throbber
THE INTERNATIONAL WEEKLY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
`
`fa
`
`DEC 29 2011
`
`
`
`ONOF REMOVE FROM
`Bent PERIODICALS
`
`|
`
`Genome & Co.v. Univ. of Chicago
`
`PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2036
`The newsmakersof the year pase4s7
`
`_ PHYSICS
`REBOOTING
`{ticlecould tiestring
`
`eory to standard model
`PAGE 415
`
`THE CROP
`CREAM OF
`Editors’pickof2011’s
`
`outstandingarticles
`PAGE 468
`
`DIRECTORY.2012
`EV
`Yourguidetoglobalscientific
`
`events and courses
`BACK PAGES & NATUREEVENTS.COM
`
`© NATURE.COM/NATU
`22/29 December 2011
`
`ieil
`
`| i
`
`6°03
`
`
`
`r
`|
`
`

`

` CONTENTS
`
`22/29 December2011 / Vol 480 / Issue No 7378
`
`EDITORIAL
`4l4/ Ten for 2011
`Capturing the characters of the year
`
`NEWS
`426 2011 in review.
`_/Fromseandals to fallout‘and all
`points between
`430 Images oftheyear’
`
`FEATURES
`//
`//////
`437 /Nature’s10°///
`Whowerethe people whomade a
`mark on the past’12months?
`
`1/2011 1N REVIEW
`
`theyearin science
`
`365DAYS:
`
`COMMENT /
`447 The new history
`Philip Ball
`The major events of 2011 were
`driven by complexity as well as
`social media and‘globalization
`/NEWS & VIEWS
`468° Editors’ choice
`Alook back at some of the
`highlights from this year’s
`News & Views.
`
`Coverandillustrations by Carl DeTorres
`
`SD aature.com/2011
`
`THIS WEEK
`
`|
`
`NEWS IN FOCUS
`
`|
`
`COMMENT
`
`EDITORIALS
`413 POLICY
`The morningafter
`The US government was wrongto
`overrule recommendations on Plan B
`
`413
`
`ENVIRONMENT
`Defend the Amazon
`Brazil's attempts to reform forest
`protection must be reworked
`
`WORLD VIEW
`415 Particle physics is at a turning point
`Gordon Kane
`The putative discovery of the Higgs
`bosonis a boonfor string theorists
`
`RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS
`416 SELECTIONS FROM THE
`SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
`Mercury's
`magnetosphere/ Egg
`counts / Bacterial
`microtubules / Why
`frogs make music / Lost
`Hox genes / Owning the
`world / Neanderthals
`not up to sniff
`
`
`
`SEVEN DAYS
`418 THE NEWSIN BRIEF
`Fukushimafinally in shutdown / The
`world’s tiniest tetrapod / Vote on
`Brazilian forest postponed / Variome
`initiative under way in China
`
`421 BIOSAFETY
`Altered bird-flu virus raises questions
`about lab security
`423 POLICY
`US budget paves the way for new
`NIH centre
`
`closer to reality
`
`424 ANIMAL RESEARCH
`Report spells out
`toughcriteria for
`NIH-funded chimp
`research
`
`425 POLICY
`US integrity rules edge
`
`449 SCIENCE PUBLISHING
`The paper is not sacred
`Adam Marcus & Ivan Oransky
`Therise in retractions this year argues
`for the broadening of peer review
`
`BOOKS & ARTS
`451 TECHNOLOGY
`Rise of the e-book
`Carl Zimmer
`
`452 FOOD SCIENCE
`With pipette and ladle
`
`
`
`HaroldMcGee a
`
`453 O&A
`The snowflake designer
`Physicist Kenneth Libbrecht takes the
`study of snowflakes to extremes
`455 IN RETROSPECT
`On the Six-Cornered Snowflake
`Philip Ball
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`457 Leonardo da Vinci's physics / Europe's
`threatened vultures / Thefirst cells
`
`OBITUARY
`458 Lynn Margulis (1938-2011)
`James A Lake
`
`
`FUTURES
`578 Tea withJillian
`Brenda Cooper
`
`
`
`
`
`CAREERS
`
`575 AWARDS
`Conscientious counsellors
`Nature's 2011 mentoring awards go
`Parisienne
`
`576 COLUMN
`Testing the waters
`Postdocs and industry do mix, say
`Christopher Tsang and Michael Fisher
`
`natureevents
`
`
`
`Your guideto global scientific events
`and coursesin 2012
`
`22/29 DECEMBER 2011 |
`
`VOL 480 | NATURE | 407
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`22/29 December 2011 / Vol 480 / Issue No 7378
`
`RESEARCH
`
`REVIEWS
`47|
`ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Rethinking
`amide bond synthesis
`VR Pattabiraman & J W Bode
`
`480
`
`CANCER Cancer immunotherapy
`comesof age
`| Mellman, G Coukos & G Dranoff
`
`ARTICLE
`490
`GENOMICS DNA-binding factors
`shape the mouse methylome at
`distal regulatory regions
`MB Stadleretal.
`
`LETTERS
`496
`ASTRONOMY A compactsystem of small
`planets around a former red-giant star
`S Charpinetet al. SEE N&V P.460
`
`500
`
`504
`
`509
`
`513
`
`516
`
`520
`
`529
`
`530
`
`PHYSICS Orbital excitation blockade and
`algorithmic cooling in quantum gases
`WS Bakr etal. SEE N&V P.463
`
`MATERIALS SCIENCE Tuning charge
`transport in solution-sheared organic
`semiconductors using lattice strain
`G Giri etal.
`
`CLIMATE SCIENCE Forcing of wet phases
`in southeastAfrica overthe past
`17,000 years
`E SchefuB, H Kuhlmann, G Mollenhauer,
`M Prange & J Patzold
`
`PALAEONTOLOGY Lowland-upland
`migration of sauropod dinosaurs during
`the Late Jurassic epoch
`HC Fricke, J Hencecroth & M E Hoerner
`
`ECOLOGY Additive threats from
`pathogens, climate and land-use
`changefor global amphibian diversity
`C Hof, M B Aratijo, W Jetz & C Rahbek
`SEE N&V P.461
`
`GENOMICS The Medicago genome
`provides insight into the evolution of
`rhizobial symbioses
`ND Youngetal.
`
`NEUROBIOLOGY Natural polymorphisms
`in C. elegans HECW-1 E3ligase affect
`pathogen avoidance behaviour
`HC Chang, J Paek & DH Kim
`
`VIROLOGY Adherensjunction protein
`nectin-4 is the epithelial receptor for
`measles virus
`MD Muhlebachetal.
`
`534 PARASITOLOGY Basigin is a receptor
`essential for erythrocyte invasion by
`Plasmodium falciparum
`C Crosnieretal.
`
`538
`
`543
`
`547
`
`552
`
`597
`
`561
`
`565
`
`570
`
`IMMUNOLOGY Responseto self antigen
`imprints regulatory memory in tissues
`M D Rosenblum et al.
`
`CELL BIOLOGY Excitation-induced
`ataxin-3 aggregation in neurons from
`patients with Machado-Joseph disease
`PKochetal.
`
`STEM CELLS Dopamine neurons derived
`from human EScells efficiently engraft
`in animal models of Parkinson's disease
`S Kriks etal.
`
`METABOLISM Cryptochromes
`mediate rhythmic repression of
`the glucocorticoid receptor
`KALamia etal. SEE N&V P.466
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY GleNAcylation of histone
`H2B facilitates its monoubiquitination
`R Fujiki et al.
`
`MOLECULAR BIOLOGY An equilibrium-
`dependent retroviral mRNA switch
`regulates translational recoding
`B Houck-Loomis etal.
`
`STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY Structures of
`the multidrug exporter AcrB reveal a
`proximal multisite drug-binding pocket
`R Nakashima, K Sakurai, S Yamasaki,
`K Nishino & A Yamaguchi
`BIOCHEMISTRY Intermediatesin the
`transformation of phosphonates
`to phosphate by bacteria
`SS Kamat, HJ Williams & F M Raushel
`
`GENOMICS
`
`Top model
`
`The genomeofbarrel clover, green
`
`manure and model legume. PAGE 520
`
`|
`
`|
`
`|
`
`|
`
`|
`|
`
`22/29 DECEMBER 2011 | VOL 480 | NATURE | 409
`
`NEW ONLINE
`459 Papers publishedthis weekat nature.com
`
`NEWS & VIEWS
`460 PLANETARY SCIENCE
`Theultimatefate of planets
`Discovery of a planetary system in orbit
`around an evolved star
`Eliza MR Kempton SEE LETTER P.496
`ECOLOGY
`Bleak future for amphibians
`Predicting the distribution of
`threats to amphibians
`Ross A Alford SEE LETTER P.516
`
`461
`
`MATERIALS SCIENCE
`
`Take charge
`
`Repackaging organic semiconductors
`to be moreflexible. PAGE 504
`
`ier
`
`ryeatt Rt ¢ a WYWAY
`
`a
`
`463 ATOMIC PHYSICS
`When ultracold is not cold enough
`How to cool quantum atomic gasesin
`optical lattices
`Gretchen K Campbell SEE LETTER P.500
`463 PSYCHOLOGY
`Who needs a leader?
`The dynamicsofjoint improvisation
`Sadaf Shadan
`
`465 CONDENSED-MATTER PHYSICS
`A fresh twist on shrinking materials
`Negative thermal expansionin
`scandium trifluoride
`J PaulAttfield
`
`466 PHYSIOLOGY
`On time metabolism
`Glucocorticoid signalling by the clock
`Joseph Bass SEE LETTER P.552
`468 EDITORS’ CHOICE
`The News & Viewshighlights of 2011
`
`

`

`nature
`
`92/29 December 2011 / Vol 480 / Issue No. 7378
`
`MARKETING & SUBSCRIPTIONS
`EDITORIAL
`nature@nature.com
`USA/CANADA/LATIN AMERICA
`subscriptions@us.nature.com
`LONDON, MUNICH, WASHINGTONDC, NEW YORK,
`Tel: (USA/Canada)+1 866 363 7860; (outside USA/Canada) +1 212 726 9223
`BOSTON, PARIS, SAN FRANCISCO, TOKYO
`MARKETING: Sara Girard FULFILMENT: Karen Dawson
`EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Philip Campbell
`MANAGING EDITOR: Nick Campbell
`subscriptions@natureasia.com
`JAPAN/CHINA/KOREA
`Tel: +81 3.3267 8751 MARKETING/PRODUCTION:Keiko Ikeda, Takesh Murakami
`PUBLISHING EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Maxine Clarke EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Véronique Kiermer
`CHIEF MAGAZINE EDITOR: Tim Appenzeller
`EUROPE/REST OF WORLD
`subscriptions@nature.com
`THIS WEEK/NEWS/FEATURES:Alison Abbott, David Adam, Ananyo Bhattacharya, Geoff Brumfiel,
`Tel: +44 (0)1256 329242
`MARKETING: Elena Woodstock, Marcus Parker, Hannah Phipps FULFILMENT: Jean Burrows
`Declan Butler, Ewen Callaway, Erika Check Hayden, Daniel Cressey, David Cyranoski,
`Natasha Gilbert, Eric Hand, Heidi Ledford, Corie Lok, Brendan Maher, Emma Marris,
`INDIA
`npgindia@nature.com
`Tel: #91 124 2881053/54
`Richard Monastersky, Brian Owens, Helen Pearson, Mark Peplow, Eugenie SamuelReich,
`Ivan Semeniuk, Quirin Schiermeier,Jeff Tollefson, Richard Van Noorden, Meredith Wadman,
`HEAD OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT,INDIA: Debashish Brahmachari MARKETING: Harpal Singh Gill
`M Mitchell Waldrop COMMENT: Sara Abdulla, Joanne Baker, Rosalind Cotter, Barbara Kiser,
`ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONS (UK/Europe,including post and packing)
`Alison McCook, Lucy Odling-Smee, Sarah Tomlin NATURE PODCAST/VIDEO: Adam Rutherford,
`FULL RATE: £1,400
`Eric Olson, Kerri Smith, Charlotte Stoddart NEWS AND VIEWS: Sadaf Shadan, Ana Lopes, Andrew
`PERSONALRATES: UK £135; Europe €209; Rest of World £210
`Mitchinson, Cesar Sanchez RESEARCH: Ritu Dhand,Karl Ziemelis, Francesca Cesari, |-han Chou,
`STUDENT RATES: UK £79; Europe €122; Rest of World £125
`Tanguy Chouard, Rosamund Daw, Alex Eccleston, Angela Eggleston, Joshua Finkelstein, Henry
`Individual rates apply to payments by personal chequeorcredit card. Back issues: £20.00.
`Gee, Patrick Goymer, Noah Gray, Marie-Thérése Heemels, Magdalena Helmer, Karen Howell,
`ANNUALSUBSCRIPTIONS (USA,including post and packing)
`Claudia Lupp, Barbara Marte, Andrew Mitchinson,Alberto Moscatelli, Juliane Méssinger, Deepa
`INSTITUTIONAL/CORPORATERATE: $2,730 ; PERSONAL RATE: $199; STUDENT RATE: $99;
`Nath,Leslie Sage, Magdalena Skipper, Clare Thomas, John VanDecar, Liesbeth Venema, Ursula
`POSTDOC RATE: $119
`Weiss, Michael White INSIGHTS/REVIEWS/PERSPECTIVES: Ursula Weiss CAREERS: Gene Russo, Karen
`Printed in USA. Individual rates available only to subscribers paying by personal check orcredit
`Kaplan TECHNOLOGY FEATURES: Monya Baker FUTURES: Henry Gee SUPPLEMENTS: Herb Brody,
`card. Orders for student/postdoc subscriptions must be accompanied by a copyof student
`Michelle Grayson, Tony Scully SUBEDITORS: Colin Sullivan, Sarah Archibald, Nicola Bailey, Anne
`ID, Rates apply to USA, Canada, Mexico/Central & South America. Add 7% GSTtax in Canada
`Blewett, Nicolas Fanget, Isobel Flanagan,Paul Fletcher, Afsaneh Gray, Dinah Loan, Anna Novitzky,
`(Canadian GST number 140911595). BACK ISSUES: US$20.00,
`Yukie Ozawa, Katherine Perry, David Price, Jenny Rooke, Chris Simms, David Winters, Anna York
`ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONS(Asia, including post and packing)
`PRODUCTION: Jenny Henderson, Gemma Carder, Leonora Dawson-Bowling, Dan Foley,
`JAPAN: ERIMge: Nature D2 437,800 Fl +21,890 FA (AME) =459,690 Fi (at)
`Stewart Fraser, Susan Gray, Simon Gribbin, James McQuat, Emilia Orviss, Yvonne Strong,
`Nature + Nature Digest 466,550 FP] +23,328 9 GAM) =489,878 (Sat)
`Robert Sullivan, Roberta Tarran, Charles Wenz ART AND DESIGN: Kelly Buckheit Krause, Wesley
`
`SAVSht BHR RRS BASS 1 a
`Fernandes, Madeline Hutchinson, Barbara lzdebska, Paul Jackman,Jasiek Krzysztofiak, Annthea
`
`
`
`F101-0064 WHF BRASH1-2-1 Tel: 03-3292-3767 Fax: 03-3292-8766
`Lewis, Nik Spencer, Claire Welsh, Mark Wood JAPAN EDITION: Mika Nakano, Akemi Tanaka, Mitsuyo
`BA/PEMRIC IUIT
`Utsugi PRESS OFFICE: Ruth Francis, Neda Afsarmanesh,Lisa Boucher, Rachel Twinn, Rebecca
`NPG 44 Fe-— PSP NSD FIle tIbAYE aWAPY—T-ER
`Walton ADMINISTRATION: Paul Sng, Helen Anthony, Liz Bankes, Roseann Campbell, Faye Fornasier,
`F162-0843 BME HS AR) 2-37 FR BEL Tel: 03-3267-8759 Fax: 03-3267-8752
`AmyInvernizzi, Diane Kempinski, Hazel Mayhew, Katie McGoldrick, Jenny Meyer, Rina Nozawa,
`CHINA: www.natureasia.com/ch/subscribe; KOREA: www.natureasia.com/korea/subscribe
`Kenneth Simpson,Claire Smith, Tanya Szwarnowska
`WWW.NATURE,COM/NATURE
`NATURE ONLINE
`PUBLISHING
`CHIEF TECHNOLOGYOFFICER: HowardRatner ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, NATURE.COM: DanielPollock
`LONDON
`feedback@nature.com
`MANAGING DIRECTOR & PUBLISHER: Steven Inchcoombe
`PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT:Jeremy Macdonald WEB PRODUCTION: Alexander Thurrell, Deborah
`Anthony WEB DESIGN: Juan-Carlos Sobrino, Luke Stavenhagen PLATFORM INTERFACES: Amanda Ward
`ASSISTANT PUBLISHER: Arash Hejazi
`PUBLISHING PROJECT MANAGER: Christian Manco
`
`SITE LICENCES, FULFILMENT & CUSTOMER SERVICES
`PROJECT MANAGER: Helen Anthony
`TOKYO
`SITE LICENCES: npg.nature.com/libraries
`feedback@nature.com
`CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER: John Carroll ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS: Dominic Pettit
`PUBLISHING DIRECTOR — ASIA-PACIFIC: David Swinbanks
`CUSTOMER SERVICE: Gerald Coppin ORDER PROCESSING OPERATIONS: Steve Poulter
`ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR — ASIA-PACIFIC: Antoine E Bocquet
`
`feedback@natureasia.com
`
`
`
`
`DISPLAY ADVERTISING, SPONSORSHIP & NATUREJOBS
`GLOBAL HEAD: Andrew Douglas
`a.douglas@nature.com
`DISPLAY ADVERTISING AND SPONSORSHIP
`g.preston@nature.com
`GLOBAL HEAD: Gerard Preston
`ASSISTANT SPONSORSHIP MANAGER: Reya Silao Tel: +44 (0)20 7843 4977 (rsilao@nature.com)
`EUROPE/REST OF WORLDdisplay@nature.com Tel: +44 (0)20 7843 4960
`GERMANY/SWITZERLAND/AUSTRIA: Sabine Hugi-First Tel: +41 52761 3386
`UK/IRELAND/SCANDINAVIA/SPAIN/PORTUGAL: Evelina Rubio Hakansson Tel: +44 (0)20 7843 4079
`FRANCE/BELGIUM/THE NETHERLANDS/LUXEMBOURG/ITALY/OTHER EUROPE:Nicola Wright
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7843 4959
`NORTH AMERICA
`NEW ENGLAND/ EASTERN CANADA: Sheila Reardon Tel: +1 617 494 4900
`NEW YORK/MID-ATLANTIC/SOUTHEAST:Jim Breault Tel: +1 212 726 9334
`MIDWEST:Mike Rossi Tel: +1 212 726 9255
`WEST COAST/ WESTERN CANADA: George Lui Tel: +1 415 781 3804
`WEST COAST NORTH: Kayla McCutchan Tel; +1 415 403 9038
`ASIA-PACIFIC
`ASIA-PACIFIC HEAD: Kate Yoneyama
`JAPAN: Ken Mikami Tel: +81 3 3267 8765
`GREATER CHINA/SINGAPORE:; Gloria To Tel: +852 2811 7191
`INDIA: Vikas Chawla Tel: +91 124 283 1057
`SPONSORSHIP
`BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: David Bagshaw Tel: +1 212 726 9215 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
`MANAGER:Patrick Murphy Tel: +1 617 4759216
`NATUREJOBS
`EUROPEAN HEADOFFICE, LONDON;Tel; +44 (0)20 7843 4961
`EUROPEAN SALES MANAGER:Nils Moeller (n.moeller@nature.com) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER,
`MIDDLE EAST: Jon Giuliani (j.giuliani@nature.com) ADVERTISING PRODUCTION MANAGER: Stephen
`Russell NATUREJOBS ONLINE PRODUCTION: Dennis Chu
`US HEAD OFFICE, NEW YORK: naturejobs@natureny.com US SALES MANAGER: Ken Finnegan
`JAPAN HEAD OFFICE, TOKYO: Tel: +81 3 3267 8765 ASIA-PACIFIC HEAD: Kate Yoneyama
`ASIA-PACIFIC SALES & BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER:Yuki Fujiwara BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
`MANAGER, GREATER CHINA, SINGAPORE:Gloria To Tel: +852 2811 7191
`INDIA: Vikas Chawla Tel: #91 1242881057 (v.chawla@nature.com)
`
`display@natureny.com
`
`display@natureasia.com
`
`naturejobs@nature.com
`
`412 | NATURE | VOL 480 | 22/29 DECEMBER 2011
`
`:
`
`
`NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP OFFICES
`LONDON:The Macmillan Building,4Crinan Street, London N1 9XW Tel: +44 (0)20 7833
`4000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7843 4596/7
`BASINGSTOKE;Nature Publishing Group, Subscriptions, Brunel Road, Basingstoke, Hants
`RG21 6XS, UK Tel: +44 (0)1256 329242
`WASHINGTON DC:968National Press Building, 529 14th St NW, Washington DC 20045-
`1938 Tel: +1 202 737 2355
`NEW YORK:75 Varick St, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10013-1917 Tel: +1 212 726 9200
`BOSTON: 25First Street, Suite 104, Cambridge, MA 02141 Tel: +1 6174759275
`SAN FRANCISCO: 225 BushStreet, Suite 1453, San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: +1415
`403 9027
`MUNICH: Nymphenburger Strasse 14, D-80335 Minchen Tel: +49 89 549057- 13
`PARIS: Moulin de Malicorne, Sainte Maure de Touraine, Paris 37800 Tel: +33 2.47 35 72 15
`TOKYO: Chiyoda Building, 2-37 Ichigaya Tamachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0843 Tel: +81
`3 3267 8751
`INDIA: Nature Publishing Group, 3A, 4th Floor, DLF Corporate Park, Gurgaon 122002 Tel:
`+91 124 2881053/54
`
`Nature® (ISSN 0028-0836)is published by Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan
`Publishers Ltd (The Macmillan Building, 4 Crinan Street, London N19XW). Registered as 2
`newspaperat the British Post Office. North and South American orders to subscriptions@
`natureny.com (Tel: +1 866 363 7860). Other orders to subscriptions@nature.com (Tel. +44
`(0)1256 329242; Fax +44 (0)1256 812358). Authorization to photocopy material for internal
`or personal use, orinternal or personal use of specific clients,is granted by Nature to libraries
`and others registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting
`Service, provided the relevant copyrightfee is paid direct to CCC, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers
`MA 01923, USA.Identification code for Nature: 0028-0836/03. CPC PUB AGREEMENT
`#40032744.In the US, Nature (ISSN 0028-0836) is published weekly on Thursday, except
`the last week in December by Nature Publishing Group, 75 Varick St, 9th Fl, New York NY
`10013-1917, USA. USPeriodicals postage paid at New York NY, and additional mailing post
`offices. US POSTMASTER: send address changes to Nature, Subscription Dept, 75 Varick St,
`9th Fl, New York NY 10013-1917, USA. Published in Japan by NPG Nature Asia-Pacific,
`Chiyoda Building, 2-37 Ichigayatamachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0843, Japan. © 2011
`Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved,
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`doi:10.1038/nature10673
`
`Cancer immunotherapy comesof age
`
`Ira Mellman!, George Coukos? & Glenn Dranoff?
`
`Activating the immunesystem for therapeutic benefit in cancer has long been a goal in immunology and oncology. After
`decadesofdisappointment,the tide has finally changed due to the success of recent proof-of-concept clinical trials. Most
`notable has beenthe ability of the anti-CTLA4 antibody, ipilimumab, to achieve a significant increase in survival for
`patients with metastatic melanoma, for which conventional therapies havefailed. In the context of advances in the
`understanding of how tolerance, immunity and immunosuppression regulate antitumour immuneresponses together
`with the adventof targeted therapies, these successes suggest that active immunotherapy representsa path to obtain a
`durable and long-lasting response in cancerpatients.
`
`
`
`BOX|
`Established immune treatments
`
`
`
`T he passive transfer of anticancer monoclonal antibodies and
`
`donorT cells in the context of allogeneic bone marrow trans-
`plantationare effective treatments for a variety ofhaematological
`and solid malignancies'. Although not always thoughtofas ‘immuno-
`therapy’, the successofthese biotherapeutics probably reflects the ability
`of the donor cells or antibodies to induce an immediate immune
`reaction against
`the cancer, bypassing the requirement
`to activate
`endogenous immunity. These immune treatments have been well-
`established in oncology for several decades, and continued advances
`in antibody and T-cell engineering should further enhancetheir clinical
`impact in the years to come (Box1).
`In contrast to these passive immunotherapy strategies, the active
`stimulation ofspecific and durable antitumour immunity has proved
`elusive. In 1891, William Coley, a young New York surgeon, began
`intratumoral injections oflive or inactivated Streptococcus pyogenes
`and Serratia marcescens in an effort to reproduce the spontaneous
`remissions of sarcomas observed in rare-cancer patients who had
`developed erysipelas*. Given Elie Metchnikoff’'s contemporaneous work
`demonstrating the immunesystem’s ability to cause inflammation and
`destroy invading bacteria, ‘Coley’s toxins’ made sense by acting to
`stimulate antibacterial phagocytes that might kill bystander tumour
`cells. Some significant responses were recorded over the ensuing 40
`years, but successes were sporadic, difficult
`to reproduce and not
`obtainedin a scientifically rigorous fashion. Superficial bladder cancer
`was one notable exception, for which the intravesical injection oflive
`bacillus Calmette-Guerin after surgical resection was shownto prolong
`patient survival’. Otherthanthis particularclinical setting, the approach
`was never embraced by oncologists who continued to rely on surgery
`and, increasingly, oneffective new methods, such as radiation therapy
`and ultimately chemotherapy. Coley’s strategy was further discounted
`dueto the very real risks associated with the administration ofinfectious,
`orat least pyrogenic, agents to already weakened cancerpatients; thisis
`ironic given the trauma associated with the treatments that did come
`into common use. Thus began the history of cancer immunotherapy.
`Before continuing, however,it is useful to summarize what must happen
`to elicit a protective immuneresponseto cancer, and why overcoming
`these barriers has been so difficult.
`
`Nine monoclonal antibodies targeting six cancer-associated
`proteins (Her2/neu, EGFR, VEGF, CD20, CD52 and CD33) are
`approvedfor the treatment of solid and haematological
`malignancies. In addition to antagonizing oncogenic pathways,
`these biotherapeutics may act by opsonizing tumour cells and
`triggering their death or removal by antibody-dependent cellular
`cytotoxity or phagocytosis**. Ongoing investigations in murine
`models and patients raise the possibility that they may also
`stimulate adaptive immune responses in some settings®®.
`Recently, the successful conjugation of toxins to antibodies has
`been achieved, and these have induceda clinical response in
`patients who are refractory to the naked antibody®®. The
`concurrent administration of immunostimulatory cytokines such
`as IL-2 and GM-CSF may also enhancethe efficacy of antibody
`therapy.
`Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and the infusion of
`donor lymphocytes can be a highly effective therapy for some
`leukaemias and lymphomas. The graft-versus-leukaemia effects
`involve the direct killing of tumour cells by donor lymphocytes,
`together with the subsequent induction of broader innate and
`adaptive reactions. On the basis of these clinical benefits, many
`groups are exploring the use of adoptive T-cell therapy in the
`autologous setting. Promising strategies include the use of
`lymphodepletion before T-cell infusion, and the engineering of
`new T-cell specificities with CARs?’.
`Other immune treatments that have received the FDA approval
`include recombinant cytokines, such as IL-2 (Proleukin), which is used
`for melanoma and renal cell cancer. Response rates are low (~15%)
`and the significant risk of serious systemic inflammation requires
`administration as an in-patient. Interferon-« is another agent that
`gained approval for ‘immunological cancers’(that is, melanoma or
`renal cell cancer). Although also associated with low response rates
`and high-dosetoxicity, a small subset of melanomapatients, who are
`also predisposed to autoimmunity, has been shown to exhibit an
`impressive survival response™. It has been, however,difficult to pre-
`Generating anticancer immunity is a multistep challenge
`identify these patients, which limits the use of the approach. Yet, when
`Based on our current understanding of the immune response, there
`seen, responsesare durable, suggesting they reflect active antitumour
`are three distinct steps that must be achieved, either spontaneously or
`immunity.
`therapeutically, to mounteffective antitumour immunity (Fig. 1). To
`
`
`
`
`‘Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco,California 94080, USA. “Ovarian Cancer Research Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
`*Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Vaccine Center, Dana-Farber CancerInstitute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
`
`480 | NATURE | VOL 480 | 22/29 DECEMBER 2011
`
`

`

`
`
`immunization
`Antigen
`
`processing
`
`
`Dendritic
`Antigen
`
`cells
`uptake
`responses.
`
`Tumour
`Cytotoxic
`
`antigen
`T call
`
`
`Dendritic cell
`maturation
`
`Sie a
`
`‘orevESE
`
`ectopically on the plasma membrane (for example, calreticulin) that
`promote their phagocytosis, possibly enabling the presentation oftumour
`antigens on major histocompatibility complex (MHC)classI andclass II
`molecules. Some forms of chemotherapy or targeted therapy may pro-
`mote a more immunogenic phenotype’.
`Next,
`in lymphoid organs, tumour-antigen-loaded dendritic cells
`must generate protective T-cell responses’. The precise type of T-cell
`response needed is unknown, but they certainly include the production
`of CD8* effector T cells with cytotoxic potential. Dendritic cells may
`also trigger antibody andnaturalkiller (NK) ornatural killer T (NKT)-
`cell responses, which may contribute to tumour immunity. The lymph
`node is a second potential site for therapeutic intervention, providing
`agents that may help guide the T-cell response. However,the dendritic
`cells are again key players because they must have been matured by a
`stimulatory adjuvant to have a chanceateliciting the desired T cells.
`Presentation of antigens by dendritic cells at the steady state (thatis,
`dendritic cells that have notreceived an immunogenic maturation signal)
`promotes tolerance by regulatory T cell (T,.g) production'’, which
`would oppose an antitumour response.
`
`22/29 DECEMBER 2011 / VOL 480 | NATURE | 481
`
`Figure 1 | Generation and regulation of antitumour immunity.
`BOX 2
`Understanding the events in generating and regulating antitumour immunity
`Mechanismsof immunesuppression
`suggestsatleast three sites for therapeutic intervention: promoting the antigen
`presentation functionsof dendritic cells, promoting the production of
`Tumours escape immuneattack by a variety of complementary
`protective T-cell responses and overcoming immunosuppressionin the tumour
`mechanisms of immunosuppression, many of which operate in
`bed. Antitumour immune responses must begin with the capture of tumour-
`associated antigens by dendritic cellls, either delivered exogenously or captured
`parallel. Among paracrine mediators, adenosine, prostaglandin E2,
`from dead or dying tumourcells. The dendritic cells process the captured
`TGF-f and VEGF-A exert multiple direct and indirect
`antigen for presentation or cross-presentation on MHCclass I] andclass |
`immunosuppressive activities. These mediators may function in the
`molecules, respectively, and migrate to draining lymph nodes. If capture and
`suppression of dendritic cells, indirectly inhibiting T-cell penetration
`presentation occurredin the presence ofan immunogenic maturation stimulus,
`into the tumour bed or directly suppressing effector T-cell activation
`dendritic cells willelicit anticancer effector T-cell responsesin the lymph node;
`while enhancing the function of T,., cells. For example, adenosine,
`if no such stimulus wasreceived, dendritic cells will instead induce tolerance
`which is released by tumour cells under hypoxia, contributes to the
`leading to T-cell deletion, anergy or the productionofT,,, cells. In the lymph
`suppression T-cell-activation and T,eg expansion. VEGF-A can also
`node,antigen presentationto T cellswill elicit a response depending onthe type
`of dendritic cell maturation stimulus received and on the interaction of T-cell
`suppress proper T-celldevelopmentand function: VEGF-A treatmentof
`co-stimulatory molecules with their surface receptors on dendritic cells. Thus,
`mouse splenocytes during T-cell stimulation was shown to induce IL-
`interaction of CD28 or OX40 with CD80/86 or OX40L will promotepotentially
`10 production fromTcells while suppressing IFN-y production®?.
`protective T-cell responses, while interaction of CTLA4 with CD80/86 or PD-1
`Tumour cells can also directly escape T-cell recognition by
`with PD-L1/PD-L2will suppress T-cell responses, and possibly promote T,.g
`downregulating MHC class| or by disabling other components of the
`formation. Antigen-educated T cells (along with B cells and NK cells) will exit
`antigen processing machinery. Shedding of soluble NKG2D ligands
`the lymph node and enterthe tumourbed, where a host of immunosuppressive
`such as MIC-A or MIC-B can severely compromisethe ability of effector
`defence mechanismscan be produced by tumours(orinfiltrating myeloid cells)
`T cells to function in the tumour microenvironment.In addition, tumour
`that oppose effector T-cell function. These include the upregulation of PD-L1/
`cells may upregulate surface ligands, which mediate T-cell anergy (or
`L2 onthe cancercell surface, release of PGE2, arginase and IDO (all T-cell
`exhaustion), including PD-L1 and other ligands to inhibitory T-cell
`suppressors), and the release of VEGF(triggered in part by intratumoral
`receptors. A variety of leukocyte subsets infiltrating tumours are also
`hypoxia), which inhibits T-cell diapedesis from the vasculature, and thus
`infiltration into the tumourbed.
`able to suppress T-cell function. In addition to T,eg cells (the
`accumulation of which in tumours correlates with poor prognostic
`outcome'*), other suppressive lymphocyte subsets have been
`initiate immunity, dendritic cells must sample antigens derived from the
`reported including IL-10 producing B cells and B regulatory cells, typell
`tumour, which canbe ingested in situ or delivered exogenouslyas part of
`NKTcells, NK cells and 76Tcells. Myeloid lineage cells also promote
`a therapeutic vaccine. These antigens might reflect one or moreof the
`immune suppression in tumours. Among these are mainly the poorly
`many mutatedproteins that are typical of cancer, the products of non-
`understood myeloid-derived suppressorcells (MDSC)!™. Their
`mutated genes that are preferentially expressed by cancercells (for
`characterization is ultimately based ontheir ability to suppress T and
`example, cancer-testis antigens), or differentiation antigens associated
`NK cell activation, probably through several mechanismsincluding
`with the cancer’stissue of origin, but against which thymic or peripheral
`nitric oxide, reactive oxidative species, arginase,IL-10 and TGF-f; there
`tolerance has not been completely established (for example, melanosome-
`are also reports that MDSCs mayspecifically induce the expansionof
`associated proteins in melanoma)**. Onantigen encounter, the dendritic
`Treg cells. Tumourstroma cells have an importantimmune modulatory
`cells would also haveto receive a suitable activation (‘maturation’) signal,
`role. The so-called cancer-associatedfibroblasts can promote the
`allowing them to differentiate extensively to promote immunity as
`recruitment and function of immunosuppressivecells through the
`opposed to tolerance including enhanced processing and presentation
`secretion of CCL2 and CXCL12.In addition, they can suppresseffector
`of tumour-antigen-derived peptides*’. Activation signals could be
`T-cells through secretion of TGF-f. Finally, myeloid-derived
`therapeutically supplied exogenously (for example, Toll-like receptor
`mesenchymal stem cells exert important immunosuppressive
`(TLR) ligands or agonist antibodies against activating receptors such as
`functions by blockingproliferation and function of T effectorcells.
`CD40) or endogenously: dying or necrotic tumourcells release factors
`Further study is needed to determine which of these mechanisms are
`(for example, high mobility group proteins or ATP) that are thought to
`most important in general, and which determine the immune status in
`result in the immunogenic maturation of dendritic cells. In addition,
`tumourcells seem to express resident endoplasmic reticulum proteins
`
`individual patients.
`
`

`

`REVIEW
`
`
`
`minimal therapeutic benefits. Recently, however, the co-administration
`Finally, cancer-specific T cells must enter the tumour bed to perform
`ofinterleukin (IL)-2 as an immunestimulantwith a short peptide derived
`their function at which point immunesuppression becomesa challenge
`from glycoprotein 100 (gp100), a melanocyte differentiation antigen,
`(Box 2). Tumours may (presumably by skewing dendritic cell matura-
`was shown, under someconditions, to augment tumour responses and
`tion) prevent immunization, trigger the ‘wrong’ immune response or
`enable the local accumulation or expansion of T,.g cells that would
`prolong progression-free survival compared with IL-2 alone in advanced
`oppose the activity of effector T cells. Indeed,infiltration of T,.. cells
`melanomapatients’. These findings indicate that increasing immune
`correlates with poor prognosisin a variety ofepithelial tumourtypes'""’.
`activation with peptide vaccines is a critical step for improving thera-
`Tumours may downregulate their expression of MHCclass I molecules
`peutic efficacy.
`or their expression of target tumour antigens and can also produce a
`Because the importance and function of dendritic cells in stimulating
`variety of surface molecules (for example, PD-L1 or PD-L2)that engage
`T-cell responses is now well known, current vaccine trials are designed
`receptors on the surfaces of activated T cells (PD-1), causing T-cell
`morerationally. One potentially promising approach involves the use of
`anergy or exhaustion'®’’. Expression of such suppressive ligands can
`peptides (~20-mer) that are somewhatlongerthan those that bind to MHC
`be associated with oncogenic mutations seen in many cancers (for
`class I molecules (10-12-mer). In the presence of a suitable dendritic-cell-
`example, PTEN loss)'*. Additionally, tumours can release immuno-
`activating adjuvant, these peptides are thought to be moreefficient at
`suppressive molecules, such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO),

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket