throbber
Mucosal immunology
`
`FOCUS
`
`Ris vaaove wD
`
`june 2008 volume8 no. 6
`www.nature.com/reviews
`
`_ Collaborate
`
`[Genome&Go.v. Univ. ofChicago
`m™PGR2019-00002
`UNIV. CHICAGO EX. 2008
`
`‘Lh A
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`=| IBRARY OF
`
`[NATIONALY
`
`,
`we
`,
`penncaceleeelacie eeas
`
`rex rele
`
`Maintaining the inflammation—
`peare
`
`

`

`
`
`Dendritic-celltolerance versusimmunity p435
`
`CONTENTS
`

`
`REVIEWS
`Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal
`bacteria and maintenanceof immune
`homeostasis in the gut
`David Artis
`It was thought thatintestinal epithelial cells
`functionedsolely as a barrier to the external
`environment, butas described here, these cells are
`now knownto have anintegralrole in facilitating and
`controlling crosstalk between commensal bacteria
`ancl the immune system.
`The regulation of IgA class switching
`Andrea Cerutti
`IgA is the most abundant antibody class andprovides a
`first line of defence at mucosalsurfaces. Class switching
`tolgA occurs throughboth T-cell-dependent and T-cell-
`andrecentstudiesreveal a role
`independent pathways,
`onses.
`for commensalbacteriain intestinal IgA resp
`Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation
`Janine L. Coombes and Fiona Powrie
`A delicate balance betweentolerance to commensal
`bacteria and immunity to pathogens occurs In the
`intestine. Intestinal dendritic cells have a central
`as described
`role in maintainingthis balance and,
`here, someof the molecular pathways involvedhave
`recently been resolved.
`
`FEATURED
`ARTICLE
`
`_ Setting the stage: host invasion by HIV
`© | Florian Hladik and M.Juliana McElrath
`Infection by HIV requires the virus to breach the
`mucosalbarrier to gain access to the immunecells
`that it infects. But what are the immediate events that
`follow HIV exposure at genital mucosal sites and what
`are the key cells thatfacilitate HIV invasion?
`
`The genetics and immunopathogenesisof
`inflammatory boweldisease
`Judy H. Cho
`Great progress has been made recently in the
`identification of genes or genetic loci that are associated
`with inflammatory boweldiseases. This knowledgeis
`now providing insight into the pathogenesis of these
`diseases, highlightingroles for genes involvedin
`bacterial sensing andcytokine signalling.
`
`_ Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the tumour
`microenvironment
`Weiping Zou and Lieping Chen
`This Review describes how the expression of inhibitory
`members of the B7 family, particularly B7-H1 and B7-H4,
`by cancercells, stromalcells and haematopoieticcells
`inthe tumour microenvironment is regulated and acts
`to inhibit -eell immunity, as well as the therapeutic
`implications.
`
`PowerPoint figures
`Links to further information
`On the web www.nature,com/reviews/immunol
`
`Figures can be downloadedas a PowerPointfile for
`Thefull text of articles includes:
`usein presentations and for teaching,
`
`* Author biographies
`Advance online publication
`E-alert table of contents
`« Links to glossary terms
`
`anadvanceonline publication (AQP) service for authors and
`We operate
`saa
`i
`reade
`5
`* Links to genes andproteins in databases such as
`of print.
`Get monthly e-mail alerts to the content of this
`*aders to viewthe latest articles published online ahead
`
`Entrez, FlyBase, OMIM and UniProtKB.
`journal — sent FREE to your inbox—by
`
`Forthcomingarticles
`registeringonline. Or sign up to receivethe
`Ata glance provides a bullet-pointed summary
`Deubiquitylationanc regulation of the immune respons
`latest content as an R55 newsfeed by visiting
`of the main topics c overedin eacharticle,
`Sheter-¢ ong Sun
`weew.nature.com/reviews/immunal
`More articleslike this for further reading.
`How regulatory T cells work
`
`Each Review concludes with a ‘Morearticles like
`Dario A.A, Vignali, Lauren W, Collison and Creq J. Workman
`
`this’ box containinglinks to related content on NPG.
`Unravelling the association of partial Fcell immunodeficiency
`
`Mimune dysregulation
`Fe atured article can be browsedonline by
`
`Adrian Liston, Owen M. Siggs and Anselm Enders
`registered members of nature.com.
`
`Online correspondence [<]
`Comments fram readers about our articles.
`All correspondencewill be highlighted onthe table
`of contents and on e-mail alerts. See p4bb
`
`aril
`
`N
`NATUREREVIEWS| IMMUNOLOGY
`
`This material was copied
`at the NLM and may be
`
`VOLUME 8 | JUNE 2008
`
`

`

`FOCUS ON
`MUCOSAL
`IMMUNOLOGY
`This issue features a focus on
`mucosal immunology — see the
`articles markedwith the above
`logo. Thesearticles can also be
`foundonline, alongwith articles
`on mucosal immunology from our
`Past issues and from other Nature
`Publishing Groupjournals at:
`http://www.nature.com/nri/
`
`focus/mucosal
`
`How HIV invades p447
`
`nature
`REVIEWS
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`FROM THE EDITORS
`An editorial commentary andintroductionto this month's issue
`RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS
`Selected highlights from the recent research literature
`
`PERSPECTIVES
`OPINION
`
`Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive,
`regulatorsof immunity
`StephenJ. Galli, Michele Grimbaldeston andMindyTsai
`In this Opinionartic le, StephenGalli andcolleagues discuss the
`as well as positive,
`recent evidence that mast cells can have negative,
`immunomodulatory func tions, and suggest that mast ¢ ells might have
`phasesof an immuneresponse.
`distinct rolesat different
`T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for
`vaccine design (Corrigendum)
`Robert A. Seder, Patric ia A. Darrah and Mario Roederer
`
`4H?
`
`v
`
`oD
`
`In
`It
`
`et
`
`
`
`hc) iHHHF
`
`
`
`New York, mid-Atlantic, South East:
`
`Jim Bre
`Tel +1
`+1 212
`726 9481
` 772609394; Fas:
`Midwest: Mike
` 44)
`Pax +) 212 696 9481
`Tel: +1212 726 98
`West Coast south:
`George
`Lui
`Tel
`475 78) $804: Fax:
`
`West Coast north:
`Shaver
`el: 61415 781 6422; Fax: 41415 741 3805
`UK, Ireland, France, Belgium, Eastern Europe:
`det
`
`417415 781 4405
`
`&T
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DISPLAY ADVERTISING
`jlayaraturenny.t om(USA)or
`
`isplayainature.c
`
`
`al Head of Display Advertising:
`
`Michael
`
`
`Tel: +44 (0) 20 7843 4960;
`Japan: naturednature|pot
`
`Kate Yoneyara, Ken Mikary
`Fax: 44 (0) 20 7843 4749
`ip,
`Tel: +813
`5765; Fax:+81 3
`i267
`tublishing Gr
`
`
`
`k Street, Sth floor,
`Greater China, Singapore:
` CUSTOMER SERV
`DISPLAY ACCOUNT MANAGERS
` Lageispat
`
`013-1917, USA.
`vfices
`Gh
`lo
`New England:
`6171979
`h
`Ts
`tional mailing ¢
`Sheila Reard
`POSTMASTER:Pe
`N
`
`1212 776-9200; Fax: +1217 696-9006
`Tel
`
`? 852 PSLIOF44
`
`tion Department,
`Tele) 617 1994008: Fax 416174263717
`
`1,1N y7oz4 5161, U5.
`VOLUME 8|JUNE 2008
`
`
`
`DISCOUNT SUBSCRIPTIONS
`STUDENTS! Dit
`stuibys
`
`bust 45 (USS$O0/ER4)2 ¢
`print and online
`
`subscriptions
`ar
`ersonal and
`ert
`stabs
`
`
`Www. nature

`:
`SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
`
` WilSSN 1471-17 FS)by i + Py
`
`yg Group
`
`
`
`n Building,
`ie
`Editorial office
`
`hinan Street, Lar
`VW, LIK.
`
`78443679
`Tel: +44 (02
`
`
`
`sRG21 6X5, UK
`
`
`om
`q Co. Lid,
`
`
`E-mail
`‘oda-ku, Tokyo tot,
`Jone

`
`k
`
`Anr
`ba$450 (pe
`
`sr
`i
`
` aRTOO1; Eure
`
`SITE LICENCES
`
`Site lit
`contacts:
`
`Americas:
`
`E-mail: institu
`44267 8769
`
`
`lureny.comm
`Asia Pacific:
`le
`E-mail:
`invstitution
`Australia and New Zealand:
`
`macmillancoma
`Tet: +61 39825
`1160
`E-mail: nature
`India: Te
`
`
`
`E-mail: institutions@ine ire.com
`
`ws Tracing
`
`
`
`ame, Chiyoda kta,
`uecho Leche
`
`795, All
`
`
`NATURE REVIEWS|[IMMUNOLOGY
`This aah tt <-3i5e
`
`

`

`FROM THE EDITORS
`
`atch out gastroenterologists! Many immunologists are
`now turning their attention to the study of immune
`responses at mucosal sites. Mucosal immunologyis
`attractive for several reasons. Mucosal surfaces comprise
`the body’sfirst line of defence against numerous pathogenic organisms.
`And understanding how the mucosal immunesystem is typically able to
`distinguish pathogens from the commensal microflora and innocuousfood
`antigens and respond appropriately to each challenge is a fascinating
`conundrum. When the mucosal immunesystem fails to discriminate between
`good and bad, the consequences — such as inflammatory boweldisease and
`food allergy — can be devastating. Exciting research is now providing clues
`to the inner workings of the mucosal immune system, and the harnessing
`of its unusual features to prevent or treat disease shows promisefor the
`developmentof new mucosal vaccines, adjuvants and immunotherapeutics.
`Five articles in this issue review the latest developmentsin thefield
`of mucosal immunology. David Artis assigns renewed importance to the
`ons ofintestinal epithelial cells. Janine Coombes and Fiona Powrie
`functi
`dissect the role of dendritic cellsin intestinal immune regulation. Andrea
`Cerutti details the regulation of IgA, the body's most abundant antibody
`class. Judy Cho draws onlessonslearnt from genome studies to understand
`inflam matory bowel diseases, and Florian Hladik and Juliana McElrath
`cover the invasion of genital mucosal sites by HIV.
`The importanceofthis fast-growingfield is also illustrated by the recent
`partnership between the Society for Mucosal Immunology and the Nature
`Publishing Group in the productionof the new journal Mucosal Immunology.
`e Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies (FOCIS) and
`Finally, we thank th
`BeckmanCoulter for supporting this Focusissue.
`
`Nature
`
`@®Mucosal inmunolayy
`
`REVIEWS
`
`» COVER: ‘Ry
`llections on mucosal immunology’.
`by Si
`I ‘s f he Bradbrook. € Jriginal image courtesy of
`Mid Artis (dartis@vet.upenn.edu).
`
`ELAINE HELL
`
`‘Ye
`
`Ck
`LUCY BIRD
`
`&
`
`OLIVE LEAVY
`
`>)
`
`aKIRSTY MINTON
`
` &
`ASARAH ALLAN
`
`EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS: Laura [rian
`Jacques Smit
`WEB PRODUCTION MANAGER, UK:
`Alexander Thurrell
`MARKETING MANAGERS: Tim Redding.
`Leah Rodriquez
`MANAGEMENT OFFICES
`LONDON nature@nature.cont
`The Macmillan Building,
`4Crinan Street
`London NI OX,| IK
`Tel: 44 (O20 7833 4000;
`Fax: +44 (020 1843 4590/7
`amnpo
`lena Skipper
`OFFICE MANAGER: Sheryl Or
`heoombe
`ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER: Magda
`MANAGING DIRECTOR: Steven Ine
`£ PUBLICATIONS:
`EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, NATUR
`Philip Campbell
`ASSOCIATE DIRECTORS:
`lenny Henderson, Tony Rudland
`EDITORIAL PRODUCTION DIRECTOR:
`James McQuat
`
`PRODUCTION DIRECTOR:
`Ywonne Strong
`DIRECTOR, WEB PUBLISHING:
`Time Hannay
`HEAD OF WEB PRODUCTION:
`Jereny Mac donald
`NEW YORK nature@inatureny.com
`Nature Publishing Group,
`75 Varick Street,
`Oth floor, New York.
`NY 10013-1917, USA
`Tel: +1 212 726 9200,
`Faxt 41 712 696 9000
`CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER:
`Howard Ratner
`DIRECTOR OF NEW TECHNOLOGY:
`Grey Suprock
`HEAD OF WEB SERVICES:
`Anthony Barrera
`NATUREJOBS PUBLISHER: Ben Crowe
`HEAD OF NATURE RESEARCH & REVIEWS
`MARKETING:Sara Girard
`
`TOR YO natureqinatureasia.com
`Chiyoda Building SF, 2-37-1 Ichigayatanachi
`Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0544, Japan
`Tel: +81 3 3267 8751; Fox: +81 2 3207 8740
`ASIA-PACIFIC PUBLISHER: Antoine E Bocaumt
`MANAGER: Koichi Nakanura
`ASIA-PACIFIC SALES DIRECTOR:
`Kate Yoneyama
`SENIOR MARKETING MANAGER:
`Peter Yoshihara
`MARKETING/PRODUCTION MANAGER:
`Takesh Murakani
`INDIA SA/T? Ansari Road, Daryqar),
`New Delhi 110 002, India
`Tel/Fax: #91 11 2324 4186
`SALES AND MARKETING MANAGER, INDIA:
`Harpal Singh Gill
`Copyright © 2008 Nature Publishing Group
`Research Highlight images courtesyof
`Getty Images unless othervise credited,
`Printed in Wales by Cambrian Printers
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and may be
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`VOLUME 8 | JUNE 2008 | 399
`
`EL
`
`onTORIAL OFFICES
`he Mie NatureReviews@natuire.com
`Landon A Building,
`4 Crinan Street,
`Tel:
`1 9XW, UK
`Faas 944at 3620
`TOO F849 3629
`
`SENIOR sae, EDITOR:Lucy Bired
`Mstclgmrnett Minton, Olive Leavy
`CopyEpiTo >ITOR: Sarah Allan
`ART Eorra:
`fe Marta Tulet
`EDITORIA R: Simon Bradbrook
`Ninor Fay i SUPPORT MANAGER:
`i
`ier
`SENGROLLER:SusanneHi
`Patrick Mi
`T EDITORS: Vicky Askew,
`MANAGI rqar,
`NG PRODUCTION EDITOR:
`hadith
`Shadwell
`DEPUT Y PRODU
`'
`Sittimee
`PRODUC TION CONTROLLER: Natalie Smith)
`
`NATU
`
`;
`RE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY
`
`

`

`
`
` This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`REVIEWS
`
`Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the
`tumour microenvironment
`
`Weiping Zou* and Lieping Chen‘
`Abstract | The B7 family consists of activating andinhibitory co-stimulatory molecules that
`positively and negatively regulate immuneresponses. Recentstudies have shown that human
`and rodentcancercells, and stromal cells and immunecells in the cancer microenvironment
`upregulate expressionof inhibitory B7 molecules andthat these contribute to tumour immune
`evasion.In this Review, we focusontheroles of these B7 molecules in the dynamic interactions
`between tumoursandthe host immunesystem,including their expression, regulation and
`functionin the tumour microenvironment. Wealso discuss novel therapeutic strategies that
`target these inhibitory B7 molecules andtheir signalling pathways to treat human cancer.
`
`|
`
`Tumour-associated antigens
`We) Fees Mal are
`Anressed Oy tumour cell
`These bolone lo
`three marr
`
` Halon anilipens, WHICH
`Isc-exnressed by non
`int Cells; mutated or
` Ind Cancer LEShs
`
`
`Hole placenta
`
`Myeloid-derived suppressor
`cells
`A populaticn ¢ Peels (hal
`COMPRMSeCS Mature are
`Himaluire myeloid cells They
`wee panded andor activated
`CUP an iiternenalory
`TUNG FeSporse: Through
`
`er
`
`retoed comoaner
`\
`
`Is, they
`
`* Department of Surgery,
`University of Michigan, Ann
`Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
`‘Departments of Dermatology
`and Oncology. Jolins Hopkins
`University School of Medicine,
`Baltimore, Maryland 21241,
`USA,
`e-mails: wzou@med, umich
`edu, Ichen4? @jhmi_edu
`dor de Aerie 426
`
`Thespecific function of an individual’s immunesystem
`in different physiological and pathological settings is
`regulated by the actions of opposing factors or sys-
`tems. Commonexamples ofthis are the polarization of
`T helper (T,,) cells into T) 1-cell and T,,2-cell subsets
`with opposing functions, and the balance betweeneffec-
`tor T-cell activation and regulatory T-cell activation. At
`the molecularlevel, co-stimulatory membersofthe B7
`family can haveboth inhibitory and stimulatoryeffects
`on T-cell activation.
`An imbalance in immuneregulation profoundly
`affects tumour-specific T-cell immunity in the cancer
`microenvironment andcan reshape tumourprogression,
`metastasis and immunotherapyin patients with cancer’, It
`is well knownthat thelack of naturally induced immunity
`specific for turnour-associated antigens (TAAs)is not simply
`a passive process wherebyadaptive immunityis shielded
`fromdetecting TAAs! °, [thas beenclearly shownthat the
`tumourmicroenvironmentis comprisedofdysfunctional
`immune cells that are reprogrammedbyactive tumour-
`mediated processes to evade tumour-specific immunityin
`a highly effective manner. Three important mediators of
`this evasion of tumour immunitythat have been identi-
`fied in the tumour microenvironmentare: dysfunctional
`antigen-presentingcells (APCs), including dendritic cells
`0
`(DCs), macrophages!"
`and mycloid-derived suppressor
`cells!’ ;epulatory F(T, cells"; and highlevels ofexpres-
`sion ofinhibitory B7 molecules by APCs, stromalcells and
`tumour cells!”. Thefirst two mediators have been spe-
`cifically reviewedin theliterature elsewhere’ WEE Th this
`Review, we focus on inhibitory B7 molecules, and detail
`their expression, regulation, function and therapeutic
`relevance in the tumour microenvironment.
`
`Inhibitory B7 molecules
`T-cell activation andtolerance are not chance occur-
`rences. Many molecules form an orchestrated system to
`regulate theinteractions between APCs andTcells. This
`interactionis explained bythe two signal model, whereby
`signal oneis providedtothe T-cell receptorofT cells by
`the presentationofspecific antigens on MHC molecules
`expressed by APCs, andsignal two is provided bythe B7
`family andother co-stimulatory molecules that APCs
`use to direct and/orfine-tune T-cell responses (HG.
`1).
`‘Thegrowing B7 family now comprises seven members,
`which are CD80(also knownas B7.1), CD86(also known
`as B7.2), B7-DC (also known as PD-L2 or CD273),
`B7-H1 (also known as PD-L1 or CD274), B7-H2 (also
`known as ICOSL), B7-H3 (also known as CD276) and
`B7-H4(also knownas B7S1 or B7x)'"
`“. Compelling
`evidenceindicates that B7 molecules not only provide
`crucial positivesignals to stimulate andsupport ‘T-cell
`activation, but canalso offer negative signals that control
`andsuppress T-cell responses! '*, Thesenegativesignals
`are largely provided by the newlyidentified B7-family
`members B7-H1 and B7-H4.
`
`CD80/CD86-CTLA4, CD80 and CD86control T-cell
`activation by binding to and signalling through two
`receptors, CD28 andcytotoxic Tlymphocyte antigen 4
`(CTLAA), that are expressed by T cells (FG 1), CD80
`and CD86arenotclassically consideredas inhibitory
`B7 molecules. However, on ‘T-cell activation, the expres-
`sion oftheir inhibitory receptor, CTLA4, is induced
`on T cells, and engagement of CTLA4 by CD80 and
`CD86can limit and decrease T-cell activation. The
`role of CTLA4 in controlling ‘T-cell activation andits
`
`NATURE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and may be
`
`VOLUME 8 | JUNE 2008 | 467
`
`

`

`REVIEWS
`
`T cell
`
`co28
`
`cpss Ceo ———¥
`
`of=D crim
`
`TCR
`
`SS ORE) PD
`BHI (ao =~» ewe) cv20
`IcOs
`
`\gV-like domain
`
`\gC-like domain
`
`Figure 1| The B7 family and antigen presentation to
`T cells. Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) or APC-like cells
`present a specific antigen on MHCmolecules to the T-cell
`receptor (TCR) of T cells. Members of the B7 family and
`other co-stimulatory molecules are usedto direct and/or
`fine-tuneT-cell responses. The newly identified B7-H1
`and B7-H4 molecules provide negative signals that
`control andsuppress T-cell responses, Human tumour
`cells and tumour-associated APCs expresslimitedlevels
`of the stimulatory B7-family members CD80 and CD86,
`and highlevels of the inhibitory B7-family members
`B7-H1 and B7-H4.This imbalance between the expression
`of stimulatory andinhibitory B7 molecules might
`contribute to tumour immune evasion in the tumour
`
`microenvironment. CTLA4; cytotoxic T-lymphocyte
`antigen 4; COS, inducible Fcell co-stimulator; PD-1,
`programmed cell death1.
`
`therapeutic relevance have been reviewed elsewhere”
`andare not discussed in detail here. CTLA4-specific
`antibodies have recently enteredclinicaltrials for the
`treatment of various human cancers",
`
`B7-H1. B7-H1 was first cloned on the basis of its DNA
`sequence homology to other B7 molecules belonging
`to the immunoglobulin superfamily”. Programmed
`cell death 1 (PD-1; also known as CD279) has been
`subsequently identified as a counter-receptorfor B7-H1
`(REF 21) (HG.
`1), and B7-H1 is therefore also known as
`PD-L1 to emphasize this receptor-ligandinteraction”.
`However, experimental evidence indicates that addi-
`tional counter-receptor(s) other than PD-1 can mediate
`the functions of B7-H1. In the absence of PD-1 or if
`binding to PD-1 is blocked, B7-H1 can have a stimula-
`tory effect on T-cell immunity!" ", Moreover, CD80
`is an additional counter-receptor for B7-H1 for the
`inhibition of T-cell responses”. ‘To make thesituation
`more complicated, B7-H1 canalso functionas a receptor
`to transmit signals into T cells’ and tumour cells”. In
`summary, B7-H1 can act as bothligand andreceptor to
`execute immunoregulatory functions.
`
`Regulatory T (T,nop! Cells
`A T-cell population that can
`lunctionally Suppress an
`Immune response by
`Willuencre tie
`
`of another cell type
`Several phenotypically
`distinct reeulatary Peel
`populations exist The classi
`repulatory T cells are
`CD4°CB25"FOXPS*
`Known as 7,
`cells
`
`T cells
`
`Two-signal model
`The Concept that both the
`MHC-peptide complex
`(Signal 1) and co-stimulatory
`sipnals delivered by BY amily
`molecules expressed by
`
`INMIPEN-preser
`cells
`{signal 2) are required tor Pcell
`activation, The absence of
`Senal? results im the mducnon
`ot TPeell anergy or deletion
`
`Cytotoxic TFlymphocyte-
`antigen 4
` 1ement by
`(CTLAA), Aller enp;
`CD80 or CD86 on antigen
`presenting cells, CTLA4
`sleinalling inactivated T cells
`induces cell cycle arrest,
`decreases CyLOKING Production
`and inhibits Teell responses
`Co4'€D25'
`T,
`cells
`constitutively express CTLAA
`
`B7-H4, B7-H4 was alsoidentified by DNA sequence
`homologyto other B7 molecules* “. B7-H4 remains an
`orphanligand,althoughevidence indicates that a recep-
`tor can be induced and couldfunction on T cells**3""!,
`The currently knownfunctions of B7-H4are exclusively
`inhibitory andtheeffect of B7-H4 might be mediated
`by a single receptor, B- and ‘T-lymphocyte attenuator
`(BTLA) wasinitially proposed to be the receptor for
`B7-H4 (REF %2), but recent studies showthat this is not
`the case and that herpes virus entry mediatoris the
`ligand for BTLA® ©.
`
`Expression pattern
`CD80 and CD86have arestricted expression pattern,
`being expressed mainly by professional APCs and
`haematopoietic cells, but rarely by stromalcells and
`non-haematopoietic cancercells'™*. By contrast,mRNA
`encoding B7-H1 and B7-H4is foundin almostall tissues
`and most stromal and haematopoietic cells. This distri-
`butionpattern indicates uniquefunctions for these mol-
`ecules in both lymphoid and non-lymphoidorgans,
`
`ExpressionofB7-H1. Vhe expression of mRNAencod-
`ing B7-H1 is abundant in manytissues and organs
`2 a
`in humans*"
`and mice*!. A recent study indicates
`that the phosphatase and tensin homologue (P'TEN)-
`phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway might be
`important in the post-transcriptional regulation of
`B7-H1 cell-surface expression in tumours’, B7-H1
`protein is often expressed by activatedcells including
`T cells, B cells, DCs, monocytes/macrophages*!'',
`natural killer (NK) cells, activated vascular endothe-
`lial cells”, mesenchymal stem cells” and cultured bone-
`marrow-derived mast cells". B7-H1 is also found to
`be expressed constitutively in immune-privilegedsites
`including the eyes and placenta’"’, which indicates
`that B7-H1 might inhibit self-reactive T cells or B cells
`andtherefore control inflammatory responses in these
`tissues and organs.
`Most humancancerstestedsofar express highlevels
`of B7-H1 protein™ (TABLE |). However, loworrare B7-H1
`expression is observed in most mouse and human
`tumour-cell lines". This might be owing to the lack
`of the complete cancer microenvironment incell lines
`in vitro as these tumour-cell lines can upregulate B7-H1
`protein expression in responseto cytokines", Another
`possibility, albeit less likely, is that certain molecular
`profiles have been alteredin established tumour-cell
`lines during culture. Therefore, the results obtained
`from established tumour-cell lines in vitro might
`needtobe interpreted carefully. In addition to tumour
`cells, B7-H1 protein expression has been observed
`in human tumour-associated DCs*'"’, fibroblasts"
`and T cells’.
`
`ExpressionofB7-H4, Similar to B7-H1, mRNA encoding
`B7-H4 is widely distributed in peripheral tissues’,
`However, although the expression of B7-H4cell-surface
`protein was detected in normal humanepithelial cells of
`thefemale genital tract, kidney, lung and pancreas, B7-H4
`protein was generally absent in other normal human
`
`468 | JUNE 2008 | VOLUME&
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and may be
`
`www.nature.com/reviews/immunol
`
`

`

`REVIEWS
`
`Refs
`
`36,44,48
`36,44
`
`36,89
`125
`81
`36,44,86
`44
`
`126
`88
`23,36,44,87
`
`Number of B7-H1' T cells correlates with tumour size, stage and HER2! expression
`ND
`
`B7-H1 expression correlates with increased tumoursize, metastasis and poorsurvival
`B7-H1 expression by tumour cells inhibits T-cell activationin vitro
`B7-H1 expression by leukaemia cells has no effect on T-cell activationinvitro
`B7-H1' regionsof the tumour contain fewerT cells in non-smallcell lung cancer
`ND
`
`B7-H1 plasmacells inhibit T-cell activation in vitro
`B7-H1 expressionis associated with poor prognosis
`B7-H1 expression by tumourcells is associated with a decreased numberofT cells in
`the tumour and poor prognosis. B7-H1' tumour-associated dendritic cells inhibit T-cell
`function.
`
`B7-H1 expression by tumourcells is associated with a decreased numberof tumour
`T cells and poor prognosis.
`ND
`
`127
`
`36
`
`44,85,128
`36
`129,130
`
`Table 1
`
`|B7-H1 expression in human cancersandits immunological, clinical and pathological associations*
`B7-H1'* cases/
`Immunological, clinical and pathological associations
`total cases
`
`Human cancer type
`
`Breast cancer
`
`Colon cancer
`
`Gastric cancer
`
`Glioma
`
`Leukaemia
`
`Lung cancer
`Melanoma
`
`Multiple myeloma
`
`Oesophageal cancer
`Ovarian cancer
`
`Pancreatic cancer
`
`Peripheral T-cell lymphoma
`Renal-cell carcinoma
`
`Thymic neoplasm
`Urothelial cancer
`
`24/56
`16/25
`
`45/105
`10/10
`17/30
`86/87
`22/22
`
`82/82
`18/41
`82/93
`
`20/51
`
`7/11
`
`130/196
`28/34
`142/268
`
`B7-H1 expression by tumourcells is associated with poor prognosis
`ND
`B7-H1 expression by tumourcells is associated with advanced stage, recurrence and
`poor survival
`“The data for each tumour type are assembled from more than onereport. Some data have not been includedin the tableifless than 10 tumour samples were
`reported fora particular type of humancancer. ‘HERZ (also known as ERBB2 or Neu)is a tumour-assoc iatedantigenthatis expressedin about 25% of cases of breast
`cancer, Vaccines against HER2 are beingtested for cancer therapy in humans. Monoclonal antibodies specific for HER2 (such as trastuzumab(Herceptin;
`Genentech/Roche)) are approvedfor the therapy of human breast cancer. ND, not determined.
`
`somatic tissues”. Nonetheless one study did observe
`broadcell-surface expression of B7-H4 protein on mouse
`haematopoieticcells”
`. The causeofthis interspecies
`difference is unknown.
`B7-H4is commonly detectable in the human cancer
`microenvironment (TABLE 2), For example, human ovar-
`ian cancersexpress highlevels of B7-H4 protein",
`andlowlevels of soluble B7-H4 protein were foundin
`the sera frompatients with ovarian cancer’’. In addi-
`tion to tumourcells, tumour-infiltrating macrophages"
`and endothelial cells of small blood vessels” in the can-
`cer microenvironmentare also foundto constitutively
`express B7-H4.
`In summary, the current data reveal broad expression
`patterns of B7-H1 and B7-H4protein in human tumours,
`in contrasttotheirrare expressionin normaltissues. These
`dataindicate that post-transcriptional regulation could
`have acrucial role in the control of B7-H1 and B7-H4
`protein expression in normal tissues and organs, and
`that this regulatory mechanismis aberrant in tumours.
`Furtherinvestigation ofthe regulatory mechanisms and
`thesignalling pathways leading to expression of B7-H1
`and B7-H4will generate important informationfor the
`understanding of tumour immuneevasion and provide
`potential molecular targets for treating humancancers.
`
`Regulation of expression
`The tumour microenvironment contains
` a large number of
`'* Someofthese
`cytokines andinflammatory mediators
`molecules can regulate the expression of B7-H1 and B7-H4.
`
`Regulation of B7-H1 expression. B7-H1 expression can
`be induced or maintained by many cytokines**"°", of
`whichinterferon-y (IFNy) is the most potent. Established
`human tumour-cell lines rarely express B7-H1 protein
`onthe cell surface, but high levels of B7-H1 expression
`can be inducedbytreatment with IFNy in most ofthe
`cell lines tested so far". Consistent with this, IFNy can
`induce highlevels of B7-H1 expression by normalepi-
`thelial cells, vascular endothelial cells”, proximal tubular
`epithelialcells” andniyeloid DCs, It is assumedthata
`strong 1, I-cell response can induce B7-H1 expression
`by APCs andothercells through IFNy, andin turn main-
`tain the thresholdofT-cell activationtoavoidtissue and
`organ damage.In addition to IFNy, type LIFN can also
`stimulate B7-H1 expression by hepatocytes", monocytes,
`DCs"! and tumour cells (S. Wei, lL. Kryczek, L. Chen and
`W. Zou, unpublished observations). In this context,after
`virus infection, tumour-associated plasmacytoid DCs
`producelarge amounts oftypeI [PN in vitro®, which
`can in turn induce B7-H1 expression”’. Plasmacytoid
`DCspreferentially induce T,,2-cell responsesincertain
`situations’. Therefore, the expression of B7-H1 could
`potentially be stimulated in both T\,1- andT) 2-cell-
`biased conditions,although the expression andrelevance
`of B7-H1 expressionin T),1- or T,.2-cell-associateddis-
`eases remains to betested.
`In light ofits stimulatory effect on B7-H1 expres-
`sion, IFNy could thus be a ‘double-edged sword’ in
`tumour immunity. Whereas IFNy could increaseanti-
`gen processing and presentation by upregulating the
`
`Myeloid DCs
`Asubset of dendritic cells (DCs)
`that
`are lineage-negative,
`HLA DRUCD I c* (in humans)
`mononuclear cells with a
`Monocyiod appearance,
`Human myeloid DCs might be
`denved fram myeloid
`precursors (lor example,
`monocytes, macrophages ard
`CD 11e! precursors)
`
`Plasmacytoid DCs
`A subset of dendritic cells (DCs)
`thal are lineape nepalive,
`(in Humans)
`HLA-DR CD11
`mononuclear cells with a
`TICPOSCOPIC appearance
`similar to plasmablasts,
`Plasmacyloid BCs are the main
`producers of type Linterteran
`
`AMCTIIDE pie [IMMUNOLOGY
`
`This material was copied
`atthe NLM and may be
`
`VOLUME & | TUNE 2008 | 469
`
`

`

`REVIEWS
`
`Table 2|B7-H4 expression in human cancersandits immunological, clinical and pathological associations*
`B7-H4* cases/
`Immunological, clinical and pathologicalassociations
`Human cancer type
`total cases
`165/173
`240/246
`
`B7-H4 expressionis associatedwithlack of expression of progesterone receptor and HER2!
`ND
`
`Breast cancer (primary)
`Breast canc er
`(metastatic)
`
`Refs
`
`50,54
`50
`
`Lung cancer
`Ovarian cancer
`Prostate carwer
`Renal-cell carcinoma
`
`Uterine endometrioid
`adenocarcinoma
`
`35/86
`202/216
`120/823
`153/259
`90/90
`
`B7-H4 expression is more commonin patients with lymph-node metastasis
`B7-H4* tumour-associated macrophagesinhibit T-cell activation and predict poorsurvival
`B7-H4 expression by tumourcells is associatedwith disease spread, recurrence and death
`B7-H4 expression by tumourcellsis associated with poor survival
`B7-H4 expression by tumourcells is associated with weak F-cellinfiltration andhigh-risk
`tumours
`
`49,131
`31,49,51-55
`90
`56
`132
`
`than one report. Some data have not been includedin the tableif less than 10 tumour samples were
`“Thedata for each tumour type are assembled from more
`reportedfor a particular type of hurman cancer. HER? (also knownas ERBB? or Neu)is a tummour-associatedantigen that is expressed in about 25%of case sal breast
`cancer, Vaccines against HER? are being testedfor cancer therapy in humans, Monoclonal antibodies specific for HER? (such as trastuzumab(Herceptin:
`Genentech/Roche)) are approved for the therapy of humanbreast cancer. ND, not determined.
`
`expression of MHC molecules and components of the
`antigen-processing machinery",theeffects of IFNy on
`B7-H1 expression might downregulate ‘T-cell immu-
`nity. This could explain, at least partially, why IFNy
`has not beeneffective as a therapeutic agent for most
`humancancers. In addition, [FNy has been shownto
`stimulate the expressionofjndoleamine 2, 4-dioxypenase
`(IDO) and arginase®’ * on APCs. Such APCs could
`suppress anti-tumour immuneresponses. Therefore,
`it is not surprising that an increase in the numberof
`TAA-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (¢ “TLs) does not
`always translate into clinical regression of cancers”
`In addition, IFNy was also found to mediate CD4'
`‘T-cell loss and impair secondary anti-tumour immune
`responsesafter successful initial immunotherapyin
`tumour-bearing mouse models’*. As B7-H1 expression
`can be induced on APCs and multiple humanepithe-
`lial tumours, stimulation of B7-HI expression could be
`a strategy used by the tumourto evade T-cell-mediated
`tumour immunity.
`
`Regulation of B7-H4 expression. The regulation of
`B7-H4expression has only been studied in the human
`system. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) andIL-10 stimulate B7-H4
`expression by monocytes, macrophages and myeloid
`DCs. The DC-differentiation cytokines, GM-CSF
`(granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor)
`andIL-4, decrease B7-H4 expression bythesecells
`induced by IL-6 and IL-10 (REFS 41.55,
`/4) (FIG. 2). TFNs
`seemto have a minimal effect on the induction of B7-H4
`expression, in contrast to the induction of B7-H1 expres-
`sion". In humanovariancancer, tumour-associated T)
`cells trigger macrophages to produce IL-6 andIL-10, and
`these cytokines in turn stimulate B7-H4 expression by
`APCsin anautocrine and/or paracrine manner”. High
`levels of IL-6 and IL-10, but not GM-CSF andIL-4, are
`detected in the ovarian tumour microenvironment,
`Therefore, this dysfunctional cytokine network in the
`tumour microenvironment enables APCs to express
`B7-H4. Interestingly, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and GM-CSF
`have no regulatory effects on B7-H4 expression on
`tumourcells, which indicates that B7-H4 on tumour
`
`cells and B7-H4 on APCs might befunctionallydistinct
`andbedifferentially regulated’!”. Collectively, B7-H |
`and B7-H4 are regulated by distinct mechanisms.
`Thesedifferential regulatory patterns have important
`implications in the generation and amplification of
`tumour-specific immunity.
`
`Evasion of tumour immunity
`The physiological functions of inhibitory B7-family
`members areto limit, terminate and attenuate‘l-cell
`responses, by which theyprevent T-cell hyperactivation
`andavoid tissue and organ damage during immune
`responses!”". B7-H1-deticient ’" and B7-H4-deficient
`mice have been generated and reported in the pub
`lishedliterature. The inhibitory B7 molecules can be
`induced in responseto inflammation and potentially
`to broader

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket