throbber
IUCL WET ya (S1) $1-S156 (2007) :Vol. 37 : $1 - November2007
`
`=~
`
`Supplement
`
`=<
`
`P
`
`————
`
`wn ae y
`Major Breakthroughs
`eleTebreta Novarti
`Immuy o)Keyeats
`eBNES
`
`)
`
`_
`
`a.
`
`4 1
`
`'
`
`> — ;
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago
`PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2066
`
`

`

` al of
`
`nology
`
`Executive Committee
`
`Chairman: Rolf Zinkernagel
`Deputies: Marco Colonna, Takashi Saito
`Alain Fischer
`Michel Goldman
`David Gray
`Gtinter Hammerling
`Rikard Holmdahl
`Sirpa Jalkanen
`Foo Yoo Liew
`Bernard Malissen
`Alberto Mantovani
`Andrew McMichael
`Lorenzo Moretta
`Andreas Radbruch
`Paola Ricciardi-Castagnoli
`
`Editorial Board
`
`William Agace
`Cezmi Akdis
`Shizuo Akira
`Graham Anderson
`Michael Beaven
`Christian Bogdan
`Margaret Callan
`Xuetao Cao
`Marco Cassatella
`Antonio Celada
`John Chan
`Lucienne Chatenoud
`Andrea Cooper
`Pierre Coulie
`Gennaro De Libero
`James Di Santo
`Britta Engelhardt
`AnnaErdei
`Sidonia Fagarasan
`Carl Figdor
`Kate Fitzgerald
`Jules Hoffmann
`Kristin Hogquist
`Fang-Ping Huang
`Hans-Martin Jack
`George Kollias
`Peter Krammer
`Tomohiro Kurosaki
`
`Bruno Kyewski
`Agnes Lehuen
`Steven Ley
`Miguel Lopez-Botet
`Stephen Miller
`Paul Morgan
`Allan Mowat
`Kenneth Murphy
`Luigi Notarangelo
`Annette Oxenius
`Berent Prakken
`Hans-Reimer Rodewald
`Sergio Romagnani
`Pedro Romero
`David Sacks
`Elisabeth Suri-Payer
`Megan Sykes
`Toshiyuki Takai
`
`Masafumi Takiguchi
`Keiji Tanaka
`Margot Thome
`Giorgio Trinchieri
`John Trowsdale
`Anton van der Merwe
`David Woodland
`Maria Yazdanbakhsh
`Steven Ziegler
`
`Managing Editor
`Cate Livingstone
`
`Assistant Editor
`
`Delphine Goux
`
`Editorial Assistant
`
`Claire Reigate
`
`Administrator
`Sylvia Heider
`
`Editorial Office
`
`Phone: +49 6201-606 382
`Fax:
`+49 6201-606 172
`E-mail KJTED@wiley-veh.de
`
`Home Page
`hitps//www.eji-journal.eu
`
`Instructions to authors
`
`Please refer to the home page of
`the journal at
`the URL as given
`above,
`
`Publisher
`
`WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
`KGaA
`PO Box 101161
`D-69451 Weinheim, Germany
`
`Subscriptions
`for customers in Germany, Austrit
`and Switzerland
`WILEY-VCH,
`Customer Service
`PO Box 10 11 61,
`-69451 Weinheim, Germany
`Phone: +49 6201 606 400
`Fax:
`+49 6201 606 184
`E-mail: service@wiley-vch.de
`For customers in all other
`COUMETTES:
`John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.,
`Journals Administration
`Department
`| Oldlands Way, Bognor Regis,
`West Sussex
`land
`
`PO22 OSA, Eng
`Phone: +44 124:
`799 777
`
`Fax:
`441243 843 232
`E-mail: es-journals@wiley.co,uk
`
`Advertising
`Marion Schulz
`Phone: +49 6201 606 565
`
`Fax
`149 6201 606 550
`Eeamail: mschulz@wiley-veh.de
`
`Production
`Melanie Brunner-Straub
`Fax:
`£49 6201 606 202
`E-mail: mbrunner@ewiley-veh.de
`
`Copyright Permissions
`E-mail:
`rights@wiley-veh.de
`
`Official journal of
`
`2 1S European Federation of
`
`Immunological Societies
`
`\)WILEY-VCH
`
`Kuropean Journal of Immunology (SSN 0014-2980) is published monthly by
`Wiley-VCH, PO Box 1OLI61, D-69451 Weinheim, Germany. Air
`freight and
`mailing in the USA by Publications Expediting Ine, 200 Meacham Ave., Elmont,
`NY 11003, Periodicals postage paid at Jamaica NY LST. US POSTMASTER
`send address changes to European Journal of
`Immunology c/o, Wiley-VCH,
`HL River Street, Hoboken, NJO7030
`
`©) 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`Eur. J. Immunol. 2007.
`
`37: 53-4
`
`S3,
`
`Pati ce)el LM lltts lis)J
`
`m S1
`
`Editorial
`
`m SS
`
`Meet the authors
`
`Immunology
`Breakthroughs in Immunology
`
`m S9
`
`The macrophage: Past and present and future
`Siamon Gordon
`
`m S18
`
`Seeing is believing: A focus on the contribution of microscopic
`imaging to our understanding of immune system function
`Mare Bajénoff and Ronald N. Germain
`
`m S34
`
`Historical insights into cytokines
`Charles A. Dinarello
`
`m S46
`
`Lymphoid organogenesisin brief
`:
`.
`:
`"
`i
`eG
`r
`Mark F. R. Vondenhoff, Georg Kraal and Reina E. Mebius
`-
`
`m S53
`
`m S61
`
`m S71
`
`«es
`.
`2
`3
`Dendritic cells: Understanding immunogenicity
`Ralph M. Steinman
`
`How apoptosis got the immune system in shape
`Christine Feig and Marcus E. Peter
`
`:
`:
`DNA repair and the immunesystem:
`From V(D)J recombination to aging lymphocytes
`Paola Rivera-Munoz, Laurent Malivert, Sonia Derdouch, Chantal Azerrad,
`Vincent Abramowski, Patrick Revy and Jean-Pierre de Villartay
`
`m S83
`
`The T cell antigen receptor: “The Hunting of the Snark”
`Tak W. Mak
`
`m S94
`
`A history of AIDS: Looking back to see ahead
`Warner C. Greene
`
`representation
`picture is a
`This
`a represe
`ae
`This picture is
`of the Cernunnos god superim
`posed on a nucleus showing
`GIA repair fogl revealed’ by
`immunostaining, Cernunnos1s
`the namegiven to a DNA repair
`factor identified in 2001. This
`picture was designedby Patrick
`and Jean-Claude Revy and
`is provided by Jean-Pierre de
`Villartay.
`
`m $103Abrief history of CD8 T cells
`David Masopust, Vaiva Vezys, E. John Wherry and Rafi Ahmed
`
`m S111
`
`NKTcells: In the beginning...
`H. Robson MacDonald
`
`™ S116 Regulatory T cells - a brief history and perspective
`Shimon Sakaguchi, Kajsa Wing and Makoto Miyara
`
`© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`m S4
`
`Eur. J. Immunol.
`
`I:
`
`2007.
`
`7,37: S3-4
`3
`
`Fritz Melchers
`
`™ S134 From a Dream to Reality
`Klaus Rajewsky
`
`™ S138 From gene amplification to V(D)J recombinationand back:
`A personalaccountof myearly years in B cell biology
`Frederick W. Alt
`
`Novartis Essays ™ $125 Starting at the end
`
`© Source: PhotoDisc, Inc./Getty
`images
`
`™® S148 Prevention of cancer through immunization:
`Prospects and challenges for the 21*' century
`lan H. Frazer, Doug R. Lowy and John T. Schiller
`
`™ 5156
`
`Impressum
`
`The cover picture is a montage illustrating the key breakthroughs in immunology featured
`in this EJI supplemental issue. The montage depicts the two major themes: discovery and
`immunology. Discovery is symbolised by the hands of a researcher holding oneofthe Petri
`dishes. Immunological research is highlighted by the immunecell images (Tcells, Treg cells,
`DC, macrophagesetc.), immunostained or observed with an electronic microscope. We thank
`Ron Germain, Siamon Gordon, Reina Mebius, Shimon Sakaguchi and Ralph Steinman for
`kindly providing us with these images.
`
`Newfeature: EJI Podcast
`
`|
`
`Hear Ralph Steinmantalk about the discovery of dendritic cells, current developments in the field, science funding,
`translational research and more in EJI's first podcast. Visit www.eji-journal.eu to download the podcast whichwill be
`available early November.
`
`tly NOVARTIS
`
`© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Charles A. Dinarello
`
`Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37; $3445
`
`Breakthroughs in Immunology
`
`
`
`Historical insights into cytokines
`
`Charles A. Dinarello
`
`University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA
`
`Cytokines affect nearly every biological process; these include embryonic development,
`disease pathogenesis, non-specific response to infection, specific response to antigen,
`changes in cognitive functions and progression of the degenerative processes of aging.
`In addition, cytokines are part of stemcell differentiation, vaccineefficacy andallograft
`rejection. This short insight focuses on the milestones in cytokine biology and how the
`various and often contradictory activities of these small, non-structural proteins
`affected the fields of inflammation and immunology. Multiple biological properties or
`pleiotropism is the hallmark of a cytokine. Today, the term “cytokine” encompasses
`interferons, the interleukins, the chemokine family, mesenchymal growth factors, the
`tumor necrosis factor family and adipokines. As of this writing, 33 cytokines are called
`interleukins, but many are part of families of related but distinct gene products. There
`are certainly over 100 separate genes coding for cytokine-like activities, many with
`overlapping functions and manystill unexplored. Also discussed in this overview arethe
`failures and successes of cytokines as therapeutic targets. A recent advance in the field
`has been that of differential cytokine production, which can be used toclassify human
`disease as being “autoimmune”or“autoinflammatory” thus impacting on therapeutic
`interventions.
`
`Received 21/8/07
`Revised
`6/9/07
`Accepted 18/9/07
`
`[DOI 10,1002/eji.200737772|
`
`™ Key words:
`Autoimmune - Host
`response- Infection
`- Inflammation
`- Leukocytes
`
`Introduction
`
`Cytokines can be divided into functional classes. For
`example,
`some cytokines are primarily lymphocyte
`growth factors, others function as pro-inflammatory
`or anti-inflammatory molecules whereas other cyto-
`kines polarize the immuneresponseto antigen. During
`the past 25 years, cytokines have become an important
`frontier in medicine in a vital place as diagnostic,
`prognostic and therapeutic agents in human disease.
`Although cytokines are studied today in nearly every
`biological discipline, cytokine-mediated effects domi-
`
`Correspondence: Charles A. Dinarello, University of Colorado
`Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Ave., B168, Denver,
`CO 80262, USA
`Fax: +1-303-315-8054
`e-mail: cdinare333@aol.com
`
`Abbreviations: CARD: caspase-1 recruitment domain -
`FGF: fibroblast growthfactors - IL-1Ra: IL-1R antagonist -
`PG: prostaglandin - VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor
`
`© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, KGaA, Weinheim
`
`nate the fields of inflammation, immunology, athero-
`sclerosis and cancer. For instance, chemokines and their
`receptors have
`impacted on
`inflammation, HIV-1
`pathogenesis, lymphocyte trafficking and autoimmune
`disease. Some chronic diseases appear to be driven by
`“autoinflammatory” pathways whereas others have
`classic characteristics of “autoimmune” mechanisms.
`Mutations in the gene NALP1 are associated with
`autoimmunediseases |1] whereas mutations in NALP3
`are associated with autoinflammatory diseases
`[2].
`Although there is clinical overlap in this classification,
`distinct cytokine portfolios have emerged based on the
`functions of
`the
`caspase-1
`“inflammasome”, The
`discovery of the mammalian surface Toll-like receptors
`(TLR)
`for
`recognizing a
`large and heterogeneous
`number of microbial products is intrinsic to cytokine
`biology because the intracellular signaling domains of
`TLR are nearly identical to those of the interleukin-1
`receptor (IL-1R), both mediating host
`responses to
`infection andinjury.
`
`WILEY
`InterScience’
`
`*%,
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 534-45
`
`Cytokines in evolution
`
`Cytokines evolved from the earliest forms as intracell-
`ular molecules before the appearance of receptors and
`signaling cascades. Cytokine-like activities have been
`demonstrated in invertebrates such as star fish and
`Drosophilia, where they played an essential role in host
`defense and repair. A cytokine-mediated rise in body
`temperature as survival mechanism was demonstrated
`in poikilothermiclizards [3]. Some cytokines function as
`transcription factors (likely their initial functions) as
`well as extracellular
`ligands
`for specific receptors
`(evolvedlater). Recordedhistory is full of examples of
`the devastating effect of infection on societies and one
`can argue that cytokine-mediated events underlie the
`pathological processes of these epidemics.
`Cytokine biology springs fromthe host production of
`“pus”. Long before the microscope, exudates containing
`pus andthe presenceoffever and local swelling and pain
`were well-documented by writers in the ancient world,
`Pus was visible and later could be studied in the
`laboratory. The field had its earliest advance with
`interest in soluble “factors”, as they were thencalled,
`which were studied in the mid-1940s as products of
`white blood cells (pus). Indeed, most cytokines are best
`definedas soluble factors producedby one cell that acts
`on another cell. Today, however, we recognize that
`cytokines can also function as
`integral membrane
`proteins and some are never released from the cell.
`Initially, cytokines werecalled “lymphokines”to distin-
`guish them from “monokines” in an attempt to classify
`these soluble factors by their primary sources, but that
`nomenclature was short-lived and yielded to “cyto-
`kines”. With the exception of the red blood cell, every
`cell can produceas well as respond toa cytokine,
`
`The pioneering days
`
`Soluble factors released from neutrophils from the
`peritoneal cavity of rabbits were thefirst to establish a
`link between adisease (in most cases infection) and the
`responseofthe host (fever). The biological properties of
`these soluble factors includedfever, resistance to viral
`infections, elevated white bloodcell count, the synthesis
`of acute-phase proteins, death of cancer cells and
`migration of
`inflammatory cells, Soluble factors as
`regulators of lymphocyte functions were not studied
`until
`the mid-1970s, with the first description of
`“lymphocyte activating factor” by Igal Gery and Byron
`Waksman[4] and later as T cell growth factor [5].
`A paradigmdevelopedthat a disease process induces
`the production of these soluble factors (cytokines) from
`cells and it
`is the property(s) of these “factors” that
`accounts for the manifestations of the disease. The
`
`Breakthrough
`
`$35
`
`is best appreciated with the non-specific
`concept
`physiological and immunological upheaval that the host
`initiates with infection. The “innate immuneresponse”is
`nothing more than a cytokine stormtoinfectionorto cell
`damage triggered by TLR. The hallmark of the innate
`immune response is
`its non-specific nature as
`the
`response occurs repeatedly,
`regardless of triggering
`event. The effect of the response on the specific or
`adaptive immune responseis actually collateral.
`
`The good and badof cytokines
`
`Here lies the conundrum in cytokine biology, particu-
`larly for
`the immunologist. The innate responseis
`required for host survival but is also causative indisease.
`For example, interferon (IFN)-y, essential for defense
`against several
`intracellular microorganisms such as
`Mycobacterium tuberculosis,
`is also a major cytokine in
`the pathogenesis of several autoimmunediseases. The
`issue of the “good cytokine versus the bad cytokine” has
`its greatest impact in therapeutic arena. IL-2 is needed
`for the generation of cytotoxic T cells (CTL) and forms
`the basis for several vaccines but
`the same cytokine
`drives graft-versus-host disease andlimits the success of
`bone marrow transplantation.
`
`Cytokine as hormonesof the immunesystem
`
`For sure, the definition of a cytokine as a soluble factor
`producedby onecell and acting on anothercell, in order
`to bring about a changein the functionof thetarget cell,
`was based on the endocrine system of hormones.
`In a
`way, one can consider cytokines as the “hormones”of
`immuneand inflammatory responses. However, several
`properties of cytokines escape this definition. For
`example,
`in lymphoid organs the role of cytokines in
`the humoral and cell-mediated immune response to
`antigen,
`is mainly local
`for paracrine and juxtacrine
`activities.
`In addition, hormones are the primary
`products of a specific tissue or cell whereas cytokines
`are products of most cells. But during a systemic
`inflammatory response, cytokines do exhibit endocrine-
`like activities, such as the synthesis of hepatic acute
`phase proteins and release of leukocytes from the bone
`marrow, both distant
`from a
`site of
`infection or
`inflammation. On a molar basis, cytokines are far more
`potent than hormones. For example, the concentration
`of the cytokine interleukin-1 (IL-1) that induces gene
`expression and synthesis of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is
`10 pM and the ability of IL-12 to induce IFN-y is 20 pM.
`In fact, because of their potency, during purification of
`some cytokines fromcell culture supernatents, it was not
`
`©) 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`S36
`
`Charles A. Dinarello
`
`Eur. J. Immunol, 2007. 37: 534—45
`
`uncommonto have abiological response in the absence
`of a visible band on gel electrophoresis.
`
`Genes and more genes
`
`The nomenclature of interleukins
`
`Being non-structural proteins, biological properties
`were andstill are the gold standards for defining a
`cytokine, The interleukin nomenclature was inventedto
`deal with the issue of multiple biological properties of
`cytokines. At the time of the naming these molecules
`with an interleukin number, primary amino acid
`sequences of the active molecules were not known.
`The term IL-1 was used to define a monocyte product
`and the term IL-2 was used to define a lymphocyte
`product. But the nomenclature did nothing to resolve
`the broader
`issue of multiple biological properties
`ascribed to a single molecule.
`IL-1 was reported to
`cause fever,
`induce acute-phase protein synthesis,
`activate B cells and act
`as a co-factor
`for
`T cell
`proliferation in the presence of antigens or mitogens.
`IL-2 was reported to expand T cell proliferation and also
`activate B cells. IL-2 was initially termed Tcell growth
`factor and expanded human Tcells in vitro [5]. T cell
`growth factor producedin thelaboratory of Robert Gallo
`at the NIH allowed for the isolation of HIV-1,
`
`The skeptics are rained in
`
`a single molecule could possess
`that
`The concept
`multiple and diverse biological activities was viewed
`with considerable skepticismby cell biologists but it was
`the immunological community that provided increas-
`ingly convincing data that indeedthis was the case. The
`issue was particularly problematic for those working
`with IL-1, as its properties ranged fromeffects on control
`of body temperatureto liver protein synthesis to T cell
`responses to antigens and mitogens.
`Despitehighly purified preparations of IL-1 andIL-2,
`it was the molecular cloning of the cDNA and the
`expression of recombinant forms ofthese cytokines that
`broke the impasse. All doubts were pushedaside using
`recombinant
`forms of cytokines [6]. A great deal of
`biology was accomplished using recombinant cytokines
`and immunological
`research advanced greatly with
`receptor identification. Recombinant cytokines were
`usednotonly to confirm the biological properties of the
`natural molecule derived from cell cultures but more
`importantly used to discover new properties. Recombi-
`nant cytokines also provided antigens for monoclonal
`antibody production and the ELISA kit. The ELISA kit
`liberated the immunologist from the tediumof bioassays
`and provided for a rapid method for determining the
`quantity of a cytokine.
`
`Today wespeak not only of a cytokine as a single gene
`product but also of cytokine families. The family of TNF
`includes over 20 members, each a separate gene product
`but with a considerable overlap in biological properties
`such
`cell
`death. Although
`there
`are
`presently
`33 interleukins,
`the IL-1 family has 11 members and
`include IL-la, IL-1, IL-18 and IL-33. Although each
`member of the IL-1 family is a separate gene,
`their
`products overlap in functions as pro-inflammatory
`cytokines. The family of IL-6 includes several members
`such as IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor,
`IL-11, oncos-
`tatin, ciliary neurotropic factor and cardiotropin-1, Each
`memberinduces hepatic acute-phase proteins in addi-
`tion to other unrelated biological properties. The IL-10
`family includes
`IL-22 and represents
`a
`family of
`cytokines
`that
`inhibit
`inflammation and immune
`responses. IL-15 accomplishes nearly the samefunctions
`as does IL-2. Colony-stimulating factors such as IL-3,
`G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, have overlapping functions but
`remain distinct gene products with specific receptors.
`The most
`impressive families are the chemokine
`families.
`In total, there are over 30 individual human
`genes for chemokines. Althoughthere are twostructural
`classes, the CC chemokines and the CXC chemokines,
`regardless of structure, chemokines orchestrate cell
`migration from the blood compartment into thetissues.
`Whythis duplication of function? Such duplication in
`function is not
`found in the endocrine system of
`hormones.
`
`Duplication of function
`
`The duplication in cytokine function is best explained
`from the viewpoint of host defense and immune
`function. Challenged with death from microbial
`inva-
`sion, the host turns on most cytokine genes. There are
`probably few persons reading this feature who havenot
`cleared a pneumococcal bacteremia without antibiotics.
`In doing so, cytokines mobilize several mechanisms for
`defeating microbial invaders. For example, cells migrate
`to the site of infection,
`reactive oxygen species are
`producedto aid in phagocyte-mediatedkilling, and pro-
`coagulant activities are initiated to wall-off the invader
`and limit spread of the infection. At
`the same time,
`several cytokines assist dendritic cells in the process of
`antigen (microbial) presentation, which results in the
`generation of CTL and production of neutralizing
`antibodies.
`It
`is unlikely that evolution could depend on a few
`cytokines to rescue the host from alethal infection. The
`large numberof cytokines induced during an infection
`also includes cytokines that aid in repair. For example,
`
`©2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`Eur. J. Immunol, 2007, 37: $3445
`
`Breakthrough
`
`$37
`
`fibroblast growth factors (FGF) and vascular endothelial
`growth factor (VEGF) should be considered cytokines
`that participatein the healing process. But again, weare
`faced with the duality in cytokine biology as FGFis a
`pathological molecule in lung and liver fibrosis and
`VEGE is a pathological molecule in cancer.
`
`Dysregulation of cytokine production
`
`Cytokines wreak havoe with the immune system turning
`against itself in autoimmune diseases. During infection,
`the cytokine “storm” subsides as
`the infection is
`eliminated and the genes return to their normal state
`of being repressed by histone deacetylases. When
`cytokines genes fail to shut down, their products drive
`the host into a state of chronically activated cells, which
`now dominate an otherwise resting immune system.
`Auto-reactive Tcells are cells that persist andfail to die.
`There are likely other mechanismsof“failure to die” that
`account
`for
`the persistence which are influenced
`genetically. Most anti-cytokine therapies for autoim-
`mune disease
`target
`the
`effects of cytokines on
`inflammatory andtissue remodeling processes but seem
`unable to shut down the persistently activated auto-
`reactive T cell.
`
`develop normally and for the most part age normally
`without a spontaneous disease. Only when challenged
`with disease-inducing events does the deficiency reveal
`a role for the cytokine.
`In contrast, mice deficient in IL-10, IL-1R antagonist
`(IL-IRa) or IL-2 develop spontaneous diseases. The
`diseases are inflammatory such as inflammatory bowel
`disease and arthritis. In the case ofIL-18-deficient mice,
`spontaneousdisease develops only as the mice age when
`they begin to eat excessively, becomeobese, diabetic and
`atherosclerotic [10]. Thus IL-18 deficiency reveals a
`property of the cytokine neveranticipated as a mediator
`of Thl and Th2 responses.
`Another advance in cytokine biology came as the
`genomic make-up of a species was sequencedyielding
`thousands of genes without known function. The cDNA
`for human IL-32 was deposited in the gene bank
`13 years ago but remained without function until the
`recombinant cytokine was tested and anti-IL-32 anti-
`bodies usedto detect its presence in disease [11]. IL-32 is
`a pro-inflammatory cytokine inducing TNF-u, IL-1and
`several chemokines, and is
`found in tissues
`from
`rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease [12]. One
`can asked the question: how manyothergenes presently
`with unknownfunction are actually cytokines and may
`have a role in immunological functions or disease?
`
`Gene deletions and gene screenings advance
`the field
`
`Thefailures and benefits of cytokines for
`treating human disease
`
`for cytokine studies remains mole-
`The major impact
`cular cloning of biologically active molecules,the testing
`of recombinantcytokines, and the identification oftheir
`specific receptors [7]. The most recent example of this
`area is the identification of IL-33. IL-33 is the specific
`ligand for the orphan receptor ST2 [8]. A great deal
`about the functionofthis receptor for the Th2 response
`and allergic diseases was gained over the past 12 years
`without knowing the ligand [9]. With the cloning of
`IL-33,
`the recombinant cytokine fulfills each of the
`biological properties attributed to the receptor and
`closes the circle.
`Although neutralizing antibodies greatly advanced
`cytokine studies, deleting a specific cytokine gene or
`receptor in a mouse wasalso a major advance. However,
`in the gene deletion studies, the unexpected finding was
`that most cytokine or cytokine receptordeletions did not
`affect the mouse unless the mouse was challenged with
`infection or an immunological challenge. The lack of a
`phenotype in cytokine-deficient mice supports
`the
`concept that most cytokines are not needed for health
`but
`rather for
`infections,
`trauma or
`immunological
`challenge. For example, mice deficient in IL-la, IL-1,
`caspase-1, ‘TNF-a orIL-6 are fertile, and their off-spring
`
`With progress in the late 1970s on the biological
`activities of “soluble factors” came increasing interest
`from the pharmaceutical industry. In fact, the develop-
`ment of
`the biotech industry can be
`linked to
`developments in cytokine biology, particularly as cDNA
`and recombinant cytokines validated the field. The
`molecular cloning of the first cytokines in the early
`1980s (IFN-a, IL-1, IL-2 and TNF-«) coincided in 1984
`withthe discovery of HIV-1 as the causative agent in the
`acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Thera-
`peutic use ofIL-1 andIL-2 held great promiseas natural
`immuno-stimulant to combat the immunedeficiency of
`AIDS. At
`the same time,
`it was thought
`that
`the
`immunosuppression of cancer could be reversed by
`injecting patients with immuno-stimulating cytokines.
`There was no dearth of animal and in vitro studies to
`support trials for treating cancer patients or patients
`with AIDS with these cytokines. At the same time TNF-a
`held promise for treating patients with cancer. The fact
`remains, however, that injecting humans withIL-1, IL-2,
`IL-3,
`IL-4, IL-6, IL-12 or TNF-a induces unacceptable
`systemic inflammationandthe use of these cytokinesas
`therapies was abandoned.
`
`© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`. 538
`
`Charles A. Dinarello
`
`Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37: S34—45
`
`The only cytokine to receive approval for treating
`canceris IL-2, but its pro-inflammatory effects are not
`easily tolerated by most patients andits efficacy in
`treating melanomaand renal cell carcinoma is low. IL-10
`was an outstanding candidate for treating a variety of
`autoimmune diseases as IL-10 suppressed IFN-y, IL-1,
`TNF-a and IL-6 production as well as possessing other
`anti-inflammatory activities. Several trials of recombi-
`nant human IL-10 showed limited efficacy in psoriasis,
`rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease, but
`the
`cytokine has never been approvedfor therapeutic use.
`Onthe other hand, colony-stimulating factors such as
`G-CSF or GM-CSF are used to treat bone marrow
`suppression associated with radiation, chemotherapy or
`transplantation, GM-CSF has also been used to treat
`Crohn's disease. Erythropoietinis routinely usedto large
`numbers of patients with anemia and bone marrow
`failure. Impressively, IFN-a is administeredto millions of
`patients to treat hepatitis B and C.
`IFN-B for
`the
`treatment of multiple sclerosis is also effective.
`
`Blocking cytokines in autoimmunedisease
`succeeds
`
`The same agents that failed in clinical trials for sepsis
`werealso tested in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,
`Crohn's disease and plaque psoriasis.
`In the case of
`blocking TNF-a, monoclonal antibodies to TNF-a or
`soluble TNF receptors
`(TNFR)
`have been highly
`successful
`in these autoimmune diseases and used in
`over 800 000 patients. As a result, nearly every anti-
`cytokine agent, whether an orally active inhibitor of a
`cytokine-regulated intracellular pathway, a neutralizing
`antibody or a soluble receptoror a receptor antagonist,
`is tested in patients with rheumatoidarthritis, Crohn's
`Disease or psoriasis. Blocking IL-1, IL-6, IL-12 or IL-23
`has been successful. Blocking IL-15 or IL-18 has been
`marginal. In general, animal models can predict which
`cytokines arelikely to improve rheumatoidarthritis as
`well as Crohn's Disease [14], but do not predict which
`anti-cytokine is efficacious for one patient but not
`another.
`
`Blocking cytokines in humans
`
`The use of agents that specifically block the activity ofa
`cytokinetruly defines the role of that cytokine in disease
`or in an immunological response, Although blocking
`cytokines in animal models with neutralizing strategies
`established the importance of
`a
`cytokine in
`the
`pathogenesis or progression of disease, approval
`for
`use in humans remains the ultimate goal,
`Thefirst studies of blocking a cytokine in humans was
`based on reducing IL-1 and TNF-u activity in animal
`models of lethal endotoxemia or live infections. The
`animal studies were impressively revealing in
`that
`blocking either of these cytokines reduced mortality
`andthereforeit was logical to reduceIL-1 and or TNF-a in
`patients with sepsis. Despite sophisticated intensive care
`units, death fromsepsis has an unacceptable mortality
`rate with over 500 000 cases in the USA each year.
`Therefore, billions of dollars were invested in
`the
`development of blocking agents and testing in place-
`bo-controlledtrialsin over 12 000patients. Only marginal
`reductions in all-cause 28 day mortality were achieved,
`insufficient
`to gain approval. A meta-analysis of the
`clinical trials concluded that like in the animal studies, a
`mortality benefit of blocking IL-1 or TNF-a was only
`observed in patients at the highest risk of death [13].
`Blocking IL-4 or IL-5 for treating asthma was based a
`well-established animal model of airway antigen
`challenge but the results in several placebo-controlled
`trials did not show sufficient efficacy. Blocking chemo-
`kines was also thought
`to be a therapeutic strategy;
`neutralizing anti-IL-8 failed to affect psoriasis.
`
`Autoimmuneversus autoinflammatory
`disease
`
`As the properties of various cytokines were investigated,
`understanding the linkage between inflammation and
`immune responses expanded. For some cytokines, the
`ability to induce
`inflammatory mediators
`such a
`prostaglandins (PG), nitric oxide or reactive oxygen
`species impacts greatly on immuneresponses in chronic
`diseases. Autoimmune diseases have both dysfunctional
`immuneresponsesas well as a prominent inflammatory
`component. For example, in the treatment of rheuma-
`toid arthritis, psoriasis or Crohn's disease by blocking
`TNF-o or IL-12 activities, there is both a reduction in
`chronic inflammation and a_ partial
`restoration of
`suppressed immune responses. Other chronic diseases
`appear to be mostly inflammatory in nature and dueto
`dysregulation ofIL-1} processing and secretion. These
`diseases are called autoinflammatory to distinguish
`them from autoimmunediseases.
`As shownin Table 1, examples of autoinflammatory
`diseases are familial Mediterranean fever, neonatal
`onset multiple
`system inflammatory disease,
`and
`systemic onset
`juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Patients
`with these diseases suffer from chronic fevers, systemic
`inflammation andpainful joints. However, upon block-
`ing IL-1 activity there is a rapid reversal of disease
`severity. The pathological abnormality in autoinflam-
`matory diseases appears to be a failure to control the
`processing and secretion of
`IL-1f}
`in
`that
`blood
`monocytes from patients with these diseases release
`more active IL-1f} compared to cells from non-disease
`subjects. The processing and secretion of
`IL-If} is
`
`© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.eji-journal.eu
`
`

`

`Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37: S34-45
`
`Breakthrough
`
`S39 4
`
`Table 1. Characteristics of autoinflammatory and autoimmunediseases
`
`Autoimmunediseases
`Autoinflammatory diseases
`
`Dominant cytokine = IL-1f}
`Secondary cytokine = IL-6
`
`Dominant cell = macrophage » T cell
`
`» B cell
`
`Examples*’
`Familial Mediterranean fever
`
`Dominant cytokine = TNF-«
`Secondary cytokines = IFN-y/IL-17/IL-23
`
`- macrophage
`
`Dominant cell = T cell
`Secondary cell = B cell
`Examples”)
`Rheumatoid arthritis
`
`Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome
`
`Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
`
`Muckle-Wells syndrome
`
`Neonatal onset multi-inflammatory disease
`
`Hyper-IgD syndrome
`
`Adult and juvenile Still's disease
`
`Anti-synthetase syndrome
`
`Macrophage activation syndrome
`Urticarial vasculitis
`
`Behcet's syndrome, Blau's syndrome, PAPA syndrome
`
`Schnitzler's syndrome, Sweet's syndrome
`
`Ankylosing spondylitis
`Crohn's disease
`
`Psoriasis
`
`Lupus erythematosus
`
`Pemphygus
`
`Wegener's granulomatosis
`Sarcoidosis
`
`Urate crystal arthritis (gout)
`
`Type 2 diabetes
`®) Blocking IL-1} effective therapy; blocking IL-6 effective; blocking TNF-u minimally effective or exacerbation of disease.
`») Blocking TNF-u, IL-23, CD20, CTLA-4-lg, IL-1f) effective therapy.
`
`cysteine
`an intracellular
`controlled by caspase-1,
`protease that cleaves the IL-1precursor as well as
`those

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket