throbber
A Meeting Library | Antitu x
`se h 2
`<€ + 0 (4|https://meetinglibrary.asco.org/record/108612/abstract
`*
`
`
`
`ASCO Meeting Library
`
`Antitumor Activity of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Biomarker-
`Unselected Patients with R/M Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Results from
`KEYNOTE-012 Expansion Cohort
`Presented Monday,June 1, 2015
`
`signin CQ ?)
`
`Addto Collection @
`
`Abstract
`6 Video @ slides
`
`Authors:
`TanguyY. Seiwert, Robert |. Haddad, Shilpa Gupta, Ranee Mehra, Makoto Tahara, Raanan
`Berger, Se-Hoon Lee, Barbara Burtness, Dung T. Le, Karl Heath, Amy Blum, Marisa Dolled-Filhart,
`Kenneth Emancipator, Kumudu Pathiraja, Jonathan D. Cheng, Laura Q. Chow: The University of
`Chicago, Chicago, IL; Dana-Farber CancerInstitute, Boston, MA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
`and Research Institute, Tampa...
`View More +
`
`First Author: ceeaD
`
`Meeting:
`
`Session
`Type:
`
`2015 ASCO
`Annual Meeti
`eee
`Oral Abstract
`Session
`
`
`
`
`
`AbstractDisclosures
`.
`Background:
`Pembrolizumab (MK-3475)is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction of PD-1
`[=|
`Head and Neck
`withits ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby promotingactivity of tumor-specific effectorT cells.
`ia)
`Cancer
`KEYNOTE 012 (NCTO1848834) had previously demonstratedclinical activity of pembrolizumab
`fe)
`LeAsoos
`Abstract#:
`10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN enriched for PD-L1-
`positive tumors with a response rate of 20%. We now report on the larger SCCHN expansion
`
`cohort of KEYNOTE 012,irrespective of biomarker status using a 3-weekly fixed dose. Clinical Trial§=—NCTO1848834
`Registry
`Number:
`
`aes "
`Track:
`
`centane Neck
`Head and Neck
`cee
`
`Methods:
`Pts with advanced SCCHN irrespective of PD-L1 expression or HPV status received a fixed dose
`of 200 mg pembrolizumab,intravenously, every 3 weeks. Pts were evaluated every 8 weeks with
`radiographic imaging. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) perinvestigator
`assessment (RECI|ST 1.1). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and
`overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to CTCAE v4. PD-L1 was
`assessed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry.
`
`Results:
`132 pts with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN were enrolled. Mean (SD) age was 58.9 (9.7) years;
`83.3% were male; 56.8% had 2 2 lines of therapy for recurrent disease. 73/132 pts (55.3%)
`remain on treatment. Out of 132 treated pts, 99 pts were available for this preliminary efficacy
`analysis with a post-baseline scan or discontinued therapy prior to the scan dueto clinical
`progression or AE. ORR(confirmed and unconfirmed) per RECIST 1.1 was 18.2% (95% Cl, 11.1-
`27.2) with 18 partial responses and 31.3% with stable disease. Biomarkeranalysis is ongoing
`and results will be presented. Drug-related AEs of any grade occurred in 47% ofall enrolled pts,
`and drug-related grade = 3 AEs occurredin 7.6%. The mast common drug-related AEs ( = 5%) of
`any grade were fatigue (12.1%), decreased appetite (6.8%), pyrexia (6.1%), and rash (5.3%).
`
`Conclusions:
`
`Pembrolizumab givenat a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks was well tolerated and
`demonstrated a clinically meaningful ORR of 18.2% in pts with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN.
`Clinicaltrial information: NCT01848834
`
`Subtrack:
`
`ceeton:
`
`20'5Gurel
`ebstr LEAGOOS)
`Head and neck squamous cell
`Geren)
`Outcome assessment
`
`Drug safety
`
`Advanced disease
`
`Programmed deathligand 1
`Biomarkers.
`
`Late breaking abstracts
`2015 Annual Meeting
`Proceedings Notices
`
`
`
`Genome & Co. v. Univ. of Chicago, PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2045
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket