma), lactose
`(Sigma), 40 galactobiose (V-labs), 60 galactobiose (V-labs), 30 galac-
`tosyl lactose (Carbosynth, UK) and lacto-N-tetraose (V-labs) were
`coincubated with the same amount (1e20 mg) of each of the five
`recombinant b-galactosidases for 10 min at
`their optimum
`temperatures and pH in McIlvaine buffer in a 10 ml volume. Reac-
`tions were inactivated by incubation at 95 C for 5 min. The
`Galactose Assay Kit (Biovision, Mountain View CA) was used to
`quantify galactose concentrations present
`in each sample,
`following the manufacturer instructions. Fluorescence was quan-
`tified using a standard curve in a Synergy 2 microplate reader.
`Values were normalized considering the amount of galactose
`released from ONPG as 100%.
`
`2.9. Production of SCFA by B. infantis ATCC 15697
`
`The production of acetate, lactate and formate by B. infantis was
`tested on seven different substrates: glucose (Sigma), lactose, HMO,
`LNT (V-labs), GOS, FOS (raftilose Synergy 1, Orafti, Malvern, PA) and
`inulin (raftiline HP, Orafti, Malvern, PA). B. infantis ATCC 15697 was
`grown overnight in MRS and inoculated at 5% in modified MRS,
`replacing sodium acetate by sodium chloride (10 g/l peptone, 5 g/l
`yeast extract, 5 g/l sodium chloride, 2 g/l ammonium citrate, 0.2 g/l
`magnesium sulfate, 0.05 g/l manganese sulfate, 2 g/l dipotassium
`phosphate, 1 g/l tween 80, and 0.05% cysteine). Media was sup-
`plemented with equal amounts (2% w/v) of each carbon source
`mentioned above. The incubations were carried out at 37 C in
`anaerobic chamber in triplicate (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass
`Lake, MI). After 48 h of incubation the final optical density was
`measured in a spectrophotometer at 600 nm ((Shimadzu Scientific
`Instruments, Columbia MD), and the media was recovered by
`centrifuging at 12,000  g for 10 min). Supernatants were analyzed
`using the L-lactate assay kit (Bioassay Systems, Hayward, CA),
`acetate assay kit (Bioassay Systems), and formate assay kit (Bio-
`vision, Milpitas, CA) according to the manufacturer instructions. For
`calculation of fermentation kinetic parameters, OD values were
`converted to dry weight in a ratio of 0.39 (Rossi et al., 2005), and
`these values were used with the amounts of SCFA in grams and
`initial concentration of each substrate (2 g/100 ml) to estimate the
`product yield of substrate (YP/S), the biomass yield of substrate (Yx/
`S) and the product yield of biomass (YP/x). Substrate consumption
`was assumed to be 100%.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Consumption of GOS by B. infantis isolates
`
`Twenty-two strains of B. infantis isolated from infant feces were
`studied in vitro for their ability to grow using 0.5% commercial GOS
`as the sole carbohydrate source. All isolates excepting SC97 showed
`a moderate to vigorous growth on GOS (Fig. 1). We also analyzed
`the supernatants of the fermentations in TLC plates (Fig. 2). All
`isolates were able to deplete the small amount of mono- and di-
`saccharides found in commercial GOS, and DP3 was also consumed
`to a great extent. In general, disappearance of individual GOS with
`DP >3 was correlated with a higher final OD600, and conversely
`lower growth on GOS was related to a lack of consumption of larger
`GOS. For example, strains SC30, SC145 and UCD302 displayed the
`higher OD values on GOS and a noticeable reduction in all DP
`compared to the control with no bacteria added (Fig. 2). These
`results indicate that consumption of larger DP GOS is strain-
`dependent.
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 3/9
`
`

`

`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`265
`
`Fig. 1. In vitro growth of strains of B. infantis using 0.5% commercial GOS as the sole media carbon source.
`
`3.2. Distribution of b-galactosidases in B. infantis
`
`To provide molecular details on the consumption of GOS in
`B. infantis, we focused on the genome of B. infantis ATCC 15697,
`which contains five genes predicted to encode b-galactosidases, EC
`3.2.1.23 (Table 1). Some of these genes are in the proximity of
`carbohydrate transporters (Supplementary Fig. 1), suggesting a co-
`regulated transcription. For example Blon_0268 and Blon_2334
`are located next to sugar permeases, and Blon_2416 is in a gene
`cluster containing an ABC transporter with affinity for oligosaccha-
`rides and a Glycosyl Hydrolase (GH) family 43. Blon_2334 is part of
`the HMO cluster I (Sela et al., 2008), which contains several genes
`predicted to be important in metabolism of HMO in this bacterium.
`These enzymes belong to either GH2 or GH42, as defined by the
`Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes database (www.cazy.org; (Cantarel
`et al., 2009)). The presence of these genes in some of the B. infantis
`isolates used in this study has been previously determined by
`comparative genome hybridization ((LoCascio et al., 2010);
`Supplementary Table 3). While Blon_2016, Blon_2123 and
`
`Blon_2334 were present in all the strains, Blon_0268 was only found
`in strain UCD301 and Blon_2416 was lacking in strains UCD298,
`UCD299 and UCD300, altogether with Blon_2414, an upstream gene
`encoding a SBP induced by GOS in strain ATCC 15697.
`
`3.3. Gene expression of b-galactosidases in B. infantis on GOS
`
`A relative quantification of the expression levels for each b-
`galactosidase gene was performed on B. infantis grown to expo-
`nential phase using lactose, glucose, GOS or HMO as the sole carbon
`source. Results were normalized to gene expression levels of cells
`growing on lactose (Fig. 3). We considered significant a level of
`induction more than two fold, as previously determined to be
`comparable to proteomic data (Garrido et al., 2011). Two genes,
`Blon_2123 and Blon_2416, were repressed at least four fold in cells
`grown on glucose. In contrast, Blon_0268 was induced eight fold
`during growth on glucose relative to lactose. When a pool of HMO
`was used as the sole carbon source, none of the enzymes was
`induced relative to lactose. However, Blon_2016 and Blon_2334 are
`
`Fig. 2. Analysis of the consumption of GOS by B. infantis isolates by TLC. Supernatants represent strains in Fig. 1, and a control prepared under the same conditions but with no
`bacteria added was included (GOS lane). Plates were run in n-butanol-acetic acid-water 2:1:1 and developed with a-naphthol. Numbers correspond to strains in Supplementary
`Table 1.
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 4/9
`
`

`

`266
`
`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`Table 1
`Enzyme kinetic parameters and optimums for B. infantis b-galactosidases.
`1)
`kcat (s
`
`Optimum
`pH
`5.0
`5.0
`5.0e6.0
`7.5
`5.0e6.5
`
`Optimum
`temperature
`45 Ce55 C
`45 C
`45 Ce55 C
`37 C
`45 C
`
`Blon_0268
`Blon_2016
`Blon_2123
`Blon_2334
`Blon_2416
`
`Km (mM)
`
`0.60
`0.70
`1.06
`0.29
`1.09
`
`5.11
`1365.58
`269.92
`420.04
`7.21
`
`kcat/Km
`1 M(s
`1)
`
`8.50  103
`1.94  106
`2.5  105
`1.47  106
`6.58  103
`
`3.5. Relative affinities and substrate specificity of B. infantis b-
`galactosidases
`
`We also studied the activity of these enzymes on common b-
`galactosides. 4- and 6-galactobiose (Galb1-4Gal and Galb1-6Gal)
`and galactosyl-lactose (Galb1-3Galb1-4Glc) are common products
`in transglycosylation reactions (Gosling et al., 2010). Moreover,
`plant polysaccharides also contain these linkages as building
`blocks. As observed on TLC plates and considering the relative
`affinities for these substrates (Table 2), Blon_0268 displayed an
`overall preference for 60 galactobiose (Fig. 4A, lanes 2e4; 9e11 and
`Fig. 4C, lane 3). Conversely, Blon_2416 showed a preference for 40
`galactobiose over galactosyl lactose (Fig. 4B lanes 6e7 and 13e14;
`Fig. 4C,
`lane 7). Blon_2123 was only partially active on
`60galactobiose.
`Blon_2334 showed higher lactase activity compared to the other
`B. infantis b-galactosidases (Fig. 4A, lanes 20e22). Blon_0268 and
`Blon_2016 showed only a minor activity on this substrate (Fig. 4A,
`lanes 17e19 and Table 2). Blon_2016 releases galactose very effi-
`ciently from type 1 HMO such as lacto-N-tetraose (LNT; Galb1-
`3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4Glc), and it had the highest enzymatic effi-
`ciency given by the kcat/Km ratio on ONPG (Table 1). The results
`presented in this study indicate that this enzyme can cleave other
`galactosyl linkages, such as those found in 40 and 60 galactobiose
`(Fig. 4C, lanes 2e3 and 8e9), 30 galactosyl lactose (Fig. 4C, lane 4),
`and GOS (Fig. 4D, lanes 4e5), displaying however a preference for
`LNT (Table 2).
`infantis b-galactosidases with
`Finally, after incubation of B.
`commercial GOS for 1 h, we observed that four of them displayed
`significant hydrolytic activity on these prebiotics, as observed by an
`increase in time in the amount of galactose and glucose released
`from commercial GOS (Fig. 4A, lanes 23e30 and Fig. 4D).
`
`3.6. Production of SCFA by B. infantis
`
`Sugar metabolism in bifidobacteria differs from other bacterial
`metabolic pathways (Fushinobu, 2010) and is characterized by the
`presence of fructose-6-P phosphoketolase, an enzyme that gener-
`ates acetyl-P and erythrose-4-P from fructose-6-P. This pathway,
`termed the “bifid shunt”, produces 2.5 mol of ATP per mole of
`glucose, as well as 3 mol of acetate and 2 mol of lactate that are
`
`constitutively expressed at high levels when B. infantis grows on
`HMO and lactose (Sela et al., 2008; Yoshida et al., 2012). Finally,
`growth on commercial GOS had the greatest impact on the tran-
`scription of B. infantis b-galactosidases, with Blon_2334 induced
`over tenfold and Blon_0268 and Blon_2416 also induced over two
`fold by these oligosaccharides.
`We also analyzed the expression levels for genes adjacent to
`Blon_0268 and Blon_2334 (Supplementary Fig. 2), encoding for
`transporters of the major facilitator superfamily. Even though the
`carbohydrate affinity of these transporters (Blon_0267, Blon_2331
`and Blon_2332) is unknown, their induction by GOS, as well as
`glucose (Blon_0268), is suggestive that their affinities are related to
`these substrates.
`
`3.4. Kinetic parameters of b-galactosidases in B. infantis
`
`In order to study some of the properties of these glycosyl
`hydrolases, they were cloned and expressed in E. coli, and purified
`with an N-terminal his-tag. ONPG was used for evaluating different
`kinetic parameters. Optimum pH values were relatively acidic for
`Blon_0268 and Blon_2016, and more neutral for the other three
`enzymes (Table 1). As observed with other b-galactosidases, the
`optimum temperature varied between 45 C and 55 C for all
`enzymes, except Blon_2334 which showed the highest activity at
`37 C. Using these conditions, kinetic parameters were determined
`using ONPG. Turnover rates were the highest for Blon_2016, and
`together with Blon_2334, these glycosidases showed the greatest
`1 M
`1. These
`kinetic efficiency given by a kcat/Km ratio over 1 106 s
`values are in agreement with those obtained by Yoshida et al.
`(2012), and they were 1000 times higher than the kinetic effi-
`ciencies observed for Blon_0268 and Blon_2416 on ONPG.
`
`Fig. 3. Relative quantification of the gene expression of B. infantis b-galactosidases after logarithmic growth on the substrates indicated in the x-axis. Dashed lines indicate a two-
`fold change in gene expression.
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 5/9
`
`

`

`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`267
`
`Table 2
`Relative affinities of B. infantis b-galactosidases for individual substrates. Results are
`expressed as a percentage normalized to the amount of galactose released from
`ONPG.
`
`produced, growth on HMO, under these conditions we observed
`the highest yield of product over biomass, which indicates that
`B. infantis produces more acetate and lactate per cell. Formate is
`another end product of bifidobacterial fermentation of carbohy-
`drates, and growth on inulin, FOS and glucose led to a significant
`production of this organic acid. Finally, the acetate:lactate ratio was
`determined for each substrate. Considering that the theoretical
`value in bifidobacteria is 1.5, we observed that growth on FOS and
`inulin, as well as HMO and LNT to a lesser extent, led to a consid-
`erable increase in this value.
`
`Blon_0268 Blon_2016 Blon_2123 Blon_2334 Blon_2416
`100
`100
`100
`100
`100
`ONPG
`78.9
`19.9
`128.1
`Lactose
`e
`e
`40 galactobiose
`9.6
`e267.6
`e
`e
`60 galactobiose 153.2
`60.3
`137.5
`e
`30Gal-lac
`18.7
`11.6
`e
`e
`LNT
`123.4
`14.5
`e
`e
`
`e
`
`e
`
`6.1
`
`either released to the media or used in de novo fatty acid synthesis
`(Sela et al., 2010). These yields are variable among different strains
`and growth conditions. Here, we determined the amounts and
`yields of SCFA produced by B. infantis ATCC 15697 after growth on
`different prebiotics including GOS as the sole carbon source.
`Supernatants reached exponential phase at similar times and were
`recovered at 48 h, where all cultures reached stationary phase. In
`order to compare production of SCFA across the different
`substrates, three kinetic yield coefficients were calculated (Table 3),
`estimating a 100% substrate consumption, which is supported by
`the efficient oligosaccharide consumption of GOS (Barboza et al.,
`2009), FOS and inulin (Perrin et al., 2001), and lactose, glucose,
`HMO and LNT (Asakuma et al., 2011; LoCascio et al., 2007; Sela
`et al., 2012) by B. infantis.
`We observed that the product and biomass yields of substrate
`were higher during growth on lactose, GOS and glucose (Table 3),
`indicating that under these conditions B. infantis produces biomass
`and acids more efficiently. Although less biomass and SCFA were
`
`4. Discussion
`
`GOS are important food supplements that, among other health
`benefits, stimulate the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the
`gastrointestinal tract. In this work we studied several aspects of the
`utilization of commercial prebiotic GOS by B. infantis, a represen-
`tative species of the developing infant gut microbiota. As a dietary
`substrate, GOS is not degraded by host intestinal enzymes.
`However, its relatively simple composition, consisting of repeats of
`b1-3/4/6 galactosyl
`linkages, allows several bacteria,
`including
`Bacteroides sp. and Clostridium sp. to degrade and consume GOS
`in vitro (Gibson et al., 2004). Surprisingly, GOS consumption in
`human volunteers resulted in significant and consistent enrich-
`ment of mainly one genus, Bifidobacterium, as shown recently
`(Davis et al., 2011). Several species of this genus have been shown to
`grow on these prebiotics as the sole media carbon source (Goulas
`et al., 2007; Hopkins et al., 1998; Van Laere et al., 2000), and for
`example it has been shown by MALDI-FT-ICR mass spectrometry
`
`Fig. 4. Determination of the substrate specificities of B. infantis b-galactosidases for different galactosyl linkages by TLC indicated in the bottom of the figure. (A) Coincubations of
`Blon_0268 and Blon_2334 for 5, 20 and 60 min with different b-galactosides. Lanes 1 and 8: standards; lanes 2e4: Blon_0268 with 4-galactobiose; lanes 5e7: Blon_2334 with 4-
`galactobiose, 5-20e60 min; lanes 9e11: Blon_0268 with 6-galactobiose; lanes 12e14: Blon_2334 with 6-galactobiose. Lane 15: Lactose and galactose; lane 16: glucose; lanes 17e19:
`Blon_0268 with lactose; lanes 20e22: Blon_2334 with lactose. Lane 23: Commercial GOS; lane 24: lactose and galactose; lanes 25e27: Blon_0268 with GOS; lanes 28e30:
`Blon_2334 with GOS. (B) Coincubations of Blon_2016, Blon_2123 and Blon_2416 with 40 or 60 galactobiose for 200 and 600. Lanes 1 and 8: galactose and 40 or 60 galactobiose
`standards; lanes 2e3: Blon_2016 on 4-galactobiose; lanes 4e5: Blon_2123 on 4-galactobiose; lanes 6e7: Blon_2416 on 4-galactobiose; lanes 9e10: Blon_2016 on 6-galactobiose;
`lanes 11e12: Blon_2123 on 6-galactobiose; lanes 13e14: Blon_2416 on 6-galactobiose. (C) Glycolytic activity on 30 galactosyl lactose. Enzymes were incubated with this substrate for
`600. Lane 1: 30 galactosyl lactose; lane 2: galactose and lactose; lane 3: Blon_0268; lane 4: Blon_2016; lane 5: Blon_2123; lane 6: Blon_2334; lane 7: Blon_2416. (D) Coincubations of
`Blon_2016, Blon_2123 and Blon_2416 with commercial GOS for 200 and 600. Lane 1: GOS; lane 2: lactose and galactose; lane 3: glucose; lanes 4e5: Blon_2016; lanes 6e7: Blon_2123;
`lanes 8e9: Blon_2416. Gal: galactose, Glc: glucose, Lac: lactose.
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2003 - 6/9
`
`

`

`268
`
`D. Garrido et al. / Food Microbiology 33 (2013) 262e270
`
`
`
`Kinetic parameters of B. infant

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket